[HN Gopher] 27 years ago, Hoover offered free international flig...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       27 years ago, Hoover offered free international flights with any
       PS100 purchase
        
       Author : Anon84
       Score  : 136 points
       Date   : 2022-10-23 13:23 UTC (9 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (thehustle.co)
 (TXT) w3m dump (thehustle.co)
        
       | vr46 wrote:
       | My friend and I actually did this! We bought a Hoover, got
       | flights to New York - I flew out months and months later in
       | summer 1993 - and the Hoover itself we gave to my parents, and
       | it's STILL there at my late parents' place, working.
       | 
       | Helluva deal for us.
        
       | ghaff wrote:
       | I confess that I don't actually know why rebates went so far out
       | of fashion. I assume companies figured out better ways to price
       | discriminate and enough people got to the point of "what's a
       | stamp?" that even many price sensitive people weren't reeled in
       | by rebates.
       | 
       | A random piece of trivia is that most rebate forms went to Young
       | America in Minnesota. A long ago company I worked for supplied
       | them with a lot of their computing gear.
        
         | bombcar wrote:
         | https://www.menards.com/main/home.html BUT lesser known
         | https://www.homedepotrebates11percent.com
        
       | OrangeMonkey wrote:
       | Most "sales promotions" in the 90's were little more than fraud.
       | 
       | Most of us remember the period where almost everything in
       | computer stores were "free after rebate." "Emachine 1997 model
       | FREE AFTER REBATE", "Pack of 50 CDR FREE AFTER REBATE".
       | 
       | The rebate involved you filling out a form with the original
       | proof of purchase, sending it off, and either never hearing from
       | them again or having it denied. "Sorry, wrong receipt, send us
       | the real one" but it was already gone.
       | 
       | Now, I assume anything with a rebate is fraud. The insight from
       | this article is that we were right.
        
         | scarface74 wrote:
         | I sent like 15 people to get free Emachines after signing up
         | for MSN for two years. They all got it.
        
         | themitigating wrote:
         | Anecdotal experience
         | 
         | I've gotten all the rebates I've filled out. I just assume that
         | enough people are sloppy or don't read instructions that it
         | works out for the company
        
         | Sebguer wrote:
         | An amazing spoof of this from Nathan For You comes to mind:
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbC0-tuYE2o
        
           | warbler73 wrote:
           | Wow thanks for that, really good. Love the alligator.
        
           | codekansas wrote:
           | I thought the link was going to be this one:
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IWotuQBgs4
        
         | CalRobert wrote:
         | I had about a 95% success rate. As a broke student in the early
         | naughties I got almost everything tech FAR. CompUSA and Frys
         | (pour one out) were especially good. I miss the cameraderie of
         | the Black Friday Frys line.
        
           | LegitShady wrote:
           | >early naughties
           | 
           | Haram
        
         | musicale wrote:
         | I miss Fry's Electronics, but they were definitely a
         | practitioner of "free after rebate" and other rebate-based
         | discount schemes where they took your money up front and
         | claimed that you would get some of it back from some third
         | party sometime in the future.
         | 
         | In spite of the obviously scammy nature of such promotions, I
         | still took the bait a few times, averaging probably a 50%
         | rebate success rate - somewhat better than I would have
         | predicted. At some point there was a web site where you could
         | check your rebate status, which seemed to help a bit.
        
         | United857 wrote:
         | I forget the name but during the dot-com era there was a
         | company who sold stuff like TVs at vastly inflated prices
         | (something like 10x retail) to consumers on the premise that
         | they could get a 100% rebate by mailing in a form thus making
         | the purchase "for free".
         | 
         | Their business model was based on the assumption that a
         | percentage of customers would forget to do this. Unfortunately,
         | when hundreds or thousands of $ is on the line, people were
         | very diligent! Unsurprisingly that company didn't last long.
        
           | hn_throwaway_99 wrote:
           | Yeah, it baffles me that whoever did the planning for this
           | thought that "making it cumbersome to fill out" would work
           | the same as for, say, a 5% rebate on a small purchase vs.
           | when the rebate is worth thousands of dollars.
        
             | ferrocarraiges wrote:
             | I wonder if the decision-maker could have been wealthy
             | enough that thousands of dollars felt insignificant to
             | them. At some point, you lose sight of how much things
             | cost, because the answer is almost always "not much".
             | 
             | Reminds me of Jessica Walter's character in Arrested
             | Development: "It's a banana, Michael - how much could it
             | cost? Ten dollars?"
        
