[HN Gopher] Argentina's currency exchange black markets ___________________________________________________________________ Argentina's currency exchange black markets Author : mrzool Score : 33 points Date : 2022-09-10 21:08 UTC (1 hours ago) (HTM) web link (devonzuegel.com) (TXT) w3m dump (devonzuegel.com) | gumby wrote: | Decades ago when the Rupee was much more tightly controlled, a | black market flourished for currency exchange. Since I was mostly | visiting family I didn't spend much. At one point I did some | traveling on my own and had plenty of rupees in my pocket. | | In a foreigners' hotel lobby I ran into a kid who was eager to do | a currency exchange. He was really good at it too: he had a | reflexive response for any objection ("I have enough rupees" "But | the bank will only give you 20 for a dollar -- I can give you | 50"). | | Finally he asked, "Don't you have a exchange market for dollars | in your country?" I answered "In my country dollars are just | money" "Yes, same here, so you don't need to go to a bank to | change them for rupees". | | I replied, "In my country I go to the shop to buy a drink and | give dollars to the shopkeeper. He gives me my change in dollars. | There is no exchange rate into any other currency" | | _Finally_ he didn 't have an immediate response. He looked a bit | shocked that there might be a place where people simply | transacted business in dollars. And why shouldn't be be | surprised? He didn't live in such a place and in his experience | all foreigners seemed to use these "dollar" things to buy or sell | rupees. | | Anyway that pause gave me a way to jump out of the conversation | and make my escape. | hahaxdxd123 wrote: | I know some US startups that hire Argentinians (Scale AI, etc) | and pay them in USD-T or USD-C. Not sure if they pay any taxes in | the US, but they certainly don't pay the income tax or take the | currency conversion haircut in Argentina. Pretty good deal. | | Still, these people want USD, not really a crypto. I figure some | lost their shirts in UST. | IMTDb wrote: | How is Argentina supposed to pay for public services, teachers, | doctors, education, roads, etc if the conception is that a | "Pretty good deal" means the country does not get any tax money | through competent, employed individuals who are supposed to be | the one supporting those costs ? | notch656a wrote: | All those things can be acquired privately. It is possible to | buy things without using tax money. | colechristensen wrote: | Argentina has trade deficit problems. Black markets and | cryptocurrencies don't fix these problems just push the burdens | of them onto other people who can't as easily get around the | legal currency framework. | k__ wrote: | Don't know about their trade deficit, but I talked to a few | people living there and they said, crypto is the only way for | them. | | Their own currency is unusable, and the government limits how | much dollar they buy. | msoad wrote: | This article is pro-cryptocurrency but they fail to see that in | some spans of time (recently) Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies | lost more value than Argentine Peso. | | Again, cryptocurrencies are not solving anything. | k__ wrote: | DAI and USDC are pretty stable, especially if in the face of | the recent crashes that took BTC and ETH down. | notch656a wrote: | DAI is imminently dead by .gov pulling a Tornado Cash on all | the underlying centralized collateral locked up in DAI. | JumpCrisscross wrote: | > _by .gov pulling a Tornado Cash on all the underlying | centralized collateral locked up in DAI_ | | I doubt the U.S. would simply blow up stablecoins. (Unless | _e.g._ the Kremlin is buying Iranian munitions with it and | nobody does anything to stop it.) That said, coming | regulation _will_ likely require elements of KYC. That | could result in enforcement actions or users in back-of- | mind countries getting locked out. | | All of which sidesteps dollar stablecoins being reliant on | the dollar for their stability, not anything special about | crypto. | notch656a wrote: | What's the value proposition of DAI with KYC? | Karrot_Kream wrote: | There are plenty of folks who are comfortable with KYC | but also want to use dollars as cryptocurrency. | [deleted] | seibelj wrote: | How to understand central banking and the fiat currency system: | | All money is a coin created by a national government. USD is | America Coin, Sterling is UK coin, Yen is Japan coin, etc. | | Within the boundaries of the nation, everyone uses the national | coin. | | All goods and services are produced somewhere. If produced and | consumed in the same nation, the same coin is used. | | Things get interesting with international trade. All countries | cannot produce every single last thing they want. So they have to | purchase from other countries. And the other countries require | the use of their own coin when buying their goods and services. | | Exporters get paid in their nation's coin, which becomes an | important source of foreign currency for the central bank / | government. More exports = more conversion into the nation's coin | = more forex. If a car exporter sells cars, the central bank will | facilitate payment to them in local coin, but the central bank | will take and store the forex. | | Things get very interesting (and corrupt) with imports. In any | given nation, there is only so much forex. If you try to acquire | more forex (like USD) by printing more local coin and then | trading it for USD, you will get inflation. So countries with | well managed central banks try and avoid this. So who can use the | limited USD to import what they want becomes subject to political | will. Often politically favored firms get access to the USD to | buy the goods and materials they need, which they then sell | locally. If there simply isn't any more USD to buy stuff, | competitors can't enter to be an importer. | | As the most important good in the entire world - oil - is traded | almost exclusively in USD, every country has an everlasting and | unquenching thirst for USD. This gives the US enormous power, as | it can print more money with way less risk of inflation than | other countries can. It also lets the US get ever cheaper goods | and services from abroad with such demand for a good that takes a | mouse click to produce (USD). | | Bitcoin (and other cryptos if they can be successful) is | extremely dangerous to this model because it is not controlled by | any government. It is exactly like the old gold system, except | way better because you don't need to protect the gold with | soldiers and vaults, move it with huge ships, and so on. It's | gold on the internet. | | If goods start being priced in Bitcoin directly, it will be akin | to the old global system of everything being priced in gold. | | But in general, think of fiat money like coins and central banks | as a single centralized validator node that has sole authority to | mint new coins. | JumpCrisscross wrote: | > _the most important good in the entire world - oil - is | traded almost exclusively in USD_ | | This isn't true and hasn't been for decades. Oil is just a | special case of the far larger American import wallet, the real | underpinning--together with its capital markets' strength | [1]--of U.S. dollar hegemony. | | [1] | https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-03-16/saudi-... | setgree wrote: | This essay was previously published elsewhere on 8/13: | https://www.freethink.com/technology/crypto-argentina-black-... | AlbertCory wrote: | In 1982, I went to Czechoslovakia (this was before the divorce | and before the fall of the Wall), and walking around the streets | of Prague, people constantly whispered to me, a visibly foreign | person, "Change money? Change money?" Dollars or German marks | were what they wanted, and I could have gotten a much better | exchange rate than the official one, if that was what I wanted. | | Now? The author's comment that most people use a _cueva_ to | handle the crypto for them, rather than managing it themselves, | is a real-world datapoint. It means that _cuevas_ are vulnerable | to surveillance and control. | | > The way I explain this to myself, it seems that the key | characteristic that draws Argentinians to these relatively | centralized cryptocurrencies is that the government doesn't | control them, rather than being completely decentralized in a way | that no one controls them. | | The government doesn't control them _now_. What do you bet there | are armies of programmers working for the government, figuring | out how they can? | | So if I lived there, I'd probably be using crypto, too, but I'd | always be afraid it's going to vanish someday. Not by the | government devaluing the peso, which Argentines are used to, but | by some unforeseen technical snafu. | | So I'd probably spread my bets around, having some US $100's, | some bricks, and some of other coins, making sure not to have all | my eggs in one basket. | verisimi wrote: | > Argentinians have also learned to not trust banks, even with | accounts denominated in other currencies. In 2001-2002, the | government enacted something called "el corralito", shutting | Argentinians' access to their bank accounts for almost a year. | When they could finally extract money again, they found that (a) | their USD deposits had to be exchanged for pesos and (b) pesos | had lost 2/3 of their value. | | That couldn't possibly happen in the West. Its only those silly | Argentinians that have to worry about this sort of stuff... | right? | Cupertino95014 wrote: | If you look at inflation numbers between 1968 and 1981, it did | happen in the US -- just not by 2/3. | | Those sorts of massive bank controls, though... no, not yet, in | the US anyway. Let's not talk about Canada. | tomjakubowski wrote: | I always considered Argentina part of "the west" - it's in the | western hemisphere and the common language is Spanish, along | with other cultural connections to Spain. What definition are | you using? | [deleted] ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-09-10 23:00 UTC)