[HN Gopher] Rust for Professionals ___________________________________________________________________ Rust for Professionals Author : keewee7 Score : 21 points Date : 2023-01-02 20:59 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (overexact.com) (TXT) w3m dump (overexact.com) | joaquincabezas wrote: | I keep saving these Rust resources for a near future... Am i the | only one?? | | I really hope to start using Rust in 2023, probably for some kind | of API gateway experimentation | tmtvl wrote: | I saved up Common Lisp resources for a few years and in 2022 I | finally decided to sit down and learn it. It was entirely worth | it, so I recommend you sit down to learn Rust one weekend. In | fact, do it next weekend. Getting started on anything is always | better done sooner than later. | mlindner wrote: | It'd be nicer if there was some way of selection which language | is shown on the left side. Expecting readers to understand both | C++ and Kotlin and Java and Javascript will be a stretch for | most. | clumsysmurf wrote: | I thought there would be an option to select just one, but | seems they are indeed just random smatterings of rust vs { | Typescript, Javascript, Kotlin, Java, C, and C++ } | 86J8oyZv wrote: | These features aren't each supported by all those languages | though. I also don't think expecting a dev interested in Rust | to understand several C-like languages is unreasonable, at | least enough ti understand these straightforward example cases. | nine_k wrote: | AFAICT, the expectation is that the reader knows at least one | modern programming language from the list, and maybe is | acquainted in passing with a couple of others. So at least some | comparisons should click. | | (They seemingly don't use more apt comparisons with OCaml and | Haskell, for instance, not expecting the reader to know them.) ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-01-02 23:00 UTC)