               | grogenaut wrote:
               | How many years till that's true
        
               | Tarsul wrote:
               | People in 2100 will laugh at that joke and think "that's
               | way too cheap. What is she thinking!"
        
             | hinkley wrote:
             | When a chore pays more than your day job, people often find
             | a way to get it done.
        
           | ars wrote:
           | They were called CyberRebate.
           | 
           | I got so much stuff I didn't need from them. I filled my
           | entire dining table with stuff, and got my family to help me
           | with an assembly line style UPC cutting and pasting
           | operation.
           | 
           | I even scripted their website to auto-generate the rebate
           | form.
           | 
           | The final batch never paid out, but I was able to file a
           | credit card chargeback for most, but not all, of it.
           | 
           | I scripted that too. I had to print and fax around 400 pages
           | of documentation to the credit card company. (Print directly
           | to fax either didn't exist then, or at least I didn't have
           | it.)
           | 
           | It's been how many years? And I still have stuff from them in
           | my house, some in use, some just brand new in a box.
           | 
           | I was getting 1.5% cashback from the credit card I used, and
           | everything was completely free.
        
           | seattle_spring wrote:
           | Oh man I remember that site! Adding this comment to remind
           | myself to research it later.
           | 
           | Edit: cyberrebate.com [1]
           | 
           | [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CyberRebate
        
         | esalman wrote:
         | I bought an MSI gaming laptop in 2106 and they promised $100
         | back after rebate. Never heard back.
        
           | layer8 wrote:
           | $100 is barely worth anything in 2106.
        
           | celticninja wrote:
           | Future you should probably not buy that laptop then.
        
           | Waterluvian wrote:
           | I don't understand the complaint. You'll get your money in
           | 2106.
        
         | shepherdjerred wrote:
         | https://youtu.be/6vbCKava_JE
        
         | whoooooo123 wrote:
        
         | bagels wrote:
         | I got most of my rebates at Frys back, but tried to avoid those
         | purchases because of the hassle. I will never forget though the
         | rebate that Microsoft refused to honor for the joystick I
         | bought as a kid.
        
         | Spooky23 wrote:
         | You missed the first part, which was "read the instructions".
         | 
         | I worked at a store that heavily promoted these things to get
         | foot traffic. The only people with problems were the people
         | lining up on Sunday meaning to fill a cart with shit they
         | didn't need - or even know what it was to get it for "free".
         | 
         | I remember one guy, who punched me in the mouth, screaming that
         | he bought a scam video card "it doesn't even play tapes" for
         | $14.95 and didn't get his $20 rebate for whatever reason. I
         | think that he didn't include the UPC code or something. The
         | medical bills after I threw him out the window, the arrest and
         | fine were a lot more than $14.95.
         | 
         | I used the free cd offers all of the time to get CD-Rs... we'd
         | make custom mix CDs for the folks in our dorm.
        
           | jimjimjim wrote:
           | The world would be a much better place if more hackernews
           | comments could include the phrase "I threw him out the
           | window".
        
           | bagels wrote:
           | Throwing someone through a window may cross the line beyond
           | self defense, but did the customer get charged too?
        
             | jamiek88 wrote:
             | It's an expression. Russians even take it further,
             | 'defenestration'!
             | 
             | I assume from the story those are the angry fellows charges
             | not our hero protagonist.
             | 
             | One can not punch a person and not expect retaliation, even
             | if that person you perceive to be a social inferior to you
             | doing retail work.
             | 
             | Funny you took the complete opposite way that the clerk got
             | in trouble.
        
               | scarface74 wrote:
               | Defenestration is an old term in tech circles which meant
               | just the opposite - throw Windows out of your computer
        
               | Huh1337 wrote:
               | Defenestration is a Czech expression (the Czech language
               | works with Latin roots a lot, even has special grammar
               | for it). Russians only adopted it.
        
