[HN Gopher] Psychiatry Wars: a lawsuit that put psychoanalysis o... ___________________________________________________________________ Psychiatry Wars: a lawsuit that put psychoanalysis on trial Author : secondary Score : 45 points Date : 2022-10-14 20:33 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.theguardian.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.theguardian.com) | luqtas wrote: | 'thousands lines' of gossip to not inform the reader about | psychoanalysis... | | which personally i hope starts to get less and less popular! | giving placebo to patients that can suicide, for me, should be | considered as homicide if recommended BEFORE any other type of | treatment with a rate greater than "eating blades of grass" and | thinking you are cured or will be cured | knaik94 wrote: | The reality is that both models work together. The amount that | each side contributes in a certain individual is dependent on | their circumstances and their genetics. | | Depression is very much a chemical thing, look into the | "comedown" recreational users of ecstasy feel after a night of | rolling. MDMA is a stimulant that also excites the same receptors | many classic antidepressants work on. MDMA effectively increases | the effectiveness of Serotonin and Norepinephrine, the effect on | Serotonin is uninhibited and is what causes the "high". After the | "dump" of Serotonin into the brain, the brain recalibrates and | the baseline Serotonin from before feels like less than it should | for a few days. The symptoms are classic anhedonia depression. | Clearly an imbalance causes depression. | | Depression is also a very situational and mental thing. The | traumatic loss of a loved one for example causes deep depression | in many people. Even a breakup after a long term relationship can | cause deep depression. Therapy and psychoanalysis can help | someone become more mindful of their thought patterns. It can | push someone to get past the immediate hurdle and regain momentum | to live a happy and fulfilling life again. | | Neither answer is complete. Trying to find a generic solution is | part of what is keeping Psychiatry closer to the blood letting | ages of medicine rather than the fMRI scan age. | | My personal experience has left me biased and jaded about the | current state and future trajectory of Psychiatry and mental | health management. Both from the medical professional side as | well as from the society side. | | It may be a cultural thing, I come from an Asian background and | my parents have hung on to that culture. I have stopped bringing | up the topic and will excuse myself from conversations when they | bring it up because when I try to speak honestly, they treat me | like I am trying to peddle. To them there is only a binary | choice, either live drug free and "clean" life or fiend for drugs | like an addict. The line isn't based on all drugs in general | either, there's a very different stigma around psychoactive vs | non-psychoactive drugs. Beta blockers for blood pressure is okay, | but beta blockers for performance anxiety and general anxiety is | not. I know it comes from a deeper belief system of not taking | mental health concerns seriously. | | Reading this article was interesting, because I didn't realize | western medicine had the same faulty starting point. | | I am lucky to have grown up in a time of computer assisted dental | x-rays. It's a culture shock knowing how recently Psychiatry was | still in the age of lobotomies. | | The US still hasn't officially banned lobotomies. The oldest | sister of President Kennedy, Rosemary Kennedy was given one in | 1941. They continued to be performed officially until the 1970s. | | The nobel prize in medicine defends the use of lobotomies and | rejects the idea of rescinding the award given to Moniz. | https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/1949/moniz/articl... | throwaway0asd wrote: | Talking about mental health is extremely challenging. On one | extreme there is stupid: the people who believe none of this | science is a form of health, or even real. On the other hand | there is the disabled: the people who likely have undiagnosed | mental health disorders themselves and are incapable of | processing any of these conversations. | | Such failures to process these vital concerns touch wide reaching | aspects of discourse from politics to work to culture generally | and that is quite a problem. | psychphysic wrote: | A key issue is also that even within mental health services | there is animosity towards psychiatry. | | Whatever one thinks of antidepressants or antipsychotics (maybe | less mood stabilizers I think), psychologists hate them. And I | think while psychiatrists see psychology as helpful for their | patients, psychologists can see the use of medications as a | failure. | | I could say more but I think I'll just leave it at