[HN Gopher] How history/tech YouTube channel Asianometry reached... ___________________________________________________________________ How history/tech YouTube channel Asianometry reached 270K subscribers, $5K/month Author : aseemscreenlace Score : 347 points Date : 2022-09-27 08:08 UTC (14 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.screenlace.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.screenlace.com) | loufe wrote: | I am a very happy Asianometry subscriber. He has a bit of a | monotone delivery but the content consists of fantastic dives | into the world of electronics manufacturing, science, and | technology in general. He deserves his success. | DecoPerson wrote: | I'm a fan of the monotone delivery. My brain understands the | words better when it's like that. | gorkish wrote: | No problem with his style either, but whatever software he's | using to cut the audio together doesnt duck the cuts properly | and so they click. Subtle issue, and definitely not a | criticism, but it's emphasized because of the recording | style. | typon wrote: | It's a welcome break from the exaggerated emotions, fast | breaks/cuts, and general dopamine triggers that are littered | in your average youtube video. It's like watching Bob Ross. I | love Asianometery! | eru wrote: | I am subscribed too. | | He's sometimes a bit too (economically) left-wing for me, | but I generally sticks to well-researched facts, so it has | never been an issue that would impair my enjoyment. | andreygrehov wrote: | I started a Youtube channel about Dynamic Programming. This was | out of frustration of doing nothing during the COVID isolation. | | To my surprise, I reached 1,000 subscribers relatively quickly. I | posted my first video on Apr 14, 2020. By Jul 13, 2020 the | channel had 1k+ subscribers. So, it took 3 months. | | The videos have extremely good (IMHO) like/dislike ratio. I | somewhat proud of it :) | | I've never had monetization enabled, so never made a cent out of | this journey. On the other hand, it was crazy fulfilling. | | Since I joined AWS, I barely have time to reply to comments, let | alone publish new videos. Wish I had more time... | | I stopped releasing new videos on Feb 8, 2021. By that time I had | 4k subscribers. It's passively grown to 4.5k since then. | | If anyone is interested, here is the channel - | https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClnwNEngsXoIp_tgJ2jZWfw | andreygrehov wrote: | The comment received several dislikes. I'm extremely interested | to know why. | | If anyone dislikes, don't hesitate to explain the motivation | behind it. | | The motivation behind my original comment was to throw a | channel growth data point. | beiller wrote: | Maybe it could be interpreted at shilling your channel. I | however thought it was a perfectly cromulent comment. | iancmceachern wrote: | Asianometry has become one of my absolute favorite YouTube | channels. I love it. | moino06 wrote: | Big fan of the channel | nottorp wrote: | That is ... until google AI bans them for unspecified TOS | violations. | ForHackernews wrote: | "Hurting the feelings of the Chinese people" | MichaelCollins wrote: | Context for those who aren't familiar with this; It's a | political catchphrase of the CCP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wi | ki/Hurting_the_feelings_of_the_Ch... | TrackerFF wrote: | History channels seem to be _especially_ vulnerable to getting | brigaded by some offended party. | coffeeblack wrote: | Amazing how AdSense has been doing this since 2003 and Gg has | still not fixed it. | bliteben wrote: | The best is when they literally ban everything you've ever | worked on. Love when 6 bans come in at 12:03 am like last week. | I feel like pretty much anything I ever work on now is at risk | of google randomly banning it. It sucks that it feels like you | can't really escape it because a client always either wants an | android app or google maps integration etc. | | I can't imagine a youtube creator is at any less risk somehow. | Over a lifetime google will certainly find some reason to ban | the creator. I understand they want to protect their business | but the way they operate is especially harsh and can literally | ruin people's lives. | jerrygoyal wrote: | "I realized that if I wanted to last, I needed to make this | enjoyable." | jhallenworld wrote: | An interesting channel is Will Prowse's Off Grid Solar Channel. | He was living in his van (in CA, no surprise) until the youtube | money allowed him to buy a house (in Vegas), which he recently | paid off. | | https://www.youtube.com/c/WillProwse/videos | | House related videos: | | Sets goal: | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7j1ZVnfjKyM | | Buys house: | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhtN01Hc95U | | Pays off house: | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALDuMufycMY | | "I paid 34k every month for 10 months to pay off this house. " | | Anyway, so it's possible, but you need to have the right topic. I | think reviews and