[HN Gopher] Z-library founders arrested in Argentina ___________________________________________________________________ Z-library founders arrested in Argentina Author : cft Score : 410 points Date : 2022-11-17 09:13 UTC (13 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.justice.gov) (TXT) w3m dump (www.justice.gov) | sva_ wrote: | This makes me worried about LibGen. It would be an incredible | loss to humanity to see these libraries go for good. | PointyFluff wrote: | I thought Fahrenheit 451 was supposed to be fiction... | 1970-01-01 wrote: | They were arrested for a lot more than copyright infringement: | | Criminal Copyright | | Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud | | Wire Fraud | | Money Laundering Conspiracy | p1peridine wrote: | > Records obtained by law enforcement from Google LLC ("Google") | and Amazon, Inc. ("Amazon") provide evidence of the defendant | [name]'s control of Z-Library. | | They clearly haven't read any "OPSEC 101"-books. Rookie mistake. | jhvkjhk wrote: | They are so young! Does anyone know what will happen to them | after the arrestment? I sincerely think they are doing charity. | blakblakarak wrote: | No doubt they'll be chucked in a supermax prison in the arse- | end of nowhere for fifty years. | nathancahill wrote: | They'll charge them like Aaron Swartz, where each piece of | material is a separate count against them. The years of | sentencing and fines will be astronomical. | andsoitis wrote: | > I sincerely think they are doing charity | | By limiting downloads (artificial scarcity)? | | By charging for pirated works? | inshadows wrote: | They charge for bandwidth, server cycles and rent. | andsoitis wrote: | So they don't profit? | inshadows wrote: | Who cares. Don't be a free-loader. | skyyler wrote: | I find it interesting that zlib is supposed to be | compensated for their servers but the authors aren't | supposed to be compensated for their writings. | | Personally, I'm in support of zlib / libgen / other | illegalist libraries. But it is kind of funny to see | where the morality lies on this. | [deleted] | tartoran wrote: | Not many textbooks require a new edition every year and it wasn't | really as bad for the secondhand market where the original buyers | would pay exhorbitant prices for textbooks but would recover some | of it by selling them as used. | | With new editions every semester they want to extract as much | money from students which I find appalling, students are kindof | poor on average. Piracy is an outcome to that | trabant00 wrote: | What happened to "you get what you pay for" and "if you're not | the customer you are the product"? We already know what happens | with free content on the internet: it turns to shit. And no, | wikipedia or open source are not models you can apply to most | books. The ones you can, we already have them: free programming | books and the sorts. | | Do you want books to be the next low effort, low quality, ads | ridden, ideology pushing, click bait, spam, micro transactions, | gambling medium? Asking for them to be free (as in beer) is the | way to go. | | Another thing: as a long time pirate from a poor country myself I | never understood the need to morally justify piracy. I do it | because I want to spend money elsewhere, not because I feel it is | my right or it should be. I do it because I can and I profit from | it. My head will not explode with cognitive dissonance if I | accept I am wronging others to help myself. | dartharva wrote: | > Do you want books to be the next low effort, low quality, ads | ridden, ideology pushing, click bait, spam, micro transactions, | gambling medium? | | Were books and works that came before copyright law was | invented "low effort" and "low quality"? What kind of mental | gymnastics does it take to equate IP laws with creativity? It's | rather _with_ and _because of_ copyright laws that literature | and educational content have gone down the drain. It 's _now_ | that many books get written with the sole intention of it | getting consoomed by as many people as possible, riddled with | dark patterns and cringy styles. Information and ideas are NOT | your private property if you make them public. | dchuk wrote: | (Hypothetically) | | Couldn't this concept be built out in a much more decentralized | way, where there's a desktop app you install that is basically a | BitTorrent client and a search interface, and then the app | synchronizes with all other desktop apps to keep a SQLite | database updated with all of the book meta data, and then each | user also contributes some amount of disk space (let's say 1gb) | that the app automatically manages storing some amount of the | network's book files in (maybe even encrypted somehow, or | fragments of book files, so you never actually have a complete | file on any given machine). | | So basically a big torrent mesh with redundant, fragmented | storage of book files everywhere. People can upload a book, the | app shreds it up and broadcasts to the network, enough other apps | sync those fragments on their end to make it "permanently" on the | network (statistically at least). | | The metadata can't possibly be that big for a million books in a | SQLite database. Users would search against their local SQLite | DB, and for a book they want to download, it's just normal | BitTorrent downloads in the background. Run it all through TOR or | similar. | | Thoughts? I am only a user of all of the above tech, never | written software for any of it. Is it possible to build a | distributed and resilient file sharing system like this? | chis wrote: | You also need a system to manage books coming in, separating | spam/viruses from real content. You either need a centralized | source verifying books (zlib and usenet approach) or some kind | of voting system like thepiratebay. If it's a centralized | source, that'll be the weak point to take down, and voting | systems won't work well for unpopular books. | | Last I checked there were some pretty good usenet servers | flying under the radar with even more books than z-lib, | manually curated. So there might not be enough demand for your | idea at the moment. | rex_lupi wrote: | There's IPFS | wellareyousure wrote: | robomartin wrote: | My first thought on this is that the people who download books | from these sites were never going to buy them in the first place. | This is particularly true if they engaged in downloading dozens | or hundreds of books. In other words, not sure just how much | money anyone lost because of the existence of these sites. | | If someone is never going to buy what you sell (let's say they | can't afford it) and they are able to get it for free in digital | form, you did not incur any expenses and you did not lose any | money. | | I am not trying to justify IP theft, just trying to understand | the financial reality of the matter. | | At the extreme is the case of an author who produces a great book | after over a year of hard work only to see 100% of the books | stolen in digital form. The author has a household to support and | goes without income. | xtracto wrote: | A lot of the typical and expected takes for these sort of | discussions: | | - on one side, people who are in favour of the arrests , because | they see their a activities as crimes. They have point | | - on the other side people that one way or another, believe that | the distribution of the information should be free in some sense. | Justifications always abound. A d it's Ok | | I offer a third take: Theres no reason why authors should be | perpetually paid for the work of 500/1000 hours, or whatever time | it took them to write the books; research time included. | Publishing a book should give authors, editors and related | parties the compensation for their worked time at a fair hourly | wage. The same way you a I are compensated hourly. | | After that, the only cost of books should be distribution costs, | which nowadays are near to 0 with p2p and similar. | | The fact that the work output of some people is intended to be | overpaid indefinitely, while the output of the rest of us is only | paid hourly, is what's unfair. | dmitryminkovsky wrote: | Authors and creators are not wage workers. They are taking on | the risk that their creations may yield them nothing. In that | sense they are entrepreneurs/investors, and along with the risk | of failure they have the prospect of great "upside". So I think | the question is whether you think there should be limits to how | much you can earn, etc, in general. | blairbeckwith wrote: | Does this apply to everyone? If I build and sell an indie | software product, should I only be able to sell it for the | distribution costs ($0.02/user/month, say) once I have recouped | someone's definition of a fair hourly wage for building it? | [deleted] | somebodythere wrote: | Compensated by whom? | dartharva wrote: | Creative works can't be valued just by the number of hours it | takes to make them. Good books must be paid for more than bad | books. | xtracto wrote: | The way I think this would work is like this: | | - A "good writer" sholud release the first chapter of their | book (or first N pages or whatever) for free. As a sort of | "Resume"/"Portfolio" | | - Then, he lists the rest of the TOC for the next chapters of | the book, and _the price_ of each of them. | | - He raises that money in a place like Kickstarter or similar | platform, for each of the chapters. And as he gets the money, | he publishes/uploads the new chapters of the book. | | - Once he gets the 100% of the price of the book, he has | delievered/published all the chapters. He may offer the whole | book in one file, printed copy, audio or whatever other | medium for an additional prodcution and distribution fee. | | With this approach writers who write good books would be able | to demand more money per chapter (hence, $ per hour of their | work) than writers who write bad books. While at the same | time, they would be able to ask for some fixed amount of $ | per hour of their work. Sure, a writer like Stephen King may | ask for $1000 USD per hour of his work, so one chapter of one | of his book will take $40,000 USD. But I am sure given his | fame, he won't have any trouble in raising that. | | This appraoch would also work for music and software. It is | kind of based on the Shareware model used in the 90s. | wafriedemann wrote: | Well, they would be fine if they had studied at Stanford. Crooks | don't study at Stanford. | generationP wrote: | Cheap bet: We won't hear many authors rejoice over this. As an | example, Stephen King's pinned tweet is concerned with a very | different kind of theft ( https://nitter.it/StephenKing ). | | In academia, this is slightly narrowing our choices (not much | because Z-Lib has never been the main source). As for the books | we can't read... well, we won't then. At this point, it's the | books competing over our attention, not us scrambling to find | them. Another cheap bet: The balances of academic publishers at | least will not improve from this. | ketzu wrote: | Am I misunderstanding something, or is this tweet circling the | completely wrong part? Revenue vs payment is completely | meaningless, because it is low due to advance payments. | | The 'important' part is revenue after profits vs royalties, or | profit sharing, which seems to be around 8.3%. | jl6 wrote: | There is widespread support for the complaint that copyright | duration is excessive, and that a degree of piracy should be | tolerated as a form of protest, but IMHO these guys crossed a | line when they tried to make money from piracy. | ketzu wrote: | I wonder, is there a nice site for searching and usage of open | source and other free books? There are software repositories, | places you go for free video (especially youtube) and more. I see | many complaints about missing openness of knowledge. So I think | something like that would be nice. | predictsoft wrote: | The bizarre thing is that they asked for donations as Amazon gift | cards! Surely Amazon could have blocked them? | dewey wrote: | And how would Amazon know which gift cards were donated to | them? You can buy them with cash everywhere, re-sell the | product you bought in cash and use that to fund the site. | pavelevst wrote: | Very sad day for world's education. They trying so hard to keep | knowledge only for rich | lofaszvanitt wrote: | You can set your own rules regarding books. | | If you profit from a book, you must buy it, no questions | answered. | | If you pass the 50th page, go buy it. | | Same applies to software... if you are generating income with it, | you must buy it. | | Rest is up to your conscience. | hd4 wrote: | Ah yes, actual hardened dangerous criminals finally facing | justice. | drummer wrote: | I couldnt sleep for months with those two running around free | knowing they could strike at any time | phpisatrash wrote: | Me and my colleagues will be affected by the end of Z library and | co related projects. | | Here in Brazil and for sure in most second and third world | countries, people don't have money to spend in books. | | You can argue that people can go to the library, but in most | cases it's even expensive to take a bus or taxi even a Uber. | | I'm a law student at an university in brazil. Law books are | really expensive. Even though my university have a library, | sometimes it doesn't have the books that the professors ask us to | read. | | Since I found z library I could have access to most of books that | I needed. | | I do know that the writers and publishers have costs and they | need to make money, but I don't agree with the fact that we have | to pay to have knowledge. It's more like if we don't have money, | we can't have knowledge. | diego_moita wrote: | What could be more Brazilian than law students breaking the law | in order to be able to understand the law? | | Sounds like those specimens collectors from the 19th century | that helped on the extinction of species (e.g. dodo bird, great | auk) by collecting and embalming them for "preservation". | joak wrote: | In most countries downloading a book is not illegal. What | might be illegal is to distribute copyrighted material. I say | "might" because often distributing is not even illegal. | Sending to friends and family without making money is usually | not illegal. And how do you determine "friends"? | kennend3 wrote: | > And how do you determine "friends"? | | This!! | | This exact lawsuit took place in Canada where the supreme | court ruruled that you don't necessarily need to know | someone to "lend" to them. | | They cited public libraries as an example of where books | and video s are lent out free of charge and the librarian | and the borrower are not "friends". | | https://www.iposgoode.ca/2012/07/the-pentalogy-the- | supreme-c... | HideousKojima wrote: | Yes, there used to be massive herds of law textbooks roaming | under the canopies of the Amazon, but thanks to Z-library's | irresponsible book-hunting and conservation methods they have | become a very rare sight. The only remaining herds are in the | Oxford University Press/Scholastic//Wiley/Houghton Mifflin | textbook preserve located just outside of Brasilia. | uniqueuid wrote: | It sucks, but search for used versions of those books. As long | as you're willing to wait a week or two, you can often get used | books internationally for <10 dollars. | | Also ask your professors if they can share relevant parts of | the books they use. Many countries outside the English-speaking | world have partial copyright exemptions for education. | | A last resort may be to ask professors whether they can apply | for evaluation copies. Publishers often give free copies to | educators so they can evaluate books for their curriculum. | Sadly, it's mostly digital versions today. | lettergram wrote: | > I do know that the writers and publishers have costs and they | need to make money, but I don't agree with the fact that we | have to pay to have knowledge. It's more like if we don't have | money, we can't have knowledge. | | For all human history, access to knowledge requires wealth. | Simple example -- If I want to know how to fix a particular old | refrigerator I bought second hand, I need to buy the manual. | | That said, I enjoy the story of Jesus feeding hundreds of | people with a few fish and a couple loaves of bread. I point | out the story is also a parable. Jesus is somehow duplicating | the fish and bread to feed the crowd. Isn't this similar to | knowledge? Should we not spread knowledge in a similar way if | it's of no cost to us? If you say "no, the author