[HN Gopher] Why Craigslist still looks the same after 25 years ___________________________________________________________________ Why Craigslist still looks the same after 25 years Author : simonebrunozzi Score : 249 points Date : 2022-09-16 06:29 UTC (16 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.pcmag.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.pcmag.com) | JJMcJ wrote: | Another site that has changed little is the Drudge Report. | | I don't agree with the somewhat right-wing political bias of the | site, but it's clear and easy to use. | MatthewORyan wrote: | There is little if anything that is still "right-wing" about | Drudge today. If you doubt me, load it a few times every week | and see what is featured. It's not the Drudge of 5 or 10 or 15 | years ago. | zasdffaa wrote: | I (here in the UK) did have occasional luck meeting others for | sex in the 'personals' section. Until that was shut down. | | Thanks, American prudes! | hedora wrote: | People used to complain that Craigslist's accessibility support | was abysmal. Has that changed? | | I like the aesthetic of the site, and see no reason why it would | cause havoc with screen readers. However it was a common | complaint in the past. | danjoredd wrote: | Simple answer: its enough. | | Long answer: Its good enough | AlbertCory wrote: | I still use CL, after I try NextDoor (and less often, eBay). | | Many of the scammers are pretty easy to spot: they say "my agent | will pick it up and give you a cashier's check (or money order)." | I think CL could easily make it harder for the scammers, with | minimal effort. | | For the ghosting buyers: this isn't just limited to CL. On the | last item, I was _giving_ something away on NextDoor, and still | had around 8 ghosts. What I finally resorted to was asking for | the exact time they were coming, and making it clear that I was | not holding it for them if they didn 't show up. | | If there were several on the same day, I'd tell the later ones | that someone was (supposedly) coming before them, and it might be | gone so they should double check before coming. | paxys wrote: | I have no problem with Craigslist's interface, but the site is | pretty much Scamlist at this point. | | I often simultaneously list stuff on Craigslist, FB Marketplace | and Nextdoor. The latter two have a near perfect success rate. | Craiglist replies are all the most obvious scams in the world. | | This is becoming more and more the case for apartments as well. | The majority of listings in my area are scams with pictures | stolen from Redfin or elsewhere. Reporting will remove them but | five more will show up the next day. Zillow Rentals, Strerteasy, | Hotpads are a lot more reputable. | | Craigslist needs to take all the money they have saved in design | and put it towards anti spam and fraud detection tools. | aresant wrote: | An aged but still relevant article - "Increase your conversion | rate by making your site ugly" is a good parallel read | particularly with regard to accessibility | | https://www.conversionvoodoo.com/blog/2010/04/increase-your-... | HWR_14 wrote: | I feel like that article misses the biggest differentiator. "Be | early enough that this looked reasonable at the time - win - | rely on network effects to never need to upgrade your site." | badwolf wrote: | I feel like Nilay Patel and the designers at The Verge take | this article as their mantra... | tomtheelder wrote: | I agree totally with the accessibility bit, but overall I think | this article is based on a totally flawed premise. For starters | most sites that gain traction look very good, and they are just | citing the extremely small number of exceptions and acting like | they represent some sort of trend. Second, almost all those | sites gained traction in an era when their designs looked good | or at least fine compared to their contemporaries and then | lived off familiarity and network effects. | malikNF wrote: | Thank you for posting this gem. I really enjoyed it. | | For anyone wondering, there's a previous discussion on this | article on HN[1] | | [1]https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1338459 | BitwiseFool wrote: | My problem with Craigslist isn't that it looks old, the problem | is that they seemingly refuse to modernize anything else about | the site. Craigslist is chock full of spam and people abusing the | search feature. I'm no anti-spam guru, but surely there is a way | to cut down on people submitting the same thumbnail dozens of | times using as many keywords as they can so their cellphone | screen repair service shows up when looking for just about | anything. | | Craig is no saint, and actively goes after any competition to his | site. That, coupled with the complacency or refusal to go after | spammers leaves me with a very sour opinion of the platform and | Craig himself. | Solvitieg wrote: | It's fair to point out that Youtube and Twitter have spam | problems and apparently can't solve it either. I don't think | it's trivial. | sc00ty wrote: | > and actively goes after any competition to his site | | What do you mean by this? Is he acquiring the competition or is | there another way he's going after them? | BitwiseFool wrote: | https://archive.ph/YbZbA | | "Craigslist has sued or issued cease-and-desist letters to | dozens of startups in recent years. A New York Times | technology blog last year complained that the site "has dug | an effective moat by cultivating an exaggerated image of | 'doing good' that keeps its customers loyal, while behind the | scenes, it bullies any rivals that come near and it stifles | innovation." | | The article itself is a little old, but it still holds true. | c4Km7V3D wrote: | Re-read the article, the author does not give a primary | source and cites a different article. The subjects of the | lawsuits (from many years ago) seem to be sites that are | scraping ads/listings on craigslist and mass populating | their own site to make it seem as if they have users OR | they are sites that are aggregating the information on | craigslist and trying to pass themselves off as affiliated | with craigslist by using their trademarks. | | If you've ever searched for an apartment or a car for sale | you'll find that many of the new and popular sites are | literally just posting ads scraped from craigslist. | frankharv wrote: | I love it and I despise the fact that they pulled down personal | ads. | | It was like a virtual clipboard in the laundromat. | | Then the feds came and kicked in the doors. | joegahona wrote: | I thought they pulled their personal ads because people were | getting murdered -- the Phillip Markoff interrogation is a | must-listen for fans of that genre; it's a shame there's only | audio available. According to this QZ article from 2018 | though, it was for human-trafficking reasons. | | > In March, Craigslist pulled its personals section in | response to a sex-trafficking bill that holds platforms | liable if they are found to be facilitating sex trafficking | and prostitution. The reaction was not without merit: over | the years, websites like Craigslist and Backpage had become | online marketplaces for illegal sexual activity. | https://qz.com/1310350/what-we-lost-when-craigslist-shut- | dow... | reaperducer wrote: | _It was like a virtual clipboard in the laundromat._ | | The corkboard is still there. If you start using it again, | others will. Same way CL, FBM, and the others got traction. | RunSet wrote: | I'm on a mission to keep encounters casual. | | https://lokilist.com/about.php | | It's slow going but fortunately text is cheap to host so I | can keep this up indefinitely. | | Edit: If you like it make a post. Even better share the link | to the post. Network effect is real. | CharlesW wrote: | A recent experience trying to find something on Craigslist was | shocking. As much as its UI is frozen in time, so are its anti- | abuse measures. | | I have no doubt that lots of people are getting hurt using | Craigslist. I would never recommend it to friends or family. | defterGoose wrote: | Can you provide a concrete example? | | IME any online platform is going to be a staircase into the | bowels of human nature. It's all about being aware you need | to protect yourself online. If you're encountering things | like child porn or prostitution, or anything illegal really, | it's your responsibility to at least report it. | humanistbot wrote: | Housing is terrible on CL. Bot farms take past listings | from sites like Zillow and apartments.com, cut the rent to | a deal that seems too good to be true, then when you are | interested you get connected to a "missionary traveling | abroad who just wants their place taken care of." They will | even be happy to rent to someone who is not yet in the | area, which is otherwise really hard and expensive to do. | All they need is you to wire a deposit and they'll have a | friend deliver the keys...... | iudqnolq wrote: | An obvious example is zero-dollar listings with a different | dollar amount in the title. | CharlesW wrote: | > _Can you provide a concrete example?