[HN Gopher] Lufthansa bans AirTags in checked luggage ___________________________________________________________________ Lufthansa bans AirTags in checked luggage Author : N19PEDL2 Score : 154 points Date : 2022-10-07 22:07 UTC (52 minutes ago) (HTM) web link (onemileatatime.com) (TXT) w3m dump (onemileatatime.com) | sushid wrote: | This is going to have the opposite of their intended effect. | People are now going to be more interested than ever in AirTags | precisely for luggages thanks to them. | myself248 wrote: | Bingo! It hadn't occurred to me until just now, but you bet | your butt there'll be an Airtag, a Trackr, and a Tile in my | luggage next time. | axlee wrote: | Trackr has been gone since 2021. | Maximus9000 wrote: | Me too. | xcambar wrote: | This is called the Streisand Effect. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect | nixpulvis wrote: | On a related note. Has anyone figured out a way to prevent my | damn AirTags from randomly chiming? It's driving me insane. | O__________O wrote: | Strange idea, instead of finding a way to ban technology that | makes you look bad -- maybe instead be customer friendly, offer | free tags and add clear real-time map of where the customers | luggage is currently and is expected to be. | faangiq wrote: | I eagerly await US carriers adding this as yet another contrived | upsell. | savoytruffle wrote: | You'd expect Spirit Airlines to do this, but do they let you | check a bag for less than a hundred bucks? | eh9 wrote: | I have every incentive to stick a tag in my bag and no incentive | to take it out. | heisenzombie wrote: | " Lufthansa claims that the transmission function needs to be | turned off during flight when in checked luggage, just as is | required for cell phones, laptops, etc." | | On my phone, turning on airplane mode seems to disable the cell | and wifi radios (with wifi able to be toggled back on) but | Bluetooth defaults to staying on. | mft_ wrote: | Indeed; and there's no problem with half of a plane using | Bluetooth headphones during the flight, either. | | I don't think this move by Lufthansa has much to do with | engineering :) | kazinator wrote: | > _it just can't transmit, which of course renders it useless_ | | Because, what, it's impossible to program things like this to | start transmitting after an N-hour radio silence? | savoytruffle wrote: | Do they ban wristwatches with the same battery inside of them!? | hayd wrote: | Apple must fight this and get the regulation clarified. | Ridiculous. | savoytruffle wrote: | Indeed and I expect there's no end of high-level Apple | employees flying SFO -> FRA | [deleted] | kogir wrote: | I was able to determine that someone with the exact same bag had | taken mine from baggage claim and retrieve it from them before | they left the airport with it. We both had much better vacations | as a result. I'm going to keep mine in my luggage, sorry. | dmix wrote: | Why would you stop? I highly doubt they'll invest in the means | to actually stop it across every airport. | Arubis wrote: | Initiate Streisand effect! | keyle wrote: | Isn't it a case of false information? | | I thought the tags communicated with nearby Bluetooth devices | that have gps, which there should be none active nearby lost | luggage... so people would scream that their luggage is somewhere | around while the location is in fact outdated? | landr0id wrote: | Yes, they communicate with nearby Apple devices which have | opted in to being part of the AirTag discovery network. | zwily wrote: | Chances are, there is someone around. An airline worker with an | iPhone in their pocket, etc. I've put AirTags in my luggage | since they came out and it's fun to see how often their | location gets pinged. | null0pointer wrote: | Airtags are great for tracking luggage. Last time I travelled I | put one in both of my checked bags and was able to track them as | they moved around the airport and onto the plane. My phone in the | passenger cabin was even able to receive pings from them during | the flight when the bags were in the cargo hold. I have had my | luggage lost before and Airtags give me great peace of mind that | my luggage is headed to the destination and that if my bags do | get lost I can hopefully help direct the airline staff to exactly | where they are. I've never flown Lufthansa but this ban wouldn't | stop me anyway. The benefit is too great. | nostrademons wrote: | Note that the reason for airport mode is a courtesy to cell-phone | carriers. It's not any air safety issue. Rather, 300-500 