[HN Gopher] A lot of what is known about pirates is not true (2017)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       A lot of what is known about pirates is not true (2017)
        
       Author : Thevet
       Score  : 83 points
       Date   : 2022-10-18 17:54 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.neh.gov)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.neh.gov)
        
       | jtbayly wrote:
       | You mean they don't laugh and jump off of things?
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | vlunkr wrote:
       | It makes sense that pirates like Blackbeard dominate our view of
       | pirates and probably distort it significantly. They were
       | intentionally going for shock value and it obviously worked.
       | 
       | Much like dinosaurs and knights, this brand of pirates is very
       | appealing to kids, so we're kind of stuck with them.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | handedness wrote:
         | The same could also be said for the Wild West, and even the
         | greater Old West period in general.
        
           | jasonwatkinspdx wrote:
           | It's interesting how genre fads have come and gone in the
           | Hollywood era. For a while there swashbucklers with Errol
           | Flynn et all were the biggest thing ever. Now that along with
           | westerns are nearly a dead genre.
        
       | DonHopkins wrote:
       | Expected the article to be about BitTorrent users.
        
       | ankaAr wrote:
       | I remember reading an history book about pirates when I was very
       | young, from ancient history to modern days. How I loved it..
       | 
       | I will try to remember the name of the German author.
        
       | realce wrote:
       | https://piratehistorypodcast.com/
        
       | Andrew_nenakhov wrote:
       | Ok, I'll say it: contrary to popular belief, people who engage in
       | unauthorized copying of files _are not pirates._
        
         | WalterBright wrote:
         | Words change meaning all the time. For example, to "dime"
         | someone these days means call them on the phone.
        
           | yamazakiwi wrote:
           | I've been using the 2010's dime slang and didn't know about
           | this one.
        
           | jjk166 wrote:
           | I have never heard the word dime used that way, nor do I see
           | anything in the first few google results about it being used
           | that way.
           | 
           | There was a 60s slang term "drop a dime" which meant to call
           | someone, and nowadays that phrase means to call the cops or
           | to snitch.
        
             | WalterBright wrote:
             | It's used in the miniseries "Power".
        
           | Retric wrote:
           | Which doesn't make the above statement false.
        
         | oever wrote:
         | And people who engage in unauthorized wiretapping for
         | governments are not privateers.
        
