[HN Gopher] Philadelphia Phreakers installing free payphone
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Philadelphia Phreakers installing free payphone
        
       Author : DoktorDelta
       Score  : 189 points
       Date   : 2022-12-21 15:26 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.nbcphiladelphia.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.nbcphiladelphia.com)
        
       | theonething wrote:
       | anyone remember the needles in coin return slot scare growing up?
       | We didn't the internet to check if it was real so I'd always be a
       | little paranoid when getting my coins back.
       | 
       | https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/slots-of-fun/
        
       | jonnycomputer wrote:
       | My big worry with the disappearance of public pay-phones is for
       | the homeless and other poor. However, I recently learned that
       | there are often programs to assist them with getting cellular
       | devices. All in all, a mobile device is probably much more useful
       | than a public payphone (as long as they can keep it charged). I'm
       | a little under-educated on what the actual reality of this
       | situation is, tbh.
        
         | 2OEH8eoCRo0 wrote:
         | Critics often call the free phones _Obama phones_
        
           | pessimizer wrote:
           | Supporters often call the free phones "Obama phones" too.
           | Just like Obamacare started off as a slur towards ACA, the
           | party saw Obama's name as a way to link a benefit to
           | Democrats and detourned it. It's like the Bush tax rebate or
           | the Trump stimulus.
        
           | zikduruqe wrote:
           | Which Lifeline phones started in 1985 under Regan.
           | 
           | https://www.fcc.gov/general/lifeline-program-low-income-
           | cons...
           | 
           | But it's easy to blame Obama.
        
             | notinfuriated wrote:
             | It was a relatively memorable moment of the 2012 election.
             | 
             | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpAOwJvTOio
             | 
             | I had a note in this comment on fraud, but it looks like
             | there was probably a consistent pattern of waste/fraud for
             | a long time (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Servic
             | e_Fund#Waste_a...). There were some proven accusations of
             | fraud in 2012 as well:
             | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rY4cy95VFes
        
               | [deleted]
        
               | zikduruqe wrote:
               | Obama Phone Lady as evidence of fraud.... laughable.
               | 
               | I used to sell Lifeline phones into certain carriers back
               | in 2009 - 2012 when I worked with various phone OEMs. I
               | can see where some phone resellers could create some
               | fraud.
               | 
               | But the government is not involved. They merely subsidize
               | the program.
        
               | notinfuriated wrote:
               | Just to be clear, I was not claiming that Obama phone
               | lady was evidence of fraud. I was only pointing out it
               | was a memorable moment during the 2012 election because
               | that clip was replayed ad nauseam at the time. So I think
               | people call them "Obama phones" because of a fairly
               | successful campaign at pinning their existence or
               | popularity on Barack Obama (where this woman credited her
               | free phone to Obama), and this particular video clip was
               | shown quite a bit at the time.
               | 
               | The fraud remark in my comment was about the other news
               | video I linked and also a link to wikipedia. Free phones
               | and phone plans are really, really low on my list of
               | things I care about in terms of examples of bad
               | governance in the US.
        
             | tomschlick wrote:
             | Around the time Obama became president is when they started
             | giving cell phones from the program instead of just
             | subsidizing landline phones. It happened before he was
             | president but given the recession that took place while he
             | was president it was regarded as the Obama phone because he
             | was president when the majority of people got them.
        
           | bittercynic wrote:
           | Such a strange twist of language.
           | 
           | As someone who thinks free phones to those who need one is a
           | good thing, and thinks Obama was generally a pretty good
           | dude, I wouldn't automatically ready negative sentiment into
           | those words.
        
         | Daltzn wrote:
         | Every hospital I have ever been have a free phone in the ED
         | waiting room. It's common to see a homeless person using it.
         | Has a list of numbers for shelters, taxis etc posted along side
         | it.
        
         | mzs wrote:
         | Their cellphones tend to get stolen 2-4 times a year.
        