_ | | Sure. I spent a few weeks looking for an Xbox Series X, and | I don't believe that I'm exaggerating when I say that 90%+ | of the listings were scams. For about half of those, the | scammers just weren't very good, and automated or semi- | automated checks should've flagged those listings before | anyone saw them. The other half were various scams | documented in thousands of articles by a cottage industry | created in lieu of anti-abuse measures. | | > _IME any online platform is going to be a staircase into | the bowels of human nature._ | | Granted, but some bowels are cleaner than others. | Craigslist clearly does not get enough fiber in its diet. | | > _If you 're encountering things like child porn or | prostitution, or anything illegal really, it's your | responsibility to at least report it._ | | I did, of course, but I got tired of working for Craigslist | for free after a while. | amatecha wrote: | Yeah, for a while I would flag any listing I felt | violated the ToS. but I started to notice that THE SAME | LISTING would come up shortly (if any action was taken on | the initial listing to begin with). I'm not going to | bother wasting my energy trying to flag listings when CL | isn't doing their part to _learn_ and improve their | detection of blatantly-obvious fraud or ToS violations. I | mean I'm talking like blatant keyword spam (which is | against ToS) that's even prefaced by "Keywords:", the | same listing made in every possible nearby jurisdiction, | stuff like that. It's so obvious and and easy to detect. | The worst are car ads. You search for a really specific | model, of a specific year, and somehow you get like 500+ | results. Because every car listing is just a wall of | keyword spam, of completely unrelated makes/models. Cool. | defterGoose wrote: | Cars: just filter by only "cars and trucks" and "owner". | Bingo bango. | snowwrestler wrote: | My experience with Craigslist has been that there are a | lot of keyword-stuffed scam listings in search results, | but they are generally sorted below more useful results, | and generally easy to spot and ignore. | | It makes sense to me as a strategy for leveraging fuzzy | automation. Sorting is less risky than hiding or | deleting. If the system gets it wrong, there is a still | an opportunity for motivated users to dig down and find | incorrectly down-sorted items. | gernb wrote: | I would argue the biggest reason craigslist is doing well it it's | free and semi anonymous (it forwards all emails though generated | addresses) | | The UX has areas clearly neglected. For example in apartments | there is a trashcan icon to hide a listing. But, it's inserted at | the end of the description. If the description is long then the | button does not appear. | | Another is the categories. In SF, SOMA and Mission Bay arguably | need to be separated but craigslist only lists SOMA and groups | Mission Bay in with it. That's one of several areas that need to | be split | | I used it a ton over the last 6 months trying to find an | apartment but in the end I found the apartment on apartments.com | ... which is far from perfect but has some features arguably more | suited to apartment hunting. | | That I think might be the point. Different products can benefit | from unique features | princevegeta89 wrote: | Still works well for the little functionality it has. Having a | great UX and UI is always a good thing but at the same time if it | only means putting a lot of new cognitive load on the user I | would rather not have it. | insane_dreamer wrote: | Craigslist >> NextDoor >> OfferUp >> eBay >> FB | | But definitely YMMV depending on the city you're in. | | I'm glad it's stayed the way it is. Arguably the best marketplace | website, period. Simple to post, simple to use, local pickup | only. Not infested with ad/promoted listings. | PaulBGD_ wrote: | Agreed, although the sad thing is that eBay/FB have a large | audience.. so if I fail to sell something elsewhere I'll | usually have to switch to one of those two :( | insane_dreamer wrote: | I closed by FB account 10 years, not opening it up again even | if it's to access their Marketplace. Was big on eBay back in | the day when bidding was fun (before sniper bots took over), | you could find good deals, and wasn't full of scams. Used it | just this week probably for the first time in 10 years to | find an obscure part that I needed replacing--still good for | that. | sojournerc wrote: | Rock Auto is another such site. Looks old but is so much more | effective than modern sites for finding the right car parts. If | it ain't broke, don't fix it. | brokenodo wrote: | I love Rock Auto. The way they make it easy to see which | warehouse your items are shipping from and choose other items | from the same warehouse is super cool too. | amatecha wrote: | Just ordered something from them earlier this week. They got | my repeat business because the last time I ordered something | from them it was effortless (other than their kinda poor UI | lol) and the item arrived super fast. I guess the shipping | was a bit pricy, but that's fine. They had the part and got | it to me promptly, and charged a fair price for it. Works for | me! | ugh123 wrote: | CL wins on a lot of fronts but they need to do something about | the spam and for-sale bloat submitted by stores. | yboris wrote: | Craigslist might work well in large metro area like SF, but when | your state is carved up into numerous non-overlapping regions and | you're 60 minutes away from the center of either one to your side | - it's just a sad roulette to see if you have to drive an hour to | pick something up. With a simple distance-from-zipcode search | implementation Craigslist could still be useful. | | Sadly I'm stuck with Facebook Marketplace for now (which has been | amazing for distance searches). | s0rce wrote: | Its also annoying when its the opposite, if I want to search | for a car in California, I just stick myself centrally in | Frenso and click all the adjacent areas since you can get SF, | Sac, LA, Vegas. | mindprism wrote: | Extreeeeeemely careful regression testing. | JohnFen wrote: | I'm glad Cragislist hasn't changed. It's pretty much ideal as it | is. | creeble wrote: | It's odd that this article came out only a few months after CL | did a semi-significant change in the way they display listings -- | the "gallery view" now lays out the screen differently, and it's | fairly broken on mobile, pushing the left menu in and out | randomly as you scroll (iOS Firefox and Safari anyway). | | FWIW, I still use CL quite a lot in the SF Bay area. The cars | listings are full of spam and scams, probably double what they | were 5 or 6 years ago. This, despite the fact that they started | charging for cars/trucks listings. | system16 wrote: | I don't particularly like Craigslist's UI, but I still prefer it | to other online marketplaces because it's fast and simple. I do | find it cluttered and not very nice to navigate, but I'll gladly | take a bit of clutter and clunkiness over MBs of hideous banner | ads shoved in my face, and god-knows what trackers and scripts | are being used on the other sites. | | Similarly, I still use old.reddit and will continue to do so | until they force that new monstrosity on me. | defterGoose wrote: | See, I completely equate "clutter" with things like banner ads. | CL is amongst the least "cluttered" sites I use. | | It absolutely doesn't live up to the latest trends in UI/UX | design, but the fact that it feels more like basic HTML forms | with little styling is a feature, not a bug. | tomtheelder wrote: | > It absolutely doesn't live up to the latest trends in UI/UX | design | | I'd have to disagree pretty strongly here. It is- excluding | the homepage- a paragon of modern UX design, and I think many | other sites have taken a lot of inspiration. Search oriented, | minimalist design elements that stay out of the way of the | user, key filters to narrow search, saved searches, alerts, | etc. It's even almost entirely flat aesthetically! You could | do a completely surface level reskin of Craigslist and it | would appear, from a UX/UI perspective, to be a totally | modern interface. I think people see the older visual | aesthetic and assume that it's not in line with modern UX | best practices, but it largely is! Again home page is | excluded here. I think that's still the way it is for | familiarity/nostalgia reasons, because they have made tons of | changes to the main search UI but left the home page | basically untouched. | | The trends that it doesn't keep up with are mostly | technological rather than UX/UI. | seydor wrote: | I dont think craigslist has a nice look. It's just stuck because | it was the first in the world. I don't mean he needs to make it | look like another cookiecutter bootstrap rounded-edges website, | but he can reorganize to make it be more functional | onemoresoop wrote: | Craigslist works fine, I'm okay with the older UI. Yes, there are | scammers but there are scammers on FB marketplace as well. Now | it's lost it's users to FB but it's possible it may see a | resurgence after a bad move by FB or some trend change. | layer8 wrote: | > Because that serves people better. I've learned that people | want stuff that is simple and fast and gets the job done. People | don't need fancy stuff. Sometimes you just want to get through | the day. [...] It's fast and easy for people, and that's a big | deal. [...] For me as an engineer, simple is beautiful. | Functional is beautiful. | amatecha wrote: | I still use CL frequently. I actually have a few search terms I | literally