cell | phones all trying to contact the next cell tower, multiple times | per minute, would wreak havoc on cell service. | | https://www.inverse.com/article/51015-cell-phone-use-on-airp... | | At one point, when both cell phones and laptops were new, there | was perhaps a risk to the airplane's electronics. Modern cell | phones have been steadily tuned to reduce interference with other | electronics though - good thing, otherwise you couldn't use them | in a modern home with its dozens of connected devices. And modern | avionics have been shielded to protect them from outside | electronic interference - also a good thing, otherwise the next | terrorist could simply turn their laptop on. The ban on | electronic transmission is one of those regulations that was a | response to technology at a particular point in time but now is | largely vestigial. You can tell because it's rarely enforced, and | yet bad things do not occur just because you forgot to turn your | phone to airplane mode. | uh_uh wrote: | You are not required to put airplane mode on inside the airport | (unless you are on the plane already), so this cell tower | explanation doesn't make sense to me. | alexnewman wrote: | luckily this happens all the time since people often forget. i | know i do. | sigwinch28 wrote: | > Note that the reason for airport mode is a courtesy to cell- | phone carriers. | | This doesn't track. What about trains? | joecot wrote: | Trains move significantly slower than planes. They're also on | the ground, mostly below the towers, while planes are in the | air, moving very fast, with multiple towers in line of sight. | scandinavian wrote: | It doesn't track in any way. In the airport there's small | cells or femtocells by the operators. In the air, the only | cells you can reach are the one pointing upwards. | | Also, they don't really ask for airplane mode anymore, at | least not when I'm flying. | ghaff wrote: | Huh. I don't check luggage much and, at least with United, their | checked baggage app tracking system seems pretty good. But I've | been tossing in an AirTag on the few occasions I've checked | luggage in the past year or so and it seems to work pretty well | as a backup tracker. | mintplant wrote: | I check luggage pretty often, and these days I always chuck a | Tile into every bag. With all the logistical disruptions at | airports of late, waiting at baggage claim is a lot less nerve- | wracking when I can see that my bags pinged on the tarmac five | minutes ago. | ghaff wrote: | It's not perfect information but in a lost/delayed/slow | baggage situation, anything is better than nothing. | 762236 wrote: | We just bought our first AirTag specifically for this reason. | harha wrote: | This is exactly why I'm so opposed to government bail outs - even | though it was repaid in most countries (famously Austria chose | the worst way to save them, give them free money to not repay). | | It would have been nice to see this massive company (with | monopoly on many routes in Germany) broken up and under new | ownership competing for customers, rather than treating them as a | massive burden. | robg wrote: | Good luck enforcing this ban. How would they? Open up suspect | bags and tear them apart looking for a device the size of a | quarter? | mkonecny wrote: | These devices beacon every few seconds to announce their | location. | runjake wrote: | AirTags are scannable as an NFC and they identify themselves as | AirTag. | ceejayoz wrote: | NFC range is so low you'd have to scan the exact right spot | in the bag. Good luck. | exitb wrote: | You'd have to admit to breaking this rule in order to point out | any baggage misplacement. | mccorrinall wrote: | I have an AirTag which turns off during flights and powers | itself on after 24h. Hah. Compliance! | scottmcdot wrote: | How do you get the AirTag to do this? | dogsboywonder wrote: | I would say the push for this is motivated by their crappy | customer service. | tonywastaken wrote: | I agree with this. Mostly because I had a poor experience with | one of their gate agents recently. They forced me to check my | hand luggage because it was 2kg overweight. They don't | uniformly enforce the hand luggage weight limit, their | employees get to pick and choose passengers at the gate. The | gate agent scoffed at me putting an AirTag in the bag that they | were making me check. | Kaibeezy wrote: | > _They don't uniformly enforce..._ | | Because it's a scam. They pick "enforcement" targets by | guessing who seems likely to pay. | | I've _never_ been charged