[HN Gopher] Waze tests new alerts warning drivers about roads wi...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Waze tests new alerts warning drivers about roads with a 'history
       of crashes'
        
       Author : mfiguiere
       Score  : 98 points
       Date   : 2022-12-28 19:04 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.theverge.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.theverge.com)
        
       | geocrasher wrote:
       | There is room for such alerts in many ecosystems. For example,
       | WordPress: There should be alerts for stale plugins, plugins that
       | have recently changed authors, and other metrics for awful
       | plugins. It could be condensed into a trust level rating from
       | 1-5. That's only one example.
        
       | ungamedplayer wrote:
       | My google maps has been doing this for weeks already. Is google
       | maps Waze?
        
       | drewg123 wrote:
       | It would be nice if they could offer an option to avoid roads
       | with histories of crashes (like tolls and ferries).
       | 
       | One example I have is there is an intersection on my way home
       | that Tesla maps (and Google maps) wants me to turn left at. The
       | problem is that its a left turn without a signal, across 4 lanes
       | of traffic with limited visibility. This is a recipe for crashes,
       | and I've seen multiple crashes here. However, if you go 1/4mi out
       | of your way then you go under a bridge and wind up at an on-ramp
       | to the same road .. no left turn needed.
       | 
       | It took me a while to discover this route when I moved here. It
       | would be nice if there was a "safer route detected, +1 minute"
       | option presented to me.
        
         | kqr2 wrote:
         | It would be nice if there was an option to avoid uncontrolled
         | lefts on busy intersections in general, aka "UPS mode" which
         | supposedly UPS does: https://hbr.org/2014/04/ever-notice-that-
         | ups-trucks-rarely-m...
        
           | gibspaulding wrote:
           | I've been wishing for this too. Not fastest or most fuel
           | efficient, but the easiest route. Really just as few turns as
           | possible, but especially avoiding things like two way stops
           | and uncontrolled left turns.
        
           | novia wrote:
           | I've been leaving feedback in Google Maps with exactly this
           | suggestion every time it takes me to one of those dangerous
           | left turns. If presented with one on my route I always take a
           | right and then do a u-turn.
        
         | hundchenkatze wrote:
         | Waze has an option to avoid difficult intersections under
         | Navigation settings.
         | 
         | https://i.imgur.com/7tvbYw3.jpeg
        
           | drewg123 wrote:
           | Nice, I had no idea. I admit that I've never used Waze..
           | maybe I should start.
        
       | clamprecht wrote:
       | Why doesn't Google Maps (or Waze) offer 3 choices:
       | 
       | 1. Fastest route
       | 
       | 2. Shortest route
       | 
       | 3. Safest route <-- this is the big one
       | 
       | The insurance companies would love it, and I'd love it. The data
       | is out there... I've been asking this for over 10 years.
        
       | EricE wrote:
       | This is seriously needed near me - there are a couple of freeway
       | interchanges with notorious merges that sport accidents bad
       | enough that at least a couple cars get towed every week. Not sure
       | it would cause the idiots that cut in and cause them (and who
       | usually get off scott free) to shape up but would at least give
       | more heads up to other people to maybe not tailgate at high
       | speed?
        
         | akira2501 wrote:
         | I would assume that a statistically significant increase of
         | accidents in an area is due to road design failure and not to
         | lack of driver information. The obvious answer is to fix the
         | road, not add more automated distractions to a drivers
         | attention load.
        
           | macNchz wrote:
           | Generally I agree, we should absolutely design roads to guide
           | drivers into proper behavior, but there are some drivers who
           | are simply way more dangerous than others^, and I'd love to
           | have this feature to know where to be extra alert for other
           | drivers messing up.
           | 
           | I have a fascination with watching dashcam videos on
           | /r/roadcam and /r/idiotsincars (I think it has made me a
           | better/significantly more defensive driver), and seeing some
           | of the videos from places that have fixed cameras that catch
           | every crash just makes it clear that some portion of people
           | _simply don 't pay attention to anything_.
           | 
           | In the 11'8" bridge example (https://11foot8.com/), they've
           | installed a system that detects if the approaching truck is
           | too tall, flashes an "OVER HEIGHT" neon sign, and
           | automatically turns the traffic light red. They even raised
           | the bridge 8 inches a few years ago. People consistently
           | ignore the sign, run the red light, and rip the roof off of
           | their truck on the special bar that was installed to protect
           | the bridge from direct damage.
           | 
           | In the Milwaukee Roundabout example
           | (https://www.youtube.com/@MilwaukeeRoundabout/videos),
           | drivers are coming across the bridge _way, way_ above the
           | speed limit to go sailing as far as they do. Perhaps in this
           | case the road could be narrowed and speed bumps installed,
           | but this is a contingent of drivers who are not paying
           | attention to the road, and the rest of us would benefit from
           | knowing where they screw up.
           | 
           | ^As an example, 17-19 year old drivers have a _19-fold_
           | higher risk of a fatal single-car crash than 60-69 year olds:
           | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002243751.
           | ..
        
