[HN Gopher] The non-linear workdays changing the shape of produc...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The non-linear workdays changing the shape of productivity
        
       Author : mustafabisic1
       Score  : 29 points
       Date   : 2022-10-06 20:02 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.bbc.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.bbc.com)
        
       | bingooooo wrote:
       | A great way to get burned out as work encroaches on every aspect
       | of your life. No thank you.
        
         | maccard wrote:
         | Not necessarily. Ive worked with American companies from the UK
         | for most of my career. A flexible work environment means I can
         | go golfing at 9:30 on a Tuesday morning when it's sunny and my
         | partner is in the office, or I can work a Saturday morning when
         | I want a Monday morning as a swap because I have a concert on
         | the next city over and I won't make the last train home (both
         | of these are examples of what I've done in the last 6 months).
        
         | Ancalagon wrote:
         | Agreed. My gf was recently asked to attend 5am meetings on her
         | thursdays and Fridays. Her stance is a little different than
         | mine, I would've outright refused but she accepted. Her boss
         | said she could go back to sleep right after the meetings but we
         | all know that's not as easy as it sounds
        
         | mattbee wrote:
         | I work exactly as this article describes, but 25 hours per
         | week.
         | 
         | It feels like I am doing the productive 25 hours of a 37 hour
         | work week. I log my hours pretty accurately, which I think
         | makes it a better deal for my employer - no commuting, nothing
         | social, and I'm picking the most productive hours for me. I've
         | also got some freedom to switch between tasks (writing, coding,
         | it's largely only teaching needs me to stick to appointments).
         | 
         | It absolutely feels like work fitting around my life (kids,
         | gym, family visits) rather than the other way round.
         | 
         | I work some (even most) evenings, but only because I like to
         | take bits of the day "off".
         | 
         | I agree this would be a horrible encroaching way to work for an
         | employer who expects tHE exTRa MiLe, but those guys are
         | horrible to work for already.
        
         | leetrout wrote:
         | It depends on what you are doing throughout the day.
         | 
         | I think you are right that people may likely spend more time
         | working in the end.
         | 
         | We are all different, though.
         | 
         | My ideal situation is to do deep work for 4 hours everyday and
         | focus on the marathon not the dash.
        
           | calderwoodra wrote:
           | agreed - for me I prefer to do customer support, meetings and
           | bug fixing in the morning, then deep focus work after 10pm.
        
       | BlargMcLarg wrote:
       | >In decades past, non-linear workdays used to be fairly uncommon.
       | 
       | They still are fairly uncommon. Source: traffic jams.
       | 
       | But for real. There is a trend to be a little more flexible, yet
       | most places in the world continue to require the most obvious
       | candidates for both remote and _asynchronous_ work to function
       | 'hybrid' and synchronously. It's incredibly telling Tuesdays and
       | Thursdays are the days everything ends up jammed here.
       | 
       | If that wasn't enough, the 'we are doing Scrum' movement heavily
       | pushes synchronous stand-ups and other meetings in the morning.
       | Since most places also require video (yuck), good luck trying to
       | just sit at a meeting and then go back to bed. If your ideal is
       | to work the latter half of the day, we're still a far cry from
       | normalizing it. I'd wager you can replace 'Scrum' with something
       | else equally applicable in other disciplines.
       | 
       | Worst part is, we're still forcing the workerbees to fit the 9-5
       | rhythm, but the services are _also_ working on a 9-5 rhythm. So
       | how does Worker Bee use a service only available when they should
       | be working? Not their problem, that 's your problem (no
       | seriously, who designed this structure?)
        
       | someweirdperson wrote:
       | non-contiguous?
        
         | jakzurr wrote:
         | I suppose that'd be anything except five 8-hour blocks of time,
         | one each day of five in a row, always at the same times of day.
        
       | mkl95 wrote:
       | Something that the software industry has to assimilate eventually
       | is that unless your organization is very efficient, there's not a
       | big difference between working for 6 or 10 hours a day.
       | 
       | Scrum / agile / whatever as understood by most companies does not
       | prevent context switching, synchronous work that could be done
       | asynchronously, and interruptions. When added together, those
       | things shrink your team's capacity massively. I'm talking real
       | capacity, not some magical number made up at some meeting.
       | 
       | Work could be relatively linear. The people who can make it
       | happen just don't care or are clueless about it.
        
       | itslennysfault wrote:
       | small but important correction...
       | 
       | > However, when society industrialised, a rigid, five-day,
       | 40-hour workweek arose in factory settings
       | 
       | ummm... no. More like the 6 day 16 hour per day work-week arose
       | in factory settings.
       | 
       | The five-day, 40-hour workweek was fought and died for by the
       | labor movement.
        
         | fritolaid wrote:
         | in tech, we don't really have 40hr/wk. It's more like 80hr/wk.
         | And work on weekends. If you have a position that requires
         | 40hrs/wk or less and no work on weekends whatsoever, consider
         | yourself lucky. I hear stories about colleagues being
         | overworked on continuous basis.
        
           | maccard wrote:
           | And meanwhile I hear stories of people clocking in 40 hour
           | weeks on a continuous basis. The reality is that both exist.
        
           | oakesm9 wrote:
           | I assume this is referring to the US?
           | 
           | I don't know anyone who does much over 40 hours in the UK,
           | let alone anything close to 80 hours. A few might pick up
           | urgent tasks on the weekend, but only when needed and not
           | regularly.
        
           | huile wrote:
        
         | jdminhbg wrote:
         | The 40-hour workweek is the result of massive productivity
         | gains; the labor movement is just a sideshow to the longue
         | duree of progress.
        
           | OkayPhysicist wrote:
           | If the length of our work week followed productivity, the
           | workweek would be at 13 hours today. Your claim is completely
           | and utterly baseless.
        
           | idiotsecant wrote:
           | Productivity gains do not lead to increased worker benefit,
           | they lead to increased owner benefit. Organized labor leads
           | to increased worker benefit.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-10-06 23:00 UTC)