[HN Gopher] I don't want to be an internet person ___________________________________________________________________ I don't want to be an internet person Author : chippy Score : 360 points Date : 2022-12-07 10:22 UTC (12 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.palladiummag.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.palladiummag.com) | d_sem wrote: | Other commenters have already articulated how internet | subcultures are comparable to other historical examples social | subcultures. I think the first order bit is to ask the question | if being an internet person produces a imminent threat to human | civilization. Personally I perceive physical decay in our well | being, happiness, and an overall reduction in the quality of | live. I often am reminded how people use to spend their time in | the physical space and wonder if we just spent 5% of the time on | the internet supporting our local communities we would have a | objectively better human experience. It's not that I perceive the | internet inherently bad. However, as a tool for psychological | distraction, it is incredibly effective and often used against | our personal best interests. | fleddr wrote: | A great way to test the difference between the online and offline | world is to boast about something you accomplished in a family | gathering, say thanksgiving. | | "I scored 3 goals in last weekend's game". | | That's wonderful! (nobody truly cares, but it's still recognized | and celebrated.) | | "I got 40 likes on my last tweet" | | ??? | | "Wait, it gets better: 20 people watched me play a game. Had to | stay up until 4AM but still, worth it." | | ??? | | Truly, nobody gives a shit. It means so little that people will | not even pretend to recognize it. It's more like a negative | accomplishment that gets people worried that you have poor | judgement in life. | endorphine wrote: | Pretty sure the reactions you'll get in these occasions depend | wildly on the people you are with at the time. | [deleted] | Karrot_Kream wrote: | I have a few streamers and Twitter personalities in my friend | and family groups and so we do actually recognize these things. | I grew up with a more "traditional" low-brow blue-collar | upbringing and find it frustrating that my friends aren't | following more of the World Cup, basketball, American football, | etc etc. Funny how niches work right? | a1369209993 wrote: | > A great way to test the difference between the online and | offline world | | Nitpick: this is great way to test the _hypocrisy in how people | treat /view_ the online and offline world. It's not a inherent | difference between them. | xboxnolifes wrote: | Agree. This has nothing to do with online vs offline. The | distinction here works just as well between sharing two | offline events. Some people care about some things, but not | others, with seemingly no reason other than because some | things are more culturally accepted as being important. | xboxnolifes wrote: | This has nothing to do with online vs offline, it's entirely | down to what the audience values. | | "I kicked a ball against a wall 10 times in a row yesterday". | | Nobody cares. | GreenChairS33 wrote: | We have long since moved from notion that the internet is an opt | in tool. I fondly remember when Mac OS 9 would prompt you about | the internet on first boot and you could pick "my computer does | not connect to the internet". Looking at you Windows 11. | clnq wrote: | Looking at you, social fabric of society. | CommieBobDole wrote: | I don't really think this is a new or interesting phenomenon just | because it involves the internet; since the first subculture | existed, people have sought them out and/or molded them in order | to be a big fish in an incredibly tiny pond. This guy doesn't | represent "online" or "the internet" any more than Bob Smith, who | rules the entire North Boise Yu-Gi-Oh community (all seven | members of it) with an iron fist, represents the physical world | and human interaction in it. | | As other commenters have noted, the subject of the article is | apparently also a terrible person and possibly a psychopath. | Which again, runs true to type; he's found the largest possible | community where he capable of being enough of a Big Deal to abuse | people with impunity. Which, as it turns out, is pretty small and | esoteric. | bowsamic wrote: | This is possibly the most cyberpunk thing I've ever read | greenhearth wrote: | Jeez, really? Please read some Phillip K. Dick at least. | DrNosferatu wrote: | TL;DR: Sounds like the title of a Ramones song! | cxf12 wrote: | I now know that giving my 10 yo daughter a phone for Christmas 3 | years ago was a huge mistake for the exact reasons this article | sites. | jacooper wrote: | I was given unfiltered access to the internet at an early age, | yet I found my self avoiding almost every pitfall in it | | I still don't why or how to direct kids towards having this | "internal compass" to avoid weird or dangerous stuff. | Mezzie wrote: | I was also (I got online at the age of 4 in 1993) and I think | a lot of avoiding the pitfalls was being around adults in | real life who understood how the internet worked. Not just my | parents, but other adults as well. For example, I understood | very young that there was a lot of overlap between people I | talked to online and the awkward adult men I met at computer | shows. I also got to listen to my mom's complaints about | existing as a female geek in IRL geek spaces. It prevented me | from putting internet people on a pedestal. I always knew we | were all weirdos. | joemazerino wrote: | But when? The internet is much more dangerous now than it was | in the late 90s. | lilboiluvr69 wrote: | I'm not entirely sure I agree. I mean, maybe I do. I think | one could argue that the internet is a lot more moderated | in this day and age, but maybe you were referring more to | the addictive and destructive effects of social media. | | Do you care to elaborate? | clnq wrote: | Moderation seems to be best at getting rid of low-hanging | fruit. There is much less easily accessible gore, shock | and radical content online these days. But thanks to the | very large scope of the internet, there's plenty of more | insidious threats of the cultural (unsavory, doomer), | physiological (dopamine-bombing scroll media, attention- | grabbing content, personalized emotional manipulation by | ads), and societal (dating/friendships moving online, | echo-chambers, etc) nature. | | Probably like the author of the comment you are | responding to, I also grew up with the early pre-y2k | internet. As a kid, I've seen some extremely disturbing | thigns online that are burned into my memory until today. | And yet they do not have as much impact on my life today | as the terminally online society does. | | It's hard to exactly quantify how our lives would be | different if the internet never developed past it's 1990s | state. But I feel strongly that they would be very | different. Would my life be much different if I didn't | see one or two unsavory images as a kid online? Probably | not. Even when I was young, I had functional | mental/emotional boundaries for that. On the other hand, | as an adult, I still have to consciously stay away from | doomscrolling because I know my brain has never evolved | for that kind of abuse. | | To sum up, moderation doesn't seem to target threats | online that are actually dangerous. And they seem to have | impacted our society tremendously from my perspective. | cpif wrote: | I'm a bit perplexed by the title. The article distinguishes | between an early, anonymous, unregulated internet culture -- | which the NFT club seems to resemble -- and contemporary internet | people who "decided to make the internet boring." | | As cartoonish as it is, I buy that distinction. But usually, when | people make it, they're making a plea for the old internet. The | writer of this article, however, doesn't seem to be doing that. | The milady community feels, "a little bit, like that internet | from 1995"; it is unlike social media communities where you are | "constantly performing your personality" and "Liking is a | personal endorsement." Again, when people make that distinction, | they're usually writing against likes, personality, and "iPhone | photography of yourself." | | So regarding the title: does she not want to be _either_ type of | internet person? Or is "normie" social media engagement ok? | gabesullice wrote: | My understanding is that she feels like the pseudonymous | internet is a black hole from which we can't escape and we've | already passed the event horizon. | | - Some people don't know it yet. - Some people choose to | pretend it hasn't happened. - Some people, like her, wish that | it hadn't happened and are peering into the void, struggling to | come to terms with it. - And the people she's writing about | have realized it has happened and are running toward the | singularity. | | She feels that our culture is defined by those going the | fastest, long before the rest of society catches up to it. But | we'll all get there eventually, and the avant garde will be | further away from the unaware than ever before. | | I don't think she's making an argument about whether we should | fall in any particular bucket. She doesn't want to be in the | avant garde though. Maybe she's sad about that, because she | pictured herself as being an avant garde kind of person. | mahathu wrote: | This was an interesting article, but I also kinda wish I hadn't | read it. Knowing people like this exist just made me a little | sad. | imwillofficial wrote: | I went in not expecting much. I ended up enthralled. | | A fascinating article. | aliqot wrote: | I know of a few people who will be receiving this link as a gift | from me today :) | swader999 wrote: | Maybe they need help, encouragement and a true friend more than | this kind of "gift"? | throwayyy479087 wrote: | I really, really think that negative feedback needs to make a | comeback. Anything besides a hugbox counts as bullying now, | even when _people desperately need to change_. The people in | this article are horror shows who need introspection, not | encouragement. | missingrib wrote: | They're horror shows because...they're boring/awkward/spend | a lot of time online? I think you need a reality check. | swader999 wrote: | Well it's fair to debate the best way to bring about change | that I agree they need. I certainly don't mean to encourage | them to continue on this path. Everyone needs a kick in the | ass now and then but I would bet money that kind of | approach here would just push them further into their | shells. | [deleted] | the_only_law wrote: | They don't need shit from an HN user, that's for sure. | dinobones wrote: | What a boring article. Let people live how they want to live. | Just because you don't like their lifestyle/personality/way of | living doesn't mean you get to act like you're better than them. | rideontime wrote: | It's a boring article because it's about boring people, who try | to pretend they aren't boring. | [deleted] | accountforgot wrote: | >his orthopedic sneakers couldn't touch the floor... | | >his tiny frame perched a few feet away on an oversized leather | chair... | | >a crooked smile that reveals a row of nubby teeth | | >disappointing to meet the "worst person on the internet" and | find that they are _nothing at all_ | | I think the author has missed the point about why Charlie is the | way he is, why he has spent so much of his social life online, | she did apparently reveal how this Charlie is looked upon