[HN Gopher] Does cashless society discriminate against the poor ... ___________________________________________________________________ Does cashless society discriminate against the poor and elderly? (2019) Author : maxwell Score : 74 points Date : 2022-10-17 17:21 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (blogs.ischool.berkeley.edu) (TXT) w3m dump (blogs.ischool.berkeley.edu) | bern4444 wrote: | There's a difference between cashless and technology/smartphone | only. | | You can have a cashless society that still uses checks, debit | cards, credit cards, money orders, cashiers checks, wire | transfers etc. All these can be managed or used by visiting a | local branch or with a phone call. | | Plenty of people still pay their rent with checks and I've never | been at a sit down restaurant in the US where I could pay with | Apple/Google Pay but I can of course use my CC/Debit Card. | | All of the methods listed above work without power as one | commenter suggested would be an issue. Its really not... | | Overdraft fees are egregious but they're also something you can | opt out of and is just another form of credit. | | All you need to participate to this degree is a bank account that | offers a debit card which is accessible and possible to the vast | majority of the population including the elderly - they're not | hoarding all their cash under their mattress. In the US to open | an account at any major bank is an ID and maybe an initial | deposit whether that be a cash/check/incoming transfer etc. | | It has never been easier to go to a library/school/friend's place | and sign up for a free bank account that will ship you a debit | card that will also reimburse you for ATM withdrawal fees. | | The group that should really be the focus is the underbanked - | often those less fortunate. | | Including seniors in this category of 'discrimination' feels odd | - I know of some who have no problem paying their bills, | shopping, living life etc without a smart phone or computer. | | Society can't be beholden to the past forever - progress is made | and individuals have to choose to participate if they want to use | new things that are accessible only through certain tools. | | This isn't any different from when we moved from the telegraph to | the telephone - you had to go and buy a landline to participate. | The same is true of getting a passport to fly/sail to different | countries as countries also further add requirements for updated | passports and IDs (a la Real ID requirements in the US). | Spooky23 wrote: | Yes. The assault on cash is pretty awful in general. | holoduke wrote: | I think there is a huge shadow economy with cash money only. If | I look to some people running businesses. It's quite common to | occasionally do something in cash without paying taxes on it. | Used to buy things like gasoline for boats, car restoration, | art and more. I think when this shadow economy is gone, some | people will have a harder time living a luxury life. Maybe in | the end it will be better to have this shadow world. | ghaff wrote: | I simultaneously rarely use cash and would hate to not be | able to use cash. | sneak wrote: | Use it or lose it, one might point out. | | I stopped carrying cards. | asdff wrote: | Part of it is because visa and mastercard charge these big | fees for their service that make it difficult for small | businesses to cover costs and be competitive. A few | restaurants by me that are legit brick and mortars (versus | stands), have card service, still offer a cash discount of | 4%. For stuff like food trucks or table setups on the | sidewalks, I don't blame them for going all cash and flying | under the radar from the IRS, considering how difficult it is | to establish a small business in this county and maintain | everything in order as far as the local/state/federal | government are concerned. Its almost like the laws are | designed to make it difficult unless you have a 'fixer' on | your side telling you what forms to file and how to deal with | things from the government, just based on people I know who | run businesses here and have had to use fixers themselves to | understand the byzantine tax process or other licensing | issues. | Spooky23 wrote: | Another issue is places like ticketed venues making cash-free | a term of sale. You can't buy anything with cash in places | like Citi Field or Hershey Park. | forgotmypw17 wrote: | It certainly discriminates against those without a bank account. | ncpa-cpl wrote: | Or those with bad credit. I have had two coworkers that | couldn't deposit anything to their accounts because the banks | would automatically charge their pending loans. | | One of them was a victim of identity theft in which a five | figure loan was made on her name, and the other had a legal | order due to a debt from her ex-fiancee due to a cancelled | wedding. | pb7 wrote: | > the other had a legal order due to a debt from her ex- | fiancee due to a cancelled wedding | | Hmm, working as intended? Or do you think legal judgments | should be easily avoidable? | messe wrote: | In the EU, bank accounts are considered a right. That's one | solution to it. | mdp2021 wrote: | Given PSD2, its lackings and its bad implementations, some of | us going towards the right of not having one - it is just the | right of not being involved in lunacies. | kwhitefoot wrote: | In addition it discriminates against anyone who finds themselves | even temporarily without power for their payment device whether | they are a customer or a seller. | | But as the technology gets better and more reliable this gets | rarer and rarer so that in the end it discriminates against those | who already lack a different kind of power: social and political | power. That is, the poor, the elderly, the sick, the disabled, | the poorly educated, the illiterate and innumerate, those whose | grasp of the local language is poor. I'm sure the list could be | expanded. | ncpa-cpl wrote: | > In addition it discriminates against anyone who finds | themselves even temporarily without power for their payment | device whether they are a customer or a seller. | | And makes it more difficult to anyone who is outside their | country of origin. Many payment apps are limited to residents | and nationals only, while others are avaialble on specific | country app stores. | | Like the migrant family fleeing from they country I met this | evening. They told me they were stranded here while travelling | to a better country. | | Neither her or I have banking apps that can talk to each other. | But I was able to gift him enough for dinner for his family | today. Quick interaction,from my wallet to their hand, no QR | code to be scanned, no database to be updated. | hinkley wrote: | There's a satire sketch in there somewhere about not being able | to buy a phone charger because your phone is dead. | jjslocum3 wrote: | It definitely discriminates against the Salvation Army, Buskers, | and Panhandlers. | coldtea wrote: | It also discriminates across the middle class - it enables to | nickel and dime them like never before (never mind the privacy | implication and total government control of your wallet and | purchases aspects)... | nonrandomstring wrote: | Everyone here seems to get it so there doesn't seem to be any | support for