[HN Gopher] How Transistors Work [video] ___________________________________________________________________ How Transistors Work [video] Author : simonebrunozzi Score : 107 points Date : 2022-09-09 17:06 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.youtube.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.youtube.com) | Razengan wrote: | OMG not another water analogy. | | I've never been able to understand what the hell electricity | actually is and how it works. | bhedgeoser wrote: | This should help: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wlw9U2k70o&ab_channel=Redst... | akprasad wrote: | I empathize, though it's a difficult problem: | | > I can't explain that attraction in terms of anything else | that's familiar to you. For example, if we said the magnets | attract like rubber bands, I would be cheating you. Because | they're not connected by rubber bands. I'd soon be in trouble. | And secondly, if you were curious enough, you'd ask me why | rubber bands tend to pull back together again, and I would end | up explaining that in terms of electrical forces, which are the | very things that I'm trying to use the rubber bands to explain. | So I have cheated very badly, you see. So I am not going to be | able to give you an answer to why magnets attract each other | except to tell you that they do. And to tell you that that's | one of the elements in the world - there are electrical forces, | magnetic forces, gravitational forces, and others, and those | are some of the parts. If you were a student, I could go | further. I could tell you that the magnetic forces are related | to the electrical forces very intimately, that the relationship | between the gravity forces and electrical forces remains | unknown, and so on. But I really can't do a good job, any job, | of explaining magnetic force in terms of something else you're | more familiar with, because I don't understand it in terms of | anything else that you're more familiar with. | | https://fs.blog/richard-feynman-on-why-questions/ | thehappypm wrote: | Electricity is almost literally tubing filled with marbles that | all violently repel one another, with the tube violently | attracting the marbles. | | A loop of marble and tube is static: the marbles all push | against each other and are drawn to the tube. | | If you pump some marbles up the tube, they'll clump into other | marbles, which will want to repel. They'll scurry away, pushing | the next barbles, and so on. That pump is a voltage, and the | movement is current. | | A resistor is a sludge that the marbles pass through. They can, | but only if they're being pushed by a voltage. | wyager wrote: | The initial analogy in this video is totally useless. | | In general, though, the water analogy is actually quite good. | The electron gas in conductors behaves a lot like a normal | fluid. It easily covers linear components like resistors, | inductors, and capacitors. Nonlinear components like | transistors and diodes require more extensive analogy that is | no longer very accurate. | | The rest of the video seems pretty good though. | function_seven wrote: | > "electron gas" | | Did you invent this? It's fantastic. Lots of people | misunderstand electricity as just "tiny little balls | colliding with other balls", or think that the electrons | themselves must be zooming around the circuit, rather than | the wave they participate in. | | "Electron gas" sounds right to my ears for these simple | analogies. Just like sound oscillates, but still moves from | speaker to ear, so too does AC current oscillate, but the | energy has a single direction. | marcosdumay wrote: | > so too does AC current oscillate, but the energy has a | single direction | | Sound behaves about the same if you entrap it inside a | tube. The largest difference is that the electron gas is | almost completely incompressible. | [deleted] | deelowe wrote: | I like the term field. It can be very intuitive if you have | ever had a chance to interact with a Van de Graaff | generator. | marshray wrote: | Unfortunately, a 'field' doesn't require electrons or | holes, or provide a way to explain conduction. | wyager wrote: | Definitely not my invention. See also "fermi gas" which is | a generalization. | MoreSEMI wrote: | The nearly free electron gas model is the standard | introduction to explaining conduction in solids. In other | words, no he didn't invent it. Interestingly enough, the | first model for explaining conduction was naively assumed | to be a simple gas model. After quantum mechanics was | introduced into the modeling, it was discovered that while | not quite correct, it was not very far off either. | madengr wrote: | morphle wrote: | Richard Feynman is the best teacher we know (explaining | electricity): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYg6jzotiAc | | He also explains seeing, heat, electro magnetism, elasticity | and mirrors among other things. | | His academic lectures are just as good but too long and hard | for laymen to follow. | | - Every time I switch on an electrical device I hear Feynman | say 'Zzzzinggg' and I see the copper bars jiggling across town. | | - Every time I see a cup of hot liquid I hear Feynman say | "jiggling atoms" | | - Watch his hands and fingers telling the more accurate science | story, simulating the electrons and atoms. | | - I would say that this the most important video to see for any | human being on the planet. De second most important thing would | be half of Alan Kay's lectures https://youtu.be/FvmTSpJU- | Xc?t=2067 | | Great video's to watch with your kids! (from 3-4 years and | older). | jcranmer wrote: | After some thought, here is my stab at explaining what | electricity "actually" is, at least in a way that works well | for classical modelling. (There is a necessary amount of | handwaving and inaccuracies by omission, but I'm trying to keep | it at an ELI5 level). | | All matter is composed of squintillions of tiny things called | "atoms", which