by | "normal" people in real life through no fault of his own. | fullshark wrote: | I can't escape the belief that the Internet is now a place for | junk food media consumption and fake (not IRL) friends. | throwawaaarrgh wrote: | then don't write an internet article | LAC-Tech wrote: | Never heard of the guy he's talking about, but started getting | strong "weirdo" vibes wrt the author after the third paragraph of | character assassination, largely based around this persons | appearance. | | For anyone who read all the way through - does it get anywhere | close to making a point or is it mostly about how ugly people the | author doesn't like are? | spongebobism wrote: | I stopped reading for the same reason. | [deleted] | blue039 wrote: | In the past being an "internet person" brought you into | interesting sub-cultures. You had shibboleths (like quoting | bash.org) that would identify you. Since the internet was small | you would meet genuine often interesting people. I still have | friends from the "wild west" days of the internet. The time | period, I think, was the absolute best time to be alive and on | the internet (though terminally online lamers and cry bullies | demanding censorship may disagree). | | Now, the apt term for people who are "too online" is "terminally | online". The terminally online are more like a cancer than an | interesting sub-culture. Since social media has allowed them to | gain some semblance of following in a hyper-niche subgroup they | think they can take their absurd opinions, styles, ideas, etc | into the real world and expect it to work. These people are | easily identified. When placed in an uncomfortable situation they | become cry bullies. You might know many of them as your current | HR department. | Apocryphon wrote: | Your description is very accurate, but I would suggest that | they are often the types to complain most fiercely about HR | departments in general, not specific organizations per se but | rather about the existence of HR as a social class that sets | cultural norms. Terminally online folks dwell on both sides of | the pro- and counter-establishment cultural divide. | brycewray wrote: | After reading this, I was reminded of the phrase "That way | madness lies." But I Am Old.(tm) | 2Gkashmiri wrote: | nice. here is my idea.... | | i was online from my pre teens time. i actually had to wait a | 'few' years to get my own email address. back then, there was no | "social media", no algorithm and you were taught to not give your | real "A/S/L" because people could track you down and hurt you and | all that. oh the days. | | i adopted this randomuser handle, not linking my accounts from | one service with another, not reusing handles, not having | google/FB/apple accounts, it takes time and energy. | | anonymity on the internet is a wonderful thing really. forget the | abusers and stuff, moderation is for that. when you consider the | real problem of doxing, you appreciate the benefits of using | anoymous handles. | | >Everyone knows, abstractly, that the internet is not real life. | But you can't picture it, not really, until you sit across from | the real people behind the screen. Even the darkest online | personalities are just people on their phones. It is oddly | disappointing to meet the "worst person on the internet" and find | that they are nothing at all. | | we call if "AFK" and not "IRL" | FeistySkink wrote: | How do you avoid being doxxed based on your writing style? | 2Gkashmiri wrote: | Wow. Interesting question. | | I don't have a second account so I checked stylometry and it | gave me bunch of names that I know are not me. Maybe I will | try with a new second account and confirm. | | Second, stylometry can dox me how? My current handle is not | attached to anywhere else on internet and even if someone did | HN/reddit/twitter stylometry analysis, how will that reach my | home and or identity of my passport? Its not like I post | anything online in my own name. Haven't in actual years. | | So assuming an adversary was trying to find me and did see my | reddit or active twitter account, so... What? Short of | breaking into it and checking the 2fa number (which I avoid | at all costs) how ? Maybe amazon but I don't write reviews so | ..... How would you go about this? | A4ET8a8uTh0 wrote: | << stylometry can dox me how? | | By themselves, none of the things we discuss are inherently | bad. They are just tools. I open with this, because it is | important to understand that stylometry by itself uncovers | only a small facet of your online persona, by possibly | identifying your footprint and allowing for ingestion and | analysis for OTHER identifying information. | | Using your example your passport may not be online, but | lets say you link self-hosted project, your website may be | registered to your company and, depending on how you set it | up, your information may be relatively trivial to run | against information broker database ( LX, TR ). | | It is surprisingly easy to slip even if you are privacy | conscious of it and it really only takes one time since | internet does remember ( and it is saved somewhere ). I | guess what I am saying is I would not dismiss it outright, | but at the very least I would check the link parent added; | it actually is kinda amazing. | causi wrote: | Someone could use my writing style to link my online | identities together. How does that help them doxx me when | there is nothing written under my real name? | throwaway32433 wrote: | https://stylometry.net/user?username=causi | | You don't need to give out your name and address to be | doxxed, there's enough information from your comments | across your accounts to reasonably identify you if someone | wanted. | | MIT did a study on 'anonymised' data and found out it only | took something like 2 data points to identify someone. | dbspin wrote: | Perhaps, but the site above doesn't seem particularly | effective. I have an alt for reasons of convenience I use | about equally regularly to my main. It's not even listed | on the set of likely candidates. Meanwhile I've five | spurious correlations above .6. | buildsjets wrote: | Stylometry does not identify any of my alternate | accounts. I ain't skeered. | costco wrote: | It might have if I had used an algorithm that wasn't the | easiest to implement on stylometry.net. Unless you are | varying your writing style across accounts a more | sophisticated algorithm could very likely figure out your | alts given enough comments. Which is not to say that you | should give up everything and stop posting on HN but just | something to consider depending on who your adversaries | are. | 2Gkashmiri wrote: | Yeah, my question too | pixl97 wrote: | See, here's the problem with the internet, you have to | assume your data is out there forever. You may have | fastidiously ensured that your personal information has | been posted as of today, but it doesn't matter, one mistake | tomorrow and the entire house of cards collapses. | | Lets say you borrow your dads computer to post and it's | logged in under his name. You log into a site with an | incognito browser and post a message in Chrome and then | close it out. | | Well due to a bug in that version of Chrome the full path | of user folder Chrome was in was added to the request logs | on the server 'C:\users\ronald.t.devito\appdata\\....'. | This gets put in the servers logs with your username. That | server had bad security and the logs leaked to everyone on | the internet. A hacker realizes that 'belli' is also use | 'causi', and a few other profiles. They see that username | is pretty unique to a 54 year old male from the west coast, | but the writing style is of a much younger, likely male, | person which points at Ronald's son Jonny. | | You are at risk of being disclosed/doxx on the internet | because of security issues everywhere in the stack and its | exceptionally difficult to cover all the bases. | sverona wrote: | That's at least two mistakes and a shocking number of | inferences which are all but impossible without prior | knowledge. | mnky9800n wrote: | I have a terminal application that i wrote that rewrites all | text that i plan to write to have a neutral tone. so i type | the comment, put it into the terminal application, it | rewrites the comment, and then i post that instead. | jacooper wrote: | Is it open source? | askiiart wrote: | How did you do that? GPT-3? | boppo1 wrote: | They made it up | eu wrote: | Do tell more, please. | mechanical_bear wrote: | Use different slang on different accounts. Don't bother with | capitalisation on some. Use British English on some. Etc. The | speaking style aligns with the username. | jzellis wrote: | The worst thing about these people isn't that they're shitty | edgelords spouting nonsensical gobbledygook about NFTs like | they've discovered fire. The worst thing about them is that | they're uniformly boring in every conceivable way. Great, some | submillennial has made his own version of ZooTV on a dying social | network. That must be terribly exciting if you've never seen any | media ever that came out before Gossip Girl. Yaaaaaawwwwwn. | zmxz wrote: | > they're uniformly boring in every conceivable way | | This is such concise and brutally accurate way to sum it up, I | salute you for this brilliant description. I could not agree | more, such a spot-on assertion! | kwyjibo1230 wrote: | Your comment sounds almost Seuss-like somehow. Partly that | description and assertion is a slant rhyme, but it also feels | like there's some kind of (un)intentional pentameter going on | notpachet wrote: | "I am the very model of a modern Major General!" | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXf0o2d-W5w | [deleted] | pdntspa wrote: | I'm just sick of seeing everyone have these obxious, stupid | "extra" personalities. Nobody can be calm or cool, nobody ever | wants to channel any kind of zen, everything has to have the | energy of an episode Pee-Wee's Playhouse. It's like we never | advanced past 3 years old. | H8crilA wrote: | FWIW it's a normal part of growing up (teenage angst). Looked | different but not really when I was younger. | | The key question is "so what?", for example "so what they all | have these fake personalities", which somehow takes years to | understand. | pdntspa wrote: | It's not the fake personalities that's so bothersome, it's | the energy level. I hated it then and I still hate it now. | People need to chill the fuck out. | georgeburdell wrote: | As a Millennial who spends a decent chunk of time on the | internet, but not on social media sites, your words are | incomprehensible to me and I'm not sure why. | clnq wrote: | Summary: | | It's bad enough that some people have anxious, provocative, | and attention seeking personality that comes out as fringe | tech elitism. Yet it's even worse that this is nothing new. | gwbas1c wrote: | I was very active in my local dial-up BBS scene in the mid-late | 1990s, when I was a teenager. I even ran a dial-up BBS. Outside | of school, I estimate that I probably spent more time online than | socializing with my friends IRL. (In real life.) | | BUT: I have much more vivid memories, and better bonds, with my | friends. This is partially because we spent a lot of time | together in school, and because we actually bonded. | | Although I had online friends, and I took the time to meet some | other BBS people IRL, I never developed any real bonds with them. | One of my very active BBS users attended the same college as me. | We met a few times, but never rekindled our online bond. | | This made me realize