[HN Gopher] Notes against note-taking systems ___________________________________________________________________ Notes against note-taking systems Author : Tomte Score : 162 points Date : 2022-10-01 20:11 UTC (4 days ago) (HTM) web link (sashachapin.substack.com) (TXT) w3m dump (sashachapin.substack.com) | mindaslab wrote: | I use a text file to take notes. It works perfect. | low_tech_punk wrote: | From neuroscience perspective, it is the _Anticipation_ of the | task that releases dopamine, not the "Doing" of the task, hence | the appeal of all the productivity porn. | | And as a corollary, it could be the _Anticipation of difficulty_ | in tackling a daunting task that makes you avoid it, rather than | the actual difficulty in tackling. | | So, the best way to getting into the flow state and getting | things done (pun intended) is to force yourself to just do it. | athenot wrote: | > So, the best way to getting into the flow state and getting | things done (pun intended) is to force yourself to just do it. | | And also reducing as much friction as possible. For me, that | means, reduce temptation to style and ultra minimal note | categorization. | | * New Note in my OS's default, no-frills note app. | | * Start typing. | | * Done. | | I can always search it later with keywords. Getting it out of | the brain is already an immensely feeing act, anything else is | bonus. | | (I do some post-notetaking categorization but it's not | systematic and I allow myself to just leave it in the default | bucket of uncategorized notes.) | all2 wrote: | Minimizing friction has been the game-changer for me. I don't | avoid easy-to-do things, I just do them. If I can pre-load | getting rid of friction I do. | | For example, a meal plan generator was an expense I justified | because it grossly simplified meal-planning and shopping. | Removing that bit of friction made me much more likely to | stick to my plan to more healthily. | itsmemattchung wrote: | Did I over-engineer my note-taking process? From the outside, | probably. But I've tweaked my system overtime so I spent less | time fiddling with it and more time writing and producing | creative work. | | I take lots of notes using Obsidian and organize the notes by | tagging with keywords. Overtime, the notes clutter the entire | system and I find it difficult to keep track of the notes. | Instead of abandoning this particular tool -- moving from one | tool to the next deludes us into thinking its a tooling problem | -- I decided to track some key metrics[0] around my note taking | system, the metrics serving as a feedback loop. | | Ultimately, my goal of note taking is not to take notes: it's to | publish writing. To that end, I've designed a note taking system | that I consider to be as simple as it can be. | | [0] https://digitalorganizationdad.substack.com/p/sparse- | keyword... | smm11 wrote: | I'm not smart enough to understand what I just read, but I've | been using OneDrive for years. I have a notes file for each week, | and tag each thing I write down. I also have a traveling notes | file, for projects that are new, in progress, and expiring. | | Accessible from Win, Mac, Linux, iOS and Android. Nothing to | install or maintain. | | When bored I might open the third week of March 2018 and see what | I was interested in, and my mindset. | itintheory wrote: | I'm using OneNote also, but with daily notes, organized into | monthly sections. This worked well for about a year, but became | somewhat cumbersome. Fortunately the only way I'm ever using | notes older than a week or two is via search anyway, so it | doesn't really matter that much. | c7b wrote: | > I am waiting for any evidence that our most provocative | thinkers and writers are those who rely on elaborate, systematic | note-taking systems. | | How about this? | | > My notebooks aren't a record of my thinking process. They are | my thinking process. (Richard Feynman) | dopu wrote: | _elaborate_ being the keyword here. Taking notes is not the | same thing as constructing a zettelkasten system with which to | take notes. | [deleted] | smegsicle wrote: | i always took that to mean that _writing_ them was the primary | thinking process, but it 's certainly not clear from just the | quote | personjerry wrote: | I think we conflate two types of note-taking: 1. | List-style notes of things we need to remember 2. | School-style notes of information and ideas | | I think the former requires a tool, but nothing particularly | sophisticated - Apple Notes for example with its search indexing | is fine | | I think the latter we write only to stimulate our brain to | process information and learn better. | | I think there is a discrepancy where a lot of tools attempt to | make Type 2 notes more "convenient", i.e. to trying to somehow | make them an extension of our brain, but the truth is that it's | like hacking a hard drive to work as fast as a CPU register -- | retrieving and working with information is always going to be | orders of magnitude slower than working through your thoughts in | your brain. | ASalazarMX wrote: | I think this is it. I have a single markdown file for all my | casual notes (1), and a folder structure for my permanent notes | (2). Notes of type 2 are the most valuable long-term, and it's | worth the time to select what to store, and to structure it | right. | | I'm always on the hunt of my ideal open source, lightweight, | non-cloud, cross-platform, mobile-friendly