[HN Gopher] Replace the "Very" in Your Sentence
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Replace the "Very" in Your Sentence
        
       Author : no-reply
       Score  : 45 points
       Date   : 2022-10-13 21:34 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.losethevery.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.losethevery.com)
        
       | baal80spam wrote:
       | Very + healthy = instrumental
       | 
       | What?
        
         | metadat wrote:
         | What's not very healthy about an instrument? Think about it. Or
         | very don't.
        
       | smeagull wrote:
       | Yeah, just use literally. It's literally a better word.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | swayvil wrote:
       | Very + excellent = not yet added
       | 
       | Very + squamous = nya
       | 
       | Very + blue = nya
       | 
       | Lol
        
       | tallytarik wrote:
       | There's a good reason _not_ to do this: your new fancy word is
       | less likely to be understood by those with lower English
       | literacy.
        
         | DonHopkins wrote:
         | Very anti-intellectual.
        
           | tallytarik wrote:
           | Not Yet Added
        
       | DonHopkins wrote:
       | Q: How many Northern Californians does it take to change a
       | lightbulb?
       | 
       | A: Hella!!!
       | 
       | Q: How many Southern Californians does it take to change a
       | lightbulb?
       | 
       | A: Totally!!!
       | 
       | There's a perceptual dialectological difference between "hella
       | pregnant" (Northern California) and "totally pregnant" (Southern
       | California).
       | 
       | Hella Nor Cal or Totally So Cal? The Perceptual Dialectology of
       | California
       | 
       | http://eng.sagepub.com/content/35/4/325.abstract
       | 
       | https://web.archive.org/web/20141008111115/https://people.du...
       | 
       | This study provides the first detailed account of perceptual
       | dialectology within California (as well as one of the first
       | accounts of perceptual dialectology within any single state).
       | Quantitative analysis of a map-labeling task carried out in
       | Southern California reveals that California's most salient
       | linguistic boundary is between the northern and southern regions
       | of the state. Whereas studies of the perceptual dialectology of
       | the United States as a whole have focused almost exclusively on
       | regional dialect differences, respondents associated particular
       | regions of California less with distinctive dialects than with
       | differences in language (English versus Spanish), slang use, and
       | social groups. The diverse sociolinguistic situation of
       | California is reflected in the emphasis both on highly salient
       | social groups thought to be stereotypical of California by
       | residents and nonresidents alike (e.g., surfers) and on groups
       | that, though prominent in the cultural landscape of the state,
       | remain largely unrecognized by outsiders (e.g., hicks).
       | 
       | [...]
       | 
       | By far, the most frequently remarked-upon slang term in the map-
       | labeling data was hella, accounting for 47.4 percent of the slang
       | and other lexical labels. Hella is a slang term originating in
       | Northern California and one that remains--aside from a few brief
       | moments in the national spotlight due to its circulation in
       | popular culture-- largely restricted to that region (Bucholtz
       | 2006). The term, which apparently lexicalized from (a) hell of
       | (a), functions as both a quantifier (There were hella people
       | there) and an intensifier (He runs hella fast). Four respondents
       | also mentioned the slang term hecka, the G-rated equivalent of
       | hella, but this term was not counted separately, because tokens
