[HN Gopher] OpenStreepMap 2012 vs. 2022
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       OpenStreepMap 2012 vs. 2022
        
       Author : curiousfab
       Score  : 268 points
       Date   : 2022-09-30 13:34 UTC (9 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (2012.osmz.ru)
 (TXT) w3m dump (2012.osmz.ru)
        
       | cinntaile wrote:
       | OSM doesn't have a layer with just satelite images like Google
       | maps has, does there exist any alternative here?
        
         | flipbrad wrote:
         | Apps can easily layer that stuff over OSM, e.g. I use precisely
         | such an overlay in Vespucci to edit OSM on Android.
        
         | trillic wrote:
         | MapTiler released a ~500 GB high res dataset. Not sure on the
         | licensing but I believe it can be used for free with
         | attribution if self-hosting.
         | 
         | https://data.maptiler.com/downloads/dataset/satellite-2021/#...
        
           | moffkalast wrote:
           | > The tiles are generated on zoom levels 0-13.
           | 
           | That's like 20 m per pixel at its highest zoom, completely
           | useless for most things.
        
           | Symbiote wrote:
           | The download button leads to
           | https://data.maptiler.com/downloads/tileset/satellite-2021/,
           | which says it is $400/month.
        
           | jillesvangurp wrote:
           | We have a subscription for MapTiler to do our in app maps;
           | including very nice satellite imagery. This data set is
           | obviously not the good stuff.
           | 
           | For reference, I've used ortho4xp to get some satellite
           | imagery based x-plane scenery. I have several hundreds of GB
           | of scenery like that for a few relatively small areas, like
           | my home country the Netherlands, the area around Berlin, and
           | a few more places. That scenery comes in at multiple GB
           | (4-6GB) for just a single rectangle on the map (1 degree
           | latitude by 1 longitude degree, depending on the zoom level.
           | You typically use it at zoom level 17 but you can configure
           | it to go for zoom level 19 near airports, which helps when
           | coming in to land. This stuff is huge. At zoom level 19, you
           | can see quite a bit of detail. It looks great from a few
           | hundred feet up in the simulator.
           | 
           | What map tiler offers us looks like it is similar quality to
           | that. I assume they are licensing some satellite data for
           | this. Zoom level 19 resolution for the entire world is likely
           | to be in the peta byte range. 500GB is probably zoom level 15
           | or 16ish. Still usable but not great if you want to zoom in
           | and see details.
           | 
           | Edit. Another point is that zl 19 and better does not come
           | from satellites but from air planes and isn't available
           | everywhere (only in populated areas typically).
        
         | Rygian wrote:
         | (Just to clear a possible misconception: OSM is a database, not
         | a rendered map. Everyone is free to render their own maps based
         | on OSM data.)
         | 
         | When we map (e.g. when we click on the "Edit" button), we use
         | satellite images from providers like Bing, Maxar, ESRI, who
         | have authorised their imagery to be used as base layer. Many
         | countries also authorize their national orthophotography to be
         | used as base layer.
        
           | cinntaile wrote:
           | Openstreetmap.org does not have a satelite baselayer that I
           | can use, so I don't get what you mean.
        
             | lucb1e wrote:
             | What they mean is that OSM is not a commercial product that
             | licenses satellite or aerial imagery, so the website does
             | not include this (it's really just a showcase of various
             | info that's in the database, not meant to be fit for any
             | particular purpose, although it's surprisingly good for
             | general use).
             | 
             | However, some image sources are available under free
             | licenses, or in Bing's case, a special license for drawing
             | roads in OSM. Many of those can be found if you go into the
             | edit mode, because the default web editor (iD) has those in
             | the background layers menu.
        
               | cinntaile wrote:
               | So you can't use satellite data (of the same detail as on
               | Google maps) without paying is basically the answer to my
               | question if I understand you correctly?
        
               | matkoniecz wrote:
               | Yes, at least if you want global coverage and/or great
               | uptime.
        
               | MayeulC wrote:
               | To spell it out clearer, though you were pointed this
               | multiple times:
               | 
               | OpenStreetMap is a database, not a website.
               | 
               | Its purpose is to reference stuff that you can see in the
               | street, not to provide a sleek map website.
               | 
               | OpenStreetMap provides map data. They are not a provider
               | of satellite data. You would have to go look elsewhere,
               | and pay _someone else_.
               | 
               | Now, the openstreetmap.org website still does a decent
               | job at showing a map, though its geocoder is lacking. The
               | website also lacks several features, some are provided by
               | overpass (https://overpass-turbo.eu) for instance,
               | https://brouter.de, etc. OpenStreetMap data is integrated
               | with satellite data and much more on a lot of websites.
               | 
               | For instance, https://www.geoportail.gouv.fr/carte has
               | aerial photography imagery for France, plus a few map
               | overlays, including OSM. French national geography
               | institute (IGN) releases free aerial photography, there
               | are other sources for other countries. If you go to
               | "edit" mode on the openstreetmap.org website, you'll see
               | aerial/satellite imagery too, licensed for free from bing
               | and others. AFAIK, that license is only for editors, thus
               | they can't have it on the main website (and that wouldn't
               | be a showcase of OSM data anyway).
               | 
               | I agree it's a bit of a shame that the openstreetmap.org
               | doesn't do a better job of showcasing the wealth of data,
               | and it could be more user friendly. There are a lot of
               | other websites that provide the same data, represented
               | differently. https://osmand.net/map for instance.
               | https://www.qwant.com/maps has vector maps and is quite
               | good too!
        
