[HN Gopher] The potential of mobile housing ___________________________________________________________________ The potential of mobile housing Author : jseliger Score : 49 points Date : 2022-09-11 16:10 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.sightline.org) (TXT) w3m dump (www.sightline.org) | ww520 wrote: | People need to see the downsides of owning a RV. | | https://youtu.be/IP_u2JR51_Y | transfire wrote: | What if build a Lost in Space style spaceship... I mean house. | Where can I legally locate it? | golemiprague wrote: | I don't see how one storey on wheels is going to solve anything. | The main cost is the land, a decent mobile home will not cost | much less than a house of the same size. Once everybody are going | to roam around in their mobile house the cost of parking land and | infrastructure will be exactly the same but with added strain on | the roads and cost of fuel to move those houses around. Not to | mention the psychological cost of being a nomad with no roots and | no community, especially with children. In addition not every | country has so many empty spaces like the US, in many countries | even a single storey home is something only rich people can | afford and most people live in apartment buildings, like in NY | city. Why not just build high buildings with various sizes of | apartments, not too many limiting zoning laws and good public | transportation like they do in Tokyo for example? This is already | a proven way to solve those issues. | AtlasBarfed wrote: | Yeah the article is about semi-mobile non-RV houses, but really | it's the same use case as an upscale RV. | | Between solar panels, an EV drivetrain which comes with a HUGE | battery for running appliances, skateboard design for more space, | better acceleration/handling/regen braking, room for a "range | extension" ICE generator as backup, and the final killer killer | feature: | | ... stay with me ... | | Highway self-driving, even if it's just supervisory. | | I'd sell everything I own and live in a mobile home. If it drove | me between places at night with better-than-human safety (and | maybe a big huge airbag in the bedroom)... my god. | | Keep in mind that highway self driving should be much much easier | than general self driving. You can get convergent evolution of | the infrastructure with embedded sensors and warning broadcasts. | You can get highly optimized pre-calculated route "programs" | rather than rely entirely on some generally trained AI agent. | You'll have a lot more room for sensors. You don't have to travel | as fast at night either, so the RV can putter along at 40mph for | excellent energy efficiency and better safety, and not offend any | daytime drivers. | | When it gets to the destination, if you don't wake up there can | be huge self-driving parking lots where the RV can park (and | recharge) while you wake up. | | And the picture in the article says a 1000 words: I really like a | design of a house where there is a central courtyard and a bunch | of buildings around it. Japanese houses (well, the rich ones in | anime and stuff) were designed like this. Your mobile home could | simply drive up to part of that courtyard, and become part of | your house. Need a new bedroom? buy a new segment and plop it | next to the courtyard. | | COVID kind of killed a lot of commuting, but the idea of my | bedroom driving me to work in the morning is a good one, and if | you need to drop a #2 at work you can walk out to the RV and do | it there (I'm not a huge fan of crapping in public bathrooms, but | that might just be me, the #1 thing I like about WFH is crapping | in my bathroom). Heck you'll have a shower and a change of | clothes and a place to nap if you need it at work. Supports | longer hours if you need it. If the RV has an attached office, | and your workers tend to have this, you can simply have a pop-up | office where a smaller building has meeting rooms but people work | in their RV-offices. | | Your RV can drive you home in traffic while you get the last | couple hours of work done, so even 100 mile commutes can be | tolerable. | | Currently the RV industry, as I understand it is based in Indiana | mostly, is pretty slow to change. It astonishes me that RVs | haven't been hybrid drivetrains for a decade (that relates to my | frustration that PHEVs weren't forced in adoption in the 2000s, | 10 years after the prius and insight hit the market). I guess the | pickup trucks never adopted the drivetrain, but there were hybrid | SUVs in droves ten years ago. | | I think the Tesla semi and other BEV semis will be what does it. | You can take a short range BEV semi and make it longer range with | an attached ICE generator for the long haul. I'm hoping that | "inside out" rotary or other small engine designs optimized for | battery recharging can work here. | | With the skyrocketing cost of housing, would you rather have a | luxurious