[HN Gopher] Lionel Messi Is Impossible (2014) ___________________________________________________________________ Lionel Messi Is Impossible (2014) Author : wallflower Score : 277 points Date : 2022-12-18 15:07 UTC (7 hours ago) (HTM) web link (fivethirtyeight.com) (TXT) w3m dump (fivethirtyeight.com) | smhg wrote: | When I navigate back to HN after reading the article, I get a | page 'more stories before you go'. At least the first time I | opened the link. | | How is 538 able to intercept my navigation away from their page? | xwdv wrote: | JavaScript | MrPatan wrote: | JavaScript doesn't make websites shitty, people make websites | shitty. | noirbot wrote: | Sure, but the question was "how do they do this" not "why | would they do this" | dclowd9901 wrote: | Specifically, in Javascript you can superficially push a | navigated state into the location stack so that when the user | presses the back button, it is now the inserted page instead of | the "actual" one. Most FE devs consider this a dark pattern and | refuse to implement it. | | That said, it's basically just the front end's version of a | redirect. Unfortunately it's been used a lot especially by | malware sites to basically jail people into their site. | fyzix wrote: | I think google should factor this in pagerankings. Might be the | only thing that can force change | rvr_ wrote: | https://www.w3schools.com/jsref/event_onbeforeunload.asp | graderjs wrote: | No, it wouldn't be that. That can only prevent unload if it | throws a native modal up (cousin of alert, confirm, prompt, | etc). | | I think what they must have done is push some URL to the | history state, using the History API, to fuck with the back | and forward buttons, enabling them to intercept when you | navigate back, by having added an additional page in there, | that you never visited, but that they can use to serve you | this interstitial. | | Just my 2c | smhg wrote: | I'm baffled any half decent site would use that. I expected | some kind of new web/Chrome API. | | That's a very "bold" choice of 538 if you ask me. | usmannk wrote: | It's not that, they're pushing the "before you go" page to | the history stack. https://developer.mozilla.org/en- | US/docs/Web/API/History/pus... | | You can see it if you right click the back button after | navigating to the article. | kmonsen wrote: | I feel like every site is doing it these days. Wonder if | browsers should start blocking it. | balaji1 wrote: | who else is here at half time? | Darmody wrote: | I stopped watching it after the penalty. | | This is not football, it's geopolitics. | xenospn wrote: | Did geopolitics make France not kick a single ball at the | goal for 70 minutes? | Darmody wrote: | No, it's because they play like crap. | | I'm not defending France or anything. I dislike both teams, | my team got eliminated a while ago. | | But take a look at Argentina - Croatia. Argentina was way | superior after the first 20 min or so, but Croatia was | still holding. After the penalty Croatia was no longer | playing football. When Argentina scored the second goal the | defense was scared of even approaching the ball. A penalty | in a tournament like this can kill the morale easily. | phlakaton wrote: | I think you are mistaking hard physical play with | geopolitics. An understandable mistake! They look so | similar. ;-) | barrenko wrote: | This happened all the time with Barcelona and Messi in | the "golden" years. He's still a great player, but... | ither should be allowed to play against fairly. | cryptonector wrote: | There needs to be a better way to deal with fouls "in the | area". | amelius wrote: | > This is not football, it's geopolitics. | | I often compare it to medicine, where a football match is a | drug that is tested with a randomized controlled trial with | N=1. | | If football matches had a p-value for "the best team won", it | would be abominable. | pelasaco wrote: | I'm not sure if you are french or german, but both teams, | together with netherlands, were those that profit at most | from geopolitics in football. | Darmody wrote: | I'm neither of those. | | Also I'm talking about Qatar here, not Argentina or France. | subpixel wrote: | I felt the penalty was a gift from the sponsors but kept | watching. France almost overcame that thumb on the scales, | and I'm glad I didn't tune out. | | Still, it's an egregious shame and it tarnishes the win. | whoevercares wrote: | Geopolitics that is in favor of Argentina?? That does not | make any sense. | | I would buy that story if it were for China - look at all the | ads and they even built the stadium. Too fantasy though since | China men's soccer team is a total joke | boomboomsubban wrote: | FIFA very possibly wants Argentina to win, not for | geopolitical reasons but to sell the Messi legend more. | [deleted] | balaji1 wrote: | Yes. Maybe there is greater commercial value of a Messi + | Argentina win. But then now (at 81'), it seems they | haven't made up their mind. 2-2. | cryptonector wrote: | The longer people watch the game, the better, no? | galgot wrote: | It's not about France or Argentina. It's about the PSG, a | club owned by Qatar (buye... ahem... host of the world | cup), where both Messi and Mbappe plays. | Darmody wrote: | More in favour of Qatar. | | They spend 10 times more than the other countries to host | the world cup. They want it to be a big hit. That's why | FIFA has been saying that this is the best wold cup ever | and bla bla bla. | whoevercares wrote: | Ok that looks like game gambling and manipulation much | more than geopolitics. Not surprised if Qatar has a fair | share there | Darmody wrote: | It's Qatar playing geopolitics. They didn't spend $200+ | billion because they love football. | | They