that my online bonds are more like a hobby | than a real lifelong friendship; much like at-work friendships | that fizzle out after a job change. | | Needless to say, a few years ago I generally dropped out of | Facebook; the hobby (Facebook) was getting in the way of my | relationships. The people I care about either don't post on | Facebook, or Facebook seems to make me angry at them. | Lammy wrote: | > As Miya's infamy grew, the proliferation of helpers--as well as | copycat accounts | | That's funny considering BPD_GOD already sounds like bootleg | CHOBITCOIN. There is nothing new under the sun (and here's why | that's a GOOD thing!!) | Apocryphon wrote: | It is rather reassuring to laugh at a devil for being a | knockoff imp rather than the great dragon. OLD!!!!!! | PixelForg wrote: | This article has been eye opening for me, I too spent a lot of my | time on the internet but thankfully never came across the deep | end. Made me realize that there's no point in keeping up with | memes and stuff and made me think about what actually matters | pixl97 wrote: | Eh, this article really touches on nothing new and if I | bothered I could find many others like in in the past X00 years | based on people that dive head first into things and make it | their lives. "I don't want to be 'religious fanatic group' | person" , "I don't want to be 'music trend people", ad | infinitum. It turns out that people that tend to focus on one | subsection of culture are not well rounded and generally boring | superficial people. Nothing about this has to do with the | 'internet', it's just that HN is eating it up because the word | internet is in it and many of us have a strange magical | reverence to it. | [deleted] | buildsjets wrote: | "All my friends are online. Will people forget about me if I am | not on the internet?" | | Yes. But they really weren't your friends to begin with, so it | doesn't matter. | jacooper wrote: | I see this a lot, but is it actually true? | | Friendships are built on a shared interest / shared activities, | and frequent contact. | | When you stop using the communication medium your friends use, | then you just added friction to reach you, which stops frequent | contact. | | you slowly go from a friend to an old friend or a distant old | friend. | | There is a reason that when you move, its a lot harder to keep | up with your old neighbors. | nonameiguess wrote: | There's a difference between a real friend and someone you | have some affinity with and currently happen to share a | community of some sort. It's fairly common to meet a friend | while attending a particular elementary school, going to a | church, playing a sport, but when you finish school, stop | going to that church, stop playing the sport, you remain | friends. It's obviously common to lose touch with a bunch of | people and never talk to them again, either. Those were not | your true friends. | | Which raises an interesting question. Is it possible at all | to have a relationship that purely takes place on a web | platform that will continue after you leave the platform? | | "The" communication medium your friends use seemingly | shouldn't matter. A person you only interact with when there | is no friction involved isn't much of a friend. | clnq wrote: | Jack Shafer in their book "The Like Switch" says that there | are 4 elements in building a friendship: proximity, | intensity, frequency and duration of interaction. | | Similarly to work and school friends who are very proximal | and spend a bit of time with us, online friends tend to be | very distant physically but the interactions we have with | them can be intense (like gaming) and frequent. So these | pseudo-friendships can have some elements of a strong | (substitute for the word "real") friendships, but don't | have all of them. | izzydata wrote: | I think it is more implying that friends that you have | exclusively online are more of psuedo-friends than real | friends. Especially if they make no effort to continue | communication after you stop using whatever form of social | media you were using before. | boppo1 wrote: | I don't really have friends anymore. The random strangers on HN | and other boards are the closest thing I have to friends now. I | have a handful of on-off DMs with strangers on instagram. | | I'm not an 'internet person', but the social selection near me | just doesn't gel with who I grew up to be. | Interests/hobbies/politics etc. Hopefully I can get money | together to move soon and find people with whom I fit. | [deleted] | clnq wrote: | What qualifies as "a friend" to you? | | I find it's much easier to make friends online. But we seem to | have different definitions for friendship. | vaidhy wrote: | So, who are "real" friends? Only people who you interact in | face to face? Does the same thing also extend to family? If I | move countries and can only meet my extended family over the | web, they become "not my real" family? | slothtrop wrote: | This weirdly ignores that no one wants or expects to interact | with their family solely virtually indefinitely owing to | distance, and that long-distance friendships made also | entailed having met face-to-face before keeping in touch. | | A friend online can still be friendship, but more limited in | what it can offer. There's no replacement for being with | people, it's a fundamental human need. I've been in close- | knit online communities in the past and never once did it | fulfill social needs. At best it was entertaining. | TrevorJ wrote: | The irony here is that bloggers _were_ a big part of internet | counterculture not so long ago, and now we 've got these long | screeds written on blogs that exude a sort of boomer-ish "back in | _my_ day (6 years ago)... ". | | The take would be a lot more interesting if the targets weren't | so utterly, predicably, boringly safe to criticize either. I | guess dissecting a counterculture that isn't predominantly young | white men into NFT's would take a bit more courage. though. | ly3xqhl8g9 wrote: | "I Don't Want to Be an Internet Person" | | "Ginevra Davis studied Symbolic Systems at Stanford and now works | in art and design. She writes about technology and youth | culture." | | One step would be to stop using your state-issued name on the | internet. "Cr4zyBoy4eva" is a bit better than the | Facebook/LinkedIn-mandated "real name", but rather childish, | hence why an arbitrary UUID string might be a better fit. "There | are no girls on the internet" and "on the internet men are men, | women are also men, and children are FBI agents" point to a | deeper truth, which will only be amplified by the post-Turing | test chatbots, beyond ChatGPT: the internet is not for humans, | there are no humans on the internet, don't be a human on the | internet. | strangattractor wrote: | The state forced Elon Musk to name his kid X AE A-12 Musk just | to embarrass him. Poor kid is going to have a hell of time | getting a drivers license:) | reaperducer wrote: | _stop using your state-given name on the internet._ | | I'm what country does the state decide what your name is? | | I thought that was always the province of someone's parents. | ly3xqhl8g9 wrote: | And how did your parents became Mr. and Mrs. Smith? In all | the countries the "family" name for the hoi polloi was | mandated once the state consolidated. Before, your father's | grand^x-father, who was a blacksmith, was simply known, for | the Dunbar's number of people who knew him, as 'John, the | blacksmith', maybe 'John, Mary's son' if there were two Johns | around. Look at how most of the Scandinavian "family" names | end in "sen" or "datter" meaning, well, son and daughter. | tsukikage wrote: | This may come as a surprise, but in most western countries, | to a first approximation, people can change the name they | use when interacting with the state to whatever they want, | whenever they want. The process does involve a small bit of | tedium, but really isn't particularly onerous or expensive. | | I've had multiple names over the course of my life (and | notes linking them together in various documents should I | ever need to prove to someone that the person with name A | is the same as the person with name B; to date, I never | have). It's pretty common. | | Moreover, people can use whatever name they want in | whatever places they want on the internet, and don't have | to be obvious about it when it's not the same name they use | in other places online or offline. If I tell someone my | name is John Smith, 99.9% of the time all they need that | information for is to know that I am the same person they | interacted with previously; they don't need to know or care | what my bank or my family call me, nor is there any reason | for me to tell them. | jonasdegendt wrote: | There's an amusing anecdote that does the rounds about | Napoleon mandating a national register in the Netherlands, | and the Dutch not taking kindly to that by registering | using all kinds of silly names. Unfortunately for them the | register stuck and centuries later there's people going | through life being called "John Big Buttocks" and such. | | Amusing but alas, from when I looked into it it seemed like | it was made up. | ly3xqhl8g9 wrote: | Not amusing, but true, is the story of Willem Arondeus | [1], who in 1943 destroyed 800,000 identity cards from | the Municipal Office for Population Registration in Nazi- | occupied Netherlands in order to increase the efficiency | of forged documents. The state power, murderous or not, | is the sole beneficiary of the "family" name. | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willem_Arondeus | shanebellone wrote: | It's a phrase describing the name found on your state | identification. | throwaway4aday wrote: | While you're technically correct that the state does not pick | the specific name you are given, in many cases they restrict | which names you can register. Germany has restrictions on | both given names and surnames. State-given name is a misnomer | for the concept though, they should have said state- | registered name. | | https://www.germany.info/us- | en/service/04-FamilyMatters/name... | ly3xqhl8g9 wrote: | Yes, corrected to "state-issued". | hardnose wrote: | I don't want to be a Stanford art major who describes people they | meet in passive-aggressive terms like, "clear skin and dead, | vacant eyes". | thundergolfer wrote: | That comment is not passive-aggression, the second part of the | description is an overt denigration. | glasss wrote: | That was my biggest takeaway. I didn't realize I was reading a | hit piece, but maybe that's my fault. | throwaway4aday wrote: | I'm pretty sure this generalizes to everything. People who | cultivate a persona in any sub-culture or domain seem to be a | fish out of water when confronted in a different context. Take | someone from the rave scene and plop them down in a microbrewery | bar and everyone will gawk at the brightly colored fidgety person | that has no idea what to order. Take a polished SV entrepreneur | and deposit them in an Idaho roadhouse and observe as they | struggle to communicate with patrons that don't speak pitch-deck. | Extremely online people generally don't practice the skills | necessary to communicate well in person like eye contact, | conversation, or manners so you'll get predictable results when | gathering them in meat-space. | | I'm pretty sure a bit of googling will turn up a long history of | articles of this nature dating all the way back to the BBS days. | Having attended BBS meetups I know that the vibe of these | gatherings hasn't