mobile home for 500k and spend 300k for a house in the | boonies, or have a 1 million dollar crap house closer to the job? | | And right now RVs are kind of expensive because they are too | bespoke. If demand skyrockets due to all the advantages listed | above, we may actually get economies of scale in housing, since | the footprints are all shipping container sized essentially. | Heck, the skateboard design of an EV may mean that the entire | drivetrain is simply an underbody and the top living part is | relatively swappable. | | Also, some BEV drivetrains (million mile battery) may be far more | long term and reliable, a lot of RVs have an issue of ricketly | ICE drivetrains that don't age well. | yourapostasy wrote: | Check out National Indoor RV Centers (NIRVC). They are a | perfect signal of the terrible engineering of even current | high-end Class A's because they built their business around how | much these contraptions need servicing. They themselves do an | awesome job of that servicing, but generally the industry needs | to ship marine grade engineering design and instead mostly opts | for very unsustainable and marginally serviceable designs that | don't nearly stand up to what marine engineers are expected to | deliver. I wish there was a Dashew for RV's. | | If there is highway self driving in the near future for RV's, | I'd expect it to piggyback onto what the commercial trucking | industry builds and uses. | foxhop wrote: | your dream is my nightmare having to share road with a mobile | bedroom on the highway with person in bed, you know that's | essentially illegal right now, passengers should be seated & | belted... giant airbag... good grief. | zxexz wrote: | I'm amusing myself thinking about a giant airbag for a sleeping | person. I can't think how anything like that could work. | Airbags in cars work effectively by inflating near instantly in | a car crash, cushioning the occupant from the near | instantaneous >27G (iirc) deceleration. Seatbelts do this very | effectively, especially with the crumple zones of a modern car. | An airbag keeps your head from decelerating against the | steering wheel. I'd imagine an effective safety mechanism for a | bed going at 40mph would be something more akin to a really | tight blanket affixed to the bed, which itself was bolted to | the floor, to take advantage of the protection of the crumple | zones of the vehicle. So basically a cocoon. | badrabbit wrote: | One of the main appeals of a house is having a backyard and a | garage. I can't tinker with and work on various project ideas or | get certain pets because I live in an apartment,that won't change | with mobile homes, you just end up doing your own maintenance, | still make payments on it and pay a few hundred bucks to park the | mobile home. | | There should be giant city-buildings with hundreds of thousands | of dwelling spaces each with a large outdoor patio. A lot of | problems like power distribution from certain powersources get | resolved with this as well as many other resources like fresh | water and fresh food (land is freed up for agriculture),waste | disposal,transportation, medical care,etc... | | The urban sprawl made sense in the nuclear era but I believe the | technology exists to make highly defensible mega buildings (10s | of miles wide,50+ stories high). | revolvingocelot wrote: | Sounds like you and Buckminister Fuller would have gotten | along. [0] Count me in, too. That said, if the 70s couldn't | birth a few concrete proto-arcologies, I'm not sure it's ever | going to be politically possible. | | [0] | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Man_River%27s_City_project | ianai wrote: | It definitely requires a culture level buy-in. Maybe places | already having high density populations could birth such a | project. But that's a catch22 itself. | badrabbit wrote: | Yes it would. My idea was to start with the california | coastline. Have it be very close to the ocean. 100k units | facing the ocean, it makes it both economically viable | (people will pay for it) and help bring housing prices and | homelessness down. You will also have to fight a lot less | NIMBY battles. The main problem is you need to commit | billions of dollars to start with. The rent/hoa alone is | probably not gonna give good ROI short term but having so | many people there means a potential to design a very | profitable center of economic activity. Ideally, the lowest | levels would be stores. You would also be providing them | with their supermarket, mall,hospitals,etc.... with an | average total household income of 80k that's at least | 3-4billion/year | ianai wrote: | Wouldn't you need 400k units for 3-4 billion with that | income per household? | | I suppose on the ocean would be interesting if it were | tied with some desalination and generally using the ocean | sustainably. | | One way to kick that sort of thing off might be | individual, modular