[HN Gopher] Many indoor air quality sensor products are a scam ___________________________________________________________________ Many indoor air quality sensor products are a scam Author : clairity Score : 180 points Date : 2022-09-29 19:40 UTC (3 hours ago) (HTM) web link (halestrom.net) (TXT) w3m dump (halestrom.net) | EVa5I7bHFq9mnYK wrote: | I see "wi fi connected" seems like a default choice now, not even | questioning. I had one such CO2 detector, but then I realized | that anyone gaining access to it (any employee of the | manufacturer, for example) can know exactly when we are at home, | when we are not, when we go to bed, when we go on vacation etc. | | So I disconnected it, bought a $70 device that measures | everything pretty accurately and am happy ever since. | ahaucnx wrote: | Great article and I mostly agree. | | We launched our indoor air quality monitor AirGradient ONE at the | beginning of this year. We measure PM, CO2, TVOCs, temperature | and humidity. When we started the development we would have never | thought that achieving an accurate temperature measurement was by | far the most difficult thing. | | It took us 8 hardware iterations to get it right! We experienced | with different enclsoure shapes, orientations and PCBs (component | placement). | | Our experience is similar to the author of this article: | | Your biggest enemy is internal heat produced by active | components, mainly the MCU but also by other sensors like the PM | sensor and CO2 (NDIR). | | How we solved it: | | 1) Minimize heat from energy by using components that have low | energy consumption and make extensive use of sleep functions of | the MCU as well as sensor components (e.g. PM sensors can be put | to sleep). | | 2) Make use of physics. Our monitor is wall mounted and uses the | convection mechanism. So nearly all components that heat up like | LEDs, MCU etc. are located at the very top inside the enclosure. | Optimize the vents at the top and bottom of the enclosure and | create an unobstructed air flow through the enclosure based on | natural convection. | | 3) Plan for enough space. To get temperature right, you need a | lot of air around the temperature sensor that is free from | radiation from other heat sources. So we specifically designed | the PCB to have the temperature sensor at a 'finger' at the | bottom with a lot of space to other components and ensured there | is a good air flow around. | | If you are interested to see our design, have a look at our open- | source, open-hardware DIY Pro monitor [1]. | | We integrated a lot of the things we learned designing the | commercial monitor mentioned above into these build instructions | [2] that allow you to build your own highly accurate monitor and | then also be able to change the firmware and adjust to your | needs. In fact, our kit contains exactly the same plastic | injected enclosure we use for our commercial monitor (but you can | also just 3D print the one from the build instructions and get | the other parts by yourself). | | [1] https://www.airgradient.com/open-airgradient/kits/ [2] | https://www.airgradient.com/open-airgradient/instructions/di... | ahaucnx wrote: | An interesting story: | | In our journey to get the temperature right, we made extensive | use of thermal imaging and compared our prototypes with | competitors. | | The images showed that one of these sensors got extremely hot | during operation but the temperature was nearly identical to | the real ambient temperature. We couldn't believe this. | | So we made a test and put a strong fan onto this sensor. The | temperature then dropped by more than two degrees Celcius BELOW | ambient which showed clearly that they made a software offset. | | It can be debated if such an offset is a legitimate design | choice (and I personally believe it has a lot of risks) but it | was something we wanted to avoid in our design. | megous wrote: | Looks like non-professionals have easier time with this. :) I | did put DHT22 into a breadboard, some atmel mcu on the other | side to convert from DHT's protocol to UART and half a meter of | wires to UART of Orange Pi SBC which serves as a | logger/controller. Open air design, lot of space, far away from | anything that heats up air. | | Sensors hanging off wires may look ugly, but it has benefits. | ahaucnx wrote: | Yes I agree. Much easier. That was basically our version 0 ;) | Maursault wrote: | I bought a couple of expensive remote weather sensors because | they were the only ones I could find that included sensing | atmospheric pressure and wet bulb temperature along with the | ordinary metrics like temperature and humidity. Though air | quality and particulate count is not included, I have done | without for two reasons, which is that I live in the country | surrounded by water and forest and cleaner air than I have ever | known, and in contrast, the small house is old, dusty, I can | easily see the particulates floating in the air, and because I | know it is bad, I just don't need to know