[HN Gopher] The MTA's armored money train that ran from 1951 to ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The MTA's armored money train that ran from 1951 to 2006 in NYC
        
       Author : pseudolus
       Score  : 141 points
       Date   : 2023-01-14 12:32 UTC (10 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (untappedcities.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (untappedcities.com)
        
       | speedplane wrote:
       | Saw both the movie and the real thing multiple times. Subject of
       | numerous a heist fantasy... even today though, the MTA guys
       | collecting money from the machines are escorted by NYPD
       | conspicuously showing their firearms while giving you the eye.
       | The attitude remains.
        
       | pjdemers wrote:
       | The Boston MBTA had the same thing. I saw their armored train in
       | the early 80's. The guards carried shotguns, just like in the old
       | west.
        
       | JackFr wrote:
       | I never saw the movie, but I saw the actual money train in action
       | two three times in my 20's. Probably about 3:30 AM - having spent
       | all my money at a bar forced me to take the subway instead of a
       | cab.
       | 
       | Disappointment at first because you saw a train coming, and then
       | realized it was a no-passenger work train. And then it stopped
       | and a couple of guys with long guns got off and stood guard while
       | a couple of others would go and get the money from the booth.
       | Totally cool to see.
       | 
       | I believe there was an attempted robbery sone time in the 80's or
       | 90's. The train just pulled out of the station, leaving
       | frustrated criminals, who then shot up the heavily reinforced
       | token booth to no effect.
       | 
       | (Not mentioned in the article is that they collect garbage from
       | platform trash bins the same way.)
        
         | listenallyall wrote:
         | > having spent all my money at a bar forced me to take the
         | subway instead of a cab
         | 
         | an NYC resident "forced" to take the subway... smh
        
           | [deleted]
        
             | [deleted]
        
           | sbaiddn wrote:
           | I mean you're going to shower in a few hours anyway. But
           | until you do you have to sleep with that sticky smell.
        
             | CrazyStat wrote:
             | Can always shower before you go to bed.
        
           | JackFr wrote:
           | Please. I take the subway everyday twice a day. You must
           | admit at 3:30 AM after a night at a bar, a cab would be
           | preferable to the subway.
        
             | jMyles wrote:
             | > You must admit at 3:30 AM after a night at a bar, a cab
             | would be preferable to the subway.
             | 
             | ??
             | 
             | The wee hours after a night out is one of my favorite times
             | to ride the subway. More surreal, smaller crowds - feels
             | like a movie.
             | 
             | I suppose it depends on which train and what the origin and
             | destinations are.
        
             | Symbiote wrote:
             | In London I always prefer the underground to a cab after a
             | night out.
             | 
             | The car is driven by someone tired yet in a hurry, on busy
             | roads with (usually) lots of turns. There's not much space.
             | 
             | Way outside the peak times, the train is spacious, brightly
             | lit and there's almost zero risk of an accident. 10 minutes
             | walking at either end is probably a good idea after N hours
             | in a bar.
        
               | i_am_proteus wrote:
               | Depending on the line, graveyard hour subways in NYC can
               | be a long wait before a train arrives.
        
               | BayesianDice wrote:
               | And in London, the Underground closes down altogether
               | overnight, except for some lines running on Friday and
               | Saturday nights. (And that Night Tube service is a
               | relatively recent innovation, starting in 2016.)
        
               | kranke155 wrote:
               | The night tube is one of the best things that's ever
               | happened to London.
        
               | StanislavPetrov wrote:
               | >Way outside the peak times, the train is spacious,
               | brightly lit and there's almost zero risk of an accident.
               | 
               | In NYC the subway is filthy, urine soaked and at 3:30 AM
               | there is higher than zero chance you will be harassed or
               | assaulted.
        
           | Spooky23 wrote:
           | At 3AM drunk? That's called looking for trouble.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | jallen_dot_dev wrote:
         | > (Not mentioned in the article is that they collect garbage
         | from platform trash bins the same way.)
         | 
         | Armed guards seem like overkill for collecting garbage.
        
           | whatshisface wrote:
           | The incredibly strong selective pressures on city raccoons
           | keep making them more intelligent.
        
             | KptMarchewa wrote:
             | I read this in David Attenborough's voice.
        
           | LarryMullins wrote:
           | You know what they say; one man's trash is another man's
           | treasure.
        
       | helmsb wrote:
       | Seems interesting but the ads and full screen modals ruined it.
        