the clinical insanity that is a "cashless society" in | this thread. | | Probably preaching to the choir, but I briefly participated in a | documentary of sorts which may be of interest [1]. | | [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtM6tud8n1I | rrauenza wrote: | codelord wrote: | I can't imagine we'll have banknotes and coins in 100 years from | now. Cash is neither efficient nor environmentally friendly. The | efforts around helping the marginalized groups should be focused | on getting them a debit card not keeping cash around. | sneak wrote: | Giving the state and large corporations an unelected veto power | (without due process!) over your ability to transact is an | express train to a society without anyone having the ability to | meaningfully dissent. | | i.e. a dystopia | daveoc64 wrote: | I think we need to remove barriers to people getting access to | the technology that's needed to function in a modern society. | | In the UK, we have "basic bank accounts". These are aimed at | people with bad credit history, and offer no line of credit, but | do provide a debit card, which may also be used at an ATM. | | How are there 70 year olds today that worked throughout the 90s | and 2000s without coming across a computer? | | I do wonder if these problems will eventually fizzle out, as more | and more people have been exposed to technology throughout their | lives and will be able to use it in their old age. | | While there may be some arguments against a cashless society from | a privacy point of view, it's hard to argue with the convenience | and cost savings that you get from going cashless. | sneak wrote: | The cost savings are from cash, not cashless. Cashless systems | have the rails studded with rentseekers every step along the | way. | Nimitz14 wrote: | Not all jobs are office jobs. | prepend wrote: | My dad is 78. He retired in 95 and never used a computer. He | owns lots of them but can't use them for day to day activities, | preferring to go in person to pay bills and whatnot. | | He loves to argue about convenience or as he sees it, massive | inconvenience. | Robotbeat wrote: | One problem with cashless is it gives a ton of power to all | intermediaries, which often are duopolies. Google and Apple. | Credit card companies (Visa and Mastercard). These are able to | extract a significant sales tax ("fee") from users and shut | down accounts with little recourse. And the fact that it gives | the government power to both monitor all transactions and | immediately halt all transactions with that individual is like | a massive Big Brother capability combined with a digital | shackle that can keep anyone they want from moving. Can't use | public transit, can't use micromobility bikes, can't use taxis, | can't use airplanes, can't use your car (how do you get gas? | Pay tolls?), can't even walk far as you can't buy food. | | I remember, growing up in a more "End Times" focused | evangelical denomination, they were always talking about how | barcodes or credit cards are maybe like the "Mark of the Beast" | number in the book of Revelation, without which you can't make | any transactions. That's paranoia, of course, but it's also | kind of a good point. A fully cashless society using our | typical methods puts a massive power into the hands of the | government and a few very powerful corporations. | | It also tilts the power differential in favor of employers of | all sizes. a local small business coffee shop I frequent | doesn't pay super well, but they do tipping. The owner can | easily keep track of how much tip money comes in and uses that | as an excuse to employees that they can tolerate getting paid | only $8/hour because they have tips. The employer also has | control of the tip money that's paid in cashless form, and it's | not unheard of for employers to take some of that money or | withhold it. I prefer to use cash for more and more purchases, | but for basically all tips, I tip in cash. (And I agree tipping | in general is lame, but I don't want to punish employees for | that.) | Loughla wrote: | >How are there 70 year olds today that worked throughout the | 90s and 2000s without coming across a computer? | | Manufacturing, retail. Those are just two things that I can | name where I personally know people in their 50's who have no | real access to computers. | | >I do wonder if these problems will eventually fizzle out, as | more and more people have been exposed to technology throughout | their lives and will be able to use it in their old age. | | I bet they don't fizzle out. Technology is always changing. At | some point in their past, even the 99 year old who couldn't | turn on a smartphone today was hip on the current technology of | the day. | ghaff wrote: | You can probably tack on the fact that owning a smartphone in the | US is increasingly, if not mandatory, hard to do without. | LinuxBender wrote: | I've never witnessed this. I still do not own a smartphone. I | am actually about to activate one for the first time but I have | never needed a phone for anything other than calling or texting | someone. I admit that texting on my T9 keypad is a PITA but I | rarely text. I had a couple throw-away phones with keypads that | were nice but they are hard to find _sidekick, etc..._ | | What specific services do you depend on that require a smart | phone? | chordalkeyboard wrote: | I succumbed to the smartphone in 2019 because my university | expected it, both formally (2 factor authentication for | student email/canvas/registration account) and informally | (professor deciding to use an online quiz game as a fun way | to review material and give extra points). | | Additionally every bank has an app and some of them don't | have branches in every city so they say "just deposit checks | via mobile" | asdff wrote: | For me its two factor authentication at work. The building | was constructed in such a way that there is somehow no cell | service at all in the building. I had a smartphone all this | time but not the actual two factor app, I would have it call | my phone and do a keypress but that only worked when I was | working from home. When I go into the office, those calls | don't go through, neither does texting a list of codes. | | There are other things in life that are certainly a lot more | convenient with a smart phone. I rely on public transit, | bussing and trains, and if I didn't have a smartphone that | would make it a lot more difficult to navigate. Sure I could | pull up a paper map of the bus routes and estimate what | routing might be the most optimal to get to my destination by | hand, and call up the transit agency operator line with my | buss stop ID to ask when the next bus is slated to appear, | but its infinitely easier to just use google maps and be done | with it. When I am on the first bus and anticipating | transferring to another bus, unless I knew that bus stop ID | for the transfer point ahead of time I cannot call ahead and | know when my transfer bus is arriving, for example. | ghaff wrote: | Well, not something I use a lot but Uber/Lyft. I don't _need_ | to use my banking app but otherwise I 'd have to drive to an | ATM to deposit a check. Again, not essential, but there would | be a lot more friction when traveling than otherwise. | | (And