any precise | measurements. My only complaint concerning the devices, which | seem to be rugged and accurate, though with an almost absurd | accompanying price tag, is that the required app and its | interface design is comically bad in every measure that could | matter. If there are interested developers, please take a look at | the product[1] and the software[2], and see if you're interested | in developing and selling me and other customers, and perhaps | even the manufacturer, an application that collects and displays | data from this family of devices that doesn't completely and | utterly suck. | | [1] https://kestrelmeters.com/products/kestrel-fire-weather-drop | | [2] https://apps.apple.com/us/app/kestrel-link/id1489485544 | z9znz wrote: | Indoor air quality can be greatly affected by all kinds of | things in your home, from the building materials to the paints, | coverings, veneers, veneer glues, fabrics, etc. etc. etc. | | So in other words, while your outside air may be quite good | such that it doesn't negatively affect your indoor air quality, | that does not at all suggest that your indoor air quality will | be good. | monopoliessuck wrote: | We really just need a group like ConsumerReports, Labdoor, | WireCutter or something that actually digs into the quality and | claims of devices. Very few people are going to buy 30 competing | options as well as a known good control and compare and contrast | them in a scientific context, but that's what's needed. | | I remember looking around for a Radon sensor for way too long. An | electronic device, a litmus-like strip test, some analog crystal | ball -- hell a mail-in lab kit bag of carbon -- but they all | seemed inaccurate. The few people that "bought two" always showed | heavy variance while the majority that bought and got a number | *loved it*. Even buying two that agree often just means the | products are consistently and predictably wrong, but most | products don't even check this box ffs. | | Reviewers that try and apples-to-apples all products by comparing | cost, size, advertised features and ergonomics are doing no | better than you or I opening up a package and appraising it. For | awhile this Google dev was putting up extremely detailed amazon | reviews for USBC cables based on their purported features v. | reality and it was wonderful, but tucked away and undiscoverable. | | The world needs multiple parties providing unbiased in-depth | reviews, but there's very little will to pay for even one group | to do something like this. Ironically, paying for information in | the information age seems almost comical to today's consumers and | while there's demand for good information, no one's willing to | open their wallets. Labdoor moved from subscription-only | memberships to "certified products" and affiliate links because | everyone wants to know what's in their multivitamin, but no one | wants to pay for an indepth review. We aren't cultivating a | supply-side that works for us, but against us. | | The result of this is shilling and fake reviews running wild. I | mean hell, consumers will buy a product knowing full well they | might get a shoddy knock off and yet it's $5 less and they can | get it tomorrow so they'll roll the dice. Sadly, we don't live in | a world where people are intimately concerned with quality and | accuracy in their purchases. | | edit: USBC not USB3 | ThrowawayR2 wrote: | Even if such a service existed, it wouldn't accomplish much. | OEMs are free to change the design and internals of their | products at any time and many have had no choice but to do so | because of semiconductor shortages. | mistrial9 wrote: | this is literally nonsense -- every electronic device in the | USA sold to consumers must conform to basic standards, and | stay that way. At face value, the reply says "you cannot | really rate devices" | monopoliessuck wrote: | Oh, of course. You can compare external product numbers, but | often these aren't updated when things change. That's not | even getting into buying Levi 501's from Kmart will get you | an inferior product compared to buying them from levi.com | despite being marketed as the same product. Companies too | will often abuse their brand and former good will in order to | ship sub par products today that look almost like their | products of yesteryear -- doubly so after an acquisition. I | have a friend that is into Rubiks cubes and when asked which | cube I should buy he just said. | | > Any of them are great, except if they come from Rubiks | | I still think being defeatist about this isn't helpful. More | information, even if it's not complete and timeless is good. | I think if this kind of information proliferated too, | companies would have a disincentive to update what is loved, | works and isn't broken. | | Also, I realize the chip shortage is a real issue and has had | genuine effects... still companies will find any external | boogie man for why their products should get weaker, their | turn around times longer and their