[HN Gopher] Mercenaries Were More Common in Greek Warfare Than A... ___________________________________________________________________ Mercenaries Were More Common in Greek Warfare Than Ancient Historians Let On Author : diodorus Score : 82 points Date : 2022-10-07 05:03 UTC (1 days ago) (HTM) web link (www.smithsonianmag.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.smithsonianmag.com) | duxup wrote: | I'm curious how the economy of hiring mercenaries worked. | | Was it cheaper than encouraging locals or paying them? | | Did these guy just travel in groups looking for a state to hire | them? | | Could you make a living doing that/ was there enough work or was | this more of an odd job type opportunity for people from places | where there were few options? | rjsw wrote: | > Did these guy just travel in groups looking for a state to | hire them? | | In the case of Swiss ones, yes [1]. | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss_mercenaries | edgyquant wrote: | We're discussing a period thousands of years prior where the | logistical and economic shape of transactions are entirely | different. | | The ancient Greeks worked at a time when even maps were non- | existent and/or a new thing | account-5 wrote: | The Antikythera Mechanism indicates that those assumptions | may not be true. | ch4s3 wrote: | The Antikythera Mechanism dates to the 2nd century BCE, | so about 300 years later than the period in question. | ummonk wrote: | Agree that we can't extrapolate much from the late medieval | era to Ancient Greece. But mapmaking isn't required for | logistical and economic sophistication. All you need is | writing. | Retric wrote: | > Was it cheaper than encouraging locals or paying them? | | A great deal of ancient warfare was profitable as you could | both loot and take slaves after the battle. You can't exactly | pay someone to take their stuff and turn their kids into | slaves. But, you might be able to pay mercenaries to take their | neighbors's stuff. | readthenotes1 wrote: | The Anabasis, by Xenophan, is the story of Greek mercenaries | looking to become wealthy from looted treasures and slaves | hinkley wrote: | The older I get, the more I see the association between | Vikings and Mongols with rape and pillage is just PR. | filoleg wrote: | It isn't just a PR, it is about the scale, especially | when we are talking about Mongols. | | Sure, ancient greeks did raping and pillaging, but | (please correct my historical knowledge here if I am | wrong, because I definitely could be) iirc ancient greeks | didn't come even close to the scale of mongols who | essentially conquered and held and insane chunk of the | continent under their thumb for nearly a century | (counting from the start of what's considered their | golden age until the start of their decline). Especially | considering the time period in question. It is one thing | to control a large occupied territory using modern | logistics, communication, and transportation tech. In the | era before firearms were widely used, telegraph didn't | exist, and where horse cavalries and archers were | extremely relevant, that's a whole other magnitude. | | It's like saying "Nazi Germany atrocities are all just | PR, look at those african warlords over there." Sure, | atrocities of those warlords are absolutely terrible and | inhumane, but it is the scale of Nazi Germany that, | rightfully, gives them that "PR". | boomboomsubban wrote: | >please correct my historical knowledge here if I am | wrong, because I definitely could be | | Alexander the Great was Greek, and though less successful | than the Mongols he conquered a comparable amount of the | world. His personal empire collapsed quickly, but Greeks | still controlled much of it for quite a while. | | His army committed similar atrocities, but we remember | him as "The Great." | Retric wrote: | There are a few ways of comparing them but the Mongol | empire grew to about four and a half times the physical | size of Alexander the great's empire and had at least an | order of magnitude more people. | kasey_junk wrote: | Because it was so prevalent everywhere or because you | think Vikings and Mongols didn't rape & pillage? | inglor_cz wrote: | Not the OP, but yeah, it is like saying "Oh, look, Fred | over here is such a naughty drinker" when the whole city | is chock-full of raging alcoholics. | hinkley wrote: | I am SHOCKED to learn that there is gambling going on in | this establishment! | | Here are your winnings, sir. | Retric wrote: | They both got a reputation for raiding christian | institutions in areas where they where normally left | alone in wartime. A major difference for the people | recording history at the time, but largely