[HN Gopher] IRS accidentally releases taxpayers' private data again ___________________________________________________________________ IRS accidentally releases taxpayers' private data again Author : arkadiyt Score : 135 points Date : 2022-12-18 20:45 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (news.bloombergtax.com) (TXT) w3m dump (news.bloombergtax.com) | Lionga wrote: | Ooopsie | toomuchtodo wrote: | Accenture is the contractor responsible. | nvdrx wrote: | Perfect. It's not like the gov to pass the buck to a corpo. | systemvoltage wrote: | IMO the resposibility is entirely on IRS. They chose the | contractor, they wrote the legal terms and conditions, they | vetted them out and they presumably did the due diligence for | security. | latency-guy2 wrote: | They also provided them with training, access rights, and | general governance over the data. | | I'd personally blame 70% of the blame on the IRS, 30% on the | contractor. Organizations should not be able to skirt blame | by way of contractor IMO. Hope the IRS gets fined for gross | negligence and breach of data. (lol) | yucky wrote: | My agreement is with the IRS, not Accenture. | | The IRS is 100% responsible. | lgbrandon wrote: | Nothing to see here folks we are in good hands | [deleted] | sircastor wrote: | Title should probably read IRS Contractor accidentally releases | the data again... | | This is bad of course, but I'm kind of amazed it was only 112k. | Given the 330some million citizens, and presumably some more | entities that also pay taxes, this is a relatively small number. | tiahura wrote: | I'm less concerned about the occasional unintentional f'up, and | much more concerned about the targeted and politically motivated | intentional leaking of information. | ComputerGuru wrote: | Are you saying "I'm not concerned about data leaks that I could | potentially be affected by and have my own personal information | leaked through as much as I am about a celebrity billionaire | getting their tax records released after years of litigation | and after lawsuits going all the way to the Supreme Court (or | others like him)?" | AmericanChopper wrote: | I would say I find government corruption to be more | concerning than government incompetence. For the same reason | that I would find a crime committed with intent to be more | concerning than a crime committed with negligence. Neither | are unconcerning though. | johncessna wrote: | I think I know the problem, they probably don't have one of those | 25 minute annual data governance trainings to teach/remind them | how to handle PII. | theknocker wrote: | ccn0p wrote: | What they really need are more agents. I think 87,000 should do | the trick. | dossy wrote: | > "The agency is reconsidering its relationship with the | contractor Accenture on this project, according to a person | familiar." | | Any time I start to feel that Impostor Syndrome creeping in, I | need to remind myself that there's someone who's working at | Accenture probably earning 2x or 3x what I am, who gets to fuck | up big not once but _twice_ doing the same wrong thing. | jermaustin1 wrote: | Everyone I've met at accenture actually was paid below market, | and usually billed at 5x their cost, or more. | ipsum2 wrote: | Doesn't Accenture outsource a lot of its work to India and | other third-world countries? | | Edit: According to Wikipedia, yes: | | > In 2015, the company had about 150,000 employees in | India,[31] 48,000 in the US,[32] and 50,000 in the | Philippines.[33] | | So the Accenture engineer probably gets paid a lot less than | you. | birdymcbird wrote: | eatYourFood wrote: | throwawaysleep wrote: | They are like IBM. They can fail at everything forever and | still get work. | [deleted] | mistrial9 wrote: | the forms in question are US non-profit declarations 990-T. The | same data was released a second time, minus less than 2% of them. | There are a lot of dark corners in the USA non-profit world, in | case you don't know it. The vast majority (a million?) of USA 990 | non-profits are the sort of small time operation you might | expect, but there is a tiger of a long-tail on that one. Many | major hospitals and the US Football league NFL, are "non-profit" | and would file the same forms. | bmelton wrote: | > US Football league NFL, are "non-profit" | | This is not true now, and arguably never was (at least not with | the intention it's generally applied). | | The NFL relinquished its tax exempt status in 2015, but even | before that the NFL was not a 501(c)(3) but a 501(c)(6) (a | trade organization) -- for interests of fairness (proven more | necessary recently by actions of the Washington Commanders) the | NFL collected ticket moneys and broadcast earnings and then | distributed the money to the teams, where it was taxed. Without | that, they'd have been taxed on the collection and on the | disbursement, which would have meant that the teams were taxed | twice. | | There are, to my opinion anyway, better reasons to be mad at | the NFL than as a tax dodge, because they weren't ever | particularly good at meeting the definition. | | https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/tax-season/ | gumby wrote: | The US Football league NFL also has an antitrust exemption so | is deserving of public scrutiny. | KennyBlanken wrote: | NCAA is predicted to go for antitrust exemptions as well as | lobby for legislation to dump the requirement to pay student | athletes - all things Baker is expected to do, leveraging his | political connections as a former governor and figure in the | republican party. | dmonitor wrote: | I'm under the impression that the NCAA (or at least the | schools) fought hard to legalize paying student athletes. | Most big schools were illegally paying their players before | it was allowed. | | if they wanted to spin off college football to a semi-pro | league and let actual students play the game instead of | "students" who get private tutors, sleep in a private dorm, | have a private cafeteria, take exclusive classes, and | generally don't interact with the rest of the student body, | I would support this movement. | yucky wrote: | I don't believe this is correct, which is why competing | leagues pop up every few years. | | You might be thinking of Major League Baseball? | rufus_foreman wrote: | Hey. Mr. Wimbley, it happened again. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-12-18 23:00 UTC)