products' sticker prices | higher. | | You can't forget the "but verify" part of "Trust but verify" | psadri wrote: | Unfortunately, there is no business model to support this. | People don't want to pay to support unbiased product review | sites. And as they say - "if you're not paying for the product, | you are the product" | bityard wrote: | > while the majority that bought and got a number _loved it_ | | This seems to be Amazon's main unspoken strategy behind | promoting positive reviews... many people want to be helpful | and provide a review of a product that they purchased. That's | great, but the problem is that most people are thoroughly | unqualified to review things: "I took it out of the box and | turned it on, five stars!" | | (And I'm not even going to mention Vine Voice or whatever it is | called, these are reviews you should ALWAYS ignore because they | are given free products in exchange for ostensibly unbiased but | implicitly biased reviews.) | monopoliessuck wrote: | Agreed, and that's if they review the product at all. | | Lots of reviewers talk about the delivery, how Amazon Prime | bungled the return or even a completely different product; | all completely unrelated to the actual features of the | product you'll be buying. Pair that with how Amazon allows | companies to put completely different products on the same | offering with "variants" that are again abused by companies | to transfer reviews from a well received product onto a | poorly received one. Most users just look at the five start | v. one star ratio in the end anyway so an electrician going | over a wire gets the same final weight as someone that | confusingly put a question in the review box. | | I've put up good quality critical reviews too and had them | silently removed. Amazon may be an okay place for getting an | item, but too many people use it as a discovery and curation | vehicle and that's where the manipulation starts and ends. I | get better product recommendations looking almost anywhere | else than the Amazon search box. | z9znz wrote: | There are lots of "favorites", but one of my favorites is | when someone rates it highly and says that they ordered it, | haven't yet received it, but are very excited to try it. So | in other words, they have no idea, but they are so hopeful | and excited they already rated it! | monopoliessuck wrote: | My favorite is the question and answer area where they | answer "I don't know". | cbhl wrote: | WireCutter (since bought by the NY Times) literally has an | article on this subject. | | https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/best-home-air-qua... | | I bought one of their prior recommendations, the "Kaiterra | Laser Egg+ Chemical", and as far as I could tell it did the | "TVOC-to-CO2" lookup table conversion mentioned in this | article, and so it would give CO2 readings that were | inconsistent with same-branded CO2 sensor ("Kaiterra Laser Egg+ | CO2"). WireCutter seem to have since updated the recommendation | to something with a different type of sensor. | masklinn wrote: | > Reviewers that try and apples to apples all products by | comparing cost, size, advertised features and ergonomics are | doing no better than you or I opening up a package and | appraising it. | | Unless you're buying every product on the market and load | testing them in your garage, some folks do a lot better than | that (e.g. project farm, or torque test channel). | | But it clearly requires time and passion, and serious rigs for | some of the tests (not everybody has a Skidmore lying around). | monopoliessuck wrote: | There are some good reviewers out there yeah. Sadly, they | often rely on the creator's passion moreso than getting paid | by their audience to provide a service. Youtube ad revenue | and Amazon affiliate links are keeping these people's lights | on more than the "thank you's" of their most ardent | "supporters". | | Google tightening the belt on Youtube monetization is | probably, strangely, the best thing that could have happened | to mostly-direct payments to content creators. Patreon and | the like have made viewers at least somewhat more willing to | pay out to access content. On the flip side, it seems to have | also led to an explosion of more biased reviewers pushing | their own discount codes and affiliate links to make up the | difference. | | There's a cultural misalignment somewhere. Journalism still | hasn't cracked the nut nor has scientific peer review. | Information curation and verification isn't cheap regardless | of how much we'd like it to be so. | Fatnino wrote: | It was usbc cables | monopoliessuck wrote: | Right, thanks. Fixed | ahaucnx wrote: | Since the 1960s we have "Stiftung Warentest" in Germany which | does unbiased indepth product reviews and is a very popular | magazine. They review more than 200 products every year and the | tests are carried out by independent external test labs | worldwide. | aoki wrote: | > For awhile this Google dev was putting up extremely detailed | amazon