       | brightball wrote:
       | But you have heard of them...
       | 
       | EDIT: I know, I'm sorry. I couldn't help it.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | dragontamer wrote:
       | I wouldn't say I'm very well studied in Pirates, but I've played
       | "Sid Meyer's Pirates" and loved it.
       | 
       | A common theme in the game is that there are 4 great powers of
       | the Caribbean sea: the British, the French, the Dutch, and the
       | Spanish. Different cities have different allegiances (and as the
       | Navies of the respective powers move, those cities could change
       | sides). There's also trade winds to account for, the value of
       | plunder (wheat, guns, and other goods you capture). There's also
       | different statistics for different ships... and those statistics
       | depend on the direction on of the wind (the canoe being the
       | fastest against the wind for example).
       | 
       | ----------
       | 
       | Anyway, where I'm going with this is that you're a Pirate in the
       | game. However, your first goal is almost always to obtain a
       | Letter of Marque from one of the great powers. The game even
       | allows you to obtain a letter of marque from all 4 great powers
       | (though unrealistic, its kinda funny to think you're a Privateer
       | authorized to plunder all other powers)
       | 
       | This is a bit of a sarcastic wink that the difference between a
       | "Pirate" and a "Privateer" really isn't much. You go off on your
       | sea vessel, you attack trade ships and plunder them. The
       | Privateer just has a piece of paper (the Letter of Marque) that
       | shows that you're doing it on behalf of a power.
       | 
       | ------
       | 
       | John Paul Jones is perhaps the most famous American Privateer. In
       | 1776, when the Revolutionary War started, John Paul Jones and his
       | ship was off in Europe on other business. Hearing that war has
       | been declared, he began to attack the British Isles on behalf of
       | the USA.
       | 
       | John Paul Jones was captured however and charged for Piracy.
       | Fortunately, he had an American Flag flying on his ship, so he
       | was "legitimate".
       | 
       | Alas: the American Flag was described to him through letters. So
       | he really didn't know what it looked like. He just... kinda drew
       | the flag as best he could:
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serapis_flag (13 stripes of red-
       | white-and blue, with 13 stars on the top left? Gotcha. Totally
       | the American flag, right?). At least, the Dutch thought it was an
       | American flag (probably a political statement on behalf of the
       | Dutch against the British, but hey, politics always existed).
       | 
       | Anyway, my point is that a Letter of Marque was a big deal,
       | making these "piracy" events legitimate. If you're just randomly
       | attacking the British and stealing stuff, you're a Pirate. But if
       | you're doing that because of the 1776 Revolutionary war (and you
       | have a "flag", albeit a poorly drawn incorrect one + the piece of
       | paper / signature from the US Congress stating the Letter of
       | Marque), you're a lawful combatant and treated as such.
       | 
       | Piracy probably never really died off. It just became legalized
       | in the weirdest way possible.
       | 
       | ------
       | 
       | Age of Sail, in English-speaking countries, is romanticized with
       | Spanish enemies (see Capt. Hook, who is clearly wearing Spanish
       | Garb + a Spanish Galleon). Because the Spanish ruled the seas in
       | the 1400s, while the British were the upstarts. Fighting "dirty"
       | by using Pirates (and later privateers) is just the natural
       | result of the politics of that age. We can reverse-engineer the
       | age of sail somewhat through our legends and stories that we've
       | passed down over the centuries.
       | 
       | From an American perspective: we romanticize the British/Dutch
       | trading company as the enemy somewhat. (See Pirates of the
       | Caribbean), because "our" privateers/pirates attacked British
       | ships.
       | 
       | -------
       | 
       | Given that the difference between a "Pirate" and a "Privateer"
       | was simply political pieces of paper, I would not be surprised
       | that Pirates were all over the US Colonies from the 1600s. The 13
       | colonies issued over 1700 letters of Marque during the
       | Revolutionary War IIRC, suggesting a significant number of
       | "skilled sea plunderers" in the colonies, so to speak, of varying
       | sizes. No, the USA never had a good enough Navy to really fight
       | the British on equal terms during the Revolutionary war, but
       | these Privateers were pivotal in harassing / annoying those trade
       | routes / supply routes.
       | 
       | Those skills didn't just magically appear in 1776 during the war.
       | Those people "were already" pirates, and just chose to support
       | the Revolutionary War and begin to organize into the USA's
       | nascent Navy. There's no documentation of this beforehand because
       | those people were likely illegal pirates, so its a "purposeful"
       | forgetting of those old crimes in order to bootstrap the early
       | Navy. IMO anyway.
       | 
       | But yeah, not much may be known about "Pirates". But the legal
       | "Privateer" is extremely well documented and well studied. And
       | you can definitely see and feel the "wink-wink and nod" towards
       | Piracy if you go through the historical records.
        
         | exalted1ne wrote:
         | I do not have a lot of expertise into the above nor Sid Meyers,
         | but man, I just want to say that I appreciate the
         | insight/opinion. Thank you for the well written response.
        
         | twic wrote:
         | English wikipedia:
         | 
         | > Sir Francis Drake (c. 1540 - 28 January 1596)[3] was an
         | English explorer, sea captain, privateer, slave
         | trader,[4][5][6] naval officer, and politician.
         | 
         | Spanish wikipedia:
         | 
         | > Francis Drake (Tavistock, Inglaterra, 1540-Portobelo, Panama,
         | 28 de enero de 1596) fue un corsario, explorador, comerciante
         | de esclavos, politico y vicealmirante ingles.
         | 
         | The two languages understandably place different relative
         | emphasis on Drake's various occupations.
        
           | dragontamer wrote:
           | > corsario
           | 
           | Good grief. The word "Corsair" in English means Pirate (or at
           | least: Pirate Ship), but the word "corsario" in Spanish
           | apparently means privateer.
           | 
           | Apparently this "Pirate vs Privateer" issue turns into a
           | fundamental linguistic issue depending on what side you were
           | on in the 1500s age of sail.
           | 
           | ------
           | 
           | > vicealmirante
           | 
           | I'm amused that Captain translates into Vice Admiral.
        
             | svachalek wrote:
             | Interesting, capitan is definitely a word (yo no soy
             | marinero, as they say in La Bamba)
        
             | jjk166 wrote:
             | > I'm amused that Captain translates into Vice Admiral.
             | 
             | Francis Drake actually was an English Vice Admiral. The
             | Spanish wikipedia is just more precise than the English one
             | which merely calls him a naval officer.
        
         | bombcar wrote:
         | There was (is?) a strong suspicion on the part of the British
         | that the whole 1776 kerfuffle was likely caused by the colony
         | being infested with pirates and smugglers, and not liking being
         | cracked down upon.
        
