[HN Gopher] The Etherkiller and Friends (2002) ___________________________________________________________________ The Etherkiller and Friends (2002) Author : mmastrac Score : 59 points Date : 2022-09-16 15:21 UTC (7 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.fiftythree.org) (TXT) w3m dump (www.fiftythree.org) | exmadscientist wrote: | Have the commenters here extolling the virtues of these | "obliterators" actually built one? Because they don't do much. | Younger me made one ~20 years ago (actually around the time this | page first came out!) and was very disappointed in how little it | really did. Nothing happened to the hated DSL modem I wished | destroyed! So what gives? It took me a while to figure it out, | but these days I'm a professional EE and I have some insight.... | | Turns out the magnetics on an Ethernet port are good at their | jobs. Like, _really_ good. Not quite telecoms lightning-strike- | survival good, but up there. Mains 60Hz may as well be DC as far | as these things are concerned, and they 're explicitly designed | to block DC. Sure, for some configurations of magnetics you can | blow them up if you get the pin connections _just right_ , but | that requires you to do a lot more than just "connect the | transmit pins of the RJ-45 to HOT on 110VAC and the recieve pins | to Common". Because that doesn't work. And even when it does | work, it just overheats and pops the magnetics, opening them. | Nothing happens inside the device proper. | | If you want to cause some real fun you need a hi-pot tester plus | a ground bonder. Those can do things that shouldn't happen. | humanistbot wrote: | > If you want to cause some real fun you need a hi-pot tester | plus a ground bonder. Those can do things that shouldn't | happen. | | You posted this knowing someone would beg you to say more, | right? What a tease. Fine. Say more. | exmadscientist wrote: | I mean, it's 5,000 volts at 100mA for the "high current" hi- | pot or 20,000 volts at 10mA for the "high voltage" one or 40A | AC @ 8V AC for the ground bonder. They do about what you'd | expect: components pop, things arc, things arc _a lot_ at | 20kV, things smoke and then melt if you shove 40A through | them. | | It's more interesting when you break the tester itself. But | then you have to fix the tester. These are not complicated | machines (they're basically just transformers)... there's | some complexity in regulating the outputs and more in making | the measurements but most of the hard stuff is in having the | tester itself survive the horrid abuse it's visiting on | everything else around it. | jrockway wrote: | A friend and I made one of these in high school and plugged it | into everything we could find because we were complete idiots. | Literally nothing broke. My iMac Rev B's CRT did go crazy while | the device was plugged into the Ethernet port, but everything | was fine afterwards. Why would I try to break my only computer? | I have no fucking clue. Kids are dumb. | bluedino wrote: | I fried a device or two plugging a T1 into the ethernet ports. | I didn't think they'd be protected from 120V | kevin_thibedeau wrote: | I lost two Ethernet ports a few months ago from a lightning | strike on a neighboring house. The devices still work otherwise | and other Ethernet ports connected to the switch were unharmed. | They were both on a PoE switch which may have been partially at | fault (though it still works too). | dang wrote: | Related: | | _The Etherkiller (2002)_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8431936 - Oct 2014 (44 | comments) | mmastrac wrote: | The video linked from the old thread is golden! | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3_gnnz6Bkw | hsbauauvhabzb wrote: | I'd be curious to hear comments of the safety taken in this | video, other than the obvious do not do this at home. | | I would assume avoiding touching the Ethernet cable after | power was attached to avoid touching potentially melting | wire? | | Are there any mitigating factors? | geocrasher wrote: | Ah yes, the Etherkiller. I built one once, but never had the guts | to actually use it. I was quite worried about setting something | on fire :D | anonymousiam wrote: | They left this one off the list: https://usbkill.com/ | alexvoda wrote: | These are not merely killers, these are death ray obliterators. | | I mean, compared to the humble USB Killer (which was inspired by | the Etherkiller), this has a lot more oomph. | exmadscientist wrote: | In practice, the USB killer is much, much more destructive | because USB is DC coupled and it doesn't have to overcome any | protection magnetics. | xani_ wrote: | In well designed USB port you'd at least have diodes shorting | it to ground/vcc. | | But they are designed for ESD protection, so while high | voltage, not that much energy | | The problem is that there is no fuses, while ethernet | basically have transformer working as a fuse, USBkiller can | hammer the protection diodes till they burn out and then the | rest of it gets it. | NotYourLawyer wrote: | Always great to come across a website like this that's still | online. Takes me back to the good old days of the Internet. | nelsondev wrote: | Haha. I first thought this was a custom device for Ethernet over | Power lines. | | For example, https://www.amazon.com/TP-Link-AV600-Powerline- | Ethernet-Adap... | weeeeelp wrote: | Certainly some features are common between the two, like the | power saving one - albeit it's permanent. | ThePowerOfFuet wrote: | "Now Localtalk is really local." | jabbany wrote: | Kind of curious about this actually. | | IIRC ethernet cable side is only magnetically coupled to the | port/device side via small transformers. So running DC would | probably just melt the cable or transformers but is not really | likely to damage the device side (? Not actually sure about | this). | | But in this case it runs mains AC.. so... Do we expect the cable | to blow first due to the high current, saving the device, or do | would we expect the brief period of AC would cause enough induced | current on the device side to also fry that? | xani_ wrote: | Well ,first off, in POE powered devices it is connected to | device, and I'd imagine in many cases (of being cheap) it would | be directly coupled to device. | | > So running DC would probably just melt the cable or | transformers but is not really likely to damage the device side | (? Not actually sure about this). | | A _step_ of voltage, whether that 's just turning on AC on top | of the cycle or just pushing DC thru it would go thru the | transformer in form of short spike. | | So sure, looking at random transformer data they are protected | to like 1000Vrms so it wouldn't jump thru isolation, but | initial magnetic spike might, and then it is up to any surge | protection on the other side to ground that | | > But in this case it runs mains AC.. so... Do we expect the | cable to blow first due to the high current, saving the device, | or do would we expect the brief period of AC would cause enough | induced current on the device side to also fry that? | | I'd guess transformer would be the highest resistance/area | thing in the chain so it would melt first. | ajsnigrutin wrote: | Depending on the implementation, but most probably it would | burn the coils ("transformer") in the port, and probably the | whole port module around, since the energies are high enough to | burn quite a large chunk of material. | | Cables are a lot thicker than the electronics inside the port | itself, so my bet would be, port goes first, probably fails in | a way that disconnects the current, if not, the ethernet cable | would probably compete with the circut breaker on who melts | first (circut breakers, even if they're marked with (eg.) 20A | on them, survive a much higher current for a short time, before | they eventually fail, due to some electronics, especially | motors and large lightbulbs act almost like a short circut when | they're starting up). | neilv wrote: | IIRC, the Bastard Operator From Hell (BOFH) had one of these | cables in '90s. | mgdlbp wrote: | https://www.cs.umanitoba.ca/~djc/asr/ (immortalized at | https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Asr-coa-na.svg) | | http://www.faqs.org/faqs/sysadmin-recovery/ ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-09-16 23:01 UTC)