[HN Gopher] What ever happened to webrings? (2015) ___________________________________________________________________ What ever happened to webrings? (2015) Author : susam Score : 41 points Date : 2022-11-13 17:34 UTC (1 days ago) (HTM) web link (hover.blog) (TXT) w3m dump (hover.blog) | quickthrower2 wrote: | Webrings were never meant to be in place of search. Search | existed in 1994, in various crappy ways. I searched for things, | and I occasionally click webrings links. Webring is more like an | ad exchange for mostly non-profit personal sites. | [deleted] | PhasmaFelis wrote: | Webrings died because they were made for personal homepages, and | social media killed personal homepages. | patorjk wrote: | I remember joining these back in the day. They were actually | pretty good at driving traffic to niche sites. | | I used one about 15 years ago to help promote an ASCII Art app I | wrote (I'm still a member too). I just checked and the webring | still exists (http://artcode.org/ascii/index.php). Many of the | sites that were members are now gone, but some of them still | exist. Kind of cool that it's still around, it's a nice look into | the past. | shagie wrote: | Looking at it and the links... | | http://web.archive.org/web/20150915200650/http://dir.webring... - | oh, that looks neat... but then following to its current version, | it appears to be bought by some other company and then left to | rot (no content there). | | And then... | | > Or better yet, check out Hover's very own collection of random | old websites, Retro Site Ninja! | | http://web.archive.org/web/20150916233518/http://retrosite.n... | | That looks neat... curl: (6) Could not resolve | host: retrosite.ninja | | Oh. | rr888 wrote: | I always thought Google PageRank would penalize you for a webring | as its often from an unrelated site so could count as a spam | link. | genghisjahn wrote: | Where was that cool site I saw yesterday? | Click...nope....click...nope....click...nope...click...that's it. | | Webrings were like the 8-track tape of the internet. | stavros wrote: | Google version: Where was that cool site I saw yesterday? | Click... nope. Guess it's gone. | treve wrote: | indieweb has webrings: https://indieweb.org/indiewebring | adventured wrote: | What happened to them? | | Webrings were a form of social network and modern centralized | social networks with media capabilities ate them. | | MySpace, Friendster, Flickr, Facebook, Instagram, Digg, Reddit | and all the rest - they depopulated webrings, which drastically | reduced the value in the network rings. | | People have N time in the day to post content. They chose the | easier, heavily networked publishing systems to use. | dang wrote: | We changed the url from | http://web.archive.org/web/20150920010813/http://www.hover.c... | to the current version of the original source. | | Please don't post archive.org links unless there's really no | alternative. | | " _Please submit the original source. If a post reports on | something found on another site, submit the latter._ " | | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html | advisedwang wrote: | This article seems mostly focused on the business webrings, but | what about the core idea? | | I think it was probably doomed by sites not wanting outbound | links, either because of pagerank, fear of loosing traffic, | looking unprofessional, or the appearance of an affiliation. The | inbound traffic was not worth the outbound traffic. | cragfar wrote: | I could be remembering it wrong, but I'm pretty sure Google's | webscraper was far superior to basically any other search | engines, and that along with it's ranking algorithm killed | whatever need for webrings there were. I remember having to | tell Yahoo about my website and they said their bot would look | at it in a couple of days. | Mountain_Skies wrote: | I operated a webring for my university, eventually breaking it | into separate rings for students, alumni, and fans of the | sports programs. The biggest issue was people who would sign up | but never would insert the required code into their page for | the navigation to appear. In most cases, it didn't seem like | they were trying to be freeloaders getting inbound traffic | while prohibiting outbound but rather that writing HTML was | still relatively new and many people were following along with | tutorials, making simple substitutions for colors and adding | individual links but got confused when they needed to add a big | block of html table code. A few were semi-freeloading in that | they insisted the inbound link be to their index.html but the | ring code that enabled outbound links were hidden at the bottom | of another page. | | There were various scripts created for managing such issues but | it didn't seem worth the hassle so I ended up letting the rings | decay until eventually pulling the plug when leaving for grad | school. | tommek4077 wrote: | I didn't even know webring.org but used quite a lot own build | webrings until the mid 2000s. Probably something like this has a | chance again as google does not work anymore to find multiple | niche sites. | nonrandomstring wrote: | I read; | | > If the words GeoCities, Excite or Alta Vista mean anything to | you, then chances are that the word 'webring' triggers a sudden | pang of nostalgia. | | but cannot help but hear a voice from 2032, saying; | "If the words Like, Follow, and Tweet mean anything to you, then | chances are that the words "Social Media" triggers a sudden pang | of nostalgia." | | If nostalgia is a permanent feature of the Internet, so is the | insufferable parochialism of the present. | aaron695 wrote: | a-dub wrote: | was just recently wondering what happened to blogrolls... | amadeuspagel wrote: | The decline of an idea should not be blamed on a single service. | Why did no one else make some better service for webrings? | miohtama wrote: | Because search engines (Google) and centralised blogging | services (WordPress, Tumblr, Flickr, later Twitter, Facebook, | etc.) offer better user experience and discoverability than | webrings. | stavros wrote: | I really like webrings, I wonder why they aren't as popular any | more. I wonder if I should create something that lets you make | your own webrings, just define a list of sites, add the link, and | that's it. | 1337shadow wrote: | Usually those are paid for by webmasters, such as with | linkfarm.net | stavros wrote: | Hm, but that's not a webring, is it? A webring links from one | site to the next, but linkfarm (as I understand it) links | from multiple sites to one. | hoherd wrote: | I think Awesome lists kind of fit this bill. I know it's not | the same UX as a webring, but it seems like having an index | view would suffice. It's more utilitarian and less | experiential, but would be much easier to manage and track. | | Did webrings have more features than just the list of sites, | like voting and stuff? I honestly don't remember. | c7b wrote: | > A webring was prided on offering a free and decentralized | experience. | | Sounds great, and I imagine they were useful for the 90's web to | jump from one Star Wars fansite to the next (which would have | been much harder to find otherwise), but frankly, I didn't feel a | great desire to see them now. I guess that mode of browsing is | simply not how I use the web nowadays, nor I imagine many other | people. | Melatonic wrote: | Maybe this is the direction we need to go in, however. Most | people now do not type in URL's and a search engine becomes | their single point of knowledge or discovery (or social media). | Do we really want that much power in a single entity? | | What we might need are modern web rings - an easy to setup | software that is plug in play for anyone who sets up a simple | site - and that then can be configured to point to other sites. | Maybe with a universal login for that "ring" | c7b wrote: | I agree, I also often think that the web should become more | decentralized again, but the thing is, it also needs to be | fun to use. Mastodon is an interesting experiment in that | regard. | | Maybe one could argue that link aggregators like HN are sort | of a spiritual successor to the webring concept? You also go | from one interesting site to the next, but you also have a | social aspect, which makes it a lot more fun. The | centralization is still quite strong, though. Just wondering | whether you could keep the social element but make it more of | a 'pull' thing, like webrings were, than a 'push' from a | central site like HN. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-11-14 23:00 UTC)