               | shkkmo wrote:
               | Defenestration is a term coined to describe a political
               | event in Prague but I'm not sure the word itself is Czech
               | but is arguably French, Latin or English in origin.
               | 
               | > Though already existing in Middle French, the word
               | defenestrate ("out of the window") is believed to have
               | first been used in English in reference to the episodes
               | in Prague in 1618 when the disgruntled Protestant estates
               | threw two royal governors out of a window of the Hradcany
               | Castle and wrote an extensive apologia explaining their
               | action.
               | 
               | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defenestrations_of_Prague
               | 
               | But that article has no citations for that claim...
        
               | Huh1337 wrote:
               | Well I guess it depends on how you attribute words to
               | languages. In Czech language it's standard practice to
               | compose words with Latin stems. The word was originally
               | written by a Czech person in a Czech language text using
               | specialized Czech grammar for integration of Latin stems.
               | 
               | The prefix de- is used in Czech normally since forever
               | and to this day (originally Latin though), the stem
               | fenestra is Latin (not normally used in Czech), and the
               | suffix -ace is Czech (Slavic origin).
               | 
               | BTW the quote you posted says the first usage in English
               | language was in reference to the Czech text which
               | actually coined it (thus the English text adopted it),
               | not that it's English in origin.
        
               | The_Colonel wrote:
               | > The prefix de- is used in Czech normally since forever
               | and to this day
               | 
               | It's only used in loan words. Like "depilace" is a
               | normally used loanword in Czech, non-loan word variant
               | would be "odchlupeni". But "dechlupeni" (using "de-"
               | instead of "od-" + native Czech word) would be completely
               | nonsensical.
               | 
               | Claiming that "defenestrace" is originally a Czech word
               | seems absurd to me. It might have been "invented" in
               | Czech lands, but clearly from the latin form.
        
               | Huh1337 wrote:
               | Hmm, _a lot_ of Czech words aren 't actually Czech, then.
               | I think that makes even less sense. The fact is the Czech
               | language loans heavily from many different languages
               | (Latin being one of the top donors) - but that doesn't
               | mean we speak a mix of languages in one sentence.
               | 
               | The prefix de- is not used only in loanwords, you can
               | construct new words with it just fine. It doesn't sound
               | right in your example but that doesn't mean it's
               | nonsense.
        
               | The_Colonel wrote:
               | "defenestrace" is a Czech word, "defenestration" is an
               | English word, but they can both trace their origin to the
               | latin "defenestratio".
               | 
               | > The prefix de- is not used only in loanwords, you can
               | construct new words with it just fine.
               | 
               | Listing some examples would strengthen your argument
               | immensely.
               | 
               | > It doesn't sound right in your example but that doesn't
               | mean it's nonsense.
               | 
               | To my native ear, it sounds nonsensical. I wouldn't be
               | able to guess what it is supposed to mean.
        
               | Huh1337 wrote:
               | Defenestratio is not a Latin word, you wouldn't describe
               | the act like that as a Latin speaker. You'd say something
               | involving the words "de fenestra", but definitely not as
               | one word.
               | 
               | It was the Czech person who first combined the
               | Czech/Latin prefix, the Latin stem and the Czech/Slavic
               | suffix in a decidedly Czech sentence.
               | 
               | > Listing some examples would strengthen your argument
               | immensely.
               | 
               | You said one yourself. Nobody would say it because
               | there's already a better way to say that, but everybody
               | would understand the meaning and the grammar is fine.
        
               | The_Colonel wrote:
               | "dechlupeni" is not a Czech word.
               | 
               | > but everybody would understand the meaning and the
               | grammar is fine.
               | 
               | No, I certainly wouldn't. It's nonsense.
               | 
               | Can you name a word formed like that which is present in
               | some dictionary?
        
               | Huh1337 wrote:
               | Even if you're right about that, it still doesn't make
               | the word Latin. Latin speakers wouldn't say it as one
               | word, and there would also be a verb in a Latin sentence
               | - "de fenestra" by itself is nonsense.
               | 
               | (I had the displeasure of studying Latin in school)
        
               | The_Colonel wrote:
               | > Latin speakers wouldn't say it as one word
               | 
               | Note that all Latin speakers in that time period spoke
               | Latin as their second (third...) language, and it was
               | pretty common to see influence of other (mother)
               | languages onto the used Latin. It wouldn't be surprising
               | if e.g. a German native speaker (where such word
               | concoctions are common place) coined such a Latin word.
        
