[HN Gopher] Caroline Ellison, CEO of Alameda Research, pleads gu... ___________________________________________________________________ Caroline Ellison, CEO of Alameda Research, pleads guilty to seven offences Author : Animatronio Score : 79 points Date : 2022-12-23 21:45 UTC (1 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.theguardian.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.theguardian.com) | jmyeet wrote: | It's interesting to see this play out because much of it was | predictable. Personally, I was amused at the people complaining | that the SBF case was taking too long. If however you know | something about how Federal prosecutions work, you'd know (and I | made many comments about this) that the case was moving | incredibly quickly. | | As soon as SBF was indicted, it confirmed that the Feds had 1 or | more cooperating witnesses and many correctly theorized Caroline | Ellison was one of them. The other is less well-known but this | basically maps out the prosecution's case. Ellison will testify | to SBF's knowledge of the scheme. The other will testify to SBF | instructing him to build the backdoor. Case closed. | | This is an open and shut case. SBF getting out on bail was a | surprise and it shows the double standard to how the US uses its | civil asset forfeiture power. Specifically, that doesn't seem to | be used against SBF, his parents and his associates in a way that | it has with far less wealthy people. I want people to realize | that. For the record, I consider civil asset forfeiture to be | unconstitutional and a travesty of justice but it is the law of | the land. | | I'm going to be really interested to see what kind of deal the | Feds cut for two witnesses. Could it be as light as no jail time? | I have doubts but it's not impossible. It'll probably be a much | lighter sentence, probably less than 10 years, maybe less than 5. | 1vuio0pswjnm7 wrote: | Strange. By today's 24-hour news cycle standard, this is arguably | "old news". These documents have been available for at least 24h. | I know because I submitted them to HN yesterday. | | Ellison's Plea Agreement | | https://assets.bwbx.io/documents/users/iqjWHBFdfxIU/r478tCuj... | | CTFC v SBF, Ellison and Wang Amended Complaint | | https://assets.bwbx.io/documents/users/iqjWHBFdfxIU/rRCRC2hQ... | | Wang's Plea Agreement | | https://assets.bwbx.io/documents/users/iqjWHBFdfxIU/rWKaiz60... | MarcelOlsz wrote: | [flagged] | ttoinou wrote: | Why did you trust them in the first place ? | MarcelOlsz wrote: | I never trusted any of these cunts. I didn't give them my | money because I'm not a fucking idiot. How dare you try to | assume I wrote my post out of personal anger. How dare you | victim blame me in the face of a robber barons. You are an | awful person. | Nicksil wrote: | >I never trusted any of these cunts. I didn't give them my | money because I'm not a fucking idiot. How dare you try to | assume I wrote my post out of personal anger. How dare you | victim blame me in the face of a robber barons. You are an | awful person. | | You're trying way too hard. | danrocks wrote: | How could he _not_ trust them in the first place? C-level | executives are on the record, before Congress, with the | biggest and brightest politicians around, saying everything | should be regulated, including themselves. They 're actively | projecting that they acknowledge the general sleaze | surrounding the crypto industry and they are not a part of | it. | | Hindsight is 20/20, but can you look at Binance, crypto.com, | and other 'trusted' crypto exchanges _now_ and say "how can | you trust them"? | | SBF was hanging out with people who lent him their | credibility and actively asking to be regulated - it doesn't | get much better than that for the average person. | serf wrote: | >Hindsight is 20/20, but can you look at Binance, | crypto.com, and other 'trusted' crypto exchanges now and | say "how can you trust them"? | | after this history of crypto exchanges thus-far? | absolutely. | danrocks wrote: | Well, when this particular exchange is operating legally | in the US and its CEO is respected enough to have a sit | at the table with Maxine Waters, the hardest-ass | congressperson when it comes to the financial sector, | it's much harder than some guy yelling about his exchange | on TikTok or Instagram? | MarcelOlsz wrote: | She is the opposite of "hardest-ass" as she is sitting | down with these robbers and they're all greasing each | others palms. This shit doesn't magically happen. | braingenious wrote: | Considering the fact that we now know that Maxine Waters | got bamboozled by a 20something crypto bro, has your | opinion of her being a competent regulator of the finance | industry changed at all? | | It's fascinating when people think of politicians like | sports teams and not public employees with a mandate of | competence. | braingenious wrote: | > How could he not trust them in the first place? | | Because they were running a crypto exchange, a sort of | business that very frequently ends rapidly and in a way | that is not good for regular users. | [deleted] | jazzyjackson wrote: | I don't see an implication that this person is