want something big to show the world. What better | than having one of the best players ever win a world cup | before retiring? | | That's how I see it. | phlakaton wrote: | One of the best players in the game was going to win no | matter which side won. This looked like a pretty fairly- | called contest to me. | | But hey, even a 7-1 beatdown of the favorites can make | for a memorable and entertaining World Cup. | NhanH wrote: | In 2018 there was 29 penalties in total. This year there is | 17 penalties during the matches (including the final so | far), with Argentina getting 5 out of 17. | | It is unusual enough to let people wonder. | kaesar14 wrote: | Doesn't seem unusual that a top team would get more | penalties | balaji1 wrote: | True. And reckless challenges seem to be going up in | general. | | Did someone count the number of cards and penalties | against Arsenal last season? | koolba wrote: | That's meaningless without a denominator. All other | things being equal, the team with more time spent in the | opponents box would be expected to have more penalty | kicks. | | EDIT: And just as I write this France draws a penalty! | NhanH wrote: | I have no horse in this fight, just wanted to point out a | curious fact. | | That said, the denominator/ top team argument only holds | if Argentina was the most dominant team in the cup by a | landslide (considering the ratio of the total penalties). | They weren't, they performed mostly in the same pack of | France/England/ Portugal. Brazil would be the only team | that was blatantly more dominant. Another denominator | could potentially be number of foul against, and I would | be surprised if it is that lopsided. | whoevercares wrote: | What the hell!!!! It's a draw now | arrrg wrote: | FIFA has a product that is a glittering diamond for ascending | or old (authoritarian) regimes irrespective of whether FIFA | exerts any influence on the content itself (the games). That | just doesn't matter and also isn't necessary so why should | they even try to touch that? Makes no rational sense. | | FIFA's job is to get the teams that make the glittering | diamond to play in the WC without too much fuss and without | making any problems. In that context doing shady shit on the | playfield would even be counterproductive. | | If all (important) national teams feel like the games | themselves are fair and that they are heard when there are | problems on the playfield then at least that's not an | additional area of conflict. | | For that reason I think it's extremely unlikely for | corruption to actually extend to the playfield. It's just no | needed and even counterproductive. I think that might | actually be the thing that actually breaks FIFA's power, so I | would think that they don't touch it. | cbrozefsky wrote: | Dembele is one of my favorites, but when you get beat like he | did and then tangle legs from behind, that is going to get | called every time. | pelasaco wrote: | this second penalty was - however - a mistake. | Darmody wrote: | You can watch the replay as many times as you want and you | won't see Dembele touching Di Maria until he's already on | the floor. | kaesar14 wrote: | And yet France just got away with a blatant handball. | Geopolitics indeed. | Mikeb85 wrote: | You talking about the one that was way outside the box | and going out of bounds anyway? | kaesar14 wrote: | France lost with two penalties given. Get over it. | Mikeb85 wrote: | I mean, they've won twice in my lifetime and I watched | both. It's ok. Just trying to figure out what you were | watching? | larksimian wrote: | He touches his back foot while Di Maria is still running. | BBC commentators all also agreed it was a clear pen(and | I'm romanian just to dispel political bias hopefully). | | Di Maria just destroyed that flank this game. | mrtksn wrote: | The Argentina penalty or the France penalty? | balaji1 wrote: | @Darmody, if only you had used a word like "commerce" or | "business" instead of "geopolitics". This match and WC seems | like good business. Also I'm not entertained but that was | their intention I guess. | Darmody wrote: | It's business for FIFA, geopolitics for Qatar. | | This is the money spent on the last world cups. | | QAT (2022) US$229 billion[1] | | RUS (2018) US$16 billion[2] | | BRA (2014) US$19.7 billion[3] | | RSA (2010) US$7.2 billion[4] | | GER (2006) US$4.9(EUR3.7) billion[5] | | KOR/ JPN (2002) US$7 billion[6] | | FRA (1998) US$2.33 billion[7] | | USA (1994) US$500.00 million[8] | | ITA (1990) US$4 billion[9] | | Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economics_of_the_FIFA | _World_Cu... | chrisweekly wrote: | WOW!! That is extraordinary. I had no idea. Curious what | 2026 will look like. | peregren wrote: | Can you explain the relationship between the penalty and | geopolitics? | sanman811 wrote: | Might want to start rewatching. Geopolitics be darned | pelasaco wrote: | now better stop to watch it again.. Argentinian geopolitics | at full power here :) | mellosouls wrote: | checking in | susrev wrote: | yup! | nodra wrote: | Here to watch the Argentinian flop fest | nkzd wrote: | Haha, right here! | xenospn wrote: | So exciting! | hamparawa wrote: | hello! | benrmatthews wrote: | Hola! | mromanuk wrote: | Me! | samwillis wrote: | This was submitted at the start of the match, but didn't get | any comments till half time, quite telling. (currently 13 | comments 10min into half time) | | I wander what a vote count over time graph looks like for this | post. I assume everyone is going to disappear again in 5 min. | | (also here during half time) | | Edit: 20 comments at second half kick off. | maguirre wrote: | Looking for a dopamine hit :) | mromanuk wrote: | I was trying to clear my mind from