[HN Gopher] US Drought Monitor ___________________________________________________________________ US Drought Monitor Author : pilingual Score : 114 points Date : 2022-09-04 16:20 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (droughtmonitor.unl.edu) (TXT) w3m dump (droughtmonitor.unl.edu) | matthewdgreen wrote: | The consequences of global warming used to be a "future" concern. | Starting to feel like that was extremely optimistic. | pantalaimon wrote: | It used to be a ,,future concern" in the past, but due to the | nature of time moving forward (and humanity not doing anything | of significance to addresses the issue) that future is now. | ben_w wrote: | For me, yes and no at the same time. The _average_ increase is | slow, steady, and not too far from what I was expecting... but | the geographic variation and the behaviour of the extremes is | much stronger than I expected. | mellavora wrote: | > The average increase is slow, steady, | | I'm not sure about that. This year is a significant uptick | from 3 years ago where I live (central Europe). | | I did notice a slow warming since 2006 (when I moved to my | current location), but even 2 years ago there were only a few | summer nights where you could comfortably sit outside after | dark without a jacket. | | It has been that warm every single night this summer. | | If you want to see it on a global scale, look at the oceans. | It has been "steady" there, though not slow, | https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/ocean-heat/ | | And most of the heat (90%) has gone into the ocean. Now the | oceans are warm, so we will see it on land. | | I'm expecting rapid acceleration over the next 10 years, not | slow, and certainly not steady. | | https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/feb/01/extreme-. | .. | ben_w wrote: | > This year is a significant uptick from 3 years ago where | I live | | Too short a time scale and too localised geographically to | count as "average". First time I visited the USA, I spent | Christmas in CA, which was several degrees warmer than | normal for the season, people were surfing[0]; at the same | time, the east coast of the US was several degrees colder | than normal for the season, it was snowing[0]. | | > If you want to see it on a global scale, look at the | oceans. It has been "steady" there, though not slow, | https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/ocean-heat/ | | Zettajoules without context is big and scary. But the Earth | is an astronomical body and astronomical numbers are always | big. | | 588 joules per square millimetre, sounds even scarier! But | that doesn't tell me the depth over which the heat was | added. | | But fortunately I don't need to guess at that, as the | temperature is easier to measure directly: | https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/ | | Using that heating figure and that energy figure, that's | like heating a water planet by 0.85 C to a depth of about | 370 m. | | [0] For all I know both these things happen every year at | Christmas in the US, but it still felt very bizarre to me | as an outsider, and that year did have opposite temperature | anomalies on the east and west coasts. | Guid_NewGuid wrote: | Strong same. While 1 swallow doesn't make a summer the | combination of 1/3rd of Pakistan being underwater plus | heatwaves in Europe and blackouts in China with all the other | stuff does get concerning. | | Maybe the 'establishment' causing scientists to only disclose | the most conservative and defensible estimates misled us as to | how fast and severe this thing would be. | | I caught myself getting frustrated the supermarket was out of | instant coffee the other day and realized I'm in no way | mentally prepared for what's coming. | joe_the_user wrote: | I think establishment science has talked about increased | weather variability as a result of the slowing of the | jetstream for a while. No one done a good job in saying "So a | one degree increase overall can mean five or ten degrees | increase hovering over a given area for weeks and that's | devastating and deadly in many places, especially areas that | have already pushed their ecology and infrastructure to the | edge". | Aloha wrote: | Its interesting how you can see how the large storms that came | thru Arizona and Texas between the 16th and the 30th reduced | drought over so much of that area. | JoeAltmaier wrote: | Curious that drought seems to respect political boundaries in | many cases. Is that because political boundaries often respect | geographic features? Or is reporting not uniform across those | boundaries? | jjtheblunt wrote: | In what cases? I'm not seeing what you describe. | rblatz wrote: | I was surprised to see all the Hawaiian islands in some level of | drought. | dekerta wrote: | Windy.com has a neat feature that displays current drought | conditions for the entire world: | | https://www.windy.com/-Drought-intensity-awp_0_40 | StephenSmith wrote: | Why does this not line up well with the linked data, I wonder? | ninkendo wrote: | Looks like windy.com is showing short-term trends, perhaps | driven by things like "how long since it last rained", etc. | Michigan is showing severe drought, and then you set the date | to the 12th and it all clears to normal (there's rain in the | forecast around then.) | | It's a lot different than the long term trends driven by | total annual precipitation, snowpack, etc. | kickout