[HN Gopher] Netflix Has Created a Self-Fulfilling Cancelation Lo... ___________________________________________________________________ Netflix Has Created a Self-Fulfilling Cancelation Loop with Its New Shows Author : mikenew Score : 52 points Date : 2023-01-16 20:59 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.forbes.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.forbes.com) | redm wrote: | The worst part of this is the statement that 1899 was canceled. I | just finished it and was looking forward to the second season. I | guess there's no way in Netflix to know if a show is ever coming | back.. Will there ever be another Black Mirror season.. who | knows.. | jameshart wrote: | A lot of people seem to assume a network-TV economic model | applies to netflix, where 'ratings' are inherently good, and high | rated shows beget renewals, and so on... | | But, Netflix subscriptions are much more in the 'gym membership' | economic model. | | People watching shows on Netflix costs Netflix money. They would | much rather take your money and have you _not_ watch anything. | | The ideal Netflix subscriber is someone who won't cancel because | they think they might want to watch something some time, but who | whenever they browse the shows decides not to bother starting a | show right now. | | This strategy seems optimized for maximizing that audience. | runamok wrote: | I know what you are saying but from what I understand the | network costs per user are pretty negligible. I think its more | that if a show is not a hit and does not become a big draw for | users Netflix will nix it especially because the way most deals | are done subsequent seasons cost them much more than the first. | | I have read the above in the past but can't find a good source | at present as I am on mobile so apologies. | webwielder2 wrote: | If this trend results in more miniseries versus long-winded, | open-ended season after season that go nowhere, I'm all for it. | DalekBaldwin wrote: | I think this trend is why they've gone all-in on sex-on-the- | beach shows and true crime docuseries. One season can easily be | self-contained, and if the viewer gets another, it's just a | nice bonus. | Eddy_Viscosity2 wrote: | Even a switch to closed-form seasons would be good. Complete | arc in one season. Then do that again for another season and | another. | ceejayoz wrote: | I'm all for focused shows - The Good Place is a nice example of | one that didn't overstay its welcome - but there are a lot of | _great_ shows that wouldn 't survive the "canceled after the | first season unless metric x is met" climate. | | Star Trek: The Next Generation serves as a good example; the | first season was _rough_. Didn 't hit its stride until the | second, when Riker grew the beard. | jbaber wrote: | This is so true that "Growing the Beard" is the opposite of | "Jumping the Shark" in TV tropes: | | https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/GrowingTheBeard | devnullbrain wrote: | A quirk of human psychology is that we value ongoing storylines | as if they were finished storylines. When we watch a Lost or | read a Song Of Ice And Fire, we relate the twists and turns to | finished stories we already know - or even to real life. We | take it as a given that the plot thread spun in episode 3 will, | somewhere, have a satisfying conclusion. The method that put | the gun on the wall must satisfy physical and logical laws. So | we become invested. | | As a result, writers are incentivised to write convoluted, | twisting, mysterious threads. | | They're not required to finish them. | twiceaday wrote: | I don't think this is much deeper than modern media abusing a | strong expectation set-up by past media. The short-term | mysteries are only as interesting as the audiences | expectation that they will be resolved in an interesting way. | We are trusting the narrator not to let us down. But of | course it is much simpler to create mystery than to resolve | it, and whenever the resolution is bad that trust gets | chipped away. I think this trust is a limited resource and it | feels like too many modern stories are chipping away at it. | At least thats the case for me. I've become jaded about this | kind of breach of trust. The shows hope that I am not | attentive enough and keep around my positive memories of the | mystery after observing the awful resolution. No. I go out of | my way to taint past memories and call the experience bad | overall. | andrejguran wrote: | https://archive.ph/YffFM | scohesc wrote: | Someone more TV-knowledgeable can answer this for me or provide | further clarification for me, but are there parallels between the | Netflix show methodology and Anime? | | From my small amount of experience absorbing the anime world, it | seems like a lot of studios