[HN Gopher] Portmaster 1.0 - Open-Source Network Monitor and Pri...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Portmaster 1.0 - Open-Source Network Monitor and Privacy Firewall
        
       Author : dhaavi
       Score  : 214 points
       Date   : 2022-11-05 13:56 UTC (9 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (safing.io)
 (TXT) w3m dump (safing.io)
        
       | devnine wrote:
       | need a Mac version
        
       | dhaavi wrote:
       | CTO and Co-Founder of Safing here. We're super excited to
       | introduce version 1.0 of our network monitor and privacy firewall
       | - Portmaster! On 1.1. this year, Portmaster was shared on HN and
       | we hit front page [1]. With the help of our testers - many of
       | you! - we were able to mature and develop Portmaster to hit this
       | milestone.
       | 
       | We're on a mission to bring privacy back to the masses. Privacy
       | has to be easy & accessible for everyone, while hackers and
       | tinkerers should have the tools to customize everything to their
       | needs. So while Portmaster 1.0 is a big milestone, this is just
       | the start!
       | 
       | [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29761978 [2]:
       | https://star-history.com/#safing/portmaster&Date
        
         | csdvrx wrote:
         | Congrats!
         | 
         | Just one question: In the past, postmaster had problems with
         | WSL2.
         | 
         | I documented the issue and the solution:
         | https://www.reddit.com/r/safing/comments/ryioj7/portmaster_b...
         | 
         | Is it fixed now?
        
           | dhaavi wrote:
           | We still don't have first-class support for VMs, but it will
           | come.
        
             | csdvrx wrote:
             | Did you read the link?
             | 
             | Just add a PowerShell script at install time to exempt the
             | virtual network interfaces from Windows Firewall if WSL is
             | detected and the user agrees! It's super simple and easy.
        
         | OrvalWintermute wrote:
         | Looks intriguing. A few questions:
         | 
         | (1) Are you planning on having support for more than 5 devices
         | at a future point?
         | 
         | (2) Will you have any features to support parents protection of
         | their children?
         | 
         | (3) How easy is it to integrate Safing into a home security
         | stack, or an enterprise security stack?
         | 
         | (4) Have you considered a one-time unlimited buy-in level in
         | lieu of monthly?
         | 
         | (5) Is this coming for iOS & MacOS?
         | 
         | Thanks for pushing the privacy front.
        
           | dhaavi wrote:
           | Thanks for your interest.
           | 
           | (1) Are you planning on having support for more than 5
           | devices at a future point?
           | 
           | 5 devices is what we estimate 1 user has (avg max). If there
           | is demand, we will definitely add a plan to support more
           | devices (or users).
           | 
           | (2) Will you have any features to support parents protection
           | of their children?
           | 
           | We already collect NSFW filter lists to be activated in the
           | settings. Otherwise such features are tricky, as we need to
           | start protecting against the person in front of the device,
           | which is very hard. If you have suggestions, please share!
           | 
           | (3) How easy is it to integrate Safing into a home security
           | stack, or an enterprise security stack?
           | 
           | Can you elaborate on what exactly you have in mind? We don't
           | offer any integrations with other system out of the box yet.
           | We have APIs though that you can use.
           | 
           | (4) Have you considered a one-time unlimited buy-in level in
           | lieu of monthly?
           | 
           | We had a couple lifetime plans on our Kickstarter (years
           | ago). Right now, we don't have any plans for this. You can
           | pay in advance though - up to 4 years.
           | 
           | (5) Is this coming for iOS & MacOS?
           | 
           | Yes. Or, at least we will attempt. Going to be "fun" if Apple
           | continues their locking down strategy. Maybe the EU will
           | force them to open up until then. Expect at least 1-2 years
           | for this to land though.
        