how-tos of expensive things you are about to | buy is a lucrative place to be. | ahsusbzuxbsbe wrote: | eshack94 wrote: | I love his channel and his narration style. It's a super | informational channel with no clickbait and just tons of quality | content about semiconductors and other technology. Would highly | recommend. | anm89 wrote: | Awesome channel, puts out consistently high quality content and I | find the narrator to be better than a vast majority of similar | channels who seem to all have the same annoying voice quirks | which I think they do intentionally. | yellow_lead wrote: | Like Wendover? "However." | loufe wrote: | Wendover and Asianometry I would expect to both be | exceptions. Wendover's delivery, especially for informative | content, is among the best I've ever heard. | aseemscreenlace wrote: | Yep always positively surprised by the quality of the research | done - almost always learn something new | ekianjo wrote: | Good channel but a bit lacking when you actually know the topic | well yourself. | rchaud wrote: | That's every channel, eventually. | | It's also why I stopped reading The Economist on development | economics and foreign aid issues. | treme wrote: | Did you find better? Do share | iancmceachern wrote: | I haven't found this to be the case. | treme wrote: | He gets praised consistently for doing a solid job from | people in the field. | anm89 wrote: | Yeah I mean it's youtube. I know nothing about | Semiconductors. I'm not looking for a doctoral thesis. | jjk166 wrote: | I work for a company that makes industrial water filtration | systems and his video on water filtration systems for the | semiconductor industry still taught me things. | ikealampe200 wrote: | Amazing channel, best of all is his very last advice "Don't do | gaming." | echohack5 wrote: | > Don't do gaming | | Rules are always made to be broken | mapmap wrote: | What does this mean? Don't make videos about gaming or don't | play? | bavell wrote: | The gaming niche is extremely cutthroat due to all the | competition. | o_1 wrote: | yes to both | ladyattis wrote: | I really enjoyed his videos on semiconductor developments since | it's often hard to parse what's really going on since I'm not an | electrical engineer, so none of it really makes sense to me. :) | bemmu wrote: | Interesting that he is willing to deal with receiving money from | AdSense, but not willing to deal with receiving money from | sponsors. Sounds like an opening for an AdSense-like middleman | except for sponsorships, so he could just receive money from one | place instead of dealing with multiple customers. | kiicia wrote: | please don't do that, those sponsored ads are bad already as it | is | omwow wrote: | Love a behind-the-scenes peak of a creator like this one, it's | fascinating to see. But yeah, $5k / month for the amount of work | and talent that went into this seems disproportionate, but then I | could also see this growing exponentially, where if he keeps at | it, it will make ridiculous amounts of money that's just as, if | not more disproportionate to effort invested, except this time in | his favor. Which is what I wish for him. | gizmo wrote: | 5 years and 300+ well researched videos results in $5k/mo | revenue, mostly patreon. This shows how brutally unforgiving the | youtube economy is, even when your content is excellent. I fully | expect this channel to grow to $50k/mo in the next couple of | years, but still, the stamina required to get there amazes me. | mizzao wrote: | Yes...geez, that's an insane amount of work to get to $60k/year | pre-tax. | s1artibartfast wrote: | Us median income is 30k/year | eru wrote: | Yes. But the median person who is as smart and motivated as | the author of Asionometry makes a lot more. | vouaobrasil wrote: | It is but there is a huge upside to it: no bosses breathing | down your neck (even if they are nice and hands-off, you | still have to do what they tell you), no 9-5, no nauseating | business corporate language, no commuting, interacting with | coworkers, etc. I am a content creator myself, get paid way | less than I could at a 9-5 job, and would never go back | simply because there's nothing better than doing exactly what | you love without having to waste time doing what other people | want you to do. | onlyrealcuzzo wrote: | Assuming your time is worth minimum wage - you haven't even | broken even yet. | | This is a very, very long term play. | | You have to bank on YouTube still being a dominate market, | not getting too greedy with it's algorithms or revenue | sharing, and your old videos continuing to attract a large | number of views. | | If any one of those goes wrong - you're basically working | for below minimum wage. | charcircuit wrote: | >You have to bank on YouTube still being a dominate | market | | No, you can just upload your videos on the next big | platform. The content isn't exclusive. | nkozyra wrote: | And also you'll continue to make money off of previous | work. | | That video you did two years ago will still contribute | Adsense