needs to be | paid!" Then I ask, "is not the fisherman and baker missing out | on profit from the sale of fish and bread?" | | It always brings an interesting discussion around this topic. | Fundamentally, I agree knowledge should be free. I post my | blogs for free for this very reason. If I need to make money, I | do work, sell products; etc. | FormerBandmate wrote: | Theoretically if Jesus duplicated fish and bread on an | industrial scale, yeah, it would. Also, labor still needs to | be put in to make the products, all piracy does is make it | incredibly easy to make additional copies. | | There's a reason musicians have to constantly tour and the | middle class of music has entirely degraded since the 90s | achenet wrote: | if the people Jesus fed with the duplicated fish and bread | were too poor to afford buying any food, is that still lost | sales? | | If some student in Rwanda downloads a copy of some obscure | Springer-Verlag text (I'm picking on SV because their | practices with research publications are just so cynically | rent-seeking it's easy to criticize them) that costs five | times his annual income and probably isn't even available | for sale in the country, is that really a lost sale? | | You brought up music - I'm an amateur/trying to get to | semi-pro musician myself, and my current "business model" | is basically the Patreon approach - make something people | love, let them give you money for it. I'm also an ardent | fan of several bands (Surfer Blood being one very notable | example) whose work I originally discovered via piracy. | Since that first listen at age 16, I've bought digital | copies of their work on Bandcamp and have bought tickets to | see them live. If I like the work I will do my best to | support the creator. I don't see why some massive record | company needs to take a 50% cut so they can pay their | "Managing Director of Artistic Innovation" his seven figure | salary. | | The argument "a pirated copy is a lost sale" is false in | the general case, as my aforementioned examples | demonstrate. | hggh wrote: | The Z Library is still alive, as a TOR Hidden Service: | http://zlibrary24tuxziyiyfr7zd46ytefdqbqd2axkmxm4o5374ptpc52... | akudha wrote: | I was looking for a book a while ago, it was something like | $150 in the U.S. Out of curiosity, I looked up the price in | other countries. It was 150 times the exchange rate. | | 150$ for a book is a lot of money even in the U.S. How do | publishers expect other countries to pay the equivalent of 150$ | (in local currency)? In many places $150 might be half the | monthly salary or worse. | | I understand publishers and authors need to get paid, | especially the authors. It takes decades to gain expertise in | difficult subjects and on top of it, one needs to be able to | write well to create a good book. So yes, authors need to be | compensated. But at the same time, their customer base in most | cases are college kids. How do they expect them to pay? And how | much of all that money goes to the authors anyway, who are the | real experts vs the middlemen, the publishers? | | The whole situation is just depressing. | syrrim wrote: | There is frequently a system where they sell an international | version of the book for significantly lower cost. In order to | prevent americans from simply purchasing the international | version, it will often have substantial differences. So | simply looking up the price of the same book may not show you | what would typically be paid in another country. | bombcar wrote: | The publishers originally had a great system, back before | the internet was alive and kicking - they'd sell the | textbook in the USA for $bigbux, and sell the exact same | one in India for $cheapasfree - basic standard price | segmentation, charge what the market can bear in each | market. | | But then the internet and cheap shipping appeared, and | suddenly people in the USA realized they could get the same | textbook by ordering it from someone in India, and pay | $cheapasfree + $shipping. | | And ever since the publishers have been trying to get back | to the original promised land. | tartoran wrote: | They could have lowered the price in the us enough to not | make it worth getting a cheapo version which the quality | is frequently worse. What many did instead was to lower | the quality and sell at high prices, in many cases books | have poor binding, poor print and editing and so on. | bombcar wrote: | That would involve them making _less_ money, which is a | big, big no-no. The whole thing is incestously corrupt as | all hell. | dotnet00 wrote: | The situation gets worse when considering the near | racketeering many publishers engage in. I had a couple of | professors who assigned us their own $100 textbooks, which of | course had a new edition every year and while they wouldn't | rely on it much in class, they'd make sure to include at | least one question in the exams about something only | mentioned in the textbook (without stating that that would | happen). | | This kind of textbook "abuse" was pretty crazy in undergrad. | In comparison, my graduate level professors all either used | very old textbooks and didn't really care about the edition | or outright used free textbooks. | andai wrote: | Some of our professors would give us a "translation key" | between new and old editions of textbooks, so we could work | with used ones. For example, which exercises are assigned | (in new editions they rearrange the exercises, for no | apparent reason but to make the old editions obsolete...). | gruez wrote: | >But at the same time, their customer base in most cases are | college kids. How do they expect them to pay? | | Student loans. When you flood an entire sector with money, | it's only logical that prices go up. | ornornor wrote: | Check out #bookz on Undernet. | | Also bookfinder.com which works all over the world to find the | cheapest used copy (including shipping) to your country. | attilaberczik wrote: | Use Library Genesis. It's also free and there is no download | limit, and you have access to approximately the same books. | https://libgen.is/ | generationP wrote: | Yes, but it is hard to tell whether LG will stay up for long | either. Their non-commercial nature makes it harder to hit | them with heavy damages, arguably, but the underlying threat | is the same, and there is no reason to think they are somehow | protected from the same dynamic. | | Download anything you need and then some. And spread your own | writings widely and freely. | reactspa wrote: | I need a clarification please: was Z-Library a commercial | service? | sombragris wrote: | To some extent, yes. The site limited downloads unless | you were a paid user. | | For more context see this recent HN-linked blog post: | | http://annas-blog.org/blog-3x-new-books.html | andai wrote: | Two questions: (1) there are torrent backups of LibGen, | right? | | (2) If (1) is true, then I can download a book with a | magnet link, and they'd have to arrest hundreds or | thousands of people all over the world to prevent it. | | The UI for for finding and downloading a single file from a | massive torrent is not very good in any torrent client I've | used, but how hard of a problem is that really? Is there | not tremendous value in solving it? | generationP wrote: | It's a big problem for extending the library. And | torrenting is inherently less safe than downloading | through a browser. | bembo wrote: | Why would torrenting be less safe? | cute_boi wrote: | because you may expose your ip to unintended peers. Not | all people use VPNs. | | If you are downloading from browser, you generally use | server ip, so you don't expose your ip to peers. You only | expose your ip to server. | gibspaulding wrote: | LibGen is an invaluable resource, but is there reason to | expect that Library Genesis will remain accessible for long | if similar sites are under attack? | agumonkey wrote: | people were proactively mirroring it, someone also tried | this for zlib here http://pilimi.org/zlib.html | ghd_ wrote: | It's a decentralized system https://freeread.org/ipfs/ | rg111 wrote: | > _You can argue that people can go to the library,_ | | Where I grew up, my town library did not have _any_ tech or | programming books. Forget new jornal issues or cutting edge | science books. | | "Just go to the library" is such a first-world-and-megacity | thing to say. | Mezzie wrote: | Even in the first world in a giant city it can be crap | advice. | | I wrote a paper in library school about how the Vancouver | Public Library failed to offer anything of substance to | intermediate language learners (with a focus on Mandarin | materials because of the high Mandarin speaking population) - | if you're a person learning Mandarin to communicate with | immigrant populations there, you skip from basic travel | phrasebooks to videos/movies in Mandarin for Chinese | audiences. | | Public libraries aren't great at serving the long tail or | more advanced interests for various reasons. And academic | institutions usually have rules preventing use of their | materials by people not affiliated with the school. | kennend3 wrote: | As a fellow Canadian i can tell you another story about our | broken library system. | | It NEEDS to be consolidated. | | I live in ($smalltown$) just outside Toronto. The border | between my smalltown ands the other small towns that | surround me are unclear at best. | | Oddly enough, each smalltown has its own library system, | its own staff and each for the most part has a terrible | book collection. | | I rarely go to the library for the town i actually live in | because it is a forgotten wasteland. The library from the | other town is just a few blocks away and they have done an | excellent job keeping their library current and active. | | In my town it would basically be you, the librarians and a | few insects in the building, next town over is full on a | regular basis. They also have programs and stay current, my | town is dead and boring. | | Why are we paying for libraries like this? All that | duplicate staff and their associated pensions and benefits | could and should have went to books, services for the | public, etc. | | I asked my town mayor once why the library building is so | nice (granite flooring, floor to ceiling windows, it really | is an attractive building inside and out) but yet the book | collection is terrible. | | The mayor at the time told me the library is a showpiece to | attract new residents??? I guess they assume new residents | don't actually step inside and discover the book collection | is terrible? | | Public libraries are a valuable asset, but need to be | managed properly as well. | Mezzie wrote: | I'm actually not Canadian, I just did my MLIS there. ;) | | It is odd that your small towns don't have some kind of | consortium agreement. There are benefits and drawbacks to | having separate versus consolidated systems. Consolidated | systems would, as you note, be more efficient in terms of | staff costs and probably allow for materials to travel | more easily. On the other hand, a consolidated system can | end up only really serving the richest or largest | community, rendering the rest of the population as | afterthoughts. | | Like from an ROI perspective, it makes _sense_ public | libraries are terrible at serving the long tail /the part | of the population who want to educate themselves to a | high level. Patrons are more interested in popular | fiction and children's books, so that's the most bang for | the buck. | | But ugh on the building rationale. Without knowing what | the building was like before, I can't comment too much | (e.g. if there was mold/water damage/etc.) but that does | seem like an odd use of funds. | skjoldr wrote: | A reminder that Z-library is still available through Tor: | http://zlibrary24tuxziyiyfr7zd46ytefdqbqd2axkmxm4o5374ptpc52... I | doubt it took just two people to handle the entire project. | Synaesthesia wrote: | There's also library genesis https://libgen.rs | Andrew_nenakhov wrote: | I believe that copyright should be reformed, and all books must | be available for free in the digital form. If there would be | fewer books, well, there are more than enough fiction books than | one can read in the hundred lifetimes. Technical/science books, | and crucial technical information contained in them can be made | available as paid web services, or authors could be funded prior | to writing it - via crowdfunding, grants, or by irresistible | graphomania. | [deleted] | [deleted] | mirzap wrote: | How much prison time they face? I'm not sad about them. They did | it for the money, not because they believed knowledge should be | free. They basically stole other people work and put their | paywall to access stolen books. Total opposite of Libgen or Sci- | Hub. | technoooooost wrote: | you must be fun at parties | pkoird wrote: | Their free model was much more than enough for a regular user | to use. I mean 10 books download per day? I'm not sure if I | personally would have had to ever exceed that limit. | mirzap wrote: | Which is bad. They made a mirror of Libgen, closed it and | charged money for access to it. You were unable to create a | mirror from their mirror. Why put a limit at all? Why charge | for access, just as same as publishers do? Defeats entire | purpose of Libgen and SciHub. | pkoird wrote: | I understand what you're saying but if you look at the | effects alone (and not the means), it seems well justified. | Their increased revenue allowed them to provide more and | more (than LibGen at least) books to the users free of | charge. I do not know the difficulties involved in | mirroring Z-Library, but there seems to be someone who did | it recently and posted to HN before the site went down. | arglebargle123 wrote: | It was 10 downloads per day from the website and then a | further 10 from the telegram bot too. | deathgripsss wrote: | I didn't even realise there was a limit. I used to get a | couple of books a month. Never close to 10 a day. | gustavorg wrote: | I don't want to say in the meantime, but, in the meantime, the | pedophile ring that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell served | have not even been cited, ever. | gyog wrote: | True but that includes powerful men in the political sphere | such as Biden and Trump. No way the Justice Department is going | to touch this, when it implicates their bosses and potential | bosses. | consumer451 wrote: | How is Biden tied to Epstein? I must have missed that one. | voakbasda wrote: | And that right there is why I support the "no justice, no | peace" movement. Long live the revolution. | markles wrote: | And how many people went to prison over the crash of 2008? | null_object wrote: | I know this won't be a popular take on HN, but while I can | understand and to a certain extent sympathize with pirating | movies (the intentional friction and arbitrary geographic | limitations on access imposed by the multinational movie-industry | conglomerates), I can't see stealing some poor author's work in | the same light. | | Sure, people get hung-up about DRM (which can easily be removed | by widely-accessible tools), but e-books can be purchased pretty | much anywhere in the world. I'm in Sweden but buy most of my | e-books from the US. But often buy books directly from publishers | (hopefully they, and the author, get a better cut that way). | | The fact these people were trying to personally profit (some | other HN:ers have documented this), while trying to present | themselves as some sort of "information wants to be free" info- | warriors doesn't make the whole thing any better. | | An enormous amount of work goes into producing a book - through a | close friend who works in book-publishing I know a couple of | authors who pretty much starve for a year or two to produce their | work - and then the editing, typesetting, designing, proof- | reading etc is all an enormous and personal investment. | | In spite of what people think, authors are not all budding | J.K.Rowlings with movie-deals and a couple of billion in the | bank, and if we don't buy their books, they won't be able to | produce the next one for people to pirate. | reisse wrote: | > but e-books can be purchased pretty much anywhere in the | world. I'm in Sweden | | Sorry, but by "pretty much anywhere in the world" you clearly | mean "first world". If you live outside of US/Canada and EU it | is much harder to obtain books legally. Publishing agreements | usually cover specific countries, and no-one cares about, for | example, selling books in English in Central