               | thaumasiotes wrote:
               | It would also be unsurprising to see a native speaker of
               | classical Latin coin such a Latin word. _defenestro_ and
               | _defenestratio_ are perfectly compatible with the normal
               | methods of word formation in classical Latin, which very
               | rarely forms compound nouns, but which forms compounds of
               | verbs with prepositional prefixes all the time. (Just in
               | that last sentence, you can see the ghostly remains of
               | _perfectus_ [thoroughly-done], _compono_ [with-put],
               | _praepositio_ [before-putting], and _praefixus_ [before-
               | fastened], all impeccably classical. You can also see
               | _compatior_ [with-endure], which does not seem to have
               | existed in classical Latin, but is obviously derived in
               | exactly the same way as the others.)
               | 
               | Here ( https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/morph?l=defat
               | igatio&la=... ) is a dictionary entry citing
               | _defatigatio_ to a speech given by Cicero.
        
               | shkkmo wrote:
               | Do you have sources or references for any of this? I
               | can't find any sources that dig into by who or in what
               | text "defenstrate" was originally coined. You say it is
               | in reference to "the Czech text" but don't clarify which
               | text you qre talking about? The quote is posted makes no
               | reference to any text...
               | 
               | The best discussion of the original formation of the word
               | I have been able to find was here: https://linguistics.st
               | ackexchange.com/questions/35905/did-a-...
        
               | saiya-jin wrote:
               | its a czech _practice_ with few town-hall people in
               | Prague few centuries ago IIRC, not a czech word per se
        
               | throwayyy479087 wrote:
               | Defenestration and defenestrate are words in English and
               | Spanish as well. It's a common concept
        
               | WastingMyTime89 wrote:
               | Not to be mistaken with transfenestration which is
               | something you do yearly to prove you are still insane and
               | keep getting your check.
        
             | notch656a wrote:
        
               | ceejayoz wrote:
               | That's likely to depend on at least a) the height of the
               | window - a first floor window will be treated very
               | differently than a tenth floor one - and b) the distance
               | from the altercation to the window.
        
               | notch656a wrote:
        
             | Spooky23 wrote:
             | The guy jumped me as I retreated and got tossed away from
             | the crowd. (Hell I was making $4.50/hr + spiffs, not there
             | to fight people) Fortunately, I spent most of my teenage
             | years doing farm work, and it was all caught on camera.
             | 
             | The cops thought it was great. My boss not so much. The
             | whole thing was absurd - an adult attacking a 19 year old
             | over a few dollars.
        
           | greenthrow wrote:
           | /r/ThatHappened
        
         | Larrikin wrote:
         | I don't know about the nineties, but nearly every single rebate
         | offer I've ever filled out I've gotten the money promised.
         | Sometimes it takes a while but most of them are online and you
         | just fill in your bank account information. Takes at most a
         | couple minutes. Some random amount of months later you get a
         | deposit in your account.
         | 
         | I also try to do any of those class action suits I qualify for.
         | Those are a little more hit or miss but it's about the same
         | time investment of a simple form, but usually those take a lot
         | longer to get money. Got a check for 3 bucks for buying chips
         | at some point in the past couple years, but it was really nice
         | getting hundreds of dollars put into my bank account from
         | Facebook a few months back after filing a claim years ago and
         | forgetting about it.
        
         | vermooten wrote:
         | Not quite true, but I can see why you'd think that. I worked
         | for a reputable SP company in Oxfordshire, legal were all over
         | everything we did. The Hoover debacle did wonders for our
         | business, all of a sudden clients wanted protection from the
         | scammers.
         | 
         | But ok I then went to one in London and some directors were
         | sent to prison for fraud. So OP yes you have a point. It was a
         | dodgy world.
        
         | treeman79 wrote:
         | Mad dad was obsessed with those cd and floppy disk rebates.
         | 
         | I believe he got paid every time or close to.
        
         | notyourwork wrote:
         | I don't recall ever getting one denied. Maybe I was lucky but
         | those CD rebates were huge for me as a kid to have infinite
         | supply of media to write content to. Music, games, apps, etc.
        
           | astura wrote:
           | Yep, Same, I've filled out probably 25+ rebates in my life
           | and I always got the rebate, eventually. You have to make
           | sure you read and follow the fine print though - the
           | instructions are very specific. The GP probably didn't read
           | the fine print.
           | 
           | I still have several spindles of CD-Rs (and later DVD-Rs)
           | that were free (or maybe $1) after rebate.
        
