[HN Gopher] 134.5 kg Concrete Bike [video]
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       134.5 kg Concrete Bike [video]
        
       Author : zdw
       Score  : 184 points
       Date   : 2022-08-31 16:44 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.youtube.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.youtube.com)
        
       | aortega wrote:
       | Bikes are incredibly simple devices, it's amazing that they were
       | not invented up until 200 years ago.
        
         | 323 wrote:
         | The chain requires some pretty fine engineering. Arguably
         | jewelry makers had it.
        
         | tromp wrote:
         | 205 years to be precise: https://www.bricsys.com/en-
         | eu/blog/the-first-bicycles
        
         | soperj wrote:
         | Rubber. It's a product of the Americas, before that, wheels
         | sucked.
        
         | kccqzy wrote:
         | No they are not. Most people can't explain off the top of their
         | head how the derailleur works to move the chain from one cog to
         | another, or how freewheeling allows the wheel to move without
         | the pedals to move, or even how the cable allows brakes to be
         | remotely activated from the handlebar. Most people can't even
         | explain why it is possible for a bike to be stable while moving
         | but can't stand on its own. It's counter-intuitive.
         | 
         | There's plenty of ingenuity in the design of a modern bike.
        
           | xdennis wrote:
           | Most of what you're describing isn't necessary for a bike. A
           | fixie bike doesn't have a derailleur or freewheeling. And you
           | can slow down without breaks.
           | 
           | You can even remove the chain. A penny-farthing bike is a
           | surprisingly simple device. It is surprising it wasn't
           | invented earlier.
           | 
           | My guess would be that they weren't invented earlier because
           | they are not that useful without good roads.
        
         | nullc wrote:
         | the steering geometry of a modern bike is not entirely obvious,
         | most configurations are either unstable or unsteerable. Plus a
         | bike is unusable if you don't know how to ride it, so even if
         | you stumbled on a stable steering configuration you might give
         | up on it before you learned to ride it.
        
       | frostwarrior wrote:
       | Imagine getting hit by a car.
       | 
       | Poor car.
        
         | topspin wrote:
         | That's the thought I had; at least the car would take some
         | damage.
        
         | kube-system wrote:
         | It's similar weight to a small motorcycle.
        
       | ginko wrote:
       | The main thing it seems to be missing is brakes.
        
         | tokai wrote:
         | Its fixed gear. Your brake is to stop pedaling.
        
           | Lukas_Skywalker wrote:
           | I thought so too, but at 20:55 you can see the rider stop
           | pedalling while still rolling. It seems to contain a
           | freewheel mechanism: https://youtu.be/Yqgn-qlg1X0?t=1255
        
         | pier25 wrote:
         | Yeah. Good luck stopping that thing with a bit of speed. Notice
         | that in the video he always pedals super slowly.
        
       | barbazoo wrote:
       | At https://youtu.be/Yqgn-qlg1X0?t=312 I wondered why the back
       | dropout* was facing upwards but then later at
       | https://youtu.be/Yqgn-qlg1X0?t=1109 they seemed to have fixed it?
       | 
       | * the part of the frame that attaches to the wheel
        
         | dvirsky wrote:
         | I was wondering that too, thought I missed something.
        
           | Lukas_Skywalker wrote:
           | The frame is upside down. You can see the bottom bracket is
           | on top, and the seat tube is facing down.
        
             | barbazoo wrote:
             | oh yes you're right!!!
        
       | tromp wrote:
       | My favorite part of this project has got to be the helmet. For
       | one, because it's pure concrete, with no metal frame inside it
       | like the other parts. And second, because it best illustrates the
       | utility of the project in that a concrete helmet is literally
       | worse than useless.
        
       | jfim wrote:
       | Reminds me of those yearly engineering competitions where
       | students build canoes out of concrete and race them:
       | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concrete_canoe
        
         | acomjean wrote:
         | Ah my Civil Engineering student years.. Except my year, because
         | the year before the canoe wasn't right, and the sponsoring
         | professor swamped the thing and took a year off (or so was the
         | rumor), so our class never got to build one.
        
