[HN Gopher] WordPress testing official SQLite Support ___________________________________________________________________ WordPress testing official SQLite Support Author : ethanpil Score : 38 points Date : 2022-12-16 21:36 UTC (1 hours ago) (HTM) web link (github.com) (TXT) w3m dump (github.com) | c0nsumer wrote: | This'd be great. I'm curious about performance, of course, but | for personal blogs without comments, coupled with a caching | module... This could be great. | | One thing I'm still trying to suss out is how to have Apache host | Wordpress and stuff via HTTP/2. Wordpress which needs PHP which | requires mpm_prefork, which precludes mod_http2. Guess I should | just proxy WP to another instance of Apache or some other | httpd...? | jcoby wrote: | Take a look at php-fpm. It works with all the major servers and | let's them do what they do best and offloads the php requests | to php when needed. It also has better caching and overall | performance than mod_php since it's a long running daemon. | adobrawy wrote: | For people who are wondering if SQLite is the right database for | Wordpress, I recommend taking a look at | https://www.sqlite.org/whentouse.html where SQLite authors | explains what sites it makes sense for. | | In short: for most of Wordpress deployment, especially for long | tail of hair salons, car dealerships, personal blogs and other | non-tech SME sites | brian_herman wrote: | Awesome. | blacksmith_tb wrote: | That's excellent, I have been sad to see Ghost lose support for | SQLite[1]. I have been running a blog on it for years, works | great. | | 1: https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/issues/14446 | danjoredd wrote: | Is there any reason to want to use SQLite for Wordpress? Its | always great to have more options, but Im unclear as to why | someone would use that instead of MySQL | upon_drumhead wrote: | Complexity? I have a small site that would run just fine with | SQLite. I'd switch over in a heartbeat. | TrueSlacker0 wrote: | Complexity? MySQL 1 click installs on damn near every | WordPress install. I fail to see how it is complex. | rchaud wrote: | Someone's never seen a WP white screen of death because of | some esoteric MySQL error the average person will have no | idea how to debug. | dharmab wrote: | Keeping it updated and backed up is complex. Sqlite can be | embedded inside an application (easy updates) and the | database backup is a single file. | LVB wrote: | Zero clicks is better. And less resource usage, which can | help on really small instances with multiple applications. | pstuart wrote: | I'm curious as to how much of your site _depends_ on | WordPress, vs. just using a static site generator. | Veen wrote: | MySQL is a bit of a faff for the average person who wants to | self-host WordPress. SQLite can be made more user friendly. | Plus, MySQL is more expensive to host. | jchulce wrote: | SQLite would bring simpler installs, reduced administration | needs, and a decreased attack surface. | ergonaught wrote: | Resource usage on a default MySQL install today is quite | outrageous relative to what is needed for a typical blog. | fpoling wrote: | For a VM with a couple of wordpress blogs that I administer | SQLight should allow to reduce memory from 4 to 2GB. In | addition the blogs will no longer share the database improving | security (while the blogs has the same Wordpress version the | plug-in set is different, so a vulnerability in one is not | necessary affects another). | nix23 wrote: | Because 99% of Wordpress installations would be much better of | without any sql database, aka something like a git backend. | pacifika wrote: | Portable WordPress | rchaud wrote: | This is at least a decade overdue. I've moved my personal | site to Pico CMS (flat-file) for precisely this reason. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-12-16 23:00 UTC)