[HN Gopher] Fetish Tabooness vs. Popularity ___________________________________________________________________ Fetish Tabooness vs. Popularity Author : nhchris Score : 37 points Date : 2022-12-30 22:14 UTC (45 minutes ago) (HTM) web link (aella.substack.com) (TXT) w3m dump (aella.substack.com) | greggarious wrote: | >taboo _n_ ess | | Oh, ok. I thought you said something else for a second. | | This is interesting... but please be aware publishing data on | these things changes it, since the fetish community is full of | weird little edgelords who poop themselves in fear (rather than | as part of some mutually agreed upon sex game) when they realize | you weren't kidding when you told that cutie in Bloomington that | Armin Meiwes did nothing wrong and that next time you don't want | to _just_ dry fire their wonder nine. | | And if you _really_ want to have fun, do as Kinsey did and have | them flip a coin and only be truthful if it 's heads, then double | your sample size to compensate. That's how you gather _truly_ | useful data that will keep you entertained long after your IRB | certification expires ;-) | burnished wrote: | Do you have any references to that Kinsey thing? I would just | love to read a methodology section including that | williamtrask wrote: | The technique is called randomised response. Differential | privacy formalises it as well | pmarreck wrote: | The Kinsey trick is brilliant. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2022-12-30 23:00 UTC)