reviews for USBC cables | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benson_Leung | skunkworker wrote: | For tools and other items that you might get from Home Depot, | Project Farm is pretty much the standard now in my book. | https://www.youtube.com/c/projectfarm | jzawodn wrote: | Agreed. He's doing fantastic work. | agumonkey wrote: | I automatically upvote his vids now. I hope people get | inspired by him. | [deleted] | outworlder wrote: | I wonder if a DIY version would fare better on their testing? | | Something like: https://www.airgradient.com/open- | airgradient/instructions/di... | | I have bought all the parts, haven't had the time to assemble it | yet. | ahaucnx wrote: | Our old basic kit that you link above has also temperature | inaccuracies due to its small footprint but we have a new kit | that addresses these issues and is also available as a pre- | soldered version for easy assembly: | https://www.airgradient.com/open-airgradient/instructions/di... | bsder wrote: | What a useless article. How about some evidence and pointers to | things that aren't? | | Humidity/pressure/temperature are actually the three measurements | that probably _aren 't_ a scam. The sensor chips you can get are | generally well-calibrated and do what they say. Do read the | datasheet, though: there are lots of ways you can screw them up | (soldering them wrong, for example). | | The CO2, VOC and particulate sensors seem to be absolute snake | oil, though. I have yet to buy any device that "senses" these | that has any correlation to anything resembling reality. Which | seems kind of stupid because CO2 and particulate sensors | shouldn't be that difficult. Volatile organics, though, tend to | be difficult as they have a lot of confounding factors. | | I'd really love to have a recommendation for something that's | been _validated_ that isn 't $10K+. | UniverseHacker wrote: | I agree... I have a bunch of cheap indoor air quality measuring | devices, and they all consistently read temp, pressure, and | humidity close together. My CO2 meter measures exactly what I'd | expect -high levels with windows closed, correct outdoor levels | with windows open. My cheap PM2.5 air quality meter reads | almost exactly what I see in purple air when I take it outside. | Basically, I purchased a bunch of diverse cheap air quality | sensor products that I have verified all read correctly, and | are not scams. I don't think this article is accurate. | runjake wrote: | PurpleAir sensors are pretty good, according to the scientists | I've talked to (n=3). The outdoor models work inside or out. | S201 wrote: | They do! Although they require a correction factor to better | match the government's fancy air quality monitors when | measuring smoke. The EPA published a paper on it: | https://github.com/shanet/ClearAir/blob/master/docs/PurpleAi... | | While we're on the topic: Shamless plug for a PurpleAir clone I | made last year that uses the same sensors but at half the cost | (and keeps all of the data within your LAN): | https://github.com/shanet/ClearAir and | https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/adafruit-industri... | runjake wrote: | So fantastic, thanks for the reply! | yread wrote: | I wonder when will personal CO2 scrubbers become a norm. With | atmospheric CO2 growing ever higher and everyone having a CO2 | detector (and an air "purifier") at home it's the next step. | f1shy wrote: | I've an airthings (https://shop.airthings.com/GB_EN/view- | pollution.html) sensor, which measures a bunch of things. | | The pressure is constantly less than 1000 hPa (after 1 year of | having the device, not once was higher (I live at 100 m msl) so | it must be higher. When I reported the problem, the technical | support said "we use Bosch Sensors, so it is impossible that they | are wrong". | | Not only the service is trash, but also the whole interface, | which requires permanent internet connection. You can access from | your phone the status of the air at your home from anywhere in | the world... my fear is if anybody else also can. Notably, after | 1 year, there was no SW update... I really doubt the device is | safe. | | I only have it because of Radon measurements. And I hope they are | at least more or less ok. | queuebert wrote: | I've compared my Airthings to a mail-in radon test kit, and | they were consistent, for whatever that's worth. | s0rce wrote: | The south coast AQMD has a great website testing various air | quality (mostly pm2.5) in lab and real-world situations against | equipment | | http://www.aqmd.gov/aq-spec | everyone wrote: | I have seen some comments about air quality and particle counts | here that I simply did not understand.. | | I live in a remote spot in the country in Ireland. I am | surrounded by dairy farms (fields of grass with cows) I always | have my windows open, all day all year round, though my room is | super messy. People who know about this stuff, do you reckon I | have good air quality? | megous wrote: | Depends on how