             | mdip wrote:
             | Rather insightful on (2) with regard to:
             | > ... we need to start protecting against the person in
             | front of the device
             | 
             | My first thought was, "Oh, God, please don't". I'm a
             | parent, if I put that software on the computer it comes
             | with rules not to touch it; if it's touched, they know I'll
             | probably find out, ban them from it for a bit and return it
             | to them locked down in a manner that when I return it to
             | its original state, they won't touch it again. :o).
             | 
             | But then I thought of the other common reason this kind of
             | capability is added to software -- are you preparing for
             | the eventual future where you will _have_ to do this, not
             | to protect from a child removing the software, but to
             | protect from another app surreptitiously removing
             | Portmaster in order to bypass its protections?
        
               | dhaavi wrote:
               | Yes. Good points.
               | 
               | Well, the first thing we might do is just a "Only an
               | Administrator can make changes." setting where you only
               | admin accounts are allowed to change settings. This one
               | makes sense. Everything beyond that gets complicated and
               | easy to circumvent fast.
               | 
               | (I also think the original question was more about
               | blocking features and the likes.)
               | 
               | Protecting against other software is related, but also
               | different. We have some decent protection here, albeit
               | not against simply shutting Portmaster down.
        
         | slurpmaker wrote:
         | Looks like a nice project! What library are you using for a
         | front end here?
        
         | runlevel1 wrote:
         | Congrats on releasing 1.0! It looks very cool. A few questions
         | about Portmaster Unlimited and SPN:
         | 
         | 1. Does Safing own and operate all the exit nodes or can folks
         | add their own nodes to it?
         | 
         | 2. Are you self-hosting the exit nodes? If not, I'm curious
         | what cloud providers you use.
         | 
         | 3. Have you found egressing through a bunch of different
         | geolocated IPs for the same request triggers DDoS/anti-scraping
         | systems (like Cloudflare) more than usual?
        
           | dhaavi wrote:
           | Thanks!
           | 
           | 1. Does Safing own and operate all the exit nodes or can
           | folks add their own nodes to it?
           | 
           | Everyone can join. We also plan to compensate in some way in
           | the future. Docs: https://docs.safing.io/spn/hosting-a-
           | community-node
           | 
           | 2. Are you self-hosting the exit nodes? If not, I'm curious
           | what cloud providers you use.
           | 
           | We rent servers. If you have the SPN, you can click on every
           | server on the map and check where it is hosted. Currently
           | mainly Hetzner, OVH, Katamera, HostHatch. We regularly try
           | new providers, rent a couple servers and see how it goes.
           | 
           | 3. Have you found egressing through a bunch of different
           | geolocated IPs for the same request triggers DDoS/anti-
           | scraping systems (like Cloudflare) more than usual?
           | 
           | The client "pins" destination domains/IPs to an exit for an
           | hour (scoped per app) in order to get more stability here. We
           | had issues in the past.
        
       | toomanyusers wrote:
       | I'd really like to see more technical discussion of Safing's SPN
       | idea and implementation (https://safing.io/spn/). If I've
       | understood it correctly, it seems to be in-line with the general
       | trajectory of where Cloudflare is going with DNS privacy and
       | Apple is going with its relay service.
       | 
       | It seems obvious that VPN services should be split into Relay and
       | Exit services so that you don't have to necessarily trust a
       | single company not to collect and sell all your internet traffic.
        
         | dhaavi wrote:
         | The SPN (Safing Privacy Network) aims to fill the area between
         | VPNs and Tor. VPNs provide very little real privacy and Tor is
         | (outside Tor Browser) very difficult to setup and configure.
         | 
         | Yes, you are correct, there are similarities there. Except of
         | course that SPN is open source.
         | 
         | We do have a white paper:
         | https://safing.io/files/whitepaper/Gate17.pdf
         | 
         | And YES! I'd love to see more technical discussion of the SPN
         | too. So many things to unpack, to learn and improve.
        