       | of hecka always co-occurred with hella. For Southern Californians
       | in particular, hella represents a crucial shibboleth separating
       | the two major regions of the state. As shown in Figure 7,
       | respondents tended to identify hella overwhelmingly as a Northern
       | California slang term, and its appearance in other regions of the
       | map drops dramatically from north to south. Thus Northern
       | California was variously labeled the hellas, Land of the Hella's,
       | and Hella capital, and one respondent provided an isogloss
       | designating "the 'hella' line." (In the map data, the Central
       | Coast around Santa Barbara seemed to be the dividing line between
       | users and nonusers of hella, and the fact that the study was
       | conducted in this region may have enhanced respondents' focus on
       | this particular issue.) [*10: The respondent's confusion may also
       | be due to the existence of the Crips, a notorious Los Angeles-
       | based gang.] Hella users were also negatively evaluated by
       | Southern Californians, and the term came in for a good deal of
       | criticism, such as Hella is not a real word and [hecka is]
       | probably the worst word ever.
       | 
       | Isogloss:
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isogloss
       | 
       | Hella:
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hella
       | 
       | >Hella is an American slang term that originated in the San
       | Francisco Bay Area. It is used as an intensifying adverb such as
       | in "hella bad" or "hella good" and was eventually added to the
       | Oxford English Dictionary in 2002. It is possibly a contraction
       | of the phrase "hell of a" or "hell of a lot [of]", in turn
       | reduced to "hell of", though some scholars doubt this etymology
       | since its grammatical usage does not align with those phrases. It
       | often appears in place of the words "really", "a lot", "totally",
       | "very", and in some cases, "yes". Whereas hell of a is generally
       | used with a noun, according to linguist Pamela Munro, hella is
       | primarily used to modify an adjective such as "good".
       | 
       | Usage:
       | 
       | Intensifier
       | 
       | While intensifiers similar to hella exist in many colloquial
       | varieties, hella is uncommonly flexible. It can be used to modify
       | almost any part of speech, as shown below:
       | 
       | That pizza was hella good: hella modifies the adjective good,
       | where Standard American English would use very.
       | 
       | Chris's pizza is hella better than anyone else's: hella modifies
       | the adjective better, replacing much.
       | 
       | I ate hella pizza: hella modifies the noun pizza, replacing a lot
       | of.
       | 
       | I hella bought four pizzas: hella modifies the verb to buy,
       | replacing really or totally.
       | 
       | I ran to the pizza joint hella quickly: hella modifies the adverb
       | quickly, replacing very.
       | 
       | Was the party fun last night? -- Hella!: hella is used on its own
       | as a reply replacing very or totally.
       | 
       | SI prefix
       | 
       | An online petition begun in 2010 by Austin Sendek of Yreka,
       | California seeks to establish "hella-" as the SI prefix for 1027.
       | The prefix was recognized by Google in May 2010, and Wolfram
       | Alpha in May 2011. In 2013, Andrew McAfee suggested the term
       | hellabyte with this usage.
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25788993
       | 
       | Quixotic Californian crusade to officially recognize the
       | hellabyte (theregister.com)
       | 
       | https://www.theregister.com/2021/01/14/hellabyte_si_prefix/
       | 
       | The Californians:
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tt-tG6ufH90
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIklKPzND20
        