are composed of a core having a certain positive | integer (its atomic number) that represents its charge and a | certain number of tinier things whizzing around the core called | electrons. If the number of electrons whizzing around an atom's | core is not the same as the atomic number, the atom gets mad | and will either try to fob excess electrons off to surrounding | atoms or steal them from surrounding atoms (depending on if it | has more or fewer electrons than ideal). | | Thus, if you decide to pick a few atoms and kick electrons out | of them, it starts a chain reaction of electron motion that is | observable on the macroscopic scale. These chain reaction is an | electron current, which is measured as going in the opposite | direction of the way electrons flow because Benjamin Franklin | guessed wrong. The number of electrons flowing in unit time is | the current (as a measurement), measured in amps (approximately | 10 million trillion electrons per second). | | It also turns out that you can vary how ferociously these | electrons are hitting atoms: the voltage (amount of energy per | ~10 million trillion electrons). Different materials are better | or worse at absorbing (or resisting, if you will) the ferocity | of electrons, and this is the resistance. If the resistance is | high enough, it basically becomes impossible for the electrons | to flow, and you get an insulator. | | But how do you get the electrons to start moving in the first | place? The easiest to explain involves chemical reactions: | sometimes, atoms decide they'd rather be in a different | orientation, and in the process of moving to that orientation, | they need to emit some electrons first. With some cleverness, | you can set things up so that electrons have to go around the | "long way" (through a wire), and something that is set up to be | able to do this is more commonly known as a "battery." The | other main way you can do it is by creating changing magnetic | fields, which are kind of created by changing electric | currents, and explaining this in more detail basically requires | throwing away everything I've described, starting from scratch | with the actual physics, and still coming to the realization | that mathematical equations are not satisfactory answers to the | question "what is it." | lxe wrote: | You'll end up teetering between the math, which completely | breaks down intuition about electricity, and analogies, which | keep your understanding a bit grounded. Veritasium's videos on | electricity were an attempt to de-metaphorize electricity, but | they just yielded more questions. | OkayPhysicist wrote: | Electricity is the behavior of electric charge, and electric | charge is an intrinsic property of some particles (it'd be like | asking what mass _is_ , without falling back on what mass | _does_ ). | | Electric charge has a magnitude (arbitrarily, we have labeled | the axis such that protons are positively charged and electrons | are negatively charged, but it's symmetric such that if | everything in the universe swapped positive to negative nothing | would change). Particles with opposite charges attract, | particles with same charges repel. When a source of positive | charge and a source of negative charge are separated, there is | potential energy. We simplify our math a bit by factoring out | the charge that would be moving from the positive to the | negative out of our potential energy calculation to get | "electric potential" or simply "voltage". When there is a path | that charge can flow through between a high potential and low | potential, it creates a flow of charge between positive and | negative sources of charge that we call "current". As the | charge flows, the potential energy decreases, meaning other | energy has to be released. The most common way this happens is | simply by creating heat. Some materials allow charge to flow | through them more easily than others: the ratio of the | potential (voltage) across a component to the rate of electric | charge that flows through it as a result (current) is | approximately constant for most things, and we call that | resistance. This gives us Ohms law : V = IR | ur-whale wrote: | Should be how a BJT (bipolar junction transistor) works. | | The analogy doesn't hold well for FET (field effect). | aerlinger wrote: | This video covers a particular type of transistor known as the | Bipolar Junction Transistors (BJTs). These are more commonly used | in analog applications like amplification and signal processing | rather than digital logic (though they can be used in specialized | digital logic circuits). | | Today, field effect transistors (FETs) reign supreme for most IC | applications such as CPUs and digital logic as they're more | scalable and efficient than BJTs and have a very different | structural design. | marshray wrote: | BJT's are also still used for some very high-power applications | because they can be more efficient at very high currents. | | In fact, they invented a new part that has the "input" gate of | an FET and the Collector-Emitter "output" of a BJT! | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insulated-gate_bipolar_transis... | FunkyDuckk wrote: | FETs are also more common for many analog applications. | lawrenceyan wrote: | And FinFETs are state of the art currently for semiconductor | applications. | adgjlsfhk1 wrote: | technically gate all around is sota, but not yet in | production | commandlinefan wrote: | Any videos on how FET's work? | spullara wrote: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-3p8moNXfI | amelius wrote: | It would be great if someone could turn this into an online | simulation. | gw99 wrote: | As always these things tell us how transistors work, which is | fine and all that, but that's not enough to tell anyone how to | use one which is almost universally done incorrectly even in some | high profile textbooks. They are a little more complicated than | this video can muster. In fact