         | g_p wrote:
         | From a DNS privacy perspective, ODOH (Oblivious DNS over HTTPS)
         | seems to achieve this at protocol level, with interoperability
         | between providers. While there are tunnelled VPN (separate
         | entry and exit), they always seem to be with the same provider.
         | The iCloud private relay design appears to avoid this.
         | 
         | It would be interesting to see where SPN goes, and more on how
         | it works, as you say.
        
         | wmf wrote:
         | It doesn't even define the acronym!
        
           | dhaavi wrote:
           | Sorry about that. It's "Safing Privacy Network".
        
       | stusmall wrote:
       | I evaluated this a few months ago and absolutely loved it. It was
       | more polished and easier to use than I expected. Since the
       | website made a big deal about it being alpha I went in expecting
       | a little pain.
       | 
       | The only major problem I hit was that everytime a snap would
       | update it would appear as a new application and I had to reapply
       | the rules. At the time there was a proposal for a change to fix
       | this but it hadn't been implemented yet. I think once that lands,
       | if it hasn't already, I'll be a loyal daily user.
       | 
       | EDIT: Adding GitHub issue link
       | https://github.com/safing/portmaster/issues/398
        
         | dhaavi wrote:
         | We have recently added a system to support these use cases. I
         | will see if we can add support for snap packages in the next
         | weeks. Now tracking this internally at CC#2632.
        
       | yewenjie wrote:
       | Still can't use it on NixOS :(
        
       | eckelhesten wrote:
       | Is this a per device client? Is it possible to say, run it on
       | Ubuntu as a server and have it handle the whole LAN?
        
         | dhaavi wrote:
         | This is client software. Everything is done locally.
         | 
         | Except of course for the SPN, which has a growing network of
         | servers to relay traffic.
        
       | drdaeman wrote:
       | Is this installed specifically on the endpoints or can it be
       | installed on a network gateway (my edge router/gateway is a
       | GNU/Linux machine) to provide analytics and security for the
       | whole LAN?
       | 
       | The website seems to be very light on any technical details,
       | doesn't give me a slightest idea how it operates. Looking at the
       | comments here I suspect it's a endpoint firewall using a VPN
       | (SPN) to tunnel all the traffic through a virtualized network
       | interface and apply rules and analytics to it.
        
         | dhaavi wrote:
         | It is installed on the endpoint.
         | 
         | It integrates with nfqueue on Linux and a kernel extension on
         | Windows. It does not use a virtual interface.
         | 
         | The SPN (Safing Privacy Network; VPN alternative) is optional.
         | 
         | More details on the docs: https://docs.safing.io/
        
       | ajolly wrote:
       | What's the performance impact on this, especially on windows?
       | 
       | Also what would happen if I installed a Windows gateway, using
       | routing and remote access services, and then installed portmaster
       | on that?
       | 
       | Overall this looks pretty awesome, and I'm excited to try it out.
       | 
       | Oh and can I use this in conjunction with wire guard? How does it
       | play with other vpns.
        
         | dhaavi wrote:
         | Q: What's the performance impact on this, especially on
         | windows?
         | 
         | Basically negligible. Secure DNS might be a bit slower and you
         | might feel some impact on low end devices.
         | 
         | Q: Also what would happen if I installed a Windows gateway,
         | using routing and remote access services, and then installed
         | portmaster on that?
         | 
         | You'd probably be cut off as incoming connections are blocked
         | by default. Please place a config with exceptions before
         | install or have (virtual) physical access when installing.
         | 
         | Q: Oh and can I use this in conjunction with wire guard? How
         | does it play with other vpns.
         | 
         | We have a whole page on that in the docs:
         | https://docs.safing.io/portmaster/install/status/vpn-compati...
        
       | Tarq0n wrote:
       | I've been using this for about a month and it's been excellent.
       | Actually dropped nextDNS for it, as my main need for nextDNS was
       | one windows desktop.
        