         | eric-hu wrote:
         | My friend, ad blockers will make your life so much better. I
         | recommend Ad Guard for Safari and uBlock origin for Chrome and
         | FF.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | NoToP wrote:
       | Hold up. The metro card side of the story doesn't make sense. Why
       | would it relocate to Maspeth Queens, a place that is right in the
       | middle of the transit desert not reachable by subway at all. It's
       | the exact opposite of 370 Jay. Nothing goes there. Is it just
       | cheap parking for armored vehicle lot? Does it have anything to
       | do with the MTA owned non passenger tracks which do go through
       | there? And why was it considered so much more cumbersome to
       | collect fares off the metro card machine compared to the booth
       | sales? So many unanswered questions.
       | 
       | I do wonder if armored trains might be part of special scenario
       | plans related to high value visitors to the UN. Think of it as a
       | modern track 61.
        
         | Spooky23 wrote:
         | There's an article that does a better job describing it written
         | when the guy who ran the operation retired.
         | 
         | https://www.curbed.com/2021/04/al-putre-mta-money-room.html
         | 
         | Basically the money train was a dinosaur with operational
         | issues. They moved to armored cars. My guess is that the
         | transition reduced the number of station agents required and
         | reduced shrink, but increased NYPD overtime. (MTA lost the
         | transit police in the 90s)
        
           | scoopertrooper wrote:
           | I think this explains why:
           | 
           | > Once the MetroCard vending machines came into the picture,
           | it took a lot longer to collect all the money from a given
           | station than it had from just the token booths, and the money
           | train would sit for long stretches as passenger trains backed
           | up behind it. Also, you can't do money-collection runs at
           | night if you're doing track maintenance, and these days the
           | MTA is always doing track maintenance.
        
       | madamelic wrote:
       | Pretty sure PATH was doing something similar even in 2015 - 2017.
       | 
       | I remember multiple times being annoyed by a short train that
       | would block a station for 10 minutes in the late morning. Police
       | would get off, go upstairs, then come back with presumably money.
       | Maybe I was mistaken why they were there but that was always my
       | impression.
       | 
       | I am sort of surprised they stopped picking up cash this way
       | since it always struck me as smart because no one could
       | necessarily know when they were coming, could vary pick up times,
       | advantage of grabbing money and disappearing into the tunnel.
        
         | krisoft wrote:
         | > struck me as smart because no one could necessarily know when
         | they were coming
         | 
         | But a train is a big, unique thing, and it takes very
         | predictable paths. There are so many ways to track a train.
         | Insiders in the rail company giving you tips, lookouts
         | reporting from the place where the train is parked usually or
         | at trackside, disturbances in the timetable of other trains.
         | Attaching tracking equipment by insiders or intruders.
         | 
         | > could vary pick up times
         | 
         | Why is that an advantage for trains? Can't any armoured truck
         | do the same?
        
           | LarryMullins wrote:
           | > _lookouts reporting from [...] trackside,_
           | 
           | This could even be done openly without attracting attention,
           | since railfans hanging out next to tracks waiting for trains
           | are common.
        
       | raldi wrote:
       | How do they collect cash from all the MetroCard vending machines
       | now?
        
         | muglug wrote:
         | With traditional armoured cars.
         | 
         | Also, those machines are being phased out this year in favour
         | of OMNY machines: https://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-
         | boroughs/news/2022/09/06/omny-ma...
         | 
         | As more of the network moves cashless, there's also less money
         | to collect. As a regular commuter, I haven't used cash on the
         | MTA for a couple of years.
        
           | raldi wrote:
           | Why didn't they use traditional armored cars when they were
           | still using tokens? I don't understand why 2006 was a
           | milestone in that regard.
        
             | Animats wrote:
             | Hauling all those coins and tokens up the stairs to street
             | level by hand would have been a huge pain. Many MetroCards
             | are sold in stores, so the MTA doesn't have to handle the
             | cash at all.
             | 
             | For one year Ticketmaster sold Metrocards for the MTA.
             | Ticketmaster didn't like the business because the MTA
             | didn't allow them to overcharge the customers. Ticketmaster
             | just got a 2%-3% commission, the MTA's bulk discount. They
             | had to charge for shipping at their cost, and could not
             | attach ads.
        
             | Spooky23 wrote:
             | You still need to count sort, pull damaged and counterfeit
             | tokens and do cash operations.
             | 
             | So the station management would count their tills, empty
             | machines and prep the bags. They have a time deadline, and
             | when the money train arrives they just roll the whole
             | ensemble into the train. When the tokens went away the
             | volume probably turned into a few sacks.
             | 
             | The volume is huge and the manpower for the armored cars
             | would be nuts. You're probably talking a detail of 200
             | police alone for a couple of dozen armored cars.
             | 
             | Cash operations work similar to this without the train.
             | Usually there's a regional depository bank with a contract
             | with the Fed who centralizes money processing for many
             | banks. I had family who worked in one in the 90s, it was
             | pretty nuts. They would palletize the cash and ship out on
             | tractor trailers. As the business has shrunk, the armored
             | car companies have taken over and they are pretty bad at
             | what they do as they aren't as regulated.
        
