[HN Gopher] Corviale, a one-kilometer residential complex in Rome ___________________________________________________________________ Corviale, a one-kilometer residential complex in Rome Author : thunderbong Score : 63 points Date : 2022-12-17 17:15 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.archdaily.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.archdaily.com) | sushimako wrote: | Similarly, there is the "Karl Marx Hof"; a social housing complex | in Vienna that was completed in 1930 and spans 1.1km, with a huge | park in its midst. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl-Marx-Hof | | https://goo.gl/maps/E1PvcZahSPVjk4RY9 | patricktlo wrote: | Great video on it: https://youtu.be/vzGnyqpvwG8 | squarefoot wrote: | Being myself from Rome, I know that complex and have been several | times there in the past, also in the late 90s knew a girl who | lived there. That's a place you definitely don't want to roam | alone in the night. | stevenwoo wrote: | How much bigger is this than the Haussmann style buildings in | Paris and Barcelona? | cavanhorn wrote: | This already reminded me of Pruitt-Igoe BEFORE I read this. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pruitt%E2%80%93Igoe | reillyse wrote: | I think this is amazing. Not every attempt to solve housing | problems will be a hit but we have to try or else we'll never | succeed. Hopefully the next round of solutions will learn from | these attempts. | | I will say that it might seem contradictory but really high | density housing with adequate services (grocery,medical,school) | is actually lower impact than huge sprawl. Sure the impact on | that one kilometer is dramatic but in a suburban sprawl situation | the land use for the same number of residences/units is going to | be orders of magnitude higher. Even the transport links might use | more land than the the land used. I'm thinking large city streets | and freeways, that's a lot of real estate. | thriftwy wrote: | Compared to the Soviet approach to housing this is not entirely | impressive. | | Take, for example, more than one "round houses" with around 200m | diameter of one building. | | https://yandex.ru/maps/org/krugly_dom_na_nezhinskoy/70861302... | RcouF1uZ4gsC wrote: | Reminds me of the Apple Spaceship campus. | thriftwy wrote: | Only several decades earlier. This one is surrounded by six | school buildings and three kindergardens (of course there are | some other apartment buildings there as well). | | Like a CPU that is surrounded by a troop of supporting chips. | | I wonder which schools do kids of Corviale attend. Around it | I can see all kind of stuff but only one school. Do they all | fit? | | Despite being a huge apartment complex, it seems very car- | centric. | baq wrote: | See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falowiec in Poland. | kgeist wrote: | The building on the photo reminds me of the "lying skyscraper" in | Moscow (0.7 km): https://9gag.com/gag/a8MQwNp | mertd wrote: | Reminds me of The Line, the city Saudis claim to be building. | epolanski wrote: | They don't claim it, they started building it. | | Anyway looking Arab countries is like looking at everything | that's wrong with modern world. | | Imagine being so rich you can build any kind of city and you | choose to build Dubais, Dohas and this line. | | You could literally build fascinating Arabian-style fascinating | cities that would make a Disney movie look bad...and they | decide to create such non sense monsters like palm islands (not | practical, doomed to be sunk by raising oceans moreover) or | lines in the desert, pointless skyscrapers in places where | there's no lack of horizontal space, this ain't Manhattan ffs. | jsnell wrote: | One more in the same theme: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prora | | What I've never understood with these projects is, what's the | supposed benefit of a single stupidly large building over a large | number of reasonably sized ones? It doesn't feel like this would | bring any meaningful economies of scale to the building process. | It seems unlikely to actually use land more efficiently. | | Like, is it really just some kind of an authoritarian fetish for | giant projects, or was there at least some attempt at justifying | it? | marci wrote: | What do you mean by efficiency of land usage? | | The only thing I could think of is surface area and, compared | to "a large number of reasonably sized ones", this obviously | would be more efficient. | | I see them as skyscrappers in landscape mode. | retube wrote: | "The Line" has entered the chat | IshKebab wrote: | Yeah I can't see much point either. I think it's just one of | those things architects and urban planners do sometimes because | it's interesting and unusual, not because it's good. | | Another example is guided busways. Inferior to a road in every | respect but that isn't enough to stop them. | | I guess I shouldn't single out architects and urban planners - | probably every field has projects that a back of the envelope | calculation shows are obviously a terrible idea but they go | ahead anyway. Solar roadways. Space based power. | | The issue with architects doing it is that buildings stick | around for a long time and people have to actually live in | them, so I feel justified in reserving special resentment for | modern architects. | hutzlibu wrote: | "probably every field has projects that a back of the | envelope calculation shows are