meaningless | for most of the population back then. | ALittleLight wrote: | If a city full of raging alcoholics think Fred has a | drinking problem, then he very likely does. | inglor_cz wrote: | Good argument. But maybe the speaker just wants to draw | attention away from his own drinking problem... ? | Ekaros wrote: | Standing armies are freakishly expensive. So either you raise | and train it for some purpose. Have it as mostly second | occupation. Have some specialist paid by area. | | Or just hire some group offering services, allowing your own | people to focus on farming or whatever profitable. | | The ratio of farmers(including their families) to everyone else | is immense through most of history. And most of time soldiers | don't produce anything. | MichaelCollins wrote: | For as long as there have been people with more money than men, I | think there have been mercenaries. Contender for the second | oldest profession. | RangerScience wrote: | Just cuz it's fun to talk about: Third. Food prep is (IMO) the | contender for second :) | WalterBright wrote: | Long ago, I read an article about an experiment where | chimpanzees in captivity were given a banana vending machine. | The machine took tokens that the chimpanzees could earn doing | various tasks. | | The researchers soon found that the male chimps were earning | tokens, getting bananas, and trading the bananas to the female | chimps for sex. | photochemsyn wrote: | I'd guess that fire-starter and flint-knapper are the two | oldest actual professions, with their origins pre-dating the | evolution of 'modern humans'. The so-called 'oldest profession' | (prostitution) likely required the development of agricultural | civilization and wouldn't be that viable within hunter-gatherer | societies. Similar arguments apply to the origins of priests | and kings, to some extent. Hunter-gatherer tribes might also | have had tribal leaders, shamans, and sex-for-food dealings. | ummonk wrote: | Your comment is confusing. Are you saying that tribal leaders | aren't kings, shamans aren't priests, and sex-for-food is not | prostitution? | zkirill wrote: | Xenophon's Anabasis [1] has been on my reading list for a while | but it was difficult to find a particular translation that I was | interested in. | | However, I just checked again and saw that Loeb Classical Library | now offers individual subscriptions! [2] Better yet, it looks | like you can read your book in the browser where original Greek | appears next to the English translation! [3] | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anabasis_(Xenophon) | | [2] https://www.loebclassics.com/page/subscribe/ | | [3] | https://www.loebclassics.com/view/LCL090/1998/pb_LCL090.1.xm... | pjungwir wrote: | Have you seen there is a "Landmark" Anabasis now? I don't know | what the translation is like, but when I read Herodotus & | Thucydides all the maps were a big help, and the appendices had | lots of interesting bits of info. | | If anyone has an opinion on the translation they used, I'd be | curious to hear it. | mgaudet wrote: | Big thumbs up to the Landmark Histories project | (http://thelandmarkancienthistories.com/). Excellent | production value making reading these histories much more | managable -- you're 100% right on the frequent maps and good | appendixes. | | Don't have Anabasis, but Herodotus was excellent. | jeff-davis wrote: | What is the calculation for hiring mercenaries vs volunteers vs | drafts? I would guess it depends on whether you have money or | not. But it also seems like there are other dangers, like being | outbid at the last moment by the enemy and having the mercenaries | turn on you. Or maybe desertion, or being too selective about | their missions. Maybe mercenaries might even drag out a conflict | or misrepresent the conditions in hopes of getting more pay. But | mercenaries probably come already trained and with experience, | and maybe inside knowledge or even special arrangements to ensure | a victory. | | And what is the calculation for being a mercenary? Obviously you | want to avoid becoming cannon fodder, but how do you know? | bombcar wrote: | Mercs that accepted competitive bids would not be hired again | by nearly anyone. | tomcam wrote: | plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose | | The more things change... The more they stay the same | pradn wrote: | In "The Rise and Fall of Classical Greece", Joshua Ober describes | the Mediterranean of the classical period as a zone of free | exchange, unified by a common Greek language, a common set of | commodities (olive oil, wine, grain). This promoted competition, | exchange, and specialization. Another one of these common | commodities was mercenary labor. Ober