you/your neighbors produce heat if they are | anywhere near. Villages' air can be pretty disgusting | especially in colder months. Paradoxically, small cities when | heated by remote heat can be quite enjoyable air quality wise | all year round if you don't live near the main road. | jeffreygoesto wrote: | Relative VOC measurements at least are able to detect a no. 2 in | nappies. Great to distinguish if you should go in and change them | or would be a distraction from falling to sleep when checking. I | bulit a Pi ZeroW that measures on the side of the bed and | publishes a curve of the last hour of the values. You can see a | pretty salient drop when "it" happens. | slig wrote: | I bought a couple of Figaro TGS2602 from Aliexpress and they | were quite sensitive to "human gas emissions". | myroon5 wrote: | Why drop? Less gas afterwards? | qqqwerty wrote: | Maybe a voltage drop? Most sensors just return a voltage. And | then you have to calibrate that value and convert it into | some sort of measurement using an equation. So an increase in | VOC might result in a drop in voltage on the sensor. | notduncansmith wrote: | It's a relative indicator, so it would spike and then | (relative to that spike) drop steadily as the VOCs diffuse | and vent. | clairity wrote: | yah, i think a lot of these IAQ (indoor air quality) products | are ok at relative differences (which is mostly what lay | consumers care about). the article mainly points out that | they're not good at absolute measurements, and for something | like VOCs, it's likely using a CO2 sensor and a lookup table | that's static and only really valid for the test room it was | created in. | Majromax wrote: | > for something like VOCs, it's likely using a CO2 sensor and | a lookup table that's static and only really valid for the | test room it was created in. | | It's the other way around, usually. CO2 is more typically the | estimated value, since its direct detection involves a | relatively expensive NDIR value. VOCs as a category need some | sort of modeling and estimation, but sensors can go fairly | far by directly measuring a few species (hydrogen, for | example), and hoping. | clairity wrote: | oh, right, dunno where that brain fart came from... thanks | for the correction! | kaybe wrote: | Nice, I'd be interested in a write-up with plots! | JTbane wrote: | Could you use this to detect flatulence in adults? | IvyMike wrote: | DIY: https://projects.raspberrypi.org/en/projects/fart- | detector | dpwm wrote: | If you were to have an array of such sensors, perhaps you'd | be able to estimate direction of travel. | checkyoursudo wrote: | "I'm sorry, Frank. The sensors don't lie. I'm going to have | to ask you to leave." | fghorow wrote: | Now _there_ is a budding seismologist 's answer! ;-) | odysseus wrote: | For sure. I have a couple of Winix air quality sensors / | purifiers and they power up (with red LEDs and rushing fans) | almost immediately if anyone has a little gas anywhere in the | room. | entropic88 wrote: | My kids call our winix purifiers "fart detectors" | wil421 wrote: | What sensor are you using? I bought a few trash ones from | Microcenter. The readings were all over the place and I | couldn't get reliable numbers without smoothing numbers and | throwing readings out. One of the spec sheets even said you | would get crazy readings and would need to throw them out. | newman314 wrote: | I'm a little surprised that no one has mentioned Aranet yet. | From what I can tell, they appear to work quite well. | However, it is quite pricey. | | I did look into the AirGradient when geerlingguy put out a | video about it but they were out of stock at the time. It | looks like there might be a new version but that may be | something worth looking at. | | I tried the Vitalight CO2s but the readings were all over the | place despite recalibration with 2 devices side by side. | Ended up returning these. Do not recommend. | SrslyJosh wrote: | I have an Awair sensor, and I can confirm that the VOC sensor | is able to detect...well, pretty much anything from food to | hair products to outgassing from some new thing that I opened | up and accidentally left too close to the sensor. | tclancy wrote: | Yeah, I don't know how good it actually is, but the one time | I painted indoors the thing cratered in a way it never has | before or since. | | And my daughter keeps trying to see if flatulence will | actually drop the air quality depending on proximity. | e63f67dd-065b wrote: | I recently bought a sensor that detects temp, humidity, PM2.5, | PM10, and CO2, and the variance from the equivalent report from | the airport's weather station that's only a few minutes away is | discouraging even when it's set outdoors. Maybe I should bring it | into my alma mater and borrow some lab equipment and test it out. | | At least the CO2 says 410 when set outdoors, but the temperature | it varies by a few degrees (Celcius). The humidity is even worse, | I don't even bother looking at that number anymore. | wil421 wrote: | The sensors I bought from Microcenter were garbage in the ways | you describe. I couldn't even take readings from some sensors | because they were so ridiculous. | autoexec wrote: | I'm still planning on buying a CO2 monitor, but I'm _really_ not | looking forward to it. My plan is to buy them three at a time and | if I don 't get the same reading (or damn near it) on all three | returning them as defective and buying another three from some | other random no-name Chinese manufacturer. I'm guessing the whole | process is going to take many months and a lot of my time, and in | the end it still can't prevent a company from just giving | identical but incorrect readings. | sbierwagen wrote: | I built a CO2 meter around a SCD30 nondispersive infrared | sensor a few years ago. (~$60) Gives readings with PPM | resolution, which is good enough, since you're only going to | start noticing physiological effects above 1000 PPM. | | As the article mentions, there is substantial sensor self- | heating. (The SCD30 uses a little incandescent bulb to produce | 4.26um light, and the whole package draws 375mW during | measurement) It wants to be very well ventilated, or polled | very infrequently, in order to remain anywhere near ambient. | autoexec wrote: | This could be a cool project for a raspberry pi... | sbierwagen wrote: | The sensor I used: https://www.seeedstudio.com/Grove- | CO2-Temperature-Humidity-S... | | Claims to be 3.3V compatible, (Rpi voltage) which I haven't | verified, since I ran it off an Arduino. (Which is 5V) | | From the Seeed docs: "When activated for the first time a | period of minimum 7 days is needed so that the algorithm | can find its initial parameter set for ASC. The sensor has | to be exposed to fresh air for at least 1 hour every day." | | Disregard that entirely. When I tried to use the built in | autocalibrate, it would set the floor value to 390ppm at | some random time of day, not even close to diurnal minimum. | Not to mention outside air is more like 420ppm now. (The | problem with burning a minimum CO2 number into ROM is that | the number is always going up...) I just disabled | autocalibrate, stuck it outside for an hour, and hardcoded | an offset in user code. | | The Seeed carrier board puts an ornamental cover over the | sensor to make it look prettier. You can remove it if you | want to reduce self-heating. | | The SCD30 uses i2c address 0x61, so it should coexist on | the same bus as the BME280 temperature sensor, (0x76) if | you want more accurate room temp: | https://www.seeedstudio.com/Grove-BME280-Environmental- | Senso... (Seeed will _not_ warn about address | incompatibilities during checkout if you buy two sensors | with the same address. Ask me how I know.) If you enjoy | random number generators, you can also pick up one of the | bad hot-wire "air quality" sensors that GP dislikes. | https://www.seeedstudio.com/Grove-Air-Quality- | Sensor-v1-3-Ar... | | Disclosure, I used to work for a company that resold all | this stuff, before it was bankrupted by the semiconductor | crisis. | s0rce wrote: | I build one with the SCD41, seems comparable, was a bit | cheaper. | ThrowawayR2 wrote: | Try buying the CO2 monitors intended for | agricultural/greenhouse use from a agricultural specialty store | that's within your country. They won't be as inexpensive as the | consumer units but at least you'll have some confidence that | the readings are accurate. | kzrdude wrote: | Could you calibrate vs outdoor atmosphere CO2 from a local | weather station? | s0rce wrote: | You can just call outdoors 400ish, it doesn't vary hugely, or | just take a bunch of measurements outdoors. Some sensors tend | to zero offsets/drift periodically when they "detect" they | are outside. | briandrupieski wrote: | NDIR CO2 sensors are reasonably accurate. You can look up if | the device is using an NDIR sensor before you buy it. Monitors | that estimate CO2 based on a VOC sensor like mentioned in the | article aren't using an NDIR sensor. | site-packages1 wrote: | I have a few of the Airthings View Plus units. Can't speak | objectively but when there are fires or something degrading air | quality, PM2.5 rises, when all windows and doors are closed, co2 | rises and then falls when I open the windows and turn on the fan | blowing the air out. VOCs rise can be correlated directly with | the nest turning on our old AC unit and then with it turning off | and fanning the air out the windows. Radon seems to rise with | outdoor temperature when it gets hot out. One per floor of the | house and they are all correlated with the things above, and the | VOCs in the room with the most air conditioning blowing rise the | most, so I feel pretty happy about their efficacy. | | I've been happy with these units so far after six months. | izacus wrote: | I have these for a year and I'm rather happy with them. The | view plus acts as a hub for the minis and the values measured | correlate with smells and stale air feel of the rooms. They did | help me significantly