[HN Gopher] Elizabeth Holmes is sentenced to more than 11 years ... ___________________________________________________________________ Elizabeth Holmes is sentenced to more than 11 years for fraud Author : doener Score : 169 points Date : 2022-11-18 22:22 UTC (37 minutes ago) (HTM) web link (www.nytimes.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.nytimes.com) | [deleted] | peter422 wrote: | "Judge Edward J. Davila ... sentenced Ms. Holmes to 135 months in | prison, which is slightly more than 11 years. Ms. Holmes, 38, who | plans to appeal the verdict, must report to prison on April 27, | 2023. | | Federal sentencing guidelines for wire fraud of the size that Ms. | Holmes was convicted of recommend 20 years in prison. Ms. | Holmes's lawyers had asked for 18 months of house arrest, while | prosecutors sought 15 years and $804 million in restitution for | 29 investors." | nimbius wrote: | holy cats. the only thing that might send you away longer is | tax fraud and thats only because the us tax code was never | demilitarized after we crushed the mafia. 18 months was _never_ | going to happen. | vitaflo wrote: | Is it normal for there to be a sentencing and then be free for | 5 months before going to prison? I always assumed after a | sentencing you went straight to prison. What's the rationale | for waiting? To listen to appeals? | Swenrekcah wrote: | Probably two ways. First, for people to get their affairs in | order. For example you don't need a lease or can sell or rent | out your house or something. | | Second, for the prison facility to make sure there's a free | space for the incoming person. | | Edit: Someone pointed out she's pregnant, so there's that... | jquery wrote: | Yeah, can someone explain this? Meanwhile if you're poor and | can't afford bail you might spend 3 years in jail awaiting | trial: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalief_Browder | Phlarp wrote: | For rich and connected people convicted of white collar | crimes it's very common. It's also common for upper class | criminals to arrange the terms of their own work release-- | where they are employed by a company they own and are free | 12+ hours a day, only returning to custody to sleep. (Epstein | did this with his first conviction) | | For the rest of the population without money, power or | connections accused of drug crimes or petty theft it's | typical that you will be arrested and placed in jail | immediately and will be in custody until you are convicted / | sentenced at which point you will go directly to prison. | tarunupaday wrote: | in US - and specially for federal crimes - its very routine | for the courts to give some time for the person to report to | prison. | | This allows the person sentenced to get their affairs in | order. | | I know somebody who is sentenced for 10 years. The court gave | him 2 months which actually is not enough for all the items | he need to wrap up. To give an idea, this person needs to: | | - sell his house (who will pay the mortgage now that he is in | prison) - sell his car - donate / get rid of his clothes and | most of his belongings (or leave them in care of family / | storage) - cancel all the subscriptions and utilities - take | care of any medical needs - inform all the people who might | reach out to him so they can communicate with him - more... | | On the correction system side, they also need time to figure | out where to send this person and create the space there: - | If the person sentenced has any medical needs they will ask | for a "medical" facility (connected to a hospital) and | usually nicer. - the person sentenced might request a | correction facility that is closer to his loved ones (the guy | I know requested and going to a facility in Texas even though | he lives in Florida as his closest relative is his sister who | lives near that facility) - other factors include doing tests | / analysis to figure out should the person go to level 1 | security (minimum) or something higher; is the person | considered a risk to other inmates? are other inmates | considered a risk to this person (common for cops, sexual | offenders etc) | | Of course, if the person is considered a flight risk or | violence risk - they will just send him/her to the nearest | county jail and then figure out the rest. | | Overall, a lot of logistics and consideration is given to an | inmate - specially in a federal system. | dannykwells wrote: | Elizabeth is expecting and will give birth in early 2023. | This is a mercy for the judge to allow her to not give birth | in prison. | notch656a wrote: | Or the judge trolling so that she'll pop out the kid and | have some days to bond, and as soon as life feels somewhat | normal and together the kid will be ripped away and she'll | be tossed in a place full of gnashing of teeth and | suffering. | fbdab103 wrote: | >April 27, 2023 | | ~Five months from now seems long. Is that a common delta | between sentencing and prison? | loeg wrote: | See sibling reply: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33663715 | FiberBundle wrote: | Imagine how completely devoid of empathy you have to be to get | pregnant twice, knowing that