search every day. I have got SO MANY amazing deals | because of this. Yeah, you have to be patient, but stuff does | come up. I have both bought and sold over CL and never once been | scammed, but then again I do my due diligence and trust my gut. | Anyway, one of the best things about it is that it has stayed the | same and you know what to expect. No insane UI overhaul that | makes it all "latest trend", no scummy user-exploitation dark | patterns (that I've noticed), no animated video ads covering 1/3 | of the screen... Yeah, it has some flaws, but for me it's still | the optimal "local buy/sell" service. | [deleted] | hammock wrote: | No better outlet to write this story than "PC Magazine." | scyzoryk_xyz wrote: | When I lived in the US, at a certain point I realized literally | every major aspect of my life in some way could be worked back to | a craigslist ad - cars, places to live in and jobs. | | We don't have craigslist where I live in Europe, and I miss it. | Instead it's an endless parade of for-profit services like olx. | | I tell people about craigslist and it's alien to them, this idea | that something on the internet could be managed to be run by a | dozen people and not be changed. | | It's not even the simplicity that is so appealing to me, but that | you get this feeling that it is a totally neutral platform. Like | air, you don't see it but it's there. And nobody is trying to put | perfume in it. | kazinator wrote: | Craigslist superficially looks the same if you don't care about | the removal of RSS. | egberts1 wrote: | And none of those ad-filled crapola too! | | Craigslist. Short and simple. | | Find all my spare parts to most anything there | Ken_At_EM wrote: | It's because it prints money. Is just a straight money printing | machine. Of all the Golden Goose's, it's best to just leave it | alone and let it do it's thing. | nonethewiser wrote: | Article says it has "10s" of employees. They are just | maintaining the money printer. | laundermaf wrote: | Facebook prints money too but that didn't stop them from | turning the clean perfect interface they had in 2010 into the | steaming pile of eggs it is now. | Ken_At_EM wrote: | I mean, yeah, that was a huge mistake. They should have left | it alone entirely, they would have had so much more money to | build the Meta-verse with! | wildzzz wrote: | It's because Facebook has to constantly "innovate" to raise | the share price. I'm sure Craigslist makes some decent income | for it's owners and can pay it's bills every month but it's | never going to explode in growth. They don't need new | investors constantly because they don't do anything new. | Their whole site is basically LAMP except for Perl instead of | PHP. The latest part of their tech stack is a mail server | that's 10 years old. | Andrew_nenakhov wrote: | I think this is intentional. The more you scroll their ugly | interface to find what you are looking for, the more ads you | see. | z9znz wrote: | I gave up on CL years ago when the apartment rental lists for | Amsteram became overrun with obvious scams. I would flag them, | but it never seemed to matter. | | Then also because of the Backpage disaster they stopped all the | person to person (dating or hookup) groups. It's a shame too, | because I actually met some good people in the past on those | groups. | | So on one hand, they over-moderated by eliminating whole segments | of their site while apparently ignoring other segments which | became rife with garbage ads or outright scams. And once the real | audience finds wading through garbage to be too much effort, we | leave and the site becomes irrelevant. | ihsoj wrote: | We need more sites like HN and Craigslist. primarily text based | but fully functional. And most importantly no ads. | jerrybender wrote: | HN has ads | 1970-01-01 wrote: | A: Because that serves people better. I've | learned that people want stuff that is simple and fast and gets | the job done. People don't need fancy stuff. Sometimes you just | want to get through the day. | | That mindset is worth more than anything else Web 3.0 can throw- | up. (pun intended) | [deleted] | bilsbie wrote: | There's nothing wrong with how it looks. They just needed to fix | the scams and let people set up alerts. | alberth wrote: | Why hasn't HN design changed in last 15 years ... because it | works. | Waterluvian wrote: | Craigslist is proof that you do not need to occasionally "refresh | the look and feel" of your website or app. | | I have a real chip on my shoulder for the occasional design team | that seems intent on justifying their own existence and nothing | more. | | I'd love to learn about big user studies that concluded with, | "don't change a thing. It's good as is." Surely that case must be | appropriate some % of the time. But I think when you've got a | hammer you just see nails and work for you. | bluedino wrote: | Craigslist is basically dead in my area. | inanutshellus wrote: | I hate FB Marketplace. | | It's actively hostile to buyers. | | Like, try to find a "kinda nice" bicycle. You can't find the | bicycle category (though it does exist as a sub-group of Sporting | Goods), you can't just say "show me bikes" unless you hack the | URL, you _can_ search for the word "bicycle" but for some reason | people selling a "Specialized Rockhopper" think you know it's a | bicycle so don't use that word. | | Oh, and when selling, they just suggest random categories instead | of letting you choose from their heirarchy. So you get bicycles | in Hobbies. You get them in Sporting Goods. You get them in | Bicycles. But... You can't search for them by type. | | That's not even complaining about the lack of attributes, like | "type=BMX" or "type=Mountain" or "Size=Large" or "Frame | Material=Carbon Fiber"... all of which are in Craigslist and | eBay. | | And! when searching, they actively work to inject ebay-like | selling (non-local) into the mix by resetting my distance | preferences every time I change the search. "Find bicycles" -> | "Find bicycles in 30 miles" -> "Find 'Specialized Rockhopper'" -> | Why am I getting "Ships To You" results?! Why am I getting non- | bicycle results?! Oh. They reset my distance again. | | ^-- BTW they do this because they actually make money when the | sale happens through FB. If you just buy it in-person with cash | they don't get a cut. Misaligned incentives, as they say. | | And! even if I do find the bicycle category, if narrow the | category by searching with a word in there, like "Rockhopper" it | takes me out of the bicycle category to do the search! | | G. A. R. B. A. G. E. | adolph wrote: | Dammit Jim, I'm a cyclist, not an ontologist! | | [edit to correct snowclone] | legitster wrote: | It's been so frustrating to use FB Marketplace. It was | surprisingly awesome for the first year. But they just couldn't | help themselves. | latchkey wrote: | Is this still available? | elcritch wrote: | It surprises me how much companies fail at the basics of online | shopping.. FB market is a garbage fire. They're more interested | in selling ads than making a market place. | | For new stuff Amazon is huge and cluttered yet still manages to | run circles around almost every other online store for similar | reasons to what you listed. The only exception I've found is BH | Photo and Video. But all the others like Walmart/Jet, Home | Depot, Newegg (now) etc all just "don't get it". | | Craig's list really nails the simplicity and usefulness of | online used markets. It still amazes me. | 762236 wrote: | Isn't Home Depot licensing Amazon's store logic? I don't | remember why I have that impression, as I haven't been to | Home Depot in ages, but for some reason it made me feel that | Amazon was running their store. | shabbatt wrote: | Sellers too. Not to mention harassment/racism/phobia when the | price isnt "right". | | Facebook usage seems to be correlated with reduced cognition, | it invites the bottom rung of society | alanwreath wrote: | I used to blame eBay for the lack of updates to Craigslist - but | it seems that Craigslist is now back in the hands of the original | creator...so the reason is probably that he's got his and is | doing something else while it runs on fumes. | rosywoozlechan wrote: | I rent a couple of properties out in the bay area and up until | this year I've always relied on craigslist to get new tenants, | but this year we tried out Zillow and we got tons of applicants, | and the whole application process including vetting and setting | up a lease and everything was done through Zillow. On the other | hand someone noticed our Zillow listing and created a fraudulent | listing of my property on Craigslist. I'm pretty much never going | back to Craigslist. Apartments.com is also good for creating | leases and managing properties, but Zillow seems to be the place | to get high quality tenants. | exhilaration wrote: | Did Zillow charge for this service? You mentioned "vetting" - | does that include background and credit checks? | rosywoozlechan wrote: | Yes, I think the prospective applicants pay for the | background checks and then they are submitted for all the | places they apply on Zillow. We can pay for them also. It | includes a criminal check and a credit score check. | jeffbee wrote: | As far as I have been able to determine, literally 100% of the | rental listings in