when traveling solo. But with | family or co-workers they have a shot at the "oh, just pay | it, we have a plane to catch" gambit. I know their tricks and | _always_ refuse. Then I lay the bag down and start rifling | through it like Yoda in Luke's lunchbox. | | The long line of passengers who think they will miss their | flight are staring daggers at me. My travel companions are | attempting to activate their invisibility cloaks. I give not | one f because _it is a scam._ | | I am helping everyone by showing it is a scam. Half the time | the agent backs down. The other times I can usually throw a | few heavier things into a spare duffel bag. F that s. | TazeTSchnitzel wrote: | There could be non-cynical motives for airlines not to want | customers to be able to track their baggage. Getting weird | enquiries about whether bags have been stolen because they are in | some unexpected non-airport location, when it's just a place the | airline uses to handle delayed baggage, is probably troublesome | for them. | BoorishBears wrote: | Delta has been providing live updates of luggage locations for | years without an issue. | | They're claiming it's due to radio transmission anyways. | myself248 wrote: | Is it just me or is that even more cynical? | | Moving my belongings to an off-site location is _precisely_ the | sort of thing I'd want to be notified of, and if the airline | doesn't feel that I deserve to know that, ahh, well. That would | be problematic. | | I appreciate that you're trying to find alternate explanations, | and it's my first impulse to do the same, but I've been racking | my brain and I just can't come up with any. This one isn't | better, it's worse. | ghaff wrote: | It doesn't seem as if "We've rerouted your luggage to a | different airport and you'll get it at some point" should be a | particular secret of the airline. | [deleted] | ninth_ant wrote: | Is it really a "weird inquiry" for someone to wonder why their | bags aren't being delivered? | | If the bags aren't being delivered, that's troublesome for the | owner of the bags. And a version of "troublesome" I find more | sympathy for compared to the burden on poor ol' massive airline | companies having to listen to their customers when they lose | their property. | awillen wrote: | Yeah, but the solution to this is to proactively communicate | the status of bags to customers. If you're getting weird | inquiries because you're being opaque about something important | to a customer, who is confused, it's your own fault if that's | troublesome. | andy_ppp wrote: | It's almost as if Lufthansa are admitting they are a terrible | airline with awful practices like silently cancelling the return | leg of flights if you don't make the outbound. This happened to | me on the way back from Germany, I can't imagine they still do | this but I found them extremely unhelpful and this sort of | behaviour reinforces my feeling they think you're lucky to be | travelling with them. | biggc wrote: | > like silently cancelling the return leg of flights if you | don't make the outbound | | I don't know about the "silently" part, but this is standard | practice for most (all?) airlines. | andy_ppp wrote: | It's immoral and illegal in Europe but sure quite a few | airlines still try this on. | jupp0r wrote: | Many airlines do this. Lufthansa did it to me last year. They | are usually accommodating if you ask in advance (mine was due | to a connecting flight being canceled and driving the last leg | was much faster than waiting for the next flight). | andy_ppp wrote: | It's actually illegal for them to do this without refunding | you in Europe but a lot of airlines just ignore the law on | this it seems. | nomilk wrote: | > This is specifically because of the transmission function. | Lufthansa claims that the transmission function needs to be | turned off during flight when in checked luggage, just as is | required for cell phones, laptops, etc. | | Can anyone confirm/deny whether Airtags can interfere with | aircraft navigation and communication systems? | Ancalagon wrote: | No more plausible deniability I guess when really you just don't | want to pay someone to sort through the lost and found luggage. | ddingus wrote: | [Banned] | | [After shocked expression] | | "I had no idea" | nalaz wrote: | And how do they intend to enforce this? | icey wrote: | At the least this gives them some poor counterargument if | someone says they were able to track their lost bag with an | Airtag. | | "What do you mean, you have an Airtag in your bag? We