wrote: | windy is my favorite website. Absolutely loved it from day1. | Wonder if anyone on that team is a HNer | sokoloff wrote: | Interesting that windy shows Cape Ann (Gloucester, MA area) as | "no drought" and the unl site has the same area as "extreme | drought". | koheripbal wrote: | Yeah, both data sources are very suspect. | baxtr wrote: | Are they good pages for other countries or a global index? There | is a good one for Germany: | | https://www.ufz.de/index.php?de=37937 | nathanaldensr wrote: | I love this site. Especially cool is the comparison slider, where | you can compare drought assignments from two different times. | sydd wrote: | Whats up with the extreme drought in Hawaii? | https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/CurrentMap/StateDroughtMonito... | ac29 wrote: | Just because it rains a lot in the tropics doesnt mean there | cant be a drought. Fresh water supplies are often in short | supply on islands, especially ones where there are lots of | people. | pantalaimon wrote: | Same for Germany: https://www.ufz.de/index.php?de=37937 | gernb wrote: | when does the water just run out? like is it possible say in 2 | months or 14 months that there will be no water for millions of | people? in particular in Southern California? | kickout wrote: | Still not quite 1930s dust bowl dry, but we're on the brink. | Dangerous situation with no easy fixes either (other than | telling California farmers they can't water) | ericmcer wrote: | If these conditions continue we will be faced with a | disasterous shortage of Almond Milk and Almond Butter | mellavora wrote: | So Cal running out of water might be more pleasant than the | other possibility | | https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abq0995 | | Climate change is increasing the risk of a California megaflood | kortilla wrote: | We're not even close. Keep in mind the vast majority of water | is still going to ag and industry. Residents are left fighting | over like 15% of the total flow. | | There are far more voters who are residents than there are | farmers. When things get desperate those farmers' water rights | in the CA constitution will get amended in a heartbeat. | delecti wrote: | Much of the southwest US is under very real risk of exactly | that. | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southwestern_North_American_me... | hyperrail wrote: | Take note that the map is partly based on opinion: | | https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/About/WhatistheUSDM.aspx | | > _Who draws the map?_ | | > _Several authors from the NDMC, NOAA and USDA create the map. | They take turns, usually two weeks at a time._ | | > _How do they figure out where and how bad drought is?_ | | > _This is what makes the U.S. Drought Monitor unique. It is not | a statistical model, although numeric inputs are many: [...]_ | ruddct wrote: | Drought.gov also has interesting graphs, historical context and | descriptions of the various severity levels. | | https://www.drought.gov/states/california | fasteddie31003 wrote: | I think there is some selection bias in maps like this because it | has no data on above average rainfall. I know where I live we've | had one of the rainiest summers ever but you won't see this on a | map like this. | simonsarris wrote: | Drought.gov actually keeps track of that! | | For example for New Hampshire: | https://www.drought.gov/states/new-hampshire | | Scroll down to the graph, click "1895 - Present (Monthly)", and | click the different levels of exceptional drought/exceptional | wetness. | | You can see that NH has been trending wetter for the last 100 | years (as with all the northeast), more or less the opposite of | the southwestern US. Large periods of exceptional wet have | happened in my life, with fewer big droughts than ever. (Alas, | we're in a drought right now.) | | You can also see that California had some unusually wet periods | in the 80's and 90's, which might have informed policy, but | were simply an anomaly: | https://www.drought.gov/states/california | joe_the_user wrote: | The monitor seems problematic to me in all sorts of ways. As | you say, there's no reference to above average rainfall. | | Also, it should be base-lining on the median result, not the | average result. California has always had a few very wet and | many dry years so the monitor usually shows drought. This | serves developers and farmers who don't want to admit | California is dry _place_ and you should do projects taking a | lot of water. | | And finally, the drought monitor measures dryness, not overall | rainfall but it doesn't make this obvious. California's | reservoirs are low but we have had fairly typical (median) | rainfall for the last two years (and even had an usually humid | spring and summer). The difference is increased heat increases | evaporation and dryness and the map should make this | distinction obvious. | richiebful1 wrote: | It's better to go to the government agency site for the | source data. They make it clear that the drought level is | based on the availability of water compared to normal. | | https://www.drought.gov/data-maps-tools/us-drought-monitor | doodlebugging wrote: | The map looks to be pretty accurate if I consider my own location | except that I should be in the Exceptional Drought instead of | Extreme Drought category but recognizing that it is highly | smoothed and can't show all the