Berkeley, CA on Craigslist are fake. They | take MLS descriptions and photos of properties and repost those | on CL as rentals with unrealistically low prices. The postings | are identity theft scams. They want you to "apply" to rent | these properties that don't exist. | | The real problem for me is that the elected officials and even | sometimes professional staff of the city will point to | Craigslist as inventory of low-priced housing, but it's totally | fake so their impression is inaccurate. | tomcam wrote: | Thanks for sharing. I'm about to rent out a house so this helps | a lot. | | One thing I don't get is why someone else would copy your | listing? Do they somehow get a slice of the pie if a respondent | rents? | jstarfish wrote: | > One thing I don't get is why someone else would copy your | listing? Do they somehow get a slice of the pie if a | respondent rents? | | Usually this is a scam. You advertise someone else's vacant | property, break in to conduct tenant tours, collect | fees/deposits/first month's rent, then bail. | [deleted] | tomcam wrote: | Well that's just evil. I never gave that possibility a | thought. | jstarfish wrote: | I tried to find a succinct name for this scheme but | failed. I did find a blog where a retired attorney | discusses this and some variations on it (and learned | something new in the process: pulling this stunt on | _multiple_ prospective tenants at the same time makes | this a hell of a lot more lucrative): | | https://livingstingy.blogspot.com/2017/07/house-rental- | scams... | tomcam wrote: | Excellent article, thank you. And you're right, this scam | needs a name. | O__________O wrote: | Basically financial identity theft and fraud combined | with breaking and entering -- there's no need to makeup | new names for simple combinations of crimes. | | Long list for crimes people commit using Craigslist. | Another similar one is for an attacker to post saying | your moving of the country, out of town, already removed | everything you're not taking, but asked neighbor to leave | the door open and anything in house is free to take; then | they simply know when you're away, pick the lock, leave | the door open, and post the listing. Unknowing strangers | rob you OR have a plausible explanation of why they are | robbing you. | jstarfish wrote: | Interesting. Haven't seen that one, but it's reminiscent | of the "revenge" personals where you solicit randos to | randomly drop in on your [ex] to fulfill their supposed | rape fantasy. | | > no need to makeup new names for simple combinations of | crimes | | Fraud schemes are sophisticated and the better ones are | not easily understood (by victims, investigators and | jurors alike). It may be unnecessary/unconventional but I | find it useful to reduce the complexity of schemes to a | buzzword with a common meaning that anybody can reference | without ambiguity. Gets it into the popular vernacular-- | everybody knows to be wary of "catfishing" without having | to explain it. | | From the crimes they comprise to their implementation, | it's function definitions all the way down: a concise, | reusable reference that avoids repeat articulation of a | more-complex set of behaviors :) | code_duck wrote: | Most of the similar scams I've seen don't involve entering | and showing the property, or being even anywhere near it. A | common style is to post a duplicated listing on Craigslist | (it may be a house currently on the market, but often is an | inactive listing on Zillow - they just need an address and | matching photos) with a story written in a style that would | be familiar to scam aficionados. The owner is a god-fearing | good person who just wants their house to be safe while | they are overseas on missionary work or in the military, | and they're willing to rent it to the right people for a | generous below market rate. Kindly do this-or-that, god | bless you, etc. They request a sum of money, making it | enticing by naming a rate 3/4 of what would be going rent | for the property, and say they'll mail the key. | nostromo wrote: | It's also common for them to say that this apartment has | "just been rented," and then show them a completely | different apartment for their clients. Usually these | apartments are both worse and more expensive. | tbihl wrote: | I don't think we ever had break ins, but in our small house | near the beach in San Diego, my wife and I regularly had to | break it to people that they were not moving in next | morning/weekend/week/month, and that they had been scammed. | Don't know how much they were paying in. | orsenthil wrote: | I had a need for AC repair, and 3 CL service men let me down. | Nextdoor of all places seem to have landed me with right service | man in my locality. | aeharding wrote: | Craigslist has an awesome UI. But I really wish they'd switch out | their clunky JS-based gallery component for pure CSS scroll | snapping! | anarticle wrote: | I would say because it is a tool, and tools should stay | relatively the same. It's ok to make a new tool! | | I have this discussion with people who make physical objects all | the time, and their frustrations with the software world. Imagine | learning to use a Heidelberg offset press 20y ago, and if you | enter your workshop, it performs the same as before. Now imagine | you are a painter who uses photoshop elements once in awhile. For | some reason, your printer is printing all your pictures with a | red tinge. You buy a new version of photoshop elements, and the | problem is gone. The moving targets of saas and other remote | updated software changes the perspective on tools, especially for | production purposes. Many people who produce physical objects | with software run into these problems. I fix up motorcycles in my | spare time, and I dread the day my torque wrench needs an update! | hedora wrote: | My aging German automobile's radio failed to display an o that | a cloud service sent it yesterday. I really wonder how that | regression slipped through. It has been able to display German | in the past, along with all sorts of other unicode characters. | | The only thing I can figure is the band that named the song is | Mongolian, so maybe they used a U-1803 (Mongolian full stop . ) | as a modifier on the o? | | But then why did my phone display it correctly? | ravenstine wrote: | People use (or at least _used_ ) Craigslist because they like it | when websites and apps actually work. I never encountered bugs or | bizarre UI problems when using Craigslist. It turns out the only | people who care about flashy animations, fancy drop shadows, | "native" looking UI elements, Material/Human design principles, | etc., are developers and designers. Normal people only care about | those things when functionality is solved first. If it functions | like crap, but it _looks_ good, you 're just putting lipstick on | a pig, and lipstick might not have even been called for in the | first place. | ddejohn wrote: | Not disagreeing at all. I get irrationally angry when a website | shits the bed because of flashy UI BS. | | One thing I will say is that I personally appreciate "modern" | UIs (when they work) because I have ADHD and the visual clutter | of "old fashioned" websites is a serious problem for me. I have | old reddit set to 200% magnification just to keep the amount of | content on the screen to a minimum, and to minimize the width | of lines of text. | | Again though, I do still prefer snappy and functional over | 'elegant' and sluggish, even if it's more difficult for me to | focus. | ravenstine wrote: | I also have ADHD and have an adoration for old-style website | design. Not necessarily the 2008 - 2013 era (which I like to | call the 1970's of the web), but websites before that which | were more cluttered and unrefined. | | Websites from the old days surface far more relevant | information on the first fold than do contemporary sites, | which I believe have gone overboard with Swiss Style design | inspiration such that they think empty space is always | preferable. The fact that many websites today use extremely | large fonts in order to pass accessibility tests also doesn't | help, but this is partly subjective because I personally hate | reading text greater than 16px. | | Maybe I would think differently if I did lots of heavy | reading, but that's hard to do these days because most prose | on the internet is filler and total rubbish. If I want to | just find something, a website being designed like a magazine | cover really doesn't help. | | Allow me to illustrate my perspective. | | This website, which has been online since 1994, would today | be considered one of the most poorly designed sites of all | time. | | http://amasci.com/ | | Bask in the dark repeating background, the neon colors, and | the quirky use of font size. | | And yet, unlike 95% of sites online today, it loads | instantly, and is organized such that I can find what I might | be looking for without distraction. The author provides a | header guiding new users to categories, and underneath is a | list of links to pages the author thinks I might be | interested in. And that's it. No Fontawesome, no TypeKit, no | box shadows, no hover animations, no hover dropdowns, no | sticky headers, no scroll jacking, no transparencies, no | accordions, no hamburger menus, no bullshit. | | A "modern" website would make the first fold into a glorified | billboard, hide anything interesting in horizontal navigation | of categories that have to be expanded out, use 19px font for | prose because The Google, a masonry type layout because CSS | grid bro, a sticky header that annoyingly animates in/out, | and one to three popup modals asking me to give them my | email. | sigmonsays wrote: | in light of "Updating the UI to be modern just because", my 4yr | old says "because" is not a reason. Even she knows, yet so many | choose to have a modern look for no gain (likely the opposite). | | I'm happy he left the UI the same | moolcool wrote: | Craigslist is one of my favorite tech companies. They have a | fantastic product which they don't sabotage in the interest of | growth. Huge respect to them for quietly being the best. | LegitShady wrote: | I don't think craigslist is a tech company. | BitwiseFool wrote: | I feel like there is a risk of sabotage through complacency and | a refusal to adapt to competition. People looking for rentals | and homes to buy don't go to craigslist first, they do to sites | like Zillow and Redfin. As I've mentioned in a different | response, the spam and junk listings are a persistent problem | and none of the spam seems particularly sophisticated or hard | to stop - most are literally the same image and content with a | ton of tags posted under different categories. | JohnFen wrote: | To be honest, I've never even thought about going to | Craigslist for rentals in the decades I've been using it. | | But I use it a lot for other things. | scelerat wrote: | Craigslist to me, beyond something I still use regularly to hunt | for musical instruments, electronics, bikes, furniture, garage | sales, etc, is an enduring shibboleth when it comes to "design." | | When someone says "Craigslist design sucks," I can probably guess | how that person thinks about design and what it means to them. | | IMO Craigslist has survived as long as it has, in spite of no | promotion, no advertising, no partner deals, no api integrations, | yadda yadda, precisely because it is designed very well for its | purpose and its users. I would never claim that CL is the most | _aesthetically pleasing_ site to look at, but when it comes to | posting, searching and browsing classified ads (and even | participating in its message boards), it does the job quite well | and with minimum hassle. | | For the first three weeks after I moved to San Francisco, more | than sixteen years ago, I couch surfed at my boss's place on | Stanyan street in Cole Valley. At the time, Craig also lived | nearby. My boss and he were friends and would frequently meet at | a coffee shop, and I would often join them. When I was first | introduced to Craig, I quipped that I had recently moved, and did | he know a good place to search for apartments? He gave me a | gentle smirk and a merely mildly condescending roll of the eyes. | Very pleasant, intelligent, and unassuming person. | jlukic wrote: | Nice vignette, thanks for sharing this. | JohnFen wrote: | Agreed. | | > I would never claim that CL is the most aesthetically | pleasing site to look at | | Which, I think, is a good thing. Experience has taught me that | if a web site obviously put a lot of effort into being | aesthetically appealing, it's probably not a great website. | wly_cdgr wrote: | Cos it ain't broke and the people running it are a very rare | breed who know better than to fix it. Same with McMaster Carr | website and a very few others | DesiLurker wrote: | I wish more sites maintained that sort of minimalism and stayed | away from selling out as much as possible. Great job CL! | jethro_tell wrote: | Man, just 10 people working there, couldn't have done that with | vc backed funding. Have to grow, then have to add people to | grow, then have to add features to try to pay for the people. | | But man, if you think about every $25 car/apartment/job post, | it's plenty of money for 10 people. Pretty insane. | ghaff wrote: | >plenty of money for 10 people | | I'm guessing a lot of people here wouldn't consider it plenty | of money. | xapata wrote: | Craig Newmark has roughly $1B. | ghaff wrote: | I doubt if he's typical of people working at Craigslist. | thfuran wrote: | A billion split ten ways is still a decent chunk of | pocket change. Clearly there's money in Craigslist, | regardless of how it has been apportioned. | adolph wrote: | has != earns | | Makes me wonder: if people were offered a lump sum up | front which represented their lifetime take-home pay + | fringe for the job they will do for the rest of their | life, what would people's number be? | | Or another way, a choice of a 10 year contract to do X | worth 100k/annual take-home with 1m delivered at start, | or an unchanging biweekly paycheck. Would the biweekly | need to be higher to make it more attractive than the | one-time payment or could it be lower yet still be the | favored choice. | JohnFen wrote: | > if people were offered a lump sum up front which | represented their lifetime take-home pay + fringe for the | job they will do for the rest of their life, what would | people's number be? | | You literally couldn't pay me enough to be locked into | the same job for the rest of my life. | | I also wouldn't want to be locked into a 10 year | contract. | thfuran wrote: | >has != earns | | Yes, and? | | >a choice of a 10 year contract to do X worth 100k/annual | take-home with 1m delivered at start, or an unchanging | biweekly paycheck. Would the biweekly need to be higher | to make it more attractive than the one-time payment or | could it be lower yet still be the favored choice. | | You can only make the up front payment so large before | employees start quitting early and moving to Montenegro. | adolph wrote: | >>> Craig Newmark has roughly $1B. | | >> I doubt if he's typical of people working at | Craigslist. | | > A billion split ten ways is still a decent chunk of | pocket change. | | The difference being that Newmark has an equity stake of | some hypothetical value and the people working there | would receive some fixed value per unit of time. If | Newmark were to pay each of 10 workers $1B/10 then: | * their paychecks afterward would be much smaller | * their next tax period would be much larger * | someone else would control Craigslist since the equity | stake would have been liquidated (probably causing it to | be worth less than $1B) | | Thus `has != earns` | | > quitting early and moving to Montenegro | | I'm of the thought that there is only so much leisure a | person can take before there is a drive to contribute | toward the betterment of humanity. If someone trusted you | and you were trustable, would you take a large lump sum | and work for work's sake? Would it make a difference if | the sum was an equity stake in the work's environment? | | https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/1501096-let-s-suppose- | that-... | neonscribe wrote: | He said "in the 10s", so I guess it could be up to a couple | hundred. Still, a remarkably small number for a business like | that. | layer8 wrote: | I think "in the 10s" means less than a hundred. Probably | not close to a hundred as well in this instance. | nonethewiser wrote: | I remember watching a Harvard System Design intro lecture by | David Milan on YouTube. He was talking about tradeoffs and said | that craigslist stored all their listings as static html. which | was extremely cheap and performant but made it harder to edit and | stuff like that. | | I wonder if they have changed since then. | FearlessNebula wrote: | I recalled the same, and was hoping to read some more | information about that in the article. | strangattractor wrote: | Because it works? | NikolaNovak wrote: | * I far, far, far prefer Craigslist interface to anything else in | that space. It's clear and focused | | Its search engine too - I get things I search for in the area I | search for. | | For me, Kijiji and Facebook marketplace are awful UI, awful | distractions, and give me 10,000 "suggested" or "fuzzy searched" | things in random order, suppressing things I'm actually looking | for. And I've _completely_ given up on eBay over last decade. | | However. | | * Nothing is on Craigslist anymore in my area (Greater Toronto | Area). Until about... 