[HN Gopher] RISC-V Celebrates Upstreaming of Android Open Source... ___________________________________________________________________ RISC-V Celebrates Upstreaming of Android Open Source Project RISC-V Port Author : ndesaulniers Score : 70 points Date : 2022-10-24 18:38 UTC (4 hours ago) (HTM) web link (riscv.org) (TXT) w3m dump (riscv.org) | neilv wrote: | I've realized that my only interest in RISC-V all along has been | the disruptive opportunity to possibly get open and auditable | firmware and hardware (for human rights, empowerment, and | security). | | If AOSP on RISC-V helps promote RISC-V in a way that increases | the likelihood of viable open firmware and hardware emerging in | the ecology, that's great. | | However, if, like some dev boards I've seen, we end up heading | down a path of more of the same problem we already have with | user-hostile platforms (just musical chairs of who's making the | money from it), I'll save myself some trouble, and just keep | using x86-64 and ARM. | cbm-vic-20 wrote: | Yep. The RISC-V cores themselves will run the same | instructions, but there will almost certainly be a lot of | proprietary devices on the SoC they reside on. Chip vendors | save money by not paying ARM for a license. Maybe that savings | will be passed on to customers. Probably not. | Pet_Ant wrote: | Most devices will continue to be blackboxes. Most of the | support for RISC-V comes from players looking to [commodotise | their complements](https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2002/06/12/st | rategy-letter-v/) and avoid the ARM-licensing tax. They have no | interest in openers, just in less material cost and more | flexibility for themselves. However, this will allow for a | parallel community of open hardware to be built (in a way that | you can't due to the patents, licensing, and overall cruft of | x86/x86-64) that is compatible with the tools and software that | is being built for these ARM-tax dodgers. So you'll be able to | build a desktop that runs a fully open RISC-V CPU and board at | 10 times the price and half the cost of a blackbox solution and | while it will only run at half the speed, you will be able to | be a legitimate Windows license for it. That is a realistic | dream. | evilos wrote: | I know it is besides your point but the thought of going | through all that and then running windows on it made me | laugh. | nerpderp82 wrote: | You _should_ be able to take that AOSP and run it on hardware | you designed yourself. Getting RISC-V and AOSP together pulls | in thousands of more folks from the mobile phone ecosystem. | This can only be a good thing. | | The low end always eats the high end, so if AOSP is running on | budget RISC-V SoCs, it is only a matter of time before it is | encroaching on the middle and highend. | kramerger wrote: | > my only interest in RISC-V all along has been the disruptive | opportunity to possibly get open and auditable firmware and | hardware | | Someone PLEASE explain this to me? How in gods name will an | open ISA result in open firmware and standarized hardware?? | | And what is open ISA anyway? Is MIPS open? How about PowerPC? | Or, I don't know.. microblaze?? | snvzz wrote: | SBI (in practice, opensbi) has been standardized for years. | | UEFI on RISC-V (which is optional and runs after SBI does) was | standardized early this year. | | The pieces are in place for proper, standardized boot process, | way before phones/servers/laptops flood the market. | | I think RISC-V is a good position for boot chaos to be entirely | avoided. | loufe wrote: | Alibaba cloud supporting this effort with developer hours is a | smart play. Migrating away from Western-controlled technologies | (the complicated story of ARM China notwithstanding) is a good | political play. I would wager that an independant and further- | developed China will before too long start to push their own | propietary systems once their chip and software industries | approach American maturity. | | That aside, oh how I love seeing open source thrive, regardless | of the reason. | lsllc wrote: | Maybe it's me, but I'm getting a 404 on this link! | 0xcde4c3db wrote: | It seems to only load consistently for me if I navigate to it | from the front page of riscv.org, but it might just be some | intermittent issue in their CMS. | nerpderp82 wrote: | https://archive.ph/2iDvR | WASDx wrote: | Going to their main site https://riscv.org/ and _then_ | refreshing the article worked for me... | [deleted] | snvzz wrote: | To me it was 404 earlier, worked later. | | Some sort of CMS issue... perhaps they have out-of-sync | backends. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-10-24 23:01 UTC)