         | forgotmypw17 wrote:
         | It is a helpful program. With minimal paperwork, you get a
         | device with calling and data service. The phone hardware ranges
         | from basic to decent. They typically have much less crapware
         | installed than your average store phone.
         | 
         | Several challenges with the program exist, compared to
         | payphones.
         | 
         | a) It is difficult to hold on to anything when you live on the
         | street, even without any bad habits. Without a place to keep
         | your things, they regularly get lost, stolen, etc. If you have
         | a habit, you may also be tempted to pawn the device for a few
         | bucks.
         | 
         | b) The paperwork and process is minimal, but is still a
         | barrier. For example, some programs do not give you a device on
         | the spot, but it must be mailed to you. I had mine mailed to a
         | post office and it got lost. I never received the device, but I
         | was marked as having ordered one in the system. From that point
         | on, even years later, I could never qualify for another one.
         | 
         | Compare this to a stationary device that's always there that
         | doesn't have to be maintained by you, and the advantages are
         | clear.
         | 
         | New York has a pretty good system of LinkNYC kiosks, which
         | provide basic calling service, and are maintained reasonably
         | well (about half work at any given time.) They were better when
         | they allowed browsing the web, but that functionality was taken
         | away after Reddit raised a stink about someone browsing porn on
         | them.
        
           | sam345 wrote:
           | Reasonably well = half work?
        
             | forgotmypw17 wrote:
             | they get a lot of use and abuse, so I imagine it's
             | difficult to keep up with repairs.
        
         | intrasight wrote:
         | Homeless and poor can get free phones in many municipalities.
         | I'm a technical consultant for the BigBurg app
         | [http://www.informingdesign.com/bigburgh] and getting free
         | phones into people's hands in part of the project. It actually
         | saves the municipalities money - which makes sense in our
         | digital society. They are able to deliver social services more
         | directly and at lower cost.
         | 
         | Hopefully those free phone booths also have a USB port for
         | charging.
        
           | shagie wrote:
           | ... that then get stolen (and make it difficult to use for
           | 2FA).
           | 
           | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33120534
        
       | ipdashc wrote:
       | I'm somewhat acquainted with one of the guys running this effort,
       | and it's really been amazing to see it go from "unknown niche
       | hobby project" to "all over the news" practically overnight.
       | Nobody is sure why the media seized on it so much, but in the
       | course of a week or two, it went from completely obscure, to
       | being reported on by a few Internet-based techy/nerdy media
       | outlets, to being talked about by the mainstream news (NBC!). I
       | guess people are more interested in payphones than expected.
       | 
       | Though it does bum me out that a typical comment section on the
       | mainstream news articles is 30% "why is the government spending
       | money on this? Lower my taxes!!" It's a completely volunteer
       | project guys, there is no government money involved... ah well.
        
         | DannyBee wrote:
         | Do you know why does he pay per minute?
         | 
         | Can't he hook it up to ooma or something that only charges the
         | monthly regulatory fees?
        
           | mmcgaha wrote:
           | I was thinking stick in a gsm module with $7/month airvoice
           | sim.
           | 
           | https://www.airvoicewireless.com/plan/monthy-plan
        
           | mandelbrotwurst wrote:
           | Most likely he's not and the article contains an inaccuracy.
        
       | ChrisArchitect wrote:
       | This is all good, hack the planet and all that, but meanwhile
       | there are Link NYC boxes with free calls all over NYC no?
       | (debatable quality etc but still, they're there)
        
         | c22 wrote:
         | The gas station near my house still runs a COCOT. I don't know
         | what to tell you.
        
         | aposm wrote:
         | However those are well-documented to be data-harvesting devices
         | placed by a for-profit company, despite receiving government
         | money as well. PhilTel is a non-profit volunteer organization
         | run by community members.
        
       | ChrisArchitect wrote:
       | Other discussion on this earlier this month:
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33851030
        
       | dragonsky67 wrote:
       | In Australia a couple of years ago Telstra, which I believe is
       | required by the government to provide public phones. They have
       | discovered that it's cheaper to just provide the phones free
       | rather than have to continuously repair them after people try to
       | jack the coin hopper or deal with support for refunding card
       | payments when the payment succeeds but the call does not go
       | through.
       | 
       | https://exchange.telstra.com.au/why-were-making-payphones-fr...
        
         | SQueeeeeL wrote:
         | 'Something something, tragedy of the commons. Some veiled
         | comment about "undesirables" using the phones all the time.
         | There's no such thing as a free lunch, this is a perversion of
         | all known theory to not force a profit.'
        
       | ourmandave wrote:
       | Reminded me of 2600 magazine's reader pics of payphones from
       | around the world.
       | 
       | I haven't looked at a copy in forever so I don't know if it's
       | still a thing.
        