improve my sleep quality. | | The fact that they have a good API made them worth the fairly | steep entry price. | sliken wrote: | Happy user here. I started with 2 of the BT connected widgets, | that used my phone to upload to the cloud. I then added to the | Airthing View Plus which does wifi, BT, and if you plug a cable | in will act as a gateway from bluetooth to the airthings web | service. | | Seems like a cool company, and have seen things like forest | fires, using a gas stove, and burning things while cooking all | correlate with readings. In particular I noticed that 3am in my | bedroom has a pretty big CO2 spike. I also monitored radon | before, during, and after some radon mitigation. | | I really like that at least some of their units allow exporting | their data to graphana, without any cloud involvment. I'm | unsure if the view plus does the same though. | | So for the HN crowd, lots of sensors, can use a raspberry pi as | a gateway, your phone, or a turn key view plus. Graphana | support is a big plus and you don't have to use any cloud | service if you don't want to. | | I do wish they had a carbon monoxide sensor. | RL_Quine wrote: | We got at least one which seems faulty, but to their credit | they immediately got back to us and asked for more data for | their engineering to look at. The numbers produced are | obviously very very wrong. They seem solid otherwise and are | accessible with open source tools. | RivieraKid wrote: | I'm just looking for an indoor air quality monitor for | temperature, humidity, co2 and ideally pm2.5 and pressure. Can't | believe such trivial product is so hard to find. | | There is the AirGradient DIY but I don't like the design, I'm | worried about temperature accuracy and response time and I wish | it was pluggable into a wall plug. | | In addition I want to buy an outdoor water-proof temperature and | humidity sensor running on a battery and communicating over WiFi | or BT. Also can't find anything. | Syonyk wrote: | > _I 'm just looking for an indoor air quality monitor for | temperature, humidity, co2 and ideally pm2.5 and pressure._ | | If you don't want it to be "connected," try a TemTop P1000. | I've torn one apart, and I have it in my office right now - it | seems to do what it says on the tin sanely. Temperature, | humidity, PM2.5, PM10, and CO2 levels. I have another TemTop | unit and they generally agree within some reasonable margin of | error, and they do seem to independently measure things like | VOC vs CO2 - I can see one rise without the other, depending on | what I'm doing. | | It doesn't have pressure, though. | | https://www.sevarg.net/2021/08/28/temtop-air-quality-sensors... | shadowpho wrote: | >I'm just looking for an indoor air quality monitor for | temperature, humidity, co2 and ideally pm2.5 and pressure. | | That's because it's $$$$. CO2 is hard to measure (it's inert!), | and only recently advances in NDIR allow us to measure it | directly. Those are still $50, and that's just component cost. | | PM2.5 is also around $50 for decent parts. | | Another $10 for T/H/P. Another $20 for cheapest LCD you can | find. | | Ok, so we are up to $130, but now you gotta pay for | manufacturing ($$$), PCB, hardware development, calibration, | testing, mechanical design... Probably $200-$300 total | depending on quantity. | | So, let's say you can make the whole device for $250 just in | costs. Now you gotta add software (BT\Wifi code is not fun!), | shipping, overhead, profits. So, you gotta sell this thing for | $350+. | | Would you buy one for $350? | robga wrote: | I run 4 AirGradients with ESPhome hooked up to Home Assistant | and couldn't be happier. | | In case you're not aware, the kit was upgraded this year to | move the temperature sensor a little further away from heat | sources, they now bundle enclosures with the kit (if | requested), and also sell [0] pre-soldered kits. | | [0] https://www.airgradient.com/open-airgradient/shop/ | ahaucnx wrote: | Thank you for mentioning us. Since a few months we have an | improved AirGradient PRO kit [1] that has a much better design, | temperature accuracy and enclosure. It is fully open-source, | open-hardware including 3D enclosure files. | | [1] https://www.airgradient.com/open-airgradient/instructions/ | RL_Quine wrote: | https://www.airthings.com/en-ca/wave-plus | | These have worked well for us, they don't do pm2.5 but we have | other sensors for that. | toss1 wrote: | >>such trivial product is so hard to find. | | Indeed! Although it seems the point of the article is that | while these are very basic measurements, building the | technology to reliably provide correct readings, especially | from the same board/housing as a WiFi board, is not trivial. | Sure, it's not as difficult as more complex or obscure devices, | but it is a lot more than cut & paste some sensors onto a board | with some WiFi & slap it in a box... which seems to be the | usual level of effort | | Does anyone know where we could get such devices that 1) are | actually