Asia. So even if | you have means to pay for the book (which can be challenging - | and I'm not talking about "having money" here, I'm talking | about "technical possiblity" - Visa and Mastercard are not as | universal as they might seem from the first world), most of the | time no-one can or wish to sell it to you legally. | | Interesting that Steam solved most of that problems for game | distribution though. They have worldwide publishing agreements, | regional prices AND good support of local payment providers in | many countries. I think a lot of people underestimate how these | factors allowed Steam to overtake piracy. | anhner wrote: | > If you live outside of US/Canada and EU it is much harder | to obtain books legally | | I completely agree and even though I imagine countries | outside of these have it much worse, even within the EU you | can find massive differences between countries. For example, | there is a much smaller selection in Eastern European | countries vs. Western, and books are the same price or | sometimes even pricier while wages are significantly lower. | deafpolygon wrote: | > allowed Steam to overtake piracy | | Let's not forget the pricing, as well. Older games are | actually priced lower than most books and movies, which are | still being artificially inflated by their respective | distributors. | AuryGlenz wrote: | To be fair, I'm guessing books have a longer tail than | games. The vast majority of game sales for AAA games are at | release. | SergeAx wrote: | Let's also not forget Steam pricing policies for different | regions. Until recently same games in Turkey were priced 5 | times lower than in Switzerland. | lezojeda wrote: | >Interesting that Steam solved most of that problems for game | distribution though. They have worldwide publishing | agreements, regional prices AND good support of local payment | providers in many countries. I think a lot of people | underestimate how these factors allowed Steam to overtake | piracy. | | Sadly it is being ruined by people from first-world using | VPNs. Many AAA stopped using regional prices and we're stuck | paying the same cost as in the first world. | Calamityjanitor wrote: | From the other side it feels just as unfair. When I lived | of ~AU$200 a month, $100 towards rent, a new game was ~$100 | in Aus. It was often much cheaper to buy physical copies | from Asia and import. | achenet wrote: | Not sure the authors are getting much money, compared to the | publishers. Perhaps it depends on the nice - I heard sci-fi is | rather low margin, whereas academic publishing tends to be | rent-seeking. | | Still, with the world wide web, it's possible to cut out the | middleman, get the book and directly support the author is he | puts a Stripe button on his site. Not sure why we need the | publishing company middleman anymore. | jpgvm wrote: | Your geographical white privilege is showing. | | Getting access to books for instance in SEA or Africa is an | entirely different story to one of the richest countries in the | world with some of the highest standards of living (in your | case Sweden but could apply to most EU/NA/AU/NZ). | | I would say the vast majority pirating couldn't afford the work | in the first place, meaning nothing is lost from the | perspective of the author. It's not a sale stolen, it's someone | that would otherwise simply go without. | DoingIsLearning wrote: | > Your geographical white privilege is showing. | | Although I fully agree with the points you make I just want | to point out that being wealthy (from a world average wealth | standpoint) is dissociated from being white. | | The issue is limited access to resources due to lack of | wealth, or geo-location with bizantine distribution | contracts. Race has little to do with this discussion. Plenty | of white poor people across the globe, plenty of non-white | rich people across the globe. | jpgvm wrote: | smeagull wrote: | It's human culture. The idea that it should be the sole | provenance of rich multi-nationals to decide who can afford to | read is disgusting. It should all be freely accessible. | | Removing money from the equation would also solve other quality | issues. | jasmer wrote: | It's 'disgusting' to suggest others should have to labour for | you for free - and suggesting 'removing money from the issue | would solve' issues is more than naive, it's glib. | | IP is not 'corporate protectionism'. | | The entire system absolutely depends on it, moreover, the | vast majority of IP holders are very small entities. | | Particularly in this case, authors. | | The internet is actually a greatly liberating opportunity for | authors, especially those on the 'long tail' to develop an | audience that they would never have an opportunity to | otherwise. | | And of course - anyone who wants to create for free, as many | do, can do that. | | But if there's no concept of IP, then it implies 'creative | work goes unpaid' and paradoxically, flushes surpluses into | those that have much more material power in the value chain - | a bit like 'open source' devs who work tirelessly on projects | whereupon the surpluses are mostly captured by large | corporate institutions. | | Of course there's always grey areas, and on some level | 'release valves' for information is appropriate, but on the | whole, IP protections are reasonable. | | Vast amount of the works we are used to in our daily lives | both professional and private, upon which we depend, would | immediately vanish, lacking any kind of viable business | model. | | Finally - there's much ado in Africa on so many fronts, if | you want to help to solve IP distribution issues there | related to price discrimination, there's a lot of opportunity | there. | dartharva wrote: | Yes, indeed, government-mandated monopolies are really the | best way to make sure the "creative works" of fundamentally | indeterminable values get paid and the "free-market" is | upheld /s. | | This moronic notion that IP somehow encourages creativity | is so delusional it's not even funny. Did Michelangelo and | Shakespeare need copyrights to their works to make money? | Have thinkers and authors who contributed most to human | intellectual evolution across the Golden Ages and | Renaissances of science, arts and philosophies ever needed | state-enforced punishments against non-consensual copying? | Good works are not funded using abusive laws to crack down | on those trying to share them, they get sponsored by | communities that value them. | | There are countless examples of absolutely garbage works | that end up making a lot of money and there are countless | awesome works that are completely free to the public. IP | does nothing to reward good productions, all it does is | help publishers and governments abuse individual rights and | control information. NOBODY HAS THE RIGHT TO HAVE A | MONOPOLY ON IDEAS AND INFORMATION. You are free to keep | your ideas and information private, but if you make them | public they are NOT your private property anymore. IP laws | are probably among the worst inventions the west has ever | introduced to the world that has single-handedly held back | unfathomable amounts of progress. | sabellito wrote: | How would the authors pay rent? | TremendousJudge wrote: | A huge majority of book authors (especially for technical | writing) are not professional authors, and barely get any | money from book sales. Ask any university professor that | has had a book published. | ccbccccbbcccbb wrote: | So let's totally remove the heat-transfer agent from the | thermodynamic machine of society and instead rely on an army | of maxwell demons to decide how much food and floor space | each human element in the system should be given for its | work, right? | | That was called 'communism', had been attempted to implement, | resulted in millions of deaths and miserably failed | regardless due to the physics of the process. | | The heat transfer agent is not the problem per se, it's the | ability of some entities to create it out of thin air and | pump into the system, as well as shady mechanisms of its | distribution. | ccbccccbbcccbb wrote: | Monkey see "communism", monkey downvote | Tomte wrote: | > but e-books can be purchased pretty much anywhere in the | world. | | English and local books at least. Can I easily buy Swedish- | language books in Germany? I really don't know. | phpisthebest wrote: | >>An enormous amount of work goes into producing a book | | So your saying books should be protected because they take alot | of work, but movies should not because they dont? | | I am highly confused by your ethical position here. Either | creative works should be protected by copyright or they should | not. | | It seems your personal connection to authors have clouded your | judgement in favor of that medium over other creatives mediums, | I wonder if you would feel the same if you had personal | relationships with independent film maker, to toss your analogy | back, not ever filmmaker has a J.K Rowling book to make a film | about which comes with a built in audience | | Now me personally I think copyright is WAY over protective, I | think the US original copyright law was a good balance, 14 | years, with 1 extension if the physical person that created the | work requests it (i.e corporations get 14 years only, | individuals can get up to 28 years of protection) | connorgutman wrote: | It's very simple actually. You (and most of HN) live in a tech | industry bubble. Living wages in the U.S are terrible and | disposable income is non-existent. I work a 9-5 just like | everyone else but when it comes down to it I don't have the | money to buy new books. I can either buy used paperback from a | second-hand store, go to the library, or pirate an epub. None | of these options pay the original author and are effectively | the same. Given that I was never going to pay anyways, why do | you find the third option unethical? It hurts absolutely no one | but greatly enhances my quality of life and (in some cases) | helps society by making me a more educated individual. The only | thing piracy costs authors is opportunity (which in my case was | always 0). | connorgutman wrote: | Barrin92 wrote: | If you're pirating Stephen King or a 300$ textbook from a guy | who has tenure at Harvard I doubt anyone probably including | the author cares but a fair amount of authors aren't making | any more than you make. | | Friend of mine published her own graphic novel basically | living in her parents attic and a day after it was out | someone had ripped it and thrown it on a comic piracy site. | That's not ethical. | | If you live on a 12-15/hour salary which I have too you still | can afford the occassional book here and there, you can't | tell me you spend zero on recreational stuff. I don't care if | anyone fleeces Marvel studios but if people start pirating | independent works from people no better off, often worse, | that's iffy. | connorgutman wrote: | I appreciate your sentiment, and trust me I really do want | to support people like your friend, but no I literally do | not have any money for recreational activities (and if I | did I would buy a videogame or boardgame because it would | last longer). I make $13.50 / h (which is above minimum | wage here in Arizona) and go to school full-time. Rent is | $1,000 (absolute cheapest I have found in my college town), | groceries are roughly $500, gas is $50-$100 depending on | world affairs, utilities are $250,public transportation (so | that I don't have to pay for parking at shool) is $50, and | the list goes on tbh. I'm lucky enough to have a Prius that | was given to me by my family so no car payment even. I'm | one of the lucky ones for being in college at all. This is | the America that most people live in. Well even that isn't | true, I have it way better than most. | PuppyTailWags wrote: | Checking out from a library and grabbing a pirated | version are different in that checking out from a library | _generates demand_. The library may respond by buying | additional copies of a given work, and you can put in | requests to your local library to buy work if they don 't | currently stock it. Even if a library refuses to buy the | work, it's common for libraries to loan works to each | other-- so a library from another city or further out may | buy the book and let you borrow it for example. It all | generates demand for libraries to buy more. | dartharva wrote: | Large-scale pirates that can actually reach a significant | amount of people almost never rip-off indie creators, and | even if they do, they are the least likely to impact sales | - people are unlikely bother acquiring illegitimate copies | of obscure indie works as against big-brand stuff whose | names they have actually heard of. | | I really doubt the sales of the graphic novel that friend | of yours were impacted in any non-negligible way by it | being ended up on a piracy site. If anything, it might as | well have worked as an advertisement. | dmitriid wrote: | Time and again it has been shown that pirating doesn't hurt | sales because it is rarely if ever done by people who | would've paid for the stuff anyway. | | Moreover, making stuff easily accessible (e.g. Steam, | Nerflix) reduces piracy by orders of magnitude. | trabant00 wrote: | I'm going to pretend you are serious and genuine so: | | - living wages in the US are something most of the rest of | world only dreams about. And most can afford to buy a book | once in a while, even new (of course it depends on the book). | Source: eastern Europe. | | - second hand and library books have generated revenue for | the author already. Going full piracy and decreasing demand | for the those two hurts the author, hurts the second book | stores and hurts the libraries. | | I pirate books as well but at least I'm honest about the | consequences of my actions. | connorgutman wrote: | I am absolutely genuine, and I think you do not understand | the average American. The rest of the world may dream about | our wages but it's still putting lipstick on a pig. Most | the people I know can't even feed their families right now, | let alone buy a book for pleasure. I'm not sure where you | are getting your information from but the lives of college- | educated middle-class Americans and above are not | representative of the majority. I will clarify, I obviously | DO NOT think that my situation compares to someone in | another country, specifically under-developed ones. In the | context of books and recreational activities, however, I | think you are vastly overestimating the US. | aquariusDue wrote: | I agree with you, even if it is unethical to pirate books | I'd make the case that pirating books you can't afford to | buy is what helped a non-trivial amount of people escape | the generational cycle of poverty. In this particular | case, stealing knowledge for a chance at a better career, | the end might justify the means. | | Programmers from poor countries and poor backgrounds are | were they are today making a good living from this career | probably because of torrents with collections of | programming books back from 10 years ago or more when | free video learning on YouTube wasn't as developed as it | is today. | | I made some sweeping generalizations but I hope I got my | point across at least. This criminal avenue of pirating | books and stealing potential revenue from authors is what | allows some people to enjoy a better living. | wang_li wrote: | Median household income in the US in 2022 is $78,000. The | average American has adequate income and can't justify | pirating movies, books, music, porn, etc. on the basis of | poverty. | connorgutman wrote: | That is a wildly skewed outlook. The per-capita income in | America is $35,000 (https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fac | t/table/US/SEX255221). Household income, as defined by | the U.S. Census Bureau, includes the gross cash income of | all people ages 15 years or older occupying the same | housing unit, regardless of how they are related, if at | all. Meaning my household income is somewhere above $100K | because I have 3 roommates. Typically, the lower your | income the more roommates you have. Median household | income is a useless figure for determining how well the | average American is doing. | throwaway2037 wrote: | BetterWorldBooks.com is excellent. I have bought from them | for years. I recommend you try it. | | Also, you wrote: <<None of these options pay the original | author>> Libraries buy millions of books per year in the US | -- expensive hardbacks. They must be the single largest | buying group. That