don't | have any guarantees for baggage containing banned materials." | Tomdarkness wrote: | How are they even going to know if there is an airtag in | someone's luggage? Are they particularly obvious on an x-ray or | is there some kind of specialised detector? | savoytruffle wrote: | It's an interesting question. Maybe it's just scare tactics. | The battery that goes in an AirTag is the same as in a lot of | wristwatches and I expect it would look like a wristwatch via | x-ray. And it is exactly as dangerous as such a thing, which it | to say: not. | OJFord wrote: | See the comment about non-cynical motives - and then, you can't | complain 'well I can see on my tracker app that..' if you're | not supposed to have one. | thayne wrote: | Well, if they are transmitting, at least in theory it would be | possible to detect that transmission. Though I would be kind of | surprised if they actually put much effort into actually | enforcing it. | SomeBoolshit wrote: | But then why is inflight wifi a thing? | sokoloff wrote: | Under FAA rules (what I'm familiar with), the air carrier | can determine which portable electronic devices to allow. | | The law (it's short): | https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/91.21 | | An advisory relating to it: https://www.faa.gov/documentLib | rary/media/Advisory_Circular/... | | This allows an air carrier to approve anything they're | confident won't cause an issue but not approve AirTags. | savoytruffle wrote: | If they want to defeat tracking, they can enforce their | baggage employees not to bring iPhones to work. Of course | eventually on the plane, the luggage will be like ten feet | below hundreds of people who might have an iPhone! | jupp0r wrote: | Any idea how this would be enforced? | insane_dreamer wrote: | Are they going to scan bags for AirTags now? | [deleted] | bilekas wrote: | > This is specifically because of the transmission function. | Lufthansa claims that the transmission function needs to be | turned off during flight when in checked luggage, just as is | required for cell phones, laptops, etc. | | While this is negligible and I can see a lot of people saying | "Well who cares it's just one" if you imagine a lot of | interference from a lot of baggage with them on a flight.. I | haven't tested, but personally I would prefer to be safer rather | than sorry. | | It's also worth noting this is a de-facto rule for US domestic | flights too. All carriers, switching to airplane mode is a | federal requirement on U.S. domestic flights. | | Edit : I found an article saying they were compliant with US but | no sources.. https://thepointsguy.com/news/bag-tracking-apple- | airtag/ | dghlsakjg wrote: | AFAIK you are still allowed to use Bluetooth and wifi in all | phases of flight which is what the AirTag uses (ble). | | If you aren't then someone should tell United because I stayed | connected to their network watching a movie all the way from | cruise altitude to the gate. | bilekas wrote: | That's fair enough I guess. In the case of bluetooth I don't | see an issue. | imglorp wrote: | These things are bluetooth at only 2.8 mw UWB in the GHz | range[1]. Anything with that power at that band in an aluminum | walled cargo hold is probably nil: kitchen foil attenuates 80 | dB over 100 Mhz [2] and bulkheads are much thicker. | | So yeah it's not for technical reasons. | | 1. https://fccid.io/BCGA2187 | | 2. http://www.aluminium-foil.org/aluminum-foil-for- | electromagne... | aliqot wrote: | I wonder if cargo bays could have a mesh or paint that would | act as a faraday cage. | bilekas wrote: | Well the fuselage does already, but the cargo bays are a | faraday in a faraday ? | aliqot wrote: | That's what I'd assumed, but I'm trying to use the most | charitable interpretation of what their concern might be. I | don't think it's an EM issue -at all-. I think it may be an | accountability issue and the inconvenience of having to fly | back individual parcels for no added profit in the face of | proof. | bilekas wrote: | Processing it a bit more, particularly on the blutooth | only 'mode' I think they are just creating a backup | defense for luggage logistic nightmares. | BostonEnginerd wrote: | It's not reasonable to implement something like that. Any gap | would need to be <0.5cm in size in order for it to work on a | 2.4GHz Bluetooth signal. | | Considering that half of the passengers are likely forgetting | to put their device in airplane mode - and they're all using | Bluetooth headphones, there is effectively zero risk to