             | Rygian wrote:
             | Yes it does, when you go in edit mode :-)
        
       | tn890 wrote:
        
         | aaomidi wrote:
         | Maybe don't blacklist an entire TLD then.
        
           | tn890 wrote:
           | Since it's Russian owned, a lot of malicious actors have
           | found .ru to be a safe heaven, this is more of a security
           | thing than anything.
        
             | aaomidi wrote:
             | No, it's security theater.
        
               | marginalia_nu wrote:
               | I've found that about 80% of the bullshit my search
               | engine crawler finds is on Russian and Chinese IPs
               | (especially the Alibaba Cloud).
               | 
               | Not that there isn't legitimate content, but there seems
               | to be very little effort put toward policing the bad as
               | long as it primarily targets a western demographic.
               | 
               | This is not by any means a new development.
        
               | shakow wrote:
               | Don't forget the Bayes theorem: lot of crap comes from
               | ru/cn domains <=/=> most ru/cn domains are crap.
        
               | marginalia_nu wrote:
               | If I'm interested in reducing the amount of crap, it's
               | only the left hand of that inequality I care about.
        
               | MichaelCollins wrote:
               | The majority of English-language ru/cn domains being crap
               | seems like a safe bet. I'm sure lots of legitimate
               | businesses in those countries have such domains, but
               | those websites aren't relevant to an English speaker not
               | living in those countries.
        
               | MayeulC wrote:
               | Oh wow, I was looking for your search engine a few months
               | back, but couldn't recall the name, and my searching
               | turned up nothing, even here on HN somehow.
               | 
               | I just came across the open-sourcing blog post. Thank you
               | for doing this. Search is something I'm quite interested
               | in. Is there a public mailing list somewhere to discuss
               | marginalia-related stuff? I'll probably look into
               | contributing at a later point (I've also always wondered
               | how good sqlite+webtorrent would do fare a search engine,
               | for instance -- not saying I'll make a PR for that, but
               | I'd be curious to investigate stuff like that).
        
               | tn890 wrote:
               | Since .ru hosts a LOT of malware that's running wild, and
               | I don't particularly care to view anything on .ru, we'll
               | just agree to disagree.
               | 
               | Good arguments btw.
        
               | andrepd wrote:
               | You don't particularly care to view anything on .ru, but
               | you're complaining that you can't open a website (which
               | you'd like to view) which is on .ru. What a bizarre thing
               | to say.
        
               | orbital-decay wrote:
               | _> and I don't particularly care to view anything on .ru_
               | 
               | Why complain about it then? Seems like a non-issue.
        
         | EGreg wrote:
         | Um... OK?
         | 
         | Did you blacklist .sa since 2014 too?
         | 
         | https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2021/country-chapters/yemen
        
         | moolcool wrote:
         | That seems like a you problem
        
         | sbaiddn wrote:
         | You're complaining that a site that you went out of your way to
         | block doesn't load?
        
         | aeyes wrote:
         | Because anybody in any part of the world can contribute and use
         | OpenStreetMap. The developer of this tool just happens to be
         | from Russia.
        
         | 88840-8855 wrote:
         | lol
        
       | lallysingh wrote:
       | I prefer OSM to Google Maps when looking at maps. You get better
       | maps with more detail. But, I have to back to GM to find anything
       | with an address. The business database on OSM is poor, and I
       | don't think the system for estimating the location of an address
       | on a street has been particularly good either.
       | 
       | They were terrible years ago on GM, so this is part of the
       | evolution. But I can see how OSM will end up better than GM, like
       | Wikipedia over Encyclopedia Brittanica, but it needs a bit more
       | to get there.
       | 
       | Btw: the online process to make changes on OSM is wonderful and
       | encouraging.
        
         | SergeAx wrote:
         | On the other hand, when I need to find a nearest trash
         | container in a new location - OSM is always there for me.
        
         | dont__panic wrote:
         | Google is on a warpath of advertising to the detriment of its
         | base products. Nowhere is this more apparent to me than Google
         | Maps, mostly because there isn't a great alternative if I want
         | to find businesses near me.
         | 
         | Everyone who can help OSM should. There's no reason OSM can't
         | be a wikipedia-quality product, to the point where close
         | source, advertising-beholden alternatives can't meaningfully
         | compete. Add businesses in your town today! Add business hours
         | if you can! Fix any errors you see. And try to switch to OSM
         | for everything you can. Every little bit helps.
        
           | aqfamnzc wrote:
           | There are a lot of problems that still need to be solved with
           | OSM to make it on par with GM's overall utility. (I say that
           | as a very active local OSM contributor and data consumer)
           | Reviews, geocoding, political issues within the OSMF, and
           | incomplete address information to name a few. Some of them
           | can be solved by having more active local mappers, but others
           | I don't have an easy answer for. Hopefully these are growing
           | pains, as I desperately want to see OSM succeed.
        
       | playingalong wrote:
       | A comparison of current Google Maps with current OSM would be
       | interesting too. I bet people would be shocked with how much
       | details there are mapped.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | smcn wrote:
       | This is blowing my mind, I had no idea it was as good as it was.
       | I always remembering it being slow, empty, and just not really
       | usable.
       | 
       | This is incredible work and I'm sorry that I held such a negative
       | opinion of it for so long!
        