money pays authors. Also, I never once saw | an author upset that a library was lending their book. The | same is true for second hand book selling. | dublinben wrote: | Here's an example I found in less than a minute of an | author railing against used book sales: | https://authorkristenlamb.com/2015/12/pay-the-writer- | pirates... | thescriptkiddie wrote: | They're burning a thousand libraries and you're complaining | about hypothetical lost profits? | Mandatum wrote: | This is the most American take I've seen on the debate yet. | tuyiown wrote: | I'm french. I occasionally buy ebooks, but the price of eBooks | is maintained artificially higher to protect traditional | (paper) channels. The things is, that extra money does _not_ go | to the authors, which I would finance way more wholeheartedly. | Basically you get taxed because of your medium preferences, and | the money is pocketed by the worse actor of the whole business. | criddell wrote: | > which can easily be removed by widely-accessible tools | | Even if that were true today, it's a cat-and-mouse game and it | may not always be true. | | I don't know if FairPlay DRM that Apple uses or Adobe's DRM has | been thoroughly cracked, but last time I checked, Amazon's KFX | hasn't truly been cracked yet. The best I've seen are | workarounds to get Amazon to deliver the book in an older | format that has been cracked, but then you lose the typography | improvements that are tied to the new format. | nudpiedo wrote: | Although I agree with you, tell me now how can I find "The book | of Gossage" which is a singular classic book nowadays out of | catalogue. | JKCalhoun wrote: | Agree, forget copyright, there needs to be an "abandonware" | clause similar to the (unauthorized, I know) way software is | treated. | | Plenty of books I have only been able to find on eBay and at | sometimes insane prices. | sitkack wrote: | Not only that, I looked into republishing some books from | the 80s, it is impossible to know who currently could | possibly have legitimate rights to do so! | | For any work out of print, one should be able to republish | it and pay a nominal fee directly to the library of | congress. | prisoner655321 wrote: | > if we don't buy their books, they won't be able to produce | the next one for people to pirate. | | This is a false dichotomy. Book piracy and traditional book | publishing co-exist. If book publishing wants to better compete | with piracy, they can innovate like other industries have. As | well, your implied prediction --- that if we don't "stop all | the downloading" [0] then books will disappear --- is decidedly | ahistorical. Books have existed since long before publishing | houses existed, and indeed it's easier than ever to publish a | book and get money for it. | | [0] https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1eA3XCvrK90 | sec400 wrote: | Imagine the person who cannot afford a book or paper on a | particular topic. Should they not have access to the | information? | | I agree, as always there is nuance, but zlib et al fulfill a | need for certain people. In b4 public libraries, they aren't | equal around the world, depend on geographic proximity and add | latency to the learning process. | null_object wrote: | > Imagine the person who cannot afford a book or paper on a | particular topic. Should they not have access to the | information? | | Imagine I want whatever you do for a living? Should you work | for me for free? | theCrowing wrote: | I would be on board with you if only we got access to the | public founded papers. | jliptzin wrote: | That analogy doesn't work when the marginal cost to do that | work is literally zero, in fact he wouldn't even know he's | performing the "work" | jsmith99 wrote: | The key question is, what proportion of zlibrary users | would have purchased the books legitimately if piracy | didn't exist, or would have been able to afford it? | Anecdotally I suspect most pirates have little income for | books but I can't find data on this. | rsj_hn wrote: | The error in this argument is assuming that the price of | a good must equal its marginal cost. Software, for | example, also has a marginal cost of zero -- it can be | reproduced with the same technology as electronic text, | and yet developing software is expensive, so the price of | each copy is set above the marginal cost so that the | developer gets paid. By denying the developer the right | to set a price for their work, you are in effect forcing | them to work for someone else for free. It does not | matter what the marginal cost is. | | Now there's a lot of open source software, and a lot of | open access publications and free books out there, as | well as systems in place -- we call them "libraries" -- | by which taxpayers purchase works on behalf of the public | and make them available in limited quantities for no | charge. And here I need to reiterate the bane of badly | construed interventions is trying to control prices | rather than adjusting incomes. Stop messing with prices. | The way we help the poor is with income support, not by | creating a parallel price system for the poor. | jliptzin wrote: | I don't think anyone should work for free, I don't know | what the right answer is. It's a shame when someone | doesn't get paid for their work due to piracy, but also a | shame if someone can't access an important work to them | that is free to deliver but they just can't afford (like | a student/researcher, etc). Ideally digital works should | be free and donation supported, where people voluntarily | contribute what they feel the work is worth, limited by | what they can afford. But I won't delude myself into | thinking something like that would actually work. | FeepingCreature wrote: | You're not - they can just not do the work. You can argue | that a business model is being destroyed; you can't argue | that anyone is "forced to work for free" by piracy, | because they're not forced to work in the first place. | splistud wrote: | benibela wrote: | I do research at an university and develop open-source | software. | | Everything I work on is free to download | zerotolerance wrote: | I'm an author. Steal my book. The whole point of writing is to | hopefully help anyone learn something that you've shared. | Authors aren't writing for the money those who do are selling | at such volumes that they'll never even notice the dip. In most | cases they'd be trying to get blood from stone. | | Steal it every time. | peoplefromibiza wrote: | try buying Italian books in USA. | | Hell, it's hard to find them even in France! | gizmo wrote: | Artificial scarcity is still bad. Imagine a world where books | are free for everybody, not just for people who live in | prosperous areas with good libraries. Would you then advocate | making books nonfree thereby placing books out of reach for | 2/3rd of the world population, which is more or less where we | are today? | trabant00 wrote: | > Imagine a world where books are free for everybody | | I imagine it will go the same way of the other internet | content that is free: adds, spam, clickbait, low quality, | etc. | FeepingCreature wrote: | For fiction, I almost exclusively read online serialized | fanfiction/webfiction. This is already the world I live in. | And I can confirm: it's pretty great. | theCrowing wrote: | The price spike on comics and graphic novels after the | comiXology acquisition by Amazon is over 150%... | Tijdreiziger wrote: | And the app apparently became worse. I wanted to buy some | manga on comiXology, but when I downloaded the free trial | chapter, it had a bunch of weird borders, which made it | unenjoyable to read. | | According to the reviews, the previous version of the app was | much better, but the current version is just a reskin of the | Kindle app. | JKCalhoun wrote: | Maybe I'm _thinking wrong_ but I expected digital editions of | books to be like $3 or something since there are no printing | /shipping costs of the equivalent printed book. | | In the old analog world, authors might expect 15% of gross | sales. You figure the publisher needed the 85% to cover | printing, shipping of the physical book. (Oh, and they should | make a profit there too.) | | But if you no longer have to deal with pulp, I would naively | expect an electronic book to sell for something like 30% of | the cost of the physical book -- splitting the sale between | author and publisher. Presumably both parties still make a | comparable profit. | | I know I've dropped advertising on the floor in the above | discussion and perhaps that counts for a significant cost to | the publisher. But at the same time, assuming DRM, a digital | book sale should benefit the publisher/author as it is | typically non-transferable (unlike the physical books that | end up in Little Libraries or Goodwill). | | I might add that if eBooks dropped to $0.99 a book, I would | be buying them faster than music tracks. Maybe Jobs got two | things right. ;-) | mmmlinux wrote: | Download video games have the same issue. same price as | physical release, cant resell it, never goes on sale, still | the same price it started at 4 years later when a physical | copy is 50% discounted. Already have a physical copy? no | you cant download it. | gamblor956 wrote: | Most of the cost of a book is not the physical pulp or ink | that went into making the book, it is in the editing, | typesetting, and marketing that went into making the book | ready for sale, so ebooks generally should not be much | cheaper than physical books. | auggierose wrote: | Many of the books I am interested in have actually been | financed by tax payers, because their authors are professors. | These days publishers are not adding much value here, actually | they often make high quality publishing harder by terrible off- | shore handling of LaTeX. | | I've bought quite a few ebooks from the AMS (American | Mathematical Society), just to get very angry about the | annoying small print on the bottom of EVERY FREAKING PAGE | stating that I am the owner of this book. I don't feel bad | about replacing these damaged goods with the real deal. | sombragris wrote: | > e-books can be purchased pretty much anywhere in the world | | That would be true if and only if there's an ebook version for | the book you want. | | There are lots of books (even essential works for some fields) | out there for which there are no legal ebooks. Your only hope | would be to get a digitized PDF from zlibrary or libgen. Even | if you had the cash to spare for purchasing it, you can't. | | One interesting case is what happened with books such as James | Livingston's "Modern Christian Thought" (Fortress Press). I | need it as an ebook. Well, they have (and I have purchased) | volume I as an ebook, but they have Volume II only as | paperback. | | I reached out to the publisher to inquire whether they are | going to release Volume II as an ebook. Someone there answered, | telling me that they "forgot" to release Volume II in | electronic format, and that they plan to release it "soon". I'm | still waiting... | christophilus wrote: | I bought a Kobo for its easy public library integration. Jokes | on me. My public library doesn't have most of the books I want, | and the way ebooks are leased to public libraries is a | disgrace-- something I only found out after buying the Kobo. | So, what's a guy to do? I buy the books wherever I can find | them at the cheapest price (usually on the used market, | sometimes via Kindle store, sometimes via Kobo store). Then, I | pirate it, since that's a much more convenient way to get a | DRM-free format that actually works on my device. | | In my case, at least, I paid for every z-library book I ever | downloaded--with one exception. Z-library also made it easy to | browse books the way you would in a physical book store. | Sometimes, you think, "Looks interesting." You open it up, read | a few pages and realize, "Not for me." Z-library was a good way | to do this. | | Both of those are legitimate use cases. Probably not the most | _common_ use case, but it sure was handy, and now I 've got to | find a replacement. | andai wrote: | Most of zlib's content was from libgen, zlib had a nicer ui | though. | nathell wrote: | I think we can have our cake and eat it too. | | https://blog.danieljanus.pl/2022/09/24/paying-for-books/ | mavhc wrote: | This is the simplest solution, get a drm ebook, and pay the | person who wrote it directly, they'll get way more money from | you that way than if you bought the book | lezojeda wrote: | 10 USD is the average cost for an e-book from my anecdotal | experience, some even 20. 200 USD our average salary range | approximately. | | It's not easy for us, you can say "well if you can't afford | them then tough luck" which I could understand but that'd be | your point for most of the third world. There's a reason Steam | videogames regional prices exist for example (which people with | VPNs ruined it exploting the system) | noodlesUK wrote: | A lot of the usage I see of these sites is in the academic | world. Academic publishing is a nightmare (especially on the | journal side). | | The books are often not available at all in the region you're | in or if they are, they might be priced differently. It's | especially difficult because you're going to skim a book to see | if it has any relevant material, then move on to the next one. | Usually university libraries are the only way of doing this, | but not everyone has access to one. No individual is going to | buy a dozen books nominally priced at >100 usd each just to | write a paper for their masters degree or similar | cge wrote: | >The books are often not available at all in the region | you're in or if they are, they might be priced differently. | | Also, "the region you're in" can even mean _the same country | as the publisher_ , or even anywhere in the world. Publishers | may be unwilling to sell the books to individuals at all, or | may sell them only as part of larger sets with very high | prices. They may only be willing to sell hardcover copies, | for a premium, even if they do produce softcover ones. It's | simply not feasible, in most cases, to purchase the books you | need to do scholarly research as an individual. And if you're | looking at digital publications, the situation becomes even | worse. | | I recently had someone tell me that their father, in the US, | had been looking, not wanting to ask them, for a copy of a | book they had just published a chapter in. The book could | only be purchased by individuals as a set of six books, all | in hardcover, for around $500. | | Part of the problem here is that individuals are often not | the target customers for academic publishing: libraries are. | Publishers can be worried that if they do sell in ways that | are convenient to individuals, that might reduce their | profits from libraries. If they sell books individually, | instead of as larger sets, then university libraries can | order only the volumes that people request, rather than | needing to purchase all of them. If they sell softcover | copies, libraries can buy them and rebind them in-house, or | simply have them as softcover, rather than needing to pay | that premium. If they have prices that are reasonable for | individuals choosing books to buy with their own money, the | prices will need to be far lower than what they can be for | libraries being instructed to buy books by others and needing | to figure out how. | | And, as you mention, the journal (and reference) side is | _even worse_. Outside of very high profile journals, which | are simply expensive for individual subscriptions, many | otherwise quite reasonable journals from reputable publishers | simply won 't offer subscriptions to individuals at all: | their only option for individuals may well be article-level | purchases at prices that would be utterly absurd for actual | research. In some cases, they also won't offer subscriptions | to institutions, except as a (potentially very large) package | of journals. At a small university, I can remember the | library pointing out that getting access to one yearly | proceedings publication very important for our field would | cost a five figure yearly amount per year, because it was | only sold as a package of hundreds of publications. Larger | universities can have problems with this in the six or seven | figures. | psychphysic wrote: | If I can access a book for free at a library. | | Why can't I read it online for free? | | Ultimately the answer will be about rights and really | suggesting the author can put arbitrary restrictions in