         | cynod wrote:
         | Was just reading their site and wondering about that myself.
         | But I use NextDNS on my router to cover all the devices on the
         | house and this seems individual client based.
         | 
         | Still, I can run it on my main machine.
         | 
         | The networking looks a great blend of onion routing and secured
         | connections. Really clever way of constantly changing a client
         | IP. As someone else noted it's like a client/outgoing version
         | of Cloudfare's DDoS mitigated network design.
        
         | Abishek_Muthian wrote:
         | Is this like OpenSnitch + PiHole combined?
        
           | ignoramous wrote:
           | Pretty much, yes.
        
             | Abishek_Muthian wrote:
             | I guess having it combined can have portability/mobility
             | benefits but other than that I doubt if the performance
             | benefits of OpenSnitch (or) ability to secure entire
             | network through PiHole is worth replacing.
        
               | ignoramous wrote:
               | You won't be wrong about that, but I like to think of
               | PortMaster as more of an open-source Glasswire
               | replacement that can also run on Linux. It is an
               | impressive piece of software nevertheless.
        
       | byteshock wrote:
       | I remember trying out Portmaster on Windows earlier this year. I
       | think Portmaster was running a local DNS server to see what
       | connections were being made. This interfered with my VPN,
       | Mullvad, which was trying to use a remote DNS server.
       | 
       | Does Portmaster still require a local DNS server? I've been an
       | avid user of Glasswire for years and it works flawlessly with my
       | VPN. But i would love to switch to a open source alternative.
        
         | dhaavi wrote:
         | Portmaster still (and probably always will) require a local DNS
         | server. Why? Because there is not always and will be less ways
         | in the future to find out which Domain an IP address belongs
         | to.
         | 
         | GlassWire will probably become quite blind as soon as TLS1.3 is
         | rolled out and working as intended.
         | 
         | I will look into Mullvad compatibility again in the coming
         | weeks. I think they also improved some stuff on their side.
         | 
         | User from 2 weeks ago: "Can confirm that Portmaster V.1.0.0
         | with Mullvard V2022.4 DNS set to 127.0.0.1 and the same setting
         | on the netwerk controller both can life together." from
         | https://github.com/safing/portmaster/issues/313
        
           | byteshock wrote:
           | Awesome, thank you for the reply. Will try out Portmaster
           | again!
        
       | nohankyou wrote:
       | I remember using Postmasters (PM2E) for router serial
       | connectivity, good times.
        
         | NateLawson wrote:
         | Yeah, the ISP I founded in 1995 (elite.net) was a PM2ER for
         | both dialup and routing with a Pentium 90 as the shell & web
         | server. We quickly hit the 30 line limit and went up to the
         | PRI-based Portmaster models. Fun and exciting times, just
         | bringing a rural community online for the first time ever.
        
       | jonhohle wrote:
       | Ooh, an article about portmaster(8)! Oh, not portmaster(8)
       | 
       | 0 -
       | https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=portmaster&sektion...
        
         | js2 wrote:
         | Also not PortMaster.
         | 
         | https://archive.org/details/h42_Livingston_Enterprises_PortM...
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | beezle wrote:
         | Lol I was just thinking the same thing. Why do I think this is
         | going to end badly?
        
       | agilob wrote:
       | Yghm... can I run it on kubernetes?
        
         | dhaavi wrote:
         | It's a software for clients / desktops.
        
           | agilob wrote:
           | Can't be run network wide on kubernetes or router? Then it's
           | not a competitor to pihole?
        
             | dhaavi wrote:
             | Well, that depends on the use case. You might call it an
             | indirect competitor.
        
             | senden9 wrote:
             | Right. Other use case. PiHole is setup for network
             | normally. This solution is personal desktop firewall. So it
             | has more access to information, but is also easier
             | breakable (like break thru) for "bad" software on your PC.
        
