[HN Gopher] Novell NetWare: The King Returns from the Dead (2001) ___________________________________________________________________ Novell NetWare: The King Returns from the Dead (2001) Author : susam Score : 33 points Date : 2022-12-26 12:25 UTC (10 hours ago) (HTM) web link (web.archive.org) (TXT) w3m dump (web.archive.org) | spijdar wrote: | > Enterprise management is impossible with Microsoft's domain | based Windows NT networking. Microsoft Active Directory, part of | the ever later Windows 2000, was supposed to fix this, but it now | appears MAD may be a failure (Microsoft is already trying to sell | its shortcomings as "features" and it isn't even out yet). | | Oh, poor Novell. This is all before my time, but to me Novell's | legacy is just "that company in the SCO vs. Novell lawsuit" and | occasionally seeing IPX traffic from e.g. printers in Wireshark. | It's odd to look at what could have been, from a once dominant | player that's disappeared into "tech myth" now. | | This really does seem to be an attempt at smiling in the face of | death though -- I've never played with NetWare but it's not hard | to see how Win2k would capture the market; setting up an AD | domain is a click-through process on a familiar OS/GUI, why | bother licensing and learning something like NetWare if Windows | is good enough... | torh wrote: | I remember Novells NDS (directory service) to be miles head of | Microsoft AD back in Windows 2000, and even many years after. | But AD was included "for free" in Windows, and the rest is | history... | gtirloni wrote: | What could it have been? Only thing I heard about Novell back | in the day was how awful and unreliable it was. | zabzonk wrote: | Awful, yes, unreliable no. What was unreliable was the | network infrastructure - coax ethernet, or even worse frozen | hosepipe and/or token ring. It was a happy day when twisted- | pair, star topology ethernet was introduced. | nradov wrote: | NetWare was reliable as long as you used high quality | hardware and didn't run any third-party applications on the | server. It didn't support real memory protection or | preemptive multitasking so if you tried to run a database or | email application on the NetWare server itself then it got | shaky. But the core file and printer sharing features were | fast and rock solid. | de6u99er wrote: | >After several attempts to cut in failed, Microsoft entered | merger talks with Novell's chief, Ray Noorda. Noorda discovered | Bill Gates was maneuvering behind his back even as they spoke, | and became infuriated. | sonofhans wrote: | I ran Netware 3.x and 4.x in the late 90s & early 00s. It was a | big professional office, and nothing was public-facing (all we | had was an ISDN line anyway). | | It was great, honestly. It took me years with Linux to become as | comfortable as I was with Netware. The stability of those | machines, in fact, allowed me free time to learn Linux in the | first place. | tibbon wrote: | I really liked Netware 4/5 era. I got my basic Novell certs in | high school and did a lot of administration work with it around | then. | | I always liked their file/resource permissions system, including | how its inheritance worked - far more than now Microsoft or *nix | implemented it. | spamtarget wrote: | aged like milk ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-12-26 23:00 UTC)