[HN Gopher] Replace the "Very" in Your Sentence ___________________________________________________________________ Replace the "Very" in Your Sentence Author : no-reply Score : 45 points Date : 2022-10-13 21:34 UTC (1 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.losethevery.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.losethevery.com) | baal80spam wrote: | Very + healthy = instrumental | | What? | metadat wrote: | What's not very healthy about an instrument? Think about it. Or | very don't. | smeagull wrote: | Yeah, just use literally. It's literally a better word. | [deleted] | swayvil wrote: | Very + excellent = not yet added | | Very + squamous = nya | | Very + blue = nya | | Lol | tallytarik wrote: | There's a good reason _not_ to do this: your new fancy word is | less likely to be understood by those with lower English | literacy. | DonHopkins wrote: | Very anti-intellectual. | tallytarik wrote: | Not Yet Added | DonHopkins wrote: | Q: How many Northern Californians does it take to change a | lightbulb? | | A: Hella!!! | | Q: How many Southern Californians does it take to change a | lightbulb? | | A: Totally!!! | | There's a perceptual dialectological difference between "hella | pregnant" (Northern California) and "totally pregnant" (Southern | California). | | Hella Nor Cal or Totally So Cal? The Perceptual Dialectology of | California | | http://eng.sagepub.com/content/35/4/325.abstract | | https://web.archive.org/web/20141008111115/https://people.du... | | This study provides the first detailed account of perceptual | dialectology within California (as well as one of the first | accounts of perceptual dialectology within any single state). | Quantitative analysis of a map-labeling task carried out in | Southern California reveals that California's most salient | linguistic boundary is between the northern and southern regions | of the state. Whereas studies of the perceptual dialectology of | the United States as a whole have focused almost exclusively on | regional dialect differences, respondents associated particular | regions of California less with distinctive dialects than with | differences in language (English versus Spanish), slang use, and | social groups. The diverse sociolinguistic situation of | California is reflected in the emphasis both on highly salient | social groups thought to be stereotypical of California by | residents and nonresidents alike (e.g., surfers) and on groups | that, though prominent in the cultural landscape of the state, | remain largely unrecognized by outsiders (e.g., hicks). | | [...] | | By far, the most frequently remarked-upon slang term in the map- | labeling data was hella, accounting for 47.4 percent of the slang | and other lexical labels. Hella is a slang term originating in | Northern California and one that remains--aside from a few brief | moments in the national spotlight due to its circulation in | popular culture-- largely restricted to that region (Bucholtz | 2006). The term, which apparently lexicalized from (a) hell of | (a), functions as both a quantifier (There were hella people | there) and an intensifier (He runs hella fast). Four respondents | also mentioned the slang term hecka, the G-rated equivalent of | hella, but this term was not counted separately, because tokens | of hecka always co-occurred with hella. For Southern Californians | in particular, hella represents a crucial shibboleth separating | the two major regions of the state. As shown in Figure 7, | respondents tended to identify hella overwhelmingly as a Northern | California slang term, and its appearance in other regions of the | map drops dramatically from north to south. Thus Northern | California was variously labeled the hellas, Land of the Hella's, | and Hella capital, and one respondent provided an isogloss | designating "the 'hella' line." (In the map data, the Central | Coast around Santa Barbara seemed to be the dividing line between | users and nonusers of hella, and the fact that the study was | conducted in this region may have enhanced respondents' focus on | this particular issue.) [*10: The respondent's confusion may also | be due to the existence of the Crips, a notorious Los Angeles- | based gang.] Hella users were also negatively evaluated by | Southern Californians, and the term came in for a good deal of | criticism, such as Hella is not a real word and [hecka is] | probably the worst word ever. | | Isogloss: | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isogloss | | Hella: | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hella | | >Hella is an American slang term that originated in the San | Francisco Bay Area. It is used as an intensifying adverb such as | in "hella bad" or "hella good" and was eventually added to the | Oxford English Dictionary in 2002. It is possibly a contraction | of the