content | that's been purchased. | | Those restrictions exist for financial reasons not moral. As | such this is not theft in any ethical sense but a quirk of the | laws. A law apparently many people disagree with... | aliqot wrote: | It's not free at the library, the book was purchased with | your taxes. | connorgutman wrote: | It was purchased a single time, just like the original | e-book that you pirate. | deafpolygon wrote: | What people fail to realize is that ebooks sometimes cost | libraries more money than physical books. The libraries | buy them with cost of degradation in mind, so after x | number of lends, they have to repurchase the book in | order to keep making it available to their patrons. This | is how they're able to make an agreement with the | publisher in order to legally provide you with a digital | lending library. | connorgutman wrote: | IMO (having worked at a public library) the vast majority | of inventory is donated second-hand books. | angelbar wrote: | * copy | aliqot wrote: | Every person in the world doesnt use a single library | with a single copy. Every local library purchases one or | more. How many did Zlib purchase? How many Zlibs are | there? | connorgutman wrote: | That's a logical race to the bottom that makes me think | you have never checked out a book from a US library. If | you were to calculate how much an author makes from their | book being in libraries it's miniscule. For starters most | library books are donated secondhand and not purchased | new by libraries. Secondly, most libraries only have a | single copy of a given book unless it is a major title | (It's not uncommon for waitlists to be booked up for | months where I live). Additionally, most titles are | shared across multiple libraries in a state or city. | Where I live you can return a book to any library because | they just circulate copies around the state. Regardless, | there are roughly 9,000 public libraries in the U.S. | let's pretend that every single library purchases 1 copy | of a given book new (an extremely generous estimate). | Most authors are not self-published and earn 10-12% | royalties, but let's pretend this author is self- | published and earns around 40% from their printer before | operational expenses. Let's also pretend it's an absolute | banger of a book and is selling for a whopping $20/copy. | That means they make $8/copy before taxes, bookstore | fees, shipping, and other expenses that the self- | publisher does not pay for. Let's be generous and say | they somehow make $8/copy after all of that. If every | library bought 1 copy (which, again. They do NOT) the | author would earn $72,000. That's absolute peanuts | compared to what they earn on Amazon from people who can | afford firsthand books. The point of libraries and piracy | is not to stop people who CAN afford books from buying | them. It's supposed to enable those who CANNOT. A more | productive approach would be to publicly fund authors but | according to Americans that's filthy communism. | wang_li wrote: | >A more productive approach would be to publicly fund | authors but according to Americans that's filthy | communism. | | That's how you get books written by authors who are good | at filling out government forms, not books written by | good authors. See the many terrible pieces of public art | that is required in many places as part of public | construction projects as an example of what I'm talking | about. | psychphysic wrote: | I think you need to specify what context you're talking | in. | | Do you see it as... 1. Criminal 2. Immoral 3. Having | downsides | | I think we agree it's not criminal (as scale doesn't | apply to a binary criminality judgement stealing a penny | is as criminal as stealing a pound though punishment will | vary). | | Are you suggesting it's immoral? Because I can't see | where you make such an argument. | | Or are you saying well it has downsides as authors may | earn less? It's likely book purchases are affected by | libraries. I don't think the effect is as profound as | people think. | | Without that context it's quite hard to discuss this | topic. | GrinningFool wrote: | Scale is a thing though, right? | | The library book might get borrowed dozens or hundreds of | times. The pirated ebook is copied anywhere from dozens | to millions of times. | connorgutman wrote: | It goes back to opportunity though. Most people who | pirate books don't have the income or ability to purchase | them new. The scale is irrelevant if the per-user profit | opportunity is 0. The only thing that changes is more | people read and further their education. | [deleted] | gglitch wrote: | Careful. They'll come for the libraries next. | wellareyousure wrote: | nivenkos wrote: | The American Empire strikes again. | | You'd think they would have seen this coming though. | | I think a long-term solution is a universal revenue-sharing | programme - so like some portion of taxes is allocated to a | universal repository, and then paid out to creators according to | usage. No middle-men and no distribution issues, etc. | prox wrote: | Maybe in the first 5 years it's just what it is now, and then | it goes into the repository. I am going to assume most sales | are in those years. | andsoitis wrote: | > universal revenue-sharing programme | | Run by whom? The UN? | djmips wrote: | What about a Spotify for books? | dartharva wrote: | > I think a long-term solution is a universal revenue-sharing | programme - so like some portion of taxes is allocated to a | universal repository, and then paid out to creators according | to usage. No middle-men and no distribution issues, etc. | | So, just another publishing and distribution monopoly, no | matter who runs it. Still a good improvement over the current | status quo, I'll agree. Flawed as they may be, Spotify and | Youtube did end up boosting independent creative production and | accessibility of content manifold. | nivenkos wrote: | But government naturally has a monopoly. | | Like the US already forces publishers to send books to the | Library of Congress with the mandatory deposit. | SunlightEdge wrote: | I will miss Z-Library... I hope it's alternatives are as good as | it... | | I linked it to an old email account of mine. Could there be | repercussions if you downloaded books from that site? I probably | downloaded at least 1k dollars worth of books. Only about half I | ever went into. | jl2718 wrote: | I looked up the actual citation. Here's what I found interesting: | | Copyright theft became a crime (versus tort) in 1990 and only | applied to the sale of physical copies. It expanded to digital | distribution in 2008. | | https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/506 | SergeAx wrote: | Release says "defendants profited illegally off work they stole". | I wonder what the charges would be if they were runnig Z-Lib as a | non-profit? | dang wrote: | Related: | | _Feds Seize One of the Largest Sites for Pirated Books and | Articles, Z-Library_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33570539 - Nov 2022 (6 | comments) | | _Z-Library Aftermath Reveals the Feds Seized Dozens of Domain | Names_ - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33530240 - Nov 2022 | (73 comments) | | _ZLibrary domains have been seized by the United States Postal | Inspection Service_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33460970 - Nov 2022 (517 | comments) | | _Z Library_ - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29365627 - | Nov 2021 (36 comments) | | _Zshelf: Z-Library books downloader for reMarkable tablet_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26355778 - March 2021 (51 | comments) | sharperguy wrote: | Burn down the library of Alexandria because free access to | information is too inconvenient | reisse wrote: | I guess in 2022 "don't ever travel to countries that have | extradition agreements with US" should've already been #0 opsec | rule, above everything else. | | Sad for them. Does anyone know if Z-library provided torrent | dumps? | gadders wrote: | Apparently yes: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32972923 | newsclues wrote: | Extradition agreements are irrelevant when extraordinary | rendition is a legal and valid option. | voakbasda wrote: | Ummm, aren't those extrajudicial? Or have I watched too many | movies? | from wrote: | > Iorizzo did travel to Panama City, on his private jet. | But his stay was cut short when two unidentified locals | kidnapped him at gunpoint and put him on a plane to Miami. | He arrived into the welcoming arms of F.B.I. agent Dan | Lyons | | https://www.vanityfair.com/news/1991/02/john-gotti-joe- | colum... | | https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB834595561730973500 | | Yes but at the end of the day there is nothing you can do | about because there is no constitutional right to be a | fugitive and the country you were kidnapped from either | doesn't care or isn't competent enough to do anything about | it. | hggh wrote: | https://ia801505.us.archive.org/view_archive.php?archive=/17... | adamors wrote: | As Russian nationals, their choices are rather limited at this | time. | reisse wrote: | Given the political climate, they could easily ban Russian | books from their platform and live happily in Moscow. Surely | I'd prefer that over US custody. | untech wrote: | > live happily in Moscow | | Not an option for a majority of people who would host an | online library, sadly. You can't live happily in Moscow at | the moment if you are capable of intellectual labour. | cft wrote: | It's intersection of these two sets: https://en.wikipedia.org | /wiki/List_of_United_States_extradit... | | https://visaguide.world/visa-free-countries/russian- | passport... | rexreed wrote: | My suggestion to Russian nationals who are engaged in crime: | stay in Russia. | keewee7 wrote: | No? The countries that don't have extradition agreements with | the US overlap a lot with countries that have friendly | relations with Russia. | | China, Cuba, and Russia would be the ideal choices if you're | on the run from US authorities. | zinekeller wrote: | > China, Cuba, and Russia would be the ideal choices if | you're on the run from US authorities. | | (this is specific to Z-library) | | Russia is out. Some books on the platform directly | contradicts government ideals, and it seems that the | operators aren't willing to filter it out. | | China might be a safe case, but recently they have cared | for IP (at least for literary things, industrial processes | are another matter) because they have multiple industries | that China saw as beneficial (both audiovisual and | literacy, including comics) so they could evade US | authorities but might get sentenced by Chinese authorities | anyway. | | I don't know enough about Cuba to comment. | untech wrote: | Argentina on the first glance would look "safe" to me, as | South American nations seem in general not very pro-US. | Live and learn, I guess. TIL that _all_ South American | countries have these extradition agreements. | | I feel bad for the arrested; even if their values were not | pristine. Punishments for these kind of "offences" seem | extremely harsh to me, being grown in a copyright-unaware | climate. | ankaAr wrote: | Where is "not very pro-america"?! | | Maybe not the actual government, but from saving in | dollars to travelling we are very pro-american. | | If we divide the world in pro-america, pro-europe, pro- | rusia, pro-china, for us is Europe and America, and very | far away the other options. | | So, bad luck for this guy. Bro, Che Guevara died decades | ago... | CyanBird wrote: | > Where is "not very pro-america"?! | | Brazil left despises the US after the coup. Bolivian | right wants more US help to do another | | Venezuela gov despises the US | | Chilean left looks down on the US | | Argentinian left is not US friendly, at most could be | seen as transactional with the US. They really need help | from world bank and imf | | Bolivian left abhors the US, Bolivian right wants US | support for a new coup | | Paraguay is just doing its drug smuggling like they | always do | | Uruguay is in the process of signing a free trade | agreement with China while US southern command is trying | to avoid it from happening | | Peruvian left is not friendly to US, Peruvian right has | been working with US assistance against Peruvian left for | a while to try and kneecap it | | Ecuador is famously very anti-US and wouldn't deport | Assange until he became excessibly annoying to deal with | in the embassy | | Colombia is a US puppet oligarchy. New gov is | interesting, but it is still an oligarchy | | Panama is a defacto neo-colony of the US | | Puerto Rico is a literal colony of the US | | Centro America with exception of Mexico is a mishmash of | neo-colonies literally using USD as their base currencies | or detest the US in some form | | So yeah... | untech wrote: | Yeah, I was describing a perspective of a russia-born | person who never actually travelled to the western | hemisphere and whose knowledge of South American | countries are formed by ambient osmosis, not active | research. I know that no South American country supports | the recent russian invasion (and thank god for that), but | I was under the (apparently wrong) impression that there | were non-trivial factions opposing the US. Ambient | propaganda got to me, I guess. Sorry. | UncleEntity wrote: | I doubt Venezuela would have extradited them but mostly | all the countries in the Americas are on friendly terms. | | Of course there's your standard disagreements between | neighbors but, as far as I know, there's no outright | hostilities going on. Well, outside of some rebels and | narco groups. Not like the 80s where the Soviets were | stirring up trouble at least. | ankaAr wrote: | Venezuela, Cuba, Nicaragua, Honduras?, el salvador.., I | don't know if those countries have extradition agreements | with usa. | roel_v wrote: | "Does anyone know if Z-library provided torrent dumps? " | | They didn't, but pilimi.org does (have to access via Tor to get | the torrents). That said, there have been 0 seeders since the | original ZLib bust. | https://twitter.com/AnnaArchivist/status/1592654308516179970 | (pilimi author) says there should be an http mirror now, and | I'm probably stupid but I can't find it anywhere. Seems to me | it's the end of Z-Library. The end of an era, really. | dartharva wrote: | Here it is: https://annas-archive.org/ | | I sincerely hope Anna stays safe though. They can (and will) | come for her and her team too. | [deleted] | woadwarrior01 wrote: | Now, do SBF. | [deleted] | [deleted] | dartharva wrote: | Too many Copyright defenders here, mandatory "the intellectual | property oxymoron" read: | http://harmful.cat-v.org/economics/intellectual_property/ | SpelingBeeChamp wrote: | I don't think it was your intention, but your language is | unnecessarily inflammatory. | | People who don't share your opinion are allowed to be here. | Even if there are more of those people than you'd like. | ReptileMan wrote: | Wish them luck. Zlib was a godsend. Let's hope they won't be | extradited. | mrkramer wrote: | I had an idea for books shop website where you would buy a book | and get it in paperback, audiobook and e-book form all at | once(bundle). Ofc it would be bit pricey but readers could swap | between formats at will and writers would be more rewarded and | subsidized. Would anybody use it? | | Somebody who pirates books in the e-form maybe would want to | enjoy it in paperback and audio form as well? | uni_baconcat wrote: | I respect the copyright of publisher and author, I also admire | people sharing expensive knowledge to those who do not have the | ability to get one. This is a hard choice to me. | prox wrote: | I actually bought more books by checking out the book first for | free (often the sample part of an electronic book is not | helpful) But I might not be representative. | ApolloFortyNine wrote: | The problem with allowing piracy will always be that no one | really wants to spend money. Just because I have a spare $200 | doesn't mean I want to spend it if I don't have to. | | If you give people the choice between free and $x amount, 99% | of people will choose free. You see this with just about | anything that let's people name their own price. | shahidkarimi wrote: | I will make it live again. | josh_fyi wrote: | I was delighted when my book showed up on Z-library! I of course | was never paid for authoring that book; indeed I paid a | subvention to publish it with Harvard University Press. At some | point, the rights