the match, but the world | clip and our hero Messi is everywhere, even in HN | pelasaco wrote: | Me! Looks like this comment from Mbappe will age like Milk | https://twitter.com/espnfc/status/1529214154015395842?lang=e... | | EDIT: OR maybe not LOL.. France is just physically too | strong... Technically? Meh. | ianmcgowan wrote: | Aged like milk indeed :-) | pelasaco wrote: | Not sure, what I should write here now, LOL.. let me wait | 10 more minutes :) | samwillis wrote: | Not looking that clear cut now... | pookah wrote: | Haven't watched soccer in 20 years. Watched two teams in Europe | kick a ball mid field for what felt like four hours. | | Thank god for Patrick Mahomes... | bandyaboot wrote: | It would be immensely fun as a layperson to go up against Messi | just to see how many seconds of trying to separate the ball from | his possession I could go before I've tripped over my own feet | and am laughing hysterically at the sheer magic of what he's able | to do. | faitswulff wrote: | I think it would be more fun to match him against an entire | team of laypeople. Any single individual wouldn't even be able | to see him. | rvba wrote: | Since every Messi thread somehow ends up with Ronaldo, there | is a video where Ronaldo is "smurfing" disguised with a fake | beard: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68E53lcUIKE The video | is not really that interesting. | | As for "entire team playing against a team of laypeople" - I | would like to see something like this too. Best we can have | is probably the match between American Samoa and Australia | that ended 0-31 | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wg9ox9F7Vw | xcambar wrote: | Messi or any other pro player doesn't really make a difference | if it's against the average person. | | Average Joe/Jane just doesn't get to touch the ball. Period. | elorant wrote: | I used to play semi pro volleyball in late puberty. We had a | quite nice school team and we were second in regional | championship which was taking place in the largest city of the | country. One day while we were having a workout a friend of our | coach showed up who was playing in the national team so we | asked him to participate. Dude was willing to do so and from | the way he played it was obvious he wasn't really trying. So at | one point he's on the offensive and I jump to block him which I | did. The one thing I remember even three decades later is just | how much my palms hurt. Both my hands had gone numb. There was | a lot of cheer and he came alongside to congratulate me, but | all I was thinking at the moment was fuck this hurts so much. I | can't even imagine how it would feel had he gone full force | while hitting the ball, although I seriously doubt I could have | blocked it if he did. | | A layman person can't realize how vast the gap is between | him/her and a pro player, let alone elite players. My guess is | that you wouldn't even have the time to react because he's so | agile he can change direction in a fraction of a second. You | wouldn't trip and fall, you'd simply stood still and by the | time you'd register what happened he'd be ten feet behind you. | permo-w wrote: | on top of this the fact that football has an order of | magnitude larger talent pool than volleyball | didip wrote: | He did it. He won. The ultimate GOAT! He finally got it before | retirement! | | I will remember this game for a long time. The dramatic twists | and turns are so memorable. | soheil wrote: | Better believe it!! | divbzero wrote: | Related: | | _An analysis of Lionel Messi_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7972815 - July 2014 (129 | comments) | quirino wrote: | There's a subreddit called r/toprightmessi which is a collection | of graphs showing how much Messi excels in so many respects. | Crazy how in the biggest sport in the world there can be a player | so far above and beyond the rest. | MichaelZuo wrote: | Is there anyone else in the sporting world that's such a | statistical outlier? | amenghra wrote: | Most athletes who are at the top of their sport when they | reach age ~40 tend to be crazy outliers. I'm thinking Michael | Schumacher (F1), Tom Brady (NFL), Roger Federer (tennis), | etc. | walthamstow wrote: | They are outliers because it's a brand new phenomenon. This | generation has the first sportsmen to push 40 in a lot of | sports, beit Federer, James Anderson, Brady, Ibrahimovic. | It will become quite common as time goes on I expect. | | p.s. Schumacher drove a car, so I'm not sure he is a fair | comparison to physical sportsmen | Daneel_ wrote: | Your postscript is a bit unfair to racing drivers - it's | actually an incredibly physically demanding sport. | shakesbeard wrote: | Don Bradman in Cricket. | | Apparently, a good batting average for a modern-day batsman | is 40+ with those above 50 being exceptional. Bradman's | average was 99.94. The second highest average of all time is | 60.97. | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Bradman | nl wrote: | It's difficult to emphasize what a complete statistical | outlier Bradman is. | | As the parent poster points out, the next highest average | is in the low 60s (actually 61.87 now[1]). Looking at the | stats though, we see averages are roughly a normal curve, | centered on 40 with a standard deviation of a little over | 9[2]. This puts Bradman _over 6 standard deviations_ above | average! | | [1] https://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/records/28291 | 0.htm... | | [2] https://www.significancemagazine.com/sports/24-did-don- | bradm... | lordnacho wrote: | Gretzky is even more insane. Fun facts: | | If you don't count his goals, he still has more points than | the next guy. Points are goals plus