[HN Gopher] Habits of Highly Overrated People (2013) ___________________________________________________________________ Habits of Highly Overrated People (2013) Author : Tomte Score : 97 points Date : 2022-11-26 20:14 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (daedtech.com) (TXT) w3m dump (daedtech.com) | doctor_eval wrote: | You've pretty much described the narcissist who headed a company | I worked for a while ago. | | Example real life interaction: | | Me: please can we defer this non critical meeting until after | product launches in a few weeks as my team is super busy and we | are about to sign a customer. | | Them: Non critical meeting is important for team building, which | is more important than product, and must therefore go ahead. | | Me: ?????? | | It was nice to read this article and finally have a place to put | all my WTFs. | neilv wrote: | Some of the symptoms the article gave are painful to read, | because that can also be what it looks like when a person is | blocked outside of their control (e.g., another team not | delivering, or up the chain has a problem), and trying to fix it. | | Before trying to assign individual blame to a part, try to debug | the actual system problems in team and organization. | pojzon wrote: | When I spot ppl like that driving the company towards bottom I | know its time to jump the ship. | | Over 10 years of work, jumped few times like that. | | Each and every time the company went to bin. | | Following those kind of ppl does not work, having too many of the | also. | | But its very hard to push them out once they made "connections" | and "politics" going. | genghisjahn wrote: | These articles come out with some regularity, and yet no one ever | says, "Yep! That's totally me! I'm a non contributing zero but | I've made a living at making others think I add to the team!" | Everyone knows people like this, but no one is one. | davesque wrote: | I think the reality is that anyone might engage in these | behaviors from time to time. I've seen myself doing some of | these things in my weaker moments and I've seen others doing | them. And I've seen those same people turn around and | contribute positively on other days. Of course no one is going | to categorize themselves as highly overrated. Maybe that's | because people often don't reliably fit into specific | categories. | oxfordmale wrote: | There is a fine line between being highly overrated or just | being successful at selling your achievements. I suspect a lot | of people start out successfully selling their genuine | achievements, but over time realise they can just do the | selling. | q-big wrote: | First: there is of course an incentive not to admit this. | | Second: I do believe that many people on HN really deeply care | about technology/hacking topics and have detest for office | politics. On the other hand, the people that the article | discuss are good at office politics/marketing themselves and | often don't have such a deep knowledge about programming. Thus, | I would indeed assume that the typical HN reader/writer less | likely fits into the "highly overrated people" pattern of the | article. | paulcole wrote: | The average HN reader is highly overrated for other reasons. | | > have detest for office politics | | The problem is that many people on HN believe any interaction | with someone with an MBA, marketing background, manager, etc. | is "office politics." | serverholic wrote: | Yes because if you look at it objectively those people tend | to be lying, manipulative people with big fake smiles on | their faces. | | People are so accustomed to our messed up society that they | don't even realize how amoral "normal" behavior is. | q-big wrote: | > The average HN reader is highly overrated for other | reasons. | | Possibly ... ;-) | jpmoral wrote: | I think the problem is that people think that all office | politics is necessarily bad. | GoOnThenDoTell wrote: | Any interaction with another human at work is politics | paulcole wrote: | Yes, but derisively referring any interaction with | another human at work as "office politics" is the | problem. | serverholic wrote: | It can turn into office politics fast. Maybe you say the | wrong thing and now you and your coworker have an awkward | tension. | | IMO it's almost never worth trying to make friends with | your coworkers. Be nice, be helpful, and do a good job | but keep your friends and work life separate. | mrtksn wrote: | I actually don't like that kind of articles at all precisely | because I tend to find things from myself and the authors often | do very bad job in analysing these behaviours because the | articles are one sided "hit pieces" that essentially promote a | narrative or a worldview. | | All the same behaviours can be written in a self improvement | post on LinkedIn or something or a successful person might try | to explain the success to these behaviours. In its core its all | the same, broken mental models trying to explain things people | don't understand. | | IMHO all these behaviour have different roots and dynamics and | plays little role in the actual results(being successful or | overrated). | yarg wrote: | I think a lot of these people are on the 'spectrum' of | sociopathy. | | At very least they're superficially charming bullshitters. | | Either way, they're not the sort of people to call themselves | out - even when they're fully aware of what they're doing. | cplusplusfellow wrote: | They make up a really small percentage of the population and | that group generally isn't reading articles and introspecting. | mberning wrote: | What is the likelihood that one of these people is on such a | site as this? They are avoiding work after all. Not trying to | get better at it. | NikolaNovak wrote: | Hacker News is BRILLIANT for avoiding work :-) | mberning wrote: | Fair point. Although in my experience the most useless | people at work usually spend working hours jacking around | with their plex server, daytrading crypto, etc. | drbeast wrote: | Well, that's actually me. I do a lot of stuff on this list. No | shame, I'm in upper management. | theknocker wrote: | LazyCroHacker wrote: | Yo. | | Ask me anything. | | Edit : I'm actually serious. I don't do most of the things in | the article, or at least definitely not with the intent and | detail - but I've been moved over time from being a pretty good | and certainly respected hands on techie, to a middle to upper | manager with massive imposter syndrome. Client loves me. My | boss loves me. My team loves me. But I myself definitely | struggle to always understand my value and I definitely spend | many hours each week fine tuning PowerPoint slides, reporting, | over