[HN Gopher] A primer to nuclear fusion and First Light Fusion ___________________________________________________________________ A primer to nuclear fusion and First Light Fusion Author : gtzi Score : 27 points Date : 2022-10-15 19:22 UTC (3 hours ago) (HTM) web link (startuppirate.substack.com) (TXT) w3m dump (startuppirate.substack.com) | ohiovr wrote: | "There are three boxes we need to tick, in order to overcome this | repulsion I mentioned before and get the nuclei very close. And | this is not an easy feat. We need high temperature (think a | hundred million degrees), high density (have a lot of these | nuclei in a very small space), and keep the nuclei in that small | space long enough for them to "react". " | | High temperatures are usually used because the nuclei must have a | lot of force to counter that of the liked charged partner. The | most obvious way to do this is with heating the plasma because | individual particles, when they collide head on, can have the | combined momentum to plow their way together. | | But Philo T Farnsworth found a clever way to get them close with | electrostatic forces. If it weren't for those darned wires. | | With millions of degrees that plasma viciously expands. An even | more incredible contraction force must be used to keep this | together long enough for "interesting results". This is done with | inertial confinement like the Hbomb or emulations of it. Magnetic | confinement merely slows the expansion, but it must at some point | touch the walls. | | Actually, heat is not wanted. You only need to get the nuclei | close enough that they quantum tunnel to each other to relieve | their own stress in their environment. 2 Dueterons spread farther | than helium3 does. Think of it like phase changes in condensed | matter. Except we don't care at all about electrons, simply move | them somewhere that the fuel ions wish to congregate at. | Fortunately this can be a single point, as charges are | concentrated on pointy things, as Faraday found in his | experiments. The other side is full of the fuel ions. They don't | have to be hot but warming them a little in an environment that | is under 770 giga-pascals of pressure might be enough to moderate | a nuclear combination process. It isn't hard to create two | chambers in a crystal and make them undergo reductions or | oxidations to free ions or electrons (tragically this happens | with lithium ion batteries all the time). If they are surrounded | in an environment that is very hard, very good dielectric | strength, ions or electrons can be freed with no where to go. | This is known as a meta-stable state and many crystal patterns | exhibit this. The best dielectric known is diamond and it's also | the hardest and has a ton of other helpful properties. If diamond | couldn't do this, then nothing can. A mad genius with money and | time would not have to go further than it to rule it out | completely. | | Say my fancy idea doesn't work, if colliding macro projectiles is | something useful to the author have they tried something like | levitating pyrolytic carbon and propelling it with laser | ablation? It could be done in a loop if part of the magnet can | de-energize fast enough to allow the tiny block of carbon to | escape. | | The plan they have seems very Wile E. Coyote to me but fun and | cool. I hope they succeed. | raydiatian wrote: | One thing I don't understand about fusion is the mechanics of | gain factors. If we can achieve a fusion reactor with a very | small gain factor of say 1.01, is that sufficient to kick off an | energy revolution, or do we need something more extreme like 10x | or 100x? | | I suppose it boils down to what the "saturation threshold" of | nuclear reactors is, where you can't pump more energy in without | breaking the thing. | | In any case, what are the benchmarks that engineers are shooting | for? | Game_Ender wrote: | Lots of interesting fusion startups. This group is using a gun | type design that reminds of the Fat Man atomic bomb [0]. Except | here it's a fusion target hit by high speed slug causing is to | rapidly compression and undergo fusion. The key things is that | unlike the NIF they have a clear path to power extraction. In | production they are planning to use a chamber with circular | sheets of falling liquid lithium to capture the fusion neutrons | then transfer the heat [1]. Breeding some tritium along the way. | | 0 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun-type_fission_weapon | | 1 - https://firstlightfusion.com/technology/power-plan | sbierwagen wrote: | Cool idea. Capital costs would certainly be lower than any of | the magnetic confinement designs, if it works. | | The power plant design they show has a 150MWe target power. | Will be an interesting engineering challenge scaling it up and | keeping all the finicky little parts and seals in the gun | working when by design it's connected to a (small) nuclear | explosion by a long pipe. If the timing is right you could have | a heavy rotating shutter shielding the muzzle from the | backblast. | legohead wrote: | I've asked before but didn't get an answer. If we can achieve | stable fusion, what are the plans for getting the power out? | | The guy in the article said you just do the same thing as coal or | any other plant - generate steam. But we're talking about | millions of degrees vs a couple thousand. Does it really scale | that simply? | raydiatian wrote: | Haha. Stable fusion. Stable diffusion. I get it. | DennisP wrote: | Plasma temperature is high but total heat is similar to other | power plants. The atoms are moving fast but there aren't many | of them. So basically, surround the plasma with a neutron- | absorbing coolant and you're good. CFS uses molten FLiBe salt, | and some others use a molten mix of lead and lithium. Then you | run water pipes through that. | chihuahua wrote: | I'm just guessing, but I imagine if you have a way of | maintaining something at a temperature of millions of degrees, | there's always a way to transfer that heat to some other thing. | For example, by moving a gas past the very hot object, thus | heating up the gas, and then moving the gas through a more | conventional heat exchanger, where you generate steam for a | steam turbine. Depending on the speed of the gas, it absorbs | energy but isn't necessarily heated to the same temperature of | millions of degrees, so it doesn't destroy the heat exchanger. | | I think this is somewhat similar to how a fission reactor is | used to drive a steam turbine in an ordinary nuclear (fission) | power plant. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-10-15 23:00 UTC)