find a manga/source material, then | cram all the storyline into one season as the funding might not | be there, etc. etc. | | I wonder if the motivations in the Anime world to put out one | season are the same or similar to the Netflix show motivations - | find a source material or writer who has a decent story, crank | out a 1-season concept and if it takes off, you have a money- | maker that will likely last a few years with more | seasons/spinoffs. | layer8 wrote: | For manga-based anime, there often isn't quite enough material | yet to fill two seasons/cours, so they cram it into one, trying | to fit some sort of story arc. There is certainly also the | factor of risk reduction, only plan one season initially in | case it isn't successful. One difference from Netflix shows is | that anime is usually part of a media mix (manga, light novels, | merchandise, games, songs/music, physical media sales, | sometimes musicals and other events), so even if it's just one | season with an open-ended storyline or a premature pseudo- | ending, it serves to promote the other media of the franchise. | | See also this answer on stackexchange: | https://anime.stackexchange.com/a/55361 | stackedinserter wrote: | Maybe these shows are being cancelled because they're not good | enough and people don't watch them. | | "Netflix adaptation" is already a meme these days for a reason. | acdha wrote: | > Maybe these shows are being cancelled because they're not | good enough and people don't watch them. | | How do you square that with the people saying they would have | watched it but never got the chance? It seems unlikely that a | few weeks is enough to exhaust the pool of potential viewers, | especially for a company which was once famous for monetizing | the long tail. | xboxnolifes wrote: | For the same reason that is brought up on every survey-based | research discussion thread: what people say and what people | mean/do are not the same. | MBCook wrote: | A month or so ago I saw a great set of tweets guessing at what's | going on. | | Residuals. | | (EDIT: | https://mobile.twitter.com/PeterClines/status/16104085799406...) | | After the initial window they have to pay residuals every time | people watch the episodes. As a series goes on, more people might | start watching if it's popular. The people who are already | watching may re-watch it to get ready for the new season. All of | that means paying for residuals. | | But if your shows are flash in the pan, that's not as much of an | issue. When Netflix cancels a show what are the odds a bunch of | people are going to start watching it four years from now? | | And what happens if you constantly drop new shows and heavily | promote them, hiding what a person was already watching? They may | go to that new show and stop watching the old one? The window is | new on the new show. | | Why release all episodes at once? So people watch it fast, not | over enough time for residuals to be big. | | It seems like they are incentivized to keep people from re- | watching existing things. | | This may not actually be what's going on. But it seems to fit | weirdly well. | at_a_remove wrote: | * * * | mindcrime wrote: | I was thinking the exact same thing a couple of days ago, when I | heard about 1899 being cancelled. The thing is, I totally wanted | to watch that, and it was on the "short list" of things I'd | planned to start watching soon. But now that I know that it's | cancelled, and especially knowing that it ends with a | cliffhanger, there's no reason for me to _ever_ bother starting | it. | | Look, I know there are financial considerations at play for | production companies and all. But at some point you gotta be | willing to either commit and do something all the way, or not do | it at all. This half-assing isn't helping anybody. | | This isn't just Netflix either. My big fear now is that the | "Wheel of Time" series will be cancelled before the entire story | is told. Which makes me very reluctant to start watching it. And | if other people are also reluctant to start it for the same | reason, that's going to hurt the viewership... which makes it all | the more likely to be cancelled! You can't win. | kneebonian wrote: | Never half-ass two things, whole-ass one thing. | | Ron Swanson, Parks and Recreation | _moof wrote: | Fortunately with Wheel of Time the story has already been told. | You can go read it whenever you want. And although I'm not | normally a "the book was better" type, for this reader, the | show really is disappointing. | mindcrime wrote: | I'm on the last book literally right now. So yeah, I'll have | read it either way. But I was kinda sorta thinking that a | nice way to celebrate finishing the books would be to jump | over and watch the show. I've heard mixed reports on how good | (or bad) it