               | ghaff wrote:
               | All this really helps to highlight why municipalities are
               | really trying to get away from cash for transit, parking,
               | etc. It's not cheap or easy to handle at scale and, at
               | some point, the answer to people who want to keep using
               | cash is a shrug.
        
               | Spooky23 wrote:
               | Ehh... once you have a process it isn't that expensive.
               | The driver is similar to retail - you can charge more.
               | 
               | Parking and tolls are great examples. EZPass and the
               | various parking solutions are expensive, but they make it
               | easier to boil the frog. That makes it easier to do one
               | shot deals like sell revenue bonds.
               | 
               | The failure of the government to implement digital cash
               | and establish a system where Visa/Mastercard/etc
               | effectively tax all commerce is ridiculous.
        
             | crazygringo wrote:
             | I'm guessing something to do with weight/volume.
             | 
             | When tokens were used, _every_ subway fare resulted in a
             | piece of metal that had to be picked up. At 4.7 g each and
             | about 4 million rides a day, that 's nearly 19 metric tons
             | of metal daily for processing, which takes up a lot of
             | space as well.
             | 
             | After tokens were phased out in 2003, then by 2006 you're
             | only dealing with paper cash and coins in MetroCard and
             | booths, mostly just picking up paper bills and spitting out
             | coin change for larger transactions, from the small
             | minority of people paying in cash instead of a credit card.
             | So I'd expect the volume to have become comparatively tiny,
             | and much less frequent than daily.
             | 
             | (Plus since you're dealing with standardized cash rather
             | than bespoke tokens, it might use local banks distributed
             | across the city, rather than a centralized hub.)
        
         | ape4 wrote:
         | Asking for a friend ;)
        
       | chadlavi wrote:
       | See also the charming but not especially good 1995 action flick
       | Money Train: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0113845
        
         | itisit wrote:
         | I recall renting this on laserdisc when I was teen and being
         | thoroughly entertained. I'd be surprised if it doesn't hold up
         | as the popcorn flick it's always been.
        
           | chadlavi wrote:
           | It's a fun watch but as an adult watching it you definitely
           | notice a lot that could have been done better. The first hour
           | or so is kind of a go-nowhere time waster relative to the
           | main plot.
        
         | e40 wrote:
         | The Taking of Pelham 123 is far better.
         | https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1111422/
         | 
         | Edit: wrong one, this is the best one
         | 
         | https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0072251/
        
           | plusminusplus wrote:
           | Tarantino uh, _borrowed_ the idea of the criminals calling
           | each other pseudonyms from the 1974 version for his film
           | _Reservoir Dogs_
        
             | ghaff wrote:
             | It's been ages since I've seen either but thinking about it
             | there is a certain sibling relationship between the two
             | films.
        
         | gonzo41 wrote:
         | I remember seeing this when I was younger around the time it
         | came out and being blown away. It didn't hold up so well on a
         | rewatch a few years back.
        
         | version_five wrote:
         | This was my first thought as well! I've never seen it, but I
         | had a VHS tape with a preview for it at the beginning that I
         | watched regularly, which I still remember.
         | Wesles Snipes: we're not going to rob the money train
         | Woody Harrelson: why not             Snipes: because, we're...
         | we're cops
         | 
         | It was a tantalizing preview
        
           | SirLJ wrote:
           | https://youtu.be/5Odo80-WFgM
        
       | Mountain_Skies wrote:
       | Atlanta, having a much smaller transit system, has (or had) what
       | looked like an oversized airline food service cart that was moved
       | by regular passenger service between stations. In K-Mart "Blue
       | Light Special" fashion, it had an amber rotating light on top of
       | a pole connected to the cart. IIRC, there were always two armed
       | employees operating it but otherwise the whole operation seemed
       | rather relaxed. Most stations only had kiosks to vend transit
       | tickets. The ones with manned "Ride Stores" might have had a more
       | secure procedure for moving cash in and out.
        
         | itsmartapuntocm wrote:
         | MARTA does have a pair of old cars converted into a "work
         | train". Not sure what its purpose is though.
        
           | Mountain_Skies wrote:
           | Probably useful for moving materials between stations and
           | delivering supplies to worksites on the tracks (which they
           | always seem to be repairing).
        
         | dwightgunning wrote:
         | Seems logical to move smaller sums more frequently.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-01-14 23:00 UTC)