I'd argue that it's probably worth | skipping this and delving into the mathematics properly. | | Wes Hayward W7ZOI explains this side of things rather well in his | book Experimental Methods in RF design. Some of the content is | duplicated here discussing bipolar transistor feedback amplifier | designs: http://w7zoi.net/transistor_models_and_the_fba.pdf | bergenty wrote: | Interesting, I always thought it didn't make a difference how | much current was applied to the emitter, that it was basically a | binary switch above some very small threshold. | westcort wrote: | Here is how I explain it. | | Transistors use a small current to control a larger current. You | can think of this as one person tapping another on the shoulder | of another person. But what good is that? Not much, on its own. | | It is only possible to use this property to store data because | you can build a circuit called a flip flop | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flip-flop_(electronics) that | enables 2 pulses of current to translate into 1 pulse of current. | | That may not seem like much, but it enables everything happening | in modern digital technology. | | So how does it work? | | Let's say you have 5 people in front of you, in a line. Everyone | in line is directed to tap once on the next person for every 2 | taps on their shoulder. So, for you, you feel 2 taps, and then | you tap once. This is what a flip flop does. | | Now, you get an additional instruction. When you are tapping with | your left hand, you raise your right hand and when you are not | tapping with your left hand, you lower your right hand. | | Now, for every tap of the first person, the next person taps half | as often, and the next person in line taps half as often, etc. | | If everyone keeps time, looking at the group of people, you will | see raised arms and lowered arms. The raised arms are 1s and the | people without raised arms are 0s. Now you are counting in | binary. | | In a digital clock, this process is used to translate a quartz | crystal's pulses into counting seconds and time. The same process | can also be used to store numbers. For example, let's say I have | 25 flip flops in series. Now, I can store a number as large as | 2^25 in memory. | sbf501 wrote: | Nice. But that's a BJT in saturation or cutoff. Which is only | part of the story. The magic of a BJT is in quiescent region, | which is like using a crowbar to lift something really heavy: | the lever amplifies your force the same way a little base | current amplifies the Emitter/Collector current. | | Going further, a mosfet doesn't use current to switch, it uses | electric field. I like to say: | | The charge that builds up on the gate from the applied voltage | causes a depeletion(enhancement) region which is like Moses | parting the red sea, so that holes/electrons can move through | it. | mhh__ wrote: | Bob Widlar's notes on this are really good | lxe wrote: | The entire channel is worth subscribing to. | qwertox wrote: | Does anyone have a good recommendation for a lecture on | transistors? Like from Stanford or MIT? | marshray wrote: | http://amasci.com/amateur/transis.html | unethical_ban wrote: | He uses water, which I think tries to touch on the utility of a | transistor and semiconductors. The video should have ended or | been followed up with the reason any of what he described matters | - how transistors are used in computing. | lisper wrote: | There's a book for that: | | https://www.amazon.com/Code-Language-Computer-Hardware-Softw... | unethical_ban wrote: | I own both editions and am re-reading with 2e. | | Thank you for the recommendation, it's a good one. I stand by | my position that the video seems confusing without context. | "Start with Why". | lisper wrote: | It's hard for me to imagine anyone with internet access not | knowing why transistors are important. | ceronman wrote: | This is a good explanation, but I prefer the one by Ben Eater: | | How semiconductor works: https://youtu.be/33vbFFFn04k | | How a transistor works: https://youtu.be/DXvAlwMAxiA | goalieca wrote: | I actually studied with Britney as my mentor in 2nd year EE | https://britneyspears.ac/lasers.htm | mibsl wrote: | Semiconductors - Physics inside Transistors and Diodes | | Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrpPKCDLRN0 | marshray wrote: | Say an NPN BJT is in conduction mode with: | | Vbe = 0.7v, Ib = 1 mA, and Ic = 10 mA. | | In practice, Vce might be 0.2v or so, depending on the | transistor. | | How can Vce < Vbe, when C-B-E essentially form a series circuit? | | I liked this video, but I don't think this model can explain this | observed behavior. | gw99 wrote: | Using that simplified model, it's better to think of it as a | simple diode between B-E and a completely separate current | source between C-E. | | But it's way more complicated than that. | ajross wrote: | I like this one. I like especially that it stops to explain the | junction bias volage and why it becomes the "diode drop" (even if | it doesn't get into the implications), which is IMHO something | most new people struggle with when understanding analog circuit | behavior. Likewise it's careful to explain that the BJT | transistor behavior is due to careful tuning of dopant levels, | something that took me a long time to grok (FETs are easier to | understand). | | The one thing I do wish it would clarify though is that this is | _not_ a FET, and it 's not discussing the kind of circuits used | in digital logic. These are the transistors you se in analog | amplifiers and very old computers. | xor99 wrote: | I have always found it really useful to go back to the first few | examples of a device when learning about its function (e.g. | https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/175004-the-genesis-of-th...). | | Love seeing it in large scale as it becomes just another simple | device like a resistor or potentiometer. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-09-09 23:00 UTC)