       | deluxeroyale wrote:
       | Been looking for something like this for my windows computer.
       | Little Snitch has been invaluable over the years but never found
       | anything that covers it's features for windows
        
         | alibert wrote:
         | If you are looking for a simple and light firewall (but still
         | better than Windows Firewall), I recommend using Simplewall. It
         | does not require a kernel extension and works with the API
         | provided by Windows to do network filtering.
         | 
         | https://github.com/henrypp/simplewall
        
           | dhaavi wrote:
           | We have a blog post about this, if anyone is curious:
           | https://safing.io/blog/2022/04/11/portmaster-vs-simplewall/
        
       | DavideNL wrote:
       | > _Please note that pretty much all the DNS leak detection tests
       | by the VPN providers will be a false positive, as the only thing
       | they check is if you are using their DNS servers. Rest assured
       | that your DNS queries are well protected by the Portmaster and
       | there is no need to be concerned._ " [1]
       | 
       | That's a confusing statement... does this mean they change your
       | DNS server/provider by default, if you are using a VPN?
       | 
       | [1] https://docs.safing.io/portmaster/install/status/vpn-
       | compati...
        
         | byteshock wrote:
         | I think it's because SPN uses a different IP/node per
         | connection you make. DNS leak detection tests will ask your
         | browser to resolve unique subdomains. If the DNS server that
         | requests the lookup is different from your connecting IP to the
         | website, they will say you have a DNS leak.
         | 
         | https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/42752/how-does-...
        
           | dhaavi wrote:
           | That would be true if would be resolving all DNS yourself.
           | Nowadays everyone uses a recursive resolver. See my other
           | answer for details about this case.
        
         | dhaavi wrote:
         | Pretty much all VPNs use their own DNS servers. Their "DNS Leak
         | Tests" just check if queries come from that DNS server.
         | 
         | Portmaster overrides any custom DNS server and enforces the
         | ones the user set - or are set by default. This "breaks" the
         | VPN leak test.
         | 
         | You'd need to use a leak test from the DNS provider for it to
         | work.
         | 
         | Thanks for the feedback. I will look into improving the text.
        
           | DavideNL wrote:
           | > " _overrides any custom DNS server and enforces the ones
           | the user set - or are set by default_ "
           | 
           | If Portmaster " _enforces DNS servers with the ones that are
           | set_ ", after installing Portmaster and without the user
           | changing anything, i'd say that's a decrease of privacy;
           | 
           | Your VPN provider can see your traffic in any case (even when
           | you're not using their DNS server.) So, if Portmaster would
           | change this to whatever your default is (Cloudflare, Google,
           | etc.), people are then suddenly sharing their DNS requests
           | with yet another 3th party.
        
             | dhaavi wrote:
             | There is a welcome screen that informs you of Portmaster
             | handling and securing DNS queries with the option to change
             | the provider.
             | 
             | But especially with a VPN the privacy is increased as it
             | effectively becomes DNS-over-TLS/HTTPS-over-VPN. The VPN
             | still sees your destination IP addresses, so the privacy
             | improvement is not increased by a lot, but still.
        
               | DavideNL wrote:
               | > with the option to change the provider.
               | 
               | Ah right, that sounds good. So the user is aware of it.
               | 
               | > _But especially with a VPN the privacy is increased as
               | it effectively becomes DNS-over-TLS /HTTPS-over-VPN._
               | 
               | I disagree; VPN providers use an internal IP as DNS
               | server and your connection to this DNS server goes
               | through a secured VPN tunnel anyway.
               | 
               | So, by sharing your DNS requests with an external 3th
               | party you gain nothing, and it's even a decrease of your
               | privacy since now Google/Cloudflare/etc collects all
               | these requests.
        
       | tfigment wrote:
       | I've been using for about 6 months and I think its a good
       | product. I suddenly needed a new firewall as Comodo Firewall
       | doesn't work well with VPN I have to use (it cannot block
       | anything). This stepped up like a champ in preventing unwanted
       | networking behavior from Microsoft and others. The Notify Task
       | has some times been weird but 1.0 seems to work well for me. The
       | fact that i can point at my local DNScrypt instance is nice. I
       | need to explore SPN more and see if it would work better than VPN
       | for me or not.
        