phrase "hell of a" or "hell of a lot [of]", in turn | reduced to "hell of", though some scholars doubt this etymology | since its grammatical usage does not align with those phrases. It | often appears in place of the words "really", "a lot", "totally", | "very", and in some cases, "yes". Whereas hell of a is generally | used with a noun, according to linguist Pamela Munro, hella is | primarily used to modify an adjective such as "good". | | Usage: | | Intensifier | | While intensifiers similar to hella exist in many colloquial | varieties, hella is uncommonly flexible. It can be used to modify | almost any part of speech, as shown below: | | That pizza was hella good: hella modifies the adjective good, | where Standard American English would use very. | | Chris's pizza is hella better than anyone else's: hella modifies | the adjective better, replacing much. | | I ate hella pizza: hella modifies the noun pizza, replacing a lot | of. | | I hella bought four pizzas: hella modifies the verb to buy, | replacing really or totally. | | I ran to the pizza joint hella quickly: hella modifies the adverb | quickly, replacing very. | | Was the party fun last night? -- Hella!: hella is used on its own | as a reply replacing very or totally. | | SI prefix | | An online petition begun in 2010 by Austin Sendek of Yreka, | California seeks to establish "hella-" as the SI prefix for 1027. | The prefix was recognized by Google in May 2010, and Wolfram | Alpha in May 2011. In 2013, Andrew McAfee suggested the term | hellabyte with this usage. | | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25788993 | | Quixotic Californian crusade to officially recognize the | hellabyte (theregister.com) | | https://www.theregister.com/2021/01/14/hellabyte_si_prefix/ | | The Californians: | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tt-tG6ufH90 | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIklKPzND20 | hey2022 wrote: | I hear people use totally much more often than hella in the Bay | Area. | Blammar wrote: | "very hard" -> formidable ? I don't agree because there are | multiple interpretations. I would have liked multiple results, | e.g., formidable, diamond-like, arduous, etc. | | In other words, don't use this site blindly. | Crazyontap wrote: | > In other words, don't use this site blindly. | | Very true! | | For example: | | Very + Old = Ancient | | My granda is very old vs My grandma is ancient. | chitowneats wrote: | "Very old" is still rude. Seems roughly equivalent to me. | DiggyJohnson wrote: | While I think this advise of yours should be clear to any user | of a thesaurus or this site, I figured I'd share my default | answer to a replacement for "very hard". | | "very hard" -> "difficult" | | Which is interesting because that's also an opinionated synonym | for "hard", which without context has many definitions and | interpretations. I'm also not even sure I think of "difficult" | as being more hard than hard. I digress. Have a good evening. | THENATHE wrote: | Formitible for difficult, and for something like hardness you | could use "extremely" | nomel wrote: | Another with multiple interpretations: very + gay = glamorous | aeturnum wrote: | On one hand, I think this kind of service can help people expand | their vocabularies. | | On the other hand, there's a downside risk of replacing | unimaginative writing with confused writing. "very + fragile -> | feeble" is absolutely not a reliable translation[1]. The | suggestions furnished by this service seem to generally 'work' in | the sense that their possible meanings include "very + | (category)," but without context you explode the set of messages | you might communicate. Something that is fragile breaks easily. | Something that is very fragile more so. Something that is feeble | is lacking strength in general, it may give out at any time, it | connotes a sense of being underweight, etc. All concepts that | "very fragile" may be hoping to avoid invoking (however | clumsily). | | Switching words switches meanings. | | [1] One might argue that 'fragile' does not need assistance at | all in this case. | WaitWaitWha wrote: | I ran a few words through and I am not willing to buy into the | elimination of very. | | As noted (very or not) _unique_ and _incomparable_ are not the | same. These words have nuanced differences. | | Every word I checked failed to provide the a proper equivalent. | Context matters. | | _very hard_ is not always _demanding_ | | _very clean_ = /= _sparkling_ | | _very old_ = /= _ancient_ | | _very dark_ = /= _bleak_ | Imnimo wrote: | You have to use a _lot_ of judgment to pare these down, or you | 'll do more harm than good. | | "My car is very fast" -> "My car is breakneck" | | "It's going to be very cold tomorrow" -> "It's going to be | Siberian tomorrow" | | "Those shoes are very expensive" -> "Those shoes are