         | mpol wrote:
         | I held the same negative opinion, until about 2018. Then I
         | thought "enough is enough" and started contributing in my area.
         | This in the hope and expectation that other area's will have
         | volunteers working who started out with the same emotion in a
         | somewhat catalysing effect (is that a word?). Now I am quite
         | proud of maintaining shops and bars in my city, at least I
         | think I am the person who updates those the most :)
        
           | specialist wrote:
           | Is this a manual process, generally?
           | 
           | I was wondering if someone(s) consume data feeds from local
           | govts. Stuff like permitting, licensing, change-of-address.
           | 
           | I ask because it seems that I'll idly spot a business, while
           | driving around, that I'm sure didn't turn up in a search. (I
           | mostly use Apple Maps.)
           | 
           | Then I thought "surely adding new listings could be
           | automated".
           | 
           | My next thought was "well, just because it's in the database
           | doesn't mean Apple, Google, Yelp will show it".
        
             | openmapsguy wrote:
             | Almost everything is manual unless an import for an area is
             | happening. Imports require a bunch of documentation and
             | notifications before the data gets pulled in. The data is
             | typically for building and addresses from the government.
             | 
             | Adding together OSM's rules are stacked against imports,
             | the vocal anti import contingent and specialized software
             | knowledge needed means that few imports happen.
        
       | Maxburn wrote:
       | Left blank white square. Right OSM map.
       | 
       | Is this a prank or broken? What year did OSM come out?
        
         | akgerber wrote:
         | The tiles on the left map from 2012 load extremely slowly,
         | presumably due to traffic.
        
       | crimsoneer wrote:
       | Honestly, OSM is a damn triumph.
        
         | specialist wrote:
         | Emphatic agreement. I was doing CAD & GIS in the 80s. We
         | certainly foresaw this stuff. Even so, I'm just gobsmacked by
         | the number and quality of all the map & GIS systems.
        
       | breck wrote:
       | Don't believe what you read in the newspapers, this gives me hope
       | for our world.
        
         | JustSomeNobody wrote:
         | Do believe what has been accurately reported. Also, have hope
         | for the world.
        
           | MichaelCollins wrote:
           | > _Do believe what has been accurately reported._
           | 
           | Believe things if you believe them to be true.
        
         | AlexTrask wrote:
         | If this gives you hope you must check the humanitarian
         | openstreetmap team. They are so great https://www.hotosm.org/
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | hashtag-til wrote:
       | I wonder how to go about to collaborate to the OSM ecosystem with
       | code. Does anyone know what are the cool projects within OSM in
       | C/C++? (i.e. not web stuff)
        
         | Doctor_Fegg wrote:
         | Two C++ projects I'm involved in that you might enjoy:
         | 
         | https://github.com/systemed/tilemaker
         | 
         | https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend
        
         | mvexel wrote:
         | Not necessarily cool perhaps but a critical piece of OSM
         | infrastructure is osm2pgsql[1].
         | 
         | Also important tools in OSM land are osmium[2] and imposm[3]
         | but the latter I think is Go not C++.
         | 
         | [1] https://osm2pgsql.org/ [2] https://osmcode.org/osmium-tool/
         | [3] https://imposm.org/
        
           | uneekname wrote:
           | osm2pgsql makes it surprisingly easy to spin up your own tile
           | server using OSM extracts
        
         | westnordost wrote:
         | The most accessible general-purpose map app for end users
         | (Android and iOS) is written in C/C++. This is pretty high on
         | the cool and useful scale: https://organicmaps.app/
         | 
         | Both map renderers Tangram-ES and Maplibre-GL -
         | https://github.com/tangrams/tangram-es and -
         | https://github.com/maplibre/maplibre-gl-native are also written
         | in C/C++.
         | 
         | Finally, most routing software, such as OSRM or Valhalla are
         | written in C/C++.
        
         | mattficke wrote:
         | Take a look at Tippecanoe, which is under active development
         | again[0]. The original developer, Erica Fischer (who is
         | wonderful to work with), has a fork[1] where new work is
         | happening.
         | 
         | [0] https://felt.com/blog/erica-fischer-tippecanoe-at-felt
         | 
         | [1] https://github.com/felt/tippecanoe
        
           | enf wrote:
           | Thank you!
        
           | durkie wrote:
           | Woohoo! This is fantastic news
        
           | cancan wrote:
           | (Co-founder of Felt here) Thanks for the kind words! We are
           | lucky to have Erica on our team. If you ever want to talk
           | maps, my email is can@felt dot com!
        
         | apetresc wrote:
         | Here you go:
         | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:C%2B%2B
        
           | hashtag-til wrote:
           | Yep, I got there like 1 minute after asking this FAQ. Thanks.
        
             | idealmedtech wrote:
             | There's lots of mentions of Maps.ME, which is no longer
             | open source. The spiritual successor is called Organic Maps
        
               | N19PEDL2 wrote:
               | I use Maps.me as my main map and navigation app as I
               | don't like that Google knows where I go, and I can say
               | that it's a very good alternative to Google Maps. However
               | I have to say that now I'm a little worried because it's
               | Russian-owned. Happy to know that there's an open-source
               | alternative.
        