describes them memorably as | "violence specialists", just as they were craftsmen of amphorae | or viticulturists, haha. Good book to learn of the efflorescence | of Classical Greece, where Athens boasted a 100 different kinds | of craftsmen, where surplus wages were higher than any time until | after the 1890s. | | https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691140919/th... | tomcam wrote: | > "violence specialists" | | Now changing all of my online profiles | [deleted] | inglor_cz wrote: | It reminds me of the Wagner Group motto: "Our business is | death and business is going well." | | They are Russian mercenaries, so a bit of cynicism fits them. | The Ukrainian war may prove too literal for Wagner Group, | though. They are deployed in the worst locations and they had | so many KIAs that they are now recruiting in prisons. | spywaregorilla wrote: | Well they didn't specify whose deaths | [deleted] | andrepd wrote: | > where Athens boasted a 100 different kinds of craftsmen, | where surplus wages were higher than any time until after the | 1890s | | Wow, I find that incredibly hard to believe. Better wages for | tradesmen than ever existed in Rome, Mughal empire, imperial | China, 19th century Britain? I'm curious how he got that | figure. | qwytw wrote: | Empires might not be the places with the highest per capita | productivity. E.g. the Netherlands had the highest | (estimated) GDP per capita in Europe (and probably the world) | between the early 1500's and 1800. | | Not sure about ancient Greece, I would assume that craftsmen | wages in the Low Countries must have been significantly | higher by the late middle ages. | nindalf wrote: | Perhaps they meant in Greece specifically? | smitty1e wrote: | The tech varies; people are constant. | | When we get a time machine and peek in on these ancient | struggles, I anticipate very unromantic and unsurprising results. | hinkley wrote: | Shakespeare's been dead 600 years, and we still make movies | based on his archetypes. | alehlopeh wrote: | Try 400 | WalterBright wrote: | His archetypes aren't original with him, either. | 6stringmerc wrote: | My first reaction to seeing a random few minutes of Outlander | was "ugh those people must have smelled awful!" | karaterobot wrote: | Just to be skeptical here: I grant that the genetic evidence | demonstrates they were foreign, but what is the evidence that | they were mercenaries? That is, that they were professional | soldiers taking money in exchange for fighting in battles. Might | they have been allies? Slaves? Might some of the Greeks also have | been mercenaries? Perhaps this is discussed in the paper, even if | it's not mentioned in the article. | ch4s3 wrote: | Well it's a really mixed group of people all buried in a common | pit. If they were Allie's they'd have been buried in less | heterogeneous groups according their own customs. Some may have | been slaves but that doesn't seem to be a common situation | outside of Sparta and some rare occasions. | | It's well documented that there were a lot of mercenaries used | in the Mediterranean at the time. The Greeks didn't write much | about their own use, but it makes sense. You'd probably want | unit types other than hoplites in a large conflict, and | specialized mercenaries are a great way to achieve that. | ummonk wrote: | It's refreshing to see an ancient DNA study that actually | incorporates archeological context into its interpretations. I've | been seeing a growing increase in ancient DNA papers that make | far reaching conclusions while ignoring archeological context. | Pigalowda wrote: | > Researchers found that many of the soldiers were born far away, | in places like the eastern Baltic, Central Europe, Central Asia | and the Caucasus Mountains. | | I like that because I'm used to thinking that most mercenaries | were Balearic slingers, Numidian horseman, and Cretan archers. | Probably because that's what Caesar wrote about in Conquest of | Gaul. I guess you can't forget about Iberian and Libyan infantry | that Carthage used quite a bit as well as Spartan mercenaries and | the infamous Italian mamertines. | | Caesar: | | Ch. 7 Thither, immediately after midnight, Caesar, using as | guides the same persons who had come to him as messengers from | Iccius, sends some Numidian and Cretan archers, and some | Balearian slingers as a relief to the towns-people, by whose | arrival both a desire to resist together with the hope of [making | good their] defense, was infused into the Remi, and, for the same | reason, the hope of gaining the town, abandoned the enemy. | | Ch 10 Caesar, being apprized of this by Titurius, leads all his | cavalry and light-armed Numidians, slingers and archers, over