assists. | | Something like 15 of the best 20 seasons in history by points | are him. | | Player of the year every year for a decade. | | The only thing that makes it look less spectacular is that | ice hockey is not the world's favourite sport. | | Messi is the goat of a game that is massively popular on | every continent, that you can find people playing in a park | in almost every city. | Enginerrrd wrote: | Wayne Gretzky! | Gunnerhead wrote: | Definitely Gretzky! | ndsipa_pomu wrote: | Alternatively, is it due to the ubiquity of soccer that | particularly gifted individuals can be developed into their | full potential? Someone that has a one-in-a-billion level of | skill in something like frisbee-golf is less likely to be | spotted and made into a professional player. | browningstreet wrote: | As a fan of disc golf I pained and laughed at "frisbee-golf". | The distribution of talent and accomplishment in professional | disc golf .. a relatively young sport .. wouldn't surprise | anyone here. | ndsipa_pomu wrote: | Apologies for any discomfort - I clearly should have put | "disc golf". | derbOac wrote: | This is the weird thing for me about some of these | discussions. I'm not going to question Messi's ability or | ability in general but I've always wondered how much | "extraindividual" factors start to play a role in those upper | tails that are incentivized. We talk about Messi like he's | just a marble sculpture handed down from God but that's not | the case. | | Looking at the figure, for example, one thing I noticed was | the gap between the two upper points and the rest. It's hard | for me to imagine there aren't some missing points there. | | In other fields or areas, I think you have to start asking | about things like fraud, other vice, or circumstances. | | As you suggest, there's probably also some unique things | about international football that make it difficult to | generalize to other things. Everything is probably a little | unique in certain ways really, but the incentives are so | extreme and the play is very visible. | Enginerrrd wrote: | One thing to note is that the stats in the article don't | appear to be normalized to me. It's just a lot of "# of X | since 2010". So, it makes sense that the best will be | played more often and get more play time to help drive the | separation greater. | Jenk wrote: | This is so true when looking at the distribution of top | olympic athletes Vs distribution of countries that invest in | developing said athletes in their chosen sport. | derbOac wrote: | Do you know of any sites offhand that discuss this? I can | look it up but wasn't sure if there were some you'd | recommend. The thing you're mentioning seems really | important as an example in these kinds of discussions. | emmelaich wrote: | And yet Mbappe is better paid - most valuable in the world it | is thought. | | And his WC Final rival and PSG team mate. | jacquesm wrote: | If you were to define some new sport from scratch tomorrow | morning by the end of the afternoon the Bell curve would start | to assert itself in those that chose to play in it and over | time that would become more and more evident. Eventually a | 'Messi' would turn up. | dan-robertson wrote: | You say bell curve, which I understand as meaning normally | distributed, but the point about Messi is that he is better | than what one would expect to find from normally distributed | ability. | | I think it is interesting to ask why Messi is such an | outlier. But maybe you think the fact that _someone_ has to | be best makes it all uninteresting. | jacquesm wrote: | I think that effect comes from soccer being somewhat multi- | dimensional: the ability to run fast, aim well, have | stamina and so on. | | And yes, I think that the fact that someone _will_ be the | best makes it uninteresting, or at least a lot less | interesting than if a skill could be universally taught to | the point where everybody would be very good at it and it | would be productive. | | Professional sports is roughly at the same level of | interest to me as a circus. | OscarCunningham wrote: | With fat-tailed distributions, increasing the sample size | actually makes it more likely that you'll get one element much | greater than the others. | SmooL wrote: | Yes, but if you have many fat tailed distributions, | increasing the sample size makes it increasingly less likely | that it's _the same person at the end each time_ | OscarCunningham wrote: | This would imply that there's a single factor upstream | leading to his exceptional ability in several measures | downstream. | cryptonector wrote: | https://medium.com/@casciari/messi-is-a-dog-18b8f32766c8 | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDsztJOgqUg | | TL;DR / TL;DW: Messi is a dog. The ball is _his_. | jonahx wrote: | Isn't the surprising part that it's fat-tailed rather than | normal? | 082349872349872 wrote: | keep in mind that even if football ability were | (untrainable and) normally distributed, the distribution of | ability among international players would be taken from one | of the tails of that bell. | jonahx wrote: | Also a good point. Do you know what the exact | distribution would be when sampling randomly and | rejecting all values below some threshold? You can tell | it would at least be Pereto-ish in general shape. | 082349872349872 wrote: | I can't do much with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trunca | ted_normal_distribution but maybe you can? | eloff wrote: | Why would it be? All careers with leverage seem to follow a | Pareto distribution. It would surprise me if any sport, | art, or creative endeavor was normally distributed. | jonahx wrote: | You're right. I was thinking the "initial talent" might | be normal