that. | yamrzou wrote: | Fascinating story. Thanks for sharing. | | > Ray's mother asked the Lodge to give him antidepressants. But | to the Lodge psychiatrists the premise of this form of treatment | - to be cured without insight into what had gone wrong - seemed | superficial and cheap. Drugs "might bring about some symptomatic | relief", Ross, Ray's psychiatrist, acknowledged, "but it isn't | going to be anything solid in which he can say, 'Hey, I'm a | better man. I can tolerate feelings.'" | | I remember a HN comment from trained pharmacist | (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32103546) that argues the | same thing: "I promise you that no drug that you can take can | make any permanent changes to _edit_ your mind" | | Ray looked at two different stories about his illness, the | psychoanalytic and the neurobiological, but both "failed him". I | would say that the psychoanalytic story has a better chance of | explaining his case, but for some reason he wasn't receptive to | it. | | Relatedly, the chemical imbalance theory of depression was | disproved in a popular study published two months ago. Here is a | good summary: https://youtu.be/TZhgvr2rbwE. But SSRI are still | effective, at least in reducing symptoms. We basically don't | understand why and how they work. | 98codes wrote: | While what they're saying is true, to me it rings just as | misguided as not taking pain medicine when you have a broken | leg until it has properly set first. | | Medication for neurological issues isn't and shouldn't be the | end-all-be-all but can indeed be a way to manage the issues at | hand while teaching the tools needed to deal with the symptoms | via therapy if possible. | pessimizer wrote: | Nobody is doing studies to prove that morphine works better | than placebo. | themitigating wrote: | The effects of morphine are profound and obvious. It's like | asking for a study to prove crack does something. | knaik94 wrote: | Studies to show morphine is better than placebo in treating | what? | | Here is a link for Study protocol for a randomised, | placebo-controlled, single-blind phase II study of the | efficacy of morphine for dyspnoea in patients with | interstitial lung disease (JORTC-PAL 15) | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/5/e043156 . | | I would suggest you look into the drug approval process in | the US, I think you will learn a lot. | e40 wrote: | There are always side effects and there is a real fear by | many that they will be dependent on those drugs and have to | live with the real side effects. | hutzlibu wrote: | You can also get addicted to pain killers. They still can | help, but are surely no long term solution. | | Antidepressants fall in the same category for me, even | though I always avoided them. But if things are really | dark, I would use any tool. | haswell wrote: | I would place antidepressants under a different umbrella | - closer to insulin or other chronically required | "maintenance" medicine required to sustain life. | | Anti-depressants don't take pain away. In some cases, | they make it possible to even feel pain. | | I'm ~6 years into my therapy journey at this point and | I'm not on antidepressants at the moment, but I have been | in the past when I needed them. | | I'm fortunate that I was able to stop, and that was | partly because I put my work life on hold to go on | sabbatical and use all of my capacity on myself for | awhile. But that doesn't mean everyone can or should. | | I think it's also worth noting that especially now, | mental health issues are increasingly caused by | advancements in technology we don't yet know how to cope | with, and from which there's very little escape. | | Meds allow one to do the hard internal work that would be | significantly harder to achieve if they don't have the | capacity to keep a well functioning life up and running. | | I think only embracing one or the other exclusively is | where things start to go wrong, and what I took from the | article. | themitigating wrote: | Then it's a balance between side effects and the original | issue. | | Isn't this common knowledge and accepted? I feel like | debate makes no sense unless your motive is create more | mistrust in science | knaik94 wrote: | It's weird that we treat psychoactive drugs differently | than other drugs. We don't have a fear of a diabetic | becoming dependent on insulin or someone with high blood | pressure becoming addicted to beta blockers. There are side | effects is a bad generalization of all drugs used to treat | mental health issues. When I say I am taking beta blockers, | most people comment on how I am a bit young to be taking | them, but when I was prescribed benzos for the same | condition, everyone decided to become my doctor and tell me | what I should and shouldn't take. Endless stories about how | then knew someone who god addicted to pain