               | sorenjan wrote:
               | OsmAnd
        
               | teddyh wrote:
               | Important clarification: OsmAnd~, installed from F-Droid.
               | Do not install OsmAnd straight from the default app
               | store.
        
               | yaddaor wrote:
               | Or do, if you want to monetarily support the developers
               | in a convenient way.
        
         | lucb1e wrote:
         | The biggest help one can probably be to the project is to
         | create or improve user-facing software. OsmAnd is still clunky
         | and ugly to the average person coming from FAANG Maps, for
         | example. The iOS version is even worse. Some alternative apps
         | exist with better UX, but they're often missing features. There
         | are also some web projects out there that aim to be a google
         | maps website replacement, but none of them are quite there.
         | 
         | It could also be a niche thing, like if you make an app that
         | shows the nearest defibrillator or other emergency facilities
         | that people might need in a pinch. Any area gaining good
         | coverage of this type of data would immediately have an app to
         | turn to. With adoption also comes the influx of new
         | contributors.
        
       | benbristow wrote:
       | OSM needs some form of gamification adding to it.
       | 
       | Google Maps app is great, lets you gain points by adding
       | information & photos & reviews etc. They even send you a free
       | bespoke pair of socks or a badge if you're active enough. So fun
       | to add photos and then see how many views they get (I posted one
       | of a chippy in Scotland (for Americans that's Fish & Chip 'Thick
       | French Fries' shop) which got over 1.4 million views - mental).
       | The location history feature suggests things to contribute which
       | helps too.
       | 
       | Would be good to have something similar to make contributing fun.
        
         | nonethewiser wrote:
         | > I posted one of a chippy in Scotland (for Americans that's
         | Fish & Chip 'Thick French Fries' shop) which got over 1.4
         | million views - mental
         | 
         | Do they protect against self promotion somehow? seems like it
         | would be an easy way to market something to a huge audience. I
         | mean something like giving a completely legit review then
         | dropping a link to your website or something.
        
         | jxramos wrote:
         | I concur completely. I was having my young son learn how to use
         | the computer focused on input devices and simple UI
         | interactions by having him annotate buildings and pools in OSM
         | for a few random towns friends live in. I thought he'd very
         | much more enjoy this if it was gamified in some way. He did it,
         | got the hang of the UI, but then it grew tedious so he moved on
         | to something else.
        
         | BetaDeltaAlpha wrote:
         | Web3 is on it https://hivemapper.com/
        
         | mkaszkowiak wrote:
         | Pokemon Go upon release encouraged people to contribute to
         | OpenStreetMap in my area, as Pokemon weren't spawning in
         | incorrectly tagged areas :)
        
           | alias_neo wrote:
           | I thought Pokemon used Google Maps like its predecessor,
           | Ingress?
        
             | mkaszkowiak wrote:
             | If I remember correctly, at first Pokemon Go used Google
             | Maps to display the actual map, but it still used OSM data
             | for the spawning algorithm. Later on they made the switch
             | to only use OSM.
        
               | Tostino wrote:
               | The changes to Google maps api pricing made it entirely
               | unsuitable for a whole lot of apps.
        
         | alt227 wrote:
         | This is the main thing I hate about google maps. I refuse to do
         | free work for google in return for 'fun'.
        
           | martyvis wrote:
           | That isn't the main return for me. It is knowing that you
           | have contributed to the community corpus of knowledge that is
           | almost impossible to come otherwise. For instance I had the
           | to visit a data centre that I had previously been to but was
           | under a new owner. The pin had Equinix but not the site code.
           | Once I confirmed it, I submitted the edit for it to become
           | Equinix SY6. It apparently has since been used thousands of
           | times.
           | 
           | I also enjoy adding a food shot or a representative photo of
           | places I have enjoyed as a small reward and enticement for
           | others to do likewise.
        
           | everybodyknows wrote:
           | Try thinking of it as work done to help other real people.
           | 
           | I found the "Emergency" door of a local hospital hard to find
           | IRL, so I added a photo of it from the driveway POV. Another
           | sort of real person you can help are the web-clueless owners
           | of local small businesses.
        
             | ibz wrote:
             | I tried to look at it that way, but... it only helps other
             | people until Google decides to drop that particular
             | feature, after which all your work is gone forever.
        
             | alt227 wrote:
             | Instead of supplying a mega corp with some free information
             | to increase their monopoly on directions, maybe you could
             | have just mentioned to the hospital staff that they could
             | do with a new sign pointing to the door?
        
               | martyvis wrote:
               | I think the point of having the online map accurate is so
               | people can plan better ahead of time. We had this exact
               | situation recently when my MIL needed to go to get CT
               | scan in a hospital campus but my wife wanted to plan
               | ahead which of the many entrances she should drop her off
               | at. The actual hospital web site is a labrynth of the
               | type that government bureaucracies excel at.
        
             | jxramos wrote:
             | there is some aspect there about how web-savvy business
             | owners can be and how easy it is to bring business to them.
             | It'll be great to see that playing field fleshed out in
             | time.
        
           | renewiltord wrote:
           | Personally I just use it for me. Even if they made it so that
           | nothing is shared, and it bookmarks my edits I'd be happy. I
           | don't want to keep a separate override list.
        