         | hey2022 wrote:
         | I hear people use totally much more often than hella in the Bay
         | Area.
        
       | Blammar wrote:
       | "very hard" -> formidable ? I don't agree because there are
       | multiple interpretations. I would have liked multiple results,
       | e.g., formidable, diamond-like, arduous, etc.
       | 
       | In other words, don't use this site blindly.
        
         | Crazyontap wrote:
         | > In other words, don't use this site blindly.
         | 
         | Very true!
         | 
         | For example:
         | 
         | Very + Old = Ancient
         | 
         | My granda is very old vs My grandma is ancient.
        
           | chitowneats wrote:
           | "Very old" is still rude. Seems roughly equivalent to me.
        
         | DiggyJohnson wrote:
         | While I think this advise of yours should be clear to any user
         | of a thesaurus or this site, I figured I'd share my default
         | answer to a replacement for "very hard".
         | 
         | "very hard" -> "difficult"
         | 
         | Which is interesting because that's also an opinionated synonym
         | for "hard", which without context has many definitions and
         | interpretations. I'm also not even sure I think of "difficult"
         | as being more hard than hard. I digress. Have a good evening.
        
         | THENATHE wrote:
         | Formitible for difficult, and for something like hardness you
         | could use "extremely"
        
         | nomel wrote:
         | Another with multiple interpretations: very + gay = glamorous
        
       | aeturnum wrote:
       | On one hand, I think this kind of service can help people expand
       | their vocabularies.
       | 
       | On the other hand, there's a downside risk of replacing
       | unimaginative writing with confused writing. "very + fragile ->
       | feeble" is absolutely not a reliable translation[1]. The
       | suggestions furnished by this service seem to generally 'work' in
       | the sense that their possible meanings include "very +
       | (category)," but without context you explode the set of messages
       | you might communicate. Something that is fragile breaks easily.
       | Something that is very fragile more so. Something that is feeble
       | is lacking strength in general, it may give out at any time, it
       | connotes a sense of being underweight, etc. All concepts that
       | "very fragile" may be hoping to avoid invoking (however
       | clumsily).
       | 
       | Switching words switches meanings.
       | 
       | [1] One might argue that 'fragile' does not need assistance at
       | all in this case.
        
       | WaitWaitWha wrote:
       | I ran a few words through and I am not willing to buy into the
       | elimination of very.
       | 
       | As noted (very or not) _unique_ and _incomparable_ are not the
       | same. These words have nuanced differences.
       | 
       | Every word I checked failed to provide the a proper equivalent.
       | Context matters.
       | 
       |  _very hard_ is not always _demanding_
       | 
       |  _very clean_ = /= _sparkling_
       | 
       |  _very old_ = /= _ancient_
       | 
       |  _very dark_ = /= _bleak_
        
       | Imnimo wrote:
       | You have to use a _lot_ of judgment to pare these down, or you
       | 'll do more harm than good.
       | 
       | "My car is very fast" -> "My car is breakneck"
       | 
       | "It's going to be very cold tomorrow" -> "It's going to be
       | Siberian tomorrow"
       | 
       | "Those shoes are very expensive" -> "Those shoes are lavish"
        
       | RcouF1uZ4gsC wrote:
       | You can usually replace "very" with "fuckin'" and convey the same
       | meaning.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | mesarvagya wrote:
         | Fuckin true
        
       | iLoveOncall wrote:
       | "very rude" is turned into "ill-mannered". I would say the second
       | one is softer (very soft actually) than "rude".
       | 
       | For many of them, looking into multiple dictionaries it appears
       | that they are synonymous of the word, rather than a stronger
       | meaning.
        
       | alibrarydweller wrote:
       | "So avoid using the word 'very' because it's lazy. A man is not
       | very tired, he is exhausted. Don't use very sad, use morose.
       | Language was invented for one reason, boys - to woo women - and,
       | in that endeavor, laziness will not do. It also won't do in your
       | essays." -- The Dead Poets Society
        
         | wizofaus wrote:
         | Great movie but not the best advice - "morose" doesn't even
         | mean "very sad", it means ill-tempered/in a bad mood. I
         | wouldn't even say there is one good word that means "very sad",
         | but "morose" is definitely not it. The site in question came up
         | with "inconsolable", but that's hardly appropriate if you're
         | talking about "very sad news" (after a few attempts it come
         | back with "somber" which at least sort of works in that case,
         | though I'd still struggle to imagine myself telling a friend
         | that their divorce was "sombre news").
        
       | me_again wrote:
       | Mark Twain supposedly said:
       | 
       | Substitute 'damn' every time you're inclined to write 'very'.
       | Your editor will delete it and the writing will be just as it
       | should be.
        
         | dang wrote:
         | https://quoteinvestigator.com/2012/08/29/substitute-damn/
        
       | MisterSandman wrote:
       | Outside of writing an English essay, I don't see why the use of
       | very is looked down upon. "Very good" or "very smart" is fine and
       | is common in everyday speech.
        