changed. | drummojg wrote: | I agree, it's an old notion, and reads somewhat Gibson-ish. I | am enjoying the article. In a way the narrative matters less to | me than the fact that it _feels_ like the old days, and I 'm | glad this kind of zeitgeist is still clacking around the tubes. | ipaddr wrote: | BBS meetups weren't really like that. You had young/old | mismatched people who could communicate because life wasn't | online back then. | toast0 wrote: | BBS meetups are filled with BBS people who may seem | mismatched to outsiders, but their community is the BBS, and | for some, their life is online _on the BBS_ | bradneuberg wrote: | I remember being a young 14 year old going to BBS meetups | full of big bearded Unix and radio wizards, was definitely | awkward AF. | ipaddr wrote: | I remember the family type bbses with different people of | all ages male/female but I also remember my hacker group | meetup where 4 of us shared a 6 pack. Each bbs was it's own | scene | TigeriusKirk wrote: | Our BBS meetups ("bashes" in our lingo) were a wide range | of outside the mainstream people. | | Teenagers with nerdish interests (me and my crowd), hippie | physicists from the local university, BDSM people, swingers | (a lot of swingers, probably party people by nature), a few | Hitler-was-right Nazis here and there, some pagan types, | conspiracy theorists, gay & lesbian folks, and on and on. | There was a some overlap in the crowds, and at the bashes | everyone mixed and matched just fine. Fun was had by all. | | I later dated someone from those bashes for a few years, | and a couple of people from back then are good friends to | this day. Still in touch with a few more, all of whom are | doing interesting things. | nickstinemates wrote: | I'm an internet person who would do well in all scenarios you | mentioned, but those are likely exceptions to the rule. | | I can imagine places I would stand out - but it's within other | niche subcultures like a Biker Bar or homeless encampment. | keiferski wrote: | Yeah, this is the kind of article that should be written by an | open-minded anthropologist, not a Stanford grad intent on being | opinionated. Unfortunately, every time a "hit piece" like this | gets published, it makes the Internet just a little bit less | weird and amenable to interesting subcultures. | ducttapecrown wrote: | It is a magazine and not a journal of anthropology. | maxbond wrote: | I don't think they were necessarily being literal, I think | they meant more, "with the mindset of an anthropologist". | You don't have to be an anthropologist or write for a | journal to approach a situation with an open mind and the | goal of understanding without passing judgement. But if | you're looking to understand what makes a culture tick, | they're probably the people to look to for techniques and | inspiration. | [deleted] | notahacker wrote: | tbh it seems like the author herself is the one that's the fish | out of water. I doubt the people in question are remotely as | interesting, avant-garde or important online as the gushing | intro suggests, but the rest of it seems to mostly be a story | of how a clique were nonplussed by the complete stranger (a | female one too!) turning up to their party asking lots of | questions about online stuff. Sounds like half the people | attending _weren 't_ "very online" (the attendees that don't | know what the NFT is but are here because a friend invited | them, and the scantily-clad girls that aren't normally seen at | such events but seem very much to the tastes of the people | organizing this one) and the ones that _do_ know about the NFT | apparently weren 't interested in talking to strangers who | aren't buying... | | I'm also not sure the world of multiple anime-girl edgelord | personas with NFTs necessarily generalises that well to the | "very online". She could probably have had a quite different | experience at a party of gushingly earnest activists or the | sort of nerds who _stop_ being shy and awkward when someone | asks them about their favourite MMORPG or open source project. | emptyfile wrote: | I'm sorry, are you making some sort of offensive joke or do you | really think the world works in such stereotypes and | prejudices? | | Rave people are "brightly colored and fidgety" ?? A polished | entrepreneur is incapable of ordering in a low class bar? | | Jesus F Christ. | reneherse wrote: | I think you need to get in more. These types of characters | certainly exist, and incongruous juxtapositions are often | entertaining and sometimes enlightening. | wahnfrieden wrote: | people are also prismatic in identity and adaptation. | though, playing against type is also commonly performative. | you're both suggesting a kind of simplistic human form | waboremo wrote: | You're right, instead of using hyperbole to emphasize | their point they should have just highlighted how every | human being is complex and nuanced instead. Surely that | would have done it. | uoaei wrote: | The point as it stands is inappropriate and ultimately | wrong. Or are you saying rationalization of poorly- | thought-out lines of argument trumps respecting people in | all their complexity? | reneherse wrote: | Nothing I've said precludes the possibility of a | prismatic and adaptive identity, nor surprising your | audience. | | Nor did I say having a deep, single or inflexible | identity or persona is necessarily a bad thing. | dang wrote: | We've banned this account for repeatedly breaking the site | guidelines. If it were just one comment, I'd post a warning | instead, but you've been doing it a lot, and it seems to have | been a problem for years: | | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20753535 (Aug 2019) | | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20330020 (July 2019) | | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18621993 (Dec 2018) | | That's not cool. | | If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email | hn@ycombinator.com and give us reason to believe that you'll | follow the rules in the future. They're here: | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html. | mway wrote: | You're missing the point; the hyperbole is used to illustrate | how "person of Domain A" and "person of Domain B" may not | have even basic levels of overlap within a given domain. | uoaei wrote: | No, that point is clear, it's just callous and | disrespectful. | throwaway4aday wrote: | I'm intentionally using extreme examples of people who are | highly committed to the scene they have embedded themselves | in just like TFA interviewed the most extreme members of | "internet people" they could find. Take a minute to think | before immediately reacting with your anti-bias bias. | projectazorian wrote: | Most ravers I know are perfectly capable of ordering a | beer. If they're getting stared at in that scenario it's | purely due to their appearance and mannerisms, not their | inability to interact socially. | | Raves are social events by definition. So someone who goes | to them is likely to have at least some capacity for in- | person interaction. | | (Beer is often sold at raves btw - although many really | serious raver types won't touch alcohol at a rave.) | smbullet wrote: | I enjoy how you jump to the defense of ravers and | entrepreneurs and in the same sentence call a roadhouse | located in Idaho "low class". There's something very poetic | about this cognitive dissonance. | bloodyplonker22 wrote: | It's funny how the most "holier than thou" people are | usually the biggest hypocrites as well. | bnralt wrote: | > People who cultivate a persona in any sub-culture or domain | seem to be a fish out of water when confronted in a different | context. | | It's possible to generalize too much: | | 1. The size of the different context and the extent to which | someone feels like a fish out of water matters. It's one thing | to say that someone might feel a bit out of place if they were | suddenly dropped into an unfamiliar festival in another | country. It's another to say that many people in a particular | subculture are almost incapable of having normal human | interactions in any offline context. | | 2. Sub-cultures aren't all equal, and it's possible for certain | subcultures to encourage behavior that most people would | consider anti-social or unhealthy. | ryandrake wrote: | There are sub-cultures and there are insular sub-cultures | that form someone's entire identity. These Internet people | would be a fish out of water anywhere, whereas the Silicon | Valley entrepreneur might just be able to blend in, | socialize, and find some common ground in that Idaho | roadhouse. You need to have at least some kind of personality | and be capable of a little flexibility. The subjects of the | article were neither. | | I'm fully a raging California leftie now, but whenever I go | back East to my rural hick home town full of rifle ranges, | defunct coal mines, and Trump flags, I can still pass as a | local and somehow manage to not irritate everyone around me. | You have to read the room and be adaptable. You have to set | aside differences and find / focus on the commonalities. This | is not dark wizardry, it's just part of being a N-dimensional | human being. I didn't see N-dimensional humans in the | article. | TrevorJ wrote: | >I didn't see N-dimensional humans in the article. | | I heavily suspect there's a reason for that: the author | didn't write them that way. | rhacker wrote: | Head higher up North. There's still some right leaning | stuff, which for some reason SF newspapers like to call | Far-right extremism. But when you're actually here, it's | probably exactly like your rural rifle-range town. | mikeyouse wrote: | Then again, some of the leadership of those towns are so | far gone that they take obviously nonsense Facebook | posts, have their sheriff hold press conferences lying | that they've verified the posts, and then expend a ton of | time/money/energy looking for "antifa busses" while | passing around far-right newsletters encouraging the | police to prepare for attacks on officers by these same | mythical antifa adherents. Also going so far as to | express support for the Washington militia that | terrorized the random family of campers who made the | mistake of visiting their shitty little town. | | https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/aug/23/revealed- | cal... | [deleted] | satokema wrote: | It's fine whether or not you want to be "online" or "offline" - | you just need to understand that the basic currency is different. | | If you think being an online person is some horrible thing or a | marker of being a bad person, you just value different things. | The kinds of people in TFA are selected for by merit of not | living up to your offline standards in one way or another. | Izkata wrote: | > Internet culture used to be something you engaged with in | private. You have your public self, your real self, and then the | part of your brain that scrolls mindlessly at the end of the day. | | Funny, for me the internet was always where I'd let down the | barriers and drop the facade, the place where you could actually | find the "real me". Then again I don't think I'm the type of | person described by "scrolls mindlessly"... | efishnc wrote: | I actually find that I'm more awkward online/in chats than IRL. | | The fact that you have longer to think about your messages and | modify them before publishing, that you have to think carefully | so as not to multi-text (which seems desperate), that you don't | have access to non-verbal cues for context, can't smile etc. all | contribute to this. | mattgreenrocks wrote: | > I don't want to be anything like these people. I don't want to | be an internet person. | | I love this. I got a similar vibe from people who were "too good | at IRC," way back in the day. They had a constant, sarcastic, | tired energy about them. They had difficulty being genuine about | anything. They knew so much and yet they were so stuck in their | life somehow. And that sucked the life out of them. | | It's like they were too tied to this vague idea of being online | that they weren't willing to sacrifice it to have a better life. | | The Internet is a tool, not an endpoint. | pixl97 wrote: | >The Internet is a tool, not an endpoint. | | Not to be pedant about such things, but there may be a reason | it's a common scifi trope that people are hooked to machines | and live in virtual worlds. It is not out of question that the | internet eventually becomes an endpoint in itself. | mattgreenrocks wrote: | That's not pedantic at all. I've consciously decided I will | favor Real Life over the Internet as much as possible. I | really believe the meme that Nothing Happens On The Internet; | it's a projection of the Real World and as people we are very | susceptible to confusing the map for the territory. | | From the article: | | > You can close the computer, but the world will go on | without you. | | Even if culture decides that the Internet is tantamount to | real life, I'm happy to keep the Internet at arm's length. It | is profoundly weird to me that the private online life I led | in the 90s was something shameful and to be hidden and now | it's okay to be so addicted you become awkward in real life, | constantly on your phone, and that I should give a fuck about | my follower count. | | Besides, accepting that the world will go on without you is | part of adulthood. | gowld wrote: | https://www.quotesoup.com/quotes/movie_tv/tpb_afk_the_pirat | e... | | One of the lawyers: How did you meet Fredrik and Gottfrid? | | Peter Sunde: I don't remember, but I assume it was in a | chat room on the internet. | | One of the lawyers: When was the first time you met IRL? | | Peter Sunde: We don't use the expression IRL. We say AFK. | But that's another issue. But, I don't remember that | either. | | Tomas Norstrom - District Court Judge: Got to know each | other IRL? What is that? | | One of the lawyers: In Real Life. | | Peter Sunde: We don't like that expression. We say AFK - | Away From Keyboard. We think that the internet is for real. | vsareto wrote: | There's some real value in social circles around games. | Even if accomplishing things in game might be seen as a | nothing, those social ties can be real. | mattgreenrocks wrote: | Yes. Because the game is the medium for connection, and | overcoming challenges in a group of people who want to do | that is pretty magical. GitHub is similar in the sense | that people have a shared, common goal. I love stuff like | that. | | Most traditional social media doesn't work as well for | me. I need an underlying common goal. | waboremo wrote: | The bigger impact here when it comes to internet/real life | schism is the fact that employers will utilize any digital | footprint to make judgments about you, and subsequently | fire you or refuse to hire you because of it. At the same | time, having a follower count beyond a certain threshold | also gives you access to a lot of real life resources. Both | of these have tremendous impact on people in many ways, as | an example one of the careers kids have most wanted to | become in several decades now has been internet-focused | (youtubers, tiktokers, influencers, etc). | | That's the issue with the qualifier "as much as possible". | That will always be sliding towards increasing levels of | digitalization that the qualifier becomes meaningless. | mattgreenrocks wrote: | It certainly has an influence on one's life, but I refuse | to make it the center point. I also refuse to be anxious | about the fire/no-hire potential it can pose. | | It is a useful medium for sharing things and I'm always | open to contributing more good content online. But being | Extremely Online? No thank you. | pixl97 wrote: | Why not reverse it, I push a button on the computer and | something falls out of the sky IRL. Your smart electric | meter turns off. The water company shuts off your service. | The internet is real life as much as you cannot tow a | leaking oil tanker 'out of the environment'. | | People don't need the internet to be narcissistic, they've | done that fine for thousands of years without it. | rhacker wrote: | no, when you meet many grounded people they're helpful, | want to help fix your tire, see if you're ok. Things have | changed towards narcissism and unless you're older than | 35 you probably can't see that. | | pressing a button to have something fall into reality is | another thing that creates narcissism. You don't see any | of the people involved in getting that thing to you. You | can start seeing the world as your personal slave at your | bidding. Now for centuries, yes, there have been rich | people that can do that. If we make that accessible to a | LOT more people - everyone has a butler that they don't | need to even talk to. | | I don't know what I'm saying right now other than - the | world is vastly different than it was pre-internet. It | can't go back. Things are forever changed for the worst | in some (most?) categories. | kwhitefoot wrote: | > everyone has a butler that they don't need to even talk | to. | | Aristocracy in some parts of the world didn't talk _to_ | staff, they would just announce in the presence of the | servant that something was needed and expect that it be | provided. | Karrot_Kream wrote: | "The children now love luxury; they have bad manners, | contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders | and love chatter in place of exercise. Children are now | tyrants, not the servants of their households. They no | longer rise when elders enter the room. They contradict | their parents, chatter before company, gobble up dainties | at the table, cross their legs, and tyrannize their | teachers." -- Socrates | | Cultures, people, and attitudes change. They've been | changing for millenia and they'll continue to change. | lqet wrote: | > They had a constant, sarcastic, tired energy about them. They | had difficulty being genuine about anything. | | I knew such a guy on IRC back in 2003. We all kind of looked up | to him on the channel. He was quite eloquent and had (what | seemed to us) an enormous knowledge of history and philosophy. | His sarcasm bordered on sophisticated nihilism. He spoke to us | like Colonel Kurtz from _Apocalypse Now_. His occupation was | nebulous. | | Now, 20 years later, a former channel member and I (both in our | mid-30ies now, with families and jobs) exchange a few nostalgic | mails every 1-2 months in the typical lingo of our channel. We | still make fun of this guy as the personification of nihilistic | evil, a kind of mythical uber-mephisto of the internet. But in | reality, we all realized _decades_ ago that he was just this | strange, bitter, unemployed guy in his late 30ies or early | 40ies (older than we are now), who spent his entire life in | front of mIRC. His history knowledge and nihilism boiled down | to repeated Nazi jokes, and his philosophy knowledge was based | on a few Nietzsche texts he must have read. We were a bunch of | pubertal school kids on some Quakenet channel, and he, more | than twice our age, was a kind of tribal god to us. He clearly | enjoyed it. It was pathetic. | | Some of the people described in this (excellent) article very | strongly reminded me of him. | polishdude20 wrote: | I wouldn't say it's pathetic. People try and get | power/control/ a sense of meaning anywhere they can. This man | probably didn't have a great life and found his only refuge | and belonging to be in IRC. The alternative may have been to | confront harsh reality and realize you're nobody to noone. | austhrow743 wrote: | >This man probably didn't have a great life and found his | only refuge and belonging to be in IRC. The alternative may | have been to confront harsh reality and realize you're | nobody to noone. | | That sounds quite pathetic to me. | sharkjacobs wrote: | "pathetic" means pitiable, from the greek "pathos" | | > This man probably didn't have a great life and found his | only refuge and belonging to be in IRC. The alternative may | have been to confront harsh reality and realize you're | nobody to noone | | I think this fits the bill | [deleted] | the_only_law wrote: | > The alternative may have been to confront harsh reality | and realize you're nobody to noone. | | God I wish more would. | Loughla wrote: | Why? I don't understand what you're getting at. | clnq wrote: | Most people are much too self-important. If you think at | the global scale, each of our existence (except those in | position of extraordinary decision-making power) is | pretty unimportant/inconsequential outside of the realm | of chaos theory. | | I think that understanding this is the first step of | putting yourself in a position of power. Self-importance | is very blinding. | Loughla wrote: | It's exactly like Reddit power mods, or that one guy that | edits half of wikipedia or whatever the statistic is. It's | pathetic to some people, sure, but if it isn't hurting | anyone and the person chooses that life, not simply falls | into it for lack of options, what's the harm? | | It's power in a place they are comfortable with. The issue | is when that impacts actual human relationships, or is | turned for purposes that are (for lack of a better way to | quantify it) bad. | | Power mods using their influence to make sure the | subreddits follow the individual sub rules, and ensuring | that nothing nefarious slips into the general | consciousness- it gives that person a sense of worth and | meaning. Great! | | Power mods using their influence to sell products, market | products surreptitiously, squash stories they don't | personally agree with, or otherwise abuse said power - bad | bad bad. Not Great! | clnq wrote: | > It's pathetic to some people, sure, but ... what's the | harm? | | Hmm, pathetic doesn't mean harmful. It's closer by | meaning to "feeble", which I agree with in the case of | Reddit moderators. I don't think they are very | influential at all. | woodruffw wrote: | I thought this sounded familiar, and sure enough[1]. | | Edit: To make it explicit, which Palladium notably fails to do: | this person is a reactionary and has a history of encouraging | young girls to commit suicide. | | [1]: https://web3isgoinggreat.com/?id=founder-of-milady-nft- | proje... | BlueTemplar wrote: | Here's some anti-Palladium then : | | https://mcrumps.substack.com/ | WFHRenaissance wrote: | <deleted> | mtlmtlmtlmtl wrote: | CharlotteFang literally admitted to being Miya on their own | Twitter, the link is right in the page linked by GP. | WFHRenaissance wrote: | <deleted> | mtlmtlmtlmtl wrote: | >Miya is an egregore. CharlotteFang was status-jacking | here. | | Uh-huh. Fascinating. Do go on. | alduin32 wrote: | Are internal posts by CharlotteFang asking to "search & | remove any occurrences do kaliacc" status-jacking as well | ? | sugersvoltet wrote: | >While CharlotteFang may be termed something close to | reactionary (if your IQ is low and you can only think of 3 or | 4 political archetypes) | | I would put them more in the neo-Nazi / pseudo-Esoteric | Hitlerist archetype (https://archive.ph/qlYqD): | | >How to save a nation in 5 steps: | | >First, you kill the