           | tomrod wrote:
           | I'm going to channel my inner thoughts right now:
           | 
           | wut-literal taxation without representation
        
           | adastra22 wrote:
           | I mean, that's kinda the opinion on the American side as
           | well, no? The Sons of Liberty were a loose association of
           | smugglers, undoubtably with some pirate connections. The
           | Boston tea party was about lowering the tax on tea, not
           | raising it, which impacted the black market these guys were
           | selling in.
        
         | jjk166 wrote:
         | > John Paul Jones is perhaps the most famous American
         | Privateer. In 1776, when the Revolutionary War started, John
         | Paul Jones and his ship was off in Europe on other business.
         | Hearing that war has been declared, he began to attack the
         | British Isles on behalf of the USA.
         | 
         | John Paul Jones had been living in the american colonies for a
         | few years before the war broke out. He was a member of the
         | American Philosophical Society in Philadelphia in 1774, and
         | personally knew Richard Henry Lee. When the war broke out in
         | 1775 he joined the American navy and was a lieutenant serving
         | on the USS Alfred, the first ship to be commissioned by the
         | Continental Navy. While many of the missions he commanded
         | involved commerce raiding, he was never a privateer and never
         | carried Letters of Marque.
         | 
         | > Alas: the American Flag was described to him through letters.
         | So he really didn't know what it looked like.
         | 
         | John Paul Jones was actually the very first person to hoist
         | America's official naval ensign, one of his duties on the
         | maiden voyage of the Alfred. It was actually Ben Franklin who
         | didn't know what an American flag looked like, and told the
         | dutch it had blue stripes.
         | 
         | > John Paul Jones was captured however and charged for Piracy.
         | Fortunately, he had an American Flag flying on his ship, so he
         | was "legitimate".
         | 
         | He was not captured and charged with Piracy, he was in a Dutch
         | port and the Brtish asked he be handed over as a pirate,
         | instead of as a commander of an American vessel. He knew
         | perfectly well what an American naval ensign looked like, and
         | had been flying one, but it was shot away in battle. In fact
         | the whole ship had been sunk and he transferred over to a
         | British ship captured in the same battle. Further, this event
         | occurred in 1779, more than 3 years after Jones had joined the
         | American Navy, and was actually the last American ship that he
         | would command.
        
         | kilolima wrote:
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Legend_(Spain)
         | 
         | Related to your comment on Captain Hook.
         | 
         | Thanks for the very informative post!
        
         | cafard wrote:
         | Did the Spanish rule the sea in the 1400s? They didn't have
         | full control of the peninsula until 1492.
         | 
         | The US frigates had a good record against British frigates in
         | the War of 1812, but they couldn't have fought a major
         | engagement with the Royal Navy. The privateers were
         | tremendously effective then.
        
       | dec0dedab0de wrote:
       | I don't know how accurate it is but the lost pirate kingdom on
       | netflix was pretty entertaining, and included quite a bit of
       | information I was not aware of.
        
       | jghn wrote:
       | I very much enjoyed "The Republic Of Pirates: Being the True and
       | Surprising Story of the Caribbean Pirates and the Man Who Brought
       | Them Down" by Colin Woodward. I'm pretty sure I originally came
       | across it in a thread here on HN.
       | 
       | Not that I'm expert enough to know, but it felt well researched.
       | On the assumption that what he said was as true as possible given
       | the circumstances, I thought it was pretty enlightening.
        
         | kedean wrote:
         | For anyone fiction-inclined, The Silver Oar by Howard Breslin
         | is the first thing that the opening part of this article
         | reminded me of. It focuses on an accused pirate on the run in
         | the New England colonies, and his ongoing relationship with
         | various colonial characters. A fun swashbuckling read if one
         | wants to branch away from prestige literature.
        
         | Apocryphon wrote:
         | _Black Sails_ was a fun fictionalization of that history,
         | crossed over with the prehistory of _Treasure Island_. It 's
         | opening sequence is unbeatable.
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFTcA4QLHw0
        
           | jghn wrote:
           | Huge fan of this show. It started off a bit weak but really
           | took off over time.
        
         | samvher wrote:
         | Since we're doing book recommendations :) I thought "The
         | Invisible Hook: The Hidden Economics of Pirates" [1] was a fun
         | read as well.
         | 
         | [1] https://www.amazon.com/Invisible-Hook-Hidden-Economics-
         | Pirat...
        
       | dang wrote:
       | Discussed at the time:
       | 
       |  _A lot we know about pirates is not true, and a lot of what is
       | true is not known_ -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14287212 - May 2017 (90
       | comments)
        
       | Schroedingersat wrote:
       | This article keeps describing anarchists and then following up
       | with 'but they're not anarchists'.
       | 
       | You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think
       | it means.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-10-19 23:00 UTC)