5-6 years ago, I could find comparable | number of photography, computer, music & kids stuff on Craigslist | and Kijiji. Today, Craigslist is a desert, a void, an oasis of | empty search results. | | So network effect wins, as always :-/ | rcpt wrote: | Used to feel this way but I really like OfferUps built in chat. | With Craigslist you end up with people who expect phone calls | or emails or texts and it's never clear which is which | cyanydeez wrote: | Network effects+ Astroturf | spaniard89277 wrote: | In Spain all old craiglist equivalents are mostly gone or full | of spam. We've got Wallapop though, and it's fine. It feels | modern, not too clunky, and IMO it's a right balance. | | Until someone decides it needs to be more flashy. | xahrepap wrote: | A local media company runs a "classifieds" on their online | site. It dominates locally. Craigslist has been worthless for | ages here because of it. | | However, Facebook Marketplace seems to be slowly gaining | traction. Which I hate for all the reasons you mention. I dread | the day it takes over :( | nerdponx wrote: | Facebook Marketplace has completely taken over in most parts | of the US. It sucks. | neilv wrote: | Any idea about Boston? Boston Craigslist has seemed a bit | stale, but I'm not on Facebook to see how that compares. | don-code wrote: | I've found it pretty rare to _not_ find something I'm | looking for on Boston Craigslist. As something of an "out | there" example, I found ten old tube TVs for my Halloween | decorations just a few weeks ago. Also: I got an | absolutely great deal on a car through Craigslist about | five years ago. | | That said, I've definitely had less success on the sales | side than I did in years prior, but I can't tell if | that's what I'm selling being worth less used these days | (desktop computers?), or if Facebook Marketplace is the | de-facto place to check. | meragrin_ wrote: | Are the TVs going to be a functional part of the display | or just decorative? | don-code wrote: | Functional - I'm leaning into the "analog horror" genre | with some fake newsreels of things like the COVID-23 | pandemic, $6 per gallon gasoline, and (of course - I live | in Boston) the Red Sox losing the World Series to the | Yankees. | nerdponx wrote: | Boston CL is indeed very stale, FB is way more active. | Young people (< 35) seem to have mostly forgotten about | CL or don't care about it. | | Boston has a lot of good stuff in _some_ areas. Need | random leftover shelves? A pile of screened loam? | Secondhand office furniture? An unused China set from the | 1960s? No problem. But good luck trying to buy and sell | normal home goods with any efficiency there; it will | clear much much faster on FB marketplace. Maybe even for | a better price. | colanderman wrote: | Photography and Musical Instruments, it still seems | pretty active. Though FB Marketplace is unfortunately | making inroads the past couple years. | behnamoh wrote: | Yeah, unfortunately the main reason I'm stuck on FB is its | Marketplace in my area. | defterGoose wrote: | As I noted above, not as much of a problem here in LA, but | I totally believe you that it's true elsewhere. And | honestly, I'm probably missing some great stuff not | perusing FB and OfferUp. | | But there's one simple, guiding principle that I'm always | following. And that's refusing to reactivate my FB account. | mikestew wrote: | Much like 25 years ago when I said to myself, "there's | nothing on the internet that I need to see so badly that | I'll install RealNetworks", I'll put stuff on the curb | with a "free" sign before I'll reactivate my long- | deactivated FB account (or buy new, depending on the | direction of the transaction). | atlasunshrugged wrote: | I was right there too but all the rental apartments are | via FB marketplace now to the point I literally could not | find a place without getting back on it (DC). Absolutely | pain, I miss craigslist | njarboe wrote: | Same here in the Roaring Fork Valley. Two months of | Craigslist, apartments.com, bulletin boards, etc. Finally | I posted a "Place Wanted" on some local Facebook groups | and I got something pretty quick. Tons of scammers on | Craigslist here. | JohnFen wrote: | DC doesn't have property management places you can | contact directly? The ones around here are happy to help | you find units for rent. | ghaff wrote: | Honestly, especially for bulky stuff, I've had great luck | leaving things at the end of my driveway with a free | sign. I wouldn't get much money for them and they're out | of my house with almost zero effort. | bombcar wrote: | And if it doesn't move with "free" put a $5 sign on it | and it'll be gone in the morning. | hedora wrote: | In fairness, the only valid complaint I've heard about | Craigslist is that it diverted classified ad revenue away | from reporters, destroying local newspapers, and then local | elections. | | With Craigslist, this always felt like an unintended | consequence. With facebook, it seems like one of their top | ten strategies for getting us to devolve into mineshaft | dwelling mole people that live in the metaverse. | throwaway0x7E6 wrote: | >elections | | what? | reaperducer wrote: | "Democracy dies in darkness." | | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_Dies_in_Darknes | s | | It's sixth-grade Civics class: Without strong local and | national press to hold politicians and public figures | accountable, the country crumbles. | scarface74 wrote: | The local newspapers were horrible about keeping anyone | involved in the justice system accountable. They always | took the words of the police and it wasn't until everyone | had a camera that police mistreatment of minorities | became exposed. | | On the other hand, national newspapers completely ignored | the needs and concerns of "rural White America" and | that's why they were caught flat footed and couldn't | understand the rise of Trump. | | The press has never been concerned about anyone outside | of Middle class White America it needed to die or evolve. | chiefalchemist wrote: | The Fourth Estate is probably a better place to start. | | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Estate | | Sadly, it seems even the Fourth Estate doesn't know its | name and/or role. Being a parrot and/or sock puppet | doesn't qualify (as journalism). | egberts1 wrote: | Just so you know, fourth estate was originally by | lawyers, and not printers. | chiefalchemist wrote: | Originally? Good to know. Thanks. But also not relevant | in the context of the now. | | "The term Fourth Estate or fourth power refers to the | press and news media both in explicit capacity of | advocacy and implicit ability to frame political | issues.[1]" | | My point is, we have "journalists" whining about "the | democracy" and those same "journalists" aren't aware how | badly their profession has already failed said | institution / ideal. | | Imagine pulling up to a fire. Tossing on buckets of | flammable liquids. And then with a straight face claim to | be a firefighter. It's Orwellian. The lack of self- | awareness is not only embarrassing, but it's become down | right dangerous. | lotsofpulp wrote: | Blaming technology for obviating business models is not a | valid complaint. | | In this case, I would say the participants of the local | society are responsible for paying for journalism and | working to support local elections. But even then, you | could come up with arguments such as so and so population | was too poor and had to work two jobs and did not have time | to attend city/county/state meetings, or were not | sufficiently educated or literate to understand them, etc. | lkrubner wrote: | You write "Blaming technology" in response to a comment | that does not mention any technologies. You might want to | examine what your preconceptions are, that you would see | "technology" in a comment that does not refer to | technology. You were responding to a comment that | describes two business strategies, perhaps you should | respond to that. | throwaway743 wrote: | They're either assuming printed local classifieds were | overtaken by a website, or that CL is a site that | performed better than the local classifieds website. | | Not hard to extract, nor worth getting heated about. | lotsofpulp wrote: | I wrote technology on purpose, to cut through useless | information. It is not relevant that "Craigslist" | obviated classified ads. The root problem newspapers were | solving was a seller being able to provide information to | a wide audience of buyers. Technology brought about a | better way of solving this problem, so the root problem | newspapers were getting paid to solve with classifieds no | longer exists. | | Not having local newspapers/journalism causing problems | with the local civic process is a separate problem, that | has nothing to do with technology enabling sellers and | buyers to reach each other more easily. | hn_throwaway_99 wrote: | I'm curious where you live. After all, craigslist famously | decimated classified advertising in the US, primarily because | classified ads in newspapers are hella expensive, and | craigslist is usually free. | mrkstu wrote: | Probably KSL Classifieds in the Utah market: | | https://classifieds.ksl.com/ | xahrepap wrote: | Yup. :) | [deleted] | martyvis wrote: | Interesting. In the late 1960s in Australia a classifieds- | only paper called the Trading Post grew and absolutely | dominated this space by the 1990s. My Dad would buy it | every week to look for bargain junk, cars, etc. I'm sure | the main newspapers took a hit because of it. They had | local versions for each region. It was eventually bought in | 2004 by Sensis (they were part of the main telco Telstra) | for $636M which also owned the Yellow Pages with the intent | of going online. It totally bombed and is surplanted here | by Gumtree (now owned by eBay) and FB marketplace. | https://www.theage.com.au/business/sensis-confident-of- | onlin... | JJMcJ wrote: | CL isn't as useful as it once was, but the interface is still | very straightforward. | | Compare e.g. | https://sfbay.craigslist.org/search/sof#search=1~list~0~100 for | Bay Area software jobs, compared to something like Dice. | | Once again, NOT the quality of the jobs listed, just the ease | of scanning for something of interest. | mytdi wrote: | To me it seems like CL never cought on outside of the bigger | cities in