       | morepork wrote:
       | Now don't take this near any hills
        
       | kogus wrote:
       | This reminds me of my own wacky idea for a line of fitness
       | products: ordinary everyday items that are normal in every way
       | except that they are intentionally designed to be physically
       | challenging to use.
       | 
       | For example, doors that require a lot of force to open, keyboards
       | with 1lb resistance springs, remote controls that weigh several
       | kilograms, etc. Since many people have trouble going to the gym,
       | it would be a way to introduce weight training in a way that was
       | both unobtrusive and unavoidable.
       | 
       | Just one of those things that has been bouncing around in my head
       | for years now. I think riding this bike would definitely qualify
       | as weight training :)
        
         | egman_ekki wrote:
         | https://youtu.be/FCvtqy4-RS8
        
         | klyrs wrote:
         | I once met a guy on a bike ride who trained with a kids trailer
         | loaded down with bricks. He claimed that it was more time-
         | efficient way to train, and on race days, his bike felt like it
         | was made of helium. My only concerns are wear&tear on knees,
         | and the risk of a crash, getting smashed by a 200lb trailer
         | doesn't sound fun.
        
           | nradov wrote:
           | The Airhub resistance trainer is a safer option. It can
           | selectively apply magnetic resistance (drag) in order to make
           | training rides harder. But when switched off the bike rides
           | like normal, and there are no extra safety risks.
           | 
           | https://airhub.com.au/
           | 
           | Wear on the knees is more an issue of proper bike fit and
           | pedaling technique. If you want to get fit as a cyclist then
           | you have to put in some high wattage training rides. Whether
           | the resistance comes from a heavy trailer or a steep hill or
           | whatever makes no difference to the knee injury risk.
        
         | squarefoot wrote:
         | It's much easier to get married, so you'll have the weekly task
         | of going to the store by foot and bring back bagfuls of
         | groceries, and possibly two packs of bottled water... then
         | return there because you forgot two bags of cat's litter:)
         | 
         | More seriously, ages ago I wondered about a way to generate
         | power by making sort of a (very compact) exoskeleton-like
         | contraption for each limb articulation, so walking or using
         | arms would activate some generators. Mechanical construction
         | would be quite a challenge, however if built in a very compact
         | wearable way it could become a thing: sensors for body
         | parameters could self power, the phone in a pocket equipped
         | with a inductive charger would charge while running, etc.
        
         | hetspookjee wrote:
         | For some reason the feeling of getting exhausted on an
         | ultralight racing bike feels much easier on the mind than
         | getting exhausted on a regular bike with a flat tire. Similar
         | with swimming with slick gear versus swimming with long shorts
         | and a shirt.
        
           | jjcm wrote:
           | There's something to be said about overloading the effort
           | required though. We used to train endurance by dragging a
           | tire behind us in the water. When it came to race day,
           | everything would feel 10x easier.
        
         | avrionov wrote:
         | SNL did a sketch about it:
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZRzJJcq6Rs
        
         | trhway wrote:
         | Famous Russian wrestler a century ago walked with a cane 16 kg
         | weight.
         | 
         | For simple mortals like me - while hiking I've been using the
         | Nordic poles with 8 inches springed amortization which
         | naturally works up your upper body.
        
         | asasidh wrote:
         | they call it functional training
        
         | agumonkey wrote:
         | It would be a cosmic irony, since humans have been trying to
         | make things "easier" since at least 4000 years.
         | 
         | I have another idea, make a lot of crank generators so that
         | biochemical energy gets converted into electricity. I know you
         | won't power your kettle nor your telsa but considering people
         | 1) pay for exercise [0] 2) pay to power the devices to exercise
         | .. I think it's due time.
         | 
         | [0] gym club managed to market gravity (and social context, but
         | mostly gravity).
        
         | jamal-kumar wrote:
         | Kind of the extremely radical opposite to the reasoning behind
         | accessibility, then? Ever have someone in a wheelchair get mad
         | at you?
        