certainly there are a lot of things on the web that are | hard to go without and I assume the typical case where | someone doesn't have a smartphone doesn't have easy access to | a computer either.) | messe wrote: | > but otherwise I'd have to drive to an ATM to deposit a | check | | Are cheques really that common in the US still? In Ireland, | and as far as I'm aware, the rest of the EU, it's rare to | see a cheque at all these days. Almost everything is paid | either on cards or some other form of electronic transfer. | rootusrootus wrote: | > Are cheques really that common in the US still? | | Not really. Happens enough that you can't call it a | surprise to see one, but they're only used in certain | niches at this point. I write a check about once a year, | for some edge case like I'm paying a contractor who | refuses to just get Venmo or equivalent. | | Even where they are used (as someone mentioned, you do | occasionally see elderly folks write them at the grocery | store) they tend to be just a slightly different version | of a debit card w/o PIN -- the stores now can instantly | run them, there's no way to float one. | messe wrote: | > they tend to be just a slightly different version of a | debit card w/o PIN -- the stores now can instantly run | them, there's no way to float one. | | That's actually the most surprising thing I've heard in | this thread. Having that ability would probably go some | way toward explaining their longevity. Like I said in | another comment, I don't even know if a grocery store / | supermarket would accept a cheque here, mostly because | they wouldn't have the ability to run them. | ghaff wrote: | Yeah. I don't know the details and I very rarely see them | in stores. But there's some sort of system that, as | parent says, basically immediately locks the funds so (as | I understand it), there's no risk to the store. | | I assume things like car dealerships use the system as | well. When I bought a car recently I just gave them a | personal check which they were fine with. In the past I | had to go to my bank and get a cashier's check. | | You don't even generally see signs about returned check | fees these days. | | They're not super-common in general for _most_ use cases | but they 're still the most straightforward way to make | personal payments (other than in-person cash payments) | without going through _some_ process that 's more | involved than giving someone a piece of paper. | [deleted] | alistairSH wrote: | Yes, sadly they're pretty common. My wife's side business | is almost always paid with a check. I regularly, but not | frequently, receive doctors bills or similar without | online payment options, so I have to write ~12 | checks/year. My housekeeper doesn't accept Paypal/Venmo, | so she's paid with a check as well. Sane for some random | laborers (lawn, paint) who are working by word of mouth | (and not employed by a larger firm). And it's pretty | common for elderly people to use them to pay for | groceries. | | I guess my counter-question is what does the rest of the | world do for doctors bills or paying laborers who don't | accept payment via Paypal/Venmo? | warp wrote: | Here in Ecuador it's mainly cash, but it's becoming more | common to just do a normal bank transfer from a mobile | phone. The banking app of my bank here (Pichincha) has a | built-in option to share the payment as a .jpg via | Whatsapp (or any messaging app) as a sort of confirmation | to the recipient. | | In the Netherlands banking apps let you create "Payment | Requests", which is basically a URL you can share with | someone to have them pay you (you can pre-fill the amount | they need to pay). Typically, if you open such an URL on | your phone, it will let you jump into your banking app of | _your_ bank to make the actual payment (even if the | payment request is from a different bank than the on | you're using). | messe wrote: | > And it's pretty common for elderly people to use them | to pay for groceries. | | Interesting. I'm not even sure a grocery store / | supermarket would accept a cheque here. | | > My housekeeper doesn't accept Paypal/Venmo, so she's | paid with a check as well | | Here it'd be either cash in hand, or a bank transfer | (same as rent, really). All you need is their IBAN | (International Bank Account Number) and BIC (Bank | Identifier Code), and most mobile banking apps will let | you set up a monthly direct debit. You can sometimes run | into issues if their bank account is in a different | country to the bank you're transferring from--it's | unlawful to discriminate between IBANs in different | countries, although it tends to goes unpunished--but | there's usually workarounds to that. | alistairSH wrote: | _same as rent, really_ | | Also frequently paid by check. | | _All you need is their IBAN (International Bank Account | Number) and BIC (Bank Identifier Code), and most mobile | banking apps will let you set up a monthly direct debit._ | | What is this dark magic?!?! lol. The US is comically | awful at consumer banking. | messe wrote: | And actually just to add to the last question of your | comment. We'd also pay for doctors bills by either cash, | card, or direct debit. Healthcare in Ireland isn't | perfect (long waiting times--but you can go private for | quicker care), but it's relatively cheap (free under a | certain income, in the cases of certain long-term medical | conditions, and above a certain age), and heavily | subsidized. | | My sister recently had a stay in hospital, and then later | an emergency room visit. As far as I'm aware, it all | totaled less than EUR200 (half of which will be refunded | by insurance, and another 20% of the remainder as a tax | credit), which was all paid for partially by card (to the | GP who referred us to the hospital), and partially by | bank transfer (to the hospital). | ghaff wrote: | Common enough. Ignoring the ones that I never see because | my bank writes and delivers them for me, I still | periodically get payments for things like FSA as a check. | I also write maybe a couple dozen a year for various home | service stuff. | | (That said, I probably only _deposit_ 5 or 6 checks a | year. So putting them in an ATM at the bank wouldn 't be | a horrible inconvenience. And they are getting less and | less common.) | iso1631 wrote: | Still exist in the UK. I had to cash a cheque a few years | ago, very amusing having to get my bank to send me some | book of paper to do so. | messe wrote: | I mean, they still exist here in Ireland, my biological | grandmother sent me one last christmas; it's still | sitting on my desk and I haven't gotten around to cashing | it. | tobias_smollett wrote: | If your grandmother balances her checking account every | month, it's extra work for her to have outstanding | checks. Also, people at the poverty level often don't | know how much money they have to spend for the month | until their rent and utility payments are deducted from | their account. (they don't do math) | ghaff wrote: | They may also not be cashable after some length of time | like 90 days. | messe wrote: | > Also, people at the poverty level [..] (they don't do | math) | | I'm sorry, but what the fuck sort of paternalistic and | defeatist attitude toward education is that? | | EDIT: I would like to apologize, I swore