             | londons_explore wrote:
             | Similar 'cashback' deals exist even now... You rarely get
             | 100% back. Often there isn't too much fine print either,
             | and the payout rate is ~90% in my experience.
             | 
             | Sometimes they insist in paying in amazon vouchers or some
             | other 'almost cash' currency.
             | 
             | They are very common on subscriptions.
        
               | astura wrote:
               | Oh, you don't have to tell me, I have made several
               | hundred dollars on these deals - I only do money makers
               | (where the cash back is more than the cost of the
               | subscription). Plus one of my friends can always use the
               | subscription stuff and are thrilled to get the items if
               | it's not something I'd use. (Such as makeup & dog toys).
               | I've always had the correct payout. I have a browser that
               | I solely use for cash back websites.
               | 
               | I usually find out about these deals on
               | https://www.doctorofcredit.com/ which is run by what
               | seems like fantastic, non-scammy, people and its the only
               | credit card blog that I know of that's independent. The
               | rest shill for referrals.
        
               | Fatnino wrote:
               | Amazon bucks are the closest thing to cash.
               | 
               | Other things used as cash include gift cards, cigarettes,
               | drugs, bikes, iDevices, baby formula, diapers, laundry
               | detergent...
        
               | ghaff wrote:
               | >Amazon bucks are the closest thing to cash.
               | 
               | Although, generally speaking, Amazon and other general
               | purpose large retailers (Walmart, Home Depot) have
               | figured that out. When I get rewards points of some sort
               | with an option to convert to various gift cards, the best
               | deal is always with the specialty retailers but then you
               | need to make a point of using the card for something you
               | really want/need as opposed to just adding some dollars
               | to your Amazon account.
        
           | spaetzleesser wrote:
           | I wrote my first web app to track my rebates :). Even had
           | some sign ups. Vbscript with an Access database. Worked
           | pretty well.
        
         | spaetzleesser wrote:
         | I bought a lot of stuff with rebates and I almost always got a
         | check after a very long wait. Sometimes you had to call the
         | number to make them send it out. It was fine when I didn't make
         | much money but after a while it was too much hassle.
        
           | tomjen3 wrote:
           | And that is the point: price discrimination. For some 22
           | dollars is expensive, so they will do some work for the 12-14
           | dollar rebate. People making good monies won't care too much,
           | or not at all.
        
       | raisedbyninjas wrote:
       | An early internet promotion that would have probably been more
       | costly if they had the same advertising reach was online casino
       | deposit bonuses. In the early 2000s it was popular for online
       | casinos to offer bonuses on deposits used to play. Say 50% or
       | 100% bonus up to $2000. The only catches were one bonus per
       | household and you had to bet at least the full amount of the
       | deposit and bonus before cashing out. There was no limit on the
       | game to use it with or other hoops to jump through. So it was
       | pretty easy nearly break even in black-jack for 30 minutes, cash
       | out, and move onto the next.
        
         | jamiek88 wrote:
         | Every single word of your post was great, correct, but
         | meaningless at the time except for two words near the end.
         | 
         | Cash. Out.
         | 
         | Man, I went through all those hoops, spent weeks, scamming
         | those systems, real money too, but mostly playing the game you
         | outlined but when it came time to get that money suddenly that
         | sites admins were in cayman. Then Bermuda. Then Sri Lanka and
         | their English suddenly wasn't too good!
         | 
         | Once I ended up with a _perosnal cheque_ from one of their guys
         | as I was bitching on the forum making them look bad.
         | 
         | Can't believe a) I cashed it and it and b) it wasn't a scam.
        
           | raisedbyninjas wrote:
           | Believable. I just never had a problem or weird delay.
        
           | kuboble wrote:
           | I actually got 600$ from an online casino like that. (2007
           | iirc)
           | 
           | I got free 50$ but had to wager 2k$ before cashing out.
           | Played some slot machine, run hot and had 600$ by the time
           | the bonus cleared. I took out cash from ATM a couple days
           | later.
        
       | davidgerard wrote:
       | (2019)
        
       | cosmodisk wrote:
       | This and entry level books on legal contracts make a fantastic
       | read on how things can go wrong very quickly for those who
       | promise heaven and then some more.
        
