[HN Gopher] FTX hacker identity discovered by Kraken Exchange team ___________________________________________________________________ FTX hacker identity discovered by Kraken Exchange team Author : throwup Score : 70 points Date : 2022-11-12 21:31 UTC (1 hours ago) (HTM) web link (cryptoslate.com) (TXT) w3m dump (cryptoslate.com) | mjr00 wrote: | At this point you have to apply Occam's Razor... it's hard to | imagine this is anyone but SBF trying to liquidate as much as he | possibly can before moving to a country without an extradition | treaty. He's allegedly also trying to sell his stake in RobinHood | through back channels[0], which would support this. | | And I mean, at this point he's so legally fucked it doesn't | really matter if he gets caught doing this, so there's no need to | be subtle about it. For him, sloppy is fine if it's quick. | | [0] https://twitter.com/Loopifyyy/status/1591489987459297282 | lvass wrote: | s/SBF/SBF or one of his 10 polyamorous roommates. | babyshake wrote: | This whole thing is so bizarre. It is almost like Brian | Armstrong or Jesse Powell exit scamming their respective | exchanges, or perhaps my impression of SBF has been completely | wrong. If SBF does intend to be a fugitive, does he really | think this is going to end up OK for him? | nemo44x wrote: | He's probably in the panic/negotiation phase of it all. He | knows he's cooked but possibly he can escape with enough | money to pay the right people in the right places what they | need to secure passage for himself. | shiado wrote: | Your impression was wrong. Zhu Su of 3AC infamy had the | evidence sitting on Twitter since 2019 and nobody cared. | | https://twitter.com/zhusu/status/1116945693946433536 | sillysaurusx wrote: | He really thought FTX US was solvent less than 24 hours | before declaring bankruptcy. Either he's a fraud or he's | clueless. Either way, he's not thinking, let alone whether | he'll end up ok. | | I'm struggling to phrase this in a high brow way, but being | the son of powerful parents might be a factor too. It's | possible that this is the first time in his life that anyone | is telling him not to do X for an X he really wanted to do. | | Him being the second largest donor to the Democratic Party | will really test the rule of law. Does it apply to the | powerful? We'll see. | wslh wrote: | I think jail is the most secure place to him, IMHO if he | doesn't end up in jail someone will kill him, he screwed good | and bad actors. It is not like Madoff screwing people who | will not retaliate at the violent level. | babyshake wrote: | If you believe the theories about Epstein etc, jail is not | always a secure place if people want you dead. | mjr00 wrote: | > If SBF does intend to be a fugitive, does he really think | this is going to end up OK for him? | | Honestly, if he manages to sneak to Laos or the Maldives, | even with a mere $100m or so? Yeah he'd most likely be fine, | especially if he lays low. A similar example at smaller scale | is Sam Jain[0] who ran eFront in the early 00s; he defrauded | businesses of tens of millions and ran off somewhere. He's | been a fugitive for over a decade but still has multiple | millions of dollars to life off of. | | Biggest difference is Jain was mainly defrauding businesses, | whereas SBF defrauded billionaires... wherever he goes, I'm | sure 24/7 armed security is going to be on his shopping list. | | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jain_Shaileshkumar | papito wrote: | The U.S. law enforcement really starts the Consequence Train | up if the _wrong_ people get screwed. Ironically, the | billionaires who seek justice for their scammers are the ones | who also spend a ton of money gutting the government of its | power of prosecution and oversight. | idop wrote: | He shouldn't bother. Soon he'll be offered a book deal, a movie | deal and an exclusive interview deal that will net him enough | money to live comfortably for at least a few decades. Not to | mention that after his not-so-significant prison term he'll | become a motivational speaker at 50 grand a pop. | rippercushions wrote: | Citation needed for "not so significant", people behind | lesser Ponzis have gotten decades in jail. | rafale wrote: | In some states like NY, the money you make from | writing/talking about your crimes go to the victims of your | crime. That's why Inventing Anna (Netflix series inspired by | true events) didn't make any money for