in my previous | edit of this comment. I did not swear enough. Seriously | what the absolute fuck sort of attitude is that toward | people and swearing? | theodric wrote: | 'I like to use' is not the same as 'mandatory.' You can | call a taxi, you can beg a lift, you can hitchhike, you can | walk, you can drive. | | The Netherlands has a supermarket (Marqt) which does not | accept cash. Thankfully, there are alternatives. Marqt is | also so expensive that you're either a yuppie with a debit | card or can afford to pay a shopper if you're getting your | food there. | LinuxBender wrote: | _Uber /Lyft_ | | Ah, that makes sense. I've never used those. I've used taxi | cabs but maybe I am missing out or paying more than I | should. | nobody9999 wrote: | >I've never used those. I've used taxi cabs but maybe I | am missing out or paying more than I should. | | At least in my experience, you're not doing either of | those things. | duderific wrote: | Uber/Lyft are so much more reliable than a standard taxi. | Before the ridesharing apps, I'd had several experiences | of trying to call a taxi company to come pick me up (this | is in San Francisco). It never arrived after repeated | calls to the dispatcher, saying "it's on the way." If | they're overbooked, they simply ignore the requests and | you have no remedy other than to call another taxi | company, which is likely similarly impacted. | morpheuskafka wrote: | That seems rather circular. By definition Uber is a | (supposedly) improved taxi service built on mobile | computing/data service. If you were transported back in | time before smartphones were common/socially essential, | Uber wouldn't exist at all. | | That would be like an older person complaining they "have | to have a smartphone" to see pictures of their grandkids, | when it's actually the other around. Because smartphones | exist, they can see pictures they otherwise would not have | seen at all because no one would have driven to the store, | printed them out, and mailed them (or had a camera to take | them with) without that technology. | | Contrast that to something like parking, where using a | phone app provides convenience and decreased operating | costs, but the service itself is in no way dependent on | people having phones. | ghaff wrote: | >Contrast that to something like parking, where using a | phone app provides convenience and decreased operating | costs, but the service itself is in no way dependent on | people having phones. | | Well, if you can no longer pay for something that you | used to be able to pay for with coins, you've lost | something with a smartphone requirement. | | Otherwise I get your argument but, if instead of | smartphone, you say computer--now say that you don't | _really_ need a computer. You can phone people on your | landline but many people won 't pick up. OK, you can't | use Amazon but there are local stores you can get to. And | so forth. At some point, it's probably not like you'll | starve but you're cut off from a lot of modern | interaction. | yerich wrote: | Being able to call an Uber or Lyft when I need it has made it | much easier to live without a vehicle. I have tried to call a | cab company using the phone before, but even they have | transitioned to using apps for dispatch now. | JumpCrisscross wrote: | Would add airports. If I'm not checking a bag, I can walk | straight to security, do an iris scan at CLEAR and show my | digital boarding pass to security and at the gate. | | That said, there _are_ manual workarounds to almost | everything requiring a smartphone. They're simply less | efficient. | asdff wrote: | OTOH it only takes you thirty seconds to transmute your | confirmation number into a paper boarding pass at the | check in stations, which are empty now that everyone uses | apple/android wallet. Maybe that would actually be better | even if you have a smartphone, if you are concerned about | battery life or roaming charges. | ghaff wrote: | In the US--I can't speak to CLEAR--but even with TSA Pre | you have to show your ID. (I'm not sure they've even | looked at my boarding pass when I've flown recently. I | assume the computers are correlating my ID with the | flight reservation in the system.) | | If I can conveniently print out a boarding pass either at | home or at the airport I tend to do so. That way I'm not | fiddling with my phone when I don't need to. | | (I think I've seen it the other way around in London at | least.) | messe wrote: | > I can walk straight to security, do an iris scan at | CLEAR | | I'm sorry, what? Outside the US I just show my boarding | card prior to going through security. I'm pretty sure my | ID doesn't get checked until I board the plane, so | hearing that you show biometrics is a bit jarring. | | I was in the US a few weeks ago, but I can't remember if | I had to show ID when going through security on leaving. | I tend to work on autopilot when navigating airports. | morpheuskafka wrote: | It's been a while since I have flown anywhere, but I | don't think we check ID at the gate here? So it's not | really any better or worse, it's just at a different | point in the process. | messe wrote: | You might be right. I'll be honest, my approach to | airports and flying is to have a few drinks once I get | past security and then sleep my way as best I can through | the flight. I can't remember if my passport was checked | when I boarded on leaving Seattle. | soupfordummies wrote: | Another example: parking. | | There are numerous streets that dont have meters now and just | a sign to "pay on this parking app" | macintux wrote: | Yeah, I was thrilled when the parking app I signed up for | to use once while I was visiting Chicago was hacked. | AndrewUnmuted wrote: | Nashville's parking situation went from "annoying" to | "impossible" thanks to this garbage. | tengbretson wrote: | Obviously not essential, but NFL tickets no longer have a | paper option. It is app-only. | tobias_smollett wrote: | The world cup in Qatar requires a specific app to manage | your tickets. I really hope U.S. sports don't go down this | route. | intrepidhero wrote: | Went to restaurant yesterday without paper menus. Just a QR | code on the table that redirects to the website. | ncpa-cpl wrote: | Some restaurants link to their non-optimized printing | quality PDF. A few restaurants have made me download a 20 | MB PDF, sometimes, while consuming my small and expensive | roaming package. | messe wrote: | > while consuming my small and expensive roaming package. | | I'm curious. Do you get roaming charges having cross | state-lines in the US, or do you have a nation-wide data | package? Here in the EU, I'm on a plan that gives me | unlimited data anywhere in europe, for around 30EUR a | month. | monocasa wrote: | Roaming isn't really correlated to political boundaries | like state lines here in the US. It tends to be when | you're in a rural area that only a competing service has | bothered to put up towers in. | ghaff wrote: | I haven't seen this for quite a few years but I use one | of the major carriers. I assume it may still happen with | more budget options in the US. | tobias_smollett wrote: | I've also seen where you have make your order on the | website and then they deliver it to your table. I'm not | sure if there was even any other