obviously a terrible idea but | they go ahead anyway. Solar roadways" | | Solar roadways for example are only a terrible idea, as long | as sturdy solar panels remains expensive, and there is lots | of other unused area to be covered much more cheaply. That | might change one day, but yes, until then it is an idea from | people who are too lazy to do the basic math. | IshKebab wrote: | It won't change one day. If we exhaust all better locations | for solar panels than roads then we will already have | enough solar energy to power the world many times over. | Almost anywhere is better than a road. | codewiz wrote: | In Japan, clusters of identical buildings were constructed | around the same period of Corviale: | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danchi | | These communities also didn't age too well, becoming associated | with aging population, urban degradation and poor architecture. | jasonwatkinspdx wrote: | This was one of the big failures of modernism and related | architectural schools. | | Being charitable, the thinking at the time was somewhat | mechanistic: that you could build utopic urban environments | from first principles as massive campuses vs individual | buildings. | | Inevitable these projects underestimated the organic and | evolutionary complexity of urban environments. No single design | team organized by some maestro can come close to anticipating | and designing around all the needs of an urban neighborhood. | | But on the other hand, these mega projects were a simple story | to sell politically. Look, we're being bold and thinking big, | we're going to actually address problems in housing supply vs | kicking the can down the road, etc. Someone else saying they | needed to think in terms of flexible zoning and a variety of | tax incentives looks not nearly so compelling. | | Today we look back on these projects differently, because the | failure of "housing projects" in the US, UK, and elsewhere are | a familiar meme almost, so people are much more skeptical about | mega projects working out. | ghaff wrote: | One interesting aspect of how many people view urban planning | is that a lot of urbanists like to point to the like of Jane | Jacobs who (correctly IMO) opposed a lot of centralized | planning, especially with respect to roads. At the same time, | she favored organic and community-oriented development which | I suspect a lot of people today would consider NIMBY and | would mostly be opposed to large-scale housing developments. | She did live in the West Village after all. | Barrin92 wrote: | I don't buy the failure narrative at all. In a lot of Eastern | European and also to an extent Western European cities large | housing projects work reasonably well especially for lower | income households, they've kept rents affordable, they're | energy efficient and they aided in rapid urbanisation. | | Many of them don't look great but they pretty much did their | job given the limited resources that a lot of cities had | available. | | If you look at modernist cities around the world, in India | for example as well, cities that took inspiration from this | kind of planning have generally good standards of living, | costs, little homelessness and decent environmental | footprints. | forgotusername6 wrote: | In less hospitable climates this kind of giant building has its | place. No need to go outside in the freezing cold or scorching | heat. | ksherlock wrote: | In Whittier Alaska, (pop: 275-300 or so), most folks live in | the Begich Towers which was a former Army building. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whittier,_Alaska | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begich_Towers | wardedVibe wrote: | If you haven't read "Seeing like a State" I think you would | find it quite interesting. There was a period where urban | planners thought that they could, starting from first | principles, design the perfect urban environment. It wasn't | just authoritarians doing it, but those were the places most | able to continue to execute on a vision and disregard the | pushback. | rob74 wrote: | Well, if you are going to try to build affordable housing | quickly, such large projects are the way to go. At least in the | sixties and seventies city planners in the "western world" | tried to do it (with more or less success), today they're not | even trying anymore. | | A more successful example is the former Munich Olympic Village | (https://goo.gl/maps/1HTQWvGcRcoXAWvH6). It's composed of 3 | streets which are completely built over, so the cars at ground | level are hidden from view and the pedestrians are walking in a | completely pedestrian area at level 2 (I think). The buildings | are also very linear and all look the same, but all apartments | have huge south-facing terraces with lots of greenery | (including shrubs or even trees). Public transport connection | is also very good with a subway station nearby. Today the | apartments are very sought after - wish they had built more | projects like this. But if you look at more recent projects, | like the "Messestadt Riem" | (https://goo.gl/maps/tVrahc4uDFkijGCC9), they are much more | cramped and spread out over a larger surface, with squat | buildings that look very interchangeable - not really better, | I'm afraid. | bombcar wrote: | If you're a politician or other approver you want something big | and bold to put your name on. Authorizing building a bunch of | normal buildings is boring - anyone could do that! | pmontra wrote: | Nobody lost an election because they were inspired by Le | Corbusier. But they should. | nwatson wrote: | Also here, last photo | https://www.google.com/amp/s/bernadetealves.com/2020/06/12/u... | , the 700-meter Minhocao (Big Worm) at UnB (Universidade | Nacional de Brasilia). I started EE program there in 1984 | before deciding to move to the USA (student/teacher strikes | were gonna lead to lost semesters). Going between classes was | real inconvenient. | hankman86 wrote: | These buildings are basically an anti-individualism ideology, | cast in concrete. Which is why far left and far right regimes | alike like to erect such structures. | | And it's not even a thing of the past. In its most recent | incarnation, the German Greens have declared war on single | family homes. The fashionable justification being their carbon | footprint. Instead, they are for policies to house people in | apartment blocks that are densely spaced within cities instead | of suburbs. Often while mixing different demographics that | would not normally like to live within the same neighbourhood. | Suffice it to say that people continue to pursue the dream of | owning houses on their own plot of land. | ohyoutravel wrote: | This sounds like a speech you rehearsed for a San Francisco | HOA meeting to keep more housing out of your neighborhood to | keep your property values up. | ajsnigrutin wrote: | If you live in (or near) a city center, you'll live in a | large apartment building. If you want a single family house, | you move outside the city center. You cannot have an urban | city environment, with restaurants, bars, stores and walkable | streets if you only have single family buildings with yards | there. | | There is a place for everything, houses and large buildings. | | Otherwise, I agree with the comment above, that such | buildings seem impractical, and can be replaced with separate | buildings, even higher, with open space in between them (and | greens and parks and benches,...), eg: | https://goo.gl/maps/TneCupaRNq3SgQYL7 (imagine this, but with | undeground parking instead of cars parked on the steet). | groestl wrote: | Also here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl-Marx-Hof | flandish wrote: | As a firefighter, I can't imagine trying to get ladders or an | aerial into those middle sections, should it be needed. | | I hope a diff angle would show easier access. | worik wrote: | Can you not just park a truck in the road? How is it different | from a normal ten (?) story building? | | Do you need 360 degree access? | newaccount2021 wrote: | the building is literally right beside a road, just park your | truck where you need to put up the ladder... | | not that anyone in Rome would want you to put out a fire there, | I'm sure they are all praying an earthquake will relieve them | of this brutalist masterpiece | jasonwatkinspdx wrote: | I'd hazard a guess that a professional fire fighter is better | at judging the challenges here than rando hnews posters... so | perhaps you could ask for what you're missing instead of | being so dismissive? | skybrian wrote: | Odd that it's so euphemistic about the people living there. Seems | like there should be interviews? | WilTimSon wrote: | First thing I thought of was how much of a nightmare this would | be for food delivery and general navigation for anyone, who isn't | familiar with the building. Otherwise, kind of a curious idea, | though I don't think I'd want to live in one. Always preferred | more compact buildings. | agilob wrote: | Can't imagine being there in lockdown for months | logifail wrote: | > Can't imagine being there in lockdown for months | | We are friends with two separate Italian families who | struggled with Covid lockdowns. | | The first family live in Florence and were stuck in a tiny | apartment with two young girls and weren't even allowed to | use their building's communal (but private) garden. Fresh air | was to be found only on their balcony. | | The second family live in central Milan, and on the | announcement of the first lockdown, fled to an extended | family member's house in the countryside, far from the city. | The parents described it to the (young) kids as "the | unexpected holiday". They ended up ordering toys and bicycles | online once it turned out the lockdown wasn't just going to | be a couple of weeks. | | My primary concern about our overall response to Covid is | that next time around - and there will definitely be a next | time - there will be substantially more suspicion (and hence | less compliance), and that doesn't end well. | goodpoint wrote: | If anything it's much easier. | newaccount2021 wrote: | [deleted] | cm2187 wrote: | Don't do to other what you don't want done to you. I wonder how | many architects actually live in those monstruosities. | omnibrain wrote: | Reminds me of the "Unite d'habitation" | | A few years ago, we visited (the fields of) Verdun and stayed in | Briey. A medium size (~5000p) village in the middle between Metz | and Verdun. While driving we overlooked the fields and saw this | huge out of place futuristic building. That's how I learned of | the "Unite d'habitation". | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit%C3%A9_d%27habitation | cgeier wrote: | You can find it here on google maps: | https://www.google.com/maps/place/00148+Corviale+Metropolita... ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-12-17 23:00 UTC)