were sold to the giant publisher Brill, which | was charging $30 per chapter for a book that has no value by | chapter. | | Luckily, some kind soul at University of Marburg uploaded it and | Library Genesis still has it. | | https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/141915/ | | https://libgen.is/search.php?req=Joshua%20Fox&column[]=autho... | RHSeeger wrote: | If you didn't get paid for writing the book, how did the | copyright transfer to someone else (so that they could sell | it)? Or the transferable rights to print/distribute it, if | that's what we're talking about here. | josh_fyi wrote: | I signed away rights to the President and Fellows of Harvard | College (the legal name in this context for Harvard). That | was not a problem as it was clear to me that this would not | be a money-maker for anyone. The business-side was handled by | Eisenbrauns, a small publisher. When the owner retired, the | business sold to Penn State. Later, the Harvard Semitic | Museum (the part of Harvard in charge of the series) sold the | rights to Brill. I am guessing that Harvard Semitic Museum | saw this as a chance to get a little bit of money out of | their asset, and Brill saw this as a cow to milk to death, | the way the price for legacy software is raised to sky-high | levels as the product dies. And indeed, I am guessing that | Brill is not making much -- no one did. | https://www.sspnet.org/community/news/brill-announces- | collab... | harshreality wrote: | Is that contract valid? What did _you_ receive of value in | exchange for signing away your copyright? | bombcar wrote: | I assume getting it into print was the "item of value" | Joshua received. | sitkack wrote: | I know two instances of authors uploading their own books to | libgen. Both esoteric academic books that they were not paid to | write. | kragen wrote: | three | Balgair wrote: | Reminds me of how Orwell preferred to write introductions to | _1984_ only for illegal reprints behind the iron curtain. I can | 't find the exact quote but he said that he'd write it for that | audience alone as he knew without a doubt that they would read | his introduction. If I ever actually write a book, I hope I | have enough courage to do the same and only write introductions | for cracked copies. You know the audience actually cares if | they are willing to risk the fuzz just to read. | keewee7 wrote: | IIRC Z-library is a LibGen mirror that is faster than other | mirrors but is also much more monetized with more ads, limited | free downloads, and premium plans. | | Something else weird about this story is why did they move to a | country that has an extradition agreement with the US? There are | plenty of countries that would ignore US pressure to arrest them. | droopyEyelids wrote: | If you have no idea what you're talking about, post your | comment as a question instead of a statement full of inaccurate | misconceptions | AkshatJ27 wrote: | > Z-Library is a popular (and illegal) library. They have taken | the Library Genesis collection and made it easily searchable. | On top of that, they have become very effective at soliciting | new book contributions, by incentivizing contributing users | with various perks. They currently do not contribute these new | books back to Library Genesis. And unlike Library Genesis, they | do not make their collection easily mirrorable, which prevents | wide preservation. This is important to their business model, | since they charge money for accessing their collection in bulk | (more than 10 books per day). | | (http://annas-blog.org/blog-3x-new-books.html) | [deleted] | bjord wrote: | it seems like their collection began as a libgen mirror, but | expanded far beyond it (and was definitely heavily monetized) | | the move might've had something to do with mobilization in | russia, though I'm just guessing | ajot wrote: | I don't know their specific reasons, but I know of some | transnational companies that since the start of the russian | invasion dissolved their russian division and told their | employees to choose from a list of countries to relocate. | | Argentina is very easy to migrate to (the preamble to our | constitution marks the spirit of a nation "free for all men | that want to live here") and quality of life isn't that bad. | henry_viii wrote: | Sad day. I always talked about Z-library with reverence. | Z-library was the only way I could access textbooks I was | interested in when I was growing up in a developing country. I | owe it to Z-library for becoming the software developer I am | today. | prisoner655321 wrote: | A sad day for equal access to information. I'm glad that they | made money from Z-Library, they deserve that money for the | service they provided. | | It's some bullshit that they were arrested in Argentina on behalf | of the US government. From what I can tell they aren't even US | nationals. I know the US scooping up foreigners and locking them | away is nothing new (see: Gitmo) but it remains a travesty of | justice nonetheless. | yewenjie wrote: | TorrentFreak report has some extra details - | https://torrentfreak.com/u-s-indicts-two-russians-for-runnin... | DoingIsLearning wrote: | A small thought experiment: | | - Book sales in 2021 were about _9_ billion dollars. [0] | | - Wage theft in the US is estimated at _50_ billion dollars. [1] | | Can you imagine if the resources of the justice and labour | departments would prioritize citizen wage over publishers' | revenue? | | Would you rather have funds allocated towards social justice or | have them spent on intimidating foreign nationals completely | outside US jurisdiction? | | [0] https://www.statista.com/statistics/197710/annual-book- | store... | | [1] https://www.epi.org/press/wage-theft-costs-american- | workers-... | dr-detroit wrote: | leephillips wrote: | What these criminals were doing _is_ wage theft. As someone who | earns money from books, I would like to personally thank the US | Justice Department for their excellent work in shutting down | this operation, that was stealing my wages. | [deleted] | dimva wrote: | Wage theft is committed by millions of employers, this "theft" | was committed by just a few people. While I agree with your | general sentiment, the resources required to prosecute wage | theft would be vastly greater than to prosecute this case. | | That being said, they should definitely prosecute wage theft | much more than they are now. Maybe the fear of jail time if | wage theft were actually prosecuted a few times would deter | most other potential wage thieves. | burkaman wrote: | I don't really agree, prosecuting _all_ wage theft would be | an enormous effort, but this story is not about prosecuting | all book "theft", just one case. The argument is that the | resources spent on this one case would have been better spent | on investigating and prosecuting wage theft, not solving the | entire issue. | | Also, wage theft seems to be a much simpler thing to | prosecute. You don't have to investigate the owners of | anonymous websites or track down any foreign nationals, just | show up to a job site, see how long people are working, see | how much they're paid, and prosecute if the numbers don't | match. Obviously I'm exaggerating, but it's a much more | tangible, sort of "old-fashioned" crime, one I would imagine | the FBI is pretty good at solving. | retconn wrote: | DoingIsLearning wrote: | > Wage theft is committed by millions of employers... | | Yes, and of those there are a handful doing it to millions of | employees. Wage theft is not a few night shifts rounded off | at SMEs. Plenty of traded companies doing it, no reason why | you cannot target low numbers of big fish. | JumpCrisscross wrote: | > _there are a handful doing it to millions of employees_ | | Has someone credibly identified them? | DoingIsLearning wrote: | Both Walmart and Amazon are notorious for disregarding | minimum wage laws as an example of 'big fish'. With the | fines usually applied this is just the price of doing | business for these companies. | | https://thehill.com/regulation/court- | battles/275064-supreme-... | | https://www.theverge.com/2021/2/2/22262294/amazon-flex- | wage-... | 1letterunixname wrote: | Will never happen just like how undocumented migrants are | exploited by meat processing plants while being de-facto | shielded from deportation... because corporations and money | talk. | WeylandYutani wrote: | In my country wage theft is committed on migrant labour. | | Western Europe is not much different than Quatar in that | respect only nobody cares. | kwhitefoot wrote: | You are right that it happens, but people do care and | enforcement is improving in at least several countries like | the UK and Norway. | tomp wrote: | Are the immigrants' passports confiscated so that they | cannot leave? | | If you genuinely believe that, why don't you move to Qatar? | loloquwowndueo wrote: | The world starts caring when the Olympics or World Cup come | to a country. I hadn't even heard about Qatar prior to them | hosting the World Cup. | FormerBandmate wrote: | The Olympics and World Cup have come to Western Europe | (e.g. England, France, Norway, Spain) over and over again | achenet wrote: | Never been to Norway or Spain, but England and France are | generally okay w.r.t. migrant labor. Not saying there | isn't some hostility to foreigners, because ceterus | paribus you'll get many more job interviews with a CV | that says "Jean-Pierre Petit" than "Mohammed Karkar" in | France, but there is no "temporary worker visa" that we | can use to basically exploit peoples from poor countries. | If you get a visa that lets you work, you generally get | the same protections/wages as locals :) | jiveturkey wrote: | Sleep deprivation of just 10 min per night across the entire | USA adult population of 330M is 3.3Bn minutes, is over 6 | thousand YEARS of sleep related fatigue, etc. _PER NIGHT_ | | Can you imagine if we attacked that problem in earnest? | | My point, obviously, is that 50 billion is nothing on a per | capita basis. This arrest is very high leverage, and very | effective use of resources. | DoingIsLearning wrote: | Your argument that this problem is too distributed is valid | but a little out of touch. Wage theft disproprionately | affects lower income people. | | There is about 39 million americans below poverty line. | That's about 1200 dollars a year. I am sure it would actually | make a hell of a big difference to many people below the | poverty line. | nivenkos wrote: | But piracy affects the capitalists that run the US | establishment, whereas wage theft benefits them. | lc9er wrote: | I have family that works for DOL's Wage & Hour division. The | amount of wage theft is _staggering_. They are chronically | understaffed and overworked. Plus, every time a Republican | administration comes into power, their enforcement power gets | severely limited, except in the most egregious cases. | theandrewbailey wrote: | When people get paid more, the government gets more tax | revenue. Smart government would double this division's | resources, but governments are anything but smart. | comprev wrote: | Government may get more revenue but the individual | politicians get influenced through financial means provided | by the companies stealing the wages. | | Corporates want their pound of flesh for lobbying expenses. | ironfootnz wrote: | In theory yes, but if you don't pay and use the money for | Lobby, you get power, which equals to more rights. That's | the foundation of a democracy or let's say society from the | times of Pharaos. | agumonkey wrote: | non naive suggestion: new nation scale govt structure | should be discussed and tried. | | hybrid patterns, seasonal structures, whatever | | There are lots of low hanging fruits, which is good because | it means space for progress but govt are extremely good at | diluting any improvement efforts. Yet most people want | higher efficiency / sanity governments. | kevin_thibedeau wrote: | One party wants a disenfranchised base that will keep | voting for them. If they are made whole by the government | they might start having wrongthink. | woodruffw wrote: | This would run counter to the "starve the beast"[1] | strategy that's formed the core of conservative governance | in the US for the last 50 years. | | [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starve_the_beast | akira2501 wrote: | If you believe in small government then you're going to | enact policies that accomplish this. Re-branding this as | "starve the beast" seems nothing more than a propaganda | exercise. | | Further.. almost every business employing people in a | State must be setup with that State's authorities. Is | there some reason States can't handle wage theft? Is this | naturally a federal problem, or even best solved at that | level? | munk-a wrote: | I _strongly_ disagree. If you 're in favor of small | government and in control you would, absent political | concerns, simply shutter government organizations you | don't believe in. "Starve the beast" is an entirely | different tactic where you don't want to be seen as | destroying popular services and so, instead, undermine | their ability to function efficiently until they become | unpopular enough to cancel. It comes with an | understanding that the majority of the political will in | a country appreciates these programs when they're well | funded and that their cancelation is only politically | actionable when they've been starved to ineffectualness. | | "Starve the beast" is also really only a realistic | strategy in a corrupt duopoly like America has since the | defunding of popular programs is generally political | suicide - unless you can reduce everything to "Us vs. | Them"ism. | shakezula wrote: | It's a term that was _coined by_ fiscal conservatives, | it's not a "rebranding as a propaganda exercise". | woodruffw wrote: | That's not my branding, or a re-branding at all: the | first known use of the term was by a Libertarian party | member. It's _the_ term of art for this style of | financial governance, one that is used somewhat proudly | by its disciples. | | It's a problem for both state governments _and_ the | Federal government: wage theft might span from state tax | fraud, federal tax fraud, unemployment insurance fraud, | federal contract falsification, etc. Making it into a | states ' issue is overly simplistic. | bob234 wrote: | andsoitis wrote: | > Wage theft in the US is estimated at _50_ billion dollars. | [1] | | That report is from 2014. What does it stand at today (whether | in absolute or relative terms)? | 2OEH8eoCRo0 wrote: | > completely outside US jurisdiction | | > The pair was arrested on November 3, 2022 in Cordoba, | Argentina at the request of the United States. | | The government of Argentina disagrees. | DoingIsLearning wrote: | Extradition agreements is not the same as US law being | applied in Argentinian soil. | ckw wrote: | So copyright is incentivizing only $9 billion of spending on | books... This seems suboptimal. You'd think it'd be possible to | design a different government scheme that yielded say, twice as | much book publishing, but with no restriction on copying. Same | thing for music. | phpisthebest wrote: | >>Would you rather have funds allocated towards social justice | or have them spent on intimidating foreign nationals | | I would rather the justice department, and labor dept choose | their targets for non-political reasons, neither for "social | justice" nor corporate protectionism | rfrey wrote: | It must be one of the triumphs of capitalism that forcing | employers to pay their workers what they're owed is | considered a partisan action. | Arkhaine_kupo wrote: | > I would rather the justice department, and labor dept | choose their targets for non-political reasons | | You want the justice department, a branch of the goverment, | to not be political? | luckylion wrote: | > You want the justice department, a branch of the | goverment, to not be political? | | This is like asking "you want the fire dept to not be | political?" | | Of course you don't want the executive branch to not be | political. They are the _administration_. If the IRS just | goes after whoever the current reigning party doesn 't | like, you'll soon no longer have a functioning democracy. | phpisthebest wrote: | Yes. That should not be a shock, there are lots (in fact | most) of government that is not suppose to be political, | specifically when it comes to the enforcement of law. | | The entire premise, the entire legitimacy of the legal | system is the blind scales of justice. | | It seems you want it to be