personally | fucked by FTX/Alameda, just mad that fraudsters are rolling | in dough (til they get caught anyway, as they say, high risk | high reward) | MarcelOlsz wrote: | Yes. Exactly. Every day I wake up and I have to hear about | some next cunt I've never heard of before. "Richest before | 30!". Some other trillionaire. Some other little kid son of | ivy's who ran away with another billion. It's always some | fucking scam. Every fucking day. What is the point anymore? | I'm a regular cunt who wants to do regular cunt things but | I have to wake up to news that Google is planning a 30B | "tech park" local to me. | | Just kill me please. | neilv wrote: | That one word doesn't translate well across countries. | And in the US will come across as misogyny, which will | affect how people interpret everything else you said. | baeaz wrote: | That's not a problem as long as people exist outside the | US. | neilv wrote: | "Two peoples, divided by a common language." | owlglass wrote: | While watching these people use their privilege to steal | so much money is frustrating, I don't see how some Ivey | League twenty-something's wrongdoing prevents you from | doing regular things. | klipt wrote: | I wonder if something similar will eventually happen to the | Tether people? To my understanding they're printing money (USDT) | which they claim is backed 1:1 by USD but really isn't. These | USDTs can then be spent to pump up various other crypto assets. | Seems a very shady business. | ummonk wrote: | My conspiracy theory is that USDT is actually well backed, but | the Tether people intentionally make it look shady so they can | buy the dip and arbitrage against panic selling. Some | volatility would actually increase their ability to profit. | roland35 wrote: | That's crazy. I'm thinking Hanlon's razor applies here, there | is absolutely no evidence that tether is legit. | 323 wrote: | Where are all the Tether holders complaining that they | can't convert it into dollars? | potatototoo99 wrote: | They don't claim it's backed 1:1 by USD. They claim it's backed | by more or less liquid alternatives: | https://tether.to/en/transparency/#reports | rcxdude wrote: | Now they do (previously they claimed 1:1 with actual dollars | in a bank account, but failed to demonstrate that). But that | 80% "Commercial paper" is suspicious as hell, considering it | would make up more than half the total market for said paper | (so 'liquid' is already questionable), and no-one else in the | market has heard of them. | richbell wrote: | > They don't claim it's backed 1:1 by USD. They claim it's | backed by more or less liquid alternatives | | They used to, for several years, until they were pressured to | prove it and could not (27:05). | | https://youtu.be/-whuXHSL1Pg | | They were also investigated and found guilty by the New York | Attorney General, and were subsequently banned from activity | in New York and fined 18.5M. | | > Bitfinex and Tether recklessly and unlawfully covered-up | massive financial losses to keep their scheme going and | protect their bottom lines," said Attorney General James. | "Tether's claims that its virtual currency was fully backed | by U.S. dollars at all times was a lie. | | https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/2021/attorney-general- | james-... | 323 wrote: | > _These USDTs can then be spent to pump up various other | crypto assets_ | | So why don't they do that now? Why are the crypto prices at two | years low? | | This is the age old ZeroHedge conspiracy recycled - if the | stock market goes up, it's because of WOPRs (their name for HFT | algos) and the Fed plunge-protection-team, but if it goes down | it's because of healthy market forces which are calling the | Feds bluff. | pearjuice wrote: | If anything, the pressure on Sam might result in him turning on | Tether/Binance/other-frauds with key insider evidence for | reduced sentencing. The guy's a pvp gamer at heart so probably | min-maxing with his lawyers what he can do as a criminal | informant. | quanticle wrote: | He's a PVP gamer who can't even get out of the bottom-most | tier of League of Legends. [1] I very much doubt he's trying | to game plan anything of this kind of sophistication. | | [1]: https://www.ft.com/content/23ab2258-ce03-4fbb-a9b2-7d9ec | 6e3d... | danrocks wrote: | Didn't Tether get ordered the other day to disclaim all of its | reserves? What happened to that? I find it incredible they keep | surviving attempts to reveal exactly how the sausage is made in | their reserves. | | https://www.yahoo.com/video/stablecoin-issuer-tether-ordered... | maria2 wrote: | It seems like they were ordered to give the plaintiffs the | documents, but they weren't ordered to publicly release them. | NYAG also looked into them last year. They were fined but it | doesn't seem like anything else came of it. | | > The New York Attorney General's probe into Tether's | reserves concluded in February 2021 with an $18.5 million | settlement. | | I don't hold any tether, and I wouldn't recommend it to | others. But the common opinion that Tether is insolvent might | be wrong. Tether, as a stable business, is a money printing | machine. I'm not