         | tux wrote:
         | Actually 2600 is still alive and well, they sell 2600 Magazine:
         | The Hacker Quarterly @ Amazon. [1]
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2600:_The_Hacker_Quarterly
        
           | arthurjj wrote:
           | Their podcast, off the hook is weekly and in the same spirit.
           | https://www.2600.com/offthehook/
        
         | knewter wrote:
         | It is and it is still why I go to the magazine stand if I'm in
         | a bookstore
        
       | Eleison23 wrote:
        
       | c22 wrote:
       | See also: futel
       | 
       | http://futel.net/
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32118936
        
       | giantg2 wrote:
        
         | mikestew wrote:
         | Why disagree? I don't, necessarily. But you took a side comment
         | and turned it into a very off-topic topic of discussion that
         | has nothing to do with TFA. Have a downvote.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | giantg2 wrote:
        
         | schoen wrote:
         | You replied to a complaint about an off-topic post elsewhere
         | with a further discussion of the substance of the off-topic
         | issue. So other HN readers were probably not eager to have you
         | continue that discussion in this thread.
        
           | giantg2 wrote:
           | Why is the off-topic comment I was replying to the top
           | comment for the submission? I guess I just suck. Thanks.
        
           | [deleted]
        
       | vips7L wrote:
       | I wonder how long it will take before my fellow Philadelphians
       | smash these things.
        
         | dylan604 wrote:
         | What? Are you saying the City of Brotherly Love is truly closer
         | to the City of Brotherly Shove?
        
       | xattt wrote:
       | Tangential, but what would be the most expensive outgoing call
       | destination from mainland North America, sat phones excluded?
        
         | lormayna wrote:
         | Many years ago I worked for a VOIP provider. The most expensive
         | frauds that we detected was calling special service in remote
         | place of the world like Tristan de Cunha, Nauru, Falkland or
         | Buthan. Something like 50$ for minutes and 10$ at the response.
        
         | willcipriano wrote:
         | Not a destination but my guess is one of these would be the
         | most expensive call (I think some people here are young enough
         | to not be aware of these):
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premium-rate_telephone_numbe...
        
         | sbarre wrote:
         | North Korea I believe.. then all the little Pacific islands.
        
         | Scoundreller wrote:
         | For a while there was a lot of in-cahoots fraud where a
         | country's telecom would make seemingly arbitrary numbers a
         | premium rate $$$/min number and some uncareful VoIP providers
         | got hosed.
         | 
         | https://www.forbes.com/forbes/2005/0919/058.html?sh=3e7f98cc...
        
       | elecush wrote:
       | really great to consider what the younger generations will
       | surmise
        
       | thrownaway561 wrote:
       | I applaud this in so many ways... however the realist in me knows
       | that, like most pay phones, this thing will be vandalized in a
       | matter of weeks.
        
       | geocrasher wrote:
       | I'm not sure what surprised me more: Seeing a guy installing free
       | payphones (a great idea!) or seeing the term "Phreaker" on HN :D
        
         | myvoiceismypass wrote:
         | The article linked does not mention it, but these phones are
         | connected to PhreakNet also: https://portal.phreaknet.org/
        
           | jrochkind1 wrote:
           | Wow! I... do not understand what this is. Can phreaknet make
           | and receive calls from the general public phone network?
        
             | tecleandor wrote:
             | Nope, as I understand is a parallel network.
             | 
             | https://portal.phreaknet.org/faq
        
         | Quarrelsome wrote:
         | > seeing the term "Phreaker" on HN
         | 
         | its not _that_ uncommon is it? Given that phreakers are like
         | the genesis of hackers.
        
           | _joel wrote:
           | Not really, I recall this being posted when it came out which
           | has a good phreaking lineage :)
           | http://www.phrack.org/issues/70/1.html
        
           | intelkishan wrote:
           | Phreakers were the second generation of hackers. The original
           | hackers were a collective of students in MIT
        
             | _joel wrote:
             | Phreaking is phone comms, which is a subset of
             | hacking/cracking imho
        
               | nbk_2000 wrote:
               | This is how I've always heard it categorized, since at
               | least the early 90's.
        
             | manv1 wrote:
             | No, phreakers have been around since the Bell system.
             | That's Capt. Crunch etc.
        
               | m4jor wrote:
               | I met Capt. Crunch at DEF CON 5-6 years ago.
               | 
               | I was so excited and even got a picture with him. Then I
               | found out about his dark and sketchy past from others
               | when I told people about it.
               | 
               | tl;dr = hes basically a sexual predator/creeper w young
               | boys.
        
