[HN Gopher] AltaRock Energy Melts Rock with Millimeter Waves for... ___________________________________________________________________ AltaRock Energy Melts Rock with Millimeter Waves for Geothermal Wells (2020) Author : rfreytag Score : 19 points Date : 2022-10-11 17:35 UTC (2 days ago) (HTM) web link (spectrum.ieee.org) (TXT) w3m dump (spectrum.ieee.org) | chatterhead wrote: | "AltaRock estimates that just 0.1 percent of the planet's heat | content could supply humanity's total energy needs for 2 million | years." | | Ummm.. What? | riffic wrote: | one secret the fossil fuel companies don't want you to know! | simonh wrote: | There's a lot of heat down there, and more is continually being | generated through radioactive decay and tidal forces. | TrevorJ wrote: | It seems pants on head crazy that a mere 20 feet or so below the | ground it's a livable and pretty comfortable temperature year | round, virtually worldwide. And yet we spend an enormous amount | of money, time and energy heating and then cooling our living | spaces by almost any other means possible. Yes, the occasional | home has geothermal, but the fact that it's still the exception | baffles me. Heck, if you have a well or even city water then you | are already piping 55-degree fluid into your living space and a | lot of the complicated work is already done. | | I get that there are some tough engineering challenges involved, | but as a species we don't seem all that interested in solving | them relative to the effort we've put into many other endeavors. | retox wrote: | I'd say the overwhelming population of the earth does not want | to live underground like a worm. The first level down might be | OK for some if they still had access to natural sunlight, but | everyone further down, especially to the depths that we would | need to move tower blocks underground, would have a miserable | existence. | TrevorJ wrote: | We don't need to put the living space underground in order to | leverage the thermal mass for heating or cooling. | ianai wrote: | I'd support some directed project to figuring out how to do | geothermal at scale and most efficiently/effectively. Call it | long term infrastructure investment. | Wulfmage wrote: | My partner has an idea on how to conduct this process using | our form of cheap energy. please send us you address at email | morphle at ziggo dot nl | londons_explore wrote: | When you can just burn coal/gas/oil to heat and cool your house | and say 'la la la' loud enough to not hear the environment | dying around you, it really is the best option. | Gravityloss wrote: | Emissions costs are a solution to that. Sadly, some countries | are not part of these agreements. | simonh wrote: | That's easy to say, but nobody is stoping you or anyone else | that thinks that way from building yourselves a home deep | underground. There's no real engineering challenge, we know how | to dig very big, very deep pits, the problem is the costs are | astronomical relative to conventional housing. Not to mention | the huge energy cost and thus carbon footprint of that kind of | construction. | | It's conceivable those costs might be reduced, maybe the Boring | Company will find a solution, but the fact is it involves | moving an awful lot of very heavy material. | TrevorJ wrote: | Leveraging thermal energy != living underground, there are | lots of ways to exchange the thermal energy without needing | to dig a living space, etc. | wcoenen wrote: | > _Yes, the occasional home has geothermal_ | | The use of the word geothermal like that feels like a silly | marketing thing to me. The "geothermal" you are referring to | here, is just a ground source heat pump. A ground source heat | pump is drawing heat from the ground, exploiting the huge (but | not unlimited) thermal mass of the soil. That thermal mass is | the same reason it has a stable temperature year round. | | Ground source heat pumps do not use geothermal energy, i.e. the | 25-30 degC/km heat gradient of the Earth. AltaRock is actually | trying to use geothermal energy. These are two very different | concepts, so we should avoid conflating them, and use different | words to refer to them. | TrevorJ wrote: | I agree the term is technically incorrect but it's still used | as such in the building/architecture industry AFAIK. | Atheros wrote: | It's possible for an entire industry to engage in fraud. We | need not assist though. | tomcam wrote: | As a guy with poor understanding of construction techniques I | sure as hell agree. Looked into it for my farm. I can't build | much underground due to a very high water table. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-10-13 23:00 UTC)