       | ike0790 wrote:
       | This is awesome. Definitely gonna check it out...
        
       | jeroenhd wrote:
       | Definitely one of the best firewalls for normal people on Linux.
       | (g)UFW is nice and easy but very basic. Portmaster is a lot
       | closer to the firewalls you may find for Windows that list
       | applications and their statistics/configuration.
       | 
       | My only problem with it is that under heavy load the DoH server
       | dies or gets stuck at 50% CPU for me. It also hangs my custom
       | DoT/DoH solution for some reason but that's not a Portmaster
       | problem.
        
         | dhaavi wrote:
         | Thanks! That's exactly what we are aiming for!
         | 
         | About your DNS issues: Have you opened an issue on GitHub yet?
        
           | jeroenhd wrote:
           | I haven't had time to debug this issue yet, it mostly occurs
           | when I'm busy with more important stuff so I usually just
           | restart the service one or twice to get the process to
           | behave.
           | 
           | I'll try to remember to collect the logs next time it happens
           | so I can open a useful issue.
        
       | mcc1ane wrote:
       | What's SPN?
        
         | toomanyusers wrote:
         | I found a blog post (https://safing.io/blog/2022/09/06/spn-vs-
         | vpns/), but you have to go fairly far down the page (to the
         | header "Cryptographic Identity Protection") to begin to get the
         | gist of what it is.
         | 
         | "This was originally invented for Tor and is called Onion
         | Routing. This way, every server in the chain only knows the
         | previous and the next hop. No server ever knows who you are AND
         | where you are going to."
         | 
         | "As VPNs are centralized, all their servers are operated by
         | only one entity - the VPN provider itself. They can, therefore,
         | monitor all you traffic and see what you are up to. This is why
         | they tout their "No Logging" policies so loudly, because they
         | know they can see everything."
         | 
         | "SPN on the other hand invites the community to join the
         | network and strengthen it by adding diversity to the operators
         | of the network. This way - in addition to the cryptographic
         | protections - it is made almost impossible that anyone will
         | ever be able to track you through the SPN."
         | 
         | It sounds like it is a next-gen VPN service which addresses the
         | shortcomings of the current VPN services by splitting the
         | service into relays and exits, each with limited knowledge and
         | each potentially operated by different parties.
        
           | dhaavi wrote:
           | CTO of Safing here.
           | 
           | Came back to answer the question and you beat me to it!
           | Thanks!
           | 
           | SPN (Safing Privacy Network) aims to fill the area between
           | VPNs and Tor. VPNs provide very little real privacy and Tor
           | is (outside Tor Browser) very difficult to setup and
           | configure.
           | 
           | With the combination with the Portmaster (which is also
           | firewall), we provide superior privacy to any VPN and offer a
           | 1-click install for a software that you cannot mis-configure.
           | 
           | If you have any questions, please ask!
        
         | stusmall wrote:
         | Another product from them: https://safing.io/spn/
        
         | xcambar wrote:
         | This.
         | 
         | I have followed multiple links, never able to find the
         | expansion of the acronym. So weird.
        
           | dhaavi wrote:
           | Huh. Thanks, I will check that we explain that better.
        
           | janka102 wrote:
           | I also couldn't find it on their website, but their GitHub
           | says it means Safing Privacy Network.
           | https://github.com/safing/spn/
        
       | Matl wrote:
       | Is there a way to use this as 'just a firewall'? Not touching my
       | DNS config or preventing VPNs from setting their own etc.?
        
         | pyinstallwoes wrote:
         | Yea I've done that.
        