sure it'd be worth risking the business and | jail time to pump shitcoins. | rcxdude wrote: | If Tether is solvent and above board then it's being run | utterly incompetently. absolutely everything they do | regarding their reserves makes them look shady as hell (the | most likely situation where they are solvent is that they | are solvent with dirty money, which would explain why they | are so unwilling to demonstrate exactly where the money is | and where it came from). | richbell wrote: | > I don't hold any tether, and I wouldn't recommend it to | others. But the common opinion that Tether is insolvent | might be wrong. Tether, as a stable business, is a money | printing machine. I'm not sure it'd be worth risking the | business and jail time to pump shitcoins | | I encourage you to watch Coffeezilla's video about Tether. | There's lots of shady stuff going on behind the scenes, | like them borrowing $383M from Bitfinex and showing that to | an auditor to prove they were solvent (~20:00). | | https://youtu.be/-whuXHSL1Pg | PeterisP wrote: | Well, FTX, as a stable business, should be a money printing | machine - but that definitely wasn't an obstacle for its | leaders to risk the business and jail time to speculate | with customers' funds. | maria2 wrote: | FTX might have been a money-printing machine, but the | situation with Alameda is a lot less clear. Being a | market maker is hard. If you make a mistake, you can lose | a lot of money. It's probably easier to be a crook. | HWR_14 wrote: | If Tether put all its money into low-yield short term US | treasuries, the founders could pay every employee $10MM | USD a year and still be paying themselves $1 billion USD | a year. | | That is a phenomenal amount of risk free income. That's | putting the founders somewhere high, probably first 50 | names high, on the Forbes 400 list. | | That seems foolish to risk to commit crimes. | onlyrealcuzzo wrote: | The founder posted publicly about printing tether to pump | Bitcoin I'm the earlier days of Tether (after previously | being convicted of fraud) - and then tried to delete the | posts - but couldn't because of Internet Archive... | andersonmvd wrote: | The 7 offences are not detailed individually in the news, or I | couldn't find it. | danrocks wrote: | They are here: | https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23495436-crypto-coop... | mikeyouse wrote: | https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23495436-crypto-coop... | berkle4455 wrote: | Two counts of wire fraud, two counts of conspiracy to commit | wire fraud, conspiracy to commit commodities fraud, conspiracy | to commit securities fraud and conspiracy to commit money | laundering. | | Maximum sentence of 110 years. | cma wrote: | Howey test classifying some tokens as securities others as | commodities I guess? | baeaz wrote: | I have always wondered why "x" and "conspiracy to commit x" | are different counts. | throw_m239339 wrote: | > I have always wondered why "x" and "conspiracy to commit | x" are different counts. | | Conspiracy requires at least 2 people. | TrackerFF wrote: | Anyone here know what the (summed) minimum sentencing is for | all those crimes? | listenallyall wrote: | This outcome came about so quickly because she turned state's | evidence, in return for what is likely to be an extreme | reduction from that maximum (not that it was really a | possibility, as a first offender) | jjtheblunt wrote: | it's an enormous first offense, though does that matter? | Hamuko wrote: | Did Madoff have a criminal record before he got hit with | 150 years? | astrange wrote: | Seems like it might be a bad move to enter a conspiracy | with someone obsessed with game theory. | dclusin wrote: | She's still probably not getting out in less than 5 years | berkle4455 wrote: | I dunno she's comfortable with risk and doesn't bother with | pesky things like stop losses. | [deleted] | Barrin92 wrote: | >In the absence of a comprehensive regulatory framework over | digital assets, the CFTC will use all of its existing power and | authority to protect all market participants, while ensuring the | integrity of commodity markets | | Honestly it's good to see that the responsible American | institutions still seem to be reasonably quick and effective when | it comes to prosecuting the relevant people here, but can we | finally get that comprehensive regulatory framework in question? | | Legislators need to stop being asleep at the wheel. Be it the US | or the EU or someone else finally needs to take the air out of | this entire ecosystem that enables these fraudulent schemes in | the first place. | neonate wrote: | https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23495436-crypto-coop... | nemo44x wrote: | What a Queen. Massively connected and after destroying the life | of thousands of working class chumps she gets to walk free after | getting her wrist slap. | samwillis wrote: | Extensive previous discussion: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34088840 | sillysaurusx wrote: | She's the queen of wallstreetbets. I think she'll hold the yolo | record for a long time. | | I wish we knew what the fateful market play was