         | sxg wrote:
         | One reason is because "very + <adjective>" often only vaguely
         | approximates what the writer means. "Very good" has such a wide
         | range of interpretations that it almost has no meaning. If I
         | tell you I went to a "very good" restaurant, then how was my
         | experience? Was it above average? A step beyond merely
         | acceptable? Best restaurant ever?
         | 
         | Alternatively, saying that "I went to a marvelous restaurant"
         | better indicates that my experience was exceptional.
        
         | bckygldstn wrote:
         | Very works but it's missing out on an opportunity to give more
         | detail.
         | 
         | Most of the adjectives in this app have multiple alternatives,
         | one of which is likely closer to what you're trying to
         | represent.
         | 
         | Or to put it another way: concepts like "smartness" are
         | complicated and multidimensional. Someone who is "very smart"
         | could be: good at their job, naturally intelligent, built up
         | knowledge though experience and hard work, street-smart,
         | smarter than average, smartest person in the world ever etc.
         | 
         | I wouldn't say there's always a better single word alternative
         | to "very adjective" but it's worth thinking about when writing
         | (and probably not worth thinking about in everyday speech!).
        
         | nomel wrote:
         | Big words better. How else will you immediately judge someone's
         | intellect?
        
           | DonHopkins wrote:
           | By if they say something anti-intellectual like that.
        
           | lintroller wrote:
           | Accuracy and precision is vital in communication. I agree
           | that the speaker does have a responsibility to know his
           | audience and shouldn't use fancy words to project intellect,
           | education, or status. However, if there is an opportunity to
           | be more exact, one should take it without remorse.
        
             | nicoburns wrote:
             | I would agree that accuracy is important, and sometimes
             | technical words can help with this. But all too often
             | people use big words just to sound intelligent and only end
             | up obscuring their message.
        
             | gpm wrote:
             | Accuracy and precision is sometimes vital, but modifying
             | words with very is frequently a good way of achieving that.
             | 
             | "I want a fast game", "I want a very fast game". This site
             | suggests "rapid", "breakneck", and "dashing" as
             | alternatives for "very fast". "Very fast" is pretty clear
             | very precise compared to those words. Maybe I could speak
             | about "a breakneck pace" instead, but would I have really
             | gained anything other than showing off my vocabulary?
             | 
             | Speaking of very precise, it doesn't even have a suggestion
             | for an alternative to that - though admittedly if I wasn't
             | forcing things I would have phrased that sentence as "more
             | precise than those words".
        
             | nomel wrote:
             | I agree completely. Just don't take someones plainly worded
             | communication with less value, only because it's plainly
             | worded.
             | 
             | Of course, this all falls completely apart with groups
             | containing a significant number of members with <language>
             | as a second language, where plain speech is required.
        
           | DiggyJohnson wrote:
           | I think this sort of perspective is becoming a bit of a meme.
           | Not every use of longer or uncommon words is for the sake of
           | signalling intellect or w/e. This is just such a negative,
           | juvenile perspective to take if you are deploying it often.
        
             | nomel wrote:
             | I was referring to the reverse perspective of perceiving
             | intellect, rather than signaling intellect.
             | 
             | It definitely happens both ways, but I think it's much more
             | damaging to those who are perceived as being dumb, or whose
             | ideas are not considered, because they're direct/plain.
             | 
             | I see this fairly often in meetings. Someone says something
             | very direct and plain, with the root of the problem laid
             | out, but it fails some "complexity" threshold that makes
             | the contrived, incorrect, but fancifully worded explanation
             | get more traction, eventually looping back around to the
             | simple explanation, with no real acknowledgment.
        
       | trog wrote:
       | This is missing an important factor for writing: context. There
       | are many places where it's fine to wax lyrical and reach for the
       | thesaurus. But if you're trying to write clearly and concisely
       | then there is something to be said for simplicity.
        