is though, so I dunno. | | Anyway, WoT in particular aside, the basic principle is the | same: if you're going to take on producing an epic work, I'd | _really_ prefer that you commit to actually finishing it. | That 's true pretty much regardless of what | franchise/property we're talking about. | acdha wrote: | That was especially weird to do right around the holidays. Some | people are single & stuck in the airport but an awful lot of | people are not looking to binge a show during peak family | season. I was planning to try it this month but... | treeman79 wrote: | For some reason the first half of Voltron season 1 is missing | on Netflix. They produced the show. Confusing. | fizx wrote: | Wheel of Time was made by a team that respects the source | material about as much as the team that ruined the last seasons | of Game of Thrones. Unfortunately, you're not missing much. | mindcrime wrote: | Fair enough. But I'd at least like them to finish it, so that | in the off chance I like what they've produced, I'll have a | complete product to watch. It would suck to get really | engrossed in it and then find out they quit halfway through. | :-( | iforgotpassword wrote: | I somehow managed to watch 1899 right on release and really | enjoyed it, so am really bummed. But a lot of people around me | just haven't gotten around to it because of the holidays, and | now say the same thing as you do. | | And I've heard some fans of DARK saying they just couldn't get | into it because it was too slow, but I really liked that style | of storytelling. | | I just wish everybody and their mom would put on that show now | even if they don't actually watch it, so maybe the numbers | change and they reverse their decision. I actually took this as | the final straw to cancel my Netflix subscription and will only | ever sign up again if that show gets finished. | schneems wrote: | > It's now created a system where creators should be afraid to | make a series that dares to end on a cliffhanger | | I don't see that as a bad thing personally. But I've 100% avoided | watching some series that I know have been canceled. | | I'm wondering what a better model might be? Maybe air the pilots | and let the people decide? | jon-wood wrote: | The better model in my view is for screenwriters to write | series that stand in their own right. It should be very | apparent at this point that shows get cancelled, often after | one or two seasons, so plan for that. Don't set up a six season | story arc while failing to tell a worthwhile single season | story. | watwut wrote: | Yeah. The cliffhangers are not even there for viewer pleasure. | They are just there to force you to watch next series so that | you learn how it ends. | | Getting rid for them is not exactly a loss. | lofaszvanitt wrote: | Someone maybe read too much mysticism and think they get a hard | on (power?) by trashing their previous works, watching as no | matter what they do with it, an established franchise with a | strong fan base will sell no matter the content. | | Same patterns emerge in gaming. Strong, very good gaming studios | with established franchises suddenly come up with terrible | sequels with mind boggling narrative, borderline idiotic, | superficial characters and plot. And all of these took 5+ years | to be made :DDD. | linuxhansl wrote: | Am I the only one who does not like episodes and prefers movies? | | One the one hand there is time for development that a movie would | not have, on the other hand it often feels drawn out. | green-salt wrote: | I'd really rather have a 'complete' story that was thought out | more than a week in advance like some shows. | harrisonjackson wrote: | If you like 1 season shows and don't mind subtitles, then Viki | (streaming service) has a lot of kdramas that have a complete 1 | season storyline. They've even remade some American shows with a | single season. | jmyeet wrote: | Netflix has fallen into the Google trap. | | Google famously kills projects and half-asses things. This | destroys user trust. Eventually people won't use your new thing | because they don't want to become dependent on something that's | just going to languish before being cancelled. | | Larry Page's "more wood, fewer arrows" idea never really took | hold. | | Apple OTOH is very good (mostly) at focusing on fewer things and | seeing them through. Apple Pay is a prime example of this. Every | month there are more banks and financial institutions onboarded. | | But this hurts Netflix on both sides. The obvious one is for | viewers. It's becoming increasingly less likely that I become | invested in some Netflix series knowing it's likely fate. Even | the otherwise excellent Ozark's 4th season felt rushed, like they | were trying to cram 2-3 seasons of storylines into one season. | | HBO has generally