             | hammock wrote:
             | "Warning: teenagers at the wheel" (in the style of
             | "children at play")
        
               | BitwiseFool wrote:
               | I have a feeling this would be considered unacceptable
               | ageism elsewhere, but Japan requires some drivers to
               | display a sticker which indicates to "other drivers that
               | the marked driver is not very skilled, either due to
               | inexperience or old age".
               | 
               | For the Young/New:
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoshinsha_mark
               | 
               | For the Elderly:
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C5%8Dreisha_mark
        
           | BitwiseFool wrote:
           | Agreed, in principle. There is an intersection on my commute
           | that was _almost certainly_ designed to look pretty and break
           | up the monotony of the grid layout with some elegant curves.
           | Sadly there are accidents almost every single week, most
           | likely because of bad sight lines and how much turning goes
           | on. It would be nice for them to  "fix the road" by just
           | straightening it out but it would likely require a staggering
           | amount of time and money because of how much infrastructure
           | has been built up around it. The city has already tried what
           | it can, so I think having the warning in the app is the best
           | we can do in the meantime.
        
           | madspindel wrote:
           | Is it a road design failure if it's more dangerous to drive
           | above the speed limit?
           | 
           | In Sweden we have some roads with a lot of accidents caused
           | by people driving above the speed limit.
           | 
           | They fixed this by installing automated speed cams. The goal
           | is not to give people speeding tickets but to get drivers to
           | slow down. It works really well so I actually believe this
           | new Waze feature will be really handy.
           | 
           | Edit: Btw, I use Waze to get alert about the speed cams.
        
             | EamonnMR wrote:
             | I can think of one intersection in my town with several
             | accidents. It's a cross intersection with stops signs on
             | one street and none on the other. The accidents probably
             | all boil down to some combination of "He won't pull out"
             | and "I'm tired of waiting." A signal light would eliminate
             | this indecision. I fault the road design, because it
             | requires patience people just don't tend to have to use it
             | safely.
        
             | rattlesnakedave wrote:
             | It's not mutually exclusive.
        
             | akira2501 wrote:
             | > They fixed this by installing automated speed cams.
             | 
             | That is a user hostile way to solve the problem, and it
             | still leaves the design issue open. _Why_ are people
             | driving too fast for what the road can safely allow for?
             | 
             | There's a lot of work being put into road design which
             | naturally calms traffic, and a good part of it shows
             | promise. Large wide open boulevards seem to encourage
             | people to driver faster than what is actually safe because
             | they feel comfortable driving at that speed with that much
             | perceived space.
             | 
             | If you narrow the road, add center island obstructions to
             | limit long distance views, remove outside lanes for parking
             | with curb extensions or put in protected bike lanes,
             | roundabouts, better lane markings, they all seem to make
             | drivers more aware of the density of their environment and
             | work to slow them down naturally.
             | 
             | And again.. this all works to get them paying attention to
             | the environment, not simply trained to wait for an
             | automated alert with financial consequences.
        
           | anigbrowl wrote:
           | _The obvious answer is to fix the road_
           | 
           | If you're paying, sure. If you're not, the obvious answer is
           | to route away from the accident-prone routes while trying to
           | minimize increases in journey time.
        
       | sixothree wrote:
       | I remember a local news story where a woman described neighbors
       | having complained to the city for years on end about a
       | particularly dangerous intersection where someone recently died.
       | She lamented how now that someone had died the city would have to
       | do something to fix it.
       | 
       | And all I could think about was how the city was very literally
       | not going to do a single damn thing about it.
        
