[HN Gopher] How much have tech layoffs affected engineers vs. ot... ___________________________________________________________________ How much have tech layoffs affected engineers vs. other departments? Author : leeny Score : 121 points Date : 2022-10-13 15:49 UTC (7 hours ago) (HTM) web link (blog.interviewing.io) (TXT) w3m dump (blog.interviewing.io) | victor9000 wrote: | I just went through a round of interviews and received offers | from large, small, and medium sized companies. So the | opportunities are still there if you can navigate the interview | gauntlet. | andirk wrote: | I tell people that you are looking for _one_ position, not | 10,000. There will always be a position somewhere that fits | your needs. Its more difficult in down times to a degree. And | if your industry is in a huge slump, find a new industry! | There's more work to do than can ever be done. | spacemadness wrote: | "interviewing.io is both a mock interview platform and an eng | hiring marketplace (engineers use us for technical interview | practice, and top performers get fast-tracked at companies)" | | The source for this article has some strong incentives in the | area of perceptions of increased competitiveness. | leeny wrote: | Author here. For what it's worth, I added the conclusion pretty | late in the game. When I first ran the data, it looked like | engineers were barely getting laid off (because of engineers | not opting in to layoff lists as much as others). And the graph | about the bar going up came in as a zero hour suggestion from | someone who proofread the piece. | | Believe me, I'd be much happier if eng hiring were back in full | swing. With all the freezes and layoffs, we've taken a bigger | hit than we can hope to gain back by shilling interview | practice. | [deleted] | avrionov wrote: | The article doesn't answer the question. The list is also missing | 2 of the big names which announced layoffs Oracle and Citrix. For | more detailed and depressing discussion about layoffs check [1]. | | [1] https://www.thelayoff.com/ | alephnerd wrote: | Well, I wouldn't neccessarily treat the Citrix layoff as | directly macroeconomic related, as they are going through an | M&A event right now with TIBCO to make the "Cloud Software | Group" [0][1], and it's ex-Broadcom leadership (who are very | dollar/efficiency oriented). | | [0] - https://www.cloud.com/news/press-release.html | | [1] - https://www.cloud.com/ | thwayunion wrote: | The market is still extremely tight for good talent in-between | Senior and Junior. | lumost wrote: | So the Senior market is saturated? this is an early sign | companies are getting nervous about bloat. After the '08 | recession many companies rushed to ditch Architect titles as | they found that the role did not serve the interests of their | productive engineers or the companies higher ups. Companies | that had gone heavy on such talent might find themselves stuck. | | I recall seeing talks on "Staff Engineer" and thinking that | this was going to be the next version of "Architect". Engineers | who's primary job is to write code often dislike working with | people in such roles. | thwayunion wrote: | _> So the Senior market is saturated?_ | | I am not sure I would say saturated, but yeah, the Sr. SWE | market is definitely not as tight as it was a year ago for | most role types. However, it does depend on qualifications | and company type. Seniors for R&D positions (so, PhD with 5+ | years in product-focused R&D) are still basically impossible | to hire. Friends tell me that hiring seniors at mid-pay or | low-pay companies is still pretty hard. | | The more important dichotomy is between mid-career/late- | career and junior. The entry level positions are _absolutely | saturated_. CS programs are definitely over-producing at this | point. | no_wizard wrote: | is it CS programs or is it the bootcamps? | | I've seen the bootcamp crowd more often than not in these | situations coming through, not many with actual 4 year CS | degrees, though I've seen many of those too, but not nearly | as much, by an order of magnitude. | | EDIT: could be a difference in what part of the industry we | work in too. I do more frontend / "design engineer" work. | oceanplexian wrote: | CS programs are overproducing but they are overproducing | the wrong skills. Most don't have the cloud skillset or | experience with IaC, they are never thought how to solve | problems within distributed systems. And their idea of | systems design is a Flask app talking to a MySQL database | on a laptop. | | It's not the students fault, but the education system is | constantly behind the times, and sometimes even teach bad | engineering patterns that cause problems and create | technical debt. | mywittyname wrote: | A lot of development jobs can be simplified into a web | endpoint that hits a database. So that seems like a | completely fair project to have students work on in an | applied course. | | Also, universities do offer courses in cloud computing. I | was helping our interns with their cloud computing | courses back in like 2016, so it's not a recent addition | either. | monksy wrote: | > It's not their fault, but the education system is | constantly behind the times. | | Yes/no/maybe. The schools got pressured by the bootcamps | that were teaching the "flask app talking to a mysql db" | .. they simplified their classes and stop teaching some | things. It sucks, the people who come out of that don't | have the theory/flexiblity/skills coming out that you | would expect before. | noir_lord wrote: | Might be true in the US, not what I'm seeing have seen in | the UK. | | Here big companies are taking kids straight out of uni and | boot camping them because decent juniors are hard to find. | lostcolony wrote: | How easy is it to find bad juniors? I think that may be | relevant for determining how saturated the field is. | themagician wrote: | More and more senior engineers are non-coding or practically | so. I see it everywhere. As industries have matured, people | have matured into higher level management roles and there | hasn't been enough people to replace them. There's still | plenty of fresh blood, software engineering actually looks a | lot like the labor shortages do in the rest of the market-- | there's a lack of people who actually want to do the work. | Everyone wants that $150k starting comp. Everyone wants a | $500k director or VP role. But there is a shortage in that | $200-300K range for people who are actually going to put in | hours either writing code that makes it into production, or | managing junior coders and their codebases. I'm talking SV | salaries here. The scale is different elsewhere, but the | problem is the same. | lumost wrote: | Not for nothing, but that sounds a bit like a market peak | if I've heard one. Why would the person actually doing the | work settle for a mere 300k when the director/VP gets | double without doing the hard work? there is a balance here | - but it seems like a good time to lure engineers with | _real_ equity compensation to early stage startups. | dilyevsky wrote: | Which industry has it different? I mean there are | exceptions like sport teams but by and large this stuff | happens everywhere else too. | mapme wrote: | Interesting, anecdotally at a faang adjacent company, I do | not know of any Seniors who do not have code as their | primary output. Even a large majority of staff actively | code IME. | outworlder wrote: | > I recall seeing talks on "Staff Engineer" and thinking that | this was going to be the next version of "Architect". | Engineers who's primary job is to write code often dislike | working with people in such roles. | | That depends. If they are actively involved and the | architectural decisions are sound, it's fine. | | If they are "drive-by architects", showing up, dropping a | bunch of useless boxes they read on some book, and then | leaving before the consequences of their 'architecture' are | known, you are right we don't like working with them. | | At many companies, however, staff engineers are still | engineers. | theteapot wrote: | Drive by architects don't read books. They read AWS's | latest product brochure and think "yes". | dijit wrote: | I think both exist, but you're right. | | The majority of Architects I've brushed against in the | last decade have been exclusively an additional marketing | force for AWS with very little ability to objectively | reason from first principles or assist with knowledge of | anything outside of the AWS ecosystem. | qchris wrote: | Totally genuine question as someone coming from a | background in mechanical engineering, who now does a lot | of software-y things: what do you consider to be "first | principles" in computing? Are you talking about first | principles in terms of project development processes (i.e | how information systems evolve) or code (i.e. bits and | bytes, where microservices might not be the answer | because the network connections are guaranteed to have a | fundamental latency that, along with the amount of data | required, means you can't meet requirements because | [..])? | openfuture wrote: | I think I can name an example, which is how I am | approaching datalisp; https://sr.ht/~ilmu/tala.saman/ the | first principles bit for my context refers to: fixing a | standard encoding that is sufficient for the task, | determining inputs and outputs of model, setting a | general guideline for expressivity of model (space of | conflict-free programs), sketching interaction modes and | user interfaces. | | These are the first principles in question, now from | there your architecture is mostly determined, you can | fall back on known patterns and decades of research. The | axioms are the architecture. | JamesBarney wrote: | Every architect i worked with read books. | | The bad ones took what they read as gospel and the good | ones took what they read in context. | spamizbad wrote: | What makes a "Staff Engineer" is largely a product of an orgs | engineering culture. And you may have multiple people with | "staff engineer" as a job title that fulfill different roles | to varying degrees. | | I've found those roles to be: | | * Technical Leadership (driving major technical initiatives) | | * Technical Contributor (shipping stuff, with technical | mastery beyond what would normally be expected from senior | engineer) | | * Architect (planning stuff) | | * Team Management (mentorship + taking load off an | engineering manager's plate if the team is big) | | Biggest mistake I see orgs make when hiring staff engineers | is hiring someone whose strength is in mentorship