way to order and pay. | bombcar wrote: | The local grocery store now has their coupons in an app _only_ | which has for certain reduced some people's ability to use | them. | | Another store has online only coupons and just killed using | checks, too. They do have a free ATM at least. | [deleted] | trylfthsk wrote: | I think there almost needs to be a "Reacher Law", in that there | should be minimal friction to participating in society aside from | maybe cash and an ID. I definitely find a default assumption of | having a smartphone that's creeping in everywhere (android / iOS | compatible & has an active data plan) to be increasingly cloying. | | Currently, all I can do is politely decline and insist that I | neither have the Play nor Apple store; I still find it | uncomfortable even giving away my phone number. I couldn't even | get into my gym the other day, since they'd transitioned to app | sign-in only (phasing out barcode tags); I'm forced to beg the | attendant to look me up by phone number _every time_. | | *EDIT: I hope ranting about smartphones in a cashless-ness thread | isn't too off topic | ghaff wrote: | >I hope ranting about smartphones in a cashless-ness thread | isn't too off topic | | I don't think so. Certainly it's hard to argue that _at least_ | a feature phone that you 're willing to give out the phone | number for is well-nigh mandatory. | | As you say, go back not that many years and cash/travelers | checks and appropriate ID (drivers license and/or passport) | were really all you needed in general. In addition to phone, | it's really hard without a credit card today as well. | splitstud wrote: | sneak wrote: | I live in two countries, "I just got back to the country and | don't have a sim card with a US number yet" is a high status | "I'm never giving you my fucking phone number". For me it has | the benefit of being true a lot of the time. | loceng wrote: | I could see something reasonable being a surcharge for allowing | access to an "archaic" system - however then that fee should be | subsidized to the business, by the centralized organizations, | as such "archaic" systems are necessary mechanisms to counter | potential tyranny-captured of centralized systems by very bad | actors. | rkagerer wrote: | Completely on-topic. Phone-based identification is armed with | too much capability inside the black box and limited means for | the user to have a clue what is being leaked to whom. | hinkley wrote: | I think there was just a thread here last week about how | homeless people get their stuff stolen or lost all the time. | 2 Factor keeps people out when you can't reliably Bring | Something. | | I don't generally want to say that too loud though because | some politician will point out that they still have their | eyes and fingertips so why can't we use biometrics instead. | janalsncm wrote: | 99.9% of people have eyes and fingertips. If we're going to | require eye/fingertip authentication to function in society | we need to solve for that last 0.1% as well. | krolden wrote: | Ive been doing some IT work at a cell phone store in a very low | income area. There is a large number of people coming in to buy | new phones or get their old ones repaired and many of them | (especially the older ones) HATE that they need to have a | smartphone. I hear at least one person a day complain about how | they cant just have a normal land line anymore and need to have | a smartphone to participate in society. | | Also they REALLY dont like hearing about how the phone they | have now is obsolete and theres no way to get parts for it, or | its just too far gone and they'll need to buy a new phone. I | feel for all of these people as I totally agree with them. | deltree7 wrote: | Am I the only one who sees the hypocrisy in the ranter and | general sympathy from HN code towards them. | | "Normal Land Line" wasn't something that came from nature. It | is a sophisticated technology invented by humans with the | same User Interface flaws and Laggard-Ranting that every | generation goes through. | | When Mixed-Reality becomes popular, I'm sure there will be | many complaining "why can't I just have simple smartphone" | and there will probably some Gen Zers sympathizing with them | and reminiscing about the simple days of smartphone. | | Newsflash: Adaption and Evolution is the name of the game. I | can understand if a disabled person complains inability to | use gadgets(although smartphones have better accessibility | features), but you can bet your bottom dollar, most of these | people whine because they aren't curious about the world and | stubbornly refuse to adapt and the rest of the world has to | bend over backwards to accommodate them? | macintux wrote: | A phone book and a touchtone (or even rotary) phone is | _exponentially_ cheaper, simpler and easier to maintain | than a smartphone. | | Yes, it's also exponentially more powerful, but it leaves a | lot of people behind. | chrisseaton wrote: | That's because when they were young a 'normal land line' was | the state of the art tech. Why were they fine using state of | the art tech then? I guess older people at the time found it | confusing and the people complaining to you probably thought | they should get with the times. | | It's the same stuff just in a cycle. | azalemeth wrote: | Landlines were state-of-the-art tech more than a century | ago; depending on when you define its invention it came at | some point between 1844 and 1877 [1] and it was widespread | by the second world war. There was a huge portion of the | last century in which "just" having a landline was a | relatively constant, relatively well defined utility and | (from the consumer's point of view) the technology was | mature and did not change much between arguably 1950 and | about 1990. The rotary dial pulse dialling system was | patented in 1891; the telephone I grew up using (in the | 1980s) used essentially the same technology and pulse | dialling gradually replaced it over the course of several | decades. Most of the innovation took place on the side of | the exchange, and the average telephone user probably | noticed little other than changes in billing and a slowly | decreasing frequency of talking to an operator. | | Cellphones are completely different. My "daily driver" | smartphone, bought in 2017 for ~1/4 of my monthly salary, | is obsolete and I have rooted it in order to continue to | install security updates. This _has_ locked me out of my | Danish bank account. | | My mum's 1980s PSTN phone still works, even when the mains | electricity is out, no technology change required. | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_telephone | [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulse_dialing | chrisseaton wrote: | > Landlines were state-of-the-art tech more than a | century ago | | And they were state-of-the-art until the late 1990s, when | mass consumer mobile phones became a thing. | | You can either be stubborn about tech, or adopt a grown- | mindset and learn about new things. | | Their generated developed this technology - it can't be | beyond them to learn it? | | > My mum's 1980s PSTN phone still works | | Well it doesn't for much of society - that's the point. | JamesianP wrote: | They had T1 and ISDN at least since the 70s. | | The landline is