       | nfRfqX5n wrote:
       | assuming they have the data, it would be great for them to
       | publish a report of the most dangerous roads. they could even
       | suggest routes that are "safer"
        
         | grecy wrote:
         | And that should result in the roads / intersections being
         | redesigned to make them safer.
        
           | jeffbee wrote:
           | The roads that are "safety corridors", at least the ones in
           | California, are rural two-lane, two-way undivided roads where
           | people kill themselves trying to overtake cars that are going
           | 1 MPH slower than them. The only way to redesign these is
           | with K rails down the middle, but the ideal thing to do is
           | mandate speed limiters in cars.
        
         | lelandfe wrote:
         | A great oxymoron to Google if you're American is the "safety
         | corridors" in your area. That's the term for highway stretches
         | that have a lot of fatalities.
         | 
         | They're often indicated on highway signage, which I hate
         | because you'd never intuit the meaning.
        
           | BitwiseFool wrote:
           | Reminds me of "Sanitary Sewer".
        
       | tantalor wrote:
       | At a higher level you could model a danger/anxiety/rage level for
       | a segment of road taking in lots of signals like crashes, sudden
       | stops, swerving, honking, speeding, etc.
       | 
       | Then you could offer an "avoid shit drivers" route option.
        
       | xwdv wrote:
       | What I would like is warnings about roads with a history of
       | police sightings.
        
         | tenebrisalietum wrote:
         | If that information were to be shared, it would stop being
         | useful quickly.
        
       | dmix wrote:
       | I've heard Waze is merging teams with Google Maps.
       | 
       | Will Google Maps adopt these unique alert features?
        
       | Someone1234 wrote:
       | Is this actionable? Seems like noise without purpose, almost like
       | showing off their data haul without there being anything a driver
       | can change to be safer with this additional information.
       | 
       | Plus is this road-usage normalized? A freeway with bumper-to-
       | bumper traffic is going to have more crashes than a country road
       | with a few vehicles an hour, but one crash a day on one Vs.
       | multiple a day on the other could be required to indicate a more
       | dangerous stretch in real-terms.
        
         | ape4 wrote:
         | Avoid that blue car with license starting with ABC
        
         | googlryas wrote:
         | Wouldn't the thing the driver could do is pay more attention?
         | Like it or not, but driver attention rises and falls along a
         | drive.
         | 
         | Or, take a different route, probably eventually as presented by
         | waze? Presumably they aren't just going to say "hey a lot of
         | people die on this route. LOL good luck"
        
           | Someone1234 wrote:
           | So the goal is to keep the driver's attention on the road by
           | flashing an additional notification to distract them from the
           | road?
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | BitwiseFool wrote:
             | Most GPS and Map Apps have audible notices. Mine speaks up
             | if there is debris or an accident ahead and it is not
             | intrusive or wildly distracting.
             | 
             | For as long as these kinds of navigation utilities have
             | been around, it seems like the implementation of non-
             | intrusive or at the very least not-overly-distracting
             | notifications have been figured out by the industry.
        
             | googlryas wrote:
             | Maybe? A one second glance could put you in the mindset
             | where you're ready to brake hard, or put some extra
             | distance between you and the car in front, or choose to not
             | search for the next song you want to hear, etc.
        
         | BoorishBears wrote:
         | I built a demo of this at in a weekend for a hackathon and we
         | even had a team member drive around with live updates during
         | our presentation
         | 
         | Circling the building, the gauge for accident risk spiked as
         | the team member drove past the poorly marked entrance to the
         | parking garage of the building we were sitting in.
         | 
         | I'd say getting alerts about things like that would be fairly
         | useful because most people don't drive at "maximum safety" all
         | the time.
         | 
         | You can get people to slow down at least somewhat closer to the
         | speed limit, get more attentive, etc. in hotspots for
         | accidents.
         | 
         | Of course, that might just end up shifting the hotspots in some
         | cases, but more often than not I imagine you'd find an
         | environmental aspect to hotspots, like our poorly marker
         | garage, or areas where sunlight can be blinding during commute
         | hours.
        
         | curiousllama wrote:
         | Absolutely. Slow down, give more room, don't look at the
         | directions, double-check your mirrors, etc. Nobody is on full
         | alert for all of a 3 hour drive - but they certainly can be for
         | a dozen 2-minute stretches where people often get into
         | accidents.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2022-12-28 23:00 UTC)