bumps, like my place, I can say | it is pretty close. | | I have tracked and measured rainfall at my place for more than 20 | years. So far this year we are still almost 2" (51 mm) below the | lowest YTD rainfall total for this date in 20 years. In addition, | we are almost 11" (279 mm) below the average YTD rainfall total | for this date in the last 20 years. | | YTD Numbers from my worksheet for September 4 - Lowest since 2002 | 14.8" (376 mm); Average since 2002 23.8" (604 mm); Actual YTD | 2022 for September 4 - 13" (330 mm) | | That's better off than we were 2 weeks ago though. The | temperature had been >100 _F ( >37.8_C) for weeks and everything | had dried out including established trees. My local rainfall | totals showed almost 16" (406 mm) below the average YTD rainfall | for the date during the last 20 years and more than 7.4" (188 mm) | under the lowest YTD rainfall total for that date in the last 20 | years. | | YTD Numbers from my worksheet for August 22 - Lowest since 2002 | 14.8" (376 mm); Average since 2002 23.1" (587 mm); Actual YTD | 2022 for August 22 - 7.4" (188 mm) | | The lowest YTD totals before this year are from 2011. | | With temperatures ranging from 85 _F to 93_ F (29.4-33.9*C) since | the first storm front came through it has been a huge contrast. I | am letting everything that will still grow go to seed now. | Migratory birds always stop by during the coldest days to eat the | berries on the trees and perennials I have planted. Two weeks ago | the plants were dormant and appeared dead. They have bloomed and | it appears that I may have some set fruit before autumn shuts it | all down in a few weeks. | ijidak wrote: | Very interesting. Where are you located? | doodlebugging wrote: | North Texas, west of Fort Worth between there and Abilene. | Where the west begins, LOL. | koheripbal wrote: | My data point is highly exaggerated. The reservoirs here are | high, we're on a freshwater river, and no one is talking about | drought here - and yet it says Severe drought. | | I also question the selection of "abnormally dry" as the lowest | level. Also, why aren't "abnormally wet" regions shown? ....and | what about different colors in the same watershed? Lower areas | of a watershed shouldn't be dryer than the highlands. | Waterluvian wrote: | Very cool. | | A few comments (which probably need to be emailed to them and not | just put here): | | 1. The main page map absolutely NEEDS a legend. | | 2. I wonder if any sort of drought map should also include the | other half of the spectrum. Are are blank regions normal? | Exceptionally wet? Flooding? | icegreentea2 wrote: | The linked page does have a legend just below the map. Look for | "Intensity and Impacts". | jseliger wrote: | The gap between the drought monitor and the rejection of | desalination plants seems notable: | https://www.reuters.com/world/us/california-regulator-reject.... | vkou wrote: | That's a red herring. The biggest problem during a drought is | for agriculture, and you can't afford to desalinate enough | water to make agriculture work. | RC_ITR wrote: | But what Ag. wants you to believe is that _they_ should get | the cheap water and those coastal elite cities should have to | pay a premium for their desalinated water. | sologoub wrote: | It's frankly appalling, but people are easy to manipulate with | false promises of nearly free water efficiency and paint | desalination as an expensive waste. | | LA county water districts are further busy cleaning recycled | water enough to pump as potable, despite a pretty bad track | record of keeping that water actually clean [1]. All the while | saying residents are too incompetent to have access to normal | recycled water at properly for irrigation because "someone will | mess up and interconnect with potable". Many engineers have | pointed out that it's a solved problem, and that backflow | prevention devices are a thing and will prevent such issues at | individual property meters. | | [1]https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-08-11/water- | re... | sillystuff wrote: | >LA county water districts are further busy cleaning recycled | water enough to pump as potable, | | San Diego started doing this decades ago, and it has worked | out all right. "Toilet to tap," was the slogan the detractors | came up with, and it stuck. My concern for LA would be | industrial waste water in their waste streams. | RC_ITR wrote: | It's frankly appalling that the agriculture lobby has made | people believe that California is anywhere near needing | desalination or even frankly grey water for urban use. | | California _residents_ use a very small amount of California | 's water, most is Ag, which is exported to the rest of the | world. [0] | | So the idea that California is somehow shooting themselves in | the foot (rather than refusing to further subsidize the Ag. | industry which has done insane damage to the state's ecology) | is severely misinformed. | | [0]https://cwc.ca.gov/-/media/CWC- | Website/Files/Documents/2019/... | capitainenemo wrote: | https://slatestarcodex.com/2015/05/11/california-water- | you-d... "But if all the savings from water rationing | amounted to 20% of our residential water use, then that | equals about 0.5 MAF, which is about 10% of the water used | to irrigate alfalfa. The California alfalfa industry makes | a total of $860 million worth of alfalfa hay per year. So | if you calculate it out, a California