           | na85 wrote:
           | Good luck catching me on their intentionally-hard-to-push
           | chair.
           | 
           | Think of the profits from thiw move fast and break things
           | approach! Always be hustling.
        
             | nicbou wrote:
             | Move slow and get ripped
        
         | LoveMortuus wrote:
         | What about just wearing a weighted vest?
         | 
         | Another interesting idea I've had many many years ago: Skies
         | that have enough buoyancy to be able to float on the sea while
         | a person is standing on them. Do that you ski across the sea.
         | Although the movement would be closer to rollerblades, due to
         | lack of hills.
        
         | marcodiego wrote:
         | > keyboards with 1lb resistance springs
         | 
         | This may be a good recipe for tendinitis.
        
           | tinalumfoil wrote:
           | Everything here sounds like a recipe for injury. When you're
           | lifting heavy things you should be focused on (correctly)
           | lifting the heavy thing. If you turn the oven door into a
           | deadlift you're going to forget one day and throw out your
           | back.
        
             | xeromal wrote:
        
             | nicbou wrote:
             | Have you heard of crossfit?
        
             | Swenrekcah wrote:
             | After three days of the 4kg remote you'll be over at your
             | date's house and promptly punch her in the face when
             | picking up her remote.
        
         | mabbo wrote:
         | You're thinking too small, friend.
         | 
         | Build a space station with gravity via rotation. Then spin it
         | up to 150% of normal gravity. Now everything is 50% heavier,
         | yourself included!
        
           | animatedb wrote:
           | You are thinking much too small, friend. Spin the earth
           | faster and we can finally get rid of leap seconds.
        
             | squarefoot wrote:
             | That would defeat the initial purpose as faster Earth
             | rotation would also make us lighter.
        
           | littlestymaar wrote:
           | Strong Goku vibe.
        
           | nicbou wrote:
           | I wish that VC wasted money on you instead of the same boring
           | mobility startups.
        
           | dcminter wrote:
           | You don't even need to be in space if you want to make things
           | heavier. As always the great David Jones (Daedalus) had this
           | idea first in his New Scientist column (16th Feb 1968), and
           | it's included in the compendium "The inventions of Daedalus"
        
             | Retric wrote:
             | The idea is much older for example 1948:
             | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotor_(ride)
             | 
             | Various test chambers for astronauts where built to test
             | how people respond to higher gravity / a rotating reference
             | frame. Actually trying to do this runs into some unexpected
             | issues in practice. Here is a Tom Scott video about a more
             | recent example: https://youtu.be/bJ_seXo-Enc
        
             | andai wrote:
             | Is this available to read online? Alternatively, could you
             | summarize the idea?
        
         | skocznymroczny wrote:
         | > keyboards with 1lb resistance springs
         | 
         | I'm sure there would be mech keyboard enthusiasts who would
         | find the actuation force too light on those
        
         | 323 wrote:
         | > _remote controls that weigh several kilograms_
         | 
         | That would require either very expensive metals, or a giant
         | remote control.
         | 
         | But something like this is already done - a lot of people use
         | leg weights as an extra in the gym.
        
           | jffry wrote:
           | 1kg of lead is like 90mL. I just measured my quite svelte TV
           | remote at 22cm x 2cm x 5cm = 220mL. I'm sure you could easily
           | fit 1.5 kilos of lead in there, and with a slightly thicker
           | "A/V receiver" style remote we could easily make that 3-4kg
        
             | throwaway0a5e wrote:
             | Unfortunately the venn diagram between "people who want a
             | heavy remote for physical fitness reasons" and "people who
             | will absolutely lose their minds when they find out it has
             | lead in it no matter how safely you have encapsulated it"
             | is pretty close to a circle.
        
               | jffry wrote:
               | That's OK, the lead remote is simply an anchor pricing
               | option (heh), we can sell those people a luxury tungsten
               | weighted remote instead!
               | 
               | As an added bonus we can pack in 70% more mass in the
               | same space
        
         | samatman wrote:
         | The door idea is a safety issue, but there's a market for a
         | gag-gift remote control holder that's a barbell, for sure.
         | Whether it helps anyone is an open question, but it hits the
         | sweet spot for twee Americana gas station stuff.
        