and | technical contributors and decide their new role is | architecture and driving major technical initiatives at a | high level. Some are best "in the weeds" and others are | better planners. Know their strengths! | sarchertech wrote: | Staff engineer is just title inflation for what used to be | senior engineer. Senior engineers at most companies just | means this isn't your first job right out of college. | dominotw wrote: | I have 15 yoe and have senior software engineer title so do | people with 2 yrs experience. | | I might be doing same thing over and over. Time to make a | radical change :/. | thwayunion wrote: | There's also nothing wrong with plateauing for a while or | even topping out, especially if you are generally happy | with life and career. There's pride to be had in being a | good individual contributor; not everyone needs to make | it to Senior Super Special Principal :) | spacemadness wrote: | I keep being told I shouldn't be writing code at my level | and should be knee deep in design docs and estimations | all day long. This is actually what happens but I would | much prefer to be writing software and am wondering if I | can even be happy in this career any longer. This | industry has some real bizarre notions of career | progression. | monksy wrote: | There are other organizations that are trying to deflate | titles as well. (Demanding the work of a lead, staff, or | principal in a Sr without the influence to do so) | andsoitis wrote: | What is the spread in compensation, scope of work, level | of responsibility, etc.? | spacemadness wrote: | Depends on the company. The industry can't seem to agree on | what these terms mean. | yulaow wrote: | Here in Europe layoffs are more uncommon but I am having a very | hard time finding open positions compared to just 3 years ago ( | last time I was changing jobs ), and the situation is getting | worse and worse each week that passes. And for juniors is already | far worse: I very rarely see job openings targeted to them | anymore. It seems like everything is frozen. | dont__panic wrote: | In the US, there's definitely less hiring going on, too. Seems | more and more common to shut down a successful interview | pipeline with the "hiring freeze" excuse. | radicalbyte wrote: | There is a large backlash happening against blockchain right | now in Europe, from your profile I would assume that that is | the problem. | yulaow wrote: | Actually it's the opposite. | | I am done with dapps and blockchain development and just | looking for fullstack (preferring only backend when possible) | typescript/golang positions. | | I am getting a good amount of recruiters contacting me for | blockchain related positions but every single time I speak | with them their projects are so ridiculously stupid I am | flabbergasted that they got investors. | | "Normal web dev" recruiters? Just got 5 of them contacting me | in the last 4 weeks and of those I contacted myself: most of | them have ghosted me. Last time I was looking for a new job | in 3 days I had like 30 recruiters already spamming my | linkedin inmail | | Also I put myself in honeypot, talent.io and hired.com. Got | like only one proposal... so thinking something was bad with | my profile I contacted their "talent advisors" and each of | them sort-of told me the profile was perfect but they were | having an hard time getting job openings because of the | "current market situation". | illusiveman wrote: | I used to have 2 requests a week on average on Hired. Now, | my profile has expired twice without a single request. | | Definitely, something is wrong with that service. Guess | fewer companies are using it. | | By contrast, it's odd the day I don't get a message on | LinkedIn. | jmknoll wrote: | I've had good experiences with Hired in my current and | previous job searches. While there are a couple of | companies (the usual suspects) who use it to send out the | same recruiter spam that they send elsewhere, I've mostly | gotten targeted reach-outs for pretty solid roles. I'm | actually starting a job next week that I found with them. | LinkedIn, by comparison, is just a constant stream of | unsolicited garbage. | adam_arthur wrote: | This is likely to be the recession that halts the rapid inflation | in tech wages. | | Rising risk free rate has hit growth companies the hardest, and | there are likely to be a large swath of layoffs right as we have | tons of people bootcamping and switching into the industry. | | Supply and demand of labor in tech will enter balance for the | first time since ~2010. The FFR is looking to have a reasonable | chance to go to 5% at this point, so the pain isn't even close to | being over | | Get used to not being special like pretty much every other | industry | dilyevsky wrote: | Contrary view - this will sprout more startups that were | previously starved for talent rest&vesting at faang&co and | we'll see much tighter market in 2-3 years. | adam_arthur wrote: | It will definitely do that if FAANG comp compresses via lower | equity issuances. The difference is startups generally can't | compensate at the level that FAANGs do or did. | | And if discount rate stays higher, valuations will be much | lower at the same revenue and growth rates than they had been | in the past. | | Of course this also implies