the | bridge, and hastens toward them. There was a severe struggle in | that place. Our men, attacking in the river the disordered enemy, | slew a great part of them | WastingMyTime89 wrote: | I found this line _The Greeks were also "obsessed with being | Greek" and considered anyone who did not speak the language to be | a "barbarian," as Katherine Reinberger, a bioarchaeologist at the | University of Georgia_ of the article extremely funny. That's a | weird way to say that yes barbaros does indeed mean someone who | does not speak Greek, a foreigner in Ancient Greek. | srcreigh wrote: | I heard that barbarian as a word itself is mocking non Greek | language. Like speech in other languages is just bar bar bar | bar | CactusOnFire wrote: | I mostly hear this word in the context of the Romans, but I | thought that it was a term for facial hair- implying those | external to the "civilized" empire had a tendency for ragged | and long facial hair. | | Hence the term 'barber' for a person that cuts said facial | hair. | hprotagonist wrote: | no, that's a false friend etymology. | | https://www.etymonline.com/word/barber | | "barbarian" is onomatopoeic for "people who talk like bar | bar bar bar and aren't greek". the (themselves barbarian) | romans adopted the term. | unity1001 wrote: | The usage of the word today and back then are not necessarily | the same. | eftychis wrote: | I would say that that statement of Reinberger is a | "sensualized" one. (Also saying "the Greeks think/thought Y" is | like saying "the whole U.S. over 200 years was thinking Y" | times 30+.) | | To add to your comment: Anyone who didn't speak Greek was by | definition a barbarian because that is what it meant. That is | one was barbarizei (~varvarizi) (verb), as that is what other | neighbouring languages sounded (and sound) in our ears: a | constant bar bar (var var) sound. | | The Romans added Latin to the non-sounding var var /barbarian | languages, when they came in contact with us. Mostly out of | prestige/common trade/allying. So the term was later enforced | to mean anyone that doesn't speak Greek or Latin is a | barbarian/"barbarizes." | | And by the time of Pax Romana to mean inferior, as it did not | have the knowledge and resources to learn the lingua franca of | the times. In Hellenistic times, prior, the lingua franca was | Greek, but I am not sure at the moment of the average Joe's | perception on the matter. Generally a lot of trading cities | where open to new ideas so I doubt that it was seen as | inferiority more like a peculiarity or annoyance -- if you were | trying to trade. | | There is the notorious "to an unknown God" inscription/offering | Athenians had [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unknown_God -- if | you excuse my laziness with wikipedia]. That is not the | behaviour of someone obsessed with themselves. | morelisp wrote: | It does literally mean that but it contemporaneously had a | connotation of "not civilized" just as it does today. I don't | think there's a word in English that carries this same double- | meaning. For example, "un-American" certainly has the right | meaning for the second connotation but it's never used in the | purely literal sense. Conversely "foreigner" does have that | literal first sense and can be used with a pejorative | connotation, but still only one meaning; the foreignness is | inherently pejorative, it's not a synecdoche. | Huh1337 wrote: | How about "third world"? | morelisp wrote: | A good suggestion! | perfecthjrjth wrote: | If USA can grant permanent residency in exchange for military | service, the whole world will flock to the states. Isn't it an | instance of mercenerism? | kodah wrote: | > If USA can grant permanent residency in exchange for military | service, the whole world will flock to the states. Isn't it an | instance of mercenerism? | | We already do, at least during war time. I served with someone | who enlisted directly from Mexico and was getting citizenship | in return. Other militaries do it with us too, for instance the | French Foreign Legion and Australian military recruit heavily | out of the US. | lostlogin wrote: | > If USA can grant permanent residency in exchange for military | service, the whole world will flock to the states. | | I'm not so sure about that. | ip26 wrote: | It's certainly an exaggeration, but there are a billion or so | military age people in the world, and millions of people | waiting in the U.S. visa backlog. I would not be surprised if | such a program was very popular. | frozencell wrote: | Nothing about the celts and the gallic/gaul mercenaries who fight | with _many_ tribes? ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-10-08 23:00 UTC)