hierarchical note | taking app, but I know I'm asking too much, maybe I'll never | find it. Meanwhile I use plain text editors. | bbkane wrote: | I use gitjournal.io to sync my folder of markdown notes | between PC and phone. I wrote about my little ensemble of | editors and tools at https://www.bbkane.com/blog/how-i-take- | notes/ | cogitoergosome wrote: | Org-mode on Emacs checks all those boxes. The only issue | might be the learning curve of core Emacs. | bastijn wrote: | ...Getting lost in learning org-mode is a fantastic way to | avoid creating things... | redavni wrote: | Came here to say this. I have a highly evolved note taking | methodology/snippet setup(common MAC address prefixes | etc)/auto-insert timestamp every line that I use VS Code for. | If I spoke to someone 15 months ago, I can tell you who and | the exact time/day and some shorthand notes about the call. | | These notes are invaluable. | volume wrote: | That sounds more powerful than Lion Kimbro's version | (https://users.speakeasy.net/~lion/nb/book.pdf). You should | document it! | DelightOne wrote: | > non-cloud & cross-platform | | Small question: how do you expect "automatic sync" to work | "between platforms without a cloud"? | kristjank wrote: | Syncthing :) | DelightOne wrote: | Ahh.. so you want to only sync locally between devices.. | or you want it to support your special cloud-protocol so | you can run your own cloud-server... . But wouldn't the | second part be cheating, not naming it cloud-based? | projektfu wrote: | Syncthing with Wireguard/Tailscale is not exactly local, | not really "cloud". | itsobvioushuh wrote: | Syncthing | gigel82 wrote: | Different people understand different things when talking about | notes and note-taking. | | I use a self hosted Trilium Notes instance for organizing tidbits | of information like todos for work/home, lists of products for a | planned purchase, tiny bash / PowerShell scripts that do a | particular task that I don't do often enough, links to stuff I | want to eventually read and so on. | vinay_ys wrote: | > When something can be like work or like play, never make it | work. | | So true! | the-printer wrote: | The commonplace book is a very valuable concept. | arkitaip wrote: | We need to have a conversation about how most of these tools are | about coping with anxiety, stress and information hoarding rather | than handling complex work. I sometimes mess around Trello more | than I do real work but at least I've stopped introducing new | tools into my life. | ChildOfChaos wrote: | Yes, I sometimes spend way to much time in Trello, it's the | only app/system i've ever stuck with. | | Sometimes I can spend much longer than I would like to admit, | 'figuring things out' writing things down, going through a lot | of thoughts then organising it all into Trello, only to find | out, it was likely what I already knew anyway and despite the | feeling like i was missing something or needed something extra, | that wasn't the case. | | However, it does help me process, massively, mentally, although | it might not increase my productivity as much as I feel like it | should, it does help me make sense of everything and the world | and therefore able to actually go do things without feeling so | confused or if i'm doing the wrong thing all the time etc which | allows higher productivity as a by-product. | weakfish wrote: | The fantastic book "Four Thousand weeks: time management for | mortals" touches on this in depth. | temende wrote: | As an avid note-taker, I don't think any of this is un-true. I'll | just say for myself I do it because I find note-taking genuinely | enjoyable and meditative. I agree that if you're trying to | optimize the professional "ROI" of note-taking you'll find the | returns fade away pretty quickly. But I do it because it's fun, | not because of the supposed ROI. | kzrdude wrote: | I just need a way to both have a thinking note taking system, | while also not letting todo items get lost. | | My best thinking note system is just a notepad for handwriting, | but todo items disappear very quickly in there, which is not | ideal (but sometimes it's good, that things naturally slide out | if they are less important.) | larve wrote: | Any article that pretends to know what the right way of taking | notes (say, "This is known as a commonplace book, and it is about | how detailed your note-taking system should be unless you plan on | thinking more elaborately than Leonardo da Vinci." in this | article) is missing the point. | | People think differently, people have different purposes and | goals, people have different constraints on their time, their | memory, their field. Can you procrastinate on note-taking? Sure. | So can you on writing, and publishing, and building an audience, | and writing papers, and doing the dishes. | | Can people have a fantastic creative output by just opening a | blank page and jotting down their thoughts? Sure. Can other | people write great books with an elaborate notetaking system? Of | course. There are plenty of people out there with terrific, | obsessive note-taking and reference systems, Kubrick being one of | the prime examples. | | As someone with what looks from the outside to be an | overarchitected note-taking system ( | https://publish.obsidian.md/manuel ), it is a system that works | great for me, and it is a system that makes me more creative and | helps me discover ideas I