designed to be reliable, and 2) don't need to | exfiltrate information to the seller's servers in order for us | to access it? | TylerE wrote: | For the outdoor version, the magic search phrase is "personal | weather station". | colechristensen wrote: | Except for the sensor that straight up didn't measure something | it was reporting, "scam" is a strong word for inaccuracies. | dawnerd wrote: | I bought an aranet4 which is excellent for co2 but it doesn't do | pm or vo2. I can however infer that if the co2 is high I need to | ventilate anyways. Crazy to see how high co2 rises on flights | that are supposedly "refreshing air" often. | londons_explore wrote: | I bought ~5 brands of air temperature sensor, and was surprised | to find that when I left them in a sealed box overnight, every | single one showed the same temperature to 0.1C. | | I was expecting them to have at least 10x that error! | ahaucnx wrote: | The sensor modules are often not the problem. It is the heat | radiation from other components in the enclosure that influence | the temperature. | askvictor wrote: | It's really easy to calibrate a temperature sensor. | ars wrote: | And this is why I never bought one, even though I want one. | | I can't seem to find a reasonably priced one that is actually | accurate. | s0rce wrote: | PM2.5 have decent accuracy and are certainly useful at low | price points, RH/temp work fine, particularly with separate | sensors. Pressure works fine but is pretty useless. NDIR based | CO2 (ex. Sensirion SCD31 or 41) also work fine. | | TOC is a bit of a mystery, it can probably detect relative | change. I've used them in a lab to monitor solvent vapor and | you can detect changes, hard to quantify but don't need to most | of the time. | com2kid wrote: | My cheap co2 sensor shows dramatically different readings for my | office with the window closed vs open. It is great at reminding | me to crack my window open to get more air flow. | | Its temperature sensor is within a couple degrees of my nest's | remote sensor. | | My Amazon vo2 sensor can tell if I turned my kitchen fan on to a | sufficient level to clear out whatever I am cooking. | | Lots of sensors don't need to be precise, they just need to | indicate if some action needs to be taken. | | e.g. If there is a fire, I just need the alarm to go off, I don't | care how hot the fire is. | cosentiyes wrote: | Agreed, as long as deltas are consistent I find the devices | useful. I feel like fitness tracker step counts fall into the | same category--I don't care much about the absolute number is, | but rather how that changes over time and correlates with other | behaviors. | TylerE wrote: | Seems like the best solution would be a two part enclosure... one | for the sensor, with just enough to power it (e.g. a coin | battery) and a Bluetooth LE transmitter (Or maybe even something | entirely passive like RFID could work?) and then have all the | rest of the electronics sealed off and powered seperately. | advisedwang wrote: | Sadly you can't skip to engineering a solution. If you're | designing a device getting quality requires rigorous | specification and testing, in a feedback loop with design. What | you describe might be a solution, but you can't know it's | worked without that testing, and it's premature/risks over- | engineering unless the testing shows you need it. | | It's the time and money of testing that is usually being | skipped, not the engineering itself. (Although many | manufacturers might sacrifice quality to save the cost of what | you describe anyway :( ) | 2OEH8eoCRo0 wrote: | I agree with you but for most things it honestly doesn't matter. | The time you wasted researching is worth more than whatever | difference there might be. I also think we don't need any of this | junk in the first place. | | Indoor air quality? Open a window. airnow.gov | zokier wrote: | scam implies malicious intent. being crappy is not a scam. | IggleSniggle wrote: | Maybe so, but for the consumer is there any difference? | | If you say your product does a thing, and it definitely does | NOT do that thing (but you fully believe it does that thing | perhaps on the basis of believing really really really hard), | and you sell it on the basis of that belief, especially when | said belief is easily disproven with a tiny bit of due | diligence... | | under those conditions I think it's perfectly reasonable to | call it a scam. Especially colloquially, when intent is near | impossible to know, and the average consumer does not have the | means to launch an investigation to prove intent. | kqr wrote: | Intentionally manufacturing something with tolerances wide | enough to be nearly useless and then selling it as if it was | useful sounds malicious enough to me! | incone123 wrote: | The malice is in taking my money in exchange for a product the | seller knows to be worthless. | aidenn0 wrote: | GP was implying the seller didn't know it was worthless. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-09-29 23:01 UTC)