[HN Gopher] PayPal closes account of UK's Free Speech Union with... ___________________________________________________________________ PayPal closes account of UK's Free Speech Union without explanation Author : ploppyploppy Score : 124 points Date : 2022-09-22 21:57 UTC (1 hours ago) (HTM) web link (lauradodsworth.substack.com) (TXT) w3m dump (lauradodsworth.substack.com) | [deleted] | LordDragonfang wrote: | Dupe of the topic discussed at | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32923570 | [deleted] | barry-cotter wrote: | anigbrowl wrote: | _Looks up FSU on Wikipedia_ | | > After Cambridge University launched an online portal for | students to anonymously report microaggressions, the Free Speech | Union threatened legal action. The portal was ultimately | removed.[11] | | I guess they consider some kinds of speech more free than others. | | I found this article less than persuasive as it was clearly | written to arouse rather than inform or supply context. | devwastaken wrote: | Reporting of microagressions infers punishment by the | university for speech. There's always balancing. | kevingadd wrote: | No, university policies produce punishment or non-punishment. | Reporting is speech. Would you prefer that they report | publicly and drag people into the court of public opinion | without an investigation instead? Isn't that Cancel Culture? | fennecfoxen wrote: | i would have you explain your sentence because it describes | the concept of "reporting" as making an inference and i am no | longer clear about how to interpret the words structurally | | i tentatively take it to mean that you did the inference, and | it's punishment by the university, but i am not sure, because | the mechanism by which the university affects paypal is | unclear | ben_w wrote: | Without commenting on the merits or lack thereof in this case, I | think it would be useful to give some more information about the | FSU: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Speech_Union | parker_mountain wrote: | As a queer person, the second someone gets "cancelled" and | starts yelling about pedophiles, it almost always means that | they are anti-queer. | | What a surprise that this crew seems very much in this boat. | | I'm not issuing judgement on if paypal is in the right here or | not (although my knee jerk reaction is that they are not), but | the age-old "they're pedophiles" canard is well past dog- | whistling and into trainwhistling at this point. | LAC-Tech wrote: | What is this, a counter dog-whistle? | kevingadd wrote: | Does it really count as a dog-whistle if it's audible to | nearly any living human? | andirk wrote: | I call it a fog horn. In this case, I'm not hearing | anything though. It may be someone with dissenting | viewpoints, however hateful-seeming, or outright illegal | behavior. As with most touchy subjects, I find the best | path forward is to openly discuss without shutting down | voices. I believe no one needs to prove they're _not_ a | bigot, but one does need to prove someone else _is_ a | bigot. Even that is a WIP stance for me. | blipvert wrote: | I have yet to find an exception to your analysis. | ibeckermayer wrote: | Sounds like a great organization standing up for the principle | that forms the very foundation of civilization. | esteth wrote: | It sounds like a bunch of folk that are butthurt private | venues don't want to listen to their racist, homophobic, or | transphobic rhetoric. | | Then they dress it up as though "Freedom of Speech" means | private venues are obligated to provide a platform for anyone | of any opinion. | | They're opposed to cancel culture, but cancel culture is just | the natural progression of the larger platform their fringe | opinions are now afforded. 20 years ago your bigots could | find another bigot down in the local pub and when the rest of | the town found out you were bigots they stopped inviting you | to things. | | Now the same story plays out on the world stage - you've | chosen to shout your bigoted opinions to the world and the | world has decided they don't want to hear from you any more. | In return, you have 10,000 other bigots to hang out with | instead of the one other local bigot in the pub. | | I suppose there's an argument that twitter etc are | effectively "common carriers" in some sense, and that they've | manoeuvred their way into being an essential public service | and it should therefore be illegal to cut people off for | any/no reason. I'm not sure I buy it though. | 10g1k wrote: | PayPal has been blocking people, businesses, and organisations | due to real or perceived ideological wrongthink for years. This | is why more businesses are waking up and changing to Asian | payment processors. | seneca wrote: | The major credit card companies are just as bad, if not worse. | Payment processors are one of the major systems that need to be | treated as a utility. They've become far too comfortable using | their position to enforce ideology. | DaveExeter wrote: | Asian payment processors? Can you recommend any? | blipvert wrote: | The FSU/Daily Sceptic/Toby Young is conspiracy theoristic, | grifting, scam. | | He knows that he broke the T&Cs - learning to cry for fun and | profit. | | The sad thing is that TY's dad coined the term "meritocracy" and | he's the only reason why anyone pays any attention to Toby. | whoooooo123 wrote: | What T&Cs did the FSU break? | XCabbage wrote: | How did they break the Ts & Cs? | | How have they ever scammed anyone? | | These exact same talking points were all over Twitter, but with | no more substantiation there than you've given here. | pcdoodle wrote: | All while HN consistently hates on BTC. | boxmonster wrote: | I think PayPal has been hacked and they don't know the extent of | it yet and don't want to publicly comment. An intruder with an | agenda could have closed those accounts. I say they've been | hacked after I closed my account due to phishing attempts from | their domain. | [deleted] | boomboomsubban wrote: | Why would anyone remotely political trust PayPal after the 2010 | Wikileaks closure? | uncletammy wrote: | Paypal has been doing this crap for at least 15 years now. Anyone | still using them at this point has it coming. | lizardactivist wrote: | Some of these cases seem like plain censorship. Other cases seem | like something equivalent to the 10% rejection policy many US | American insurance companies have, where they will flat out | reject valid insurance claims just to raise the profit margins. | | Personally I would never dare putting anything but spare change | in the hands of Paypal or other US American payment providers. | jfghi wrote: | I'm familiar with insurance practices but have never | encountered a 10% policy. | | I'd claim instead that there is error on the side of closing | too much as contract language is rather clear and legal fees | would likely exceed the value of smaller claims. | lizardactivist wrote: | It was a few years ago and I can't find the source anymore, | but it was an interview with an ex. executive at one of the | large insurance companies who literally quoted the 10% figure | and policy. | | It may be different or non-existant at other companies. | omg_ponies wrote: | Is there a right to compel businesses to provide a service to | you? | angrycontrarian wrote: | If you belong to certain social groups with elevated legal | privileges, yes. | dhruval wrote: | Tired of this argument. | | There is certainly a right to discuss the social impact of a | business's practices. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-09-22 23:00 UTC)