         | adrianmonk wrote:
         | This is similar to my business plan where I start a combo
         | moving company / personal training service and charge people to
         | move other people's furniture. Double profit!
        
           | ihaveajob wrote:
           | It reminds me of "u-pick" farms. Less labor, higher prices.
           | The only constraint is that they have to be somewhere easy to
           | reach.
        
           | tomjakubowski wrote:
           | Jack Garbarino beat you to it. Read The Movement; there's a
           | copy on my shelf.
        
           | phito wrote:
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkNxvUrWQ_Q :)
        
             | shepherdjerred wrote:
             | I watched this episode just last night. Incredible
             | 
             | He's got a new show out:
             | https://www.imdb.com/title/tt10802170/
        
             | adrianmonk wrote:
             | Hah, so I guess I'm not the only one with that idea then.
        
           | acomjean wrote:
           | Its not quite the same but one of the Moving Companies around
           | boston has a rowing club.
           | 
           | https://www.gentlegiantrowing.org/sponsor
           | 
           | "and approach to moving as a sport, requiring dedication and
           | teamwork. Many Gentle Giant employees are current or former
           | athletes from a wide variety of sports and competitive
           | backgrounds. Current and former employees include both
           | Olympic, collegiate and club rowers."
        
             | caboteria wrote:
             | Gentle Giant is really more of a rowing club that has a
             | moving company. They moved our company a few years back and
             | I've never seen anyone carry as much weight as quickly and
             | effortlessly as those guys.
        
           | sandworm101 wrote:
           | Except that moving boxes and furniture doesnt promote
           | fitness. Most of your time will be sitting in a truck. Then
           | it will be repetitive motions with moderate weights. It would
           | be more akin to life as a fedex driver than a modern workout.
        
           | fredley wrote:
           | Have you heard of Good Gym in the UK?
           | 
           | https://www.goodgym.org/
        
             | xeromal wrote:
             | What a fun idea!
        
           | trhway wrote:
           | Such scheme is somewhat popular in agriculture where city
           | dwellers come to work on a farm and are paying for the
           | experience.
        
           | squidgyhead wrote:
           | I have the same plan! We can team up!
        
           | Swenrekcah wrote:
           | We think alike! I would have started that company years ago
           | if not for the threat of the inevitable lawsuit when a client
           | drops a grand piano on someone's head.
        
           | agumonkey wrote:
           | Holy .. I wanted to do just that.
        
           | IshKebab wrote:
           | I've definitely seen deliveroo cyclists doing it for the
           | fitness.
        
       | xuhu wrote:
       | And the reason it's easier to make than a wooden bike is that you
       | can take a normal bike and pour concrete onto each element.
        
         | kfnic wrote:
         | William Osman on YouTube made a bike fully out of wood:
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yJdz-kjfLk
         | 
         | [haven't finished the video yet, not sure if this or something
         | similar was mentioned]
        
         | kawsper wrote:
         | Someone in the UK made a wooden frame:
         | https://youtu.be/jd0vt5v37B0
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | kosyblysk666 wrote:
        
       | sgjohnson wrote:
       | I wonder if they could make one from Iridium now. Now that would
       | be flashy.
        
       | matthewfcarlson wrote:
       | If nothing else, it's a good way to get in shape
        
         | system2 wrote:
         | Or break some limbs.
        
         | stavros wrote:
         | If that shape is flat...
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | tomcam wrote:
       | I have seen plenty of bikes that could pass as sculptures but
       | this is the first sculpture I've seen that could be used as a
       | bike.
        
       | c2h5oh wrote:
       | I strongly suspect that the steel reinforcement used in the frame
       | could have acted as a rigid enough frame without the concrete
        
         | amelius wrote:
         | I strongly suspect they could just as well have used a normal
         | bike and cast the concrete around it (which they did for some
         | parts) ...
        