revenue. | fasthands9 wrote: | I always wonder what his returns would be if he just | stopped posting but kept the old videos up. | | I realize it probably declines faster than you'd think - | but imagine over the course of 5 years he'd prob still hit | 100k in residual value. Which must be a nice safety blanket | to have. | seydor wrote: | Oh the joys of monopoly | lotsofpulp wrote: | Which monopoly? The video creator is free to host their video | on whichever machine they want. | seydor wrote: | So where else would asianometry content fit? | eru wrote: | Nebula perhaps? Or self-hosted? | | I'm not sure that makes YouTube a monopoly. Just like | some games work best on the Nintendo Switch doesn't mean | Nintendo has a monopoly on console gaming. | pessimizer wrote: | By that standard, there's no such thing as monopoly. If you | think there is one, you're always free to start your own | country. | themagician wrote: | The YouTube economy isn't always unforgiving. | | YouTube allows you access to a the world's largest group of | suckers as well as those in poverty who are desperate. If you | create content that targets these people, you can make bank... | and fast. While someone creating high-end education content | might get $1-$2 CPMs, someone creating targeted scam content | can make 10x--yes, $10-$20 CPMs are possible. | | Content about personal finance, coaching, "selling online", | affiliate spam, MLM and pyramid schemes, dropshipping, and | meta-content about being a "creator" all makes unbelievable | bank. | spiderfarmer wrote: | Getting there is a lot easier if you don't live in expensive | areas and 1000 dollars per month means you're living in luxury. | lotsofpulp wrote: | Is there anywhere on Earth that allows for luxury on $1k per | month? The price of equipment to make the video is not going | to be less. | eru wrote: | The author's equipment isn't all that expensive. | | Taiwan (where the author lives) has lower cost of living | than the US, but 1000 USD per month isn't quite luxury even | there. | ChuckNorris89 wrote: | removed | lotsofpulp wrote: | >Also, why sink down to 1k/month? | | Because the comment I replied to claimed "luxury" for $1k | per month. | stepanhruda wrote: | Not a sunk cost but a fixed cost. | hombre_fatal wrote: | Entirely depends on your tastes. | lotsofpulp wrote: | I would assume a meaningful definition of luxury involves | at least abundant space, food, energy, and time. For | example, working 100 hours per week is not luxurious, nor | living in a Hong Kong pod, nor having to eat ramen | because you cannot afford fruits and vegetables. | xeromal wrote: | The countryside in peru. | lotsofpulp wrote: | Would you have access to broadband internet to upload HD | video? Clean water? Sewage? Healthcare? Education? | | Supposedly, median household income in Peru is $17k, and | that is skewed higher to urban residents, so let's say | two earners earning $24k total in rural Peru would be 2x | median income of the surrounding families. Maybe it can | be "luxurious", but I would want more proof that you can | get access to reliably energy, high quality network | connectivity, and access to other goods/services one | would normally associate with luxury. | adventured wrote: | The median household income in Peru is far lower than | that figure. | | The typical monthly salary in Lima is going to be in the | $300-$400 range (minimum wage is ~$270). | | You could get to that $17k number if you had four incomes | in one household though. | lotsofpulp wrote: | I have no clue, I just quickly searched and found a | snippet of this website: | | https://www.globaldata.com/data- | insights/macroeconomic/media... | | Seemed like a high enough number that would still | validate my point. | [deleted] | missedthecue wrote: | As someone from Peru I would not recommend this | trenning wrote: | What are your thoughts on QoL living outside of major | cities in Peru? | missedthecue wrote: | Having money in the Peruvian countryside is not going to | make up for QoL because the infrastructure just isn't | there. 40% of the households in rural areas don't even | have electricity. No chance for clean drinkable water or | insulated housing. | wahnfrieden wrote: | Are there compelling examples of youtubers making money in ways | that can break this cycle? Patreon requires the same grind. | z7 wrote: | I recently stumbled over this guy: | https://www.youtube.com/c/hbomberguy/videos | | He seems to release about 2 videos a year and has more than | 10k patrons. If he gets 2$ on average from each per month | that makes 240k a year or about one million after four years. | adolph wrote: | Does merchandise/outside sales count as breaking the cycle? | | This guy (a glimpse inside) talks about how YT became a sales | lead generator for his woodworking in this video: | https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pKiWVQK-YJE | 3pt14159 wrote: | The thing is, when it comes to content this is basically the | whole game. I once, after a disagreement with a friend