the | airplane. | ghaff wrote: | >All carriers, switching to airplane mode is a federal | requirement on U.S. domestic flights. | | How many people do you think actually do this. (I mostly do, | when I remember.) | | If it's actually a problem, the FAA would be dealing with it | other than hoping passengers individually pressed all the right | buttons. | bilekas wrote: | > How many people do you think actually do this. (I mostly | do, when I remember.) I'm EU based and not flying every day | but any flight at all it's always in airplane mode. It's like | a seatbelt on a car for me, it's just done. | | I'm biased but I would like to believe most people remember, | yamtaddle wrote: | I'd be a little surprised if 50% of cell phone owners even | know _how_ to turn on Airplane Mode. | | Yes, I know it's usually right there on a screen _you 'd | think_ they'd look at pretty often. | | I stand by that. | | Beyond that, several on every flight who might do it, will | forget to, and several more just don't give a fuck. Despite | this I've never once seen anyone get hassled over it. | ghaff wrote: | How would attendants even _know_ to hassle someone. Yes, | there are some people who pay attention to the announcement | and some others who want to preserve their battery. But, | yeah, I 'm guessing well south of 50% turn on airline mode | at least in the US--and I'd probably be a bit surprised if | Europe were that different. Certainly no one makes a show | of caring all that much these days as they did when turning | off cellphones was such a big deal at takeoff. | diebeforei485 wrote: | I don't want my luggage to be sent to some lost luggage auction. | I actually do want to know where it is. | toss1 wrote: | A forward-thinking airline would not ban airtags and the like -- | they would _REQUIRE_ them. Then offload some of the tracking to | the customers. | | This is obviously simply the airline trying to cut down on bad | social media posts, as it is a lot less dramatic to post "I flew | from Frankfurt to New York, and two days later where is my bag?" | instead of "I flew from Frankfurt to New York, and two days later | why is my bag in Hong Kong? | | And with the ban, what are they going to do, refuse to load any | bag that scans as an NFC? Send it but charge extra to collect it? | Kick you off the plane? What happens when you have other luggage | items that require it? | | It also seems like this could be easily defeated with a feature | that would put the AirTag to sleep for X hours after put in the | luggage (set X to long enough to get to the airport and in the | air, but shorter than when you are supposed to arrive). | phit_ wrote: | what a joke, I guess that's one way to deal with their terrible | luggage handling.. I've been now waiting since a flight on August | 20th to receive my "lost" luggage from them. I guess policy like | this is easier than fixing the actual issue. | | The only update I've gotten is this email two weeks ago, their | hotline and website are completely useless. Via DeepL | | > Good day, | | > We apologize that you have not yet received your luggage and | for the inconvenience this has caused. We regret that we are | currently unable to meet our standards for a smooth travel | experience. | | > Why are there delays? | | > There are currently massive logistical and personnel failures | and bottlenecks worldwide, which are delaying baggage handling in | particular. The world of flying is highly interconnected. We are | dependent on our global partners here and are thus confronted | with numerous challenges. | | > We are working hard to ensure that all delayed baggage is | delivered within the coming weeks. | | > If you would like to check the baggage status yourself, please | use the baggage status page only. Our telephone service centers | will not be able to assist with any questions regarding your | baggage. | | > Kind regards | | > Your Lufthansa Team | cm2187 wrote: | Not sure what would be the motive for the airline to hide that | the bag is lost. If it's not waiting for you at the baggage | claim, you know it is lost, airtag or no airtag. Also not sure | what good it does to the user either, to know in which particular | hall of which particular terminal the luggage is right now. | | Much more useful outside of airports. | dghlsakjg wrote: | The cat is out of the bag. | | There is no way that people are going to stop putting AirTags in | their luggage, at least not while airlines are still constantly | losing luggage and fighting people on reimbursement. | aliqot