               | mistrial9 wrote:
               | I will defend Capt. Crunch a bit.. no, not 'predator'
               | thats a legal accusation. AutoDesk brought a fully
               | configured Sun to his messy desk in the 1980s, and "the
               | workout" was sort of repressed sexual behavior yes, but
               | not 'predator' .. no way.. How many people here are
               | active kinky ? loud about it too.. Its a complicated
               | story.. no CANCEL on Capt Crunch, please
               | 
               | If you want to hate on someone in a cowardly anonymous
               | way, I would go for that ReiserFS guy, who lived in the
               | same area at the same time
        
               | squarefoot wrote:
               | Parent is probably referring to the Tech Model Railroad
               | Club at MIT, which is considered the first recognized
               | group of hackers and predates Capt. Crunch by at least a
               | decade.
        
         | theCrowing wrote:
         | we still phreaking.
        
       | CivBase wrote:
       | Does anyone still make phone books? I can count the number of
       | phone numbers I have memorized on one hand. Without access to a
       | phone number registry of some sort, I think these would have
       | extremely limited value to most people.
       | 
       | It's a neat project though.
        
         | binarymax wrote:
         | Looks like white pages can be ordered for free[0], but yellow
         | pages ceased print copy in 2017.
         | 
         | [0] https://www.verizon.com/about/our-company/white-pages
        
         | _joel wrote:
         | In the UK they were still about up until recently but became
         | smaller and smaller. I've not had a landline for years now so
         | not sure if they're still released now. I'd imagine not, but
         | who knows.
        
         | AussieWog93 wrote:
         | >I think these would have extremely limited value to most
         | people.
         | 
         | Quite recently in Australia, every single phone booth in the
         | country was made free to use.
         | 
         | When asked why this was the case, the spokesperson for Telstra
         | (the company that owned them) explained that one of the major
         | users of phone booths were people escaping from domestic
         | violence situations. Apparently it was very common for abusive
         | partners to control phone access (and access to cash, too,
         | hence why they made the network free).
         | 
         | Point is, don't underestimate the importance of obsolete
         | services!
        
           | jessaustin wrote:
           | Seems to indicate that Telstra is better than every single
           | American phone company?
        
         | twobitshifter wrote:
         | I see what you're saying but if you don't have a phone, you'll
         | remember the numbers you need or at least write them down
         | somewhere and create your own registry. If you don't have that
         | there's always 411
        
         | tclancy wrote:
         | Sadly, they stopped giving them out around here almost a decade
         | ago. Made me sad, because we got them in early October and
         | every year I would hang onto it until near the end of the night
         | on Halloween when some over-aged kid doing the ironic tour
         | called out "Trick or treat" and I'd say "trick" and drop it in
         | their pillowcase.
        
         | sbarre wrote:
         | When I was younger some of my friends who had very limited
         | income could often not afford to top up their cell phone
         | minutes, but still had their phone with an address book full of
         | numbers in their pocket. I would lend them my phone and they'd
         | call someone from the list in their phone using my phone.
         | 
         | I feel like someone who relies on free or community phones
         | would have a similar book of numbers that are meaningful to
         | them.
         | 
         | Of course if you're looking to call somewhere new, then that's
         | definitely an issue.
        
           | c22 wrote:
           | When I was a kid I had a DTMF tone-dialer which was a small
           | device with all my numbers in it and a small speaker in a
           | rubber cup. I could select a number from the list then hold
           | the speaker against the receiver of a (hardwired) telephone
           | to dial the number. I actually had two of these, the other of
           | which I modified to simulate the signalling sound of dimes
           | and quarters dropping into a payphone.
        
         | weberer wrote:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4-1-1
        
       | graupel wrote:
       | Wait so this is a real....phone? Using old-school twisted pair
       | phone lines? If it has a monthly cost that scales with use it
       | must, but it seems like making this IP would be more practical,
       | if a little less fun?
        
         | c22 wrote:
         | No, they're using analog telephone adapters and Asterisk. [0]
         | 
         | [0]: https://philtel.org/2022/12/15/asterisk-overview.html
        
       | tecleandor wrote:
       | Time really flies! I still remember when my friends from the
       | Patio Maravillas social center in Madrid set up one in this
       | style... in 2009 ! At the time and in the beginning, it was a
       | bunch of countries only, as VoIP gateways weren't as popular as
       | now.
       | 
       | https://web.archive.org/web/20090402170754/http://www.patiom...
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patio_Maravillas
        
       | kepler1 wrote:
       | How long before someone with less-than-good intentions walks up
       | and starts using this phone in ways that the creators didn't
       | intend, and it has to be shut down?
        