communicating, team building etc - which again, seems to | make everybody happy and impressed. Maybe my hidden talent is | communicating between techies and business? Possibly there's | real value in my role - but DEFINITELY not according to any | hacker news colleagues. So - AMA :) | nonrandomstring wrote: | The acceptance of others in our team called "society", who | assume as a matter of human dignity that we each "add" | something, is how we all get by and live. We're all nice | people, terrified of growing old and alone, being left out out | in the cold and hungry. We're all part of the same team, under | the same shit system that makes us feel safer by devaluing | others. | levelforge wrote: | This is so frustratingly true... I've seen this play out over and | over... often these people are mistakenly promoted and eventually | they sink the ship. | mberning wrote: | Man the slackware clock thing is so common. "Is that in | confluence?" burns me up regularly. Things like how to delete a | file in git. Or revert a file. As the number of tools required to | build software continues to grow there are more and more | opportunities for people to play dumb and act dopey. | renewiltord wrote: | I don't see how that can work. If someone does that even once | you're going to lose respect for them. Twice and you're going | to fire them for just not being smart enough. | safaa2000 wrote: | Minutia is the definitely the bikeshedding holy grail of business | theater. | brazzy wrote: | That's because getting lost in minutiae happens to nearly | everyone, even most people who are competent and hard-working. | _Avoiding_ it is a skill not many are very good at. | enkid wrote: | The problem is there are times when minutiae is important. | The skill is knowing when it is important and when it isn't. | paulpauper wrote: | Reminds me of crypto. Overhyped and underdelivers. | revskill wrote: | Why that is the matter ? | | The problem is in bad project management, technical leading and | outcome management instead. | | Solve those issues first, and there will be no overrated people. | tyroh wrote: | This is precisely what's happened in our company. The project | management head was not a servant leader and actively avoided | doing real work while telling others what to do and promising | to do things that never happened. Sadly, this person is still | with our company at the time of this writing, but thankfully | not anymore in a role where they can derail work. | | What really struck a nerve in me was that I had to catch all | the work this person wasn't doing, and I only realized it after | I got burned out from all the extra work. | | The bigger issue then is that you can't solve this because | often, the person does a good job of hiding the bigger issue by | deflecting to smaller, more pressing ones. | jiggawatts wrote: | JustLurking2022 wrote: | I might believe that to some extent except that not all | development jobs lend themselves equally to cranking out | commits. Sure, if you're working on a well defined feature with | all dependencies already built, you can really crank stuff out. | However, those also tend to be the easiest jobs filled by | junior developers. Solving the less well understood/defined | problems often generated fewer commits per day but often | generates more value. | RC_ITR wrote: | I get the strong impression that you've never led a multi- | billion dollar organization. | | Don't show me the random code you built that makes a users like | history load 500 milliseconds faster, talk to me about how to | make the product better/more engaging/monetized! | q-big wrote: | > Don't show me the random code you built that makes a users | like history load 500 milliseconds faster, talk to me about | how to make the product better/more engaging/monetized! | | Honestly, if I were the CEO, I would ask for the former if I | were looking for the good programmers to keep since these are | the things that make the technological base of the company | run. | | The answer is of course likely different if I were looking | for the _managers_ to keep ... | [deleted] | furyofantares wrote: | In the environments I've been in, it feels like all of these | things would set off everybody's BS detectors extremely quickly | draw_down wrote: | 300bps wrote: | Found myself simultaneously laughing and being horrified by | identifying techniques used by people I've worked with. | | The advice at the end is spot on. | | _It also turned out that the best way to appear generous was | actually to be generous since false displays of generosity were | usually discovered and resulted in ostracism_ | | I'll help anyone out at work. I'll teach anyone anything I know. | I will never throw someone else under the bus. I'll take credit | with "we" and blame with "I". | | I've been rewarded for this behavior at the places I've worked | at. | qsort wrote: | The best mix is a lot of genuine collaboration with a tiny bit | of backstabbing occasionally thrown in. | | Be genuinely useful, cooperative and valuable, that's a given. | It speaks for itself, it's rewarding to you personally, and | it's the only way to do not burn out. | | But don't be afraid to play hardball. Don't cover for | incompetence. Don't be taken advantage of. Don't be a sucker. | | The simple wisdom of tit-for-tat is what I recommend. | gpderetta wrote: | FWIW, have had the same experience. | tomger wrote: | Same. Long term vs short term. | ilikeitdark wrote: | Elon Musk | LAC-Tech wrote: | Fires most of the work force and the site is more pleasant than | it was in 2020? | | Sounds like the opposite of Elon Musk. | croes wrote: | More fake check marks, totally pleasant. | k8t wrote: | He's the CEO and a huge voting share owner of his companies, | why would he need to pretend to be working? Also, it's probably | hard to make breakthroughs in space travel and electric | vehicles doing fake work. | | There's been a huge amount of leaks, rumors, and reports about | Elon from within and from without his companies. He's been | accused of a lot of things, but fake working has not been one | of them. | croes wrote: | The breakthroughs were done by his employees not Musk or do | you praise Pope Julius II. for the Sistine chapel ceiling? | | BTW were is the breakthrough in Teslas? | musingsole wrote: | > BTW were is the breakthrough in Teslas | | You're either uninformed or being pointedly obtuse. Tesla | has a massive patent portfolio -- starting with the | roadster's gearless transmission. | | It's a point of fact that building a massive car company | within a crystallized industry was a breakthrough in its | own right. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-11-26 23:00 UTC)