Jews, who always seek to ruin and | exploit other nations. | | >Then, you remove any peoples who are not native to the | country in question*. | | >Then, you remove any vestigial influence left by the Jews, | either by re-education, physical removal or otherwise. This | includes everything under the cultural marxist platform: | feminism, homosexuality, "sexual revolution," etc. | | >Then, you will work to re-coup and re-discover any heritage | that may have been lost due to Jewish influence. You will | work to carefully modernize your country based on the | principles traditional to its native culture. | | >Now you may allow non-natives into the country but with | limited rights on a temporary basis. Other peoples and | countries will not be discriminated against, they will each | be considered meritable under their own culture; but nothing | will be done to draw their influence into the country's own | identity. | | And before one argues this was edgy rusing and meming and | LARPing and all that, CharlotteFang/Miya was an active, long- | time moderator and owner of several 8chan /pol/ offshoot | imageboard websites and boards, as well as a heavy poster on | the original 8chan /pol/, all of which have connections to | neo-Nazi mass shootings, including one attempted mass | shooting of a synagogue (who Miya and friends affectionately | refer to as "doorcuck" because he failed to breach the door | of the synagogue and resigned himself to murdering some | nearby civilians instead). | | Plus a perusal of their old Twitter makes it very obvious | exactly where their sympathies lie. It's all Savitri Devi | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savitri_Devi) type stuff. | [deleted] | alduin32 wrote: | This person admitted[1] to being the same person behind the | Miya account. The posts made by that Miya account (they are | public record, and has been archived since a long time by | different accounts, see [2]) include : | | - calls for the extermination of Jews | | - calling homosexuality an "epidemic" and perversion | | - saying that "since we gave vote to *** we should give to | gorillas too" | | - things like "a husband is to his wife what a parent is to | their child" | | - asking counsel for "mind controlling an egirl slave harem" | | - boasting about bullying persons about their weight | | How is that "close to reactionary" ? This is extremely grave | behavior. I have friends that have suffered a lot from this | community, have witnessed their posts myself at the time they | were made, and I cannot even begin to comprehend how could | someone call that "close to reactionary if your IQ is low | [...]" and end that with "DYOR". It hurts a lot to see that | comment, and it makes me feel extremely uneasy to see these | posts, especially one on "I don't want to be an Internet | person" upvoted to the front page of HN. I don't know how to | describe it, but there's something really nasty going on | here. | | [1]: https://mobile.twitter.com/CharlotteFang77/status/152798 | 7970... [2]: https://github.com/0xngmi/milady | thorncorona wrote: | There was a (now deleted) tweet of a photo of a teen girl | who they pushed into carving a swastika into her belly. He | boasted about this as well. | | Another thread, describing how Yuga Cali pushed kids into | committing suicide, as well as other NSFL activities. | | https://twitter.com/0xngmi/status/1528572556894142464 | ahoy wrote: | Palladium is a Thiel-backed rightwing propaganda outlet that | insists it's "non partisan". It's a shame to see t shared here | batman-farts wrote: | I did not know, but am not surprised, that Palladium takes | Thiel funding. That greatly clarifies this article's purpose | for me. It seemed odd to see another think piece about the | NFT trend when it has already largely burned itself out, but | Davis here is acting as something of a "party whip" for | Thiel's nascent political movement. The message of the | article is much more aimed at the people being described in | the article than it is at you or I: be less like these | insipid Twitter personalities, be more like JD Vance and | Blake Masters. | s5300 wrote: | Sorry if I've misinterpreted something you've stated - but | as somebody from the "area", I just wanted to mention JD | Vance is an astroturfed loser in the most major way & | absolutely nobody should aspire to be like him. | | Like, I'm pretty sure I'm from _the_ poorest district in | the state /area. | | Vance is a fucking loser any of the even mildly intelligent | around despise. | mechanical_bear wrote: | I disagree. I also think there is more value in debating the | message rather than the outlet. | fleetwoodsnack wrote: | There's nothing lost knowing more about a source of | information. In most disciplines it's actually a necessary | step in interpreting text. | [deleted] | Barrin92 wrote: | >Thiel-backed | | I think that's in fact a reason why, and even the article | itself is aware of this, these subcultures and the commentary | on it seem so banal in real life. In reality it's more or | less an economic grift to get funded by ideologically | motivated venture capitalists, and everything centers around | this. In Germany we call it "Hofberichterstattung". something | like royal court reporting. | woodruffw wrote: | Exactly. It's also particularly concerning to see them | increasingly adopt the esoteric, syncretic style of | reactionary writing. | ImaCake wrote: | As someone who has recently discovered my neurodivergence, the | first few paragraphs strike me as being very cruel towards | people who are different. The internet, and niche social | spaces, have given those who can't fit in a means to build | community. | AStellersSeaCow wrote: | And yet, here you are. | hacym wrote: | Being online and making it your entire personality and reality | are two very different things. | coldtea wrote: | > _Like most online culture, it all feels so profound until you | realize that he hasn't said anything at all._ | | So pretty much like TFA... Which is basically a virtue signalling | hit piece (the target even asks "if they're planning to write a | hit piece"). | | "The content of his work would repel, or simply confuse, a | traditional viewer" | | ... and then the author points to a screenshot of a tweet (the | "drop out of college, default on your student loans" etc (of | which the most controversial part is about not getting the covid | vaccine) that would seem totally quaint under lots of pretty tame | contexts (from 60s counter-culture and 70s punk fanzines all the | way to modern leftists), as if the average Joe is the standard | after which anything becomes scary... | | > _To 99.9 percent of the population, Charlie is nobody_ | | So just like the author? | LastTrain wrote: | So clearly all you did was get angry about a couple of lines in | the article that were disparaging to Charlie. Did you not read | the whole thing and understand the larger point? That Charlie | is likely in the small group of people today who are setting | the norms for tomorrow? | coldtea wrote: | > _So clearly all you did was get angry about a couple of | lines in the article that were disparaging to Charlie._ | | Rather, I read the whole thing, and grasped its tone, | intention, and structure. | | > _That Charlie is likely in the small group of people today | who are setting the norms for tomorrow?_ | | Charlie and his "influence" is insignificant to the "norms of | tomorrow", and if you take away the jabs at "weirdos" like | Charlie from the article, the only thing that remains is a | tired old "online vs offline" diatribe, the kind of which has | been written 200 times a day since 1997 or so. | hacym wrote: | You're weirdly trying to attack the author. Why is that? | coldtea wrote: | Because I don't like reading shallow hit jobs, and I think | it's not just sloppy writing, but reflects to their authors | too. | hacym wrote: | How is an opinion piece a shallow hit job? If you're | reading this as some credible news... stop? | throwaway346434 wrote: | Picture this article being written a vi/vim user; about | all of those "freaks who use emacs". | | At some point you realise the writer is doing the same | kind of thing as the people described, their criticisms | make a low effort to understand and declare the "other | side" wrong, for reasons that are basically "I didnt like | it". | | From other comments here, I've since learned there is | plenty to criticise about the speech, actions, behaviour | of this individual, which is trivial to discover. | throwaway346434 wrote: | The author did exactly what the subject of the critical | opinion piece did, but did a worse job of it and was entirely | unself critical. | shanebellone wrote: | Good morning, Charlie. | rideontime wrote: | Unlike Charlie, the author isn't pretending not to be a nobody. | che_shirecat wrote: | milady | idiotsecant wrote: | If HN will permit a bit of old-man-shakes-fist-at-cloud I think | the internet was better before we went and let so many _people_ | on it. It was small and poorly organized and weird and mostly | authentic. The hyperactive and over-exaggerated always-on | 'youtube personality' wasn't a thing and people talked about | interesting things from time to time. | boredumb wrote: | The pattern here is not the internet but these people being | severely autistic and so they are probably forced to thrive | online where they aren't having to deal with eye contact or other | social queues that they can't really process. Not even sure what | this was meant to be, but it should probably be rewritten to "I | don't want to be an autistic person" and it would have read the | exact same way. Even down to the preferred drug use being a | straight up dissociative... | throwaway346434 wrote: | boppo1 wrote: | The only real way out is solitude. | jacooper wrote: | > lack of bothering to ask about pronouns | | Because no body actually cares, no body will use your made up | pronouns. | | > use of the words "normal people" and infiltrating a group | only to neg them to be more problematic than anything. | | Isn't it obvious that the people in this group are clearly | not normal?, they even admit themselves! | bitwize wrote: | > Because no body actually cares, no body will use your | made up pronouns. | | This is why some transgender and nonbinary people have | stopped trying to reason with their friends and family | about their gender identity, and have resorted to clicker- | training them like dogs to use the appropriate pronouns and | pay them basic human respect and dignity. | mechanical_bear wrote: | See also: How to get tossed from family gatherings in | three easy steps. | jacooper wrote: | An example of the "My way or the highway" strategy | failing miserably. | jacooper wrote: | Yeah sure, made up or broken pronouns = human dignity. | | > have resorted to clicker-training them like dogs... | | I doubt thats going to help with the human dignity of | your family either. | ClassyJacket wrote: | Refusing to play ridiculous pronoun games is not hurting | your respect and dignity. It is not anybody else's | problem or responsibility to participate in this. | suslik wrote: | There is a difference between the usage of 'xer' by an | edgy teenager who identifies as something | incomprehensible vs, for instance, using 'she/her' to | refer to a biological male that made a conscious, adult | decision to transition to female. | | If one decides to change their first name, they have | every right for their friends and family to respect that. | If I wanted to be called, for instance, Vladimir instead | of Richard, it would