would have never been able to | articulate without. I used linear sketchbooks where I would write | and draw whatever for years, filling hundreds of notebooks, and | it came nowhere near my obsidian setup in terms of output and | effectiveness. | chrisweekly wrote: | Thanks for sharing! I dig your vault. | Swizec wrote: | > it is a system that works great for me | | The dig is that many note-taking enthusiasts work for the | system rather than the system working for them. | asdfasgasdgasdg wrote: | It's possible for both things to be true. Perhaps for a rare | few a more elaborate system is required, but for most it is a | hindrance. A piece of advice doesn't need to be totally | universal to be useful. | awinter-py wrote: | the point about salience is important, _but_ people differ in the | quality of their memory | | stephen king used to be anti notebook ('writer's notebook best | way to immortalize bad ideas'), then later in life was like 'oh | my memory is no longer good, I write things down now' | | jk rowling (skilled in her craft if not public relations) has | file cabinets full of organized creativity -- calendars for the | days of the year, vast collections of ideas for names | | my sense is that most visual artists have sketches and prototypes | (including da vinci), but this is 0% my area. I suppose you can | argue that a sketch is 'the thing' and not notes for the thing | naillo wrote: | I find writing things down in a notepad (that I barely ever look | at again) helps with retention and reduces it looping in my brain | as much (relieving it to think about and process new things). | Anything more complex than that (e.g. notion) is probably | overkill/productivity reducing. | ravenstine wrote: | That's my essential philosophy with note taking. I tried | different note taking apps and having lots of structure and | organization in favor of just using Notes.app on macOS and just | sticking any random notes or written things in there with no | actual plans on coming back to those notes. If I _do_ , I use | the search feature and hopefully I provided enough detail in | the target note. And if I didn't, well then maybe what I wrote | down wasn't that important anyway. | aappleby wrote: | My note-taking system, basically the same since college: | | 1. Write down every nontrivial observation in a flat text file. | | 2. When that file gets longer than a few pages, transcribe it | into a new file while leaving out or combining or rephrasing | everything that now seems trivial. | | 3. Repeat until you've either memorized everything or don't need | the info anymore, then delete the notes. | | In retrospect this is similar to spaced repetition, but with a | subjective "this feels trivial now" interval instead of a fixed | interval. | samsquire wrote: | I've been journalling computer ideas out in the open since 2013 | using GitHub as README.md files. | | I create a new GitHub repository when I get to 100-300 entries. I | number the entries with markdown headings and a title that | captures the thought. | | The reason I create a new repository is that I try only announce | my idea repositories when they're complete. I want people to come | back and not miss entries I add throughout the week. | | I am up to 450+ entries purely by writing whatever idea comes to | mind. I do not have a process. I add to the end of the journal. | | Why do I recommend this approach? The journal and notes can be | modified on any device that has a web browser since you can use | the GitHub web interface on Android, Windows, Mac and Linux. | | GitHub has a hidden feature of a table of contents on the top | left of the README.md so you can jump to different ideas. GitHub | also creates named anchors for markdown headings so you can link | between ideas. I do this to refer to previous ideas. | | IntelliJ also has a markdown editor so I also use that. | | The more you journal and write the more inspiration you shall | have. The more you try the more you get. So I strongly recommend | my approach, just get something on the page and stop worrying if | it shall be perfect. The value comes from writing and rereading | and editing your thoughts. | | One benefit from using GitHub is that you don't need to learn how | to create a post each time you come to write so it can become a | habit. | | See my profile for links. | munificent wrote: | This point is so good and so important: | | "Getting lost in your knowledge management system is a fantastic | way to avoid creating things. Or calling that friend you're | estranged from. Or doing anything else even mildly threatening. | It's also a fantastic way to convince yourself that | unpreparedness is what's between you and creative work. If you | believe you're unprepared, know that you will never transmute | into the perfectly prepared person that you think exists in the | future." | nextos wrote: | But if you do it well, it's the opposite. Luhmann, who came up | with Zettelkasten, is known to be one of the most prolific | scholars in the last century. | | Zettelkasten was essential for this. The thing is that his | original system was incredibly simple. I think that's what | people are missing. Plain Org or Markdown files on a Git | repository are a great way to mimic Zettelkasten. You don't | need more and restrictions are actually very liberating. | dumpsterlid wrote: | Org mode is so incredibly powerful but also so painfully | beautiful in it's simplicity