special because laws require a line- | powered phone system that can survive outages. It's a | minimal and reliable layer of infrastructure people which | still makes perfect sense for people with limited | communications needs. | azalemeth wrote: | > You can either be stubborn about tech, or adopt a | grown-mindset and learn about new things. > Their | generated developed this technology - it can't be beyond | them to learn it? | | My point is that, actually, _no_ : nobody alive predates | the popularisation of the telephone (the oldest person | listed as being alive at the moment was born in 1904 - by | which point there were ~3 m telephone subscribers in the | US [1] https://www.technofunc.com/index.php/domain- | knowledge/teleco...). | | I think the point about being resistant to learning new | skills is one thing, extreme poverty and the historically | _incredibly_ rapid widespread adoption of the smartphone | is another. A smartphone from ten years ago is as good as | useless for banking nowadays. If you 're an 80 year old | pensioner on a fixed income, it may well both be a | significant proportion of your income, have taken a long | time to learn to use and not exactly be understanding of | your (statistically quite likely to be present) visual or | fine manual dexterity difficulties, and I can very much | imagine that you feel locked out of society for no good | reason. | chrisseaton wrote: | > nobody alive predates the popularisation of the | telephone | | I didn't claim that. I said it was the state-of-the-art | until recently, and it was. | | But I know what you mean. | | (Except newer smart phones tend to have better support | for accessibility as people realise it's more important.) | hinkley wrote: | I wonder how they'd react if I started bitching about having | to have a car to participate in society. | AndrewUnmuted wrote: | [deleted] | kgermino wrote: | I'd posit it's quickly getting easier to live without a car | than without a smartphone in the US. | | Plus, even if you live in an area where a car is required | you have the option to opt out and move (housing crisis | aside), which isn't an option to avoid smartphone | requirements. | chrsig wrote: | well, you could always move somewhere very rural with | poor cellphone reception. | hinkley wrote: | The people complaining about smart phones and the people | who created the car-obsessed society are substantially | the same people. | milsorgen wrote: | I've made it to my late 30s only owning a car for maybe 2 | or 3 of those years. I've never felt the desire, my mom | always commented it was odd back when I was a teenager... | But I digress, it is very possible and it's easier than | ever. I grew up on the rural west coast, moved inland to an | agricultural area. Never living in a proper city by most | metrics. Certainly I've missed some opportunities along the | way, c'est la vie, but it is easier than ever and I'm | meeting more and more people like me as time goes on. I | also don't have a photo ID as a general rule, but that's a | whole different can of worms and in some cases much more | limiting than living car free. Most people seem to create | their own hurdles or embiggen real ones that they do face, | certainly I do in my own ways so don't take that as a | judgement just an observation. Choosing to go carless is | not half the hurdle many people perceive it to be. | A4ET8a8uTh0 wrote: | It may sound odd, but you are not bolstering your argument | here. The parent is arguing for a way to ensure that | participation in society is not bound by one's ability | arrange for unrelated physical objects other than cash and | ID to participate. And that is before we even get to how | much having a car and cell phone governs one's life in US. | Not everyone believes it is a good societal structure. | | Note that I am not arguing one way or another, but outright | dismissal is not an appropriate counter argument. | hinkley wrote: | Oh I'm not saying either is good. I'm saying that the | shoe is on the other foot now. | fabianhjr wrote: | Public Transit (from local buses to inter-city trains) | should be high quality and frequent. | | That is reality in a lot of the world including Europe, | China, and South America. | | I agree with the sentiment of not generally needing to have | a car and fortunately that is the case in most of the world | (except the USA) | andrepd wrote: | In _part_ of Europe, China, and South America. | redavni wrote: | >I couldn't even get into my gym the other day, since they'd | transitioned to app sign-in only (phasing out barcode tags) | | If it is QR code based, take a screenshot or picture of the QR | code. I just login with the photo app anymore lol. | Findecanor wrote: | Very on topic. Here in Sweden cashless payments using | smartphones have largely replaced cash for person-to-person | transactions. | | The proprietary payment app in turn relies on a proprietary app | for electronic ID which authorises bank transactions. And those | demand a relatively recent version of iOS or Android and that | the phone is not rooted. The e-ID is only available to citizens | and residents, which means that people such as foreign students | or guest workers can't get one. (And then the privacy and | security issues of the e-ID system is a can of worms...) | azalemeth wrote: | It's the same in Denmark. I get charged extra by the bank for | using cash and others look at me weird. I have a rooted | Android phone and am privacy mad. Most Danes think I'm a | weird foreigner (which, to be fair, I am!) | delecti wrote: | Conversely, loads of places in Germany don't even accept | card payments. I go there occasionally for work and can't | easily avoid getting at least some cash to make it through | the week. | jedimastert wrote: | > aside from maybe cash and an ID | | I get and fully support what you're going for, but friendly | reminder that (in America) having an ID can actually be | somewhat difficult in a variety of circumstances where people | are most vulnerable to being left out. It's actually kind of a | hot button issue | motohagiography wrote: | It discriminates against everyone except the minority of public | administrators it ensconces. It literally removes the discretion | and ownership of money if you cannot physically possess it. It | polarizes people involved in grey market transactions into a | permanent underclass who cannot escape it, and just partial | cashlessness has been used within the last several or so hours to | disenfranchise political opposition. That it is being discussed | seriously at all is an offensively false equivalence. The only | people who are "cashless" in a cashless society are the citizens | from whom the cash is taken. | | The arguments back like, "I have nothing to hide," or, "cards are | just convenient," aren't centerist or neutral, they are the banal | nihilism of people suited to scheduling prison trains, imo. | post-it wrote: | I agree. I personally prefer paying by card 100% of the time, | but cash should always be an option. I think it's fine for cash | to be a little less convenient - when paying for gas, for | example, the pump might only take card, and if you want to pay | by cash you have to go into the store. Or a store may not be | able to provide exact change and that's