units which could be brought together | to make ever larger complexes. | badrabbit wrote: | Rent plus,groceries and most bills, if that is at least | 50% of income (rent alone is typically a third of income) | on 80k/yr that is 40k * 100k = 4B. Even with just 1500/mo | rent that is 1.8B gross/yr and 18B in 10 years if net | profit is only a 3rd of that (assuming it won't collect | taxes like cities!) it will be 6B/10y. My point is, to | recover costs in 10 years, you need to make it at a cost | of 60k/unit which seems low but I am hoping economy of | scale would make things cheaper. Like, it would make | sense to have your own factories close by just for the | concrete,wiring,etc... but at least with 100k/unit | cost(10B) it should still be possible and the recovery | time isn't too bad given mortgages go 30+ years. And | picking a good location can guarantee occupancy. | octoberfranklin wrote: | No, the main problem with your plan is the California | Coastal Commission. | thrown_22 wrote: | >There should be giant city-buildings with hundreds of | thousands of dwelling spaces each with a large outdoor patio. A | lot of problems like power distribution from certain | powersources get resolved with this as well as many other | resources like fresh water and fresh food (land is freed up for | agriculture),waste disposal,transportation, medical care,etc... | | This only works so long as they don't shade each other. Which | means you end up with something like the Line from Saudi Arabia | or ground level NYC where you're lucky to see the sun at noon. | badrabbit wrote: | Ideally they would be on mountains or have a pyramid like | crescent shaped outline that is south facing so all units get | sunlight and can grow vegetation,etc... | geoduck14 wrote: | I've seen people rent storage units, and use _them_ as "garage | project locations". Mind you, they had to drive a mile to the | storage unit. | | Would that meet any of your needs? | brippalcharrid wrote: | A person doesn't need to add much friction to a hobby that | they would otherwise dabble in opportunistically during their | leisure time for it to become a pursuit that isn't practical | without structuring various other things in their life around | it. If people had to drive to a self-storage unit to watch | television or partake in baking, I imagine we'd see rates of | television viewership and baking go way down. | badrabbit wrote: | I don't know what the restrictions are but I have one within | walking distance, I will look into that, thanks for the | suggestion. My only concern is for safety and liability | reasons they may not allow things like welding and working | with chemicals that require good ventilation that and noise | are the main restrictions with apartments. | xani_ wrote: | Friction is the problem here. Even if it is 5 minute walk, | well, it's PITA in winter, and the moment you have to move | anything bigger than a backpack. | | 10 minute and 15 minute task turns into 10 + 15 + 10 minute | task. | | Any longer and you're pretty much talking "I either go there | for half a day or it is not worth it". | | Like, if there is no other option sure, but else it's major | PITA for hobbies, something that's supposed to be fun. | | It would be cool if it was for example a bunch of rooms to | rent in basement of apartment complex, but even then I can't | imagine them being big enough (or with door big enough) to | say work on a car. | entropicgravity wrote: | Why not just make it a largeish van like a long, tall Sprinter? | All electric will make everything work more reliably and way more | practical and cheaper(eventually). | molotovh wrote: | These are definitely being done, but in many cases, the well- | done ones cost more than a trailer home. Look up some of the | van life channels on You Tube; most of them have early videos | detailing the cost outlays required. It's a lot easier to get a | loan of $90k for something that technically qualifies as a home | vs. a loan of $150k+ for what the bank considers a recreational | vehicle. | xrd wrote: | One on hand, you've got Adam Neumann and his new startup | providing new types of homes for the endlessly mobile young | worker. On the other hand, you've got proposals like this one in | Oregon, my home state, which has many problems. | | HB2001, if I understand it correctly, forces all cities over 25k | to allow multiple homes, duplexes and quadplexes, on any plot. | But the problem is, you can't add them if you already have | something on there, and try finding an empty lot in the Portland | metropolitan area under $250k. I certainly did. | | Sadly, I'm betting Adam Neumann will win here. Too much money to | lobby and align with the tides. | moistly wrote: | > for the endlessly mobile young worker | | How does this differ from what we used to call the "Displaced | Person"? | hollywood_court wrote: | I lived in a mobile home from 1st grade