       | musicale wrote:
       | Disastrous promotions notwithstanding, didn't Dyson eclipse
       | Hoover by developing a greatly improved design (bagless/cyclonic,
       | which has since become a popular standard design for vacuum
       | cleaners?)
        
       | tfsh wrote:
       | My mother used this to go on holiday (Greece if I recall, however
       | I may be many thousands of miles off). We still have the very
       | same Hoover, so for her it wasn't a bad deal.
        
       | NomDePlum wrote:
       | Myself and a friend bought a hoover for the flights to the U.S.
       | 
       | I've no memory of the application process being difficult and we
       | even returned the hoover to the store and swapped it for the
       | equivalent in Sega mega drive games without any issues.
       | 
       | I actually went out to the US separately as part of a student
       | work America summer visa and my friend and another person used
       | the voucher to meet me in Orlando. This was definitely late 1992
       | so very sure the quote about no flights being honoured initially
       | aren't accurate.
        
       | paulpauper wrote:
       | It's sorta like this with many vc-backed companies. Operate at a
       | loss to get market share in the hope that some customers can be
       | billed later or raise prices.
        
       | noncoml wrote:
       | Isn't that the plot for "Crazy Stupid Love"
        
       | traceroute66 wrote:
       | I don't know, I'd say "one of the worst".
       | 
       | To be truly "worst", I'd say you'd have to feature in the
       | textbooks of students of English contract law.
       | 
       | See, for example, _Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company_ [1]
       | which is a famous example used in every single textbook.
       | 
       | [1]
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlill_v_Carbolic_Smoke_Ball_...
        
         | ghaff wrote:
         | Ah the opening of _The Paper Chase_ film. Well worth watching
         | by the way if you haven 't.
        
         | amelius wrote:
         | How about:
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepsi_Number_Fever
         | 
         | > Pepsi Number Fever, also known as the 349 incident, was a
         | promotion held by PepsiCo in the Philippines in 1992, which led
         | to riots and the deaths of at least five people.
         | 
         | Somehow, the company and the brand still exist.
        
           | bsjaux628 wrote:
           | From the article, 3 victims were PepsiCo workers and 2 were a
           | teacher and a student that were caught in the blast of a pipe
           | bomb thrown at a PepsiCo truck. How is the company to blame
           | for the action of a mob of idiots and anarchists?
        
       | karthickgururaj wrote:
       | This was recently covered in depth in "Now I Know" [0] - a random
       | corner of Internet with quirky collection of articles. I have
       | been a happy reader these past many weeks.
       | 
       | [0] https://nowiknow.com/the-marketing-stunt-that-vacuumed-
       | up-a-...
        
       | mellosouls wrote:
       | This reminds me of American Airlines "Lifetime Unlimited First-
       | Class Flying" pass snapped up by a lucky few to AA's regret.
       | 
       | https://simpleflying.com/american-airlines-aairpass/
        
       | ww520 wrote:
       | The U.S. Treasury used to run a promotion on the online sale of
       | dollar coins to encourage the usage of them in circulation. They
       | accepted credit cards for the online purchases and shipped the
       | coins free of charge. People just bought them with credit cards
       | that gave rebates, points, or miles, and then deposited the coins
       | in banks to get back the cash.
        
         | no_wizard wrote:
         | I have heard of this before. I even met someone who claimed
         | they they would do this with their high cash back cards and
         | claimed to reap thousands in rewards with unlimited cash back.
         | Even said they would open new cards to do this with they high
         | dollar promo periods and high credit limits and would just do
         | this while the promotion was active.
         | 
         | Claimed to have made thousands on it, maybe even 10s of
         | thousands
         | 
         | I always wondered if your credit scorn would be all jacked
         | because it would report this high to zero usage
        
           | arcanemachiner wrote:
           | > I always wondered if your credit scorn would be all jacked
           | because it would report this high to zero usage
           | 
           | I shall add this to my list of unverifiable FICO score
           | rumors.
        