if you dont go overboard with it | colordrops wrote: | Too close to home | oliverbennett wrote: | I always framed this more as 'the tools will not save me'. A | better pen won't make me a better illustrator, no | system/framework/methodology will take in garbage and spit out | gold. But, in retrospect, I think I should partly blame seeking | a foolish level of preparedness. I'll try to recognise/abstain | from this 'preparbation' in the future. | cube00 wrote: | This explains why project managers spend their days hiding in | JIRA | xani_ wrote: | "Just write it anywhere with as light structure as possible" | works just fine with modern search methods | | "A directory with a bunch of markdown files" is pretty portable | too and there are few apps making that a bit easier. | | I do divide "just a random notes" from "cheatsheets I use for | stuff I use rarely enough to not remember" but that's about most | organization. Just a descriptive title and working search | function is enough | examplary_cable wrote: | I believe there's a sweet spot between note-taking as a | procrastination cope and adding actual value. As in, storing | important insights that might trigger more insights in a | different context(future). | | The value of note-taking is undeniable, it's like a new "layer" | after the neocortex where your memories are not exponentially | decaying by the lack of usage. So utilization is not the sole | factor for recall. | | If done well note-taking be be considered "externalized | cognition" where you instead of holding everything in your brain | and treat as a storage + compute. You just compute. Anything | important will be there in your notes. This allows you to have | more "mental energy" to actually draw connections between things | instead of struggling to remember them. It's like the beta | version of neura-link or other intelligence-augmenting | technologies. | | I'm working on such a thing right now [1] It's like | roam(outliner) but also have a HTML(plain text, stable) Engine | for you to build more things inside of it. | | [1] https://github.com/ilse-langnar/notebook | hyperrail wrote: | I'm having some trouble understanding what note-taking systems | the author is attacking. There are some hints: | | > _Getting lost in your knowledge management system is a | fantastic way to avoid creating things._ | | > _All of the above applies to reading books about note-taking, | taking courses about note-taking, and watching videos about note- | taking._ | | > _I am waiting for any evidence that our most provocative | thinkers and writers are those who rely on elaborate, systematic | note-taking systems. I am seeing evidence that people taught | knowledge management for its own sake produce unexciting work._ | | It sounds like Mr. Chapin is referring to formalized techniques | or processes for format and organization of notes. But he doesn't | give any examples, and I'm not familiar with the ones he hints at | - I've never watched any YouTube videos on note taking or read | any books on organizing your thoughts. | | When I was in college, I took detailed notes in paper notebooks, | and still do so occasionally when I'm sitting in a lecture. | Otherwise, I send narrative emails to myself, write more | business-style notes in Microsoft OneNote, or doodle in a small | memo pad. It's clear to me that this is not what he means by a | "note-taking system," but what is? | AlanYx wrote: | I think the author is largely setting up a strawman. He's | alluding to various structured notetaking methodologies | (presumably, elaborate wikis, zettels, concept maps, etc.) but | then says those methodologies are fine if you're doing | detailed, real research work. But honestly, isn't that the only | type of person who uses these things? Who would spend all this | time building a giant structured notebase just for bits of | information of personal interest, with no real application in | mind? Most people would lose patience quickly. | yellowapple wrote: | I suspect that's the author's point: unless you're doing | detailed "real" research work, you probably don't need or | even really _want_ the myriad tools optimized for the sorts | of structured notetaking and mindmapping and whatnot that | such "real" research work entails. | | Said point resonates with me quite a bit. It's always | inspiring to see people with elaborate Org-mode setups or | what have you to maintain every last detail of their lives, | and being the disorganized and forgetful hot mess of ADD and | possible undiagnosed depression and/or anxiety that I am, | it's tempting to think "wow, if I just adopt this complex | system with these cool tools then I'll be able to actually | get my shit together and not be a complete fuck-up" - and | every time I give into that temptation, I learn the hard way | that a complex organizational system only really works for | those who are already prone to self-organization, and doesn't | magically turn chaos into order - and then I'm sad again. | harterrt wrote: | Probably he's referring to zettelkasten systems. | labrador wrote: | Chapin isn't against note taking. Chapin is arguing that any note | taking system should be kept simple so administering it does not | becomes a clever way to distract yourself instead of doing real | work. Note taking could be procrastinating, in other words. | | I get the point. Larry David of Curb Your Enthusiasm and Seinfeld | keeps a small paper