[HN Gopher] The 'Epic of Gilgamesh' is not the oldest surviving ... ___________________________________________________________________ The 'Epic of Gilgamesh' is not the oldest surviving work of literature Author : dbrereton Score : 24 points Date : 2022-09-28 16:10 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (talesoftimesforgotten.com) (TXT) w3m dump (talesoftimesforgotten.com) | bananarchist wrote: | It sounds like the disagreement here is over the definition of | literature. I generally regard wiktionary's fourth entry (high | fiction) to be its definition, whereas this seems somewhere | between that and the second (collected creative writing of a | culture). I was shaking my head at most of the examples given. | Now I see we are operating from two different foundations. | | Maybe this is why so many arguments open with the cliche "Webster | defines..." | shireboy wrote: | If you want to converse with me, first define your terms - | Voltaire | | I was taught that Gilgamesh wasn't the first written work of | literature, but the first written work of epic story. I don't | know if this is true, but many of the other works cited are | biographies, proverbs, etc. | faeriechangling wrote: | I don't mind that cliche at all, it's far less painful for | people to give a definition of a word than to witness a painful | argument where two people define a word in a different way and | then criticise the incoherence of the other's argument. | nottorp wrote: | Yeah, most of that list is life advice and religious texts. | Then what comes is ... proto Ghilgamesh. | | On the other hand, apparently self improvement books are older | than the first fiction :) | forbiddenvoid wrote: | It's hard to separate "I think your definition of literature is | wrong" and "I think your application of that definition is | wrong." | Maursault wrote: | > the disagreement here is over the definition of literature | | Deeply, but though we can make distinction between a modern | best seller and Brian's grammatically incorrect graffiti, | "Romanes eunt domus,"[1], in essence they are both literature, | even if the latter is fictional and framed within the larger | contemporary story, because Brian _wrote_ a message | representative of some language. | | Literature is defined by writing, and writing is defined by | symbols representing language. Always given less emphasis than | the ancient cave art found in caves all over the world are the | abstract symbols that very often accompany the graphic | depictions of animals. For all we know some of those symbols | may mean, "this tastes good," and regardless of being unable to | decipher them, they could still be the oldest extant | literature[2] so long as they could represent language and tell | a story, no matter how primitive a story. | | Before the Egyptian hieroglyphs and Mayan pictographs were | deciphered, there was no question that they had specific | meaning behind them. Though in the strictest sense, pictography | is not an alphabet, it still conveys specific messages in some | once spoken language. In my opinion, if there are any abstract | symbols that represent even the most primitive message, if it's | clear there is even some vague attempt at communication, then | it will still broadly fall under the category of literature, | regardless of ever being deciphered. | | While ultimately I agree that the epic of Gilgamesh is the | earliest _extant_ high, advanced, or complex literature, I | think whether a written story still exists or not is an | arbitrary distinction. The fact that Gilgamesh exists in the | literary form that it does necessarily means earlier examples | of high literature once existed but are unknown and likely | lost. Between Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides there were | over 300 plays written of which 33 survive. That the missing | plays no longer exist should not diminish the fact that these | were, in fact, written and were undoubtedly literature. | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romani_ite_domum | | [2] https://www.openculture.com/2019/03/40000-year-old- | symbols-f... note: Though von Petzinger herself clarifies in | her TED Talk that the common ancient symbols are not writing, I | think she's hedging for some reason (probably professional | caution) contradicting what her own research shows and | statements she makes immediately previously. | jdmichal wrote: | From wiktionary: | | > 1. The body of all written works. | | > 2. The collected creative writing of a nation, people, | group or culture. | | > 3. (usually preceded by the) All the papers, treatises etc. | published in academic journals on a particular subject. | | > 4. Written fiction of a high standard. | | So it sounds like you're basically describing definition (1). | I make this judgement because "this tastes good" is not | _creative_ or _fictional_ writing, which are key points in | definitions (2) and (4). | not2b wrote: | So if 4. is the definition, the Epic of Gilgamesh is first, | because it's in a different class than what came before. | But if 1. is the definition, the article is clearly right | as there are older works. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-09-28 23:00 UTC)