of mine | who is a designer about the difficulty of designing a non- | doubly symmetric gear icon, burned around eight hours on | designing some icons and put them up on The Noun Project. I'm | not a designer, a structural engineer trained software dev with | a decent eye, but no real training or work experience in | design. | | Over years the money kept coming in. I think I calculated it | out to about $20 an hour after four or five years. I literally | could have looked at this as a sort of bond, did the net | present value accounting on it, and realized better gains than | with software over the next 70 years of copyright. | | This is with no automation or market research or experience or | training. | beambot wrote: | I would love to see some of the better educational YouTube | channels get picked up by Netflix and the like... And hopefully | find a good audience & better compensation too. | grecy wrote: | His RPM and CPM are very, VERY low. With that much view time he | should be making 10x what he is straight from YouTube. | ransom1538 wrote: | Exactly. If these videos were "Asian financial advice" - this | post would be about how to hire a video production team. The | crazy good youtube money is in finance: realestate, 401ks, | investing, etc. You want to be in a market with advertisers | with deep pockets. | chii wrote: | i watch this channel because the videos are not just trash | topics solely engineered to gain ad revenue. | | A lot of his topics in the video are not related to any | advertising, and thus the CPM is low. I'm glad he's stuck | through it, because the content is excellent. | | i'm glad to hear that majority revenue actually comes from | patreon - this means people do realize the value of the | video, and there's enough willing to donate. | mizzao wrote: | Yep, CPM for finance/fintech ads are among the highest. | MichaelCollins wrote: | > _hire a video production team_ | | That's a good way to kill the authenticity of a channel, | and race to the bottom creating flashy but shallow content. | I don't begrudge a youtuber merely hiring a cameraman, but | the more people they hire on a permanent basis, the more | pressure there is to optimize for monetary success. This | means flashy well produced videos, but very shallow content | that is more accessible to a wider audience. | Schweigi wrote: | He doesn't do paid sponsorships. That would probably double the | revenue when looking at other creators who published their | numbers. | | As per article it's because of the day job who doesn't leave | too much time handling those and that the video making is a | hobby to him - I read from it he doesn't want to make it a job? | HWR_14 wrote: | > He doesn't do paid sponsorships. That would probably double | the revenue when looking at other creators who published | their numbers. | | Assuming everything else remained constant. I've seen | creators comment that adding sponsorships really hurt their | growth numbers. | bombcar wrote: | It depends on the type of content, really. | | Someone who is reviewing tools could be hurt by getting | sponsored by a tool brand, because of the obvious possible | conflict of interest. | | But that same person getting sponsored by one of the damn | VPN providers might affect it less. | | It also depends on where they put the sponsorship and how | easy it is to skip. | JCharante wrote: | It depends on the type of sponsorship. A friend turned | [cooking in a niche cuisine tiktoker] does sponsorships | where for example if the cooking step is to fry something | in a pan, you just include the 1-2 seconds of adding the | oil so that viewers see what type of oil (and brand) you're | using. They get stuff sent to them like, use our toaster in | your video and all you literally have to do is show | yourself putting the bread in the toaster if you're making | a video about like avocado toast or something. If they | scaled it up properly they could easily clear $3k/month | before counting the amount of growth that comes from | uploading frequently (they've experimented with how much | they grow per video but kinda get tired of doing it). | | I do see other tiktokers do it poorly, like having a long | lingering shot on the label that makes you realized the | video is an ad. Somehow they still get views but their | videos are really really boring. | phphphphp wrote: | I don't think it's the YouTube economy so much as it is the | creative economy. If you produce creative content, you are at | the mercy of the whims of your audience. Even in profitable or | well-funded businesses, there's a constant existential threat | associated with the whims of the audience changing. | | The problem is especially visible on YouTube because so many | creators are small, and so have a connection with their | audience but don't have the resources to absorb the costs and | risks of trying to keep up with a constantly changing audience, | but it's not a problem specific to or even especially | pronounced on YouTube. | Goronmon wrote: | _I don't think it's the