that sunk her | ship. She mentioned she's not a fan of stop losses, so I wonder | if she went to bed with an open market position and woke up to | negative three billion. Also I wonder if the entity on the other | side of that trade realized they were making someone insolvent. | | It'll be interesting to see how long she's sentenced for. | | EDIT: Actually, is it possible to see who profited from her | trading activity? FTX is in the hands of authorities now, and all | the trading took place on it. I wonder if they could claw back | some of those lost billions. | potatototoo99 wrote: | There probably wasn't any single one trade. | baobabKoodaa wrote: | > She mentioned she's not a fan of stop losses | | At the volume they were trading, stop losses are no longer | practical. The market is not infinitely deep. | Lapsa wrote: | I've never understood how stop losses are supposed to help. | Traders read heaps of news, do God knows what technical | analysis yet simple "moves bit too much in wrong direction" | is supposed to be an acceptable exit strategy. | jacquesm wrote: | I think you are assuming way too much here. She's not the queen | of anything, she's a fraudster that will spend a long time in | jail and that has probably much less understanding of the | mechanisms involved than you give her credit for. If she did | she wouldn't be in the position she's in. The last thing we | really need is for people to start lionizing her. | ffssffss wrote: | Queen of WSB and yolo record are not a good thing... that is | a subreddit that mocks bad risk management by ironically | celebrating it. They know exactly what she is over there. | SpeedilyDamage wrote: | Hah maybe at one point was that sub ironic, it's been | unironic for years now. | qbasic_forever wrote: | That ship has long sailed. She's coming out of this with a | slap on the wrist because she ratted on SBF. She's a hero of | the alt right because her Tumblr is full of creepy eugenics | shit. She has a pervo following for being a poly sex fiend | (allegedly). She's going to write a book, sell her movie | rights, etc. and live a life of luxury as the woman that took | down SBF and FTX (who will be remembered as the real | fraudster). | dclusin wrote: | Years in prison is not a slap on the wrist. | qbasic_forever wrote: | She hasn't been sentenced yet. We don't know what the | terms of her deal are but they almost certainly involve | leniency in the sentencing. Her lawyer likely tried to | make a case that the big bad evil SBF sexually | manipulated her into committing fraud and actually she's | the real victim here. | dclusin wrote: | Leniency is a relative term. It's relative to the size of | the harm, number of victims, her centrality to it, etc. | If there's a for sure bet to be made here, it's that she | will be spending many years in prison for this. Just not | her whole life. That's what leniency here means. | howinteresting wrote: | I think she'll probably do 36 months or so. Not nothing | but also not life-destroying. | oldgradstudent wrote: | She's not anyone's hero. | | She's a freak in a freak show. The praise is ironic. | antonvs wrote: | "Queen of wallstreetbets" is (presumably) not a compliment, | it's a reference to the idiots on the subreddit of that name, | notorious for their irrational support of companies like | Gamestop, and completely disconnected from any actual | understanding of market behavior. | sillysaurusx wrote: | But she's highly regarded! | | It's all just a little joke. Check out | https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets. Also | https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jg85H26wyLk | | She certainly earned her sentence, and I have no sympathy for | her. But isn't it hard not to be at least a little impressed | with the sheer scale of her losses? Getting in the record | books for "most money lost by a single individual" is a hard | thing to do in general. | jacquesm wrote: | > It's all just a little joke. | | We don't share the same concept of humor then. | santoshalper wrote: | Don't let the killjoy bring you down. I got it and it was | funny. | jjulius wrote: | >It's all just a little joke. | | Super funny to every single person who lost money to the | person "getting in the record books for 'most money lost by | a single individual'". | pretendscholar wrote: | Yes it is quite funny when people get surprised that a | get rich scheme isn't real. | Hamuko wrote: | Well, if you're going to roll the dice with an | unregulated securities market because you want massive | profits, it helps to have a sense of humour about it. | actionablefiber wrote: | Bill Hwang has that number beat. | lmohseni wrote: | Masayoshi Son has entered the chat. | pearjuice wrote: | She's not going to get sentenced to any time whatsoever. She | cut a deal (full co-operation, forfeiture of assets and some | fines) and is voluntarily pleading guilty to honor the deal. | fredgrott wrote: | Gee I wonder if Arrow Capital thought it wise to stop hedging | via shorting; did Alameda Research fall into the exact same | trap? | | The only sure bet is yes they did! ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-12-23 23:00 UTC)