[HN Gopher] I want to suckless and you can too ___________________________________________________________________ I want to suckless and you can too Author : bradley_taunt Score : 26 points Date : 2022-12-23 18:26 UTC (1 days ago) (HTM) web link (bt.ht) (TXT) w3m dump (bt.ht) | hawski wrote: | As much as I like suckless software (not necessarily the | community) it is a pretty contentless article: | | - I like Suckless | | - I like Alpine | | - I like Void more now | | - Here's a script | spicybright wrote: | It's been a while since I've looked into it, but most minimal WMs | that I've tried fall over completely on high DPI displays from a | lack of a global zoom setting. | | Maybe my eyes are just getting bad (I'm ~30) but the lack of that | accessibility it makes them unusable for me. | leephillips wrote: | I use dwm (the suckless tiling window manager, certainly | "minimal") on a variety of high DPI screens, and there's no | problem. Just set Xft.dpi in your .Xresources file to the | "real" screen DPI or to anything you want to scale as you wish. | blueflow wrote: | You need to configure the DPI, either via xrandr --dpi or via | xrdb. | Avshalom wrote: | >>Software with a focus on simplicity, clarity, and frugality. | | >The developers also pride themselves on catering to advanced and | experienced computer users, | | But, no. It's a drumbeat of less code and fewer features. Which | is only simple in a specific worse is better sense and frequently | infrugal because efficiency would require more code. | | Advanced and experienced computer users are not catered to, not | catering to anyone who might need _a feature_ is their whole | schtick. | jmclnx wrote: | Suckless comes up every so often and then it goes on to politics | about the Suckless people. | | I really like the idea of Suckless, I wish the people involved | with it directly addresses what to me seems to be a disturbing | political slant at their conferences. | | Of course, you can ignore that an just use the software. Or | better yet look for other similar software created by people that | are apolitical. | | OpenBSD seems to be a place that does its best to be minimal, and | their network setup to me is far better then anything else in | Linux or the other BSDs. | _dain_ wrote: | Many times, when I see cool software projects are posted here, | I go onto the about pages or personal blogs of the authors, to | see what else they've made. And what I often see is a lot of | absurd, hateful, deranged, wrong, extremist takes on their | blogs and twitter feeds. Stuff that I find distasteful or | outright horrifying. But they're leftist (or "centrist"), so | there's no point complaining about it on HN. | | I would bet 98% of all open-source software written is by left- | wing or apolitical people. Suckless is one of the few islands | of (crypto-)right wing outlook. And if that bothers you and you | have to make a fuss, go ahead. But maybe ask yourself why you | can't be satisfied with a mere 98%. | [deleted] | djur wrote: | There are a lot of conservative, liberal, or left-wing people | I disagree with. The difference between them and fascists is | that they're not threatening to take away my right to | disagree with them by violence, nor do they typically suggest | that people like me and my friends should be killed or | imprisoned for being who we are. This is a fundamental | difference that can't be reduced to a "both sides have | extremists" analysis. | blueflow wrote: | Who is threatening to take away any rights? Who is | disagreeing using violence? Is this any real problem right | now? | ohCh6zos wrote: | Both the far left and the far right have told me I | shouldn't have rights and that I should be sent to the | camps. From my perspective it really is a 'both sides have | extremists' situation. | masklinn wrote: | > Suckless is one of the few islands of right wing outlook. | | It has a concerning concentration of outright neo nazis. | | If that's what you consider acceptable "right wing outlook", | I can see how you'd consider "98% of all open-source software | written is by left-wing or apolitical people [or | "centrists"]", and that this is apparently bad. | ohCh6zos wrote: | I'm pretty ignorant beyond they're software devs who write | stuff I like. I understand if you don't want to bring up their | politics here and potentially ruin this thread too, but if it | can be done tastefully I'd be curious about their politics. | kuschku wrote: | Well, they're doing torchhikes through the area near | Nuremberg on their meetups, they send emails through relays | with hostnames like "Wolfsschanze" and devs with official | suckless flair post on [website that's basically a clone of | HN] complaining about "cultural marxism". | | Obviously, you still have to interpret that yourself, but | these are the facts about the people behind suckless. | jmclnx wrote: | I would just do a search in google :) It was also mentioned | by L. Poettering on his twitter account a few years ago. | | I would like to see this thread stay true to Suckless itself | (for a change). | dpkirchner wrote: | This all looks bad enough that I'm not sure it's reasonable | to separate their "politics" from the people. | Avshalom wrote: | Probably shouldn't have brought it up unprompted in the | first comment on the thread then. | wpietri wrote: | I searched a bit and this is what I got: https://www.reddit.c | om/r/systemd/comments/qg1g88/poettering_... | BirAdam wrote: | I've always really loved suckless. Only thing I don't do is dwm. | I've always preferred evilwm with dmenu. | jmclnx wrote: | me, it is cwm :) | kace91 wrote: | > The developers also pride themselves on catering to advanced | and experienced computer users, which is actually a refreshing | take in my opinion | | Am I too old? | | My first linux install took me days to get to the point of | showing a desktop. _Not_ catering to advanced users is the | novelty in the linux world imo - and it's not entirely there yet. | printf_alex_ wrote: | My first (arch btw) linux install it took me a whole week to | install correctly in the first place, yet to show the DE. This | was with prior experience working with linux. I personally | liked that it was complicated since it was a good learning | experience (much better than the oversimplified Ubuntu install | anyways) | rhn_mk1 wrote: | While I agree with the basic idea, it seems that in practice it's | been taken over by ascetes who throw the baby out with the bath | water and impose pointless restrictions on themselves just for | signalling. | | If you want software to have less complexity, you don't choose a | language which gives you options, you choose one which removes | ways to make mistakes. That means, emphatically, not C. You don't | have to choose Rust, which is complex indeed, but allows your | code to be less difficult. If you want strictness, choose | Haskell. Or maybe go the middle way and do OCaml. Or maybe Ada. | | I don't understand how the suckless community goes from | "vulnerabilities are commonplace" and calling out masterminds to | writing C, which is famously difficult to code without stepping | into undefined behaviour. | | Or maybe I do: this checks out if minimalism is more important | than vulnerabilities and simplicity. | | Similar criticism can be applied to sticking to X11 compared to | Wayland, regarding vulnerabilities (any application can see any | other) and performance (any application can block the entire | server - try ssh -X on a high latency connection to see). | masklinn wrote: | > Or maybe I do: this checks out if minimalism is more | important than vulnerabilities and simplicity. | | Nah it does not. If minimalism is more important than | vulnerabilities and simplicity you use forth, or an advanced | assembler. | | It's dunning kruger. | gigatexal wrote: | No, no, no. Suckless's tiling window manager has no config. To | change anything you must recompile and relaunch. Wtf?? What kind | of ethos is that? ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-12-24 23:00 UTC)