resident who wants to | spend her fair share of money to solve the water crisis | without worrying about cutting back could do it by paying | the alfalfa industry $2 to not grow $2 worth of alfalfa, | thus saving as much water as if she very carefully rationed | her own use." | | https://www.npr.org/2015/04/18/400573611/a-water-markets- | mig... | | It seems main issue is no political will in California to | resolve it.. | azinman2 wrote: | But that alfalfa also goes to feed cows, which feed | humans. | | All that's grown in CA supports humans. You could get all | "America first" with it, which has some merit here, but | CA still massively feeds the US. | jshen wrote: | We should eat a lot less meat, particularly red meat, | which is extremely wasteful and destructive to the | environment compared to other sources of food. | steve_adams_86 wrote: | Look at a crop like lentils though. They require | relatively little water, allow for farming practices | which mitigate soil erosion and the need for tilling, are | not nutrient-intensive, and they yield an excellent food. | Alfalfa seems insane to grow beside such a great crop | like lentils. | | The only reason we don't, as far as I can see, is that | the demand isn't there. | capitainenemo wrote: | If that alfalfa is really that cheap and easily shipped, | it doesn't seem to make economic sense to produce it | there, and if there was a real water market, it seems it | would not be. So, producing cow feed in calfornia seems, | at least from those 2 articles to not only be heavily | subsidised by a poorly designed system of legacy water | rights, but also completely unsustainable. | | That is... get the water priced correctly, and let the | market sort out ratio of cow alfalfa production to other | water priorities... | throwaway09223 wrote: | "All that's grown in CA supports humans." | | This can be said about anything, but what matters is | whether its is better to do something _else_ to provide | the same support. | | California only produces 3% of the country's hay. We | could just grow a bit more elsewhere to compensate. | Ending alfalfa in California wouldn't be a big deal. It's | an extremely low value crop. | | Meanwhile, to grow this tiny amount of alfalfa we spend | more than double all household water use in the entire | state. Including swimming pools, toilets, showers, | everything. | | It's inexplicably foolish. | orionion wrote: | It's not just burgers and steaks. | | Dairy cows turn alfalfa into milk and we turn milk into | butter, cheese, yogurt, kefir, cream, sour cream, cottage | cheese, cream cheese, ice cream, whey, casein, pudding, | flan, caramel, crema, etc. | RC_ITR wrote: | Dairy is significantly less resource intensive than meat | (though still bad in its own right) since we don't have | to regrow a cow every time it is milked (whereas we do | every time it's slaughtered) | shsuxnsusd wrote: | RC_ITR wrote: | Is your argument based on the idea that cows are the only | food humans can eat? | azinman2 wrote: | Not at all; that's obviously not the case. There's also | potatoes. | shsuxnsusd wrote: | ajmurmann wrote: | I had been saying for years that proper market pricing | for water should solve this. However, it was called out | in a previous discussion of this topic that farmers don't | get their water out of a faucet. They typically will get | it out of wells or rivers that run through their | properties. Addressing this would apparently require | reworking water rights that have been in place for a long | time. | TaylorAlexander wrote: | It's fascinating watching the extreme conditions going on all | over the world. I live in California and we have of course been | getting drought and wildfires for a long time now, but I am | noticing too that this is happening in many places. | | I just found this youtube channel talking about the droughts in | China, and the story is remarkable. Low water levels means | hydroelectric dams are shutting off, rolling blackouts during a | massive heat wave. Feels like a story out of California, but this | is happening all over China. | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_5CAMs_wkc | | There's the flooding in Bangladesh: | | https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/6/22/bangladesh-floods-e... | | Heat waves in Europe are leading to thousands of excess deaths: | | https://www.politico.eu/article/excess-death-surged-heat-wav... | | Global average temperature anomaly is now 0.85 C above pre- | industrial levels. | | https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/ | | I noticed someone from the UK saying they had a heat wave in the | 1970's, but then someone shared a plot of global temperature | anomaly from back then and today. That summer there was a bit of | an increase in the UK from that heat wave, but the rest of the | world was more normal. Today, the increase is happening all over | the world at once. | | I desperately hope that people get the message. It seems that | maybe the tide is turning, but I know it is already so late, I | hope we can act fast before we make things so much worse. | akolbe wrote: | As for the UK, note also that the highest temperature during | the 1976 heatwave in the UK was 35.9 degC. | | We've just had over 40 degC here - nearly 5 degC more, half a | century later. | | 40 degC and 36 degC feel quite different. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-09-04 23:00 UTC)