       | protomyth wrote:
       | _very + unique = incomparable_
       | 
       | Nice, although a rather large group of TV viewers of The West
       | Wing know that "unique means one of a kind, something can't be
       | very unique"[0]. It still amazes me how some of the quotes from
       | that show stick with me all these years later.
       | 
       | 0) https://youtu.be/Fvb1e4-YgRE?t=162 or the whole scene
       | https://youtu.be/Fvb1e4-YgRE
        
         | TrevorJ wrote:
         | The dialogue in that show was fantastic. I'd love to see more
         | shows with that particular sort of stylization. Sorkin is
         | _very_ unique.
        
       | crtified wrote:
       | When emphasising language becomes habitual, it's intended impact
       | may actually be lessened, by way of the "boy crying wolf" effect.
       | That is, if everything is described as "very" and "really" and
       | "actually", then those emphasisers no longer stand out. We start
       | to ignore them, and the collective energy spent writing them is
       | somewhat wasted.
       | 
       | So I say: let a standalone word suffice, whenever possible. Save
       | emphasis for appropriate moments.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | HL33tibCe7 wrote:
       | > very + difficult = strenuous
       | 
       | It also offered up "laborious" and "challenging". None convey the
       | actual intended meaning
        
       | kens wrote:
       | Very nice!
        
         | coding123 wrote:
         | Very charming!
        
           | daveslash wrote:
           | _Very Funny_ you two.....
        
       | imwillofficial wrote:
       | This website is the epitome of "do one thing and do it well"
       | 
       | Bravo
        
         | BarryMilo wrote:
         | I mean, the idea is interesting but I don't think it's done
         | very... well.
        
           | jordanwallwork wrote:
           | I find it frustrating that you have to click to refresh the
           | result. Why it doesnt't autorefresh after a short period
           | makes no sense to me. I kept typing in words and thinking it
           | was getting no results before realising I had to keep hitting
           | the refresh button
        
             | thayne wrote:
             | it doesn't even refresh if you hit the "enter" key on your
             | keyboard.
        
       | __derek__ wrote:
       | I expected the site to literally lose the 'very' a la Hemingway's
       | quip about ten-dollar words.
        
       | DonHopkins wrote:
       | discovery - very = disco
       | 
       | bravery - very = bra
       | 
       | delivery - very = deli
       | 
       | slavery - very = sla
        
       | powersnail wrote:
       | I've seen such advice in many writing forums (other examples
       | include don't use adverbs, don't use passive voice, etc.), and
       | while it certainly pays to heed your choice of vocabulary, I'm
       | not convinced that simply avoiding a fixed set of words or forms
       | is good advice. Let alone replacing them with a fixed set of
       | substitutes.
       | 
       | Open a few good books and essays, and see if there are adverbs,
       | "very", passive voices, or other bad forms. These are reputable
       | works written by careful and capable writers, and enjoyed by many
       | readers. If they are all deemed wrong in the eyes of such advice,
       | it's the advice that's wrong.
       | 
       | The valuable lesson is to actively _think_ about the words you
       | use, whether the text accurately convey what you mean, in the
       | tone you desire, and is readable by your intended audience.
       | 
       | I'd say a good pair of thesaurus and dictionary is much better
       | than this website. At least you got multiple candidates, an
       | explanation of each, and get to choose the most appropriate one.
        
       | thayne wrote:
       | Easy way to stump it: Take the output and put it in the input.
       | very + cute -> adorable. very adorable -> no result (may need to
       | repeat for some words).
        
         | Kiro wrote:
         | Why not just put in gibberish? Why bother using the output?
        
         | DonHopkins wrote:
         | very very => no result
         | 
         | very slightly => no result
         | 
         | very not => no result
         | 
         | ;(
        
           | version_five wrote:
           | Extremely
        
       | ruined wrote:
       | ludicrous
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | lxchase wrote:
       | Looks like you can see what adjectives are in the database at
       | this endpoint:
       | https://api.airtable.com/v0/appHLMobCaTLuVQQy/Data?api_key=k...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-10-13 23:00 UTC)