[HN Gopher] BlackRock 2023 Outlook [pdf] ___________________________________________________________________ BlackRock 2023 Outlook [pdf] Author : baal80spam Score : 38 points Date : 2022-12-08 20:42 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.blackrock.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.blackrock.com) | qclibre22 wrote: | There's old saying in finance: "Never trust an analyst". | | If the analysis is so great, it won't be distributed on the | internet for free. These financial management firms are always | "talking their book", that is they cherry pick their data to | support their portfolio. | | Black Rock has seriously underperformed compared to XLF ( ETF for | finance) year to date. | | Perhaps they are just looking for excuses. | aftbit wrote: | Leaving aside the question of whether it's portfolio appropriate | or a good idea, how does an individual reasonably invest in | global investment grade credit or inflation protected bonds? | | I see TIPS in the US paying at ~1.5% while 5 year T-notes are at | 4+%. Assuming that inflation will continue to drop, but remain | above the target, wouldn't we expect to see T-bills and T-notes | continuing to outperform TIPS? | | Surely I am misunderstanding something... | makestuff wrote: | On interactive brokers you can modify trading permissions to | trade fixed income products. I assume other brokers have | similar settings. | drexlspivey wrote: | TIPS yield are real yields (already adjusted for inflation) | while T-Notes aren't so they aren't really comparable. In | essence you are getting 1.5% on top of inflation. | daydream wrote: | Starting with I bonds is your best bet as an individual. Though | there's a cap on how much you can buy per year. | canadiantim wrote: | BlackRock, foxes and hen house | jcampbell1 wrote: | BlackRock has been promoting ESG, and Larry Fink has been | aggressively defending it publicly. ESG is questionably | compatible with being a fiduciary. What really bothers me about | Fink is that BlackRock has been buying up every ESG consulting | shop, and selling corporations on ESG and implicitly dangling | capital injections as a carrot. I sincerely hope this strategy | backfires. | mushufasa wrote: | here's the direct link | https://www.blackrock.com/corporate/literature/whitepaper/bi... | stareatgoats wrote: | > Central banks are deliberately causing recession by | overtightening policy to tame inflation, in our view. | | I didn't read the whole report, but a cursory glance revealed the | above quote in the lede. Which seems interesting to me, that one | of the largest (maybe the largest?) investment management firms | in the world has a different take on inflation taming than | central banks. Maybe it's only natural; they see a willed | recession on the horizon which will obviously hurt their bottom | line. | | Maybe they don't even have an alternative strategy, but I'm | personally wondering if hiking interest rates on top of soaring | energy prices is really the best we can come up with. Is it? | RC_ITR wrote: | It's a matter of different incentives. | | The Fed is _trying_ to reduce prices in asset markets. | | Asset prices growing faster than our ability to make things is | a sure-fire cause of inflation (more stock-based billionaires | chasing the same amount of houses makes all house prices go up, | as an extreme example). | | Blackrock just wants to have as many assets under management as | possible (that's how they make money), and one easy way to | goose that number is to have your existing assets go up in | price (and vice versa for falling prices). | | So yeah, Blackrock is rightly mad at the Fed and will probably | say a lot of mean things about them. | | Doesn't mean the Fed isn't doing the right thing though. | nly wrote: | It's not billionaires pushing up house prices but the middle | class .. like me | | I'm in the top 1% of UK salaried income and a family home is | not affordable in an area I'm willing to commute from. | | To buy a family home I'd be paying almost as much as a whole | year of the UK annual after-tax s just in stamp duty | (transaction tax). | | Things have gotten out of hand. | mistrial9 wrote: | if a person with access to much more credit than you, and | has more cash than you, is competing with you to get a | house when there are not many houses, how can you be the | cause of the increase in price? | | secondly, if the entire house market is so over-priced that | only people that have a house to sell, and new cash, and | substantial access to credit are the ones getting any house | at all, how is the cause of the price rise the buyer? | | thirdly, if the total capital in the system has been | multiplied by QE and network effects on assets, such that | you the middle-class buyer are not able to afford even a | bid, how is that the result of the middle-class house | buyer? | majormajor wrote: | Top 1% of income isn't middle class. | | Lot of folks in the top 1% who have a lot of equities | investments - those get inflated, makes it easier to borrow | more, pours gas on bidding