           | wolpoli wrote:
           | I suspect that the concrete will crack if it is just molded
           | to the frame itself. Concrete cracks easily without support.
        
         | epakai wrote:
         | It sort of does. You can see the fork got damaged mid-span in
         | some of the riding shots. Still there isn't enough strength in
         | places like the fork ends or crown without the concrete.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | ejb999 wrote:
         | correct, it is a steel framed bike, covered with concrete - not
         | a concrete bike.
        
       | m1117 wrote:
       | This is also how google approaches product design
        
       | djmips wrote:
       | This is a metaphor for poorly designed software. Don't worry
       | we'll optimize it at the end!
        
       | amenghra wrote:
       | Sounds like a bulldozer. Love it!
        
       | Theodores wrote:
       | I have always wanted to make a mountain bike out of scaffolding
       | poles in order to review it positively.
       | 
       | Notionally such a bike should score highly in many key metrics.
       | In the review the obvious failings are overlooked yet the reader
       | can work it out for themselves.
        
       | bch wrote:
       | I remember in the 1980s _Bicycling_ or some such magazine wrapped
       | a road bike in concrete, called it a composite bicycle and did a
       | full review. Needless to say, it scored poorly.
        
       | peteradio wrote:
       | I'm glad they included springs on the seat, otherwise that could
       | have been an uncomfortable ride.
        
       | lizardactivist wrote:
       | Only ex-bodybuilders turned bike thiefs would think of stealing
       | that!
        
       | ChrisMarshallNY wrote:
       | So now bicyclists can suffer the same class of life-threatening
       | injury that motorcyclists do!
        
       | cryptodan wrote:
       | The DeLorean went to far back.
        
       | korse wrote:
       | Not a whole lot of engineers on here I guess?
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Northern_Concrete_Tobogg...
        
       | mkoryak wrote:
       | when I lived in JP (a part of Boston) I made my commuter bike
       | "unstealable" by taping it and putting joint compound all over
       | the frame. The thing was ugly as sin and looked at lot like this
       | bike.
       | 
       | I could leave it locked with one of those cheap combination cable
       | locks, and no one ever took it.
        
         | krasin wrote:
         | Do you happen to have photos of the bike?
        
         | elicash wrote:
         | I like this. But alternatively, couldn't that make it look
         | abandoned and possibly have the opposite effect?
        
         | blamazon wrote:
         | I do this with extension cords, bit of electrical tape and most
         | potential yoinkers will think twice about yoinking.
        
           | djmips wrote:
           | I do this to my own body - bits of electrical tape - I am
           | virtually un-kidnap-able now.
        
       | derac wrote:
       | The level of maker youtube projects has been going off the
       | charts.
       | 
       | Some examples from less well-known creators:
       | 
       | Drunk Mel Gibson arrest diorama https://youtu.be/2UoHb0ziMDA
       | 
       | Knife throwing machine https://youtu.be/-BKEZbYOMpI
       | 
       | 3d printed harmonic drive https://youtu.be/Emvo3bLT-Z4
        
         | donjoe wrote:
         | The knife throwing machine reminds me a lot of the slingshot
         | channel:
         | 
         | https://youtube.com/c/Slingshotchannel
        
       | causi wrote:
       | Rather misleading since the concrete isn't even structurally
       | integral to the bike. It's more like a rebar bike that had
       | concrete poured on it.
        
         | ddkto wrote:
         | I suppose the technically correct term would be reinforced
         | concrete bike
        
           | cptskippy wrote:
           | I would say "I covered a bike in concrete" would be the most
           | accurate title.
        
             | stingrae wrote:
             | to be fair, large amounts of the frame are not just merely
             | covered in concrete
        
               | cptskippy wrote:
               | Yes, and the entire thing is either reinforced with rebar
               | or structurally dependent on actual bicycle parts. You
               | could argue that the rebar reinforcements, if welded
               | together, would make a sufficient frame and the concrete
               | is primarily acting as a bonding agent.
        