wrote: | I do see how they'd find it bothersome. Imagine what it must be | like that the situation before was: "Oh no my baggage is lost!" | "Oooh that's rough! We'll let ya know!" then nothing. | | Where now what it might be like is: "Oh no my baggage is lost | at XYZ airport at your terminal" and that accountability is | somewhat forced now because they can't just say it wasn't found | or it is 'in transit' when it really isn't. | FredPret wrote: | So inconvenient for them to do what they were contracted to | do: fly you and your luggage from A to B. Can't they just get | free money? | aliqot wrote: | You can get money for your troubles if your flight or | luggage is delayed. For luggage being lost the maximum | liability is $3,800 for domestic flights and about $1,800 | for international flights | | https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/19/what-travelers-need-to- | know-... | harha wrote: | In theory yes, but in practice it could easily cost you | more to deal with the airline and it might well be that | you don't have the receipts anymore. | | With another European airline I recently waited exactly | one day less than the three weeks required for them to | deliver a child seat. That's almost three weeks of not | having one to safely transport my child, no support or | compensation. Since I was returning to my country of | residence the credit card company also didn't refund. | twelvechairs wrote: | Every job, every person, every industry mistakes happen. | You can minimise them with better systems but its never | going to disappear | yamtaddle wrote: | The ones that don't suck are _happy_ if you can help them | fix their error, though. | [deleted] | [deleted] | polynomial wrote: | Don't bother us, we're trying to help you. | rowanG077 wrote: | My heart breaks for them. They have to do the job they should | have been doing in the first place. | rconti wrote: | I get that it's inconvenient and could be used nefariously. I'm | not sure what kinds of worker protections airline staff have in | Europe, but I can see why it might be problematic that I'm | tracking the employee as they drive their van full of lost | luggage to my hotel. | | Still, it's my stuff, so I'm going to keep putting AirTags in | every bag I travel with. I'm sorry, but.. what are they going | to do? Ban me from the airline? | svnpenn wrote: | > I'm sorry, but.. what are they going to do? Ban me from the | airline? | | Um, yeah. | | why do you think that you're special, and that you can | blatantly ignore the rules? I don't agree with the rule, but | if you brazenly ignore it, and they catch you, they have | every right to ban you from future flights. Just look at what | they did with the mask people who started trouble. Bam, | permaban from flights. You wanna push your luck go ahead, but | don't cry if it happens to you. | KerrAvon wrote: | Look at the actual cases, though. You had to be really | aggro to get the permaban instead of just getting walked | off the flight with a warning. IMHO, they were not | aggressive enough. | yreg wrote: | They cannot ban all of us. | svnpenn wrote: | yeah, they really can. Flights are a sellers market, they | run near empty flights often. Plus less people are using | AirTags than you think. | | Again, I think its a dumb rule. But don't think you are | special and can just ignore it forever with no | consequences. | [deleted] | chrisseaton wrote: | > at least not while airlines are still constantly losing | luggage | | Does that actually happen to people still? I thought it was | just a 90s meme. I get a push notification every time they move | my bag anywhere. 'Accepted into the system', 'loaded onto the | plane', 'unloaded off the plane', 'popped out at the carousel'. | Seems pretty bullet proof these days. | dghlsakjg wrote: | American Airlines self-reported a baggage mishandling rate | just short of 1% this year. That seems really high to be | honest. | aaaaaaaaaaab wrote: | https://news.sky.com/story/heathrow-asks-airlines-to- | cancel-... | duxup wrote: | My bags have air tags in them... just by default when I travel. | | My kids are tagged when traveling. Elderly in laws at times. | | This rule makes them look like they know they're terrible/ don't | want to get caught. | nortlov wrote: | If transmissions truly are a problem, I would hope they'd protect | passengers and vehicles (e.g. faraday cage luggage compartments) | rather than hoping customers do not leave dangerous devices such | as AirTags in their luggage. | PLenz wrote: | Next headline: Lufthansasa installs faraday cages in all their | cargo holds | hangonhn wrote: | TBH, that seems the more reasonable way of dealing with it. If | they are truly worried about transmissions while in flight, | then yeah do that. Once the luggage is on the ground and | unloaded the AirTags will still work. Seems like a win win for | everyone -- if what they say about in flight transmissions is | the real reason. | andy_ppp wrote: | They are just tired of people with lost luggage making their | staff go find it... there is absolutely zero risk, the amount | of energy involved is minuscule. | runjake wrote: | For all the people commenting "How would they know?", AirTags are | scannable by NFC readers and identify themselves as an AirTag. | | You can test this yourself by downloading the NFC Tools app on | your iPhone (or one for Android) and doing a read on the AirTag. | | https://apps.apple.com/us/app/nfc-tools/id1252962749 | coder543 wrote: | NFC has a range of around 5cm and has nothing to do with how | AirTags work for tracking purposes. Do you really think AirTags | only update their location when someone with an iPhone comes | over to intentionally scan it? | | Even if you bury the AirTag in the middle of the luggage, it | will still be trackable, but NFC will absolutely not come even | close to reaching it. | | They're not going to have off the shelf equipment capable of | locating an AirTag quickly enough to matter even if they can | tell there are AirTags _somewhere_ in the general vicinity of | the luggage area. That's just not how any of this works. | | Whether the rule itself is ridiculous or not, as others have | pointed out, the main benefit seems to be that they can tell | customers to stop bothering them about luggage that they've | lost. | smoldesu wrote: | Or they could just notice the battery sitting in your bag when | you scan it. Hell, it's probably automated in the same way they | check for firearms or other paraphernalia. | googlryas wrote: | I put an airtag on the inside pocket of my luggage, and am | having no luck scanning it from the outside. It seems unlikely | this will work. I can still find it with my iphone though. | insane_dreamer wrote: | Yeah but security scanners don't have NFC readers built into | them, and even if they did, the range is too short to be useful | the way scanners are built. | Gigachad wrote: | If you stick it in the middle, it's out of range. Unless you | have some super powered scanner perhaps | [deleted] | antman wrote: | If it is not connectable you won't locate your luggage either | fritolaid wrote: | I did not expect anyone on HN suggesting sticking it deep | into the luggage so it's out of range. | yreg wrote: | And you are confidently wrong since the NFC has very | short range. | ceejayoz wrote: | They report in via Bluetooth, not NFC. | | My phone won't scan one from more than a few inches, but I | can locate them with Find My iPhone 20+ feet off. | swyx wrote: | if its out of range, its not much use as an airtag. circular | logic | ceejayoz wrote: | NFC and Bluetooth have different ranges. AirTags use both | for different purposes. | runjake wrote: | It still beacons. And sticking it in the middle will | attenuate the beaconing by quite a bit (per my own testing), | which defeats the purpose. | robswc wrote: | Wow... AirTags on your luggage? What an incredible idea, lol. | | Really though... can someone who knows what they're talking about | (or a pilot?) tell us if the transmitting excuse is a cover or | BS? | kylehotchkiss wrote: | Next AirTag software update: when any nearby phones indicate they | are in Airplane mode via Bluetooth (which they can do because | bluetooth isn't blocked in airplane mode), put all nearby airtags | on standby for an hour). Apple can figure out all the nuances. Or | they'll add cheap pressure monitors and determine tag is on an | airplane. Repeat. Your move, Lufthansa. | jasonpeacock wrote: | An airline that actually cared about customers would figure out a | way to temporarily provide all bags with an Airtag (or | equivalent) and encourage customers to track their bags. | | Or at least, encourage customers to provide their own Airtags. | jupp0r wrote: | I just ordered AirTags for exactly this purpose. Thanks for the | hint Lufthansa. | forrestthewoods wrote: | Need the ability to program them to not transmit for X hours. | Problem solved. | savoytruffle wrote: | Well, also a GPS receiver to detect flights to or from Germany. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-10-07 23:00 UTC)