been very good at seeing things through. There | are notable exceptions (eg Rome, Deadwood, arguably even | Westworld although that one is complicated). | | But it hurts Netflix on the creator side. If you're an Aaron | Sorkin type shopping around your series and you have a lot of | suitors, why would you choose Netflix when you fear it'll get | cancelled prematurely. Now you can write in commitments into | contracts. This happened with House of Cards, initially two | seasons guaranteed IIRC. But not everyone has that leverage. | | It seems like Netflix has fallen into the trap of optimizing for | the wrong metrics, specifically short-term new customer signups. | Maybe they look at customer retention too? Maybe customers don't | actually care about this? I honestly don't know. | | I do think they're hurting their brand though. | tapoxi wrote: | This is ultimately why I stopped watching television. I want to | experience the whole story, and I want to be know it ties | everything up and has a satisfying ending. | raffraffraff wrote: | I'm the opposite. I prefer to wait until a whole series has | finished and then watch the seasons that were decent, and screw | the rest. I watched 2.5 seasons of ~Tits And Dragons~ Game Of | Thrones, and honestly, that was 1.5 seasons too many. I'm also | perfectly happy to rewatch Firefly knowing that they never | finished it of with some bullshit final series or movie* that | tried to tie it up with a bow, and ultimately fail. | | *I know | | Edit: awww, hn doesn't have strike through markdown support :( | phpisthebest wrote: | That is what made netflix popular in the beginning before their | "orginals" phase | | You could watch an entire TV Show, Back to back with no | interuptions, or waiting a week. | | A Already made show would drop on nextflix, 5 seasons worth all | at once, and "binging content" was born... | | Sad they do not know their own market anymore. Who ever running | netflix these days is terrible | 988747 wrote: | "Binge watching" is also weapon of Netflix demise: they drop | the whole season at once, you watch it in a day or two, and | then you forget it, and you never log in to Netflix again for | several weeks. HBO dropping one episode at time creates a | feeling of anticipation, and gives you a reason to keep your | subscription always active, because every couple days there | will be something new for you to watch.. | phpisthebest wrote: | Not me, I do not watch any streaming show until the entire | season at a minimum has dropped | | I also do not subscribe to HBO Max in part because of that | sylens wrote: | I wonder if they would ever experiment with a lower cost | membership that only has X hours of streaming per month. My | favorite part of Netflix (and other streaming services that | drop entire seasons at once) is that I can fit my viewing | into my schedule. I may watch two episodes in one week | because I have time that week, and then not watch anymore | for two weeks as I'm busy with other things, only to return | and watch 3 episodes at the start of the next month. A | lower cost plan with a cap on hours would actually work | well for me. | mindcrime wrote: | _then you forget it, and you never log in to Netflix again | for several weeks._ | | But unless you actually cancel your subscription, that's | not a bad thing for Netflix. All the time you're not in | there watching content is time you're not consuming | bandwidth or CPU cycles, etc. It's kinda like a gym: the | perfect customer is somebody who signs up for a membership, | and never shows up again, while keeping their membership | active. | | Now I know some people do the whole "binge for a while, | cancel my subscription and come back in a couple of months | thing." A good friend of mine actually does that. But I | suspect most people are too lazy to bother, and keep their | account active even when they aren't actively watching | something. But maybe that's just me projecting? Hmmm... | kelseyfrog wrote: | I'm largely the same. I've recentered my life in a way where I | rarely encounter groups where the main topic is "are you | watching the latest thing," and the consequence is being free | from show FOMO. | | Now I judge shows based on how they end. I don't care if I'm | years late to watching it. If it's good it will age well, and | if it's not then it won't. I've been duped too many times with | Lost and GoT standing out in particular. | | If I kept watching the new stuff, I'd be a sucker. | eddie_catflap wrote: | I agree. Honestly if I'm browsing for something new and it has | several seasons it puts me off even starting. I don't want to | invest that much time into something when the quality is pretty | much guaranteed to drop as time goes on. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-01-16 23:00 UTC)