fine. | sneak wrote: | I always like to remind people "when you pay with your card, | you help finance the forever war". | bombcar wrote: | Cash is so simple a four year old can understand it. | | Everything else may be more convenient in various ways, but it's | more complicated, too. And with unexpected things that can | happen. | pbhjpbhj wrote: | [X] doubt | | Inasmuch as they can understand a payment card equally well. | They don't understand acquisition of [cash] money, but equally | don't understand why the magic plastic rounded-rectangle works. | They can use a payment card more easily than cash in my limited | experience (as a parent and uncle). | bombcar wrote: | My kids at least understand that "a dollar" can be exchanged | for "good or services" and that if they want more they have | to find another dollar. They haven't quite grasped that a | coin isn't as good as a dollar, or that a 1 and a 10 are | different. | | A payment card would seem to either be magic (it always | works!) or confusingly not consumed in its use but still not | work again later (gift card). | Robotbeat wrote: | Yeah, my kids understand physical money and use it to buy | ice cream from the ice cream man (the primary use of | physical money for allowance). | ghaff wrote: | And more brittle, in at least _some_ ways, as well. When I | travel, especially internationally, I try to be prepared so | that I wouldn 't be completely screwed if my phone decided to | die on me. Of course, stuff can always happen like your bag | being snatched but I try to be in a position at least to deal | with an electronic device just crapping out. | tobias_smollett wrote: | My credit card had a fraud block put on it because I tried to | make a large payment while out of the country (Thanks for | nothing Capital One). Even after they accepted the payment a | few days later I still had to jump through many hoops to get | the card unblocked. I now think 3 credit cards plus a bunch | of cash is the minimum when traveling out of the country. | bombcar wrote: | Some credit cards let you put a travel itinerary in their | records, to reduce the chance of this happening (if I | recall correctly, American Express will do it for you | automatically, so if you buy a plane ticket to Rome, | they'll know charges from Italy are probably good). | | But yes, multiple SEPARATE funding sources and cash are a | minimum when traveling, even within the US imo. | maccard wrote: | Multiple bank accounts, even if you operate primarily | with cash, are a requirement for normal living. You | always want a backup, preferably isolated from the | original. | ghaff wrote: | Agree. | | There is a sufficient hair trigger on fraud alerts these | days that you _really_ need a diversified set of cards when | traveling--especially internationally. And, yes, get some | cash though in post-COVID travel world I 'm probably now | stuck with a bunch of random foreign cash I'm never going | to spend. (Pounds/Euros I can deal with but a bunch of | other smaller currencies I doubt I can easily exchange.) | | Travel notifications can help. But I've even had random | declines for $20 purchases at US gas stations. | asdff wrote: | A good way to always have cash while travelling is to get a | belt wallet. You will get mugged for your phone and your bag | and what they presume to be your actual wallet, but they | aren't going to ask for your belt or even whatever you might | have shoved into your sock. | mindslight wrote: | Unfortunately TSA generally makes you remove your money | pouch when they're feeling up your genitals, making it so | everyone can see that you have a money pouch. Yet another | way the Orwellian-named agency makes individual travelers | less secure. | asdff wrote: | They might make you remove your belt but they won't open | the belt up or anything like that. Plus you probably | won't be mugged at the airport itself or make yourself | much of a target beyond everyone else putting a $2000 | laptop on the conveyer belt. | Robotbeat wrote: | I sometimes have removed my ID or credit card from my | wallet while going through TSA and I just kept it in my | fingers (visible to them) while getting Terahertz scanned | or going through metal detectors, so it never left my | person. Protecting against the small risk of it being | stolen during the process of X-raying my belongings and | recovering them. | ghaff wrote: | Yeah. Most places I wouldn't bother but there are | circumstances where that's good advice--though I'd probably | actually use something where I could tuck in a spare credit | card. | JoeAltmaier wrote: | Some places in Africa, you get paid in 'minutes' on your phone. | Some app lets you transfer this credit, and thus it's used as | some sort of cashless payment. | | If I remember it right. | | So anyway it seems the article's question can be answered with a | resounding No! if folks in Africa see this as cheaper than | ordinary currency. | jabroni_salad wrote: | Africa had this running via SMS on flip phones over a decade | ago, no app needed. You didn't have payment terminals much of | anywhere outside the big cities, so that's just how electronic | payments on the ground tended to work. | ghaff wrote: | The experience in Africa and Asia does seem to suggest that, | like it or not, many people who are clearly poor appear able to | deal with cashless transactions just fine. Of course, arguably | it's become more the norm in some places (and maybe cash is | more problematic) so people just deal with it. | beambot wrote: | Quite literally equating time & money... | isaacremuant wrote: | Yes. Absolutely. It also is more error prone and a dangerously | distopic way for governments or corporations to target an | individual since governments only seem to get stronger through | surveillance and the codification of emergency powers that become | permanent. | | I love the convenience but it needs to be an option, not an | obligation. | samsquire wrote: | If I could pay for something completely with something I know and | not what I have. I would feel I could leave my house without keys | and without a phone or bank card. | | So need some form of secure identity that can scale and be secure | even on insecure terminals. | | Perhaps a combination of password, mobile phone number, PIN and | email. Then you could verify the transaction with the email or | phone. But you could also opt to not use phone and email for a | less attestation that you transacted. | ghaff wrote: | You can often pay with something you wear (with Apple Pay). But | I would never depend on it so I do carry a small wallet. And I | need keys for my car (which is probably just as well). | jleyank wrote: | Cashless, lessee: | | - barter economy when the power or network or website goes down. | | - all transactions tracked. | | - can have your money disabled by a 3rd party. | | - transaction fees, particularly when traveling internationally. | | - magnetic fields suck. Plastic gets brittle. | LinuxBender wrote: | Adding to this: | | - As more banks participate in ESG and experiment with what | they can get away with, people may lose access to their funds | if they hold the wrong beliefs or lack good social credit | score. This is already in place in China and all the big banks | are looking at dipping their toes into this