[HN Gopher] Why mathematicians study knots ___________________________________________________________________ Why mathematicians study knots Author : theafh Score : 106 points Date : 2022-10-31 16:37 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.quantamagazine.org) (TXT) w3m dump (www.quantamagazine.org) | shagie wrote: | One of the problems of old on CodeGolf.SE - Knot or Not - | https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/30292/knot-or-n... | | I took a crack at it one time (even ordered a back issue of | Scientific American - | https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-theory-of-kno... ) | and didn't even get something that had a working internal | representation that I could use. It's a hard problem. | padolsey wrote: | Seeing knots as curiosities of topology seems to miss the entire | point of knots: to fasten something with varying attributes of | tightness, slippage, tension, time, application constraints (E.g. | throwing lines from a distance over cleats/bollards) (etc....). I | have spent some hobby-level time playing with knots and it's | curious to see inherited wisdoms from the sailing world and | consider the engineering evolution of a knot being ~perfect for | its precise application. It's quite a marvel to see what can only | be described as the minimally pure and evolved knots, like the | bowline. There are many attributes at play and fun constraints to | consider. Seeing knots as fun puzzles in only the topological | space doesn't seem to account whatsoever for their tensile | characteristics ... which... uhh is the entire reason we use | them. | kazinator wrote: | That's like saying mathematicians miss the entire point of | numbers, which is to enumerate your head of livestock, or | bushels of corn. | padolsey wrote: | Very true. FWIW I'm not an academic by nature so wretchedly | practical perhaps and probably impatient with what I see as | narrowly applicable studies. | karmakurtisaani wrote: | You can think of the "topological" knot as an abstraction of | the physical knot in the sense that you can take away all the | physical properties of the knot and still be left with certain | structure that captures the "essence" of the knot. This is what | mathematics pretty much is. If you want to keep other | properties of the rope, that's all cool, but then you start | doing physics more than mathematics. | padolsey wrote: | Ah thanks that makes it a bit clearer. I guess I (falsely) | see mathematics as the "purer" manifestation of a thing and | thus hold it to account to abstract the complete substance of | a thing and its properties. But as you say, the physical is | of physics and that is where I should look for a more | exhaustive abstraction perhaps. | amluto wrote: | I worked on a fun project involving knots once: | | https://arxiv.org/pdf/1004.5127.pdf | | This uses knots as a mathematical structure in a quantum | cryptosystem. I tried to make the paper accessible without | letting it get bogged down in irrelevant details. | walterlb wrote: | I saw "The Ashley Book of Knots" mentioned on another post, and | it has some interesting history of knots. Especially that the | introduction of books led to sailors spending more time not | knotting. | SoftTalker wrote: | I've found that knowing half a dozen common knots has helped me a | lot more in day-to-day life than any of the mathematics I ever | learned. | andbberger wrote: | always relish a chance to share one of my favorite papers ever | | https://www2.math.upenn.edu/~ghrist/preprints/silnikov.pdf | mattpallissard wrote: | Kinda sorta related. I have a copy of ABOK on the coffee table | and a half dozen or so 6' lengths of 12 str and polyester | climbing line on the shelf. | | Not only is it practical to have a handful of knots and hitches | memorized, it's a great way to kill some time. When people come | over for dinner or drinks, the book and the cord often come out. | secondcoming wrote: | What, you knock your guests out with the book and finish them | off with the cord? | fnordpiglet wrote: | Because they are nerds. Duh. | captainclam wrote: | I see this comment getting downvoted, but I agree with the | sentiment; it suffices to say that if there a compelling | mathematical structure exists, there will be people studying | it. I imagine most graph theorists are hardly interested in the | applications of their field, they just happen to be studying a | structure which has much more intuitive practical applications | (social networks, molecules, etc). | ska wrote: | > there will be people studying it. | | "people studying something" == "nerds" ? | | [edit: i was probably too offhand about that, but what I | meant is that the fact that people are engaged in something | like this misses at least the conventional usage of "nerd", | if wasn't obvious] | actually_a_dog wrote: | No, "people studying abstract mathematical structures" == | "nerds." I say this as a proud nerd. | ska wrote: | Having known a ton of mathematicians, I'm not at all | convinced this holds (although it undoubtedly is a | subset) | klyrs wrote: | As a mathematician with a passing interest (read: no | results or publications) in knot theory, yeah, we're nerds | and proud. | fnordpiglet wrote: | Yes. Nerds are people who show more than normal interest in | non-mainstream subjects like Beyonces haircut. | mungoman2 wrote: | Interesting topic, but I don't find the answer to the headline in | the text. | MonkeyClub wrote: | You're sort of right. | | In one sense, the answer is right there in the subtitle: | | > knot theory has driven many findings in math and beyond. | | The article then proceeds with mentions of possible | applications in Chemistry, "to understand the makeup of matter" | (and makes no mention of protein folding overall - is knot | theory not used there?). | | But other than that, the paper is just a gentle introduction to | knots, with little to no direct relation to the title. | | Perhaps an editor thought a "Why ..." title was better/more | clickbaity? | gilleain wrote: | > protein folding overall - is knot theory not used there? | | To my knowledge, no. There has been some analysis done on | knots in folded proteins: | | https://www.umass.edu/microbio/chime/knots/index.htm | | (particularly by Prof. Taylor) but this is not the same as | using knot theory for analysing the folding process or for | predicting folds. | forgotpwd16 wrote: | The answer is in the concluding paragraph. | | >It began as an applied area of mathematics, with Thomson | attempting to use knots to understand the makeup of matter. As | that idea faded, it became an area of pure mathematics, a | branch of the intriguing and still unpractical domain of | topology. | | Basically because they're interesting. A better headline | will've been something like "knot landscape in mathematics" | since it covers the knot theory history and advancements. | PIENIKAKKA123 wrote: | IN hackin roblox | mathgenius wrote: | The article seems to be implying that mathematicians study knots | because there's lots of fun to be had. This is partly true, but | there's other more profound reasons. For example: higher | dimensional algebra. The "usual" algebra is just one dimensional, | but people have noticed that in many cases this is just a | projection (shadow) of higher dimensional systems, where the | symbols can interact in more than just a linear direction. And | once you get to three dimensions hey presto your algebra can get | knotted! | macrolocal wrote: | Also, knot complements are an important class of 3-manifolds. | taliesinb wrote: | I would love to have some pointers to the higher dimensional | algebra you're referring to. | shagie wrote: | https://youtu.be/EBWP1POPc2A and the associated knot theory | from that university - | https://www.youtube.com/c/MathatAndrews/search?query=knot | izhak wrote: | As for knots - they say there is a significant interception in | the center of the venn diagram of shibarists, scouts and | climbers, not that sure about mathematicians though | klyrs wrote: | I'm amused at the notion of a mathematical "shibarist" (I don't | know Japanese but I understand that -ka might be the proper | suffix). You've got some kinkster who wants to get tied up, but | the knot nerd keeps trying to compute invariants... | xeonmc wrote: | Artists do too. | jagged-chisel wrote: | But not for the same reasons | ska wrote: | Are you so sure? They are similar reasons, at least in part. | ok_dad wrote: | Mathematicians are half-artist, I think. Or, vice-versa. | jansan wrote: | Sailors and climbers too. | adolph wrote: | And Dons, really kept 3's Company together and Mayberry | loosened up ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-10-31 23:00 UTC)