until I left home at 16. | | My own family will never live in a mobile home. Regardless of the | sacrifices required, I will never have them experience that. | | In addition to the safety concerns, it's a poor financial | decision. | | I replaced two water heaters and a toilet in a mobile home for a | realtor about 18 months ago. | | I was shocked that the trailer was listed for $90k and sold the | next week. | | We've got to do a better job of teaching financial literacy in | this country. | Syonyk wrote: | Genuinely curious, what's wrong with a mobile/manufactured | home? Do you object to the "trailer park" aspect, or simply the | entire concept of the structure? | | I'm a detached, on-our-own-land double wide with a foundation, | and I've no problems with the house at all. It's a higher end | manufactured, we have drywall, quartz counters, upgraded | electrical, etc, but... most people don't even realize it's a | manufactured unless they already know what to look for (strong | marriage line, all the water on one half of the house, etc). | hollywood_court wrote: | Mostly the quality and safety aspects. I made all of my money | with my trades. My first and most lucrative trade is | carpentry. There is no way anyone will ever be able to | convince me that a mobile home is as safe as a traditional | built home. | | I spent many an anxious night as a child in Alabama fearful | that I wouldn't live until the next morning due to inclement | weather. | | And they are depreciating assets. I come from a single parent | violent home where I had to leave before I even finished high | school. I somehow managed to become what I am with nothing | but a high school education. I worked hard and sacrificed a | lot to escape that lifestyle. I don't want my own child to | see me ever make poor financial decisions. | | Edit: The above makes me sound like an incredible asshole. So | the best answer would be: there are far better ways to spend | my money and energy than on a mobile home. Ways that are | better at ensuring my family's safety and financial | wellbeing. | Syonyk wrote: | Can I ask what rough year the homes you're familiar with | were built in? And if you've been around anything ~recent | (2010 or later)? The standards changed in the 80s, and | quality has continued improving since then. | | If your experience with mobile homes is pre-1980 or so, | yes, they were... sketchy. But in the late 70s, the | standards changed rather dramatically, so experience with | older manufactured homes doesn't really translate. None of | the older ones (within a rounding error) meet the newer | standards. | | I've got 2x6 exterior walls, a concrete foundation with the | house quite tied into that, a metal roof, drywall, etc. | I've also done a factory tour, and was quite impressed with | how everything was put together. They're able to do things | like "assemble the roof separately at a safe working height | and then tie it to the rest of the house without having to | do roof work," so lower insurance rates and such for | workers. | | It's a bit noisier in high winds than I'd prefer, and the | combination of metal roof and vaulted ceilings make the | rain sound harder than it actually is, but it doesn't rain | _that_ often out here, so... not going to complain too hard | about that. | | I wish the local tax authorities would agree with you that | it's a depreciating asset, though. They certainly like to | argue that the value keeps going up (and as I get the | property and house tax bills separately, I can see the | house-only values climbing rapidly - I didn't do the | paperwork to merge them, as I simply don't care). | | You're clearly opposed to the concept, which is fine, but I | just don't see any of your assertions being true of | manufactured homes from the past... oh, 20 years or so. I | know an awful lot of people who live in them, though it's | not "mobile home parks" - they're just a standard enough | style of housing out where I live, usually on foundations. | And I consider having spent less money on a perfectly | suitable house than having something built onsite to be a | very reasonable financial decision. | hollywood_court wrote: | The mobile home I grew up in was a 1987 Sunbeam. I've | been in and out of hundreds during the course of my | career. For the past 12 years my base of operations has | been a college town where it is popular for parents to | buy trailers for their children while they attend | college. I made a great deal of money repairing those | trailers which allows for my (maybe worthless) anecdotes. | | The accessories and fittings like faucets and toilets and | such are often lower than "builder grade" which is | perfect for someone like me who makes repairs, but not so | good for the home owner. | | Is your mobile home on a cinder block perimeter | foundation or a slab? I imagine the slab would allow for | a great deal more peace of mind, but the