YouTube economy so much as it is the | creative economy. If you produce creative content, you are at | the mercy of the whims of your audience. Even in profitable | or well-funded businesses, there's a constant existential | threat associated with the whims of the audience changing._ | | Yup. Generally speaking, people value content like this as | pretty much having, well, no value at all. They don't want to | pay for it, and they'll go out of there way to make sure they | pay as little as possible for it. | | In fact, I would even go further and suggest that many people | feel that all jobs, except for whatever job/industry they are | in, as having little to no value and should be done for | nothing. | jlarocco wrote: | > Yup. Generally speaking, people value content like this | as pretty much having, well, no value at all. They don't | want to pay for it, and they'll go out of there way to make | sure they pay as little as possible for it. | | A lot of the blame goes to the content creators, though. | | They were the ones who set the expectations for "free | content" by giving their creation away for "free". And in | that context, making $5k a month is pretty good. If I have | a garage sale, put $0 price tags on everything, and end up | with $5k afterwards, then that's amazing. | | > In fact, I would even go further and suggest that many | people feel that all jobs, except for whatever job/industry | they are in, as having little to no value and should be | done for nothing. | | That seems a little far fetched. | Nzen wrote: | I suspect that my (passive) valuation of entertainment, | given the culture that I grew up in, partly stems from | growing up with ad subsidized radio. It feels like music | is almost a public service, but for buying a receiver, | not choosing the playlist, and switching stations when | the ads come on. I suspect the availability of a public | library inclulcated similar expectations in me. | Eventually, I paid for movies and songs. But, youtube and | other internet content hosts fit most in that mode | whereby I can eat from the buffet to my limit, provided I | bat away the promotional posters as I sit down. | AndrewUnmuted wrote: | sleepdreamy wrote: | This rings true even for clearly necessary fields - I've | had clients balk at pricing for a complete revamp of their | network. Do you think I googled 'How to setup Company | Network Safely' and went to work? Years of knowledge etc; | that a lot of these guys don't care to understand | | Most people chose to be ignorant in this manner. They'd | rather spend as little as possible and denounce your skill | rather than understand why xyz costs as much as it does. | tootie wrote: | Good point. Being a creator is a tough path, but it's | probably way safer and easier than trying to make it in | Hollywood. | tehwebguy wrote: | Right -- YouTube is essentially the only platform that you | can get "all three": distribution, discoverability & revenue. | | People can make creative content and get the first 2 on | TikTok but all things equal the payout would be way, way | less. They can make money on Patreon and distribute their | content through it but there isn't enough discoverability | there for them to grow. | | There's a reason why everyone who blows up on any other | platform expands to YouTube asap. | pessimizer wrote: | > If you produce creative content, you are at the mercy of | the whims of your audience. | | More like if you produce creative content, you're at the | mercy of your distributor. Google is making significantly | more money off of the channel than the content producers are, | I wouldn't be surprised if the difference were an order of | magnitude. | jonas21 wrote: | How so? Google gives 55% of the ad revenue to the creator | and pays for all the hosting and administrative costs | itself. And none of the Patreon revenue goes to Google. | Cederfjard wrote: | In the article it said that the creator makes around 60% of | their income from AdSense, 40% from Patreon (which Google | sees nothing from). | | A quick search says that Google pays the publisher/creator | 68% on the AdSense revenue. | | So how does Google make an order of magnitude more of this | channel than the content producer? | madeofpalk wrote: | I wonder how much they would have made _without_ Youtube. If | they had to host /stream the videos themselves, didn't have | magical algorithms to push a % of viewers to them, had to | market and discover their own audience completely on their own, | had to sort out ads/subscriptions themselves, etc. | spamizbad wrote: | Considering merely having an algorithm not recommend your | channel is equated with censorship by many producers, I | assume it stalls your growth and possibly even drops your | views significantly with existing subscribers. | seydor wrote: | 34M video/page views at the very very least, how much would | it make | | You re leaving out the part that without youtube, users would | be seeking out this content, like they did with blogs before | facebook. | | I think he should