the value of the dollars you earn | is greater via opportunity of higher yielding investments. | dilyevsky wrote: | > It will definitely do that if FAANG comp compresses via | lower equity issuances. | | I think it will absolutely happen at least in short term. | In fact in many cases already happened. | chrischen wrote: | Tech is pretty different in that its whole point is automation | and reduction of redundancies. I would imagine over time there | wouldn't be a need for a mediocre engineers as their jobs would | just be done by code written one time by a superior engineer. | | We've seem this already happen to "mom and pop" web dev shops | getting pushed out by the work of a handful of companies | (Weebly, squarespace, Shopify). | adam_arthur wrote: | Yup, a single dev can build out a massive business via | severless cloud components in what used to take a large army | of engineers. | | It just so happens job growth has historically exceeded | efficiency gains. The equilibrium point seems close from my | perspective, especially if there's a shock of recession to | hammer tech employment | PragmaticPulp wrote: | > This is likely to be the recession that halts the rapid | inflation in tech wages. | | I think the transition to remote combined with the recession | will put a damper on high tech salaries. I've already started | seeing pressure from our executives to explore more hiring of | remote workers to cut costs further. | system16 wrote: | > Articles like these drive engineers to speculate on Blind and | on Reddit, in the internet equivalent of hushed whispers, about | whether they're next. | | Bizarre to reference a Blind thread from 2019 discussing Uber | layoffs to back up a claim that engineers are reading the | previously linked articles in the future and speculating about | "whether they're next." | [deleted] | leeny wrote: | Author here. Good call, just fixed to a more generic link about | layoffs on Blind. No shortage of recent conversations. | redleggedfrog wrote: | My company is not hiring developers at the moment, but there sure | are some people who should be let go. | theteapot wrote: | > At some point in the last 2.5 years, you've probably visited | layoffs.fyi. | | I have? | [deleted] | hitpointdrew wrote: | Never even knew it existed until just now. I feel like am not | in the minority. Weird that the author assumes this is some | well known site. | imwillofficial wrote: | Its a very well known site | theteapot wrote: | Within your bubble. | ggm wrote: | They did say _probably_ and for the post hoc case which knows | they didn 't it's hard to believe, but probably on balance, | you're right: maybe they should have used maybe? | walshie4 wrote: | The fact that snap's web3 team being cut is one of the listed | examples is pretty comical IMHO. | jesuspiece wrote: | yea like no shit the web3 fat got cut first lol. anyone with | eyes could see through all the people selling shovels in a gold | rush | andirk wrote: | They also cut their AR wing. Sounds like they're going back | to their laurels: d** pics. | brundolf wrote: | Ah yes, durable blockchains, an obvious next step for the | world's most famous ephemeral-messaging company | wepple wrote: | This is a flimsy PR piece for interviewing.io submitted by the | founder. | | It worked, front page of HN is great for backlink value | xwowsersx wrote: | Just because you can surmise as to the obvious ways in which | writing this post might generally serve the interests of the | author or the company behind does not, in itself, establish | that the piece is flimsy. Your comment, on the other hand, | with its baseless assertion and borderline ad hominem IS | flimsy. Be better. | leeny wrote: | Founder here. This piece took my team and I months to | research and tag and write. We spent hours counting | individual layoffs in spreadsheets and on LinkedIn and | running and rerunning the numbers. And the conclusion wasn't | even what I wanted. When I started writing, I really thought | that the layoffs were overblown and weren't affecting | engineers. That's not what's happening at all. | | Now, you're right, why do we put effort into pieces like | this? It's to get some eyeballs on interviewing.io. | | But this piece is not flimsy, and I think it's not correct or | fair to assume that just because something serves our | business that it's of poor quality. | | Normally I wouldn't say anything, but the "flimsy" thing | really got me. | swader999 wrote: | Ok, now I'm motivated to go read the article. | PragmaticPulp wrote: | > The fact that snap's web3 team being cut is one of the listed | examples is pretty comical IMHO. | | We're seeing a huge influx of applicants who are coming from | failed web3/blockchain projects. It was very much a gold rush | that attracted a lot of people looking to strike it rich. Now | that the momentum has disappeared, the employees of those | projects are all running for safety. | sitzkrieg wrote: | i feel like im on another planet when single digit growth is | considered so bad. and this requirement for endless growth | invariably destroys every product | 01100011 wrote: | We (large FANGish) are more or less in a hiring freeze but still | grabbing a few new hires here and there. A friend just | interviewed for SSE at AAPL and seemed to have the job only to