[HN Gopher] The Making of a Prophet ___________________________________________________________________ The Making of a Prophet Author : Caiero Score : 36 points Date : 2022-08-27 05:12 UTC (17 hours ago) (HTM) web link (lareviewofbooks.org) (TXT) w3m dump (lareviewofbooks.org) | hamiltonians wrote: | trim tab, more like flim flam | | Coming from a rich family helps, but today in tech and finance we | see tons of successfull people from more modest means. i think | times have changed and family wealth not as important. | saiya-jin wrote: | > i think times have changed and family wealth not as | important. | | Tell that hundreds of millions of dalits in india (coupled with | hundreds of millions of other lower castes) who never get a | chance to have a proper education because of caste they were | born in, and utter disregard for them by indian state. | | If you ever have/had colleagues from India, trust me they are | not coming from some lower middle class or below. No chance in | hell, maybe in 22nd century. | | And that's 1, albeit huge country. | | But sure if you limit it to cca 5% of the global population | that represents US then its closer to true. In Europe, at least | after WWII, we solved this for good (apart form pesky east | during cold war where regime allegiance could make or break any | talent or hard work, further east its unfortunately still | valid) | civilized wrote: | The author obviously _really_ dislikes his subject, Buckminster | Fuller, but even accounting for some personal bias, the guy does | sound like a bit of an idiot: | | > he found the number pi distasteful. "I'd learned at school that | in order to make a sphere, which is what a bubble is, you employ | pi, and I'd also learned that pi is an irrational number. To how | many places, I wondered, did frustrated nature factor pi? And I | reached the decision right at that moment that nature didn't use | pi," reads his objection in a New Yorker profile. | daniel-cussen wrote: | A bubble factors pi as it moves and deforms and reforms. Not in | _decimal_ , not in a numerical base...in unary. | nsajko wrote: | What does "factor" even mean here? | | The unary base is only good for natural numbers (and | isomorphic sets), right? | daniel-cussen wrote: | It's an analog approximation of a sphere against the error | induced by air motion, and gravity. | dlivingston wrote: | I'm not sure I totally get what you're saying - can you | explain more? | daniel-cussen wrote: | So a bubble is unary in that it represents pi with single | molecules in a circle. Then, forces tug at it--like gravity | a tiny bit, but moreso wind and especially the hyperlocal | flow of air driven by eg temperature (and particle | concentration) that want it to not be spherical. But the | bubble membrane wants to be spherical because that's its | most stable shape. Here we're thinking of big huge bubbles, | those exemplify this more, bubbles like 20 cm in diameter. | So it's a tug of war between the air and the bubble, with | the air tending to infinitely deformed and therefore | inescapably burst bubble and the bubble tending to pi. | Rebelgecko wrote: | I think this is roughly equivalent to their point: Pi is a | rational number, as long as you're in base-pi | L_226 wrote: | Pi is only irrational in base-10 (edit: yes and the rest of | them, I know), if you use base-pi it's just "10". BAM! | irrationality gone :) | | /s | xcambar wrote: | have there been been studies about non-integer bases? I guess | so, but I'd be curious what kind of properties they have... | especially with irrationals... | ithkuil wrote: | Well, we don't really know if nature/reality has an infinite | precision. Perhaps you don't need an irrational Pi to compute | everything up to maximum accuracy. That said, the irrational | number Pi in its mathematical abstraction is extremely useful | and just as "real" in its abstract mathematical domain. | | Not every step of math has to be mapped to something physically | real in order to math to be useful to describe the real world. | | Imaginary numbers per se may not have a direct mapping to any | physical magnitude, but complex numbers nevertheless are very | useful to accurately describe real world phenomena. You just | don't need to focus in the wrong detail and lose the bigger | picture off sight. | cratermoon wrote: | > Perhaps you don't need an irrational Pi to compute | everything up to maximum accuracy | | "For JPL's highest accuracy calculations, which are for | interplanetary navigation, we use 3.141592653589793. Let's | look at this a little more closely to understand why we don't | use more decimal places. I think we can even see that there | are no physically realistic calculations scientists ever | perform for which it is necessary to include nearly as many | decimal points as you present." | | https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/edu/news/2016/3/16/how-many- | decimal... | civilized wrote: | What's baffling to me is the idea that nature manipulates | numbers but not irrational ones. | | This only makes sense if you assume nature must be a digital | computer. | Isamu wrote: | There's a great book on Mathematical Cranks where one of the | recurring themes is that the intuition must always be correct, | and anything that seems counterintuitive is abhorrent and must | be wrong. | Gordonjcp wrote: | They must *hate* the Monty Hall Problem. | actionablefiber wrote: | I think this is an okay belief to have if you approach it | from the bottom up instead of the top down. If something is | counterintuitive, then you shouldn't write it off as a hacky | asterisk in your head, you should improve your understanding | of the domain in question so that it becomes intuitive. | Isamu wrote: | Agreed that intuition can be useful, same as making a guess | or going with your "gut feeling". | | A crank turns that useful but possibly misleading thing | into a crusade where truth is being suppressed by the | establishment. | sdwr wrote: | Makes sense that he's best known for constructing spheres out | of straight lines then. | classified wrote: | Not about the Prophet synthesizer. I am disappointed. | rrr999 wrote: | Reminds me of a lot of "prophets" today. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-08-27 23:00 UTC)