killers and | became homeless and how they heard benzos are just as bad. | I chose to switch off benzos to beta blockers. | | Doctors and the patient are the best judge for the benefits | and risks of living with certain conditions vs being | medicated for them. In most cases there aren't side | effects. | anotherman554 wrote: | "It's weird that we treat psychoactive drugs differently | than other drugs. We don't have a fear of a diabetic | becoming dependent on insulin or someone with high blood | pressure becoming addicted to beta blockers." | | It not that weird. The brain is the most complicated | organ in the human body. Science understands how the | kidneys work but largely doesn't understand how the brain | works. These metaphors comparing these treatments to | kidney treatment, or whatever, are not great. | | "Doctors and the patient are the best judge for the | benefits and risks of living with certain conditions vs | being medicated for them." | | Okay, but if you were to follow this advise you should | scold anyone who says "People with mental health problems | should take drugs..." But you only scolded the person | pushing back at this statement. | renewiltord wrote: | People are pointlessly scared of drugs. When I had fractures | all over my body after a motorcycle accident, I was on | oxycodone and hydromorphone. When they operated on my hand, I | was on fentanyl. Over the next 4 weeks I stepped down the | opiates. I have some in my cupboard. I exercise zero willpower | to avoid them, though they gave me incredible relief when I was | in the hospital. Now, when I think to myself "Oh, let me try | some" the overwhelming feeling I get is not one of disgust or | of fear but of "ah man, though, I will lose maybe 4 hours of my | time to this. I really don't feel like it". | | I think if someone had given me this half-wit spiel I might | have killed myself trying to get out of my ICU bed to yell at | them. Fortunately, orthopaedic medicine is a more advanced | field than psychiatry and has a replication rate higher than | the 39% that psychiatry does. God forbid I ever encounter a | field where 60% of their science is fraudulent. Thank god my | amnesia is limited to the incident itself. | 7952 wrote: | I take SSRIs for anxiety and feel like the opportunity cost of | trying to survive without them is too great. The good things in | my life would be too disrupted by the extra load of tolerating | those feelings. And those good things are protective against | anxiety. | threatofrain wrote: | The population of depressed individuals who receive either talk | therapy _or_ pharmaceuticals do better than those who don 't | receive treatment, and those who receive _both_ do better than | those who receive only one mode of treatment. Nevertheless | modern medicine doesn 't have an adequate solution for | everyone. C'est la vie. | jbandela1 wrote: | How good are we at explaining large ML model outputs? | | My understanding is not very good? | | And that is with us having a very deep understanding of the | hardware, software, algorithms, and mathematics involved. | | Now let's suppose that you run your ML model on a computer and | you get bad results. | | Two experts show up. One says that you have a faulty memory chip | and that they can fix what is wrong with the memory chip and then | the model should work. | | The other says that because of the training data the model was | exposed to, some of the weights are bad, and by providing focused | new data for the model to train with, they can adjust those | weights so the model produces better output. | | While you are deciding, these two then get into a big fight each | accusing the other of being a charlatan. | [deleted] | [deleted] | mjburgess wrote: | I'm unsure as to the thesis of this comment: what's your point? | | Perhaps I just don't buy your premise. We understand ML models | very-well, but we don't like the explanation. Models are on a | spectrum from parametric where a data distribution is assumed, | to non-parametric, where it isnt. In the non-param case, models | largely remember compressed "averages" of historical data. | | The sense in which we dont "understand" how, eg., a NN comes to | a prediction is only in the sense that we cannot, a priori, | locate the specific subset of historical data that it has taken | a weighted average-of... but we know well that this is what its | doing. ie., something incredibly dumb and boring. | matheusmoreira wrote: | And neither of them really knows anything, they just came up | with reasonable hypotheses to explain observed behavior, | figured out what to do about them, ran tests to confirm and | then approved those treatments on the basis that they worked | more often than not. What does this stuff even do? Not sure, | they just have proof that it's effective. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-10-14 23:00 UTC)