           | crazygringo wrote:
           | This is definitely one of the trickiest ethical questions for
           | me -- and it applies not only to Maps updates, but also
           | writing Amazon reviews, and so forth.
           | 
           | On the one hand it's free work benefiting the corporation...
           | but on the other hand it's genuinely helping sometimes
           | thousands of other people. I benefit massively from reading
           | Amazon reviews, and it feels good to give back. But it is
           | also a contribution that further entrenches Amazon (or Google
           | Maps), it's not like Wikipedia where contributions can be
           | used by anyone.
           | 
           | What do we do when we can help other users, but doing so also
           | supports corporations for free? Although then again, I've
           | never paid a dime for Google Maps and use it daily, it's
           | literally a major part of my life -- so does _getting_ the
           | product for free also play a role?
        
             | alt227 wrote:
             | I appreciate your viewpoint, and in some ways I agree.
             | However I see it mostly from a competitors point of view.
             | If you were to start up a new directory/mapping service,
             | you would need to set up a team of people paid to gather
             | this information for you.
             | 
             | For example if you wanted to put in your new directory
             | whether company A has a car park at their premesis or has
             | disabled access etc, you would need to pay somebody to
             | either go there and perform a survey or call them up and
             | ask them. Googles monopoly enables them to just ask the
             | question to everybody that has ever been there and get the
             | data returned back into the system automatically and free.
             | 
             | I see this as anticompetitive and so I choose not to
             | participate.
        
               | crazygringo wrote:
               | Yeah, this makes me think further and it feels like one
               | solution could be legislation that declares companies
               | never own user-supplied content -- that when users submit
               | data like Amazon reviews or Craigslist posts they become
               | public domain. Competitors are free to scrape them
               | however they can.
               | 
               | It's harder for map corrections though, as the user-
               | presented data mixes commercial and user-supplied data.
               | Maybe legislation should require regular data dumps of
               | all user-supplied content much like Wikipedia makes
               | available in XML form? Then no scraping is even required.
        
             | stevage wrote:
             | Agreed. Overall I see it as a net negative to society if
             | Amazon succeeds so I don't help.
             | 
             | Contributing to Stackoverflow is my one exception.
        
           | dewey wrote:
           | I also want to hate it, but in reality I recently uploaded my
           | first picture and then get monthly updates on how many
           | hundreds of people have seen it and I have to admit the
           | gamification works :(
           | 
           | On the topic: I think it would be a good idea for OSM if done
           | in a good and non-technical user-friendly way.
        
             | mvexel wrote:
             | This is a pattern that OSM could adopt. OSM data is used by
             | about half of FAANG and countless smaller companies and
             | organizations directly and indirectly (through Mapbox for
             | example), so your contributions are seen by millions if not
             | billions, depending on where you are.
        
         | mcv wrote:
         | In my experience, OSM data is usually better than Google Maps.
         | The only problem is that Google Maps has the better app.
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | GekkePrutser wrote:
         | Most of the contributions to OSM are commercial now. Most of
         | the big names except from Google have people working on
         | improving the maps.
        
           | eMerzh wrote:
           | sorry but that is simply not true... I think there are areas
           | where it can be, probably those more remote, or where there
           | are less contributors but at least in western europe, the map
           | is built and maintained by individuals like me. Maybe helped
           | with external datas but still carefully handpicked and
           | integrated by individuals
        
             | mvexel wrote:
             | The statement is at least partly true. Nearly all big
             | corporations and many smaller ones have people on the
             | payroll contributing to OSM. And there are entire countries
             | where paid / commercial editing makes up the majority of
             | contributions to OSM. See this post from last year that
             | breaks it down: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Jennings
             | %20Anderson/diary....
        
               | diggernet wrote:
               | Hang on... I can get _paid_ to edit OSM instead of just
               | doing it for fun? Where do we find those jobs?
        
         | mvexel wrote:
         | I maintain a website called MapRoulette which is not pure
         | gamification but breaks down map contributions into small
         | tasks. It has some elements of gamification (badges,
         | leaderboard).
         | 
         | For more task-based editing with gamification elements check
         | out StreetComplete, an Android app.
        
           | mistrial9 wrote:
           | if people don't know it -- MapRoulette is massively
           | successful and a giant contribution to Openstreetmap
        
             | ryandrake wrote:
             | I also used to have a lot of fun with the KeepRight tool.
             | Something oddly satisfying about taking a small geographic
             | area and completely removing all flagged "problems". Feels
             | like taking an ugly .C file and fixing all the warnings and
             | lint errors. Only problem with KeepRight is I found it had
             | a lot of false positives.
        
           | int_19h wrote:
           | The concept is great, but the map on the site is very buggy
           | on the desktop (Edge 105). Trying to zoom in with mouse
           | wheel, it often randomly zooms out and in again. Trying to
           | pan when dragging while zoomed in and near task markers, it
           | will often pan back after releasing the mouse, and in one
           | case, I've seen it pan back and forth between two points on
           | the map in what looks like an infinite loop. It seems that
           | it's trying to do some kind of snapping to the markers, and
           | ends up fighting the user and/or itself.
           | 
           | Also, the markers disappear entirely past a certain zoom
           | level. When that happens, zooming out one notch does not
           | cause them to reappear, either - I had to do like 4 levels
           | before they'd show up. The worst part is that it also happens
           | when you click on a marker and the map auto-zooms on it.
           | 
           | EDIT: just realized that for that last problem, what happens
           | is that a single combined marker (the one that shows a
           | number) is broken up into individual markers. The problem
           | there is that those individual markers often end up outside
           | of the viewport, and so it looks like the combined markers
           | just disappeared.
        