cinder block | perimeter would not. | | You're absolutely correct that I am a bit biased and am | opposed to the concept. But I'm also opposed to owning | any vehicle that isn't a Honda/Acura or a Toyota/Lexus. | Simply because my shop never made any money repairing | those just like I never made much money repairing modern | traditional homes built by credible and competent | builders. | | Depending on where you're located in the US, if you're | going to raise a family in a mobile home please at least | consider having an underground storm shelter installed. | That would allow for more peace of mind. I lost a few | friends in high school due to storms when they lived in | mobile homes. And more recently I lost a handful of | clients who perished when storms ripped through | Beauregard, AL. | Syonyk wrote: | I'm on a proper concrete foundation with 4' stem walls - | related to the slope of the hill. It's not cinder block. | | Our major risks are local grass fires, not tornadoes - | rural mountain west. If we got one out here, it would be | quite the freak event. | rdtwo wrote: | Mobile housing is only good as a way of getting wrong either | permits or local labor shortages | 8jef wrote: | Most people here comment on past experiences involving 1970's | mobile homes in trailer parks, people living in cars, and large | RVs. | | Modern mobile housing, as per the article, is different. It's | about large vans or tiny homes built on trailers, not made to | permanently sit on ciment blocks. Not necessarily with children | in it. | | Anyway, where there's a will there's a way. With over 1M people | living the vanlife in the US alone, we are not far from future | outdoor and/or indoor private communities regrouping migrating | short term tenants. A bit like camping grounds, but geared toward | vanlifers. | moistly wrote: | Yah, why advocate for real housing, when we can just stuff people | into 100sq.ft. mobile tiny homes. That way we can ensure the | working poor never set down roots or enjoy the stability of a | neighbourhood; we'll be able to keep them moving, always | travelling to the next temporary wage-slave job. Brilliant idea, | Tim, fuckin' brillo! Why should we ever aim higher than that! | | Next, let's stack the tiny homes. Kowloon Walled City, here we | come! | jaclaz wrote: | Mobile tiny home which costs US$ 10,000 [1] according to the | Author, that then proceeds to illustrate it with the picture of | a non-mobile (and not so tiny) house that was estimated US$ | 25,000 _in 2016_ [2] | | [1] What? [2] and which at first sight won't be anything less | than US$ 50,000-60,000 today | moistly wrote: | I just looked up tandem 10000lb flat deck trailers, e.g. | suitable platform on which to build a tiny home. | | They're about $5000 a pop. Maybe if you steal everything from | a construction site, a tiny home could be built for $10K. | toomuchtodo wrote: | Real talk, a tiny home we'll equipped will run $40k to | $100k; you only get close to the low end with lower end | materials and supplying the labor yourself (I've helped | build and haul to their final location more than one). | | With that said, the greatest challenge is the stigma of a | trailer park. The local community NIMBYs fight _hard_ to | not permit new communities from being established (speaking | as someone who optioned a parcel of land in central Florida | for this purpose and had to go plead the case at planning | meetings), and existing ones are getting snapped up by | private equity and real estate investors to turn the | financial screws on people who have nowhere else to go. | | https://www.npr.org/2022/05/11/1098193173/what-happens- | when-... | | https://rejournals.com/investors-appetite-for- | manufactured-h... | | I think this model works as a coop or non profit land | trust, where the resident owns the home but the community | protects their stake in the lot. Think "A Tiny Home For | Good" Tiny Home Park Edition. You need to defend against | the Capital vultures. | | https://www.atinyhomeforgood.org/ | | (Tangentially, someone from YC should reach out to the | above non profit to have them go through their next non | profit accelerator cycle) | notch656a wrote: | Tiny home dream for me died once I found out I couldn't | park it as primary residence on residential zoned land in | my city. Any big cities where you can do this and own the | property? Paying rent for a house you own in the clear is | a non-starter. | toomuchtodo wrote: | All zoning is local. You'll have to research prospective | locales to understand the nuance. Tiny homes kept on | trailers are done for a reason; to be regulated as RVs | instead of a fixed structured, avoiding typical ADU or | structure to lot size ratio issues. | hattmall wrote: | You can build a permanent structure that's the bare | minimum really cheaply and then just park the tiny home | there, and that really only matters if you want to get | grid