[HN Gopher] "Skimpflation" is hitting everything from food to ho... ___________________________________________________________________ "Skimpflation" is hitting everything from food to hotels Author : prostoalex Score : 33 points Date : 2022-10-05 21:25 UTC (1 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.cbsnews.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.cbsnews.com) | Overtonwindow wrote: | I remember when Hershey changed the recipe for Reese's Cups, | removing palm oil, and other ingredients which made it less of an | oily peanut butter, and more dry and cake like. I understand | (now) the palm oil concern, but boy did it really change the | texture and taste. | nsxwolf wrote: | Oreos getting rid of lard was a staggering change. Then | partially hydrogenated vegetable oils got the boot, and | whatever they started using in Oreos after that was absolutely | vile. They've improved somewhat in the last few years, but they | are not really Oreos. | zinckiwi wrote: | _(sings)_ My sweet lard (...hallelujah) | LaserDiscMan wrote: | I don't have soda (or sweet food) very often, but I do miss the | taste (and rush) of real sugar. I've never tasted a | reformulated product that comes close to the real thing. | t-writescode wrote: | And yet Arizona Ice Tea still has an MSRP of 99c | uoaei wrote: | The "S" in "MSRP" means that in practice you are paying more | than that, due to inflated prices from the "R" who is selling. | jdpedrie wrote: | Arizona prints the price on the cans to discourage that. In | my experience, that has worked. | imgabe wrote: | > One recent example of skimpflation that consumers did notice | involved Conagra's Smart Balance spread, a dairy-free butter | substitute. Conagra recently changed its formulation to reduce | its share of vegetable oil from 64% to 39% -- an almost 40% | reduction in vegetable oil. | | Ugh, nobody should be eating congealed vegetable oil in the first | place. One more advantage of eating real food like butter is that | they can't replace the ingredients with something else when it's | just one ingredient. | sneak wrote: | Not all milk is of equal quality. Corners can be cut even with | a single ingredient. | imgabe wrote: | The minimum quality milk is still better than vegetable oil | or whatever industrial byproduct they're substituting for | vegetable oil. | sph wrote: | The question is what do you replace vegetable oil in dairy free | """butter""" with. Sawdust? Spent motor grease? | throwaway699769 wrote: | Aaronstotle wrote: | If someone is vegan, telling them to eat butter instead is not | much help. | | (Source: dating a vegan and try to convince them to eat butter | on a daily basis) | imgabe wrote: | Olive oil would probably be a better vegan substitute for | anywhere you would use butter. Although that can suffer from | the same substitution problems. | TheSpiceIsLife wrote: | Why would you do that? Don't you like who they are? | dpeck wrote: | Along with skimpflation in sizes, keep a look out for it in | things like legally protected terms. For instance ice cream has | to have a certain level of milk fat to be legally called "ice | cream", if they aren't it'll be called something like "frozen | dairy dessert". | jabbany wrote: | Huh.. that must explain why I've been seeing a lot of brands | switching to the term "frozen yogurt" for what is essentially | cheap "ice cream" (=> tastes nothing like actual frozen | yogurt...). | | > Unlike yogurt, frozen yogurt is not regulated by the U.S. | Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (wikipedia) | josho wrote: | This is a good test. If we truly are a capitalist economy then | we'll see competition enter and new products that sell quality | offerings. | | My prediction is that won't happen. There's been too much | consolidation and efficiencies through scale that it's impossible | for a company to get founded to sell a toilet paper that's not | 20% thinner or any of the other examples mentioned. | | On the upside at least companies are cheating us out of our money | only and no longer selling us products that will kill us due to | safety or poisoning issues. That's progress. | imgabe wrote: | The market has to value quality offerings enough to pay for it. | There are already more people expensive quality options, but | most people prefer cheaper but good enough. | s1artibartfast wrote: | The quality products already exist, I'm guessing you aren't | buying them because you want a cheaper option. | jpdaigle wrote: | Some product categories seem to have the middle of the market | (quality wise) hollow out and disappear, so all you've got | left is the low-end crap and high-end pricy versions, with no | middle-range left. | | One example: try to buy a nice metal or leather band for an | Apple Watch. There's the low-end ones, which are 4$ on | alibaba re-sold on Amazon for 12$. There's the X00$ Apple- | made first party ones, and that's it. Nobody's making a | really nice ~45$ leather band without the Apple name (that's | obviously not just the cheap alibaba ones with a better | marketing site). | mlrtime wrote: | The worst part of Hotels are the additional Resort or Facility | fees on top of room charges for features like wifi or a pool. | | I'm surprised we aren't seeing hotels where the resort fee is | more than the nightly fee yet, like the old .01$ + 10$ shipping | on ebay. | lostgame wrote: | My girlfriend and I would love that. We love to travel, but | rarely have the time to use things like pools unless we've | specifically rented a room with a double jacuzzi. (If you | haven't done this, and have a partner; please do. I guarantee | it'll make your lives while it's around.) | | If we didn't have to _pay_ for a pool we'd never use (we don't | even pack bathing suits) that would be fantastic. | zaphod12 wrote: | Oh you think resort fees are optional? That would make sense. | No no, they're tacked onto every bill. | rconti wrote: | Oh ye of much optimism. The resort fees are typically not | optional. | kaikai wrote: | Unfortunately that's not how the fees work. You get charged | for them whether you use them or not. | babyshake wrote: | Or the $50 daily valet fee. And don't forget the gratuitous | tips expected when dropping off, picking up, or needing to get | something from your vehicle. | Magi604 wrote: | I tend to hoard food and will consume it on a "first in last out" | basis so I'm constantly rotating stock and nothing expires before | being consumed. | | One day I noticed that the bag of mixed nuts I just bought was | labelled 50g less than a bag I had purchased a few months ago. It | wasn't the case that there were less nuts in the bag. The bag | itself was smaller so as to maintain the appearance of | robustness. | | What struck me is that this probably wasn't in response to any | sort of supply or