         | Rygian wrote:
         | I do not oppose.
         | 
         | But personally, I have a ton of fun just mapping for the sake
         | of it. Seeing my contributions rendered is a satisfaction.
        
           | ibz wrote:
           | Same here. I think mapping is fun and it should be done by
           | people who love doing it.
           | 
           | Doing it because you get a pair of socks or some smiley
           | clippy character telling you something cute is very
           | different.
        
             | fragmede wrote:
             | No it's not. We're talking about a silly pair of socks or a
             | quirky avatar message, not, y'know, actual amounts of
             | money. You can't pay rent or buy food or taxes with a pair
             | of socks. Someone doing mapping for free, with the hopes of
             | getting a pair of _socks_ is much closer to this
             | hypothetical mapping purist than a 3rd party contractor
             | that doesn 't care about cartography and is just doing it
             | for the paycheck.
        
         | pwg wrote:
         | > OSM needs some form of gamification adding to it.
         | 
         | Take a look at StreetComplete [1]. It is gamification of
         | updates to OSM.
         | 
         | [1]
         | https://f-droid.org/en/packages/de.westnordost.streetcomplet...
        
           | petesergeant wrote:
           | Every time I see this I seriously consider buying a cheap
           | Android device to play with it
        
             | [deleted]
        
           | Grimburger wrote:
           | The last time I submitted a few months worth of my travels at
           | once after doing a hundred or so of these
           | challenges/questions and got a bunch of notifications
           | lambasting me for not updating the moment I did instead of
           | later. Honestly didn't realise you had to manually submit,
           | thought it just happened automatically.
           | 
           | Was a really rude intro to the _community_ and reminded me a
           | lot of SO or Wikipedia with its gatekeeping.
           | 
           | I've never submitted a single thing since then. If that's how
           | you treat newcomers then I want nothing to do with you.
        
             | aqfamnzc wrote:
             | I've seen some gatekeeping in the OSM community as well. In
             | this specific case, this is also (in my opinion) due to bad
             | tooling. Basically the easiest way to keep an eye on an
             | area is to use a tool that shows changesets whose bounding
             | box includes a certain area. So you could make a single
             | tiny edit in both NY and LA, the bbox would ping a huge
             | swath of the US. This happens all the time, actually. It's
             | annoying, but the way I see it that means we need a better
             | way to see changesets that actually affect a specific area.
        
               | jxramos wrote:
               | yah the change set visualization could indeed use a lot
               | of love. I think it would be worth it, something like
               | beyond compare's image diff could be a good start in the
               | right direction
               | https://beyondcompare.gitbook.io/project/other/how-to-
               | compar...
        
             | osmsucks wrote:
             | Funny, I've had a similar experience, and stopped
             | contributing because of it. My case was even more egregious
             | as autosubmit _was_ enabled on StreetComplete, but
             | unbeknownst to me at the time such submissions are batched,
             | so if you edit local places that you're visiting (vacation)
             | and places far away that you're intimately familiar with
             | (home), it can still end up in one big changeset that spans
             | an enormous geographical area... After that I had a couple
             | of folks breathing down my neck and nitpicking every change
             | -- and one of them tried to support their snark with
             | http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/crybaby.html, which is
             | possibly the stupidest writeup I've ever seen -- no, thank
             | you, I can take my contributions elsewhere.
             | 
             | OpenStreetMap has strict demands on how contributors should
             | structure their changes, but has no way to enforce them.
             | The best it has is having someone review your changesets
             | _after_ they've been already submitted, when it's too late
             | as the "damage" is done. Start implementing a technical
             | solution to problem, instead of disciplining the ones who
             | are volunteering their time trying to curate your dataset
             | for you.
             | 
             | (Also, if StreetComplete is a repeat offender, start a
             | conversation with its devs instead of reprimanding users.)
        
             | yaomtc wrote:
             | It does happen automatically, pretty sure it's always
             | worked that way. Maybe you experienced a bug?
             | 
             | > The user's answer is automatically processed and uploaded
             | directly into the OSM database.
             | 
             | https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/
             | 
             | Of course uploading a few months of changes all at once is
             | going to cause issues, naturally some will conflict with
             | other changes that have been made in the meantime.
        
               | infthi wrote:
               | There is a setting that disables autoupload. Some people
               | may want to minimise the number of edits made from their
               | account, and some people may not want to leave a trace of
               | locations they've visited together with exact timestamp
               | they've been there.
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | 2Gkashmiri wrote:
             | i've been using streetcomplete for a long time now, i just
             | keep the mobile data on and it keeps uploading fixes and
             | stuff as we go.
        
             | mcv wrote:
             | This is terrible. I have no experience with it myself, but
             | if OSM wants community contributions, they need to make
             | sure that people feel welcome to contribute. Lambasting
             | people for getting something wrong is not helpful. Thanking
             | them and advising them how to do it better next time would
             | be much better.
        
               | pwg wrote:
               | > Thanking them and advising them how to do it better
               | next time would be much better.
               | 
               | Thanking them and advising _is_ the recommended way to
               | handle this.
               | 
               | Unfortunately, as happens in all large crowdsourced
               | areas, some don't adhere to the recommended ways and "do
               | their own thing", often to the detriment of the project
               | as a whole.
        