utilities. | xrd wrote: | Are you still in Central Florida? Maybe you never | actually were, just optioned the land? I'm a recent | migrant to this area and would be interested in hearing | more about the challenges of this region. Where can I | learn more about what you are doing? | klyrs wrote: | I had some stigma against trailer parks, but due to | housing costs, I got serious about them once. I could | actually afford a home on my single salary! That got my | hopes up. There was even a trailer park near me, close to | transit, close to a grocery store, close to some nice | parks, it even had some vacancies! Awesome. | | But then I looked at the terms. The trailer park is on a | 99 year lease, coming up in about 5 years. The homes are | the property of their owners, the land is not. Most of | the homes are functionally immobile. A new build is more | expensive than buying used, so to get an actually mobile | home doubles the cost -- add disposal fees to that. | | Trailer park residents are living on the edge, a ticking | timebomb where they might get evicted without the ability | to move their homes, or if they're lucky, they can move | their homes but they'll still be forced out of their | neighborhood at a time when all their neighbors are also | trying to move under duress to the same closest trailer | parks they can find. And if they can't find a place, they | lose the home and pay for its disposal. | | The stigma is real, but it's not the greatest challenge. | The soaring land prices are. | moistly wrote: | Around here, the lease-land mobile-like homes are | retirement communities. It is admittedly getting close to | the time when we'll see community-wide leasing agreements | come up for renegotiation. The concept really works out | well for the Boomer-aged. Good luck if you're a Gen Z. | | Freehold land prices are up ten-fold. Lease rates? TBD. | aaron695 wrote: | forgotmypw17 wrote: | I loved out of a minivan for 1.5 years and it was one of the best | experiences I've had. Cost almost nothing, too. | notch656a wrote: | Is there anyway to do this without having CPS seize your | children or the school refusing their enrollment? Theoretically | if you live in a minivan can you just park it in the best | school district and have at it? | voxic11 wrote: | In the US if a child meets the definition of homeless in the | McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act then schools must | allow them to register without proof of residency. Children | living in cars meet this definition. | | Note though that homeless students can still be required to | provide reasonable proof of residency in order to receive an | admission _preference_ based on where they are temporarily | living. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McKinney%E2%80%93Vento_Homeles. | .. | notch656a wrote: | That sounds awesome. Might be worth looking into the best | school district in the US and buying a minivan, if that | life is amazing as it sounds. Property taxes would be non- | existent. Wonder if we could just get 2 or 3 minivans and | make a 'room' out of each one. You could use one to tow the | other ones every 3rd day to avoid violating park laws, so | they wouldn't even all have to run. | rdtwo wrote: | Yeah just imagine the abuse your kid would get for living | out of a van. The other kids would mock and bully your | kids merciless | hattmall wrote: | I'm 99% certain it would completely suck with children. | It could be cool on your own, or maybe even as a couple, | but with kids I can't see it. Not to mention the social | stigma the kids would face at school, especially in the | best district. | forgotmypw17 wrote: | I'm not so certain, if only because how many obstacles | and problems people imagined for me when I told them the | idea, compared with how surprisingly easy it was when I | actually went for it. | | I think mindset is still the biggest factor. | | For example, there are all sorts of things you can get | picked on for at school, and I think the most important | bit is teaching them to navigate the process itself. | forgotmypw17 wrote: | It's certainly more complicated if you have human children, | especially if they're "on the grid" (not everyone's are). | | I have very little knowledge in this area, so I won't offer | advice. CPS is definitely a risk, and you have to navigate | that. | alar44 wrote: | Did you work during that time? Living in a minivan and | vacationing in a minivan are 2 drastically different things. | forgotmypw17 wrote: | At different times, I did part-time remote work, which was | more than enough to sustain me, worked as a home assistant | for a family member, and did not work at all (living | primarily freegan lifestyle then) | hotpotamus wrote: | Was it down by the river? | forgotmypw17 wrote: | Very often it was. It is one of the best places to park. By | the lake and by the ocean is great too. You can go for a swim | first thing in the morning. | danny_codes wrote: | What did you do for showering, cooking, etc? | jrgoff wrote: | I lived out of a tent for a couple of summers. Getting a gym | membership was an easy way for me to have access to showers. | At the time I mostly just ate food that didn't require | cooking though I certainly could have used a camp stove | easily. | forgotmypw17 wrote: | I showered less frequently, but there are many options out | there, such as: | | Friends and allies, beach and camping showers, gyms, pirate | bath. | | I did not cook much, and just ate things like nuts, bread, | and cheese. But I had a simple wood stove that runs on little | sticks. (Look up rocket can stove.) | | Generally speaking, for most things, it was just a matter of | "stay calm and improvise". | AlexandrB wrote: | There's a 15 minute documentary about the takeover of the mobile | housing industry by large conglomerates: | https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9DQa3Ajhzv8 | | The key takeaway is that many/most of the people living in this | kind of housing cannot afford the expense of moving it (video | gives a price tag of around $5000), especially on short notice. | Older mobile homes may not have enough remaining structural | integrity to be moved at all. Meanwhile the land their house is | on is rented and they can still be evicted _from the land_ at | anytime which typically results in the loss of the home that they | "own". | | This catch 22 means that residents are seen as ripe for rent and | fee increases since moving means losing their investment in the | home. | | I'm sure mobile housing is great for middle class people looking | for a nomadic lifestyle where they plan to move their home from | time to time. As low-income housing though, it seems mobile homes | are in a nasty grey area between renting and owning. | Quequau wrote: | There are broad swaths of non-rural residential spaces which | are zoned to excluded most mobile homes. These facts are part | of what is driving the popularity of "Tiny Houses on Wheels". | hollywood_court wrote: | Whenever my wife and I buy a piece of land, we always make | sure to be certain that no mobile homes will be allowed | anywhere near the borders. | evandwight wrote: | Why? | gardenfelder wrote: | One version I've heard is the concern that land value | will decline if neighboring property turns into a kind of | holding grounds for run-down, ill-maintained old | trailers. It does seem like our vernacular in this space | is ripe for change; perhaps "homes on wheels" is teasing | open that door... | dylan604 wrote: | My family bought one of the very first lots in a new lake | front property development way back in the 60s. After a | very slow sale of these other lots in the development, | the developer halved the size of the lots and opened them | for mobile homes. The lots sold, the mobile homes moved | in, and my family's property valued plummeted. | | There were more than a few neighbors that fit the very | stereotype you imagine, and they were the ones that lived | there full time. Most of the direct neighbors were just | weekenders (as were we). | pasquinelli wrote: | sounds like a good outcome to me. more affordable housing | and all it costs is a drop in the resale value of | vacation homes, (that also comes with a drop in property | taxes for those same vacation homes.) | hollywood_court wrote: | It's attitudes like this that have caused my wife and I | to build our forever home in the middle of a a huge plot | of land. The house will not be visible from the road and | I'll be able to fire a gun in any direction without | worrying about hitting anything or anyone. We've both | grown weary of allowing our comfort to be dictated by | neighbors and however they decide to behave on a | particular day. | xani_ wrote: | Well, unless you're a sucker that saved whole life to buy | that home and now half the value is worse and | neighbourhood is shit... | | But maybe we shouldn't let private companies decide on | things like land usage in the first place... | ReactiveJelly wrote: | Who has the right to live and move where is a problem | older than humanity | colinsane wrote: | older than humanity? | | i guess in the sense that we aren't the only animals to | enforce territory. on the other hand we probably are the | only animals to have conceived of "rights". | hollywood_court wrote: | That sounds like Lake Martin in Alabama. | hollywood_court wrote: | After living in a mobile home park for most of my | childhood, I don't want those kind of neighbors. | | The folks that think it's wise to spend $70k+ on a | trailer are often the same folks who think it's ok to | have multiple broken down cars in the yard and/or | multiple unfixed and unrestrained dogs running around | and/or the worst of all: people who don't see the irony | of waving a Gadsden flag right next to their thin blue | line flag. | moistly