do that. Host his own content and use | youtube for trailers only, a-la onlyfans | judge2020 wrote: | > without youtube, users would be seeking out this content, | like they did with blogs before facebook. | | Would they really though? His top viewed videos are "Why | the Soviet Computer Failed" and "What Eating the Rich Did | for Japan". If those were headlines for a personally-hosted | video blog, the biggest group I can see eating that up is | the Twitter mob, which, all things considered, doesn't | generate much value and is unlikely to translate into a | dedicated follower base. | | In addition, those are kind of two different interest | groups: I'd imagine less than 50% of people interested in | the Soviet Computer topic are interested in viewing/reading | a pro-"eat the rich" content piece. With YouTube, their | recommendations allow the user to only be fed the content | that correlates with what they want to see (and this is | more apparent in other parts of YouTube, eg. Channel | Awesome[0] where anything that's not in their Nostalgia | Critic or Untitled Review Show series tends to get | comparatively few views). | | 0: https://www.youtube.com/c/ChannelAwesome/videos | seydor wrote: | > doesn't generate much value and is unlikely to | translate into a dedicated follower base | | It seems to work for 'onlyfaners' who use twitter and | instagram to advertise their content | JCharante wrote: | I think that type of media has a higher conversion rate | macintux wrote: | I think you're wildly underestimating the value of | centralized discovery with a heavy user base. | seydor wrote: | Was blog content not being read/discovered before social | media? IIRC the advertisement CPMs were higher back then, | which means it sold well, too | rchaud wrote: | That was then, this is now. CPMs fell through the floor | years ago. | | Personal Blogs aren't discoverable on the web anymore | because corporate blogspam knows how to do SEO much | better and in much greater volume. | seydor wrote: | > CPMs fell through the floor years ago. | | yet advertising spending did not | rchaud wrote: | You're not supposed to be running on the Youtube hamster wheel | forever. | | Build your subscriber base, then try to pitch the idea to a | network capable of paying to commission an actual show. | acchow wrote: | You can make a shit-ton more on YouTube just cracking jokes or | being a confident liar | olyjohn wrote: | Or just buying expensive items and smashing them or blowing | them up. | musha68k wrote: | This is why you need to own the content delivery channel | itself. Dick Dale preached a lot about this with regards to the | music industry. | rchaud wrote: | You'll also need to own and pay for marketing and | distribution in that case. | | I don't know of any indie consumer video-based product that | got popular without being on Youtube. Note that I am | excluding "video courses". | | Most people can't do the marketing, it requires too much time | to learn and implement, time that cuts into video production. | For a lot of people, it's better to delegate it to the | platform itself. | KaoruAoiShiho wrote: | Mostly Asian viewers is just not it from an income perspective. | | There are other youtube channels who are super successful and do | niche Asian History content with mostly western viewers and I | assume make a lot more money. | | Like this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8n1OU9p3fhM | | If OP is not aware of them maybe he should check them out and see | what they do better. I have a feeling there's a bunch of things | you can learn from it. | | I enjoy his semi videos but honestly general history should be | more popular than semis, I think he just has to get their quality | up to snuff. Don't assume your earlier less popular history | videos is down to the topic rather than your earlier | inexperience. The stuff you said about storytelling that you | learned makes a huge difference. | spoonjim wrote: | This is why you learn to code. Because just showing up and doing | what you're told you make 3 times as much. | dopeboy wrote: | Two things: | | * his ability to scale is greater than yours | | * his work nets income even when he is sleeping | Joe_Boogz wrote: | I really enjoy channels like Asianometry & actively share this | channel with friends. | | Any others like it? | meesterdude wrote: | I watch every episode! Good for him. | | I wish he would stop pumping the newsletter. I like that he's | promoting his own stuff, but he doesn't understand why i watch | his channel - it's because they are informative videos, and give | me something meaningful to watch when i eat dinner. | | I'd love a westernamatry channel, or something similar in being a | sister channel. Maybe shorter episodes. maybe just reading news | articles and reflecting on them. Lots of formats that could work. | | the stories he tells are unique and intriguing - for me that's | the value. | Bayart wrote: | I'm surprised he's got most of his views from Asia. I've always | thought of Asianometry as