             | mvexel wrote:
             | As someone who belongs to the OSM community, I am sorry
             | that you had this experience. Gatekeeping is an unfortunate
             | byproduct of a crowdsourcing project, it seems.
             | 
             | I hope you reconsider and try again. Many of us are
             | actually here to help.
        
             | SideburnsOfDoom wrote:
             | > Honestly didn't realise you had to manually submit,
             | thought it just happened automatically.
             | 
             | in my experience, you don't have to manually submit in
             | streetcomplete, and it does happen automatically.
             | 
             | > a few months worth of my travels
             | 
             | Was this travels in your local neighbourhood, going home
             | daily, or one trip to another country or in a very rural
             | area? I'm asking if you had constant data connectivity,
             | intermittent, once daily, or none during that time?
             | 
             | It sucks to have a bad first experience from a Gatekeeping
             | community. Of course, as newbs, we try to move slowly with
             | small changes first to test the waters. That worked for me,
             | sorry that it did not work for you. I also take the point
             | that was raised about not editing based off months-old
             | data.
        
             | matkoniecz wrote:
             | > Honestly didn't realise you had to manually submit,
             | thought it just happened automatically.
             | 
             | It happens automatically in default configuration.
             | 
             | You can enable manual upload in settings if you want, but
             | then, well, you need to upload it manually.
             | 
             | I am contributor to StreetComplete - so maybe I will add
             | feature to start reminding about upload if edits are old.
        
           | JeremyNT wrote:
           | This thing is so much fun! I love wandering around a new area
           | and filling in the details.
           | 
           | One thing I wish it had was the ability to add an entirely
           | new building. I'm currently living in a town that is
           | experiencing massive growth and I'll often see a structure
           | that's still a vacant lot on osm, and I don't think you can
           | add it with StreetComplete.
        
             | pwg wrote:
             | > One thing I wish it had was the ability to add an
             | entirely new building.
             | 
             | If you want to add an entirely new building on the go,
             | there is Vespucci:
             | 
             | https://f-droid.org/en/packages/de.blau.android/
             | 
             | But, honestly, adding a building on a phone sized screen,
             | while quite possible, is much more easily done with either
             | of the two desktop editors:
             | 
             | JOSM, Java based: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/
             | 
             | iD, Web based, this is the editor available from the "Edit"
             | button from the OSM website: https://www.openstreetmap.org
        
             | betamaxthetape wrote:
             | The easiest thing to do for such cases is to add a note,
             | perhaps with a picture of the building if you're
             | comfortable.
             | 
             | There must be folk who dedicate their time to searching the
             | OSM database for unresolved notes, because whenever I leave
             | a note on StreetComplete mentioning an inaccuracy (e.g: a
             | path where there isn't actually one, a driveway marked
             | incorrectly as a road, etc.) I get an email alert a few
             | days later notifying me that the note has been resolved -
             | often by someone who lives in an entirely different country
             | (and who can use the information I provide in the note plus
             | the satellite imagery to resolve the note).
        
           | benbristow wrote:
           | Android-only :(
        
           | marssaxman wrote:
           | Thanks for the reference! I've just installed StreetComplete,
           | and expect it should provide a good excuse to take some walks
           | around the neighborhood.
        
             | betamaxthetape wrote:
             | This is exactly what I have found! StreetComplete
             | encourages me not only to take regular walks, but also to
             | explore new areas local to me that I haven't previously
             | visited (since, after a while, you need to move to a new
             | area to find 'quests' that you haven't already completed).
             | 
             | I have discovered lots of places in my local area thanks to
             | StreetComplete!
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | escapecharacter wrote:
       | With the title in the typo (OpenStreepMap), I was expecting a map
       | of where Meryl Streep was sighted
        
         | w0mbat wrote:
         | You mean typo in the title? This is getting silly, I hope I
         | don't make any mistaks in muy comentt.
        
       | mvexel wrote:
       | Some background from the guy who maintains this site at
       | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Zverik/diary/399925.
       | 
       | There is a script (disclaimer, that I wrote) to set up a couple
       | of docker images so you can create / host something like this
       | yourself: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mvexel/diary/399939.
       | It requires downloading of a "full history" OSM data file for the
       | region of interest.
        
       | cavisne wrote:
       | It's interesting to look at the local edits on osm. In my area
       | it's mostly from Amazon and Lyft, based on proprietary imagery.
        
         | ZeroGravitas wrote:
         | There's a few ways for volunteers to trace proprietary imagery
         | and data into OSM with the permission of the owners of the
         | images.
         | 
         | I'm guessing you're talking about private, proprietary imagery?
        
       | agumonkey wrote:
       | Wonderful improvements.
        
       | GeorgeHoneywood wrote:
       | A while ago I made something a bit like this, but it is an
       | animation of all the years between 2007 and now.
       | 
       | https://maps.honeyfox.uk/
       | 
       | It only works in my town in the UK, so don't try scrolling the
       | map too much.
        
       | uwagar wrote:
       | how do i turn on english names for places that are labeled in
       | local language?
        