in the way IQ scores are, but the parent was | talking about actual performance, where history, | training, etc all come into play. | | And empirically, you have Gretzky in hockey, Jordan in | basketball.... | eloff wrote: | I don't even think initial talent is normally | distributed. Take Usain Bolt, for example, he'd be a far | outlier in a Pareto distribution for sprinters just on | the basis of his natural heritage. | hgsgm wrote: | OscarCunningham wrote: | IQ is normally distributed because it's graded on a curve | to make that true by definition. I'm not sure how it's | distributed on any sort of 'natural' scale. | derbOac wrote: | No, it's scaled but linearly and not redistributed. | | There's still studies of relatively raw distributions and | it still looks normal. The biggest deviations from | normality are due to an excess mass in the lower range | due to disease, and a tendency for scores to spike a tiny | bit at certain numbers, probably due to people | administering the test fudging a bit sometimes for | various reasons. | jacquesm wrote: | What would such a natural scale look like? | derefr wrote: | Maybe a cross-species IQ score would be interesting. | Chimpanzees and corvids both can solve many IQ-test | problems, but also are not experiencing the Flynn effect | as far as we know. So we could measure IQ in multiples of | a chimp's IQ, just like we measure cars in multiple's of | a workhorse's sustainable pulling output. (Which is | actually a _less_ objective measure, when you think about | it; we were breeding workhorses to increase that very | target at the time the concept of "horsepower" was | invented!) | jacquesm wrote: | That would be a great start. And it would also force us | to acknowledge that a lot of the things that we are doing | with these animals are utterly un-ethical. | OscarCunningham wrote: | I'm reminded of the paper 'Measuring universal | intelligence: Towards an anytime intelligence test' https | ://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000437021.. | .. | jacquesm wrote: | Thank you for the pointer. | derefr wrote: | I suppose the distribution of aptitude would be a normal | distribution in a world where careers were assigned | randomly at birth and advancing in your career was on a | strict seniority basis. So, for example, you'd see it in | career paths that are mostly followed as generational | family businesses. | TreeRingCounter wrote: | This sounds like nonsense. We're talking about multivariate | distributions, and you haven't defined a norm by which | ordinal comparisons can be made between sample points. | brewmarche wrote: | All norms on finite-dimensional vector spaces are | equivalent so the choice of norm shouldn't matter for tails | really. | hgsgm wrote: | shkkmo wrote: | He's impossible, but not winning the golden boot anymore... | cryptonector wrote: | No one beats aging. But he's still amazing at 35. | axiom92 wrote: | Not to be a buzzkill, but being fooled by randomness is a thing | that should at least be mentioned here. Of course Taleb has more | to say on the matter in [1]. | | [1] https://www.amazon.in/Fooled-Randomness-Hidden-Chance- | Market... | nl wrote: | It's not obvious why you think this applies here. | | If statistics showing Messi is a great player were just random | we'd expect them to regress towards the mean. It's true that as | he ages they have a little, but if we compare him to players | who are also his age he remains a far outlier. | | And even against the world's best, in the a tournament that | matters (ie, this world cup) he ended up being the second | highest goal scorer, second highest assist giver, highest | chance creator and second highest dribble completer[1]. | | So yes, I'd like to understand how randomness applies here. | | [1] https://www.foxsports.com/soccer/2022-fifa-world-cup/stats | epivosism wrote: | He has had an interesting medical journey: | https://journeys.dartmouth.edu/marcanovicoff22/messis-medica... | rurban wrote: | The call him "greatest soccer player of all time", but then the | talk about Messi, not Maradona. Lol | whywhywhydude wrote: | Have you actually seen Messi play? | BeetleB wrote: | If you compare Messi's record with Maradona's, there's not | much to compare. The latter could have been the best of all | time, but he sabotaged his own career. | cryptonector wrote: | Messi is a better player than Maradona, and also a better | person. His humility makes him a lot more likable, what can I | say. IMO. | ardit33 wrote: | Messi is actually a jerk. He purposely wanted to sink | Lewandowski Ballon D'or nomination (which was well | deserved) by voting for a nobody. | smcl wrote: | Weirdly I think Maradona's chaotic life off the pitch (and | I suppose no shortage of controversy on it) sort of adds to | his appeal :) | eertami wrote: | Maybe the bar for "good person" is set too low, if | convicted tax frauds are considered good people. | sweettea wrote: | Messi's captured the hearts of the casual World Cup fan | unlike anyone else. I don't know a whole lot about soccer -- | more or less all I know is that the World Cup happens every | few years, is played by national teams, and Messi makes | impossible plays. What I do know is all because of Messi, | whose wholesome relatability and exceptional ability brings | casual viewers like me; I generally avoid sports because the | players are hard to relate to or have personal flaws, but I | love Messi's strong family roots. I would propose that merely | for being a truly exceptional face of the sport he's the | GOAT. | | Maybe Maradona was that way in his day -- I'm barely aware | that he was a good player of yesteryear -- but his drug | problems (and the fact that his heyday was so long ago) make | him much less relatable or exciting to investigate as a | inspiration. | fnord123 wrote: | > wholesome relatability | | Nice one. I think this post will go over most peoples' | heads but I had a good laugh. | andrepd wrote: | >Messi's captured the hearts of the casual World Cup fan | unlike anyone else. I don't know a whole lot about soccer | | How on earth do you reconcile these two sentences lol x) | qsort wrote: | Answers to "who is the GOAT" that won't upset hardcore | soccer fans are the exactly the following set: {Maradona, | Pele, Cruyff}. | Scarblac wrote: | Nah, Messi was already part of that set for many years, | and today he added the only thing missing in his career. | Messi is the sole GOAT. | cryptonector wrote: | Messi or Pele, then the other, and only then maybe | Maradona. | radiator wrote: | Ronaldo Luis Nazario de Lima | SSJPython wrote: | He would've been the GOAT had he stayed healthy. | Consistency and longevity are very important in this | debate. | radiator wrote: | Depends on the definition of GOAT. When he was at his | peak, he played the best football ever played. | | By the way, both Maradona and Messi when previously | asked, have answered something along the lines that that | he was the greatest. | kamarg wrote: | Health issues cutting his career short ensured he won't | be in consideration for most people. That said, he truly | was phenomenal. Absolutely one of the most amazing to | ever play the game. | ardit33 wrote: | Nah. I am C. Ronaldo fan. For many he was an inspiration as | well. CR7 was unlucky this WC, due to his manager's poor | decisions with the Morocco game. | bhrgunatha wrote: | > I'm barely aware that he was a good player of yesteryear | | As an English football fan, that cheered me up (it still | hurts). I suspect no English football fan could accept | Maradona as the greatest. | | Do you know about Pele? | | When I was a kid, it seems everyone (even non fans) knew | Pele was the greatest. | mayankkaizen wrote: | I am not interested in sports but when I was in my teens, | no other name was associated with any sport as was the | name of Pele with football. As you said, it seemed no one | was interested in football but everyone knew Pele was the | god of his game. | wslh wrote: | Have you watch this? "Diego Maradona Goal of the Century | | Argentina v England | 1986 FIFA World Cup" [1] | | [1] https://youtu.be/Da_CDPRG2j0 | cryptonector wrote: | Lol, yeah. That game in 1986 must have hurt. One of the | most beautiful goals of all time (which Messi has | replicated twice), then that awful hand-of-g-d goal | (which Messi, sadly, has also replicated twice). | nickcox wrote: | The second goal should also never have stood. Clear foul | on Glenn Hoddle. | heywhatupboys wrote: | > then that awful hand-of-g-d goal | | everyone celebrates this goal. No fan has ever given him | shit about it | cryptonector wrote: | I care, what can I say. I want clean futbol. | phlakaton wrote: | Soccer is played by gloriously messy human beings. A bit | of schmutz now and then is not so terrible a thing. | cryptonector wrote: | That adds to Messi's greatness, since he's not | "gloriously messy". | mmplxx wrote: | I would say that Messi is gloriously messy. | mongol wrote: | It was opposite order. Hand goal, then dribble. | mgh2 wrote: | More background: | https://www.npr.org/2022/11/30/1139976898/messi-economics | rvba wrote: | When I was a kid, I always heard some Uncle claim that "rich | people" bribe the doctors to give growth hormone to their | children. That's why supposedly all the "rich people" children | were tall (being well fed probably helps here) | | Is that real that the rich, VC types give growth hormone to | their children? | funnymony wrote: | Growth hormone called food | Aromasin wrote: | Wow. That's an incredible read. | jamespwilliams wrote: | Reminds me of | https://twitter.com/xgphilosophy/status/1604202292139491328 that | I saw this morning | kzrdude wrote: | Idea for this visualization: Highlight every season for Messi | (multiple colored points). Do the same for some other players. | One needs to look around in data to learn more from it. | andrea76 wrote: | If Lionel Messi is impossible, Maradona is more than. | chrisweekly wrote: | Messi's faced better defensive players as the game's evolved. | wslh wrote: | Messi just won his first Football World Cup! | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34040277 | ReptileMan wrote: | Perfect end to a career. | susrev wrote: | emmelaich wrote: | Second if you count the u20 world cup -- in 2005. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2005_FIFA_World_Youth_Champion... | TapWaterBandit wrote: | Noone in the entire history of the planet earth does. | heywhatupboys wrote: | world football championship | markdown wrote: | Soccer Tournament. | elorant wrote: | Mundial | ls15 wrote: | Technically it is _FIFA World Cup_ , a tournament that is | sold to the highest bidder | googlryas wrote: | Right, and it is country-oriented which is fairly | arbitrary, not team-oriented as most football is played. | It's possible the best football team in the world(probably | the UEFA Champions League champs) could beat the winner of | the FIFA World Cup(barring the fact that some of the same | players may be on both teams), since the best football team | can and does draw from many different countries. | wslh wrote: | You missed the basic point: it is not about the UEFA: if | you can build a team with the best (team) players in the | world, it would beat other teams that are based on | nationality or specific leagues like UEFA. If Qatar wants | they can build a better team than the UEFA ones. Hint: | look at Barca. | andrepd wrote: | >If Qatar wants they can build a