political, that is would be a | nation of despotism, oligarchs, and tyranny | Arkhaine_kupo wrote: | > that is not suppose to be political | | their execution shouldn't but their priortiies are | entirely political mandates. | | When people felt unsafe in the 90s and the DoJ increased | minimum sentencing was that not a political incentive? | | Protecting business over people, as it currently stands | in their priority list, is a political decision. | | Changing the status quo is not "political" and remaining | as is isn't. Their current directives are poltiical | assignments, and rerouting resources in a more worthy | endevour is the same. | phpisthebest wrote: | >When people felt unsafe in the 90s and the DoJ increased | minimum sentencing was that not a political incentive? | | No that was a change in legalization, which legislation | is political, but the 90's saw TONS of anti-crime laws | passed which required the non-political arms of the | government to act | | that is how it is suppose to work, the people elect | representative who pass laws, and then those laws are | enforced by the non-political arm. | | These entities have become political in the wake of over | criminalization since now as a function they have to | "choose" which laws to enforce and which not to because | other wise nothing would get enforced as a matter of | course. | | The solution to this is not just acceptation that | enforcement should be political, but instead removing the | political choices from the non-political arms placing it | back into the political space of the government (i.e the | legislature) . One key way to do that for the Federal | government is to return said federal government back to | its constitutional bounds which today it FAR FAR FAR FAR | FAR exceeds | Arkhaine_kupo wrote: | > The solution to this is not just acceptation that | enforcement should be criminal, but instead removing the | political choices from the non-political arms placing it | back into the political space of the government (i.e the | legislature) . | | The assumption that there are too many laws and "non | political" arms need to pick and choose which ones to | apply is true. But I would consider that just part of | reality. | | Economics is just the study of resource allocation, the | goverment only has so many federal tax officers and they | need to focus on something. If they focus on big accounts | it doesn't make not paying VAT legal. It just less likely | you get caught. | | Laws existing as a framework to express the current | priorities of the goverment (aka tax avoidance bad) is | useful even without enough officers to enforce it 100%. | | > One key way to do that for the Federal government is to | return said federal government back to its constitutional | bounds which today it FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR exceeds | | The libertarian angle is cool and all, but the political | voice of the people has consistently voted for bigger gov | not smaller, so you want to apply your own politics to | make things "non poltiical". Which is not very consistent | Clent wrote: | What do you mean by 'social justice' and the implication it | is a bad thing? | | I postulate, labor justice is social justice. | phpisthebest wrote: | "Social Justice" is a loaded political term generally | aligned with Left Authoritarianism and often devoid of | actual justice | dredmorbius wrote: | And who was it who loaded that term? The social justice | advocates, or their opponents? | phpisthebest wrote: | Both. Just like many other political labels, they start | out as one thing then more and more people start using | the labels and soon their orginal meaning is lost and | have become something else | | This is caused by both advocates and opponents of the | various causes, positions, and world views | wellareyousure wrote: | peoplefromibiza wrote: | _In 1993, the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action | treats social justice as a purpose of human rights education_ | | The declaration was signed by the US as well. | | So social justice is an objective of US as a whole, as a | democracy, as a Country, hence is not a political view since | 1993 in USA. | wesapien wrote: | a broken democracy but a highly functional oligarchhy | JumpCrisscross wrote: | > _declaration was signed by the US_ | | It was never fully ratified [1]. It _was_ ratified by | Russia and, somehow, Afghanistan. | | [1] https://indicators.ohchr.org/ | peoplefromibiza wrote: | That's hardly news. | | But you're looking in the wrong place. | | It was called the "Vienna Declaration and Programme of | Action" it was not an agreement to be ratified, but a | course of action for the UN members to follow, which | includes the US. | | Of course in United States social justice is seen as a | political stance, it's not surprising from the country | that has signed and not ratified | | - Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of | Discrimination against Women | | - International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural | Rights | | - Convention on the Rights of the Child (they do not | actually think of the children, apparently) | | - Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities | | I get that the rights of people with disabilities can be | a divisive argument, but they also refuted to sign for | | - Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination | of All Forms of Discrimination against Women | | - Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on | Civil and Political Rights | | - Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on | Economic, Social and Cultural Rights | | - Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and | Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment | | and if that wasn't bad enough, they have also not signed | | - International Convention on the Protection of the | Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their | Families | | - International Convention for the Protection of all | Persons from Enforced Disappearance (CIA really loves | making people disappear, they couldn't possibly | disappoint them) | | How is it possible that we call it "the greatest | democracy in the World" while they are not even a real | Democracy is the "greatest mystery in modern history" | | So, yeah, social justice is political only in USA and | probably in some South American dictatorship lead by | former nazis and militarily installed by yours truly the | USA | | Not even Putin would say in public that social justice | it's the patrimony of a specific Political side, because | it would be a (politcal) suicide, even for a guy like | Vladimir Putin who recently spoke about it citing Martin | Luther King (of course it's all propaganda in his side, | but still...), while in the USA, where MLK was born and | was killed, his ideas are still considered "agenda" and | not "Country's own values". | | Again: not surprising, just sad. | | > It was ratified by Russia and, somehow, Afghanistan. | | to put it mildly, in that list, as you can see, USA is | the country that ratified fewer treaties. | | Even Iran ratified one treaty more than US. | | Actually there is one that did worse: Bhutan, with zero | of them. | JumpCrisscross wrote: | > _yeah, social justice is political only in USA_ | | You're shifting your goal posts. You said "social justice | is an objective of US as a whole" and hence "not a | political view." That's false. | | > _Even Iran ratified one treaty more than US_ | | Which shows the difference. Ratification, in America, is | not performative. Those treaties can become the basis for | lawsuits against the U.S. in U.S. courts. If you're | arguing women have a better time in Iran, or civic and | political rights are better protected in Russia, because | they ratified those chapters, I've got a bridge to sell | you. | peoplefromibiza wrote: | > You're shifting your goal posts. You said "social | justice is an objective of US as a whole" and hence "not | a political view." That's false. | | If you're saying that US usually says one thing, and does | another thing entirely, you're right. | | When someone signs an official document in representation | of their Country, they are actually saying that the | Country's objective align with the things written in the | document. | | They signed a document that stated that social justice is | not political, it's a human right. | | You're now saying that's false in the US. | | So either you or the US are lying. | | > Which shows the difference. Ratification, in America, | is not performative | | like the ratification of | | _International Convention on the Elimination of All | Forms of Racial Discrimination_ | | in 1994? | | Are we there yet? | | > Those treaties can become the basis for lawsuits | against the U.S. in U.S. courts | | Lawsuits, like the first of a long list a guy named | Donald Trump had to face for his act of racism, in 1973, | for refusing to rent houses to black people? | | That totally blocked him from becoming President of | United States and from running again at the next | elections. | | Because in USA nothing is performative. | | Trump BTW was at least honest in treating things the rest | of the World consider global as internal political | arguments; when he felt that climate change wasn't | important to his administration, he withdrawn from the | Paris climate accord. | | Seriously, you're talking like the US is the only country | with the rule of law, where the ratification of an | International treaty has actual legal consequences. | | How come that Countries like Italy, France, Germany, even | MONGOLIA, ratified all of them or more than 90% of them | and US did not? | | Are you saying that in Finland they have no justice | system or engage in "performative treaty signing" as a | cultural tribal tradition? | | > If you're arguing women have a better time in Iran, or | civic and political rights are better protected in | Russia, because they ratified those chapters, I've got a | bridge to sell you. | | I've simply argued that they committed to the cause and | failed. | | US hasn't even tried. | | If, as you say, they didn't out of fear of _" lawsuits | against the U.S. in U.S. courts"_ does that mean that you | think US know that they do not meet the requirements? | JumpCrisscross wrote: | > _you 're saying that US usually says one thing, and | does another thing entirely, you're right_ | | No. I am saying you said "social justice is an objective | of US as a whole" and hence "not a political view." Then | you said "social justice is political only in USA." Those | are opposing views you've flip flopped on. | | > _signed a document that stated that social justice is | not political, it 's a human right_ | | No, it did not. | | > _like the ratification of International Convention on | the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination in | 1994?_ | | You're launching off solely titles. Read the text [1]. | Article 5 enumerates rights. The rest is condemnations | and the establishment of a commission. China, Saudi | Arabia and Israel are also a signatories [2]. None of | them give Article 14 jurisdiction, the U.S. included, | which made it a toothless ratification. | | [1] https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments- | mechanisms/instruments/... | | [2] https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments- | mechanisms/instruments/... | [deleted] | phpisthebest wrote: | >>USA is the country that ratified fewer treaties. | | yes, by design. We have a strong belief in our | Sovereignty, We the people have no desire to be ruled by | the UN or treaty, and International Treaties are | generally viewed unfavorably by the public (correctly | so). In fact most Citizens of the US (including myself) | hold the UN in utter contempt and would support a | withdraw (including our money) from the UN | | Also no Treaty supersedes our Constitution. | christophilus wrote: | I agree with you, but it's always easier to go after a | centralized target who is doing a thing at scale. Is there a | wage-thief who's doing it at scale? | glogla wrote: | I'm sure e.g. Walmart would have few billions in their name. | Arkhaine_kupo wrote: | > Is there a wage-thief who's doing it at scale? | | FAANG got caught having a wage cartel where poaching affected | possible salaries between workers. | | They got a measly 50 million dollar fine. | | Wage theft pays off in america, and Amazon and Apple being | trillion dollar companies proves it. | JumpCrisscross wrote: | > _FAANG got caught having a wage cartel_ | | I remember Apple and Google did. Was there a broader | conspiracy? | | > _got a measly 50 million dollar fine_ | | This $415mm settlement [1]? Its suit covered "almost 65,000 | employees who worked for the seven companies between 2005 | and 2010." The fine was thus about $6,400 per covered | employee (about $8k in 2022 dollars). The alleged cut to | "potential employee compensation [was] 10 percent to 15 | percent" [2]. That didn't pertain to every single employee, | so the actual cost per violation is higher. That doesn't | seem egregiously low. | | [1] https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/apple-google- | others-... | | [2] https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/lawsuit- | accuses-appl... | Arkhaine_kupo wrote: | > I remember Apple and Google did. Was there a broader | conspiracy? | | I wrote FAANG cause I didn't remember all involved, which | was my bad. It was Adobe, Apple Inc., Google, Intel, | Intuit, Pixar, Lucasfilm and eBay that got caught in the | anti trust suit. | | Enough big players to seriously affect job opportunities | and labour costs from rising. | | > This $415mm settlement [1]? | | That was the latest judge sentence, which I hadn't heard | of, I can ammend my previous comment. The original | sentences, affecting mostly the smaller players like | Pixar where much smaller while the Apple and Google one | kept being pushed back. 400 million is still quite low in | exchange for a 5 year long wage freeze essentially as | moving jobs is the best way to increase your salary. | | The toal pay seems to be lower, 3,400 for Pixar, intuit | and lucasfilm employees and only 5,770 for apple and | google employees. Over a 5 year period thats a pretty low | salary raise. | | Considering a job change every 2 years can end up with | almost 100% salary difference over a decade. That means | in the 5 years, the salary raises saved the company up to | 50% in salary costs. | | With the headcount of both of those companies and their | average salary. Even if the percentage of workers who did | not move between companies, I would argue 400 million is | still low. | | I am also gonna ignore lawyer fees which are usually the | only winners on such big lawsuits | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High- | Tech_Employee_Antitrust_L... | JumpCrisscross wrote: | > _I would argue 400 million is still low_ | | Low, but not so low that it makes wage conspiracies worth | it. | sudosysgen wrote: | It definitely makes it worth it if you merely risk but | are not guaranteed to lose about as much as you underpaid | and avoid compounding increases. | Arkhaine_kupo wrote: | If there average payout is 5,770 per employee and the | average salary jump while changing jobs is 10-20%. | | The math is pretty in favour of having a wage conspiracy, | thats without even considering the cost of not being | caught. | | Chance of being caught * average salary * cost of | poaching * average salary rise due to poaching * number | of employees / fine | | Maybe my napkin math is wrong but the chance of being | caught has to be very high and the average salary or | number of employees very low for it to make any sense. | | And being google and apple in california, the employee | and salary is not gonna be low... | jrnichols wrote: | My industry got it pretty bad too. California passed Prop | 11, which wiped out a wage theft lawsuit, and also ensured | that we do not get to clock out for meal breaks. | | https://missionlocal.org/2018/10/prop-11-ambulance- | company-h... | zb1plus wrote: | Couldn't agree more. It is disgraceful how our tax dollars are | used to prop up failed business models and oppress the little | guy. Just another example of how supposedly democratic states | only serve the interests of the elite. | [deleted] | Vt71fcAqt7 wrote: | >It is disgraceful how our tax dollars are used to prop up | failed business models and oppress the little guy | | U.S. Government Spending, FY 2022 Top 10 Spending by Category | | $ 1.22 T Social Security | | $ 