         | jandrese wrote:
         | Being somewhat famous and in a public place makes it less than
         | ideal for calling in bomb threats or whatnot.
        
         | c22 wrote:
         | Like as a bludgeoning weapon or something? Legally I think this
         | service falls under common carrier protections.
        
         | everybodyknows wrote:
         | Users are apparently anonymous -- this will make it non-
         | sustainable. One plausible fix: A video camera that records
         | faces. Otherwise the homeless will be taking a beating from the
         | local drug dealer whenever they get in the way of urgent
         | business.
         | 
         | Like this:
         | 
         |  _Q. Do Links have cameras and what happens to the footage?
         | 
         | There are two security cameras on each Link._
         | 
         | https://www.link.nyc/faq.html
        
       | bitwize wrote:
       | "...and never again pay for a service that would be dirt cheap,
       | if it weren't run by a bunch of profiteering gluttons!"
       | 
       | Hack the planet!
        
       | slackfan wrote:
       | A free PAYphone seems like an oxymoron.
       | 
       | Perhaps they meant public phone?
        
         | Wohlf wrote:
         | It's more about the image a payphone conjures in the mind,
         | which is accurate.
        
       | nashashmi wrote:
       | New Idea: Android tablet connected by wire (PoE?) with tap-and-
       | pay NFC giving out a unique Wifi QR code. And that will give you
       | pay-per-use-or by-minute internet at every booth. A free phone
       | call is just a headphone plug away with voice activated calling.
       | Full hardware with phone handle and/or tablet screen browsing is
       | (much) extra.
        
         | noAnswer wrote:
         | Pay phones had a pay for Wifi options. (At least in Germany.)
         | It didn't save them neither.
        
         | awiesenhofer wrote:
         | > pay-per-use
         | 
         | Why would you charge for that? Especially if you want to help
         | homeless etc.?
         | 
         | Just make it a free wifi hotspot and be done with it.
        
         | e_i_pi_2 wrote:
         | I think the main goal here is that people using the phone don't
         | have to pay for it. To that point though, it may be cheaper to
         | use an existing (maybe thrown away) phone and just install it
         | in a phone booth, then have an unlimited calling service set up
         | so it's free for anyone on the street to use
        
       | plusminusplus wrote:
       | Who's listening in?
        
       | tux wrote:
       | One of the best projects I've seen in years. This project should
       | receive some sort of grant or at least award from Philadelphia.
       | This brought back good memories :) EDIT: Hack The Planet and
       | maybe @giantg2 for downvotes! ^_^
        
         | giantg2 wrote:
         | Good luck getting money from Philly. Philly is one of the
         | poorest big cities. They certainly don't have money for
         | anything like this. Better off looking for grants from rich
         | people who work in Philly (I didn't say residents because most
         | of them choose to live outside the city in places like Radnor).
        
       | baron816 wrote:
       | Will the pay phones support Apple Pay?
        
         | jagged-chisel wrote:
         | It supports any payment system that permits a sale of $0.00
        
       | martyvis wrote:
       | All the 15000 payphones in Australia are free and have WiFi.
       | https://www.telstra.com.au/consumer-advice/payphones
        
         | sillypuddy wrote:
         | Who pays for them to be free?
        
           | femto wrote:
           | It's worth it to Telstra, to hold onto the real estate. They
           | have effectively been been gifted a nationwide network of
           | plots of land and structures that turn out to be a good match
           | for 5G/6G/WiFi base station locations.
           | 
           | They are probably kicking themselves for ripping out so many
           | phones in the past, thus giving up the locations.
        
       | pmarreck wrote:
       | I love that a phone phreaker has a "free payphone" hobby project!
        
       | niklasrde wrote:
       | BT in the UK has been replacing payphones with advertising
       | billboard, with a little digital infopad, USB charging and free
       | domestic calls. Calls are cheap as, they probably still make a
       | profit with the advertising. It's win-win, though they are a bit
       | of an eyesore.
        
         | ascagnel_ wrote:
         | NYC has been doing the same thing, but there are concerns over
         | tracking (the terminals are equipped with cameras that may or
         | may not be running facial recognition software).
        
       | finnh wrote:
       | > Mike Dank
       | 
       |  _name checks out_
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-12-21 23:00 UTC)