be | told they closed the req. I'm still getting lots of recruiter | spam though so I think we're still fairly early in any sort of | layoff cycle. The economy is still trucking. Despite many people | trying to be first to declare it, we're not in a recession yet. | All signs point to one next year though. | no_wizard wrote: | I'm seeing a massive uptick in recruiting for contract roles | compared to a year ago though. | | A year ago (and even, 3-4 months ago) it was all full time | positions nearly exclusively, now it's all _heavily_ weighted | toward contract | | Lots of "18+ month" or "long term" contract verbiage, but | contract none the less. | | Definitely a shift. | | Seeing more contract to hire too | supernovae wrote: | I've always seen a lot of those, i think the SNR just favors | them for now with general slow down in direct hires. | humanwhosits wrote: | I guess hiring for contracts routes around arbitrary | headcount limits. | kingnothing wrote: | The US is in a recession. It has seen two quarters of negative | economic growth. | RC_ITR wrote: | I feel like a broken record but, the 'Two quarters' rule is | an unofficial metric that does a bad job of representing | recessions when you back-test it (no recessions from | 1992-2008 in that case). | | In the US, a recession is defined by NBER after the fact. | danuker wrote: | Then the "two quarters" rule is stricter. We have fulfilled | a stricter criterion for a recession. | | Whether the NBER contradicts us is irrelevant. Less value | is going around in the economy. | mywittyname wrote: | I mean, if you're going to stick to the two-consecutive | quarters definition, then you would be saying that we | _were_ in a recession, and are now out of one. Third | quarter GDP estimates stand at 1.9% growth. | zeroonetwothree wrote: | GDPNow has it at 2.9% even | rjcjvyd77 wrote: | sieabahlpark wrote: | RC_ITR wrote: | Ok, let's play your game. How much of the first quarter | decline was due to the ports clearing and imports rising? | | Here, I'll give you a hint (More than 100%): | https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/fredgraph.png?g=UOxC | | Do you think that's a real recession indicator? | | EDIT: Said differently, if our imports were at 4Q:21 | levels, we'd have 0 quarters of decline. So is this the | first import-driven recession? Because no other | recessions have been like this. | RivieraKid wrote: | No, it's not stricter. It's a rule of thumb, an | approximation. | nostromo wrote: | > In the US, a recession is defined by NBER after the fact. | | This isn't true. There is no "official" declaration of | recessions in the US. NBER is referenced by some federal | officials, but it's just one signal of many. | | Bar far, the most common definition used worldwide is two | quarters of negative growth -- and by that definition we're | already in a recession. | | I think a lot of folks don't even know that NBER isn't a | government organization. It's a private non-profit with a | bunch of self-appointed academics that don't even publicly | disclose their meeting notes or their criteria for what a | recession is. People treat them like the Oracle of Delphi | and it's very misplaced. | beebmam wrote: | This is a point of contention among economists, as the | current economic conditions are quite unlike most others | seen. US/China decoupling is causing massive shocks across | the world. | | The US Federal Reserve is responding to these economic | conditions far stronger than any other central bank, and the | US dollar has grown in strength accordingly. Weakening the | labor market is one of the goals. That will mean lots of | layoffs, in exchange for a reduction in inflation (and | domestic purchasing power). | the_lonely_road wrote: | This is a pointless battle. There is a US election this year | so there is zero chance a recession will be admitted until | mid November regardless of facts on the ground. | colinmhayes wrote: | US gov uses a non-partisan third party think tank to | officially declare recessions. | kyleblarson wrote: | If you believe there exists a "non partisan third party | think tank" I have a bridge to sell you in Arizona. | Jensson wrote: | > a non-partisan third party think tank | | How can such a thing possibly be non-partisan? The people | running surely vote in the elections and thus care about | the outcome, I don't see how they couldn't be partisan | when their statements can have huge effects on the | outcome. | mywittyname wrote: | Non-partisan usually means people aren't directly | influenced by political leadership. Pelosi has no | recourse if NBER doesn't make the decision that she | wants, whereas, she can punish/reward the junior | Congresspeople in her party by withholding seats or | funding for election campaigns. Thus, NBER is non- | partisan while Democratic Congresspeople are partisan. | | I would hope that every member of NBER votes. It's their | civic duty. | Jensson wrote: | In that case why wouldn't they try to influence the | election? It depends on what kind of people sit there, | but most academics favor democrats. So I don't see how | that statement gives us a good reason to believe that | they aren't taking one side here. | mywittyname wrote: | Data for Q3 will be released on Oct 27 (before the | election). And current estimates