be really bloody rich if my mom | insisted on the name _she_ thinks fits me better. Same | with sex/gender transition (I am not up to date on | terminology here, but you know what I mean) - there is | nothing more than showing basic respect for choices an | individual does for themselves. | jacooper wrote: | > xer' by an edgy teenager who identifies as something | incomprehensible vs, for instance, using 'she/her' to | refer to a biological male that made a conscious, adult | decision to transition to female. | | They are both the same. | | Also not transitioning, but pretending to be a women, and | becoming a profit machine for medical companies in the | process. | tetrep wrote: | How are peoples' names less made up than their pronouns? It | seems just as rude to refuse to use someone's preferred | name as you would their preferred pronouns. | bloak wrote: | I mostly agree with that: if someone is a participant or | a potential participant in the conversation then we | should refer to them in a way they find acceptable, | provided their demands are reasonable and in good faith. | On the other hand, if someone is speaking or writing | about me in a language I don't understand then it's | hardly my job to tell them what pronouns to use and I | can't even reasonably tell them how to pronounce, and | perhaps decline, my name. (Try looking up some | internationally famous people in the Latvian or | Lithuanian Wikipedias. Obviously I'm not famous enough to | be in there, but if I were, would I have any right to be | treated differently from Risi Suneks?) | | A journalist writing about someone they've interviewed | ... as part of doing the best they can for the people | they serve, the readers, perhaps in some cases it's | reasonable for them to ignore the preferences of the | interviewee? | throwaway346434 wrote: | My problem is the author deliberately states they didnt | bother to ask, and does so in a way that is almost | bragging about it. | | Through the article, this happens in various forms. | | If the point of the article is to criticise someone's | behaviour for being an "internet cool person"; opening by | your opinion piece by stating _you were too cool to | bother to do something_ ; and later stating that _you as | the writer are a normal person_ , and that _you feel sick | after infilitrating a group_ , there is a level of | hypocrisy there. | | I agree with you there are legitimate cases for ignoring | someone's preferences to improve the quality of | information imparted. However, the author doesnt state | any apart from "didnt bother". | rhino369 wrote: | Customized personal pronouns are just another name. They | lose all value if they are high customizable. | | I get why people don't want to misgendered. But making up | a new pronoun comes across as aggressive attention | seeking. | throwayyy479087 wrote: | Outside of a small set of Twitter/Tumblr/TikTok bubbles | (which overlap in userbase), pronouns are fixed: | he/she/they (rarely they). Xe/Xir is not something | average people will honor or use. | fleddr wrote: | Outside a college campus in California, nowhere else in the | world do people ask for pronouns when they meet a person. | It's not a normal human interaction. | throwaway346434 wrote: | People who use different pronouns are about 5% of | americans: | | https://www.pewresearch.org/fact- | tank/2022/06/07/about-5-of-... | | Similar rates in other countries: | | https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_depar | t... | | You might not do it when you meet someone. But think about | the sheer number of web forms, systems or standards that | are about to have to go down a rabbit hole of whether they | are modeling biological sex (medical systems), terms of | address (people focused systems), etc. | | Would you turn away 5% of your customer base because you | didnt add a third option (ie: i prefer another term) when | capturing someone's details? | ClassyJacket wrote: | Unfortunately this is not longer true. This pronoun garbage | is infiltrating real life now. | jacooper wrote: | Push back. | hooverd wrote: | I do find it funny when people go out of their way to use | the wrong pronouns. | jacooper wrote: | And I find it funny that people get offended if I dont | break language rules for them. | clnq wrote: | Not sure if it's autism or edgy angst. | chippy wrote: | I went down the rabbit hole after reading this, as I love sub | cultures and yearn to see some new ones. Some learnings: | | Now there is a certain avant garde playing with the narrative | thing going on, which is part of it, so the story that you can | find out about the thing is changed at the time its going on and | after its happened. The lore is recorded by people within the | culture and they are in on it. Certain of the interactions with | the author and the characters she met were on the whole staged, | or intentional trolling of the author. "some young writer is | coming so let's tease her". | | The trolling, anti-cancel culture, the pro-autism always-online | which may have come from the chans is almost 100% opposite from | the "white pilled", positive, almost over the top caring messages | that the subculture is putting out. But it's not the same as the | we are all going to make it greed-optimism of crypto. | | As we see in these fellow comments, most people who have | encountered internet people have found them to be nihilistic, | anti-social, maladjusted and negative. This sub culture is trying | to be the opposite of it, but it exists along side a kind of | schizoid-side - it's very odd. | | Compared to other NFT young people meet ups (the author | previously wrote a popular article about the Bored Yacht Club | parties) - this subculture appears to have more women. | | Compared to other NFT projects, this art project does not | prioritize holding or purchasing an actual NFT image, and seems | to value a kind of plagiarism, "just download the png" or anti | ownership in a way. It reminds of of plunderphonics/vaporwave | from last decade. | | The traditional and social politics of the founders seem at odds | with a rave and taking drugs. puzzling to me! Someone here says | that the drug - Ketamine is apparently chosen as reduced social | anxiety? | syntheweave wrote: | I found XOXO conference to be much the same way. The attendees | were capable of some basic social grace, but having manifested | from the context of "internet people," they lacked substance in | person. | | It's not hard to not be an internet person. You just have to | decide to actually study something, anything, and to a deep | level. Once you do that the grounding manifests itself and then | you have more important priorities that preclude drifting around | like that. | neilk wrote: | I suspect this is an attempt to troll us all into fighting, by | bringing up a beloved conference that some might classify as | "woke". | | But anyway, there's something to what you say but I think that | analogy doesn't go very far. | | Every year the hosts have, in their intro keynote, urged | attendees to be more outgoing than normal. So yeah there are | lots of introverts. | | But the promise is that being more outgoing will pay off - | because XOXO is curated to be entirely nice nerds. And it's | very anti-grifting. The scene the OP portrayed of e-girls and | NFT guys seems like a polar opposite of their vibe. It's more | literature nerds showing off their board game about Pride & | Prejudice, or an indie game about a mischievous goose. The | whole point of XOXO, I think, was to find people who were doing | internet stuff for the love of it. | ryandrake wrote: | Back in the day, I went and attended a "Fark Party". Remember | Fark? Well, they actually had meatspace events, and they were | as pasty and awkward as you could possibly imagine! Mostly a | bunch of 20-year-olds who were much less interesting than they | thought they were. Fortunately, the one I went to was in Vegas, | so it was easy to ditch the edgelords and go have fun. | | A few people mentioned the article's subject matter being | Gibsonish, but if I recall (haven't read him in a while), | Gibson's cyber-characters were not just online-cool, but were | generally backed by richly complex humans. The influencers and | Twitterati the author describes have barely any human | personality behind them--they're all boring, vacuous, | superficial. | | "You're really not that interesting."[1] | | 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-ZTksDoH6w | trentnix wrote: | It's Vampire: The Masquerade for the modern rebel. | toyg wrote: | Being socially-challenged enough that you can only work hidden | behind a screen hardly makes you a "rebel". | Apocryphon wrote: | I think another one of the themes of that setting was that | the Sabbat or the Anarchs were themselves LARPing as rebels | against the Camarilla while creating their own petty kingdoms | to control. A rebel today is a warlord tomorrow. Perhaps the | same could be said of keyboard warriors. | photochemsyn wrote: | I'm not sure if the sociological experiment that the author | conducted was really immersive enough to produce a good take on | the subculture. It's fairly obvious this was intended along the | lines of Hunter S. Thompson's "Hell's Angels" - which may have | spawned an entire genre of sub-culture literature (I don't know | if Thompson really originated it or not, there may be earlier | examples, perhaps Zora Neale Hurston). The theme is pretty | consistent: a writer inserts self into subculture, gets the full | experience, writes magazine articles/books that others can gawk | at. | | Maybe this particular subculture is just fairly boring and | shallow, mostly fabricated by moneyed interests (NFTs...) and | there's just not much to say about it? Kind of sad, has the USA | turned into a cultural wasteland? | greenhearth wrote: | Raymond Williams has theorized the nature of subcultures | (residual and emergent), which are almost always incorporated | into the mainstream in one form or another. I'm afraid that | because this culture is so incredibly toxic that the effects of | this incorporation will be like a collective poisoning. This | can already be seen in the resulting superstructure (art, | politics, finance) and mainstream social relations, all of | which are deteriorated and confused more than ever it seems. | | In any case, I noticed the Thompson similarities as well. This | kind of reportage flicks the light switch in a dark room, in | which then the cockroaches run for the corners. | photochemsyn wrote: | Yeah, I can't really blame the author for not wanting to go | any further down that particular rabbit hole. From what I've | read, it also sounds unpleasantly similar to conditions in | the FTX/Alameda warren. | TheOtherHobbes wrote: | This seems quite silly. Adolescent nihilism and alienation, | scatter-shot irrationality, and calculated transgressions for | attention are ancient. As is cynical opportunism. They've been | part of (mostly) youth movements for centuries. | | The only thing changed by the Internet is accessibility. | Previously people tended to know each other personally. Now they | can mix it up online. This makes their presence a little more | obvious and a little harder to ignore. | | But there must be hundreds of these micro-scenes with their nano- | gurus and micro-leaders, and most people will still never come | across them. | | They only become dangerous when they grow - or are grown - to the | point where the groups stop being small and insignificant, and | where the messaging is carefully and deliberately tailored