           | matgessel wrote:
           | > temporary impact on your credit score. Applying for
           | multiple credit cards at once will reduce your score for a
           | few months; if you will be applying for a mortgage, car loan,
           | job, apartment, or other situation that requires a check of
           | your credit, it is a good idea to stop all churning activity
           | as far in advance as possible. Most conservative estimates
           | recommend at least 2 years as "hard pulls" from credit card
           | inquiries will fall off your credit report in 2 years.
           | 
           | > your homeowners insurance rate can be impacted by your
           | churning activity, even though your credit score remains
           | high. Your insurer regular does a soft pull on your credit,
           | and they may increase your rate if there are a lot of new
           | credit lines, even though your overall credit score and
           | utilization may remain in good standing.
           | 
           | https://www.reddit.com/r/churning/wiki/index
        
           | userbinator wrote:
           | It's called "manufactured spending".
        
       | byoung2 wrote:
       | Also in the running:
       | https://www.cbc.ca/radio/undertheinfluence/the-bottle-cap-sn...
        
         | II2II wrote:
         | Given the phrasing of the article, it sounds like an "honest"
         | mistake in Pepsi's case. The intent to distribute two prizes
         | likely means the number was predetermined or that it was to be
         | selected from a small pool of numbers that had a low run.
         | 
         | On the other hand, the Hoover example was based upon pure
         | dishonesty. They made a claim, put in a bunch of rules to
         | disqualify people, took steps to slant the rules in their
         | favour, then hoped it would be enough to win the numbers game.
         | Hope because they were relying upon assumptions that were very
         | much out of their control.
        
         | permo-w wrote:
         | sounds like pepsi got off lightly
        
       | permo-w wrote:
       | it worked once, so let's do it again - but BIGGER - is such a
       | classic business mistake
        
         | fabianhjr wrote:
         | Also ignoring any sort of risk analysis; its hilarious that
         | they were warned by risk professionals and decided to proceed
         | anyways.
        
           | chiefalchemist wrote:
           | Reading this and how unprofitable the offer was it almost
           | seems like they (i.e., executives) intentionally tanked the
           | company. The inspiration for Ted Lasso? :)
           | 
           | "The math was concerning: On the sale of a PS119 vacuum
           | cleaner, Hoover made a profit of PS30. The two free fights
           | that came with it were worth at least PS600. This meant that
           | each customer who followed through with the promotion cost
           | Hoover PS570."
        
       | fiftyacorn wrote:
       | Sad thing was it was a last ditch attempt to save jobs at a few
       | hoover factories in the UK. Redundancies followed and the last
       | factories closed in 2002
        
       | bbarnett wrote:
       | The trick with "under the cap" winnings, was to ship the lot with
       | the grand prize, to a slow consumption area.
       | 
       | I grew up in a rural area, but one with a tourist season. The
       | population almost tripled in tourist season, and tourists consume
       | far more "on the run" consumables.
       | 
       | More than one local won the grand prize, months after a 6 month
       | contest ended.
       | 
       | I won a brand new car, 2 months past win date.
        
         | syrrim wrote:
         | Meaning they didn't even honour it? Very shady.
        
       | andylynch wrote:
       | Really impressive. That's a bigger fiasco than when Gerald Ratner
       | said out loud that a prawn sandwich would outlast the earrings
       | sold in his stores.
        
       | crustycoder wrote:
       | Don't what the problem was, I got _my_ free holiday to Orlando
       | out of it, on the day I wanted and from the airport I wanted...
       | ;-)
       | 
       | The article missed out one important detail - the deal included
       | very overpriced accommodation, which is how they were going to
       | claw the cost of the flights back. But they failed to make
       | booking the accommodation through the deal mandatory, so people
       | took the flights and not the accommodation.
        
         | IMSAI8080 wrote:
         | Yep and overpriced travel insurance too. It wasn't just the
         | bureaucratic restrictions they were relying on. The plan was
         | the travel agents would do high pressure upselling to claw back
         | the cost but the public didn't bite in sufficient numbers.
         | 
         | http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3704669.stm
        
           | drc500free wrote:
           | Basically, Groupon.
        
       | DangitBobby wrote:
       | I think this "sales promotion" is actually just fraud?
        
         | ouid wrote:
         | Yeah the white washing of this extremely clear cut case of
         | fraud is journalistic malpractice. "Oh look at these cheeky
         | things Hoover did to try to "fleece" their customers in a
         | flagrant attempt to breach contract." This is like the toy yoda
         | story.
        
           | chrisgd wrote:
           | Is this what you are referring to?
           | https://www.boredpanda.com/toy-yoda-toyota-hooters-prank-
           | gon...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-10-23 23:00 UTC)