being a window on East Asia for a more | Western audience. | swyx wrote: | i think just putting asia in the title turns off most people | from the west who have no interest. (no judgment, i do it too) | shmde wrote: | Having asia in the channel name doesn't make you want to | watch the videos of the channel ? | [deleted] | seydor wrote: | au contraire, i watch his videos because not a lot of people | talk about asia in non-confrontational terms | wongarsu wrote: | Just like any video about Germany has countless German viewers. | I think people generally enjoy an "outside" perspective on | their own culture. | wahnfrieden wrote: | I don't know about his service but I run popular apps for asian | language learning and have a lot of non-native immigrants / | westerners who've moved there and are still learning (often | life long), so you could still be right | stewx wrote: | 335k subscribers now, since this article was posted < 2mos. ago | nix23 wrote: | Yeah well that's not much for being one of the most informed (in | tech, history and politics) and kick-ass creators on the net. | | A really great channel. | | Shame on you Youtube! | m00dy wrote: | half of the revenue comes from Patreon. Looks like people want | this guy to make videos seriously :) | jasode wrote: | Since he mentioned the Discord benefit for Patreon, I'm | guessing the ability to _chat with him_ would be the biggest | incentive. The audience really likes getting extra access to a | creator and have 2-way communication instead of just being | passive viewers. | | His other Patreon benefit for the highest tier is early access | to videos but in observing other Youtube creators' | explanations, it's the live chat that attracts Patreon | payments. | | I do notice that some Youtubers do the reverse of Patreon tiers | from Asianometry. E.g. Real Science: least expensive tiers have | early access but no livestream chat; the highest tier has the | chat | | Everybody's trying to figure out the right mix of incentives | for Patreon. | dncornholio wrote: | I backed a few YouTubers on Patreon, but never did it for the | benefits, just wanted to give them some extra financial | support. | Bakary wrote: | That exists too but most backers are going to want either | some sort of privileged access to content or a parasocial | relationship with the creator. | seydor wrote: | I don't think youtube pays its creators well | vouaobrasil wrote: | I am transitioning to content creation and I already get paid | for it. I used to just have an engineering job. Yes, I got paid | WAY more in an engineering job but I look at it this way: the | much higher salary I got in an engineering job is an exchange | for having to do the work other people tell me to do, which I | don't really find intrinsically interesting. It also means I | have to commute sometimes, interact with others who might be | incompetent, etc. Not worth the extra money at all. | seydor wrote: | that's not an assessment about how much creators should be | paid though | eru wrote: | In some sense it is. | | Lots of people want to be content creators. Just like lots | of people want to be musicians or athletes (or pet vets or | work with kids.) Or write novels or create video games. | | Many of these people are willing to take somewhat lower pay | in return for doing something they love. | | Supply and demand do the rest. | coffeeblack wrote: | Yt just hosts the creators. They get paid whatever the ad | market pays for the niche they are in. Plus what they make from | Patron or Locals subscriptions. | seydor wrote: | I believe adsense witholds a sizeable portion of that ad | revenue. Plus there is literally no transparency in adsense | about which advertiser paid which channel. We are just | supposed to take google's word for it | wdb wrote: | Social Blade, suggests the channel earns more than that. | Wondering how incorrect Social Blade is | | https://socialblade.com/youtube/channel/UC1LpsuAUaKoMzzJSEt5... | restore_creole_ wrote: | $821 to $13,100 per month is a very wide range. The amount he | actually does makes falls within that range but it would be | hard not to. | aseemscreenlace wrote: | I think SocialBlade just gives a range since RPMs vary wildly | due to a ton of factors (e.g. geography, niche). | | I'd guess Asian viewers in the history/tech niche have lower | RPMs compared to something like American viewers in the finance | niche. | mrtksn wrote: | The earnings are strictly dependent on the audience | profile(location, age, gender etc.) and the theme of the | channel as the earnings are essentially a cut from the ad view | and click costs. | | I've watched some videos from similarly sized youtubers | disclosing their earnings and socialblade seem to be quite off | the mark most of the time probably because they don't have a | good way to estimate the profile of the audience accurately | enough. | | Rule of the thumb is, a finance channel with American audience | makes 10x-50x more per view than a Bangladeshi channel about | gaming. | | So it's not easy to