914 B Health | | $ 865 B Income Security | | $ 767 B National Defense | | $ 755 B Medicare | | $ 677 B Education, Training, Employment, and Social Services | | How do you explain this data? | | Source:https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/americas-finance- | guide/feder... | denvrede wrote: | Genuine question: I always hear about the gigantic military | spending in the U.S. I would've expected it to be on top of | this list. It can't be only 7. no? | WillPostForFood wrote: | When talking about spending, some people exclude programs | like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, income security | programs from their list of spending because it doesn't | need to be approved every year - it is classified as | 'Mandatory Spending' and is 63% of the budget. | | The remaining spending, has to be approved every year is | classified as 'Discretionary Spending'. When you just | look at discretionary spending, the military budget is | the biggest piece. But if someone says the US spends most | of its budget on military spending, it is false and | deceptive. | karaterobot wrote: | A lot of military spending is disguised (not to say | maliciously) as funding to other agencies. For example, | that number is probably just the Pentagon's budget, and | wouldn't include things like Veterans Affairs (which is | about $300 billion) or foreign aid (around $50 billion) | or the Department of Homeland Security (around $50 | billion) or our nuclear force ($35 billion), etc. | | Even some of NASA's funding is for monitoring nukes. | | The point is that it's actually kind of hard to calculate | how much we spend on defense, because it's hard to know | what to count, but it's certainly more than it looks | like. Over $1 trillion is a safe guess. | zmgsabst wrote: | Are you expecting a source better than the US treasury to | appear? | | An unfortunate reality of the US is that policy | discussion is almost wholly disconnected from quantified | reality: we're not even arguing about facts, anymore. | | If we started examining facts, the populace would become | aware that the US pays more for less than other | "developed" nations -- largely due to corruption in | healthcare, construction, and manufacturing (eg, | military). | bombcar wrote: | US military spending is HUGE compared to other countries | budgets. It is not that big compared to the US budget - | in WW2 we spent about 45% of GDP on military stuff - if | that was done today we'd have a budget of about _ten | trillion dollars_. | | Also much of what is classified as military spending | could probably be moved to other categories - the VA, for | example. | kranke155 wrote: | Wow. Imagine the Manhattan Projects you could make with | ten trillion! | artificial wrote: | The Manhattan Project began modestly in 1939, but grew to | employ more than 130,000 people and cost nearly US$2 | billion (equivalent to about $23 billion in 2020). We're | nearing $100 billion with Ukraine. $31 billion to | California EDD (unemployment) fraud. | thestevesie wrote: | Its large compared to other similar countries. | | So why doesn't the US just spend that money so we can be | more like X trendy country I heard about on Y | blog/podcast that is a fraction of the size of the US and | does "EVERYTHING" better? | | Well, the case is that they have more money to spend | because the US is subsidizing their military. So many of | these countries are able to get away with tiny military | budgets because of the US's large military budget. (all | of those countries are also unrecoverably in decline) | PartiallyTyped wrote: | the US does not subsidise other countries, not to the | degree that you think anyways. | | It's also not a matter of spending more money. The US | spends a lot more per capita on healthcare than everyone | else, so money is not the issue. | slongfield wrote: | US military spending means that other countries don't | need to spend as much. | | For example, the US Navy does a lot of anti-piracy work | to stabilize world maritime trade. This has obvious | benefits to the United States, but also benefits others | (e.g., the Danish shipping company Maersk). | kneebonian wrote: | It may not be direct subsidiaries but I'd be willing to | wager a pretty penny that there are a lot of European | countries that feel comfortable with spending little on | defense and aren't worrying about Russia because they | know the US has their back. | | Not to mention keeping Taiwan from being brought under | the CCP umbrella, the efforts the US Navy puts into | preventing and reducing piracy. In fact most of the world | that doesn't worry about imminent invasion from it's | neighbors doesn't worry mostly because the US has | provided almost global security by virtue of having the | largest most capable military on the planet. | | I won't pretend it is perfect or that we have global | peace but like during Pax Romana although they were still | squabbling with the Sassinids, the average person's risk | of dying as a result of military conflict is very small | when compared historically, especially since almost every | military action in the past half century has been not | between modern nation states but between guerrilla and | partisan forces which results in considerably less damage | in life and property than a full scale conflict between | two capable actors as the Iran Iraq war proves. | pas wrote: | not really, US healthcare spending is average for US | income. (the problem is the distribution of that income) | | https://randomcriticalanalysis.com/2020/02/13/its-still- | not-... | jwilk wrote: | Why 7? | calibas wrote: | According to a different official government site, it's | $1.2 T on National Defense... | | https://www.usaspending.gov/explorer/budget_function | Vt71fcAqt7 wrote: | Thanks for that link. It also shows medicare as increased | to $1.5 T | jamiek88 wrote: | Yeah but we paid into a social fund for Medicare and | social security. It's not tax revenue it's our savings. | Vt71fcAqt7 wrote: | Is that what they told you? You don't "pay into" social | security, you _pay for_ other old people's current social | security. And you certainly do not "pay into" Medicare. | Also the "social fund" of Medicare and social security | certainly benefit "the little guy" more than anyone else, | which was the whole point I was making. Also, who is | "we?" Some people would rather have that cash for | themselves or invest it on their own. And technically all | taxes can be called a "social fund" so I don't see hiw | this point even begins. If you go to jail for not paying | into a "social fund" it's tax revenue. | kneebonian wrote: | It wasnt't supposed to be tax revenue. Doesn't mean they | didn't treat it that way anyway. | primroot wrote: | "Civil government, so far as it is instituted for the | security of property, is in reality instituted for the | defence of the rich against the poor, or of those who have | some property against those who have none at all." - Adam | Smith | Vt71fcAqt7 wrote: | We're not talking about security of property here but about | who benefits from government spending. | candiodari wrote: | > but about who benefits from government spending | | Elon Musk? And, if you count foregoing taxes as spending, | Jeff Bezos? | cies wrote: | joxel wrote: | At least the anti-democracy party didn't name themselves | after democracy. That would've been an even worse joke. | aliqot wrote: | hey guys save this convo for reddit please. we're better | than this. | cies wrote: | the point im trying to make is they both hopelessly anti- | democracy. | | they all love lobbying (= anti-democracy to me: the | deeper pockets have more influence) there in washington | joxel wrote: | Like most things, anti-democratic activity is a spectrum | rather than black or white. It seems fairly obvious to me | that there is a large gulf between the two parties on | that spectrum. | cies wrote: | > It seems fairly obvious to me that there is a large | gulf between the two parties on that spectrum. | | Disagree from a distance (non-US'er). They both have | their VERY undemocratic behaviors: just one is the name | sake :) | Vt71fcAqt7 wrote: | It also doesn't help that true democracy isn't something | people actualy want. So democracy has basically been | redefined to mean a republic that makes decisions that | benefit or are demanded by the most people. | cies wrote: | > It also doesn't help that true democracy isn't | something people actualy want. | | Source? | | > So democracy has basically been redefined to mean a | republic that makes decisions that benefit or are | demanded by the most people. | | I claim that with lobby being allowed, democracy is a | facade to hide plutocracy's ugly face. | | "a republic that makes decisions that benefit or are | demanded by the rich/companies that can afford lobbying" | is what I think the word democracy currently hides. | 1letterunixname wrote: | Visit any courtroom in America. It's poor people who commit | small crimes who end up in prison. Wall St. fat cats who push | opiates on the masses get away with murder and get a slap on | the wrist. | codedokode wrote: | Don't you think that the punishments are too severe? Severe | punishments should be for violent crimes, not for stealing | several thousands dollars from authors. | 35amxn35 wrote: | Yeah extradition treaties and bowing down to the US or the | Interpol are how the One World Government begins. Mix that with | cheap massive surveillance tech imported from China and every | country going cashless and we're in FOR A RIDE. | rglover wrote: | You might even say it's Biblical. | trabant00 wrote: | Z-library was not about freeing books, they where pirating for | profit. The free account was limited in downloads and they had 2 | tiers of premium accounts, don't remember the sums or details. | They where profiting on the works of others too, they did not rip | the books themselves or anything like that. | 411111111111111 wrote: | The free tier was something like 5 books per day and was | throttled by ip. How many books do you usually read _per day_ | that this argument holds any kind of meaning? | | They throttled it, sure ... but that wasn't really a rate in | which you'd run into unless you're just downloading everything. | Which you still could just by cycling your ip. | | You also didn't need an account unless you wanted to send the | book directly to your Kindle. You're all around just | misinformed on the topic | ezconnect wrote: | Free tier is 10 books per day. They really have a nice search | and related books view making discovery easy. Lot of people | will miss z library. | madars wrote: | Docket: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/65760207/united- | states-... | revskill wrote: | First time heard about Z-library. The home page design seems like | a scam page though. | slbtty wrote: | It is a gate to the great knowledge. | lakomen wrote: | 1st time I heard about it. I'll try to find the tor site. | dredmorbius wrote: | An alternative is Library Genesis. | auggierose wrote: | What I was always wondering about, given they are clearly | illegal, why did they bother adhering to book take down requests | (and pointing out you could still access the book in question via | Tor...)? Was there some jurisdiction out there where that made | them legal? | ddevault wrote: | Man, fuck this. | hknmtt wrote: | "The pair was arrested on November 3, 2022 in Cordoba, Argentina | at the request of the United States" ... | jiveturkey wrote: | Does anyone know if when FBI/DOJ seizes domain names, do they | only do so when an arrest is imminent? It's quite obvious in this | case that it was allowed to remain operational while they were | investigating. I wonder if that's the general MO for domain | seizures. Because there are just tons of domains that should be | seized that are still operating. Why don't those get taken down? | No way FBI/etc aren't aware of these. | elashri wrote: | > As alleged, the defendants profited illegally off work they | stole | | How did they profit? If they even admitted that | | > Defendants Operated Z-Library, Which Offered Free Download of | Copyrighted Works | | This is a complete nonsense | jerojero wrote: | Maybe ads on the platfom? I'm not sure because 1. i use libgen | 2. i run adblock. | | But it wouldn't be surprising that such a popular platform | would have ads. Z-library was a site for pirated e-books, no? | fragmede wrote: | shh! do you want lingren to get taken down as well? whether | accurately or not, the takedowns is attribute to a sudden | burst of popularity due to social media sharing of the site. | jerojero wrote: | Z-library was popular amongst everyone, hackernews is a | really niche website. But I believe with that website going | down people will start looking for alternatives. | | If everything fails, we can always go back to download | books through IRC. | gnrlst wrote: | I believe they also offered premium plans and for the longest | time had a big banner on their site saying something like: "if | you know of high risk payment processors, please reach out" | luckylion wrote: | Their system was set up to make money, much like iptorrents. | Yes, you can use them for free, but they create very low | artificial limits to funnel you into paying for premium | services. | | Your outrage is misplaced, these are not the pirates freeing | books, these are parasites making money off of the pirates' | work. | fragmede wrote: | downloads were limited to a small number per day. if you wanted | to download more there was a small fee ($1?). They tracked her | Amazon account which had made $14k in purchases over the years. | dmw_ng wrote: | Curious where you heard the detail about Amazon | fragmede wrote: | The original arrest warrant. | | > Since March 20, 2019, the 1502 Account has placed more | than 110 orders totaling over $13,628.32, | | https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nyed.4 | 8... | 0xR1CK wrote: | They accepted payment to get around quotas (and probably ran | ads). Even if it was a tiny percentage of people who engaged | with them this way, or even if they profited at all, they took | money in exchange for accessing an illicit resource. That is | likely the main reason the teeth have come out to bite. | | If anything though this might push that resource to the hands | of people who can maintaining the massive library voluntarily | and distributed with less ethical/morally-dubious implications. | andai wrote: | Anyone know what payment processor they used? Did they take | USD etc? That's probably how their real identities got | exposed. | crtasm wrote: | I don't believe they ran adverts, can anyone confirm? | stevespang wrote: | prirun wrote: | A friend recently gave me a printed copy of Legend of Drizzt. It | was about 2 inches thick (3 books in 1), the printing was too | small for my crappy eyes, lighting in my room at night is not | great, and the printing went too close to the interior edge, all | making it hard to read. So I bought a Kindle. | | The Kindle worked much better. I got the Kindle Unlimited | subscription at no extra cost for 3 months (then $10/mo | afterwards), thinking I'd get access to any books on Amazon that | were available in the Kindle format. You know, "Unlimited". | Wrong! Kindle Unlimited means "whatever Kindle books Amazon wants | to give you", not "Unlimited". They need to rename that to | "Kindle Limited", "Kindle Picks", or whatever. Of course, this | series was not part of KU. | | I bought the first few books in the series, even though I already | had the printed book, at $8/book, which is kinda pricey | considering there are 36 books in the series, so it was going to | cost ~$300 to read the whole thing. Then I found out I could | download the books from the public library system. It's actually | a pretty good model I think, because at least in Indiana, all of | the public libraries are in a state-wide consortium, so there are | about 5 copies of each book in the series available to "rent" for | anyone in Indiana. And it's free. | | The e-book business model of $8/book makes no sense to me, at | least not for fiction. I don't want 36 already-read e-books | sitting on my Kindle - it just junks things up. What I _would_ | like is to be able to take a photo of a book I already have, | including the ISBN number, and get an electronic copy in my | Kindle library for free. That would be so awesome, esp | considering that as I get older, reading from a Kindle is way | easier than dealing with a physical book. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-11-17 23:00 UTC)