your children have an extremely high | risk of growing up without their mother, just because you think | that this will improve your chances of getting a lighter | sentence. Absolutely despicable. She deserves every day she | spends in prison. | chairhairair wrote: | I agree that there should be repercussions for the damage she | caused, but the whiplash of this comment is pretty funny. | | I'm not sure how advocating for another person to enter the US | prison system demonstrates any sort of empathy. | AustinDev wrote: | This to me is the saddest part of the saga. It's obviously | awful what she did to the patients but, seeing a mother do this | to her own child somehow just hits different. | HWR_14 wrote: | I thought her thinking was "I will be unable to have a child | when I get out of prison". Which makes some sense. Preventing | my someone from procreating seems like a serious punishment not | warranted in this case. | lesuorac wrote: | They don't yet cyrofreeze convicts, you can get pregnant | while in prison although I suspect you must be on work-detail | or some other revenue generating activity for the prison to | approve your visitations. | dang wrote: | Ok, but please don't fulminate on HN. | | Perhaps you don't owe convicted fraudster mothers better, but | you owe this community better if you're participating in it. | | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html | [deleted] | Waterluvian wrote: | So that's what... 9.5 years minimum? | | I can't picture someone with such an inflated sense of self-worth | finding that to be acceptable. How's she not making this worse | for herself by trying to flee or something? | vkou wrote: | I doubt her passport still works, and I likewise doubt that she | still has (or ever had) the right friends to disappear without | one. | Waterluvian wrote: | Hmmmm yeah I guess she was never actually part of the elite | billionaire club of people with seemingly limitless power. | googlryas wrote: | 24 months and then "house arrest" | deathgripsss wrote: | If it's a federal sentence I don't think they will be that | lenient | Waterluvian wrote: | It's federal. So an absolute minimum of 85% of the sentence. | dang wrote: | All: we had a flurry of threads about this all at once, which | isn't surprising, but the comments they got were almost all bad | (for HN)--cheap and reflexive rather than thoughtful and | reflective. We want the latter, not the former*, so please take a | moment to reflect before commenting, and if you'd make sure | you're up on https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html | we'd appreciate that too. | | * https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&sor... | AustinDev wrote: | Do any of the patients she defrauded have civil suits against her | / Thernos? | Qtips87 wrote: | This creepy little thing should be locked up for life. | metadat wrote: | https://archive.today/00Uhs | jasonhansel wrote: | Interesting to compare this with the ongoing FTX disaster. | | I think these two cases are sort of parallels: people assumed | that someone was a genius to such an extent that they disregarded | any signs of fraud and sought little proof of the assertions | being made. | munk-a wrote: | If we're talking about financial damage done this sentencing | still feels exceedingly light. We have a real double standard - | there are people in jail for longer for possession. | | Edit to clarify: My statement is more intended to emphasize how | overly punishing possession charges rather than to advocate for | draconian charges for all offenses. | z9znz wrote: | The possession charges are part of a concerted effort beginning | in the 1980s "war on drugs" to provide reliable income for the | budding private prison industry. It was a hugely successful | campaign that has done irreperable damage to the US at the | individual level as well as the broad public/financial level. | | Poor people cannot afford to defend themselves, so they make | easy targets for incarceration. | | Wealthy or connected people take much more time and effort to | imprison, so the risk vs reward for prosecutors is just not | worth it in most cases. You have to _really_ piss off or | embarrass a lot of powerful people to get taken down like this | current case. | gruez wrote: | >The possession charges are part of a concerted effort | beginning in the 1980s "war on drugs" to provide reliable | income for the budding private prison industry. | | Source? I checked wikipedia and it suggests that it was the | other way around. The article on war on drugs also doesn't | show much developments around the 80s. Most of the changes | were in the 70s. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_prison#Development_2 | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_on_drugs#20th_century | wilsonnb3 wrote: | Seems excessive to me. I don't really care about people conning | rich people into parting with their money, especially when they | don't bother to do basic due diligence before hand. | Natsu wrote: | > If we're talking about financial damage done this sentencing | still feels exceedingly light. | | They gave her a sentence that's a little below the federal | sentencing guidelines but not by a huge amount. | tptacek wrote: | A federal 10 year sentence is a very severe punishment. There's | virtually no parole federally; once you're in, you're in. | WalterBright wrote: | 11 years is a heavy sentence. The sentences for possession are | what are wrong. | munk-a wrote: | Between you and the very similar sibling comment from | micromacrofoot I've edited my original statement. I | completely agree with what you both are saying and wanted to | clarify that I was highlighting the contrast between these | sentences not advocating for draconian prison sentences for | everyone. | micromacrofoot wrote: | This is the right sentiment, but maybe a little backwards, | people shouldn't be in jail for possession. | partiallypro wrote: | People do not serve that long of sentences for mere possession. | That's an exaggeration. I want legalization, but for mere | possession you do not get that type of sentence. If someone is | serving that for possession, it's one of many charges or | possession of a very large amount (into the pounds.) | heliodor wrote: | And there are people in prison doing less time for murder. | | We fail to reflect that 11 years in prison is a really long and | miserable time. | tptacek wrote: | Virtually all of them are convicted in state courts and under | state sentencing systems. Most states have mandatory minimums | for 1st degree murder, and those minimums are much higher | than Holmes' sentence; second-degree murder usually admits a | huge range of sentences, which captures the variety of | circumstances that might attend an unplanned killing. | dheera wrote: | zzleeper wrote: | You know, they could easily go after both groups no? | | We often feel we are in a XOR situation, but it's often | easier for the govt to try to consistently enforce rules | independently of the faces attached to the accused. | asveikau wrote: | I think Holmes did actual damage that equals or surpasses | some of these violent acts you enumerate. Medical tests that | don't work is a serious crime. There are serious consequences | to, say, an HIV test that doesn't work right. And she sold | that with full knowledge that it didn't work. | | Of course, she's being prosecuted for financial crimes and | not this... I guess they got Al Capone on taxes. | kilroy123 wrote: | I don't think this is light at all. 10 years in prison is no | joke. I actually thought she would only get 3-4 years. | Ndmmddnd wrote: | This is absolutely false | codex_irl wrote: | Out of curiosity, does anyone know what happened to all of the | Theranos hardware / technology after the company was shut down? | e.g. the edison testing machines | arthurcolle wrote: | What is the value of IP that doesn't work? Edison machine IP | seems about as useful as those time travel or perpetual motion | machine patents that come up. | etaioinshrdlu wrote: | I would very much like a Theranos Edison for my office, next | to a Juicero. | jen20 wrote: | I'd imagine those machines in particular would be useful as | museum pieces. | codex_irl wrote: | That is what I am thinking. | jliptzin wrote: | Collectibles...definitely a market there | duxup wrote: | They had nothing of value. | | They were often running tests on competitors machines. | | Their machine could not do what it promised with the amount of | blood it claimed to use and was no better than proven machines, | and arguably worse as they had lot of maintenance issues even | operating at their HQ. | | They had nothing of value. | doener wrote: | This user was faster: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33663191 | dang wrote: | The NYT article has the most information of the ones I've seen. | Edit: | https://twitter.com/scottbudman/status/1593729235818278912 also | (via https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33663152). | | When all else is equal, we favor the earliest submitter of a | story, but if one submission is more substantive than another | (as yours was in this case), then it should win. A substantive | article with more information has a better chance of forming a | good thread. | wilsonnb3 wrote: | I hope everyone learns their lesson from this - only lie to poor | people. | | Someday we will have to reckon with the fact that SV founder | culture encourages this kind of behaviour. | Qtips87 wrote: | In his sentencing statement, Judge Edward Davila said the case | was "troubling on so many levels." | | "What went wrong? This is sad because Ms. Holmes is brilliant." | | Brilliant of what? Of dressing in black turtleneck and imitating | Steve Jobs? Able to lower her voice one octave down? | xiphias2 wrote: | How much can she decrease it with good behaviour? (which she will | probably have, as I'm not expecting her to do anything bad | there). | | Maybe she gets out after 5 years, which is hopefully enough for | her to not start something similar again. | micromacrofoot wrote: | I feel really bad for her children, I can't believe she had the | gall to have them given this inevitability. | | I'm also of the mind that people shouldn't go to prison for non- | violent crime (some extreme form of probation seems more | effective to me), but that's an entirely different story. | trentnix wrote: | She had children specifically hoping it would help her avoid | harsh punishment. She's a manipulative sociopath...having | children was more of the same. | prepend wrote: | I find it odd that she found love and married. It seems like a | pretty big negative that someone would have to get over to meet | and love someone who defrauded billions of dollars. | tacker2000 wrote: | Good. | | She was a fraud and misled everyone in a big way: investors, | patients, etc... | | White collar crime needs to be punished. Or "held accountable | for" | mothsonasloth wrote: | This is not the first and won't be the last case of its kind. | | The interesting thing politically is if this will be enforced or | not, as I am sure there are a lot of Silicon valley founders | worrying now. At best they will get some deserved extra scrutiny, | at worse will be getting investigated. | | I've seen talk about Holmes' political connections, but she | surely is too toxic for them to get her a "free pass". She might | get relief from somewhere else though? | jeffbee wrote: | Why would anyone be "worried about this" unless they, too, were | running a big scam? Theranos did not fail it was just crime | from start to finish. | kkielhofner wrote: | You know what REALLY bothers me about this? | | She (possibly) gets pregnant during the first trial to garner | sympathy. Even if you have a charitable interpretation of this | only the worst of the worst narcissistic sociopaths decide to | "start a family" when they're potentially facing 15 years in | Federal Prison. She's currently pregnant with her second child. | | Now those kids get to grown up without a mother and live the rest | of their lives with the knowledge or at least suspicion they're | in this world because their con-artist mother was trying to | manipulate the justice system. | | Even IF you take the approach that she thought big and failed, | doing no real wrong the situation with her pregnancies (in my | mind) isn't up for debate. On this issue alone I find her | completely reprehensible. | jliptzin wrote: | It is terrible if that was the reason, but as for the kids, | plenty of kids grow up with one parent or raised by | grandparents, aunts/uncles, or adoptive parents. | bigmattystyles wrote: | Or she's 38 and her fertility window is closing. I'll hold many | things against her, she deserves prison time, but I won't hold | having a child against her or judge her for it. She may be | doing it for the reasons you mentioned, but so many women go to | prison with far fewer resources to care for their children | while they're in. I doubt she thought any seasoned judge would | take it into consideration. | loeg wrote: | And she will be out before she's 50 and be able to have some | relationship with her kids. I agree with you (and not the | grandparent comment) -- I can't hold this against her. | macrolime wrote: | She's too old to have kids once she's out though. It's now or | never for her. | tptacek wrote: | In a previous thread, I had this at "more than 10 years, less | than 60" (yeah, that's an easy bet to make!). The core driver of | the sentence is probably the guidelines 2B1.1 table, which scales | sentencing levels by economic losses. She was convicted for | something like $140MM in fraudulent losses, which by themselves | ask for a 24-level escalation (the table maxes out in the | mid-40s). | | By the numbers, the court was probably quite lenient here. Not to | say that's an unjust outcome; the "lenient" option for sentencing | on serious federal felonies is still quite harsh. | | _Edit_ | | I tracked down the prosecutor's sentencing memorandum; they asked | for 15 years. So I guess maybe not that lenient. | ryoshu wrote: | FTX is over $1 billion and the table maxes out at $550 million, | so that should be fun. Lawmakers should revisit that. | tptacek wrote: | That's true, and it does mean that once you hit $550MM, you | might as well keep going, but on the flip side, the full | sentence accelerator for 2b1.1 at $550MM gets you above 20 | years by itself. | partiallypro wrote: | I think her being pregnant and having a child definitely made | the sentence a little lighter than if she were otherwise. I do | wonder if she'll even serve the full sentence. | tptacek wrote: | She will serve the full sentence. There is no federal parole. | metadat wrote: | No reductions for good behavior etc? I didn't know this.. | or I'd forgotten. Thank you. | e40 wrote: | That recent picture of her looks like she is pregnant. Is that | the case? What a way to start an 11 year sentence. | ProAm wrote: | tbf I think after 11 years she would be outside of the safe age | range to have a baby in America, so now or never type of | scenario. | 300bps wrote: | She's about 6 months pregnant now and the sentence won't begin | until April 27, 2023. | tanseydavid wrote: | You are correct. | inerte wrote: | I heard on NPR that yes, she is. | ceejayoz wrote: | She had a child while the case was pending, and is pregnant | again. | | Hell of a thing to do to a kid. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-11-18 23:00 UTC)