to | trigger irrationality and self-harm in mass audiences. | | That's not a good thing. But it's no worse - and often less | effective and less toxic - than some of the nonsense pumped out | by supposedly respectable mainstream media. | Eumenes wrote: | Is this journalism? | helios_invictus wrote: | Does it matter? | LastTrain wrote: | Why do you ask? | flyingfences wrote: | yes | greenhearth wrote: | Yes, it's gonzo, in tradition of Hunter S. Thompson | pksebben wrote: | editorial. it's not making any bones about being an opinion | piece | hacym wrote: | It's an editorial piece, closer to opinion than news. | buildsjets wrote: | There is no requirement for HN submissions to be journalistic, | so I don't know why you were expecting that. | | What to Submit | | On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. | That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to | reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that | gratifies one's intellectual curiosity. | double_ee wrote: | BWStearns wrote: | I like the piece. The tone kinda gives me the same vibes as Neil | Strauss' The Game (vibe heavy anthropology trip into the | distasteful, or at least unnerving, subculture). | | The part at the very end about the internet people winning is the | part that freaks me out (and drives my own middlingly unhealthy | doom-scrolling). Just the other day I saw Curtis Yarvin is now | some minor Rasputin figure for Peter Thiel, and I couldn't help | but think "that lunatic monarchist edgelord from years ago is now | influencing where real real political money gets spent?" I don't | want to be an internet person, or even pay as much attention as I | do, but it feels kind of like even if you don't believe in the | internet, it believes in you and it'll eventually show up | anyways. | mkeeter wrote: | Ironically, Palladium magazine (which published this article) | itself is backed by Peter Thiel, and is... not unsympathetic to | that worldview. | | For example, "Science Needs Sovereigns": | https://www.palladiummag.com/2022/10/03/science-needs-sovere... | TremendousJudge wrote: | It reads a lot like Neal Stephenson to me, both the tone and | the topic. | | Anyway, if you like that sort of dives into a weird subculture | let me recommend Sam Fussell's Muscle. Here's an interview with | the author that got me to read the book: | http://www.drmichaeljoyner.com/sam-fussell-an-interview-with... | BWStearns wrote: | I didn't consider that because it's nonfiction but I can see | that now. Thanks for the recommendation! | nootropicat wrote: | Online reality is as much real as the physical one, and as | technology for io to the human body advances it's going to | increasingly dominate. | | She feels noticeably superior to people that prefer the online | reality for unclear reasons. | jacooper wrote: | > You hear it all the time--"the internet is horrible, but." But | I can learn so much. I need it for work. All my friends are | online | | But these are not the Internet's problem, rather edge | forums/social media problems, however I recognize that for many | people, the internet is just social media at this point. | | A true internet person should be one who uses it frequently, that | would probably be a software developer, yet most of the time they | aren't as crazy as these people. | | > He slouched in his chair and told me, unprompted, that he | doesn't have many friends | | Wow. | | These people are just mentally ill at this point, its impressive | that they were able to attract girls to this shitshow. | | Also how do they make money? Do they all just sell NFTs ? | | > I don't want to be anything like these people. I don't want to | be an internet person. | | Amen. | sugersvoltet wrote: | >Also how do they make money? Do they all just sell NFTs ? | | Correct, they sell NFTs of mass-generated cartoon art. | joemazerino wrote: | I appreciate this article. First, it is well written. Second, it | is well-versed. | | I know many, many people who have fallen into this trap of being | an Internet "coolguy" and are absolute boring, anxious and | insecure nerds in meatspace. Ironically they often yearn to | connect their irl popularity with their internet personality. | It's as if they realize the Internet moves fast with or without | them. | warinukraine wrote: | Off-topic. Does it bother anyone else this style of writing which | starts by describing the physical traits of the characters? At | this stage I just skip when an article starts like that. | nonrandomstring wrote: | Behind "Creepy is the new cool" lies ambivalence [1]. Author | Ginevra Davis writes a voluminous 4300 words that revel in, | celebrate and exalt a culture which, in her parting sentence, she | reveals to be the sum of all her fears. | | [1] | https://psychology.stackexchange.com/questions/4415/current-... | amatecha wrote: | Flagged the post as I don't think a person engaging in the | behaviour discussed in this[0] thread needs a greater audience or | needs to be paid any attention whatsoever. | | [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33893781 | Ensorceled wrote: | I grew up a geek in a rural area, learning how to filter | conversations for your audience was a critical skill. | | Topics and conversational style amongst my D&D group was very | different than amongst my other high school classmates and very | different than when at my summer jobs. | | This is just an article about people who never learned that | skill. | | I'm reminded of a few moments in my life that drove this home ... | | A coworker (60 year old railway worker) who said "You shouldn't | use ten dollar words in a twenty-five cent conversation." | | A girlfriend who described the difference as "Weird is when you | know you're weird and compensate when needed, strange is when you | don't know you're strange." | Loughla wrote: | I grew up very geek in a VERY rural area. I knew that there | were places that I could be me, where I could be "country" me, | and where I could be me "for adults". I learned that the me | what I was, was also super unacceptable once I entered the | world of higher education. I had to be "smart" me. | | Then in my undergraduate degree, I learned about code switching | in the context of Mexican-American children of immigrants. And | it hit hard. | | I was code-switching, but within dialects inside of one | language instead of within languages. I also learned in that | class that EVERY student who grew up rural, poor, minority, or | anything other than middle- to upper-middle class white had | extremely similar experiences. It was absolutely shocking to 20 | year old me. | | To your point - this article absolutely reads like people who | just never learned how to navigate different groups. | clnq wrote: | Code switching is completely natural to me, I would not know | how to express myself with just one language to some people. | What did you learn about it that impacted you the most? | Loughla wrote: | Honestly, just that it existed and was a common feature of | some peoples' lives. | | I grew up feeling very outcast. I grew up in a town of less | than 50, in a super poor, rural part of the US. My | interests were outdoors related, but not guns and god like | everyone around me. I was more interested in learning about | natural systems and the interplay of wild plants and | animals and humans in the world. I never 'fit in' anywhere. | None of the school clubs, none of the classes, everywhere I | went I felt that I had to 'be someone else'. | | Then I went to college and learned that, for many people, | they literally get to do that every day, and that there was | a name for it! It felt validating that someone else in the | world experienced what I experienced (even if it was whole- | language based instead of just dialect/cultural norm | based). | clnq wrote: | Interesting, thanks for sharing. | segh wrote: | See also masking | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masking_(personality) | clnq wrote: | Masking seems to have a negative connotation. Usually, | and indeed in the Wikipedia article above, it's presented | as a boundary or defence mechanism against societal | pressures. But interestingly, etiquette involves a lot of | masking and the aim is to make interactions more pleasant | for all parties. | Ensorceled wrote: | This is similar to masking but also very different. I | just don't talk about geek stuff with family and friends | back home because they are not interested. They do, | however, know I'm a geek so I'm not "hiding" that from | them. | | Nor did I suffer abuse or humiliation from classmates or | coworkers that made me change my behaviour. | joe_the_user wrote: | _This is just an article about people who never learned that | skill._ | | Is it? I read part and skimmed part, admittedly, but I got the | impression this was just an article portraying a particular | subculture, one the author wasn't not at all fond of. The | author seems to actually take the opposite of your tolerant | view that people naturally can use multiple "topics and | conversation styles" in multiple social context. I would agree | with you but it seems For the author, the topics and | conversation styles of the people at this event are the primary | evidence that they couldn't be normal in any other context. | That and one guy having "shifty eyes". | macNchz wrote: | We were introduced to the concept of "self monitoring"^ in | social psychology classes in college, which attempts to | describe this phenomenon. | | Reading about it was a bit of a light bulb moment for me, as it | offered some explanation for why I'd always made friends with | people from varying social circles, who often seemed to not get | along with each other, while finding it relatively easy myself | to get along with most any social group. | | ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-monitoring | vitaflo wrote: | Yup, also a nerd that grew up in a poor rural area. Some of my | friends struggled with this but for me it really taught me how | to be a chameleon. It also taught me to keep an open mind. | While I wasn't into sports (like most nerds) I did find I | really liked bowling and was on a league with many of the other | redneck kids I wouldn't normally hang out with. I learned I had | more in common with people than I thought, even if I really | only opened up with my small nerdy crew of friends. | | It's paid dividends as an adult because in most situations I | can guess there's at least something I have in common with | others even if it doesn't seem obvious at first. I can go most | places and feel (or at least look) like I fit in. It's also | allowed me to have a broad range of interests as an adult that | I may not have had had I stayed more insular. | nullstyle wrote: | Damn, palladium has really fallen off, quality-wise, since their | launch. | jrm4 wrote: | Author seems a little too close? For me, the big takeaway is how | it represents the superficiality that happens here? Like, this | whole thing _wants_ to be genuinely cool /Gibson-ish, but I can't | get over the banality of it all. | | I was poking around some of the content and it's just so blah, in | terms of how they're just taking a laundry list of _every_ hot | button issue and then asking, "okay, how can I troll it?" -- | revealing no core underneath. | rideontime wrote: | IDK, it's even more damning that someone who wanted to believe | couldn't bring herself to do so. | rideontime wrote: | These people are exactly as pathetic as I imagined them to be. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-12-07 23:00 UTC)