better team than the | UEFA ones | | They definitely could not | | >Hint: look at Barca. | | What do you mean | nl wrote: | I think @wslh is saying the if you put the best players | from multiple countries together (eg, if Qatar decided to | spend unlimited money to build a club team that would be | eligable for UEFA club competitions) that team would be | the best. | | >>Hint: look at Barca. | | > What do you mean | | This is a reference to the Barcelona teams built with | basically unlimited budgets that have dominated the | European Cup. | | Of course, Qatar sort of does have a UEFA team called | Manchester City via the state-run Qatar Airlines | sponsorship. It has a basically unlimited budget and has | dominated the English premier league for a while now | (although it has struggled in European competition). | gpderetta wrote: | I think it is generally understand that the best football | clubs would far stronger than the best national teams. At | the very least club team players play and train together | the whole year, while national teams only have a few | weeks every couple of years. | andrepd wrote: | National teams play several times a year. | umanwizard wrote: | It's incredibly annoying how whenever someone calls the game | "soccer", a smug European person pipes up to say that it's | really called "football". | | (And yes, I've only ever seen Europeans doing this, not | people from any of the other parts of the world where it's | also called football). | | Is it really so hard for you to accept that there are | different words for things in different countries, and that | not all cultures are identical to your own? | borissk wrote: | Football is kind of a logical name for one game and pretty | illogical for another. | | US should just adopt the metric system and start calling | their sport handegg :) | arkad wrote: | If football rules allow all body parts except hands then | a logical name would be Nohandball. | silisili wrote: | Footheadchestknee ball doesn't quite roll off the tongue | as well, so nohandball it is. | umanwizard wrote: | Both games evolved from the collection of related pre- | modern games that were all called "football", as did | rugby, Australian football, and some others. | | In every English-speaking country, whichever of these | related games is most popular is simply called | "football". | | It's unclear whether the name derives from kicking the | ball with the foot (which happens to a greater or lesser | extent in all such games), or from the fact that they're | played on foot (rather than e.g. on horseback). | Archelaos wrote: | On the etymology of "soccer": 1889, | socca, later socker (1891), soccer (1895), originally | university slang (with jocular formation -er (3)), from a | shortened form of Assoc., abbreviation of association in | Football Association (as opposed to Rugby football); | compare rugger. An unusual method of formation, but those | who did it perhaps shied away from making a name out of | the first three letters of Assoc. Compare 1890s English | schoolboy slang leccer, from lecture (n.). | | Source: https://www.etymonline.com/word/soccer | philwelch wrote: | To your point, the first college football game in the US | was, simultaneously, the first college soccer game | because it took place before the split between soccer and | rugby, and the rules were those drafted by the Football | Association in England. The rugby rules were adopted by | Canadian colleges, who went on to play against American | colleges, who adopted the rugby rules and added the | initial changes that created American football. | GeneralMayhem wrote: | A gridiron football is still clearly a ball in function, | even if not spherical, just like how a rugby ball is | still called a ball. | | The word "football" has been used to describe games | played without kicking for centuries. A possible | etymology is that it means not a game played _with the | feet_ , but a game played _on foot_. It could describe | any of the games played by peasants, as opposed to the | equestrian sports (racing, polo, dressage) played by | aristocrats. | chrisbaker98 wrote: | > A possible etymology is that it means not a game played | with the feet, but a game played on foot. | | As opposed to all those other popular ball games which | are played sitting down? | tromp wrote: | The game of handball is quite popular here in the | Netherlands, differing from football in using hands | instead of feet. | russellbeattie wrote: | >= _US should just adopt the metric system_ | | I just erased a long rant about this, because no one | needs to read another one. | | But I'll summarize: Our refusal to adopt the metric | system is really a symptom of everything that's wrong | with the country today. I blame organized religion. | silisili wrote: | I think at one time, we probably went our own way because | we were first or best. | | But today it just seems hardheaded. And it's not just | metric...you have ANSI vs ISO, electrical systems, 4g and | 5g radio bands, etc. With a world population 20 times the | US population, I foresee a lot more companies just | deciding it doesn't make financial sense to bother with | the US market. We already see that with smartphones. | unity1001 wrote: | > I blame organized religion | | You have no idea how accurate and profound your statement | is. The mid 1800s religious extremism still survives in | the US and plagues its public discourse and institutions | in the form of anti-intellectualism. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti- | intellectualism#United_St... | | The American anti-intellectualism is far stronger | compared to all the forms of anti-intellectualism across | the world, and its surprisingly wide-reaching - a lot of | the anti-intellectual behaviors of the religious American | crowd of 1850s survive today and manifest themselves in | different forms. From opposing science to conservatism in | silly things like the resistance to the metric system and | more. | gregw2 wrote: | French intellectuals want us to divide by the number of | fingers we have, because man is the measure of all | things. They're also in league with mathematicians and | some foreign Arabian number system. | | English engineers much prefer a 12-based system where you | can design, construct and build easily-- dividing | measurements by 2, 3, and 4- where practicality is | foremost. | | I do think French atheism is at the root of it yes. | | P.S. completely trolling/kidding! | | P.P.S. Long before the metric system, the French were | calling a dozen dozen "grosse". The prejudice goes long | back and it isn't from us Angle-ophones! | tragomaskhalos wrote: | You can have the best of both worlds: when I'm fixing my | daughter's curtain rail, I use mm to measure distance | from the window frame because if I use fractions of an | inch I'm far more likely to bugger up the maths. But if I | want to tell someone my height, I will use feet and | inches as those are more human-scale and convenient than | metric. For packaging and products there seems no logical | reason to not cite both, although the EU mandated metric- | only | jcul wrote: | In Ireland we tend to call it soccer, as people use | football to refer to Gaelic (Irish) football. | | I'd imagine any country with a pre-existing sport called | "football" would tend to call it soccer. | class4behavior wrote: | This needs proper data because a lot of people argue the | opposite. The other is then just called gaelic or gaa. | | Also, soccer was invented by the English, let the virus | spread, then switched back to football. | [deleted] | talideon wrote: | It's contextual. Whichever you mainly play, you call it | 'football'. One of the side effects of us having three | kinds of football! | AlchemistCamp wrote: | True. It's also called soccer in Australia and in Japan | (transliterated as satsuka), too. | | You can't really expect people in all places to use the | same words for things. | elcomet wrote: | I've seen only opposite. I live in Europe and no European | I've talked to cares about football or soccer (and they | tend to say "soccer" when they speak to Americans) | | But I've heard a lot of Americans say "no it's called | soccer" when they heard the term football | umanwizard wrote: | To be fair, I rarely hear the Europeans I know in real | life complaining about it either. It seems to be a purely | online phenomenon. | eatbitseveryday wrote: | Soccer redirects to "Association football" on Wikipedia. I | am American and I find "soccer" to be disingenuous to the | sport, since "Football" referring to the ol' hogskin takes | priority but is primarily an American sport. | [deleted] | Nux wrote: | It's incredibly annoying to keep hearing this word, | "soccer" is an insult, the game/sport is called "football". | jonstewart wrote: | Not in the USA it isn't, and this website is hosted in | the USA and it seems likely that at least the largest | plurality, if not majority, of readers live in the USA. | heywhatupboys wrote: | > and this website is hosted in the USA | | of all the arguments in the world this is the worst one. | A nationalist leftover reminding us that while the | internet has potential for global unity, someone will | forcibly drag it down to worldly borders | plandis wrote: | Nothing screams international unity quite like getting | upset some people call a game soccer in their normal | language. | umanwizard wrote: | You're the one chiding people for speaking their native | language online because it differs from yours. | nickcox wrote: | That's not really how the internet works. | [deleted] | jzoch wrote: | I mean the british invented the word soccer to describe | the sport. They also created the sport itself (in its | modern iteration and rules). | josephmosby wrote: | The word "soccer" started in England as a slang of | "association," which became "assocc" and then "soccer." | Americans learned the word from the English. | | It may also surprise you to learn that water closets are | called restrooms in other countries that speak English. | [deleted] | noduerme wrote: | _!Coge tu futbol!_ | | Just means "grab your football" in Spain, but means | something completely different in Argentina ;) | amval wrote: | I don't think anyone would say that in Spain, as long as | they are not having a stroke. | permalac wrote: | Very strong stroke. | umanwizard wrote: | This is similar to getting upset that in various | countries an apple is called "pomme", "manzana", "apple", | etc. Shouldn't we call it by the name it's called in | whichever country it was first cultivated? | | In fact no, we shouldn't, because different languages and | dialects have different words for things, and that's just | a fact of life. | lmm wrote: | If you're speaking a different language, using a | different word is fine. But if you presume to claim to be | speaking "English", then you should use the word they use | in England. | andypea wrote: | Especially as many people in the UK call the game soccer. | For these people the term football would be used to refer | to (Rugby) football. | m4tthumphrey wrote: | World Cup* | smcl wrote: | I think they're having a bit of fun :) | plandis wrote: | > Messi and his compatriots a 16 percent chance of winning the | tournament -- second only to host nation Brazil. | | How it started for Brazil was certainly different from how it | ended for Brazil in that World Cup. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-12-18 23:00 UTC)