lavish" | RcouF1uZ4gsC wrote: | You can usually replace "very" with "fuckin'" and convey the same | meaning. | [deleted] | mesarvagya wrote: | Fuckin true | iLoveOncall wrote: | "very rude" is turned into "ill-mannered". I would say the second | one is softer (very soft actually) than "rude". | | For many of them, looking into multiple dictionaries it appears | that they are synonymous of the word, rather than a stronger | meaning. | alibrarydweller wrote: | "So avoid using the word 'very' because it's lazy. A man is not | very tired, he is exhausted. Don't use very sad, use morose. | Language was invented for one reason, boys - to woo women - and, | in that endeavor, laziness will not do. It also won't do in your | essays." -- The Dead Poets Society | wizofaus wrote: | Great movie but not the best advice - "morose" doesn't even | mean "very sad", it means ill-tempered/in a bad mood. I | wouldn't even say there is one good word that means "very sad", | but "morose" is definitely not it. The site in question came up | with "inconsolable", but that's hardly appropriate if you're | talking about "very sad news" (after a few attempts it come | back with "somber" which at least sort of works in that case, | though I'd still struggle to imagine myself telling a friend | that their divorce was "sombre news"). | me_again wrote: | Mark Twain supposedly said: | | Substitute 'damn' every time you're inclined to write 'very'. | Your editor will delete it and the writing will be just as it | should be. | dang wrote: | https://quoteinvestigator.com/2012/08/29/substitute-damn/ | MisterSandman wrote: | Outside of writing an English essay, I don't see why the use of | very is looked down upon. "Very good" or "very smart" is fine and | is common in everyday speech. | sxg wrote: | One reason is because "very + <adjective>" often only vaguely | approximates what the writer means. "Very good" has such a wide | range of interpretations that it almost has no meaning. If I | tell you I went to a "very good" restaurant, then how was my | experience? Was it above average? A step beyond merely | acceptable? Best restaurant ever? | | Alternatively, saying that "I went to a marvelous restaurant" | better indicates that my experience was exceptional. | bckygldstn wrote: | Very works but it's missing out on an opportunity to give more | detail. | | Most of the adjectives in this app have multiple alternatives, | one of which is likely closer to what you're trying to | represent. | | Or to put it another way: concepts like "smartness" are | complicated and multidimensional. Someone who is "very smart" | could be: good at their job, naturally intelligent, built up | knowledge though experience and hard work, street-smart, | smarter than average, smartest person in the world ever etc. | | I wouldn't say there's always a better single word alternative | to "very adjective" but it's worth thinking about when writing | (and probably not worth thinking about in everyday speech!). | nomel wrote: | Big words better. How else will you immediately judge someone's | intellect? | DonHopkins wrote: | By if they say something anti-intellectual like that. | lintroller wrote: | Accuracy and precision is vital in communication. I agree | that the speaker does have a responsibility to know his | audience and shouldn't use fancy words to project intellect, | education, or status. However, if there is an opportunity to | be more exact, one should take it without remorse. | nicoburns wrote: | I would agree that accuracy is important, and sometimes | technical words can help with this. But all too often | people use big words just to sound intelligent and only end | up obscuring their message. | gpm wrote: | Accuracy and precision is sometimes vital, but modifying | words with very is frequently a good way of achieving that. | | "I want a fast game", "I want a very fast game". This site | suggests "rapid", "breakneck", and "dashing" as | alternatives for "very fast". "Very fast" is pretty clear | very precise compared to those words. Maybe I could speak | about "a breakneck pace" instead, but would I have really | gained anything other than showing off my vocabulary? | | Speaking of very precise, it doesn't even have a suggestion | for an alternative to that - though admittedly if I wasn't | forcing things I would have phrased that sentence as "more | precise than those words". | nomel wrote: | I agree completely. Just don't take someones plainly worded | communication with less value, only because it's plainly | worded. | | Of course, this all falls completely apart with groups | containing a significant number of members with <language> | as a second language, where plain speech is required. | DiggyJohnson wrote: | I think this sort of perspective is becoming a bit of a meme. | Not every use of longer or uncommon words is for the sake of | signalling intellect or w/e. This is just such a negative, | juvenile perspective to take if you are deploying it often. | nomel wrote: | I was referring to the reverse perspective of perceiving | intellect, rather than signaling intellect. | | It definitely happens both ways, but I think it's much more | damaging to those who are perceived as being dumb, or whose | ideas are not considered, because they're direct/plain. | | I see this fairly often in meetings. Someone says something | very direct and plain, with the root of the problem laid | out, but it fails some "complexity" threshold that makes | the contrived, incorrect, but fancifully worded explanation | get more traction, eventually looping back around to the | simple explanation, with no real acknowledgment. | trog wrote: | This is missing an important factor for writing: context. There | are many places where it's fine to wax lyrical and reach for the | thesaurus. But if you're trying to write clearly and concisely | then there is something to be said for simplicity. | protomyth wrote: | _very + unique = incomparable_ | | Nice, although a rather large group of TV viewers of The West | Wing know that "unique means one of a kind, something can't be | very unique"[0]. It still amazes me how some of the quotes from | that show stick with me all these years later. | | 0) https://youtu.be/Fvb1e4-YgRE?t=162 or the whole scene | https://youtu.be/Fvb1e4-YgRE | TrevorJ wrote: | The dialogue in that show was fantastic. I'd love to see more | shows with that particular sort of stylization. Sorkin is | _very_ unique. | crtified wrote: | When emphasising language becomes habitual, it's intended impact | may actually be lessened, by way of the "boy crying wolf" effect. | That is, if everything is described as "very" and "really" and | "actually", then those emphasisers no longer stand out. We start | to ignore them, and the collective energy spent writing them is | somewhat wasted. | | So I say: let a standalone word suffice, whenever possible. Save | emphasis for appropriate moments. | [deleted] | HL33tibCe7 wrote: | > very + difficult = strenuous | | It also offered up "laborious" and "challenging". None convey the | actual intended meaning | kens wrote: | Very nice! | coding123 wrote: | Very charming! | daveslash wrote: | _Very Funny_ you two..... | imwillofficial wrote: | This website is the epitome of "do one thing and do it well" | | Bravo | BarryMilo wrote: | I mean, the idea is interesting but I don't think it's done | very... well. | jordanwallwork wrote: | I find it frustrating that you have to click to refresh the | result. Why it doesnt't autorefresh after a short period | makes no sense to me. I kept typing in words and thinking it | was getting no results before realising I had to keep hitting | the refresh button | thayne wrote: | it doesn't even refresh if you hit the "enter" key on your | keyboard. | __derek__ wrote: | I expected the site to literally lose the 'very' a la Hemingway's | quip about ten-dollar words. | DonHopkins wrote: | discovery - very = disco | | bravery - very = bra | | delivery - very = deli | | slavery - very = sla | powersnail wrote: | I've seen such advice in many writing forums (other examples | include don't use adverbs, don't use passive voice, etc.), and | while it certainly pays to heed your choice of vocabulary, I'm | not convinced that simply avoiding a fixed set of words or forms | is good advice. Let alone replacing them with a fixed set of | substitutes. | | Open a few good books and essays, and see if there are adverbs, | "very", passive voices, or other bad forms. These are reputable | works written by careful and capable writers, and enjoyed by many | readers. If they are all deemed wrong in the eyes of such advice, | it's the advice that's wrong. | | The valuable lesson is to actively _think_ about the words you | use, whether the text accurately convey what you mean, in the | tone you desire, and is readable by your intended audience. | | I'd say a good pair of thesaurus and dictionary is much better | than this website. At least you got multiple candidates, an | explanation of each, and get to choose the most appropriate one. | thayne wrote: | Easy way to stump it: Take the output and put it in the input. | very + cute -> adorable. very adorable -> no result (may need to | repeat for some words). | Kiro wrote: | Why not just put in gibberish? Why bother using the output? | DonHopkins wrote: | very very => no result | | very slightly => no result | | very not => no result | | ;( | version_five wrote: | Extremely | ruined wrote: | ludicrous | [deleted] | lxchase wrote: | Looks like you can see what adjectives are in the database at | this endpoint: | https://api.airtable.com/v0/appHLMobCaTLuVQQy/Data?api_key=k... ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-10-13 23:00 UTC)