       | metadat wrote:
       | Are there any plans for a Mac version?
       | 
       | Pretty cool that both Windows and Linux both are supported and
       | already exist. Keep up the good work!
       | 
       | I also appreciate the easy to read and clear privacy policy about
       | what telemetry and data this SaSS platform collects and how it is
       | handled.
       | 
       | https://safing.io/privacy/#article-1-where-we-collect-datapi...
        
         | CharlesW wrote:
         | For macOS I can strongly recommend Little Snitch. It's not open
         | source, but I like that it's not subscription software and
         | doesn't collect personal data.
         | https://www.obdev.at/products/littlesnitch/index.html
        
           | zikduruqe wrote:
           | I've been running LuLu and it works great.
           | 
           | https://objective-see.org/products/lulu.html
        
             | CharlesW wrote:
             | I love everything Objective-See makes too. Glad you
             | mentioned them!
        
             | krono wrote:
             | FYI: It comes with opt-out Sentry crash reporting.
             | 
             | Edit: Shipping such a component enabled by default might be
             | unexpected for applications of this nature and easily
             | overlooked, which is why I mention it.
        
           | cvwright wrote:
           | Why is "not subscription software" necessarily a good thing?
           | 
           | Don't you want to be the customer rather than the product?
        
             | metadat wrote:
             | Little Snitch still costs money, it's just a different
             | licensing model. It's not SaSS, so only a one-time fee to
             | purchase for the tool.
             | 
             | The reason I'm open to paying a monthly fee for a SaSS
             | offering is to keep getting new features and timely
             | security updates, and support ensuring the recurring
             | expense aspects of the service can stay alive. It's not
             | entirely clear to me yet why PortMaster needs to be a SaSS,
             | but it's not implausible.
             | 
             | I don't have any Windows or Linux desktop machines in
             | regular use currently, looking forward to trying this out
             | once the Mac version exists.
        
               | CharlesW wrote:
               | > _The reason I 'm open to paying a monthly fee for a
               | SaSS offering..._
               | 
               | To clarify, I'm absolutely _not_ subscription shaming,
               | and I understand that startups are effectively forced to
               | use a SaaS model in order to attract investors.
        
             | CharlesW wrote:
             | > _Why is "not subscription software" necessarily a good
             | thing?_
             | 
             | I personally consider that a "pro". You may not have
             | experienced subscription fatigue yet, which is great.
             | 
             | > _Don't you want to be the customer rather than the
             | product?_
             | 
             | You may have misunderstood -- Little Snitch is a _paid_
             | product that collects no data.
        
               | cvwright wrote:
               | That makes sense. Thanks!
        
         | simjnd wrote:
         | They have considered it and say they will invest in it "once
         | they have the resources" [1]. So I wouldn't expect it anytime
         | soon at all.
         | 
         | [1]: https://docs.safing.io/portmaster/install/status/mac
         | 
         | EDIT: Added link to source
        
       | maxcx wrote:
       | Pretty interesting. Would love to see if users can choose their
       | own servers as the underlying identity pool. PS: SPN: Safing
       | Privacy Network, https://github.com/safing/spn
        
         | dhaavi wrote:
         | You can add your own servers to the network as community nodes.
         | [0]
         | 
         | For privacy, you never want to be the only person using a
         | server.
         | 
         | [0] https://docs.safing.io/spn/hosting-a-community-node
        
       | spansoa wrote:
       | I installed this about six months ago on Ubuntu 18 and it hanged
       | when I launched. Has this been ironed out? I might try again. If
       | I'm having issues, I'll submit an issue on Github. Was it tested
       | on Ubuntu 18? BTW: I have to use Ubuntu 18 since version 20 is
       | not compatible with my machine (some BS about NVIDIA drivers
       | crashing the OS)
        
         | dhaavi wrote:
         | We have improved a lot since then. Please try again and open an
         | issue on GitHub if something does not work - as you said.
         | 
         | Linux install options:
         | https://docs.safing.io/portmaster/install/linux
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-11-05 23:00 UTC)