         | gpt5 wrote:
         | It seems like they could achieve the same results by pouring
         | concrete around a real bike frame (instead of build a bike
         | frame out of rebar).
        
           | Kaibeezy wrote:
           | The combination with steel is what gives concrete its power.
           | It's a composite material created by the two things together.
           | Concrete surrounds the steel frame and penetrates it. It
           | binds the steel together.
        
         | version_five wrote:
         | The same thought went through my mind watching it, but you
         | could say the same about most (many?) concrete structures.
         | Someone with a structural background could explain better, but
         | I believe the rebar and concrete provide different kinds of
         | strength, like concrete is compressive strong (and keeps the
         | minimal amount of rebar from moving around and bending, while
         | the rebar keeps the concrete from cracking. Even for the bike,
         | it wouldn't be the same structurally if they just wired up a
         | rebar frame
        
           | pkaye wrote:
           | I took civil engineering a long ago in college but diverged
           | on my career. This is what I recall.
           | 
           | In reinforce concrete beams the bending causes compression on
           | the top and tension on the bottom. Since concrete is weak in
           | tension (maybe 1/10 of compression strength), the rebar at
           | the bottom will carry the tension. When you do the design
           | calculations, some approximations are made like concrete
           | carries no tension on bottom half of beam and how the stress
           | is distributed on the top portion. Then with iterative
           | analysis you can converge on an solution. Then once you got
           | the basic design, there will other rules like displacement,
           | buckling conditions.
           | 
           | Here is an example design calculation I could find:
           | https://civilengineeringbible.com/subtopics.php?i=32
        
           | pwg wrote:
           | > but I believe the rebar and concrete provide different
           | kinds of strength
           | 
           | Yes, concrete provides great compressive strength, but is not
           | very strong given tensile loading.
           | 
           | Rebar provides the tensile loading support that concrete
           | alone lacks.
           | 
           | See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebar
        
           | TheDudeMan wrote:
           | Yes, but it doesn't matter for a bike. Riding it is not going
           | to crumple that amount of rebar.
        
             | stergios wrote:
             | The front left fork failed. You can see the crack in the
             | video as he is riding. The front fork has a bending moment
             | as well as compressive force. When the bending force was
             | applied the concrete failed and the rebar did not.
             | 
             | Overall, I really liked this as an art project. I'm not
             | sure what the artist wants to communicate with the bike,
             | but I found it very satisfying.
        
               | JKCalhoun wrote:
               | I'd like to think they're reminding us why we don't make
               | bikes out of concrete (but we can!).
        
               | debacle wrote:
               | > I'm not sure what the artist wants to communicate with
               | the bike
               | 
               | "I paid a lot of money for an architecture degree I'm not
               | using."
        
               | 2muchcoffeeman wrote:
               | How much of this can you just chalk up to using concrete
               | and just copying the design of a normal bike? This is a
               | fun art project but doesn't seem like much more.
               | 
               | Sorry for being negative about an art project. I think I
               | was projecting my own biases, but it sounded like an
               | engineering project and then I didn't learn anything.
        
       | prvc wrote:
       | Yes, but why? And isn't it more of a bike covered in concrete
       | than a concrete bike?
        
       | z9znz wrote:
       | Oh there's a lot of fun concepts to muse about. But one is
       | brakes.
       | 
       | That aside, at least it wouldn't get stolen in Amsterdam.
       | 
       | Which reminds me of something a friend did. He lived in a
       | neighborhood where anything visible would be stolen. So he took
       | an old computer tower case and filled it with concrete. Then he
       | left it on his front porch.
       | 
       | Predictably some guy tried to steal it. The poor fool managed to
       | move it one house over before giving up and dropping it in the
       | street.
        
       | hooverd wrote:
       | Finally, the secret to how those bike-share bikes are made.
        
       | utopcell wrote:
       | It's great that he added concrete steps for creating the bike.
        
       | bjourne wrote:
       | That's brutal.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-08-31 23:00 UTC)