Canada, but Kijiji became very popular. But I agree, | Kijiji is not as clean with the results as CL, and yes, | Facebook Market Place is a mess. Varage Sale is a small player | in certain regions of Canada. | SN76477 wrote: | _Did you find the results you were looking for? | | *Would you like to see results for Books, Used, Sorted by | publisher instead? | | *Often purchased together with ___ + ___ + ____ | TheRealPomax wrote: | Although unfortunately, it doesn't understand the fairly | typical non-urban "yes, you found something that's less than 10 | miles from me as the crow flies, but is about 80 miles away if | I need to actually drive there because of the fact that my car | can't cross a river/strait/lake on its own". Even after 25 | years, that part can _still_ do with improvement. | rightbyte wrote: | Careful what you whish for. That sounds exactly as one of | those fuzzy algorithms that will hide posts randomly due to | stupid reasons. Eg. some address has a glitched road and | Google Maps believes it is only reachable by boat or | helicopter. | TheRealPomax wrote: | This is craigslist, not facebook: don't over-engineer what | you don't need to over-engineer. You just look at already- | made datasets that give the real world distance between two | places, and remove search results based on that. | | Never, ever, use google maps for this, and definitely don't | use it "per query, as needed". The overwhelming majority of | infrastructure doesn't change on even a yearly basis: use | someone else's precompiled dataset, and update whenever | they push an update. | bolasanibk wrote: | >already-made datasets that give the real world distance | between two places | | Can you point me to a source? Thanks. | TheRealPomax wrote: | I got you fam: https://www.google.com/search?q=US+distanc | e+between+cities+d... | | (aka if you actually need this for your project, you | already know how to search for the things you need. If | Craigslist needs one-time access to a GIS system to build | an initial dataset for high volume countries, they can | easily afford the limited time access and dev time to | generate the dataset they need, as well as afford the dev | time required to do a deep dive into which -free or paid- | datasets already exists and are suitable, or not, for | this purpose, as well as what licenses they come with) | hedora wrote: | Isn't this what the map view is for? | sleepybrett wrote: | They wouldn't have to update the interface to do that, but | they could give you 'crow-flies' and 'driving' distances for | sure. | jaredhallen wrote: | Well since Facebook seems to update the user interface | about every 15 seconds anyway, that shouldn't be a major | roadblock. I swear if I'm on marketplace and I take a sip | of coffee, the UX has changed somehow. Seems like they just | have a pool of different interface designs and they just | serve them up at random. | TheRealPomax wrote: | Not really: the search parameter is "km/miles from | location", not "within a radius of..." (the circle is just | a visual estimate). The distance in km/miles from A to B is | not as the crow flies, it's the number found in any of | quite a lot of datasets that gives you all the real world | distances between two places so you can do proper distance | filtering. | tempestn wrote: | FBM also has some glaring deficiencies in its search. For | example, you can't do a keyword search within a category. So | they have a bunch of categories like Vehicles or Electronics, | but within those you can only use predefined filters. If you | want freeform keywords you're stuck with the general search. | AussieWog93 wrote: | I really, _really_ like Facebook Marketplace 's fuzzy | searching. | | Random people listing stuff on local classified sites don't | always use the correct keywords, and it's in everyone's best | interest for these listings to actually get a good amount of | views. | | I suspect this "fuzzier" algorithm accounts for the far lower | amount of spam too. A search for "heat pump dryer" on Gumtree | will return 25 listings in a row from the same shop in | Oakleigh, whereas Facebook will show different products from | different sellers (some businesses, but mostly randos) - not to | mention the people selling their heat pump dryer without | including those magical two words in the title. | | It's uncanny how good this algorithm is at returning what the | buyer is actually looking for. | SL61 wrote: | Craigslist is basically unusable in my area if you're selling | something. 90%+ of the people who respond to you will express | interest, chat about the item, set up a time to meet, and then | no-show and ghost you. I don't know what they're getting out of | it. It's not worth the time for me to go through 5-6 of those | people for everything I want to sell. | | Maybe Facebook, etc., have this problem too, but I gave up on | selling things locally. These days I just try to pass things on | to friends and family. | spookthesunset wrote: | Dunno why the downvotes when this is something I experience | too. | pavon wrote: | Yeah. All of my posts have some flake that is stringing me | on but can't set a time to meet. Nearly a quarter of | scheduled meets end in no shows. One was after I drove 30 | miles to meet someone halfway. I won't meet more than 5 | minutes out of my way after that - you want the item you | can come get it. | bombcar wrote: | I got two kids bikes for the price of one and he dropped | that one by half because I was the only one to say I was | coming and actually show up. | SQueeeeeL wrote: | I'm not trying to justify or validate this behavior, but in | my own experience you basically want the _ability_ to buy the | item, but may change your mind. So you string a buyer along | while you make up your mind. | | (personally, I've found myself doing this and then having to | stop because the seller isn't some big mega corp, but just | some random other working class friend) | mardifoufs wrote: | Yeah, craigslist never really had any marketshare (at least not | for the past decade) in Montreal. Kijiji was king, and honestly | I prefer it to CL but even then it is getting dominated by Fb | marketplace. | | I'm not often on Facebook, so I sometimes miss kijiji but | honestly the fact that you can at least know a little bit about | the seller on Facebook is a huge plus, even if I fully | understand how that can also be a huge problem for some. The | seller ratings, plus the ability to see what else they are | selling/sold can be super helpful to make sure you aren't | getting scammed or buying a stolen item. | jaredhallen wrote: | The FB algorithms drive me bonkers. I can be looking at a | listing on one computer, and then search using the exact same | terms and filters on another computer moments later, and be | completely unable to get the search to deliver the same | listing. Absolutely infuriating. | yamtaddle wrote: | Facebook Marketplace seems to have all but killed it, here. | | You have to check Facebook anyway because schools, HOAs, | businesses, even local governments often treat it as their | primary outlet for information, as in, stuff gets posted there | first, and sometimes _only_ there. Though IG is taking over | some of that (but of course that 's still Facebook) | | Luckily my wife does that, so I can get away without having an | account, but I'd basically have to have one otherwise. If | you've already got one and already have to visit Facebook | sometimes, may as well use FB marketplace.... | soperj wrote: | I don't know why anyone would want to attach their name and | everything to stuff they are selling. | Spooky23 wrote: | It's more that you're more likely to have some context as a | buyer that you aren't meeting a scammer or criminal. | | Craigslist attracted drug dealers, hookers and fences for a | long time. People like that figure out that it's easier to | scam a buyer than do the honest work of stealing shit to | sell. | NikolaNovak wrote: | To be fair; lack of anonymity _CAN_ increase confidence and | safety in the transaction /meetup. | | (I'm not saying it always does, or that it cannot be | exploited, or that it won't eventually be scammed beyond | usefulness, etc; but it's not always a clear negative | today). | behnamoh wrote: | It helps buyers to know who the seller is. FB suffers from | bot sellers and scams. I check the person's profile before | proceeding and it gives me a sense of confidence in my | purchase/sale. | CharlesW wrote: | I personally deactivated my Facebook account, but note that | this less anonymity is a benefit for buyers. It makes | Craigslist a far more attractive target for scammers. | jollyllama wrote: | I think the reason people use marketplace is because they | already have a facebook app on their phone. One less password | to remember. The upload "just works" - never mind that the | data is poorly tagged, etc. | debaserab2 wrote: | The killer feature that Facebook marketplace has is the fact | that you can do some basic verification of the person you are | selling or buying an item from. | s1artibartfast wrote: | Interesting. My impression has always been Facebook is | somehow more riddled with scammers than CL despite the | associated accounts. It seems like it has more to do with the | transaction. | | It is hard to scam someone with an in person exchange of cash | for