guestimate. | csa wrote: | There are many comments about how little he makes from this | channel, but it seems like he's not really focusing on maximizing | his revenue. Specifically: | | - he does not do sponsored videos (too much work he doesn't want | to do) | | - he has not monetized with his own product(s) (tried merch, but | it didn't work) | | - he does not promote the videos | | After taking a look at some of his video titles, I'm fairly | certain he could make an absolute bucketload of money just by | doing lead gen for folks who specialize in Asian trade (either as | boots on the ground or as advisors). | | As an example, a recent video on Chinese semi-conductors has 161k | views -- that's the high side of his normal range. I can imagine | finance companies wanting to be connected to the "real" local | experts on this topic (not the blowhards who are a dime a dozen, | but the real folks who like to get their hands dirty with the | details) -- that connection could be worth millions. I can | imagine chip buyers just wanting to know which consultants will | give them a reasonable deal. I can imagine finance/investing | newsletters tripping over themselves for access to local experts | with specialized knowledge that would provide insights to their | readers. The list goes on. Being able to facilitate these | connections would be a huge business, imho. | | The problem is that this would require some scut work... but I | imagine it would be very lucrative scut work, most of which could | be wrapped into the research phase of his videos. | | tl;dr -- I think he could make a lot more loner from his channel, | but he doesn't seem interested in or knowledgeable about the type | of work that would generate high levels of revenue. | draw_down wrote: | hardware2win wrote: | I like his semico content | MrDunham wrote: | Clicking into the article you see that it was built over the | course of five years. And from other comments it seems that ~half | of his revenue is from Patreon. | | That means that five years of labor has netted a salary of $60K | per year (only $30k from YouTube)... Almost certainly that's top | line revenue and not net profit. | | That's... not much for the work involved. The benefit here is | with this strong presence and smart thinking he can likely turn | this into significantly more income. Perhaps as an affiliate for | travel sites or packaging historical vacation packages. But it | certainly dissuades me from any business model where showing ads | is the primary revenue driver (unless you on a platform, of | course, a la Google, Meta, et al.) | comboy wrote: | But it scales. If he keeps at it (while keeping the quality - I | watch most videos), it's likely that each year will bring as | much revenue as all previous years combined. It may saturate at | few millions subs but at that point it's not a bad profit and | revenue from potential partnerships increases. | | I'm not saying it's an easy money, but it could be much more | rewarding than working for big tech. Of course having a yt | cahnnel is still kind of working for big tech, but he seems to | be smart about it, heavily promoting newsletter, presumably to | be able to switch platform if necessary. | fullshark wrote: | It also could go to nothing any year, as audiences move on or | a youtube algorithm change murders his watchtime (Patreon a | little less risky here but it could shrink as watchtime/new | audience shrinks). | TheRealPomax wrote: | The thing to remember is that it's a two-way door: current | audiences move on, but we keep making more humans, and they | keep "discovering" what youtube recommends to them, so | realistically the threat is "leveling out" rather than | "losing viewers" if you run a quality channel that isn't | built on slagging others off. | | Plus, we're already seeing alternatives (or rather, in- | parallels) becoming quite established, most notably | Floatplane and Nebula as created-by-youtuber(s)-who-wanted- | an-off-platform-alternative. | Bakary wrote: | It's a part time hobby about things he has an interest in. | There is no employer employee relationship and no alienation of | labor. Given all that, 60K is pretty damn great. | thrdbndndn wrote: | 60K is lot for almost anyone who don't leave in America. | | Especially as a part-time job. | ddbb33 wrote: | That's not true at all!! | TheRealPomax wrote: | sorry are you saying that $60,000 is not a lot? Because | even in the US, that's a lot. | dirtyid wrote: | Great channel, but much less focus on general asian history now | that tech history with economic / industrial policy focus is | driving the eyeballs. Also sad his brief foray into shitpost | style humor got slapped down by viewers. | devteambravo wrote: | It's amazing that some right wing forum helped you spread | historical knowledge. Plants can grown on the darn(d?)est of | things. | dmingod666 wrote: | Well, he has well researched high quality content with no fluff. | Totally deserves it. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-09-27 23:01 UTC)