wars. | nly wrote: | High income has nothing to do with class or wealth. | Scoundreller wrote: | Arguably, if you have to go to work for money and need | loans to buy shelter, you're not upper class. | [deleted] | jakeinspace wrote: | I don't believe you're middle class mate. Though I realize | that the British definition is more grounded in upbringing | and family history than the American usage. | osrec wrote: | Upper middle class may be more accurate. | wwweston wrote: | Blackrock is, of course, free to start making things, or to | increase their assets by buying from people who are. | FridgeSeal wrote: | Ppppphhh meaningfully contribute instead of just leeching | out passing value like some kind of parasite??? What a | crazy idea. | Scoundreller wrote: | Can't do A in a suit, and can't do B when outflows are your | problem and nobody will loan you their money for free to | buy more stuff. | HDThoreaun wrote: | This is pretty much the same view central banks have, just | stated from a different perspective. Inflation happens when | demand outpaces supply, so to curb it you either increase | supply or reduce demand. Central banks control monetary policy | which really only affects demand, so when they want to lower | inflation they cause less goods to be demanded by increasing | unemployment. | mdcds wrote: | Just something to think about: Fed Funds rate follows the | 2-year treasury with a lag. | | What BlackRock calls "deliberately causing recession", I would | call "following the signal from the bond market" | | Chart: | https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=%24UST2Y&p=W&b=1&g=0&id=p4... | mdcds wrote: | Actually, the relationship with 6-month treasury is even | stronger: | | https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=%24UST6M&p=W&b=1&g=0&id=p1. | .. | kitrose wrote: | This is all circular because the treasuries are being priced | based on the expectation of the rate changes. | keewee7 wrote: | BlackRock is an investment management firm that sells index | funds. They want a bullish market but with just enough | uncertainty and doubt that investors pick their index funds | instead of hand picking stocks. | | Governments and central banks have other incentives than | BlackRock. For governments temporary recession is better than a | state of long-term high inflation. | tdullien wrote: | I don't think that they have a different take than the central | banks, but the central banks don't advertise openly how | interest rate hikes "tame inflation". | | In the end, you cannot have any durable inflation without wage | increases - supply shocks can cause temporary inflation, but | long-term you need a cycle of wage increases that lead to price | hikes to perpetuate inflation. | | The way that tightening policy tames inflation is by choking | off enough of the economy to ensure that demand for labor is | reduced to the point where labor no longer has bargaining power | to obtain wage increases. | | This is clear to anyone that follows economics, but it's | sufficiently inflammatory that it's not expressed in plain | language. You tame inflation by tanking the economy just enough | so that employees lose their bargaining power, and hopefully | not more - but you can't achieve that without creating a | certain level of unemployment, otherwise employees keep their | bargaining power. | shaburn wrote: | Considering these guys are paid to do virtually nothing managing | capital and are being blindsided by ESG backlash, you may want to | take their report with a shaker of salt. | cschmidt wrote: | I find it kind of strange that the products many of us have our | money in are so static. I use the Schwab robo-advisor. It re- | balances to a target allocation. But moving to high inflation | regime with a recession on the horizon, with the fed hiking | rates, and absolutely nothing changes in my portfolio. | | They are doing tactical over- and under-weighting of sectors and | asset classes in this report. What can retail investors invest in | that does the same thing as the big guys? | jonwinstanley wrote: | Presumably they are reducing your risk to ensure your money is | safe? | cschmidt wrote: | No not all. They rebalance only to get you back to a target | allocation. I think that's true of virtually all robo | advisors, and many human advisors too. | tdullien wrote: | Robo advisors don't model interest rates at all. They | essentially just estimate volatility of asset classes and do a | round of Markowitz Portfolio optimization; they are easy to | build (it takes a few days only). There is very little smarts | behind them. | | They exist because in the past, private banks wealth management | would charge customers 2% of assets per year for running the | optimizer once a month (which made sense in the 1970s when only | banks had computers big enough to do it). | cschmidt wrote: | So what is a better alternative for a retail investor to do | top level portfolio optimization? | candyman wrote: | These guys are legacy. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-12-08 23:00 UTC)