         | karussell wrote:
         | It is not possible with raster tiles, but the OSM database
         | might still have the name in English.
         | 
         | (You can have a look into vector tiles like from MapTiler or
         | their open source project openmaptiles.org)
         | 
         | I just found this example (has nothing to do with openmaptiles
         | as far I can see):
         | https://js.protomaps.com/examples/multi_language.html
        
           | spiekerooger wrote:
           | It actually is possible with raster tiles as well - see e.g.
           | the local chapter work in France (
           | https://www.openstreetmap.fr ) or Germany (
           | https://www.openstreetmap.de ) or the osMap project with 10
           | different language versions (
           | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/osMap ). All those are
           | produced with raster tiles.
           | 
           | But you are right as this approach does not scale well in
           | regard to using it for all languages out there. So a vector
           | tile stack is a better approach for just switching languages.
        
             | karussell wrote:
             | Yes, I meant switching languages is not possible. Of course
             | you can pre-generate your raster in many languages...
        
         | snorthpole wrote:
         | Try https://www.osmap.uk - OSM with English labels globally.
        
       | tezza wrote:
       | Scrolling around Broadway I see                 Avery Fisher Hall
       | 
       | is now                 David Geffen Hall
        
       | chiubaca wrote:
       | plugging a lil data viz i did while a go that plots the latest
       | OSM edits on a map in real time-ish along with a nice chime...
       | 
       | https://musical-osm.netlify.app
       | 
       | I'm always surprised by how active it is whenever I visit it. OSM
       | is such an amazing project.
        
       | HanClinto wrote:
       | For everyone else who is waiting for the page to load, here is a
       | screenshot of the data comparison:
       | 
       | https://imgur.com/gallery/iQpmXO9
        
         | SideburnsOfDoom wrote:
         | That's hardly the total of "the data comparison" - you can
         | scroll it anywhere. I found my local area, halfway around the
         | world.
        
       | laurent123456 wrote:
       | It's down. What is it supposed to show?
        
         | curiousfab wrote:
         | HN hug of death :(
         | 
         | It showed/shows a side-by-side view of Open Street Map 2012 vs.
         | 2022.
         | 
         | See https://shtosm.ru/all/verni-mne-moy-2012/ (or translated:
         | https://shtosm-ru.translate.goog/?_x_tr_sl=ru&_x_tr_tl=en&_x...
         | )
        
           | moffkalast wrote:
           | I still don't quite see what the point is, both pictures seem
           | very similar in terms of detail density, but with slightly
           | different proportions.
           | 
           | OSM editing is usually done over satelite imagery these days,
           | so I would imagine the old one must've been very far off in
           | some areas.
        
             | Zverik wrote:
             | The story of mapping is different for every corner of the
             | world. E.g. in the blog post there's a pic where we mapped
             | the city approximately due to absence of satellite imagery.
             | In this post
             | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Zverik/diary/399925 it
             | shows that some regions like Africa were nearly empty ten
             | years ago, before the Humanitarian OSM Team lauched their
             | operations. And in 2012 the focus was mostly on basic map
             | features like roads and rivers, while now we're adding
             | final building outlines.
        
         | betamaxthetape wrote:
         | It is a side-by-side comparison of OSM data from 2012 (left)
         | and the current OSM data. In my local area the difference is
         | massive: the 2012 data has some roads but that's about it, no
         | buildings, house numbers, etc. That's all present on the 2022
         | version (disclaimer: partly because I spent several months
         | walking around mapping things with the StreetComplete app [1]).
         | 
         | For me it isn't down, just taking a very long time (multiple
         | minutes) to load the 2012 data.
         | 
         | [1] https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete
        
           | capableweb wrote:
           | Is there something like StreetComplete for iOS?
        
             | Zverik wrote:
             | There are few editors for iOS, but all quite good. Try
             | Every Door (https://apps.apple.com/app/every-
             | door/id1621945342) and Go Map
             | (https://apps.apple.com/app/id592990211).
        
               | habi wrote:
               | Every Door is by Zverik, and it's very good!
        
           | Semaphor wrote:
           | I can't open it, but here it's the opposite :( OSM used to be
           | amazing, better than google, now it's horribly outdated. It
           | shows several stores in my street that have closed over 6
           | years ago.
           | 
           | I actually found StreetComplete a few days ago and have
           | started fixing issues, at least for my neighborhood.
        
             | Varyag wrote:
             | Cool. you're being the change you wish to see in the world
             | :)
        
             | pwg wrote:
             | > now it's horribly outdated. It shows several stores in my
             | street that have closed over 6 years ago
             | 
             | OSM is mostly volunteers, and if no one has happened by on
             | your street in the last 6 years, then no one has noticed to
             | update the map.
             | 
             | > I actually found StreetComplete a few days ago and have
             | started fixing issues, at least for my neighborhood.
             | 
             | This is the expected outcome, locals fixing local issues.
             | Given a sufficient amount of that, and you have a better
             | map than googles offering. Of course, as you discovered, if
             | no one is around to make the fixes, the data also goes
             | stale.
        
             | beej71 wrote:
             | Well done on fixing those issues. I've been updating stores
             | in my area, too.
             | 
             | And OSM is the only map that shows the new roundabouts near
             | my house. I just put them in yesterday after riding my
             | bicycle around them several times to get a track.
             | 
             |  _We_ are OSM! If it has shortcomings, we 've no one to
             | blame but ourselves.
        
       | eliaspro wrote:
       | When looking at these then/now renderings, one needs to take into
       | account, that only very little of the actual data is rendered on
       | those maps.
       | 
       | The database contains an incredible level of detail which can be
       | used in completely different contexts and I'd say what's rendered
       | is roughly only 1/10th of the data
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-09-30 23:00 UTC)