journal in his pocket for jotting down notes. | An extreme example of note taking is probably the guy who spends | all his time trying to photograph and video tape his vacation to | the point that he isn't actually "present" to enjoy his own | vacation. | | tldr: Be careful your note taking doesn't interrupt and degrade | your creative "flow" and resulting output | bboylen wrote: | I agree with the author in not being a fan of huge note-taking | systems. | | The areas I have found notes useful are short term to-do lists, | and notes that store links to things I want to read/buy/etc. | | Anything more than that and the operational overhead becomes too | annoying to deal with for me | oxff wrote: | > systems | | exactly. | | let your own organization and system just spring up on its own | mountainb wrote: | This doesn't make much sense. If your notes are just going to | inform something that is low stakes that will not be reviewed by | anyone for accuracy, then it's perfectly serviceable advice. For | the vast numbers of note-reliant professionals who need to be | able to cite accurately to sources, this advice is childish. | | Do you need someone else's system? No, and I didn't even know | that this "problem" existed before reading this. The advice ought | to be amended to encourage readers to build their own note-taking | systems that make sense for them in context. Another useful | nugget of advice is to tailor the note-taking style for the task. | A freestyle method is certainly appropriate to support an off- | the-cuff speech to colleagues, but isn't appropriate for academic | or legal research. | | The notion that structure is somehow bad is also not salient when | the body of research becomes very large. If you are working with | research from 100 different books or drafting a legal argument | that cites 50 different cases, statutes, and other sources, then | it really helps to have some structure in your notes so that it | is easy to browse and search through them. When a mistake due to | sloppy notes is on your ass and will have bad results for | everyone relying on you, then making it "like play" rather than | "like work" will only have catastrophic results. | itintheory wrote: | I don't know the author, but it sounded like advice geared | toward creative writing , not necessarily factual or technical. | munificent wrote: | The author literally said: | | _There are serious reasons for systematic note-taking: perhaps | you need to summarize the literature on some element of the | mitochondrial background radiation of early childhood | geography, or something like that, and you have to keep track | of a million references to do the thing at all. If your note- | taking system is adapted to a specific context of use such as | this, then you're working._ | edding4500 wrote: | I wrote a little reply on that[1]. I don't think that a tool is | ever to blame. Sure, some tools suck and can be a source of | distraction. But human beings need tools to capture creativity | and transport them into real life. | | [1]: https://papierplan.de/blog/on-notes-against-notetaking- | syste... | jrm4 wrote: | Yes. Love this. | | Here's the observation I've made in getting lost in these rabbit | holes: | | Remember what the computer is good at vs what the human is good | at. People like us get drawn to systems that try to replicate | what the human is good at, but _we 're so much better that many | of these things are pointless._ | | Specifically, I'm thinking about note-taking systems that, for | example, generate fancy looking dependency graphs. They may have | some use, but your human brains is WAY better at this task of | "making immediate connections between disparate ideas." | greentext wrote: | Don't conflate procrastination with note taking systems. | Heyso wrote: | I take notes of (almost) everything I work on. What links I went | to, screenshot or snippets of relevant information, current | thought. The structure is simple, a folder for the project, and | one .md file per day. | | It helps me think by writing thing down, free brain memory space | and reduces browser tabs number. It gives me an history of what I | tried put earlier to solve my issue. It also give me something to | say if anybody ask what I have been doing these past weeks or | months (employer, recruiter). Finally, if I ever get a similar | bug, I have a good chance to find some help from my past self | with ctrl-shift-f. I write my notes with webstorm. | bigmattystyles wrote: | I've been using Obsidian for a year or so now. I only take notes | for meetings / planning agendas for meetings ahead of time - I | also have the notes automatically committed to git on the hour. I | actually got inspired to do this by James Comey's well documented | use of contemporaneous notes. I don't know why I'm not important | - in fact, what I need to look for in obsidian is the concept of | having notes `expire` after a bit. In anycase, all these articles | about note taking are always about how they work (or don't) work | for the individual author of said article. It doesn't mean it's | the right solution for you. Take what does work for you and | abandon the rest without giving it a second thought. This comment | included. | meltyness wrote: | As an avid Obsidian fan, and donor: | | #Wednesday #BeforeAHoliday | fredgrott wrote: | Yet we hear stories of famous music stars using said note taking | systems and touting such