for ~2.0% growth. Thus, | the country will technically be "out of a recession" by | election time. | | I wonder if these people claiming that we are "technically | in a recession" will suddenly start saying that economy has | recovered come Oct 28. | bloppe wrote: | Unemployment is at a historic low, which is not typical of a | recession. | MisterBastahrd wrote: | The economy is shrinking because boomers are retiring at a | rate faster than we can fill jobs. The Boomer economists at | the Fed have responded by raising interest rates so that | Xers, Millennials, and Zoomers don't get uppity and ask for | more money. | ls65536 wrote: | > The Boomer economists at the Fed have responded by | raising interest rates so that Xers, Millennials, and | Zoomers don't get uppity and ask for more money. | | Maybe so, but you might want to also consider at the same | time what's happening to all that Boomer wealth mostly | tied up in retirement accounts (stocks and bonds) and in | the real estate that they own while these interest rates | rise. Sure, the effects here aren't equally distributed | (neither generationally nor by asset class), but hardly | anybody is getting away unscathed. | 01100011 wrote: | I believe it's typical before a recession though :D | smeagull wrote: | We have horrible ways of measuring economic growth. I'll be | worried when it starts affecting things in the real world. | mkl95 wrote: | My employer has literally stopped hiring engineers and product | roles. Sales people are still being hired in droves though. | marcyb5st wrote: | Aren't sales people "cheap" as their salary is negligible | compared to sales bonuses if and only if they exceed their | sales quota? | jedberg wrote: | Not usually. Oftentimes sales people have pretty high base | pay. Last time I worked somewhere with a sales force, their | base was the same as the engineers with the same level of | experience, and then they got commission on top of that. | mkl95 wrote: | I don't know. My bosses claim good engineers are a nightmare | to find. Cash is surely not the bottleneck. | ge96 wrote: | Small company $40-50B hiring freeze (for everyone not just eng) | for a month to assess. | smeagull wrote: | We've seen a few people leave for other jobs, and are still | hiring. Still getting offers from recruiters. | | I haven't seen this play out in the real world yet beyond news | stories. | nobodyandproud wrote: | My firm is still playing the long game, so we've been actively | hiring talent. | | Check back if/when a recession is in full swing. | sremani wrote: | Everyone plays a long game until the cost of debt and debt | servicing comes home. There are just too many Zombie Unicorns, | it is matter of time. If your company is not profitable | consider yourself jobless 6 months from now. | yamazakiwi wrote: | Are you positing that if we maintain our current trajectory | economically that Zombie Unicorns will start harshly cutting | costs. Why 6 months? I'm actually curious why that number as | I'm not in the environment. | conqrr wrote: | The so called 'bar' references doesn't make much sense. There is | no way to measure the performance of an individual. Leetcode | style questions don't indicate performance. And what cannot be | measured in the first place in a 4 hour interview, cannot have a | 'bar'. | 0xB31B1B wrote: | There are absolutely ways to measure the performance of an | individual. That leetcode style questions are not a great | indicator of ability to do the job well does not mean you | cannot predict job performance at all. | conqrr wrote: | The bar here is interview performance bar. There is no way to | judge a person's performance in 4 hours. Anything you come up | with can be hacked or imperfect. Therefore there is no way to | set a bar. | 0xB31B1B wrote: | You can't perfectly judge someone in an interview context, | but you can get pretty good if you ask the right questions | with the right structure. Where I work the final round | interview we give the candidates a week to write a design | doc for a recent project they have worked on and present it | to us in a 45 minute meeting. We deep dive on their impact, | the decisions they made, the tradeoffs etc. It has been an | extremely strong signal for us. | imwillofficial wrote: | I love this method. | nsxwolf wrote: | In my current role I've done about 30 whiteboard interviews | in the last 2.5 years, and I come down on the side that | they are about as predictive as throwing darts. | | The most successful candidates I've helped hire in my | career were the ones where we had an informal process where | we just talked about things and I went with my gut. They | say that's not objective or measurable, full of bias, etc. | | I toss my hands up in frustration. | pineconewarrior wrote: | I have not seen or heard of any engineering cuts in any of my | circle's workplaces. Only supporting staff (project managers | etc). | | I clicked on a few of the google sheets linked in the article and | it seems (at least per my random selection) that this seems to be | the case at these places too. | pcurve wrote: | Managers are still so busy trying to fill open headcounts because | it's usually use it or lose it. But they know hiring freeze is | coming ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-10-13 23:00 UTC)