the real (but not so | real) Anna Delvey. | flylib wrote: | he could be looking at long time in jail, no one wants to | associate with him at this point | ldjkfkdsjnv wrote: | I bet in a few years he raises VC money for a new venture | SilverBirch wrote: | Yeah, I think the question "Does Marc Andreesen associate | with scam artists" has been quite conclusively answered by | now. I can just see it now "Well he built an amazing | business last time..." | sillysaurusx wrote: | This is actually "an announcement of an announcement." It's not | publicly known who the F the FTX hacker is. | | It's good to see them making so many mistakes. It'll really test | the theory that if you commit a huge crime and get a 15 year | prison sentence, will it be worth it if you lock your millions | away where no one can find them but you? | | I don't think so. Even a brain wallet would be hard to siphon | from afterwards without anyone noticing. | standapart wrote: | What if this was never about getting the money out of the crypto | markets. Could it simply be about minimizing how many of the | assets the bankruptcy could liquidate all at once? | | It may take a long time to recover these funds. Remember seeing | that slippage was as much as 50% on some of the transactions, a | permanent loss. | | No one still in crypto wanted to see the liquidation happen. | MangoCoffee wrote: | 1. Sequoia removed its glowing 13,000-word profile of Sam | Bankman-Fried | | https://www.businessinsider.com/ftx-investor-sequoia-removes... | | 2. NAS Daily on FTX | | https://twitter.com/nasdaily/status/1590027230281093120?s=20... | | 3. The World Economic forum: FTX | | https://www.weforum.org/organizations/ftx | | 4. White House Monitoring FTX Collapse, Calls for Crypto | Regulation | | https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-11-12/white-hou... | | what a whirlwind. there are more FTX chaos on Twitter. | metadat wrote: | Is there an archive link of the Sequoia page? | paxys wrote: | Any reason to believe that "Kraken" is legitimate and not just | part of the grift, or even a different grift in itself? | zoklet-enjoyer wrote: | Yes | colechristensen wrote: | Kraken is based in SF and has various US regulatory attachments | and thus auditing obligations. It is specifically not an | offshore operation. It's also been around for a long time. | | Among crypto exchanges Kraken is definitely on the legitimate | side of the spectrum. | | Somebody should create a kind of credit rating for exchanges to | rate their risk and legitimacy. | jefftk wrote: | And a week ago you would have said this about FTX.US, no? | zmaurelius wrote: | Kraken regularly publishes proof of reserves. I don't recommend | keeping funds on exchanges as a rule, but I don't feel stressed | out leaving a percentage of my holdings there for an extended | duration. | cycrutchfield wrote: | Do they publish proof of liabilities too? | gruez wrote: | Insofar as each client's deposits? Yes. | | >Any client can independently verify that their balance was | included in the Proof of Reserves audit by comparing select | pieces of data with the Merkle root. | | https://www.kraken.com/proof-of-reserves | zmaurelius wrote: | I believe only Coinbase publishes liabilities at the | moment. In my opinion, Coinbase is the gold standard due to | being a publicly traded company and Kraken carries more | risk. | QuadmasterXLII wrote: | I mean we all know who the hacker is lol | zmaurelius wrote: | It is kind of strange how unsophisticated the hack ended up | being. I feel like SBF would have pulled off something with a | bit more finesse. | zoklet-enjoyer wrote: | thr0wawayf00 wrote: | Maybe I'm just a cynic, but I find the community's pursuit of | this individual's identity pretty interesting given the pro- | privacy stance of crypto. | | Everyone cares about privacy until a crime is committed, and then | we all want to know. And we leave it up to folks at companies | like Kraken to tell us what they find. | rippercushions wrote: | This has almost nothing to do with crypto. There's no "hurr | durr code is law" clever hacking involved, the money was | straight up stolen from a centralized exchange in the digital | equivalent of a bank robbery and is now being laundered in | plain sight. | lordnacho wrote: | They got their Tron from Kraken apparently. Seems a bit amateur | but it's so dumb it must be true. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-11-12 23:00 UTC)