things as the reason for their success | in song Writing, from my generation Steve Tyler for example. | WJW wrote: | Without a count of how many aspiring songwriters used the note | taking systems but did not make it, that is likely just | survivorship bias. Based on this single data point there is no | way to distinguish between whether Steve Tyler succeeded due to | talent, due to how hard he worked, due to luck or due to his | note taking system. | dboreham wrote: | Also Seinfeld. | ChildOfChaos wrote: | Not sure exactly what you are referring too, but just a | little Anecdote about something else that the internet seems | to love about 'Seinfeld' | | The Seinfeld technique, basically doing something every day | and then marking an X on the calendar, this is apparently | what Seinfeld used to become such a big star, if you google | it, you will find thousands of articles about it and | productivity YouTubers talking about it. | | Even James clear one of the most popular authors in the field | references it massively in his best selling book Atomic | Habits. | | Except that isn't the case. It's nonsense. When asked about | it Seinfeld himself, barely remembered it, it wasn't | something he did, it was just an off-the-chuff remark he gave | to someone asking about how to get into comedy once, not his | magic secret formula that the internet seems to think it is. | dctoedt wrote: | > * just a little antidote about something else that the | internet seems to love about 'Seinfeld'* | | Nit: Anecdote, not antidote. | ChildOfChaos wrote: | Thanks, I always get words wrong when I am tired / | spacey. | deckard1 wrote: | yep. It's curious how it was attached to his name. Maybe a | bit of the Mandela Effect going on. | | Regardless, I can personally vouch for the method. It's so | stupid but it worked for me. Draw a grid on a piece of | paper. Mark an X on the next available square every time | you do the thing you want to do (i.e. create a habit for). | And there is exactly one rule: Do not ever break the chain. | Ever. Don't do it you stupid dumbass! Not even one day. No | cheat days. Nothing. | | The psychological or chemical reward for marking that | stupid X seems to be enough to motivate you to change | behavior. Might be because this method is so simple it's | fool-proof. It's one rule. You can't rationalize your wait | out of it. | larrywright wrote: | I use an app called Streaks on my phone to do this. It's | a powerful motivator for whatever reason. | Apocryphon wrote: | > -It's not that I advocate for no note-taking. I just strongly | believe in keeping it as elementary as possible, such that the | note-taking itself doesn't become the thrust of the endeavor. | Leonardo da Vinci kept all of his notes in one big book. If he | liked something he put it down. This is known as a | _commonplace_ book, and it is about how detailed your note- | taking system should be unless you plan on thinking more | elaborately than Leonardo da Vinci. Taping a bunch of cryptic | phrases to the walls is also acceptable, or keeping a shoebox | full of striking phrases on a jumble of papers, as Eminem did. | Silverback_VII wrote: | I not sure if the brain is really able to distinguish between | what is important and what is not in a world where there is heavy | competition to hijack people's brains. | jerf wrote: | I mostly endorse this, but as I recently wrote in reply to | something else [1], I also have found great value in writing | things down to get them out of my head. In that case I was more | talking about blog-post type things, but it includes notes for | work and such. | | So what I sometimes do is a hybrid model: I take the notes, thus | satisfying my brain that the thing is no longer something it | needs to chew on... and then basically discard the notes. Not | quite literally, I don't literally chuck them in the trash. I | might keep them around for a while in case I do need something | out of them. But they don't contribute to my "to do" list, | metaphorical or literal, much at all. | | Yes. Every once in a long while, something falls through the | cracks that I should have picked up. But the reality is that _for | me_ , YMMV, this approach is a huge net positive. I am able to | constantly re-evaluate what's important right now without a lot | of mental baggage, and usually, when I'm in the moment deciding | what's important in this moment, I'm _vastly_ more accurate in my | assessment than I would have been trying to prognosticate a month | ago. | | [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32984424 | munificent wrote: | I believe the author would agree fully with this model. They | aren't against writing as thinking, they're against focusing on | your note-taking system _as a meaningful artifact in itself_. | And especially against it as an elaborate distracting one. | jerf wrote: | Agreed; I consider it an elaboration on what personally works | for me, not disagreement. | sailorganymede wrote: | I fully agree with this article and that's why I have a note | taking system. I recognise I have my best ideas spontaneously but | a solid note taking system is what helps me pull specific details | of what I am trying to do from my past experiences. That being | said, it took tons of time before I settled on something that | worked for me and I could say: No more optimising. Work time, | let's go. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-10-05 23:00 UTC)