demand shock, but was probably already planned | since the product was first introduced. The way the design on the | package was already reconfigured and then the package distributed | to factories to be filled with the new amount, the producers knew | and planned beforehand that it would happen, number crunched and | everything. | | So now I already internally think to myself that any consumable | product that screams great value will inevitably fall victim to | skimpflation, because it was planned from the start. Make an | awesome product, get people hooked on it, and then slowly ratchet | back the value to reap the gains. And of course hope people don't | notice. | amelius wrote: | I don't mind smaller sizes. In fact, I prefer them, because I | usually eat the entire package regardless of its size. | | Of course, I _do_ mind skimpflation, i.e., the reduction in | quality. | willcipriano wrote: | This pattern with happening with tools. Milwaukee released a | impact driver and it received great reviews, they were | practically indestructible. They just released a revision of | it, same model number and packaging but completely changed the | inside and now you can't even change a set of tires with one | before it dies. | | https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iusVoa21daQ | jacknews wrote: | We've been having 'skimpflation' or 'crapiflation' for decades. | | The hedonic adjustment in the inflation figures accounts for eg | washing machines getting relatively cheaper. But it doesn't | account for the fact they've also been getting crappier and | shorter-lived. | thewebcount wrote: | Oh man, the Smart Balance debacle was real! My spouse and I | noticed that it doesn't melt anymore. We thought we were going | crazy, until we read about it elsewhere. Suffice to say we've | switched away from it now and won't be going back. What a dumb | move by the manufacturer. | googlryas wrote: | They claim it is to make it more spreadable. I guess it is just | a coincidence that it cuts their cost of ingredients by about | 50%, since they only thing they replaced it with was water. | hayst4ck wrote: | I would really like to see a nutrition label for manufactured | goods, including what countries parts come from. In particular I | would love to see semantic versioning applied to manufactured | products so it's easier to see when products change. | Tao3300 wrote: | The versioning is a good idea. I feel like we have the right to | know when something has changed. | | As much as I want to know how much of what I'm eating is lead | and sawdust from Elbonia, it sounds like it would be tricky to | implement. Lots of constituent parts with mixed origins. | Where's the maltodextrin from? The factories it was processed | in? The countries where the grain came from? The place it was | all packaged? We get into "nobody knows how to make a pencil" | territory pretty fast. Though I like the spirit of the idea. | Natsu wrote: | Even with non-manufactured goods, I wonder how the nutrition in | things like broccoli change over time. I remember hearing | somewhere that some of the nutrients had gone down due to | changes in farming practice, but I don't think I've seen much | evidence that anyone is even tracking this. | jabbany wrote: | Ok.. the larger point about "inflation beyond just prices" is | well understood but... why do people keep coining more and more | new terms for this? | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shrinkflation | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shrinkflation#Skimpflation | antiterra wrote: | If they can't keep the price low then a lot of consumers will go | for cheaper/lower quality goods anyway, | | Even for high-end enthusiast items, consumer sensitivity to price | is pretty high. Just look at how bitter people have been about | the NVidia RTX 4 series GPUs. | | I know someone who buys groceries from Target because it's | significantly cheaper than other grocery stores in their area. | This seems due to Target still implementing a kind of national | pricing. Possible unexciting arbitrage opportunity there, I | suppose? | scythe wrote: | It's funny being able to do mental arithmetic. I instinctively | calculate the price per weight of almost every food product I | buy, then I have to remind myself that most people don't do that. | le-mark wrote: | Non intuitively (to me at least) this somewhat explains the | proliferation of the dollar stores. These stores sell name brand | products packaged in small quantities at a relatively low price, | but high margin. Making each location much more profitable than | the big box stores. Especially since each location typically only | has one or two employees on duty most of the time. | noipv4 wrote: | Tesla is removing Ultrasound distance sensors from Model 3 and Y | https://www.theverge.com/2022/10/5/23388770/tesla-ultrasonic... | sirsinsalot wrote: | The "best by" date on items in UK supermarkets has been | contracting since the first covid lockdown. | | Unless you buy frozen, you can't do the traditional "weekly shop" | anymore unless you want a fridge full of expired food. | | Either the shortage of preservative packaging gasses is in full | swing still or they're doing it to keep people shopping more | regularly while hiking prices. | babyshake wrote: | I'm sure it also makes sense that for the same salary, workers | should be provided fewer hours...right??? | quickthrower2 wrote: | I doubt this is new, probably happening during the low inflation | times too. | nsxwolf wrote: | We've heard about shrinking products for decades. They must | occasionally return to their original sizes, or they'd be | really tiny right now. | | I've also been hearing that Cocoa Puffs are "Now! More | Chocolatey!" at regular intervals my entire life. They must | have not tasted like anything at all when I first ate them in | the 70s. | dunham wrote: | Perhaps it's "more chocolatey" because they replaced the | "chocolate" (which I believe has some regulations around | actually containing cocoa butter) with "chocolatey" (which, | by not claiming to be chocolate, can just be flavoring). | babyshake wrote: | Now featuring 100% chocolate! By which we mean synthetic | flavors provided by "100% Chocolate Incorporated" | ninth_ant wrote: | This is absolutely not a new phenomenon in the slightest, | companies across all industries are always messing with their | products trying to reduce costs when possible. Sometimes it | works, sometimes it doesn't. | | It may be more pronounced in times where consumers are more | price-conscious, as companies try to raise/maintain profits | without avoid raising prices -- hoping that budget minded | consumers will accept this tradeoff more than in extravagant | times. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-10-05 23:00 UTC)