wrote: | Let's be honest: it varies widely. There are parks with | age restrictions: they tend to be okay. There are parks | that do enforce their bylaws, including visual | appearances, and they're pretty good. A well-managed | small park of newer double-wides and larger pads can be a | nice place to live. | | As with all housing, there are good neighbourhoods and | bad. Hell, my in-law is in a nice millionaires | neighbourhood and his immediate next-door neighbour is a | swinging cokehead wife abuser who throws ragers every few | months. It's hell, but the properties are all freehold: | short of a lawsuit, ain't nothing to be done. | hollywood_court wrote: | I shouldn't have specified "mobile home parks." In my | personal experience, the people who buy plots of land and | move mobile homes in are often worse than anything you'll | find in a mobile home park. | | The park I grew up in had some rules and regulations, but | everything goes whenever you buy a plot of land out in | the county. | moistly wrote: | Ah, yes, the infamous small acreage with an old, failing | mobile home. I grew up in the wilds. Many of the people | were not living in town for good reason. It was not an | environment packed with high-functioning people. A lot of | abusive families. A lot of hard-scrabble survival. | Avicebron wrote: | I can confirm, just down the street there are two mobile | homes. (Within less than a few minutes walking distance, | before they were evicted, one of these homes had several | instances of domestic violence, repeated calls to the | animal control who on entering the house found several | dogs days into starvation eating their own feces from | hunger (they also would growl and bark at anyone | attempting to walk or bike down the road). They were | close enough that every so often we could hear the angry | yelling for hours on end as the woman and her partner(s?) | would fight. The other one, while quieter has | approximately 3 unused vehicles, assorted junk, and lots | of other good stuff dangerously close to spilling on to | the neighbor territory, I'm living in a very rural state | and can assure you this is the norm | hollywood_court wrote: | I'm well aware that it's the norm unfortunately. You | could have just described any of my mothers numerous | neighbors. | chrisco255 wrote: | Whenever I buy a piece of land, I make certain there are as | few restrictions on the use of that land and that no NIMBYs | or HOA types are anywhere near the borders. | hollywood_court wrote: | I don't blame you. HOAs are the worst. I've never owned | property with an HOA. | smegsicle wrote: | "buying a house but renting everything that doesn't depreciate" | cbsmith wrote: | This is the main catch that the article skips over. | pessimizer wrote: | It's only profitable to rent the things to you that you would | be better off buying. | lotsofpulp wrote: | Rental cars, hotel room, and certain machinery/tools? | Owning something has costs too, and if you are not | interested in learning how to or paying someone else to | maintain and secure something, then it can make sense to | not buy it also. | | I need a vibrating plate compactor once in 10 years, and | Home Depot has a stream of customers who need it all the | time. I could buy it and rent it to others when I am not | using it, but I have other things I want to do with my | time. Therefore, it is profitable for Home Depot to rent it | to me, and for me to pay a slight premium to never have to | worry about it outside the few hours I needed to use it. | | Similarly, I have rented apartments in my 20s in places I | had no intention of setting down, and buying would have | been a waste of time and effort. | janef0421 wrote: | I think temporary rentals and indefinite rentals are | fundamentally distinct products, so analysing them | together doesn't make a lot of sense. | ajsnigrutin wrote: | Considering property taxes, do you really ever own your | house? | lotsofpulp wrote: | An indefinite rental sounds like a misnomer better stated | as "being too poor to buy <x>". Or maybe "insufficient | supply of <x>". Which, in this discussion would be land, | in certain locations. | adrianmonk wrote: | It's more or less a nonstarter in tornado-prone areas. | | From https://www.weather.gov/jan/swpw_mhsafety : | | > _Mobile homes are not a safe shelter when tornadoes threaten. | NOAA and FEMA recommend that mobile and manufactured home | residents flee their homes for sturdier shelter before storms | with tornadoes hit. On average, a total of 72 percent of all | tornado-related fatalities are in homes and 54 percent of those | fatalities are in mobile homes._ | | I don't know the percentage of people who live in mobile homes, | but I'm sure it's nowhere close to 54%. | thrown_22 wrote: | On the other hand in fire prone areas I'd want something I can | drive out. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-09-11 23:00 UTC)