goods. | | Annecdotally, many CL sellers have told me to just get the | item from their yard and put the cash under their doormat | snek_case wrote: | > It is hard to scam someone with an in person exchange of | cash for goods. | | You would think so, but some asshole tried to do this to | me. We had agreed on a price ahead of time, and when he | showed up, he tried to low ball me with a 50% lower offer. | I refused to sell the item to him, and then he became | aggressive and I had to call the cops to get him to leave. | | I won't get into the details, but based on what I saw, I | think this guy runs kind of a side-business acting as a | middle man reselling tech gear. I think he does this | routinely, probably low balls people and then tries to re- | sell the same stuff on marketplace afterwards. I think tech | gear attracts assholes/scammers more than anything else | because it has a potentially high resale value. | | So, just be careful out there. Never share your phone | number with people from marketplace, and don't reveal your | home address if at all possible. Try to have a friend over | if you have people coming for transactions or do it in a | public place. | aerovistae wrote: | Weird. On the east coast it's still as populated and reliable | as it ever was. Although I don't typically buy consumer goods | on it. | JohnFen wrote: | In my stretch of the west coast, it's still as good as it | always was, too. | 8jef wrote: | CL lost Canada to Kijiji a few years ago. Now FB is taking | over. I'll probably eventually stop looking for classified ads | because of that. | dewert wrote: | Oddly enough, Kijiji never took off in Vancouver. We just | went straight from CL to FB. | pmelendez wrote: | > Until about... 5-6 years ago | | That kinda correlates to when they moved away from the | personals business | greenie_beans wrote: | you gotta search other locales to find what you want. search | nashville craigslist for guitars, search rural areas for | agricultural equipment, search lake areas for boats, etc | boatsie wrote: | Related, so many sellers are now "pro" sellers like what | happened to eBay. Keyword stuffing, prices that are comparable | to sale prices of new, constant automated reposting, etc. | TheRealPomax wrote: | Right, which is great: because CL forces folks to say whether | they're a private owner or a dealer _you can filter for those | properties_. | | And not hidden and tucked away either: it's the absolutely | very first top-most set of options on the search results | page. See those three [all] [owner] [dealer] buttons? Click | "owner". You're welcome. | tbihl wrote: | I've always wondered: what is the mechanism keeping people | honest about being owner vs dealer? | philovivero wrote: | Nothing. Dealers know to check the owner button. | | Whenever I'm buying something on CL, like say a car, I | always ask the person who answers the phone: "I'm calling | about the car. Tell me X about it." | | If they reply "Which car?" then you've reached a dealer, | not an owner. | TheRealPomax wrote: | And then, of course, you go back to CL and flag their | post, right? ...You _do_ report abuse on this free | platform so that everyone 's experience can be improved, | right? | TheRealPomax wrote: | Other than "getting your account banned for multiple | reports on multiple postings"? Nothing. If you see | someone abusing CL, you report it. If you don't, you're | just helping make sure people can keep being dishonest on | the platform. | defterGoose wrote: | CL is still alive and well here in LA. It's possible it's just | in the markets I'm looking in (tools, machinery, cars, etc), | but I've always preferred it over things like FB, OfferUp etc. | I feel like the people I meet from CL are generally much more | knowledgeable about what they have and its value. Other | platforms often feel like a relative selling grandpa's stuff | and have done the bare minimum of research to find a price | point. Usually if someone on CL lacks knowledge, it means I'm | getting a great deal that day rather than waiting for them to | realize they're asking too much in a small market. | malingo wrote: | I think it's the certain markets that determine how useful CL | is--I'm also in LA. I've mainly dealt in furniture & | electronics, and CL in other cities, particularly | Minneapolis, was a dream, so good in fact that I didn't know | FB marketplace existed until I moved to LA and had to look | elsewhere after seeing how bad the CL market for used stuff | was. | acchow wrote: | Try to find a used computer or phone or really any other | electronic. FB Marketplace has 5x the inventory. | Maursault wrote: | Facebook's interface is heavily burdened with ugly | templates, is needlessly complex and clunky. Page crashes! | Facebook is also draconian about logging in, can't see much | if you're not logged in, thus FB is elitist. You're | required to you hand over your identity and submit to | forced content and advertising. I personally fully | retreated from Facebook permanently by 2009. Good for you, | if you don't mind giving up privacy and being a product, | but it is not for me. | | Craigslist's interface isn't sexy, but it is impressively | fast and stable. No page crashes, ever. No forced content. | No login necessary to search, often no account necessary to | contact sellers. If an account is required to contact a | seller, it is anonymous and disposable. Craigslist works | the way the Internet used to work before it was taken over | by advertisers, tracking and javascript. I hope it never | changes, and I wish more web developers would take their | cues from its simplicity and potency, because the more | complex and tricky a website gets, the worse it is, | unilaterally. | _dain_ wrote: | >Craigslist is a desert, a void, an oasis of empty search | results. | | it's a desert and an oasis at the same time? | NikolaNovak wrote: | yes. | | (Also, don't forget, a void :-) | bombcar wrote: | "Oasis of Empty" | z9znz wrote: | ... which would work if the stuff outside the oasis was | cluttered with something. But the stuff outside the oasis | is also approximately empty. So where does the desert of | empty end and the oasis of empty begin? | bombcar wrote: | The desert has nothing; the oasis lacks even that. | zuminator wrote: | I get that you're saying the metaphor is strained, but in | point of fact, oases are parts of deserts, no? | _dain_ wrote: | Yes but the whole point of them is that they are non- | deserty bits inside of deserts | wkjagt wrote: | What I do like on Facebook Marketplace is that it seems to | understand what I'm looking for. On Kijiji I have to do try all | the different ways someone might have written something, | including common spelling mistakes. And since I live in Quebec, | I have to do this in two languages. On FB Marketplace it seems | to find all variations in one search. | snowwrestler wrote: | Not to be "that guy," but Craigslist has changed a lot over the | years. They've kept the same coat of paint on it (visual design) | but the way it works evolves continuously. | | For one obvious example, search results come up in cards now by | default and you can use hover arrows to go through the photos on | each one. It is far more visual experience today than it was when | search results were a compact list of text titles. | | And depending on what you search, there are tons of specific | filters that show up in the left column. Search "sailboat" and | you can filter on make/model, propulsion, length overall, year | manufactured, price, miles from location, etc. It works a lot | more like eBay or other modern e-commerce sites than the blue | links and default fonts let on. | | Keeping the old fonts and colors seems sort of like the famous | door-desks at Amazon. It looks like a functional decision, but | really the main point is to represent a particular viewpoint of | the job. | spoils19 wrote: | That sounds like a regression to me. A more visual experience | isn't necessarily better - I and most people on this site | probably prefer the compact list of text titles, since the | information is easier to parse. | | Filtering also limits search, not enhances it, as you are | prevented from generically finding things, and now have to sort | by filter. | iudqnolq wrote: | One of the defining characteristics of filters is that, | unlike categories, you can just not select any if you want to | see everything. This is true on craigslist, ebay, and every | other website I can think of that has filtered product | listings. | kepler1 wrote: | What does the expression "not to be that guy" mean? | gbudee wrote: | It means someone is aware they are being pedantic. | bombcar wrote: | The guy who slides up and says, "achshually" and proceeds to | explain how you think you're right but you're actually | completely wrong. | adolph wrote: | In an alternative universe Yahoo! also kept a 1997 interface and | the world was a bit nicer than it really turned out. | chenster wrote: | You really meant "Japanese Yahoo" https://www.yahoo.co.jp/ | welcome back to 1990 | behnamoh wrote: | But then how could they justify hiring an inexperienced ex- | google woman? (nothing wrong with being a woman, but she tried | to make a celebrity out of herself, look at her cover magazine | photoshoot). ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-09-16 23:00 UTC)