[HN Gopher] Github.com Down Again?
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Github.com Down Again?
        
       Author : leesalminen
       Score  : 61 points
       Date   : 2022-09-06 21:58 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (github.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (github.com)
        
       | taf2 wrote:
       | Based on the comments maybe they were just A/B testing the new
       | 500 error page?
        
       | jmartens wrote:
       | The errors seems to be rather intermittent. Metrist saw a
       | grouping of them at about 4am pacific today, and then again 3pm.
       | That said, in the last hour, less than 1% of Metrist functional
       | tests failed.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | frozencell wrote:
       | Could an on-chain Github.com fork prevents those down times?
        
       | itsdrewmiller wrote:
       | Yep, crashed within the last 5 minutes.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | layer8 wrote:
       | Luckily, Git is decentralized, so that shouldn't be an issue.
        
         | tenken wrote:
         | I guess you don't use GitHub Actions or a CI build workflow ...
        
           | layer8 wrote:
           | Exactly my point.
        
         | actually_a_dog wrote:
         | Tell that to people who deploy from Github.
        
       | leesalminen wrote:
       | Looking at downdetector.com right now and YouTubeTV, HostGator,
       | DirecTV, YouTube, Paramount+, crunchyroll, slink, Philo and Roku
       | all have big spikes in the past few minutes. Wonder how/why
       | Github is related to all these streaming services.
        
         | jmartens wrote:
         | My guess is that there is zero correlation between all those
         | products you mention, and Github. DownDetector is interesting,
         | but I find it to have more noise than signal.
        
         | fotta wrote:
         | I wonder if the current US West Coast heatwave is causing some
         | shared cloud infrastructure to go down.
        
       | pcmonk wrote:
       | Was down for a couple minutes, is back for me
        
       | zxcvbn4038 wrote:
       | I've seen more unicorns today...
        
       | hamburglar wrote:
       | I've seen two different error pages intermittently. One is a 500
       | page with a cartoon character holding a sign that says "500" and
       | the other is a page titled "Unicorn!" with the message "We had
       | issues producing the response to your request" and a link to a
       | status page that says everything is fine.
        
         | taf2 wrote:
         | those sound pretty exciting my error page just says:
         | 
         | "No server is currently available to service your request"
         | 
         | and the images are all broken.
        
         | jwilk wrote:
         | I've never seen the non-unicorn one before:
         | 
         | https://i.imgur.com/rjw9ekL.png
        
       | alexjplant wrote:
       | I've been getting the unicorn for the past few minutes... reminds
       | me of the Steve Miller Band logo. Nothing on their status
       | channels as of yet.
        
       | djbusby wrote:
       | Mine is working , web interface and CLI
       | 
       | Edit: northeast USA
        
       | ternaryoperator wrote:
       | Crashed but seems to be up again
        
       | seanieb wrote:
       | its back.
        
       | kc10 wrote:
       | Yes. Statuspage is not yet updated but down at least for the last
       | 5+ mins
        
       | gsanderson wrote:
       | Seems to be back up again now, was down for me too
        
       | oneplane wrote:
       | Yes, intermittent but even partial loads stall out. Was about to
       | submit for the same reason.
        
       | chrisseaton wrote:
       | No you're all mistaken - there hasn't been any down-time at all
       | throughout all of September https://www.githubstatus.com/history.
       | 
       | Edit: GitHub making me look a fool by just updating it now (they
       | didn't for the earlier outage...)
        
         | HL33tibCe7 wrote:
         | It was a bright cold day in April, and github.com was up...
        
         | djhaskin987 wrote:
         | It happened to me and I was also confused. I saw it wasn't on
         | the status page, and I thought, GitHub must be like Amazon,
         | unwilling to admit fault on the status page.
        
         | fotta wrote:
         | there is no outage in Github Sing Se
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | presidentender wrote:
       | Partial outages of cloud services feel more and more common
       | lately. AWS had degraded service a few weeks (months?) ago. Am I
       | mis-remembering how robust everything except Reddit and Twitter
       | used to be? It feels as if the internet caught a nasty cold at
       | some point and just can't kick it.
        
         | withinboredom wrote:
         | Also, it seems way more common to find devs you work with to be
         | over-idealized (focusing on "code beautification" or some other
         | vanity metric vs. accomplishing a task). There's nothing wrong
         | with beautiful code, but I've seen the complexity it can add to
         | an otherwise simple project.
        
           | sjrd wrote:
           | To me, if the code is not "as simple as possible, but not
           | simpler", it is not beautiful.
        
             | withinboredom wrote:
             | And there's nothing wrong with that, but, I've seen some
             | devs these days spend waaay too much time on "making it
             | simpler" or whatever their ideal is, at the cost of error
             | handling or you know, solving an actual problem.
             | Personally, I don't care what the code looks like as long
             | as it's resilient in the face of unexpected errors (ex: a
             | user input of 0 to a division function is not
             | "exceptional," you should have anticipated that, while a
             | service input of the same may be a breach of contract
             | between the services and IS exceptional) and actually
             | solves a problem.
        
         | Lukabuz wrote:
         | I've been noticing the same thing too. I wonder if the state of
         | the job market over the past couple of years has anything to do
         | with it. More people leaving and taking their knowledge with
         | them, meaning issues are identified/fixed at a slower pace. I
         | know I've seen it happen at the company I work at, but I wonder
         | if big tech similar issues.
        
         | Waterluvian wrote:
         | A colleague got an AWS error saying there weren't enough
         | resources available to provision an EC2 instance and to try a
         | different region or AZ. Not sure how common that is.
        
         | foverzar wrote:
         | Well, there IS a cyberwar happening right now.
        
         | swatcoder wrote:
         | The trend towards cloud architecture has meant consolidating a
         | lot of products onto just a handful of cloud solutions.
         | 
         | You trade a very bubbly flux of outages across countless
         | bespoke deployments, hosts, and topologies for something with
         | failures that are more rare but also more widespread when they
         | occur.
         | 
         | Personally, I think what you're noticing is that outages and
         | failures are much more _high profile_ than they used to be
         | because it's bigger news when these big bubbles burst than it
         | was in that noisier flux where small outages were occurring all
         | the time.
        
       | alx__ wrote:
       | West coast servers having trouble with the heat wave?
        
       | PCloud wrote:
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-09-06 23:00 UTC)