game. | | PayPal already experimented with this and back-peddled when | their stock dipped as a result. A few dozen big banks in the US | are now participating in ESG. Only time will tell what they | dare to implement. | RichardCNormos wrote: | You only have to look as far as Canada to see this in action. | Canada leveraged banks for political revenge this year: | https://yesithappened.substack.com/p/canada-froze-bank- | accou... | Ruthalas wrote: | What is 'ESG' in this context? | klyrs wrote: | "Discriminating" against the oil industry | [deleted] | peyton wrote: | Strangely the oil industry is doing great. And their ESG | metrics look great, too. | [deleted] | LinuxBender wrote: | ESG's are environmental, social, and governance metrics. It | is a method of altering the behavior of businesses and | individuals through incentives or in some cases | disincentives. Rather than altering group and individual | behavior through legislation, banks and financial | institutions can alter the behavior of businesses and | people using a social credit score. | | The legislators of my state and several other states are | actively fighting banks that exhibit this behavior. None of | the small banks I interact with will ever participate in | that concept. | | [1] - https://www.heartland.org/publications- | resources/publication... | version_five wrote: | This is bang-on. We're seeing daily examples of companies | forcing their "values" on users, and it's most acute in big | monopolies. It's fine to debate whether people should be | kicked off twitter (they can just build their own lol), but | depriving people of money in retaliation is a whole other | level, only seen in places like Canada | Asraelite wrote: | > only seen in places like Canada | | Did you mean China, or is there something that happened in | Canada that I'm not aware of? | TeeMassive wrote: | They froze the bank accounts of some Freedom Convoy | donors. | | The worse part of it is that some are denying that it | happened, even though the Deputy Prime Minister made an | official announcement about it. | DerekL wrote: | > - magnetic fields suck. Plastic gets brittle. | | The chips in credit cards aren't damaged by magnetic fields. | Mag stripes will eventually be discontinued. (For instance, | cards from Mastercard won't have mag stripes after 2033.) | pb7 wrote: | Cash can get lost, stolen, or damaged. It is especially a risk | when you're bringing a bunch of cash for an international trip. | | > transaction fees, particularly when traveling internationally | | Many banks offer no international transaction fee cards. | Charles Schwab Checking is one such example. | | > magnetic fields suck. Plastic gets brittle | | Cash is filthy disgusting and deteriorates. Also risk of | receiving counterfeit bills. | mdp2021 wrote: | Details. | | "Cash-less" society means loss of anonymity. | | The matter is not with options, but with lack of options. | influxmoment wrote: | Happen to HK protesters. Antigovt democracy protests can be | tracked participating in protests through credit card use | TEP_Kim_Il_Sung wrote: | Everything that was bad about Corporate Scrip, is bad about | cashless. | anonporridge wrote: | Cash is just nation state scrip. | | And the nation state is just the corporation with the local | monopoly on violence. | MikusR wrote: | Money is made from plastic | mindslight wrote: | The fundamental problem with this regressive "discrimination" | framework is that it divides people into a dichotomy of "having | agency" and "having no agency", and then focuses the analysis on | those with no agency while ignoring the concerns of those with | agency. Essentially it asks the wrong question, stands in for | real discussion about societal problems from such things, and | allows real issues to be handwaved away as those with agency just | needing to choose to "get with the program". | | I am 100% dead set against "cashless society", not because I am | "unable" to use anything else, but because it is less private, | less empowering, and outright less convenient. Sure, I'll | sometimes give in to the financial surveillance industry to get | money back, or to make returns easier, or to do online purchases, | or to avoid trading fomites during Covid. But ideally I want to | transact in cash. Make the decision to spend a given amount of | money exactly once, and not suffer the same transaction multiple | times as I see my agglomerated statements at the end of the | month. | | With friends, no fucking Paypal, Venmo, Zelle, or whatever fly by | night crap is popular this week that undoubtably forces some | nonconsentual "terms" at me. Never mind creating yet another | insecure account that has to be checked every month lest I end up | responsible for a company's negligence. Cash - we settle and then | we forget about it. Sometimes it's higher, sometimes it's lower, | most of the time it evens out, sometimes it doesn't but we assume | it does and move on with our lives. | | Like maaaaaybe in the far future if phones are ever personal | computing devices that represent individuals, and we have the | security properties granted by systems like Monero, and software | designed for end users and not surveillance companies, then I'd | be happy to settle with digital money. But it's foolish to jump | the gun and pretend that any of the junk currently being pushed | by surveillance companies represents that sort of idyllic future | in any way. | asdff wrote: | I think another big problem with digital versus paper money is | that you can't just transmute money from cash to cashless | without you having an institution involved along the way. I | can't take a picture of a dollar bill and add it to my venmo | account, unless I go buy a venmo gift card from a merchant, or | I open an account with a bank and deposit the cash through | their physical bank branch or an ATM network they've partnered | with. Even with crypto, you are relying on some other | institution like the echange or the bitcoin ATM or whatever to | turn that dollar bill into a digital currency. | kepler1 wrote: | > _Does cashless society discriminate against the poor and | elderly_? | | Of course it does. But so did society that started adopting the | telephone, or automobiles, for people who didn't have money to | buy telephones or cars, or didn't want to get on board the | technological change. And what doesn't discriminate against poor | people, by the way? The poor are always getting the short end of | the stick. You come up with ways to help them, but railing | against a new technology because it disadvantages some has never | worked. | | I'm not saying I'm in favor of cashless, but whatever the | technology is, life adopts it and moves on. People have to deal. | Or they die and get replaced with people who do. You will never | get 100.000% of the people on something that takes away what you | used to rely on. | clord wrote: | I'm running into this. A family member is in the hospital, but | she took care of all the bills and whatnot. Her husband is having | a very hard time figuring out how to pay bills, etc. I've been | helping him out but the situation is teaching me how hard it is | to do things for someone outside of technology these days. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-10-17 23:00 UTC)